5,0
Produce
Prime
Mission
Equipment
9,0
Operate
the System
Environment
Produce
Elements
of Support
Maintain
the System
(as Required)
In User
Example: First-Level Diagram
i
\
Ref: Operate the System
in User Environment
9.7
Prepare Aircraft for Flight |
- |
Taxi Aircraft Takeoff |
|
Takeoff |
— |
Cruise Out to Mission Site |
- |
Conduct Mission |
— |
Cruise Sack to Base |
— |
Land at Home |
- |
Perform Aircraft Checkout |
|
Prepare
Aircraft for Standby
9.4
9.3
9.5
9.6
9,
9,9
9.2
^
^
i ^:
Conduct Mission
9.6.1
Check
Radar Subsystem
9.6,2
Search for
9.6.3
Track
Target
I Example: Maintenance Flow (Partial)
10,1.2
10.1.1
Remove
Unit A
Isolate Fault j to Unit A \ :
10.2-1
10-2.2
Isolate Fault to Unit B |
|
Remove Unit B |
|
|||
|
|
|||||
|
10.3.1 |
|
10-3-2 |
|||
|
Isolate Fault |
|
Remove |
|||
|
toUnii C |
|
Unit C |
|||
Figure 5-2. Series of flow diagrams (evolutionary development).
132
Functional Analysis and Requirements Allocation Chap. 5
Ref:
5.4 Perform
Range Measurements
-i
••*
* \
Reference: Figure 5-3
Ref: 5,0
Acquire Range
Information
Ref: 5.4.1 Detect and Decode Range information
Ref: 5.4.2
Measure Time Delay
Between Transmitted
and Reply Signals
etc,
etc.
%;
*•?'
•i,
'tit
i •-,;?4>.
*
Figure 5-4. Range information functional-flow diagram.
C. Maintenance Functions
Once operational functions are defined, it is appropriate to continue with the system definition process by developing maintenance functions. Referring to Figure 5-2, there are expected performance requirements associated with each block (signal level, tolerances, unit dimensions, level of activity quality, speed of task completion), A check of the applicable function will indicate either a go or a no-go decision, A go decision leads to the next operational function. A no-go indication (constituting a symptom of malfunction) provides a starting point for the development of detailed maintenance functional flow diagrams- The transitional process, in evolving from operational functional flows to maintenance functional flows, is shown in block 9.6.1 of Figure 5-2. These interfaces are also illustrated in Figure 5-5, which shows a simplified lawn mowing capability. Figure 5-6 presents another example of a maintenance functional flow diagram, as it evolves from the operational flow in Figure 5-3.
Maintenance functions identified at this point should reflect the effectiveness and supportability factors specified at the system level, as well as the availability of logistics resources. In some instances it may be possible to expand top-level functional flows in a manner similar to the example presented in Figure 5-4. In most cases, however, only an estimate of first-level maintenance functions can be made, since the availability of preliminary data is limited. Maintenance functional flows can and should also be prepared for preventive maintenance, transportation and handling functions, support equipment corrective maintenance, servicing, inspections, and so on. The maintenance functional flows that are developed are used to update the system maintenance concept in terms of the functions performed by level, repair policies, and preliminary equipment packaging schemes (discussed in Chapter 4). The maintenance concept/functional flow development process is iterative, and is continued throughout the early system definition process.
