Questions

1. What preparation is required to host such an event as the Olympic Games? – change / improvement of infrastructure of the city – airports, roads, transport, accommodation, stadiums + (as well as the running costs of the event itself.) We should look if they will need to be improved or changed.

This is going to happen according to existing plans, separate from Olympics.

2. How much have they allocated for infrastructure improvements?

They have to allocate some money for infrastructure development (in the 403 …) for building of new facilities.

They must be spend on a new 80,000-seat stadium); buying of land in … on which it must be built.

We estimate it will cost 325 …

The main items of expenditure include: the cost of staging the event,

the cost of security,

we‘ve allocated 127 … towards improving the team’s chances of winning some medals.

We have to cover any unforeseen problems.

3. What is the estimate for total expenditure?

The total expenditure will be 1.69 million pounds

4. How can they estimate future income? – There will be 1.3 billion pounds in direct revenue. That’s 846 m from tickets sales and 436 m from other sources.

The there’ll be a contribution from the IOC about 100 m p-s.

All the sponsorship and advertising deals.

We estimate it will be approximately half a billion pounds.

After the event the resale of surplus land will bring in at least 430 m p-s.

Tourism generated by Olympic visitors and the tax from the 9,000 jobs created will bring in another 810 m p-s.

4. What about final estimated (предполагаемый) profit figure? – We think it could be much higher in practice.

5. What benefits could this event bring for the city?

There are the business opportunities that the Games will bring – job creation, investment in poor areas leading to economic revival, housing, food and catering, advertising.

It’s all good for business and these are long term benefits that will generate (создавать, приносить) income for years to come,

And add to the profit side of the balance sheet.

4. What changes or improvements to a city continue after the event has finished? London

To host a major event like Olimpic Games it is necessary to change / improve the infrastructure of the city - airports, transport, roads, accommodation, stadiums and to estimate the running costs of the event itself.

As for London the basic infrastructure was already there, and there were plans to improve things. The government allocated some money for infrastructure development (403 m pounds for building of new facilities).

This included building a new 80,000-seat stadium.

The next item was the buying of land on which the new stadium and new facilities were built. It cost another 325 m pounds.

There were three other main items of expenditure. The first was for the cost of staging the event, which was estimated at 679 m pounds.

Then there was approximately 50 m for the cost of security.

They also allocated 127 m pounds towards / for improving the team and 106 m pounds to cover unforeseen risks (any unforeseen problems).

So, the total expenditure was 1.69 billion pounds.

But a total figure of income was much bigger than that (the total figure of expenditure.

As it was calculated there was 1.3 billion pounds in direct revenue.

It was 864 m from ticket sale and 436 from other sources.

Then there was a contribution from IOC about 100 m pounds.

There was also the sponsorship and advertising deals, which were estimated approximately half a billion pounds.

Then after the event the resale of surplus land used for the Games brought in 430 m pounds.

Tourism generated by Olympic visitors and the tax from the 9,000 jobs created brought in another 810 m pounds.

So, the final estimated profit figure was under 1.5 (one and a half) billion pounds, but it could be much higher in practice.

As for benefits there was job creation, investments in poor areas leading to economic revival, housing, food and catering, advertising.

It was also good for business and there were all long term benefits that generated income for years to come, and added to the profit of the balance sheet.

Лондон Для размещения крупного события, как Олимпийские игры надо изменить / улучшить инфраструктуру города - аэропорты, транспорт, дороги, жилье, стадионы и оценить текущие расходы самого события. Что касается Лондона базовой инфраструктуры уже был там, и там были планы по улучшению вещей. Правительство выделило деньги на развитие инфраструктуры (403 м фунтов на строительство новых объектов). Это включает строительство нового 80000-местный стадион. Следующим пунктом была покупка земли, на которых новый стадион и новые объекты были построены. Это стоило еще один 325 м фунтов. Существовали три основных статей расходов. Первый по стоимости организацию мероприятия, которое было оценено в 679 фунтов м. Потом было около 50 м расходы на обеспечение безопасности. Они также выделили 127 м фунта по отношению к / для улучшения команды и 106 м фунтов для покрытия непредвиденных рисков (любые непредвиденные проблемы). Таким образом, общая сумма расходов была 1690000000 фунтов. Но общая сумма доходов был намного больше, чем (общая сумма расходов. Как было подсчитано, что в 1,3 млрд. фунтов стерлингов в прямой доход. Это был 864 м от продажи билетов и 436 из других источников. Потом был вклад МОК около 100 фунтов м. Существовал также спонсорство и рекламные сделки, которая оценивается приблизительно в полмиллиарда фунтов. Затем, после событий перепродажи излишков земель, используемых для игр принес в 430 фунтов м. Туризм порожденные Олимпийские посетителей и налога с 9000 рабочих мест принесли в другом 810 фунтов м. Таким образом, окончательная цифра по оценкам прибыль в 1,5 (полутора) миллиардов фунтов стерлингов, но он может быть гораздо выше, на практике. Что касается преимуществ было создание новых рабочих мест, инвестиции в бедных районах, ведущих к экономическому возрождению, жилье, питание и столовое обслуживание, реклама. Кроме того, было хорошо для бизнеса, и были все долгосрочные выгоды, который сгенерировал доход на долгие годы, и добавляется к прибыли в балансе.