- •Introduction
- •1) Criminal Law and Tort Law Contrasted
- •B. The origins of canadian tort law
- •1) The Nature of the Defendant's Conduct
- •2) The Nature of the Plaintiff's Loss
- •D. The objectives of tort law
- •2) The Instrumentalist View
- •I) Specific Deterrence
- •II) General Deterrence
- •III) Market Deterrence
- •E. Personal injury, tort law, and other compensatory vehicles
- •1) Governmental Initiatives
- •2) Private Sector First-Party Insurance
- •F. The organization of tort law
- •A. Introduction
- •1) Application of the Standard of Care
- •I) Judicial Policy
- •2) Special Standards of Care
- •3) Proof of Negligence: Direct and Circumstantial Evidence
- •1) Cause-in-Fact
- •4) Market Share Liability
- •5) Loss of a Chance
- •6) Multiple Tortfeasors Causing Indivisible Damage
- •D. Damage
- •E. The duty of care
- •1) The Foreseeable Plaintiff (The First Branch of the Anns Test)
- •2) Policy Considerations (The Second Branch of the Anns Test)
- •The Supreme Court decision in Galaske V. O'Donnell [Note 123:
- •In its recent decision in Ryan V. Victoria (City) [Note 126:
- •F. Remoteness of damage
- •1) The Foreseeability Rule
- •G. Defences
- •1) Contributory Negligence
- •2) Voluntary Assumption of Risk (Volenti Non Fit Injuria)
- •3) Illegality (Ex Turpi Causa Non Oritur Actio)
- •4) Inevitable Accident
- •H. Remedies
- •1) Personal Injury
- •I) The Impact of the Trilogy
- •2) Death
- •3) Property Damage
- •A. Introduction
- •B. Products liability
- •1) Manufacturing Defects
- •2) The Duty to Warn
- •3) Reasonable Care in Design
- •1) The Duty of Care
- •2) The Standard of Care
- •D. Human reproduction
- •1) Prenatal Injuries
- •2) Wrongful Birth
- •3) Wrongful Life
- •4) Wrongful Pregnancy
- •E. Occupiers' liability
- •1) The Classical Common Law of Occupiers' Liability
- •2) The Modern Common Law of Occupiers' Liability
- •3) Legislative Reform
- •F. Breach of statutory duty
- •G. Pure economic loss
- •I) Foreseeable Reliance/Reasonable Reliance : The Prima Facie Duty of Care
- •II) Policy Concerns: The Issue of Indeterminacy
- •2) Negligent Performance of a Service
- •3) Relational Economic Loss
- •I) Contractual Relational Economic Loss
- •4) Product Quality Claims
- •H. Governmental liability
- •2) Negligence
- •In Rondel the House of Lords provided a number of reasons for the immunity. They included:
- •Intentional torts
- •A. Introduction
- •B. The meaning of intention
- •C. Intentional interference with the person
- •1) Battery
- •3) False Imprisonment
- •5) False Imprisonment and Malicious Prosecution
- •6) Malicious Procurement and Execution of a Search Warrant
- •7) Abuse of Process
- •9) Privacy
- •10) Discrimination
- •12) Harassment
- •13) Defences to the Intentional Interference with the Person
- •III) Defence of a Third Person
- •V) Discipline
- •VI) Necessity
- •VII) Legal Authority
- •VIII) Illegality: Ex Turpi Causa Non Oritur Actio
- •II) Contributory Negligence
- •1) Elements of Liability
- •2) Defences to the Intentional Interference with Land
- •3) Remedies
- •4) Trespass to Land and Shopping Malls
- •5) Trespass to Airspace
- •E. Intentional interference with chattels
- •1) Trespass to Chattels
- •3) Conversion
- •4) The Action on the Case to Protect the Owner's Reversionary Interest
- •5) An Illustrative Case: Penfold's Wines Pty. Ltd. V. Elliott
- •6) The Recovery of Chattels
- •F. Intentional interference with economic interests
- •1) Deceptive Practices
- •II) Conspiracy to Injure by Unlawful Means
- •I) Direct Inducement to Breach a Contract
- •II) Indirect Inducement to Breach a Contract
- •Intentional Interference with the Person
- •Barry j. Reiter Melanie a. Shishler
- •1) Elements of Liability
- •2) Defences
- •Barry j. Reiter Melanie a. Shishler
- •1) The Elements of Liability
- •3) Dogs
- •4) The Scienter Action and Negligence
- •Barry j. Reiter Melanie a. Shishler
- •1) Elements of Liability
- •2) Defences
- •Barry j. Reiter Melanie a. Shishler
- •2) Principal and Agent
- •3) Statutory Vicarious Liability
- •4) Independent Contractors
- •In Lewis (Guardian ad litem of) V. British Columbia, [Note 50:
- •5) Liability of the Employee or the Agent
- •Barry j. Reiter Melanie a. Shishler
- •Chap.6 Contents
- •1) Physical Damage to Land
- •2) Interference with Enjoyment and Comfort of Land
- •7) Defences
- •8) Remedies
- •1) The Definition of a Public Nuisance
- •A. Introduction
- •2) Reference to the Plaintiff
- •3) Publication
- •E. Defences
- •2) Privilege
- •3) Fair Comment on a Matter of Public Interest
- •F. Remedies
- •H. The next challenge: political speech
- •A. Introduction
- •1) Contract Law and Tort Law
- •2) Fiduciary Law and Tort Law
- •3) Restitution and Tort Law
- •C. Public law
- •1) The Charter of Rights and Freedoms and Tort Law
- •A. The centrality of the tort of negligence
- •B. The dynamism of the tort of negligence
- •C. Generalization and integration
- •D. Reform and modernization
- •E. The triumph of compensation and loss distribution policies
- •Ison, t.G., The Forensic Lottery: a Critique on Tort Liability as a System of Personal Injury Compensation (London: Staples Press, 1967)
- •Intentional conduct of a public official in abuse of her power, or knowingly beyond the scope of her jurisdiction, causing damage to the plaintiff.
- •Preface
- •Philip h. Osborne
Intentional conduct of a public official in abuse of her power, or knowingly beyond the scope of her jurisdiction, causing damage to the plaintiff.
Mitigation of loss
Steps that a plaintiff might reasonably be expected to take to minimize the damage or loss caused by the tortfeasor.
Necessity
A defence alleging that the tortfeasor's conduct should be excused on the grounds that he acted in an emergency and the benefit gained by his wrongful act outweighed the harm suffered by the plaintiff.
Negligence
A tort based on careless conduct or conduct that creates a reasonably foreseeable risk of harm.
Nervous shock
Psychiatric damage giving rise to physical consequences or a recognized psychiatric illness caused by a sudden and unexpected traumatic event.
No-fault compensation
Compensation based on the condition or need of an incapacitated person rather than on the proof that the loss was caused by the wrongdoing or tort of another person.
Nonfeasance
The failure to confer a benefit or an advantage on another person.
Novus actus interveniens
;A Latin term for an intervening unforeseeable event that occurs after the defendant's negligent act and operates to precipitate or worsen the plaintiff's loss. The defendant is not liable for the loss precipitated or aggravated by such an event.
Nuisance (private)
Conduct that interferes unreasonably with the use, enjoyment, and comfort of land.
Nuisance (public)
Conduct that unreasonably interferes with the exercise of public rights or endangers the lives, property, or comfort of the public.
Occupier
A person with actual control of premises or land.
Occupiers' liability
A common law or statutory tort controlling the liability of occupiers of land or premises for harm caused to their visitors.
Passing-off
A misrepresentation that goods or services sold by one person are those of another or that they have a quality associated with those of the other person.
Personal injury
The |
|
term is used in tort law to include traumatic injury, illness, and nervous shock. |
|
Pleadings
The |
|
process of a formal exchange of written documentation between the litigants defining the contested issues of fact, and, to a lesser extent, law, giving rise to the dispute between the parties. |
|
Policy
A term that refers to the judicial analysis of the social costs and benefits of a legal principle or a judicial decision.
Possession of chattels
Physical control of a chattel.
Possession of land
Actual occupation of land coupled with the intention to control entry.
Prescription
The |
|
doctrine of land law under which persons secure an interest in land by acts of user or the lapse of time. |
|
Recklessness
Conduct that exposes others to a very high risk of injury.
Remoteness of damage
A rule that determines if the damage suffered by the plaintiff is sufficiently proximate to the tortfeasor's conduct to justify the imposition of liability.
Res ipsa loquitur
;A Latin phrase meaning that the "facts speak for themselves." A kind of circumstantial evidence of negligence arising from the occurrence of an accident of unknown cause that does not normally happen without the negligence of a person.
Restitutio in integrum
;A Latin phrase meaning the restoration of an injured person to the position she was in before the tortfeasor's conduct.
Rylands v. Fletcher (the rule in)
A tort of strict liability for damage caused by the escape of something likely to do mischief from a non- natural (dangerous) use of land.
Scienter action
The |
|
Latin word for knowledge. A common law action imposing strict liability for damage caused by animals that the owner knows to be dangerous. |
|
Several concurrent tortfeasors
Two |
|
or more tortfeasors whose independent tortious acts are causes-in-fact of indivisible damage. |
|
Several liability
Where two or more tortfeasors independently cause the same harm to the plaintiff and each is individually liable for the plaintiff's loss.
Slander
An oral defamatory communication.
Strict liability
Tort liability based solely on the causation of damage rather than proof of the defendant's intent or negligence.
Thin-skull rule
The |
|
principle that requires a tortfeasor to take his victim as he finds him and to compensate him to the full extent of his injuries even though they may be more serious than expected because of the plaintiff's pre-existing conditions, predispositions, and vulnerabilities. |
|
Tort
A civil wrong remedied primarily by an award of damages.
Tortfeasor
A person who has committed a tort.
Trespass
A term deriving from the ancient writ of trespass that provided a civil remedy for direct damage to person and property.
Trespass ab initio
;A principle that deems a person who enters land as of right to be a trespasser from the moment of entry if she abuses or exceeds her licence while on the property.
Trespass to chattels
The |
|
direct and intentional interference with a chattel in the possession of another. |
|
Trespass to land
A direct and intentional intrusion on land in the possession of another.
Trespass by relation
A principle that deems a person with a right to the immediate possession of land to have been in possession of the land from the time the right arose once he has regained possession of it.
Trespasser
A person who enters land without permission of the possessor or remains on land after the permission of the possessor is revoked.
Vicarious liability
The |
|
liability of one person for the torts of another because of the nature of the legal relationship between them, for example, employer and employee. |
|
Volenti non fit injuria
;A Latin phrase meaning that "no injury can be done to a willing person." A defence based on the plaintiff's consent to injury without legal recourse against the person who caused it.
Volition
The capacity consciously to control and direct bodily movement.
Warranty
A strict contractual promise; a guarantee.