- •Part 1. Near miss reports
- •Case study - 1. Pilot Ladder Insecure
- •1. Answer the questions.
- •2. Decide if the following statements are True or False. Correct the wrong ones.
- •3. Give synonyms to the given words. You may use more than one.
- •Read a near miss report (see a sample in annex).
- •Case study-2. Very Near Miss
- •Answer the questions.
- •Choose the factors which could become a reason of possible disaster and discuss them.
- •3. Decide whether these statements are true or false. Correct the wrong ones.
- •4. Read a near miss report (see a sample in annex). Complete a near miss report covering the following items.
- •Case study - 3. Irresponsible Actions (near collision)
- •1. Answer the questions.
- •2. Choose the factors which could become the reasons of possible collision between Panamax box ship and the inbound vessel.
- •3. Decide whether the statements are true (t) or false (f). Correct the wrong ones.
- •4. Divide the following actions between inbound and outbound vessels. Analyze the situation as if you were a harbor pilot. Make a short report
- •4. Read a near miss report (see a sample in annex).Complete a near miss report covering the following items.
- •Answer the questions.
- •Explain the following expressions.
- •3. Correct the mistakes.
- •Put the words in the correct order.
- •Read a near miss report (see a sample in annex).Complete a near miss report covering the following items.
- •Case study - 5. Unsafe Speed in Congested Area
- •1. Answer the questions.
- •2. Decipher the following abbreviations.
- •3. Find the appropriate words from the text which correspond to the following definitions.
- •4. Decide if these statements are true or false. Correct the wrong ones.
- •5. Complete the following table on non-compliance with colreGs.
- •6. Read a near miss report (see a sample in annex).Complete a near miss report covering the following items.
- •Case study - 6. Taking Avoiding Action too late (near collision)
- •1. Answer the questions.
- •2. Decide if these statements are true or false. Correct the wrong ones.
- •3. In the text, find the equivalents to the following expressions.
- •4. Decide which statements are referred to incident № 1 and which - to incident № 2.
- •5. Read a near miss report (see a sample in annex).Complete a near miss report covering the following items.
- •Case study - 7. Man Overboard
- •1. Answer the following questions.
- •2. Match the synonyms.
- •3. Explain the meaning of the following words and expressions.
- •4. Decide if these statements are true (t) or false (f)? Correct the wrong ones.
- •5. Read a near miss report (see a sample in annex). Complete a near miss report covering the following items.
- •Case study - 8. Lifeboat Lowered Unintentionally
- •1. Answer the questions.
- •2. Decide if these statements are true or false? Correct the false ones.
- •3. Explain the following terms.
- •4. Match words from column a with antonyms from column b.
- •5. Read a near miss report (see a sample in annex).Complete a near miss report covering the following items.
- •Case study - 9. Near Collision in Anchorage
- •1. Answer the questions.
- •2. Decide if these sentences are True or False. Correct the wrong ones.
- •3. Explain the following terms.
- •4. Match words from column a with their synonyms from column b.
- •5. Complete a near accident report (see annex) covering the following items.
- •Case study -10. Man overboard due to improper repair to pilot ladder
- •Answer the questions.
- •2. Define the purpose of the following aids.
- •Discuss with your partnet. Which of the factors could have led to fatality?
- •5. Complete a near accident report (see annex) covering the following items.
- •Case study - 11. ColreGs Violation (Rule 9)
- •1. Answer the questions.
- •2. In the text, find synonyms to the following words.
- •3. Find antonyms in the text to the following words.
- •4. Match the words in column a and the words in column b.
- •5. Decide if these statements are true or false? Correct the false ones.
- •6. Make up questions to the parts of the sentence in bold.
- •7. Complete a near miss report (see annex) covering the following items.
- •Case study -12. ColreGs Violation (Rule 10)
- •1. Answer the questions.
- •2. Find synonyms in the text to the following words.
- •3. Find antonyms in the text to the following words.
- •4. Match the words in column a and the words in column b.
- •5. Decide if these statements are True or False. Correct the false ones.
- •6. Make up questions to the part of the sentence in bold.
- •7. Complete a near miss report (see annex) covering the following items.
- •Case study -13. ColreGs violation in crossing situation
- •1. Answer the questions.
- •2. Decide if the following statements are True or False. Correct the false ones.
- •3. Complete a near miss report (see annex) covering the following items.
- •Part 2 cargo related incidents Cargo Damage, Loss or Shortage
- •Case study Case study - 1: Wetting of Logs (Cargo Damage)
- •1. Answer the questions.
- •2. Explain the following terms.
- •3. Decide if these statements are true (t) or false (f).Correct the wrong ones.
- •4. Choose the factors which could affect the stowage factor and stability condition of the tween-decker cargo ship.
- •5. Make up a cargo claim on behalf of consignee or a Sea Protest on behalf of the Master.
- •6. Complete an incident report (see annex) covering the following items.
- •Case study -2: Hazards of under-declared cargo weights in containers
- •1. Answer the questions.
- •2. Explain the following terms.
- •3. Decide whether the statements are true (t) or false (f). Correct the wrong ones.
- •4. Decipher the following abbreviations: ukc, sms
- •5. Choose the factors which could become reasons of danger of the vessel’s grounding in the channel.
- •6. Complete an incident report (see annex) covering the following items.
- •Case study - 3. Containers Overboard
- •1. Answer the questions.
- •2. Explain the function of the documents.
- •3. Decide whether the statements are true (t) or false (f). Correct the wrong ones.
- •4. Find synonyms for the following expressions in the text.
- •5. Compose a letter of protest on behalf of the Master on 6 containers missing while on route.Explain the cause.
- •6. Complete an incident report (see annex) covering the following items.
- •Case study - 4. Damage to Cargo in Severe Weather
- •1. Read the text. Analyze the situation yourself. Afterwards compare your opinion with the expert assessment.
- •2. Answer the questions.
- •3. Decipher the abbreviations and comment on them.
- •4. Match expressions in column a with their definitions in column b.
- •5. Decide whether the statements are true (t) or false (f). Correct the wrong ones.
- •6. Compose a sea protest on behalf of the Master.
- •7. Complete an incident report (see annex) covering the following items.
- •Vessel related incidents
- •1. Collision: Striking or being Struck by another Vessel regardless of whether Underway, Anchored or Moored
- •Case study - 1. Collision near Pilot Station
- •2. Area of high traffic density;
- •1. Answer the questions.
- •2. Decide if these sentences are true (t) or false (f). Correct the wrong ones.
- •Case study -2. Collision during Berthing
- •1. Answer the questions.
- •2. Decide if these statements are True or False? Correct the false ones.
- •3. Make up questions to get the following answers.
- •4. Complete the chart. Tick the person who is in charge of the collision during berthing.
- •Case study - 3. Collision in Congested Waters
- •2. Answer the following questions.
- •3. Decide if the following statements are True or False. Correct the wrong ones.
- •4. Explain the following terms
- •5. Complete the following table on non-compliance with colreGs.
- •6. Complete an incident report (see annex) covering the following items.
- •Case study -1. Contact with Gantry Crane
- •1. Read the text. Analyze the situation yourself. Afterwards compare your opinion with the expert assessment.
- •2. Answer the following questions.
- •3. Explain the following terms.
- •4. Decide if the following statements are True or False. Correct the wrong ones.
- •5. Find in the text the pilot’s commands to the vessel and the tug.
- •6. Complete an incident report (see annex) covering the following items.
- •Case study - 2. Contact with Berth during Strong Flood Tide
- •1. Read the text. Analyze the situation yourself. Afterwards compare your opinion with the expert assessment.
- •2. Answer the following questions.
- •3. Make up questions to parts of the sentence in bold.
- •4. Explain the following terms.
- •5. Decide if the following statements are True or False. Correct the wrong ones.
- •Case study - 1. Non-contact damage
- •Answer the questions.
- •Explain the following terms.
- •4. Grounding, Stranding and Foundering;
- •Case study -1. Grounding
- •Answer the questions.
- •Give English equivalents to the following definitions.
- •3. Complete an incident report (see annex) covering the following items.
- •Case study - 2. Stranding. Master under Pressure to Enter Port.
- •1. Answer the questions.
- •2. Explain the following terms.
- •3. Decide if these statements are True or False. Correct the wrong ones.
- •4. Complete an incident report (see annex) covering the following items.
- •5. Hull and Machinery – danger or failure of ship and/or its own equipment
- •1. Answer the questions.
- •2. Translate the expressions from English into Russian.
- •3. Say the dates, times and prices from the text. What do they refer to?
- •4. Put in the words from the box to describe the incident with the vessel.
- •5. What is hull and machinery insurance about? Put the sentences in the correct order of events from the text. The first event is given. Translate the sentences orally.
- •6. Complete an incident report (see annex) covering the following items.
- •6. Fire. Explosion This type of incidents involves machinery spaces or the living accommodation and the cargo being carried.
- •Case study - 1. Premature Reopening of Fire Area Causes Re-ignition
- •Case study - 2. Bagged Copra Fire
- •Answer the questions.
- •2. Explain the following terms.
- •Case study - 3. Collision and Explosion Kills Nine
- •1. Answer the questions on the text.
- •Choose between two vessels – a and b – to state what actions each of them performed.
- •Which of the officers below did the following actions?
- •4. Analyze the situation given in the text and state your arguments due to the following points:
- •5. Complete an accident report (see annex) covering the following items.
- •Part 4 people related incidents
- •Case study – 1. Mooring accident
- •1. Read the text. Analyze the situation yourself. Afterwards compare your opinion with the expert assessment.
- •2. Answer the questions.
- •3. Explain the following terms.
- •4. Complete an accident report (see annex) including the following items.
- •Case study – 2. Series of mis-steps end in the sea
- •1. Answer the questions.
- •2. Explain the following terms.
- •3. Decide whether the statements are True or False. Correct the wrong ones.
- •4. Complete the following statements.
- •5. Find in the text all life saving appliances. Name them, describe their function
- •6. Complete an accident report (see annex) covering the following items.
- •Case study – 3. Darkened workplace and an unprotected hazard to fatality
- •1. Answer the questions.
- •2. Decide whether the statements are True or False. Correct the wrong ones.
- •3. Match the words from column a with the appropriate words from column b to form the collocations and use them in sentences of your own.
- •4. Complete an accident report (see annex) covering the following items.
- •Case study - 4. Work aloft without precautions proves fatal
- •1. Answer the questions.
- •2. Match the words from column a with the appropriate words from column b to form the collocations and use them in sentences of your own.
- •3. Comment on the following factors which could cause the accident:
- •4. Complete an accident report (see annex) including the following items.
- •Case study - 5. Crew Injured by Pilot Ladder
- •1. Answer the questions
- •2. Match the following terms from the text with their definitions
- •3. Complete an accident report (see annex) covering the following items.
- •Case study - 6. Fatality inside chemical cargo tank
- •1. Answer the questions
- •3. Choose the factors which could become a reason of an accident and discuss them.
- •4. Complete an accident report (see annex) covering the following items.
- •Case study - 7. Stowaways
- •1. Answer the questions.
- •Give synonyms to the following expressions.
- •Give the antonyms to these expressions and use them in the sentences of your own.
- •5. Complete an incident report (see annex) covering the following items.
- •Part 5 environment related incidents
- •Case study - 1. Oil Spill during bunkering
- •1. Read the text. Analyze the situation yourself. Afterwards compare your opinion with the expert assessment.
- •1. Answer the questions.
- •2. Match the words from column a with the appropriate words from column b to form the collocations and use them in sentences of your own.
- •3. Complete the table. Mind the grammar. Do and don’t to prevent oil spill.
- •4. Complete an incident report (see annex) including the following items.
- •Case study – 2. Paint Pollution (harmful substances carried by sea in packaged form)
- •1. Answer the questions.
- •3. Decipher the following abbreviations.
- •4. Choose the reasons of the pollution incident.
- •5. Complete an incident report (see annex) including the following items.
- •Case study – 3.
- •1. Answer the questions.
- •2. Read the text and find a word or phrase in the text which means the following.
- •4.. Complete an incident report (see annex) including the following items.
- •Case study–4. Garbage
- •2. Explain the expressions in bold using English equivalents.
- •4. Read the text and find a word or phrase in the text which means.
- •5.Complete an incident report (see annex) including the following items.
4. Read the text and find a word or phrase in the text which means.
1. to render a decision;
2. ordinary citizen;
3. a ship constructed or adapted for carrying in bulk any liquid product;
4. to recognize or establish as being a particular person or thing;
5. Australian government agency responsible for enforcing Australian quarantine laws.
5.Complete an incident report (see annex) including the following items.
1. Description of the situation;
2. Direct, root causes of the situation;
3. Remedial actions and recommendations.
CHEMIKALIEN SEETRANSPORT GMBH |
HSSEQ Improvement Note |
- NEAR MISS REPORT - |
1. vessel GREEN POINT |
2. place (e.g. at sea / in port) IMMINGHAM |
3. number (will be assigned by DPA/QM) 06/10 |
4. description (describe WHAT happened and HOW it occurred) (documents attached: YES , number of pages 1 ], NO)
Deck cadet was ordered to tighten up some bolths on the manifold. Using force and Unadequate wrench/spanner he failed from the platform. He did not wear the protective Helmet. Fortunately, no mayor accident happened.
|
|
reported by (name/function): 2/O V KOROLEV
|
date / signature: 02.10.2010 |
5. immediate corrective action
Stop any action .
|
|
responsible person (name / function) C/O O SHUVALOV |
target date / date executed / signature 02.10.2010 |
6. root cause (determine WHY it did go wrong)
Not adequate hand tool wrench /spanner was used to do the job.
|
|
identified by (name / function): C/O O SHUVALOV |
date / signature 02.10.2010 |
7. corrective action (action taken / to be taken to prevent re-occurrence of the ROOT CAUSE)
Chief off. ordered only experienced persons to do such jobs where adequate knowledge an Absolutely must in order to do the job. Also, no persons to be on deck wearing no Protective gear (helmets, boiler suits, gloves etc.)
|
|
responsible person (name / function) C/O O SHUVALOV |
target date / date executed / signature 02.10.2010 |
8. verification of the implementation corrective and preventive action |
9. follow-up action status |
||
YES (if YES, specify WHEN, and by WHOM) NO
Immediate. Discussed Monthly PEC meeting . |
cleared NOT cleared |
||
name / function C/O O SHUVALOV |
date / signature |
name / signature C/O O SHUVALOV |
date / signature 02.10.2010 |
CHEMIKALIEN SEETRANSPORT GMBH |
HSSEQ Improvement Note |
- NEAR MISS REPORT - |
1. vessel GREEN POINT |
2. place (e.g. at sea / in port) AT SEA |
3. number (will be assigned by DPA/QM) 07/10 |
4. description (describe WHAT happened and HOW it occurred) (documents attached: YES , number of pages 1 ], NO)
At the about 2235 hrs LT, 3 officer on the bridge watch discovered vessel going Off course. At the same time Off Course alarm sounded. Steering switched over To second system and vessel proceeding without any problem. Next day first system Switched ON in order to check on it, and found all working well & without problems.
|
|
reported by (name/function): 3/O V ZOIDZE
|
date / signature: 06.10.2010 |
5. immediate corrective action
Immediatly Call to Master , Duty Eng., Ch.off –stby for use emergency steering .
|
|
responsible person (name / function) MASTER R .IGNATYEV |
target date / date executed / signature 06.10.2010 |
6. root cause (determine WHY it did go wrong)
In the standing orders inserting rule „Check and compare all compases frequently“ If doing so, any malfunction could be discovered well on time, even prior OFF course Alarm is signaling.
|
|
identified by (name / function): MASTER R .IGNATYEV |
date / signature 06.10.2010 |
7. corrective action (action taken / to be taken to prevent re-occurrence of the ROOT CAUSE)
Same as described above. Systems to be frequently checked/controled, and in next drydock System to be serviced by shore technician. |
|
responsible person (name / function) MASTER R .IGNATYEV |
target date / date executed / signature 06.10.2010 |
8. verification of the implementation corrective and preventive action |
9. follow-up action status |
||
YES (if YES, specify WHEN, and by WHOM) NO
Immediate. Discussed Monthly PEC meeting . |
cleared NOT cleared |
||
name / function MASTER R .IGNATYEV |
date / signature 06.10.2010 |
name / signature MASTER R .IGNATYEV |
date / signature 06.10.2010 |
CHEMIKALIEN SEETRANSPORT GMBH |
HSSEQ Improvement Note |
- NEAR MISS REPORT - |
1. vessel GREEN POINT |
2. place (e.g. at sea / in port) ROTTERDAM |
3. number (will be assigned by DPA/QM) 08/10 |
4. description (describe WHAT happened and HOW it occurred) (documents attached: YES , number of pages 1 ], NO)
Before departure ordered deck crew to remove vessel portable gangway from shore to her position .For this operation are used vessel crane ( on the middle ). Observed that one A.B. and one O.S do not wear protective helmets. |
|
reported by (name/function): 3/O V ZOIDZE
|
date / signature: 12.10.2010 |
5. immediate corrective action
Stopped lifting vessel gangway.When A.B & O.S wear protective helmets resumed secured vessel gangway. |
|
responsible person (name / function) C/0 O. SHUVALOV |
target date / date executed / signature 12.10.2010 |
6. root cause (determine WHY it did go wrong)
In case off wrong manouvre with crane, or broke gangway sling serious accident is possible
|
|
identified by (name / function): C/0 O. SHUVALOV |
date / signature 12.10.2010 |
7. corrective action (action taken / to be taken to prevent re-occurrence of the ROOT CAUSE)
For all persons when leave accommodation ( on therminals ,during cargo operations,bunkering ) must wearing protective gear (helmets, boiler suits, gloves etc.)
|
|
responsible person (name / function) C/0 O. SHUVALOV |
target date / date executed / signature 12.10.2010 |
8. verification of the implementation corrective and preventive action |
9. follow-up action status |
||
YES (if YES, specify WHEN, and by WHOM) NO
Immediate. Discussed Monthly PEC meeting . |
cleared NOT cleared |
||
name / function C/0 O. SHUVALOV |
date / signature 12.10.2010 |
name / signature C/0 O. SHUVALOV |
date / signature 12.10.2010 |
CHEMIKALIEN SEETRANSPORT GMBH |
HSSEQ Improvement Note |
- NEAR MISS REPORT - |
1. vessel GREEN POINT |
2. place (e.g. at sea / in port) AT SEA |
3. number (will be assigned by DPA/QM) 09/10 |
4. description (describe WHAT happened and HOW it occurred) (documents attached: YES , number of pages 1 ], NO)
In the morning the boatswain was ordered to remove the rust from the Radar mast.He did all preparations and he wore a safety belt but he forgot to attach it to the mast.While he was removing rust he suddenly slipped but he mannaged to grab the mast ladder step and no major accident occured. |
|
reported by (name/function): 3/O V ZOIDZE
|
date / signature: 30.10.2010 |
5. immediate corrective action
Stop any actions about working on the mast . |
|
responsible person (name / function) C/0 O. SHUVALOV |
target date / date executed / signature 30.10.2010 |
6. root cause (determine WHY it did go wrong)
Unadequate check of all safety equipment before starting work on Heights and arranging one person to assist man on height at all times.
|
|
identified by (name / function): C/0 O. SHUVALOV |
date / signature 30.10.2010 |
7. corrective action (action taken / to be taken to prevent re-occurrence of the ROOT CAUSE)
In the future no such jobs will be done before checking safety equipment by man who uses it and the man who assists.Also all protective gear should be worn at all times. |
|
responsible person (name / function) C/0 O. SHUVALOV |
target date / date executed / signature 30.10.2010 |
8. verification of the implementation corrective and preventive action |
9. follow-up action status |
||
YES (if YES, specify WHEN, and by WHOM) NO
Immediate. Discussed Monthly PEC meeting . |
cleared NOT cleared |
||
name / function C/0 O. SHUVALOV |
date / signature 30.10.2010 |
name / signature C/0 O. SHUVALOV |
date / signature 30.10.2010 |
CHEMIKALIEN SEETRANSPORT GMBH |
HSSEQ Improvement Note |
- NEAR MISS REPORT - |
1. vessel
|
2. place (e.g. at sea / in port)
|
3. number (will be assigned by DPA/QM)
|
4. description (describe WHAT happened and HOW it occurred) (documents attached: YES , number of pages 1 ], NO)
|
|
reported by (name/function):
|
date / signature:
|
5. immediate corrective action
|
|
responsible person (name / function)
|
target date / date executed / signature
|
6. root cause (determine WHY it did go wrong)
|
|
identified by (name / function):
|
date / signature
|
7. corrective action (action taken / to be taken to prevent re-occurrence of the ROOT CAUSE)
|
|
responsible person (name / function)
|
target date / date executed / signature
|
8. verification of the implementation corrective and preventive action |
9. follow-up action status |
||
YES (if YES, specify WHEN, and by WHOM) NO
Immediate. Discussed Monthly PEC meeting . |
cleared NOT cleared |
||
name / function
|
date / signature
|
name / signature
|
date / signature
|
NEAR ACCIDENT REPORT
Vessel: Report No.:
Description of incident/situation:
Date: 04.07. 2008 Place: CHIBA(JAPAN)
–---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Description:
during discharging cargo North West Shelf Condensate cargo operations was suspended 04.07.2008 at 16.18 LT Due IG Plant was not able to maintain IG positive pressure in cargo tanks. Vessel has to stop discharging to avoid vacumisation in cargo tanks. Cargo operation resumed 04.07.08 at 16.48 LT.
–----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Possible cause of incident/situation and possible consequences:
As a result vessel was on the verge of rejection and not acceptance by Japanese terminal in case of longer delay
–----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Which preventive measures have been taken (or proposal for preventive measure):
Cleaned and re-adjusted hand-regulating F.O. valve (MAXON). Cleaned and re-adjusted back-pressure regulating valve (SAFAG).
Date: 23.07.08 Place: at sea Name: C/E ______________________
–----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Master's decision/ plan for further handling of above accident:
As per attached C/E______________ technical descriptions
Date: 23.07.08 Place: at sea Master's signature__________________________
–---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Company's decision/ plan for further handling of above accident:
Date:______________ Place:_______________________
–---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Follow up control:
Remarks:
Preventive measures have been taken in accordance with the above:
Date:_______________ Place_________________________
FLEET CIRCULAR
1 Открытая форма договора спасания: договор, в котором не указывается размер вознаграждения за спасение на море или этот размер указывается только приблизительно. Наиболее популярная проформа – Ллойдовская, принятая в Великобритании в 2000 году.