- •Part 1. Near miss reports
- •Case study - 1. Pilot Ladder Insecure
- •1. Answer the questions.
- •2. Decide if the following statements are True or False. Correct the wrong ones.
- •3. Give synonyms to the given words. You may use more than one.
- •Read a near miss report (see a sample in annex).
- •Case study-2. Very Near Miss
- •Answer the questions.
- •Choose the factors which could become a reason of possible disaster and discuss them.
- •3. Decide whether these statements are true or false. Correct the wrong ones.
- •4. Read a near miss report (see a sample in annex). Complete a near miss report covering the following items.
- •Case study - 3. Irresponsible Actions (near collision)
- •1. Answer the questions.
- •2. Choose the factors which could become the reasons of possible collision between Panamax box ship and the inbound vessel.
- •3. Decide whether the statements are true (t) or false (f). Correct the wrong ones.
- •4. Divide the following actions between inbound and outbound vessels. Analyze the situation as if you were a harbor pilot. Make a short report
- •4. Read a near miss report (see a sample in annex).Complete a near miss report covering the following items.
- •Answer the questions.
- •Explain the following expressions.
- •3. Correct the mistakes.
- •Put the words in the correct order.
- •Read a near miss report (see a sample in annex).Complete a near miss report covering the following items.
- •Case study - 5. Unsafe Speed in Congested Area
- •1. Answer the questions.
- •2. Decipher the following abbreviations.
- •3. Find the appropriate words from the text which correspond to the following definitions.
- •4. Decide if these statements are true or false. Correct the wrong ones.
- •5. Complete the following table on non-compliance with colreGs.
- •6. Read a near miss report (see a sample in annex).Complete a near miss report covering the following items.
- •Case study - 6. Taking Avoiding Action too late (near collision)
- •1. Answer the questions.
- •2. Decide if these statements are true or false. Correct the wrong ones.
- •3. In the text, find the equivalents to the following expressions.
- •4. Decide which statements are referred to incident № 1 and which - to incident № 2.
- •5. Read a near miss report (see a sample in annex).Complete a near miss report covering the following items.
- •Case study - 7. Man Overboard
- •1. Answer the following questions.
- •2. Match the synonyms.
- •3. Explain the meaning of the following words and expressions.
- •4. Decide if these statements are true (t) or false (f)? Correct the wrong ones.
- •5. Read a near miss report (see a sample in annex). Complete a near miss report covering the following items.
- •Case study - 8. Lifeboat Lowered Unintentionally
- •1. Answer the questions.
- •2. Decide if these statements are true or false? Correct the false ones.
- •3. Explain the following terms.
- •4. Match words from column a with antonyms from column b.
- •5. Read a near miss report (see a sample in annex).Complete a near miss report covering the following items.
- •Case study - 9. Near Collision in Anchorage
- •1. Answer the questions.
- •2. Decide if these sentences are True or False. Correct the wrong ones.
- •3. Explain the following terms.
- •4. Match words from column a with their synonyms from column b.
- •5. Complete a near accident report (see annex) covering the following items.
- •Case study -10. Man overboard due to improper repair to pilot ladder
- •Answer the questions.
- •2. Define the purpose of the following aids.
- •Discuss with your partnet. Which of the factors could have led to fatality?
- •5. Complete a near accident report (see annex) covering the following items.
- •Case study - 11. ColreGs Violation (Rule 9)
- •1. Answer the questions.
- •2. In the text, find synonyms to the following words.
- •3. Find antonyms in the text to the following words.
- •4. Match the words in column a and the words in column b.
- •5. Decide if these statements are true or false? Correct the false ones.
- •6. Make up questions to the parts of the sentence in bold.
- •7. Complete a near miss report (see annex) covering the following items.
- •Case study -12. ColreGs Violation (Rule 10)
- •1. Answer the questions.
- •2. Find synonyms in the text to the following words.
- •3. Find antonyms in the text to the following words.
- •4. Match the words in column a and the words in column b.
- •5. Decide if these statements are True or False. Correct the false ones.
- •6. Make up questions to the part of the sentence in bold.
- •7. Complete a near miss report (see annex) covering the following items.
- •Case study -13. ColreGs violation in crossing situation
- •1. Answer the questions.
- •2. Decide if the following statements are True or False. Correct the false ones.
- •3. Complete a near miss report (see annex) covering the following items.
- •Part 2 cargo related incidents Cargo Damage, Loss or Shortage
- •Case study Case study - 1: Wetting of Logs (Cargo Damage)
- •1. Answer the questions.
- •2. Explain the following terms.
- •3. Decide if these statements are true (t) or false (f).Correct the wrong ones.
- •4. Choose the factors which could affect the stowage factor and stability condition of the tween-decker cargo ship.
- •5. Make up a cargo claim on behalf of consignee or a Sea Protest on behalf of the Master.
- •6. Complete an incident report (see annex) covering the following items.
- •Case study -2: Hazards of under-declared cargo weights in containers
- •1. Answer the questions.
- •2. Explain the following terms.
- •3. Decide whether the statements are true (t) or false (f). Correct the wrong ones.
- •4. Decipher the following abbreviations: ukc, sms
- •5. Choose the factors which could become reasons of danger of the vessel’s grounding in the channel.
- •6. Complete an incident report (see annex) covering the following items.
- •Case study - 3. Containers Overboard
- •1. Answer the questions.
- •2. Explain the function of the documents.
- •3. Decide whether the statements are true (t) or false (f). Correct the wrong ones.
- •4. Find synonyms for the following expressions in the text.
- •5. Compose a letter of protest on behalf of the Master on 6 containers missing while on route.Explain the cause.
- •6. Complete an incident report (see annex) covering the following items.
- •Case study - 4. Damage to Cargo in Severe Weather
- •1. Read the text. Analyze the situation yourself. Afterwards compare your opinion with the expert assessment.
- •2. Answer the questions.
- •3. Decipher the abbreviations and comment on them.
- •4. Match expressions in column a with their definitions in column b.
- •5. Decide whether the statements are true (t) or false (f). Correct the wrong ones.
- •6. Compose a sea protest on behalf of the Master.
- •7. Complete an incident report (see annex) covering the following items.
- •Vessel related incidents
- •1. Collision: Striking or being Struck by another Vessel regardless of whether Underway, Anchored or Moored
- •Case study - 1. Collision near Pilot Station
- •2. Area of high traffic density;
- •1. Answer the questions.
- •2. Decide if these sentences are true (t) or false (f). Correct the wrong ones.
- •Case study -2. Collision during Berthing
- •1. Answer the questions.
- •2. Decide if these statements are True or False? Correct the false ones.
- •3. Make up questions to get the following answers.
- •4. Complete the chart. Tick the person who is in charge of the collision during berthing.
- •Case study - 3. Collision in Congested Waters
- •2. Answer the following questions.
- •3. Decide if the following statements are True or False. Correct the wrong ones.
- •4. Explain the following terms
- •5. Complete the following table on non-compliance with colreGs.
- •6. Complete an incident report (see annex) covering the following items.
- •Case study -1. Contact with Gantry Crane
- •1. Read the text. Analyze the situation yourself. Afterwards compare your opinion with the expert assessment.
- •2. Answer the following questions.
- •3. Explain the following terms.
- •4. Decide if the following statements are True or False. Correct the wrong ones.
- •5. Find in the text the pilot’s commands to the vessel and the tug.
- •6. Complete an incident report (see annex) covering the following items.
- •Case study - 2. Contact with Berth during Strong Flood Tide
- •1. Read the text. Analyze the situation yourself. Afterwards compare your opinion with the expert assessment.
- •2. Answer the following questions.
- •3. Make up questions to parts of the sentence in bold.
- •4. Explain the following terms.
- •5. Decide if the following statements are True or False. Correct the wrong ones.
- •Case study - 1. Non-contact damage
- •Answer the questions.
- •Explain the following terms.
- •4. Grounding, Stranding and Foundering;
- •Case study -1. Grounding
- •Answer the questions.
- •Give English equivalents to the following definitions.
- •3. Complete an incident report (see annex) covering the following items.
- •Case study - 2. Stranding. Master under Pressure to Enter Port.
- •1. Answer the questions.
- •2. Explain the following terms.
- •3. Decide if these statements are True or False. Correct the wrong ones.
- •4. Complete an incident report (see annex) covering the following items.
- •5. Hull and Machinery – danger or failure of ship and/or its own equipment
- •1. Answer the questions.
- •2. Translate the expressions from English into Russian.
- •3. Say the dates, times and prices from the text. What do they refer to?
- •4. Put in the words from the box to describe the incident with the vessel.
- •5. What is hull and machinery insurance about? Put the sentences in the correct order of events from the text. The first event is given. Translate the sentences orally.
- •6. Complete an incident report (see annex) covering the following items.
- •6. Fire. Explosion This type of incidents involves machinery spaces or the living accommodation and the cargo being carried.
- •Case study - 1. Premature Reopening of Fire Area Causes Re-ignition
- •Case study - 2. Bagged Copra Fire
- •Answer the questions.
- •2. Explain the following terms.
- •Case study - 3. Collision and Explosion Kills Nine
- •1. Answer the questions on the text.
- •Choose between two vessels – a and b – to state what actions each of them performed.
- •Which of the officers below did the following actions?
- •4. Analyze the situation given in the text and state your arguments due to the following points:
- •5. Complete an accident report (see annex) covering the following items.
- •Part 4 people related incidents
- •Case study – 1. Mooring accident
- •1. Read the text. Analyze the situation yourself. Afterwards compare your opinion with the expert assessment.
- •2. Answer the questions.
- •3. Explain the following terms.
- •4. Complete an accident report (see annex) including the following items.
- •Case study – 2. Series of mis-steps end in the sea
- •1. Answer the questions.
- •2. Explain the following terms.
- •3. Decide whether the statements are True or False. Correct the wrong ones.
- •4. Complete the following statements.
- •5. Find in the text all life saving appliances. Name them, describe their function
- •6. Complete an accident report (see annex) covering the following items.
- •Case study – 3. Darkened workplace and an unprotected hazard to fatality
- •1. Answer the questions.
- •2. Decide whether the statements are True or False. Correct the wrong ones.
- •3. Match the words from column a with the appropriate words from column b to form the collocations and use them in sentences of your own.
- •4. Complete an accident report (see annex) covering the following items.
- •Case study - 4. Work aloft without precautions proves fatal
- •1. Answer the questions.
- •2. Match the words from column a with the appropriate words from column b to form the collocations and use them in sentences of your own.
- •3. Comment on the following factors which could cause the accident:
- •4. Complete an accident report (see annex) including the following items.
- •Case study - 5. Crew Injured by Pilot Ladder
- •1. Answer the questions
- •2. Match the following terms from the text with their definitions
- •3. Complete an accident report (see annex) covering the following items.
- •Case study - 6. Fatality inside chemical cargo tank
- •1. Answer the questions
- •3. Choose the factors which could become a reason of an accident and discuss them.
- •4. Complete an accident report (see annex) covering the following items.
- •Case study - 7. Stowaways
- •1. Answer the questions.
- •Give synonyms to the following expressions.
- •Give the antonyms to these expressions and use them in the sentences of your own.
- •5. Complete an incident report (see annex) covering the following items.
- •Part 5 environment related incidents
- •Case study - 1. Oil Spill during bunkering
- •1. Read the text. Analyze the situation yourself. Afterwards compare your opinion with the expert assessment.
- •1. Answer the questions.
- •2. Match the words from column a with the appropriate words from column b to form the collocations and use them in sentences of your own.
- •3. Complete the table. Mind the grammar. Do and don’t to prevent oil spill.
- •4. Complete an incident report (see annex) including the following items.
- •Case study – 2. Paint Pollution (harmful substances carried by sea in packaged form)
- •1. Answer the questions.
- •3. Decipher the following abbreviations.
- •4. Choose the reasons of the pollution incident.
- •5. Complete an incident report (see annex) including the following items.
- •Case study – 3.
- •1. Answer the questions.
- •2. Read the text and find a word or phrase in the text which means the following.
- •4.. Complete an incident report (see annex) including the following items.
- •Case study–4. Garbage
- •2. Explain the expressions in bold using English equivalents.
- •4. Read the text and find a word or phrase in the text which means.
- •5.Complete an incident report (see annex) including the following items.
1. Answer the questions
1. What was the cause of the chief officer's death?
2. What substance did the tanks contain?
3. What kind of operations was to be carried out before calling at the loading port?
4. Who was to be in charge of monitoring the tank cleaning?
5. Why is it necessary to provide accurate keeping of checklists and other documentation? What can inaccuracies lead to?
6. What procedures were to be done before entering an enclosed space?
2. Decide whether these statements are true or false. Correct the wrong ones.
1. The C/O died because of falling down the ladder during the tank cleaning procedure._________
2. The rest of vapours in tanks had the property of depriving oxygen from air._________________
3. As the C/O was a wathckeeper he didn't have to conduct pre-loading inspection of the empty tanks.______________
4. No Enclosed space drills should be provided before tank inspection._______________________
5. Appropriate signage at tank entrances should be provided to infrom the personnel that tanks may be deficient in oxygen._________
3. Choose the factors which could become a reason of an accident and discuss them.
-
Non-compliance with IMO Recommendations
-
Self-confidence
-
Fatigue
-
Lack of skills
-
Non-performance of drills
-
Law qualification of the C/O
-
Distractions caused by various factors in the course of working with documents
-
Lack of experience and training
4. Complete an accident report (see annex) covering the following items.
1. Description of the situation;
2. Direct, root causes of the situation;
3. Remedial actions and recommendations.
Case study - 7. Stowaways
A 6,600 GT purpose built heavy lift ship carried a full project cargo from Northern Europe to a West African port.The cargo was to be utilized as part of an inland oil and gas drilling and exploration project. A return cargo was to be loaded at the same terminal consisting of damaged or otherwise discarded items of oil drilling equipment, some containerized, which was being returned to the European headquarters for repair or disposal.
The ship had a Ship Security Plan in place. Gangway security was established but the gunwale of the ship was on the same level as the quayside such that people from ashore could step across the gap and didn’t use the gangway.The crew of nine, including master, used their best to control access but eventually conceded defeat.
On completionof loading the master solicited the help of the terminal managers and stevedore foremen to help him and the crew to conduct a thorough stowaway search. During a search which lasted two hours they found seven stowaways who were subsequently removed ashore. The ship sailed and after dropping the pilot the master dropped anchor and had the crew conduct a second stowaway search.
No more stowaways were found and the vessel commenced her voyage back to Northern Europe. However, one day later banging and shouting was heard from number two cargo hold and two young men / boys announced their presence. They did not have any identification documents on them and none was found subsequently. They did not speak a language which was understood by the master or any of the other officers and crew.The stowaways were uncooperative although they were not violent.
The master sought instructions from the ship operator and it was decided to continue towards the discharge port and try to repatriate the stowaways from Northern Europe.
On arrival at the discharge port the vessel was boarded by port State Control Inspectors who cited various alleged violations under the ISPS Code and delayed the entry of the ship for six days whilst they searched the ship and conducted a full scale security investigation.
Armed security guards were placed on board through discharge to stand guard over the stowaways until the ship sailed. The ship owners were presented with a bill for US$10,000 in respect of this 'security service'. The local immigration authorities refused to consider the possibility of repatriation through their country.
The true identity of the stowaways, and even confirmation of their nationality, could not be established and, consequently, no country visited by the ship would assist with attempts to repatriate them. The ship continued to face serious problems with alleged violations of security and ISPS Code wherever she went causing delays and consequential losses.