- •Учебный модуль «я – студент университета»
- •Тема 2. – Topic 2. Knowledge of your new world in a broader context: The universities of Europe
- •Раздел 4 – третья пара;
- •Раздел 5 и 6 рассчитаны на сугубо домашнюю работу;
- •Раздел 7 – лексический тест (по усмотрению преподавателя может быть как классной, так и домашней работой). Contents
- •Тopic 2 knowledge of your new world in a broader context: the universities of europe
- •I will know:
- •I will be able to:
- •1.1. Look at the map of Europe with some Universities marked. Do you know them? Pronounce their titles.
- •1.4 Read the material about Humboldt University - the type of university we call now “classical”. After reading answer the following questions:
- •Humboldt University
- •Классический университет
- •1.8. Study University criteria in Table 1.2. And range them according to your vision.
- •3.3. Perform a Round table on one of the topics given in 3.2.
- •Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
- •Mikhail vasilyevich lomonosov
- •4.4. Read about the format of a 5-minutes speech in Appendix 6.
- •Umberto eco
- •5.3. Fill in your table on self-assessment. Self-assessment table:
- •Fill in three columns by choosing proper words to certain notions.
- •Write down the tasks of the moderator of a round table from the most important to the less important ones. Organize them in three levels by filling in three columns.
- •Give a generalized word to each row of related words by continuing to fill in the table (the rows are taken from Roget’s Thesaurus. Numbers are references to other articles of the dictionary):
- •Write down one sentence using not less than 10 words from the vocabulary of our Topic 2.
- •Appendix 1. Types of universities
- •Appendix 2. Round table format rules Правила эффективного взаимодействия в формате «Круглый стол»
- •Appendix 3. Types of argumentation
- •Appendix 4. Paragraphing
- •Appendix 5 Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz
- •Information technology
- •Appendix 6. 5-minutes speech format
- •International public speaking competition: judging criteria
- •Verbal technique
- •Topic 2. Vocabulary Nouns presented in 2 groups of nouns:
- •Университеты, типы университетов,
- •Университеты, типы университетов, критерии оценки университетов, люди науки
- •2.Типология знаний
- •Adjectives
- •Adverbs
- •490 Знание
- •4.2. Text “Johann Wolfgang von Goethe”
- •Umberto Eco
Appendix 6. 5-minutes speech format
International public speaking competition: judging criteria
Audibility, presence on the platform, rapport with the audience, a coherently presented argument and demonstration of the ability to think on one's feet are all key elements in the competition. 11 is important that Speakers should not appear overprepared and spontaneity will earn them credit.
Speakers should remember that the competition offers them the opportunity to develop and demonstrate public speaking skills. When asking questions, other Speakers should remember that this is not a debate and there are no points for the questioner. Questions should therefore be questions and not statements.
The competition is about the participant's ability to speak in public, not their ability to speak English. Therefore the Judges are asked not to give undue weight to a Speaker's level of English but principally to judge their rhetorical skills. However, the competition organizers recognize that the competition presents a special challenge to Speakers whose native language is not English. The Judges therefore award a prize to the "Best Non-Native English Speaker". This prize is awarded entirely at the Judges' discretion to one of the Speakers in the final.
Use of notes
The use of notes is encouraged but Speakers who rely too heavily on their notes will be penalised. The Judges may penalise speeches which have been closely memorised. Speakers who do this should remember that their speech will lack spontaneity and should also bear in mind that answers to questions cannot be memorised!
JUDGING CRITERIA
Judges will assess a Speaker by reference to the following criteria:
1. Substance
2. Style and Technique
3. Questions
4. General Effectiveness
Substance
(Clarity, structure, focus, development, exposition, knowledge of subject, balance)
Irrelevance should be penalised, whereas carefully selected and relevant evidence will be rewarded.
The speech should hold the audience's attention and be clearly structured.
It should be evident from a good speech that the Speaker has carefully considered the topic. The Speaker should demonstrate an understanding of the issues involved and should develop these into a logical and balanced speech.
Judges should consider how the Speaker has chosen to approach the theme of the competition. Weak or frivolous interpretations are likely to be unsuccessful.
Style and Technique
(Delivery, posture, eye contact, use of gestures)
This section covers not what is said, but how it is said. Speakers are expected to display style and flair, but should avoid being overly pretentious. Speakers who give the impression of reading a script will be penalised.
The following areas should be considered by both the Speakers and Judges:
Oral technique
Speakers should take care to craft their oral presentation. In particular appropriate volume and tone of voice, pitch and pauses should be used, as well as appropriate eye-contact and gesture.