Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Lexikologia_Otvety_Ekzamen.docx
Скачиваний:
987
Добавлен:
08.02.2016
Размер:
100.24 Кб
Скачать

13. Affixation. Classifications of affixes. Productive and non-productive affixes, dead and living affixes.

Affixation (progressive derivation) is the formation of words by adding derivational affixes to stems.

Prefixation is the formation of words with the help of prefixes; does not change part of speech; is more typical of verb-formation (42%), e.g. a pretest, to coexist, to undo, impossible, asleep, to rewrite etc.

Suffixation is the formation of words with the help of suffixes; can change part of speech; is characteristic of noun-, adjective- and adverb-formation, e.g. an employee, childish, quietly, to specify etc.

Types of affixes According to the position in a word, affixational morphemes fall into:

prefixes – derivational affixes standing before the stem and modifying its meaning, e.g. ex-minister, in-sensitive, re-read etc.; about 51 in the system of Modern English;

suffixes – derivational affixes following the stem and forming a new derivative within the same part of speech (e.g. king-dom, book-let, child-hood etc.) or in a different word class (e.g. do-er, wash-able, sharp-en etc.);

infixes – affixational morphemes placed within a word, e.g –n– in stand.

Synchronic vs diachronic differentiation of affixes:

living affixes are easily separated from the stem, e.g. re-, -ful, -ly, un-, -ion, de- etc.;

dead affixes have become fully merged with the stem and can be singled out by a diachronic analysis of the development of the word, e.g. admit < Lat. ad+mittere;

Productive vs non-productive affixes:

productive affixes take part in word-formation in modern English, e.g. -er, -ing, -ness, -ism, -ance, un-, re-, dis-, -y, -ish, -able, -ise, -ate;

non-productive affixes are not active in word-formation in modern English, e.g. –th, -hood, -some, -en;

non-productive affix == dead affix

14.Word-composition. Types of compound words. Criteria for their classification.

Word-composition (compounding) is the formation of words by morphologically joining two or more stems.

A compound word is a word consisting of at least two stems which usually occur in the language as free forms, e.g. university teaching award committee member.

The compound inherits most of its semantic and syntactic information from its head, i.e. the most important member of a compound word modified by the other component.

The structural pattern of English compounds

[ X Y] y

X = {root, word, phrase}, Y = {root, word}, y = grammatical properties inherited from Y

Criteria for classification.

according to the type of the linking element (compounds without a linking element, e.g. toothache, bedroom, sweet-heart;compounds with a vowel linking element, e.g. handicraft, speedometer;compounds with a consonant linking element, e.g. statesperson, craftsman; compounds with a preposition linking stem, e.g. son-in-law, lady-in-waiting;compounds with a conjunction linking stem, e.g. bread-and-butter.)

according to the type of relationship between the components (in coordinative (copulative) compounds neither of the components dominates the other, e.g. fifty-fifty, whisky-and-soda, driver-conductor;in subordinative (determinative) compounds the components are neither structurally nor semantically equal in importance but are based on the domination of one component over the other, e.g. coffeepot, Oxford-educated, to headhunt, blue-eyed, red-haired)

according to the way of composition (compound proper is a compound formed after a composition pattern, i.e. by joining together the stems of words already available in the language, with or without the help of special linking elements, e.g. seasick, looking-glass, helicopter-rescued, handicraft;derivational compound is a compound which is formed by two simultaneous processes of composition and derivation; in a derivational compound the structural integrity of two free stems is ensured by a suffix referring to the combination as a whole, e.g. long-legged, many-sided, old-timer, left-hander)

according to the structure of immediate constituents (those consisting of simple stems: film-star; those with at least one of the constituents being a derived stem: chain-smoker; those with at least one of the constituents being a clipped stem: V-day, FBI-agent. those with at least one of the constituents being a compound stem: wastepaper-basket. )

according to the semantic relations between the constituents. (non-idiomatic compounds, whose meanings can be described as the sum of their constituent meanings, e.g. a sleeping-car, an evening-gown, a snowfall; compounds one of the components of which has undergone semantic derivation, i.e. changed its meaning, e.g. a blackboard, a bluebell; idiomatic compounds, the meaning of which cannot be deduced from the meanings of the constituents, e.g. a ladybird, a tallboy, horse-marine. The bahuvrihi compounds (Sanskrit ‘much riced’) are idomatic formations in which a person, animal or thing is metonymically named after some striking feature (mainly in their appearance) they possess; their word-building pattern is an adjectival stem + a noun stem, e.g. bigwig, fathead, highbrow, lowbrow, lazy-bones.)

Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]