
- •1. Lexicology as a branch of linguistics; its aims and significance. Links with other branches of linguistics.
- •2.Words of native origin and their distinctive features.
- •3.Borrowings. The distinction between the terms origin of borrowing and source of borrowing. Translation loans. Semantic loans.
- •4. Types of borrowed elements in the English vocabulary. Etymological doublets, hybrids, international words, and folk etymology.
- •5.Assimilation of borrowings. Types and degrees of assimilation
- •6.Latin borrowings. Periods of borrowings from Latin.
- •7.Celtic elements in the English vocabulary.
- •8.Scandinavian loan-words in Modern English.
- •9.French elements in the English vocabulary. Periods of borrowings from French.
- •10.Greek borrowings. Features of Greek borrowings.
- •11. The morphemic structure of English words. Types of morphemes. The principles of morphemic analysis.
- •12. The derivative structure of English words. The distinction between morphological stem and derivational base. Derivational fields.
- •13. Affixation. Classifications of affixes. Productive and non-productive affixes, dead and living affixes.
- •14.Word-composition. Types of compound words. Criteria for their classification.
- •15.Shortening. Types of shortening
- •16. Conversion. Different views on conversion. Semantic relations within converted pairs.
- •17.Non-productive ways of word-formation.
- •18 Semasiological and onomasiological perspectives of the English lexicon
- •19 Approaches to the definition of word meaning: functional, referential and others
- •20.. Types of word meaning.
- •21. Semantic change and transference of meaning.
- •22. A theory of semantic field. Thematic groups.
- •23.Neologisms. Their sources and formation.
- •24. Polysemy. Semantic structure of English words. Diachronic and synchronic approaches to polysemy.
- •25.Homonyms. Classifications and sources of homonyms.
- •26.Syntagmatic and paradigmatic relations among English words.
- •27. Synonyms. Types of synonyms. Sources of synonymy.
- •28. Antonyms. Definition. Morphological and semantic classifications of antonyms.
- •29. Grammatical and lexical valency. Grammatical and lexical context.
- •30.Free word-groups. Definition. Classifications.
- •31. Discrepancies between free word-groups and phraseological units.
- •32..Phraseological units: a variety of terms and the problem of definition. Characteristic features of phraseological units.
- •33..Classifications of phraseological units.
- •34. Polysemy, synonymy and stylistic features of phraseological units.
- •35.. Origins and sources of phraseological units.
- •36..Standard English: features and the problem of definition.
- •37.. Local dialects in the British Isles. Scotticisms in Standard English.
- •38 Chief characteristic features of the American English lexicon.
- •40..Types of Dictionaries
- •41 The main problems in lexicography.
29. Grammatical and lexical valency. Grammatical and lexical context.
Lexical valency is the aptness of a word to appear in various collocations, i.e. in combinations with other words. The lexical valency of correlated words in different languages is not identical. Both the E. plant and Ukr. рослина may be combined with a number of words denoting the place where the flowers are grown, e.g. garden plants, hot-house flowers, etc. (cf. Ukr. садові рослини, оранжерейні рослини, etc.). The English word, however, cannot enter into combination with the word room to denote plants growing in the rooms (cf. pot plants — кімнатні рослини).
The interrelation of lexical valency and polysemy:
the restrictions of lexical valency of words may manifest themselves in the lexical meanings of the polysemantic members of word-groups, e.g. heavy, adj. in the meaning ‘rich and difficult to digest’ is combined with the words food, meals, supper, etc., but one cannot say *heavy cheese or *heavy sausage;
different meanings of a word may be described through its lexical valency, e.g. the different meanings of heavy, adj. may be described through the word-groups heavy weight / book / table; heavy snow / storm / rain; heavy drinker / eater; heavy sleep / disappointment / sorrow; heavy industry / tanks, and so on.
From this point of view word-groups may be regarded as the characteristic minimal lexical sets that operate as distinguishing clues for each of the multiple meanings of the word.
Grammatical valency is the aptness of a word to appear in specific grammatical (or rather syntactic) structures. Its range is delimited by the part of speech the word belongs to. This is not to imply that grammatical valency of words belonging to the same part of speech is necessarily identical, e.g.
the verbs suggest and propose can be followed by a noun (to propose or suggest a plan / a resolution); however, it is only propose that can be followed by the infinitive of a verb (to propose to do smth.);
the adjectives clever and intelligent are seen to possess different grammatical valency as clever can be used in word-groups having the pattern: Adj. + Prep. at + Noun (clever at mathematics), whereas intelligent can never be found in exactly the same word-group pattern.
The individual meanings of a polysemantic word may be described through its grammatical valency, e.g.
keen + N as in keen sight ‘sharp’; keen + on + N as in keen on sports ‘fond of’; keen + V(inf) as in keen to know ‘eager’.
30.Free word-groups. Definition. Classifications.
A word-group is a combination of at least two meaningful words joined together according to the rules of a particular language.
Words in word-groups are not “free” because their syntagmatic relationships are governed, restricted and regulated, on the one hand, by requirements of logic and common sense and, on the other, by the rules of grammar and combinability.
Distribution is the range of positions in which a linguistic unit can occur, e.g. the noun issue can appear in various combinations:
Adj. + issue: burning, central, critical, crucial, key, vital; controversial, difficult, thorny; economic, moral, political, social, technical, theoretical;
V. + issue: raise; debate, discuss; decide, settle; address, consider, deal with, examine; clarify; focus on; highlight; avoid, evade.
Semantic combinability of words is based on the meanings of words. It is conditioned by the nature of the denotata of words, i.e. it reflects the connections, relations and associations between objects, properties or events in reality. Semantic links between the combining words serve as a basis for free word-groups.
Semantic agreement is the presence of common semantic features (semes) and the absence of contradictory semantic features in the combining words; it is the basic law of semantic combinability. Consider the example below:
*The yellow idea cut the tree.
*Colourless green ideas sleep furiously.
The appearance of words in a certain syntagmatic succession with particular logical, semantic, morphological and syntactic relations is called collocability or valency.
Valency is viewed as an aptness or potential of a word to have relations with other words in language. Valency can be grammatical and lexical.
Collocability is an actual use of words in particular word-groups in communication.