Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Aircraft_design.pdf
Скачиваний:
662
Добавлен:
03.06.2015
Размер:
15.01 Mб
Скачать

APPENDIX D

Case Studies

Midrange Aircraft (Airbus 320 class)

All computations carried out herein follow the book instructions. The results are not from the Airbus industry. Airbus is not responsible for the figures given here. They are used only to substantiate the book methodology with industry values to gain confidence. The industry drag data are not available but, at the end, it will be checked if the payload-range matches the published data.

Given: LRC Speed and Altitude: Mach 0.75 at 36,089 ft.

Dimensions (to scale the drawing for detailed dimensions)

Fuselage length = 123.16 ft (scaled measurement differs slightly from the drawings) Fuselage width = 13.1 ft, Fuselage depth = 13 ft.

Wing reference area (trapezoidal part only) = 1,202.5 ft2; add yehudi area = 118.8 ft2

Span = 11.85 ft; MACwing = 11.64 ft; AR = 9.37; 1/ = 25 deg; CR = 16.5 ft,

4

λ = 0.3

H-tail reference area = 330.5 ft2; MACH-tail = 8.63 ft V-tail reference area = 235.6 ft2; MACV-tail = 13.02 ft Nacelle length = 17.28 ft; Maximum diameter = 6.95 ft Pylon = measure from the drawing

Reynolds number per ft is given by:

Reper foot = (Vρ)= (aMρ)= [(0.75 × 968.08)(0.00071)]/

(0.7950 × 373.718 × 109)

= 1.734 × 106 per foot

Drag Computation

Fuselage

Table D1 gives the basic average 2D flat plate for the fuselage, CFfbasic = 0.00186. Table D2 summarizes the 3D and other shape-effect corrections, CFf, needed to estimate the total fuselage CFf.

580

Appendix D

581

Figure D1. Airbus 320 three-view with major dimensions (Courtesy of Airbus)

582

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Appendix D

 

Table D1. Reynolds number and 2D basic skin friction CFbasic

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reference

Wetted area

Characteristic

Reynolds

 

 

 

Parameter

area (ft2)

(ft2)

length (ft)

number

2D CFbasic

 

Fuselage

n/a

4,333

123.16

2.136 × 108

0.00186

 

 

Wing

1,202.5

2,130.94

11.64

(MACw)

2.02 × 107

0.00255

 

 

V-tail

235

477.05

13.02

(MACVT)

2.26

× 107

0.00251

 

 

H-tail

330.5

510.34

8.63 (MACHT)

1.5

× 107

0.00269

 

 

2 × nacelle

n/a

2 × 300

17.28

 

3

× 107

0.00238

 

 

2 × pylon

n/a

2 × 58.18

12 (MACp)

2.08

× 107

0.00254

 

Table D2. Fuselage CFf correction (3D and other shape effects)

Item

CF f

% of CF f basic

Wrapping

0.00000922

0.496

Supervelocity

0.0001

5.36

Pressure

0.0000168

0.9

Fuselage-upsweep of 6 deg

0.000127

6.8

Fuselage-closure angle of 9 deg

0

0

Nose-fineness ratio

0.000163

8.7

Fuselage nonoptimum shape

0.0000465

2.5

Cabin pressurization/leakage

0.000093

5

Passenger windows/doors

0.0001116

6

Belly fairing

0.000039

2.1

Environmental Control System Exhaust

0.0000186

1

Total CF f

0.0006875

36.9

Therefore, the total fuselage CF f = CF f basic + CF f

= 0.00186 + 0.0006875 =

0.002547.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Flat-plate equivalent

ff

(see Equation 9.8)

=

C

F f

×

A

w f =

0.002547

×

4333

=

11.03 ft2.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Add the canopy drag fc = 0.3 ft2.

 

 

 

 

 

11.33 ft

2

.

 

 

 

Therefore, the total fuselage parasite drag in terms of f f +c =

 

 

 

 

Wing

Table D1 gives the basic the average 2D flat plate for the wing, CFwbasic = 0.00257, based on the MACw .

The important geometric parameters include the wing reference area (trapezoidal planform) = 1,202.5 ft2 and the gross wing planform area (including Yehudi) = 1,320.8 ft2. Table D3 summarizes the 3D and other shape-effect corrections needed to estimate the total wing CFw .

Table D3. Wing CFw correction (3D and other shape effects)

Item

CFw

% of CFwbasic

Supervelocity

0.000493

19.2

Pressure

0.000032

1.25

Interference (wing–body)

0.000104

4.08

Excrescence (flaps and slats)

0.000257

10

Total CFw

0.000887

34.53

 

 

 

Therefore, the total wing: CFw = CFwbasic + CFw = 0.00257+0.000889 = 0.00345.

Appendix D

583

Flat-plate equivalent: fw (Equation 9.8) = CFw × Aww = 0.00345 × 2,130.94 = 7.35ft2.

Vertical Tail

Table D1 gives the basic average 2D flat plate for the V-tail:

CFVTbasic = 0.00251 based on the MACVT; V-tail reference area = 235 ft2

Table D4 summarizes the 3D and other shape-effect corrections ( CFVT) needed to estimate the V-tail CFVT.

Table D4. V-tail CFVT correction (3D and other shape effects)

Item

CFVT

% of CFVTbasic

Supervelocity

0.000377

15

Pressure

0.000015

0.6

Interference (V-tail – body)

0.0002

8

Excrescence (rudder gap)

0.0001255

5

Total CFVT

0.000718

28.6

 

 

 

Therefore, the V-tail: CFVT = CF VTbasic + CFVT = 0.00251 + 0.000718 = 0.003228 Flat-plate equivalent fVT (see Equation 9.8) = CFVT × AwVT = 0.003228 × 477.05 = 1.54ft2.

Horizotal Tail

Table D1 gives the basic average 2D flat plate for the H-tail:

CFHTbasic = 0.00269, based on the MACHT; the H-tail reference area SHT = 330.5 ft2

Table D5 summarizes the 3D and other shape-effect corrections ( CFHT) needed to estimate the H-tail CFHT.

Table D5. H-tail CFHT correction (3D and other shape effects)

Item

CF HT

% of CF HTbasic

Supervelocity

0.0004035

15

 

Pressure

0.0000101

0.3

 

Interference (H-tail – body)

0.0000567

2.1

 

Excrescence (elevator gap)

0.0001345

5

 

Total CF HT

0.000605

22.4

 

 

 

 

Therefore, the H-tail: CF HT = CF HTbasic

+ CF HT = 0.00269 + 0.000605 =

0.003295

 

 

 

Flat-plate equivalent fHT (see Equation 9.8) = CFHT×AwHT = 0.003295×510.34 = 1.68 ft2.

Nacelle, CFn

Because the nacelle is a fuselage-like axisymmetric body, the procedure follows the method used for fuselage evaluation but needs special attention due to the throttledependent considerations.

Important geometric parameters include:

Nacelle length = 17.28 ft

Maximum nacelle diameter = 6.95 ft

584

Appendix D

Average diameter = 5.5 ft

Nozzle exit-plane diameter = 3.6 ft

Maximum frontal area = 37.92 ft2

Wetted area per nacelle Awn = 300 ft2

Table D1 gives the basic average 2D flat plate for the nacelle: CFnbasic = 0.00238, based on the nacelle length

Table D6 summarizes the 3D and other shape-effect corrections, CFn, needed to estimate the total nacelle CFn for one nacelle.

For nacelles, a separate supervelocity effect is not considered because it is accounted for in the throttle-dependent intake drag; pressure drag also is accounted for in the throttle-dependent base drag.

Table D6. Nacelle CFn correction (3D and other shape effects)

Item

CFn

% of CFnbasic

Wrapping (3D effect)

0.0000073

0.31

Excrescence (nonmanufacture)

0.0005

20.7

Boat tail (aft end)

0.00027

11.7

Base drag (aft end)

0

0

Intake drag

0.001

41.9

Total CFn

0.001777

74.11

 

 

 

Thrust Reverser Drag

The excrescence drag of the thrust reverser is included in Table D6 because it does not result from manufacturing tolerances. The nacelle is placed well ahead of the wing; hence, the nacelle–wing interference drag is minimized and assumed to be zero.

Therefore the nacelle: CFn = CFnbasic + CFn = 0.00238 + 0.001777 = 0.00416

Flat plate equivalent fn (Equation 9.8) = CFnt × Awn = 0.00416 × 300 = 1.25 ft2 per nacelle.

Pylon

The pylon is a wing-like lifting surface and the procedure is identical to the wing para- site-drag estimation. Table D1 gives the basic average 2D flat plate for the pylon; CFpbasic = 0.0025 based on the MACp.

The pylon reference area = 28.8 ft2 per pylon. Table D7 summarizes the 3D and other shape-effect corrections ( CFp) needed to estimate CFp (one pylon).

Table D7. Pylon CFp correction (3D and other shape effects)

Item

CFp

% of CFpbasic

Supervelocity

0.000274

10.78

Pressure

0.00001

0.395

Interference (pylon–wing)

0.0003

12

Excrescence

0

0

Total CFp

0.000584

23

 

 

 

Therefore, the pylon CFp = CFpbasic + CFp = 0.0025 + 0.00058 = 0.00312 Flat-plate equivalent: fp (see Equation 9.8) = CFp × Awp = 0.182 ft2 per pylon.

Appendix D

585

Roughness Effect

The current production standard tolerance allocation provides some excrescence drag. The industry standard uses 3% of the total component parasite drag, which includes the effect of surface degradation in use. The value is froughness = 0.744 ft2, given in Table D8.

Trim Drag

Conventional aircraft produce trim drag during cruise and it varies slightly with fuel consumption. For a well-designed aircraft of this class, the trim drag of ftrim = 0.1 ft2 may be used.

Aerial and Other Protrusions

For this class of aircraft, faerial = 0.005 ft2.

Air-Conditioning

This is accounted for in the fuselage drag as ECS exhaust. It could provide a small amount of thrust.

Aircraft Parasite Drag Buildup Summary and CDpmin

Table D8 provides the aircraft parasite drag buildup summary in tabular form.

Table D8. Aircraft parasite drag buildup summary and CDpmin estimation

 

Wetted

 

 

 

 

 

 

area Aw ft2

Basic CF

CF

Total CF

f (ft2)

CDpmin

Fuselage + undercarriage

4,333

0.00186

0.00069

0.00255

11.03

0.00918

fairing

 

 

 

 

 

 

Canopy

 

 

 

 

0.3

0.00025

Wing

2,130.94

0.00255

0.00089

0.00346

7.35

0.00615

V-tail

477.05

0.00251

0.00072

0.00323

1.54

0.00128

H-tail

510.34

0.00269

0.00061

0.0033

1.68

0.0014

2 × Nacelle

2 × 300

0.00238

0.00178

0.00415

2.5

0.00208

2 × Pylon

2 × 58.18

0.00254

0.000584

0.00312

0.362

0.0003

Rough (3%)

 

 

 

 

0.744

0.00062

Aerial

 

 

 

 

0.005

0.000004

Trim drag

 

 

 

 

0.1

0.00008

 

TOTAL

 

 

 

25.611

0.0213

Notes:

CDpmin = 0.0213.

Wing reference area Sw =1,202 ft2; CDpmin = f/Sw ISA day; 36,089-ft altitude; and Mach 0.75.

CDp Estimation

The CDp is constructed, corresponding to the CL values, as given in Table D9.

Table D9. CDp estimation

CL

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

CDp

0.00044

0

0.0004

0.0011

0.0019

Induced Drag, CDi

The wing aspect ratio:

AR = span2 = (111.2)2/1, 320 = 9.37 gross wing area

586 Appendix D

induced drag, C = CL2 = 0 034C2

Di π AR . L

Table D10 gives the CDi corresponding to each CL.

Table D10. Induced drag

CL

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

CDi

0.00136

0.00306

0.00544

0.0085

0.01224

0.0167

0.0218

Total Aircraft Drag

Aircraft drag is given as:

CD = CDpmin + CDp + CDi + [CDw = 0]

The total aircraft drag is obtained by adding all the drag components in Table D11. Note that the low and high values of CL are beyond the flight envelope.

Table D11. Total aircraft drag coefficient, CD

CL

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

CDpmin

 

0.0213 from Table 7.9

 

CDp

0.00038

0

0.0004

0.0011

0.0019

CDi

0.00136

0.00306

0.00544

0.0085

0.01224

Total aircraft CD

0.0231

0.02436

0.02714

0.0309

0.03544

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table D11 is drawn in Figure D2 to show that the PIANO software aircraft drag checks out well with what is manually estimated in this book; hence, the PIANO value is unchanged.

Figure D2. Aircraft drag polar at LRC

Engine Rating

Uninstalled sea-level static thrust = 25,000 lb per engine.

Installed sea-level static thrust = 23,500 lb per engine.

Weight Breakdown (with variations)

Design cruise speed, VC = 350 KEAS

Design dive speed, VD = 403 KEAS

Design dive Mach number, MD = 0.88

Appendix D

587

Limit load factor = 2.6

Ultimate load factor = 3.9

Cabin differential pressure limit = 7.88 psi

Component

Weight (lb)

Percentage of MTOW

Wing

14,120

 

Flaps + slats

2,435

 

Spoilers

380

 

Aileron

170

 

Winglet

265

 

Wing group total

17,370

(above subcomponent weights from [10])

Fuselage group

17,600

(Torenbeek’s method)

H-tail group

1,845

 

V-tail

1,010

 

Undercarriage group

6,425

 

Total structure weight

44,250

 

Power plant group (two)

15,220

 

Control systems group

2,280

 

Fuel systems group

630

 

Hydraulics group

1,215

 

Electrical systems group

1,945

 

Avionics systems group

1,250

 

APU

945

 

ECS group

1,450

 

Furnishing

10,650

 

Miscellaneous

4,055

 

MEW

83,890

 

Crew

1,520

 

Operational items

5,660

 

OEW

91,070

 

Payload (150 × 200)

30,000

 

Fuel (see range calculation)

41,240

 

MTOW

162,310

 

This gives:

Wing-loading = 162,310/1,202.5 = 135 lb/ft2

Thrust-loading = 50, 000/162310 = 0.308

The aircraft is sized to this with better high-lift devices.

Payload Range (150 Passengers)

MTOM – 162,000 lb

Onboard fuel mass: 40,900 lb

Payload – 200 × 150 = 30,000 lb

LRC: Mach 0.75, 36,086 feet (constant condition)

Initial cruise thrust per engine: 4,500 lb

Final cruise thrust per engine: 3,800 lb

Average specific range: 0.09 nm/lb fuel

Climb at 250 KEAS reaching to Mach 0.7

588

Appendix D

Figure D3. Aircraft performance

Summary of the Mission Sector

Sector

Fuel consumed (lb)

Distance covered (nm)

Time elapsed (min)

 

 

 

 

Taxi out

200

0

8

Takeoff

300

0

1

Climb

4,355

177

30

Cruise

28,400

2,560

357

Descent

370

105

20

Approach/land

380

0

3

Taxi in

135

0

5

Total

34,140

2,842

424

 

 

 

 

Diversion-fuel calculation:

diversion distance = 2,000 nm, cruising at Mach 0.675 and at 30,000-ft altitude Diversion fuel = 2,800 lb; contingency fuel (5% of mission fuel) = 1,700 lb

Holding-fuel calculation:

Holding time = 30 min at Mach 0.35 and at a 5,000-ft altitude Holding fuel = 2,600 lb

Total reserve fuel carried = 2,800 + 1,700 + 2,600 = 7,100 lb. Total onboard fuel carried = 7,100 + 34,140 = 41,240 lb.

Cost Calculations (U.S.$ – Year 2000)

Number of passengers

150

Yearly utilization

497 trips per year

Mission (trip) block time

7.05 hrs

Mission (trip) block distance

2,842 nm

Mission (trip) block fuel

34,140 lb (6.68 lbs/U.S. gallons)

Appendix D

589

Fuel cost = 0.6 U.S.$ per U.S. gallon

Airframe price = $38 million

Two engines price = $9 million

Aircraft price = $47 million

Operating costs per trip – AEA 89 ground rules for medium jet-transport aircraft:

Depreciation

$6,923

Interest

$5,370

Insurance

$473

Flight crew

$3,482

Cabin crew

$2,854

Navigation

$3,194

Landing fees

$573

Ground handling

$1,365

Airframe maintenance

$2,848

Engine maintenance

$1,208

Fuel cost

$3,066 (5,110.8 U.S. gallons)

Total DOC

$31,356

DOC/block hour

$4,449

DOC/seat

$209

DOC/seat/nm

0.0735 U.S.$/seat/nm

Readers may compare this with data available in the public domain.

APPENDIX E

Tire Data (Courtesy of Goodyear Tire Co.)

Appendix E on tire data is found on the Web at www.cambridge.org/Kundu

590

Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]