Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Aircraft_design.pdf
Скачиваний:
692
Добавлен:
03.06.2015
Размер:
15.01 Mб
Скачать

10.7 Engine Integration with an Aircraft: Installation Effects

335

Figure 10.19. Typical wing-mounted turboprop installation

from the engine after deducting the losses is sufficient for the full flight envelope as specified. In hot and high-altitude conditions, it becomes critical at takeoff if the runway is not sufficiently long and/or there is an obstruction to clear. In that case, an aircraft may take off with lighter weight. Airworthiness requirements require that an aircraft maintain a minimum gradient (see Chapter 11) at takeoff with its critical engine inoperative (customer requirements may demand more than the minimum).

Following are the obligations of designers when installing an engine and integrating it with an aircraft:

Generate the external and internal contours of the nacelle. Multiengines are either wing-mounted (i.e., larger aircraft) or fuselage-mounted (i.e., smaller aircraft).

Compute the compressor air-bleed for the ECS (e.g., cabin air-conditioning and pressurization, de-icing and anti-icing, and other purposes).

Compute power off-takes from the engine shaft to drive the electric generator, accessories, and so forth.

Substantiate for the certifying agencies that the thrust available from the installed engine is sufficient for the full flight envelope.

Current developments involve laminar flow control over the external surface of the intake duct and technologies for noise and emission reduction.

10.7.2 Turboprop Integration to Aircraft

This section is a basic description of the subject and is intended only for coursework. The discussion highlights the technical challenges but exacting details are beyond the scope of this book. Turboprop nacelle design is subjected to the same considerations as the turbofan design. A turboprop nacelle is also a multifunctional system consisting of (1) an inlet, (2) an exhaust nozzle, and (3) a noise-suppression system. Thrust-reversing can be achieved by sufficiently changing the propeller pitch angle. There are two primary types of turboprop nacelles, as shown in Figure 10.19. The scoop intake can be above or below (as a chin) the propeller spinner. It is interesting that several turboprop nacelles have integrated the undercarriage mount with storage space in the same nacelle housing, as shown in Figure 10.19a. The other type has an annular intake, as shown in Figure 10.19b. Installation losses are on the same order as those discussed for a turbofan installation.

A turboprop’s nacelle position is dictated by the propeller diameter. The key geometric parameters for a wing-mounted turboprop installation are shown in Figure 10.20.

336

Aircraft Power Plant and Integration

Figure 10.20. Typical parameters for a wingmounted turboprop installation

Typically, there can be one fourth of the propeller-diameter gap between the fuselage and the propeller tip and between other propeller tips if there are four engines. The overhang should be as far forward as the design can accommodate (like the turbofan overhang) to reduce interference drag – at least a quarter to nearly one wing-chord length is sufficient. For a high-wing aircraft, the turboprop nacelle is generally underslung, especially if it also houses the undercarriage (e.g., the Bombardier Q400). For a low-wing aircraft, the nacelle is generally over the wing to give the propeller ground clearance. The propeller slipstream assists lift and has a strong effect on static stability; flap deployment aggravates the stability changes. Depending on the extent of wing incidence relative to the fuselage, there is some angle between the wing-chord line and the thrust line – typically, from 2 to 5 deg.

A fuselage-mounted, propeller-driven system is shown in Figure 10.21. The angle between the thrust line and the wing-chord line is the same as a wing-mounted, propeller-driven nacelle. Sometimes the propeller axis has about a 1-deg downward inclination relative to the fuselage axis. These parameters assist longitudinal stability. An inclination of 1 or 2 deg in the yaw direction can counter the propeller slipstream. Otherwise, the V-tail can be inclined to counter the effect.

A piston engine nacelle on the wing follows the same logic. Older designs had a more closely coupled installation.

10.7.3 Combat Aircraft Engine Installation

Combat aircraft have engines that are integral to the fuselage, mostly buried inside; however, in cases with two engines, they can bulge out to the sides. Therefore, pods are not featured unless having more than two engines on a large aircraft is required.

Figure 10.21. Typical flight parameters for a fuselage-mounted turboprop installation

10.7 Engine Integration with an Aircraft: Installation Effects

337

Figure 10.22. Engine installed in a combat aircraft

Figure 10.22 shows a turbofan installed on a supersonic combat aircraft. In this case, it is buried inside the fuselage with a long intake duct. The external contour of the engine housing is integral to the fuselage mould lines. The internal contours of the intake and exit nozzle are the responsibility of aircraft designers in consultation with engine manufacturers.

Early designs had the intake at the front of the aircraft: the pitot type for subsonics fighters (e.g., the Sabrejet F86) and with a movable center body (i.e., bullet translates forward and backward) for supersonic fighters (e.g., the MIG 21). The long intake duct snaking inside the fuselage below the pilot’s seat incurs high losses. The side-intake superceded the nose-intake designs. Possible choices for side intakes are described in Section 4.19 – primarily, they are either side-mounted or chin-mounted. The intake is placed on a plate above the fuselage boundary layer. A center body is required for aircraft-speed capability above Mach 1.8; otherwise, it can be a pitot intake, and boundary layer plates can act as the center body.

Web Figure 10.25 shows the various flow regimes associated with supersonic intake. To install and integrate an engine in a military aircraft, designers are faced with the same considerations as for a civil aircraft design, but the technology is more complex. Designers must make justifiable choices based on the following:

Design the engine intake and its internal contour and compute the intake losses plus those from supersonic shock waves. Multiengines are side by side.

Design the engine exit nozzle and its internal contour and compute the noz- zle losses. Military aircraft nozzle design is complex and addressed in Section 10.10.4.

Suppression of exhaust temperature for a stealth aircraft incurs additional losses at the intake and the nozzle.

Compute the compressor air-bleed for the ECS (i.e., cabin air-conditioning and pressurization, de-icing and anti-icing, and other purposes). The extent of the air-bleed is less than in a civil aircraft because there is no large cabin environment to control.

Compute the power off-takes from the engine shaft to drive the electric generator and accessories (e.g., pumps).

Substantiate to the certifying agencies that the thrust available from the engine – after deducting the off-take losses – is sufficient for the full flight envelope.

Military aircraft have excess thrust (with or without AB) to accommodate hot and high-altitude conditions and to operate from short airfields; they can climb at a steeper angle than civil aircraft.

Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]