|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DNA |
SYNTHESIS |
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BOX 1.2 |
(Continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exonucleases remove nucleotides from the ends of DNA. Most cleave single nu- |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
cleotides one at a time off one end of the DNA. For example, Exonuclease III carries |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
out steps like |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
ApCpGp |
——— pTpApA |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
3 |
TpGpCp |
|
——— pApTpT |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
5 |
Ap |
CpGp ——— pTpA–OH |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
3 |
HO–GpCp ——— pApTpT |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
5 |
ApCpGp |
——— pT–OH |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
3 |
HO– Cp |
|
——— pApTpT |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
and continues until there are no double-stranded regions left. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Terminal transferases add nucleotides at the 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
-end of a DNA |
strand. They |
require |
|
|||||||
that |
this end |
not have a 3 |
-phosphate. No |
|
template is required; hence |
the |
sequence of |
|
|
|||||||
the incorporated residues is random. However, if only a single type of pppdN is used, |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
then a set of homopolymeric products is produced |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
GpApTpCpA |
|
pppdT |
9 |
|
|
GpApTpCpA: |
(pT) |
|
n |
|
||||
|
|
|
tranferase |
|
|
|
||||||||||
where |
n |
is variable. Some DNA polymerases |
(Box |
|
1.6) also |
have |
a terminal |
trans- |
|
|
||||||
ferase activity (see Box 1.5). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Separately synthesized DNA strands can be combined to yield synthetic double helices. The specificity and strength of base pairing will ensure the formation of the correct duplexes under almost all circumstances if the two strands can form 8 or more base pairs.
As shown in Figure 1.6 |
b, |
synthetic DNA duplexes can be strung together, and nicks in the |
||
polynucleotide backbone can be sealed with the enzyme DNA ligase. This enzyme re- |
||||
quires a 5 |
-phosphate group and |
a free 3 |
-OH in order to form a phosphodiester bond |
|
(Box 1.2). There are two commonly used forms of the enzyme: the species isolated from |
||||
Escherichia coli |
uses NAD as an energy source, while the bacteriophage T7 enzyme re- |
|||
quires ATP. Thermostable ligases isolated from thermophilic organisms are also available. |
||||
Their utility will be demonstrated later. |
|
|||
Once a duplex DNA is available, it can be immortalized by cloning it into an appropri- |
||||
ate vector (see Box 1.3). Duplexes (or single strands) can also be amplified in vitro by |
||||
methods such as the polymerase chain reaction (Chapter 4). The result is that for any de- |
||||
sired species, a chemical synthesis needs only to be done once. Thereafter biological or |
||||
enzymatic methods usually suffice to keep up the supply of product. It remains to be seen |
||||
in the future, as larger stocks of specific synthetic DNA sequences accumulate world- |
||||
wide, whether it is worthwhile to set up a distribution system to supply the potentially |
||||
millions of different compounds to |
interested users, or whether it will be simpler and |
|||
cheaper to manufacture a needed compound directly on site. |
|
|||
By taking advantage of the specificity of base pairing, it is possible to synthesize and as- |
||||
semble more complex DNA structures than those that predominate in nature. Naturally oc- |
||||
curring DNAs are |
either circles with |
no |
ends or linear duplexes |
with two protected ends. |
12 DNA CHEMISTRY AND BIOLOGY
BOX 1.3
CLONING DNAs IN BACTERIAL PLASMIDS
AND BACTERIOPHAGE
Cloning is the process of making many identical cells (or organisms) from a single precursor. If that precursor contains a target DNA molecule of interest, the cloning process will amplify that single molecule into a whole population. Most single-cell organisms are clonal. Their progeny are identical replicas. Cloning can also be done by manipulating single, immortal, or immortalizable cells of higher organisms including plants and animals. Here we concentrate on bacterial cloning, which can be carried out
in a large number of different species but often involves the favorite laboratory organ-
ism |
Escherichia |
coli. |
|
|
|
Cloning |
DNA |
requires |
three components: the target DNA of interest, a vector |
DNA |
that will |
accommodate the |
target as an insertion and that contains a replication |
|
origin for it to be propagated indefinitely, and a host cell that will replicate the vector and its insert. The simplest early cloning systems used two types of vectors, either plasmids, which are small DNAs that can replicate independently of the host cell DNA, or bacteriophages, which also have independently replicating DNA systems. Plasmids are usually double-stranded circular DNAs. Bacteriophages can be circular
or linear, single stranded, or double stranded. Here we illustrate the steps in cloning
double strands. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The vector is usually designed so that it has a unique cutting site for a particular |
||||||
restriction enzyme. Digestion linearizes the vector |
and produces |
two |
ends, usually |
||||
with |
the same overhanging |
sequence. |
The target |
is cut with |
the |
same |
enzyme, |
or |
alternatively, with a |
different |
enzyme that |
nevertheless |
leaves |
the |
same over- |
hangs. A complex target will yield many fragments, only a few of which may be of interest.
When the vector and target are mixed, they can anneal and form suitable substrates
of DNA ligase. Depending on the relative concentrations |
used, and whether the 5 |
- |
|
phosphate ends produced by the restriction nuclease |
are left intact or are removed with |
|
|
a phosphatase, a variety of different products |
combining targets and vectors will be |
||
formed. A number of tricks exist to bias the ligation in |
favor of particular 1: 1 |
target- |
|
vector adducts. For example, in the scheme above a single target and vector can come together in two different polarities. More complex schemes allow the polarity to be preselected.
(continued)
DNA SYNTHESIS |
13 |
BOX 1.3 (Continued)
Next the vector-target adduct must be |
reintroduced |
into |
the |
bacterial |
cells. |
|
|
Depending on the vector, different procedures are used. If the vector is a plasmid, the |
|
||||||
bacterial cells are made permeable by chemical, enzymatic, electrical, or mechanical |
|
||||||
procedures. When mixed with DNA, these bacteria take up some of the vector before |
|
|
|||||
the gaps in their surfaces can be resealed. The process is called |
|
|
transformation |
or |
|||
transfection. |
Very similar procedures can be used to introduce DNA into other kinds of |
|
|||||
cells. The efficiencies vary widely depending on |
the type of vector, |
type |
of cell, |
and |
|
||
the procedures used for permeabilization. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the vector is a bacteriophage, it is usually preferable to repackage the vector-tar- |
|
||||||
get adduct in vitro and then allow the assembled cells to infect the host cells naturally. |
|
||||||
This increases the efficiency of delivering DNA into the host cells, both because bacte- |
|
|
|||||
riophage insertion is often quite effective and because there is no need to permeabilize |
|
||||||
the host cells, a process that frequently kills many of them. |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Traditionally microbiological screening systems are used to detect host cells propa- |
|
|
|||||
gating cloned DNA. If a dilute suspension of bacteria is allowed |
to coat the |
surface of |
|
|
|||
a culture dish, colonies will be observed after several days of growth, each of which |
|
||||||
represents cloned progeny arising from a single cell. The cloning process can be used |
|
|
|||||
to introduce markers that aid in the selection |
or screening of bacteria carrying plas- |
|
|||||
mids of potential interest. For example, the plasmid may carry a gene that confers re- |
|
||||||
sistance to an |
antibiotic so that only host cells containing the plasmid will be able |
to |
|
||||
grow on a culture medium in which that antibiotic is placed. The site at which the vec- |
|
|
|||||
tor is cut to introduce the target can disrupt |
a gene that yields a colored metabolic |
|
|||||
product when the precursor of that product is present in the medium. Then vectors that |
|
|
|||||
have been designated as having no target insert will still yield colored colonies, while |
|
||||||
those containing a target insert will appear white. |
|
|
|
|
|
||
When a bacteriophage vector is used, the same sets of selection and screening systems |
|
|
|||||
can be used. If |
the bacteriophage shows efficient |
lysis, that |
is, if infected cells |
disrupt |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(continued)
14 |
DNA CHEMISTRY AND BIOLOGY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BOX 1.3 |
(Continued) |
|
|
|
and release bacteriophage, then a convenient method of cloning is to grow a continu- |
|
|||
ous layer of susceptible bacteria and then cover the culture with a thin layer of dilute |
|
|||
bacteriophage suspension. Individual bacteriophage will infect cells, leading to contin- |
|
|||
ual cycles of bacteriophage growth and cell lysis until visible holes in the bacterial |
|
|||
lawn, called bacteriophage plaques, are observed. Individual colonies or plaques are |
|
|||
selected for further study by picking, literally by sampling with a sterile toothpick or |
|
|||
other |
sharp |
object, and then reinnoculated, respectively, into a |
permissive growth |
|
medium or strain. |
|
|
||
A key variable in the choice of vector is the range of target sizes that can be accom- |
|
|||
modated. Plasmids generally allow a broad range of target sizes, while bacteriophages, |
|
|||
because of constraints in the packaging process, generally accept only a narrow range |
|
|||
of target sizes. The earliest cloning vectors were efficient for relatively small targets, |
|
|||
under 10 kb. Progressively interest has turned to ever larger targets, specialized vec- |
|
|||
tor/host systems needed to propagate such targets are described later (Boxes 2.3 and |
|
|||
8.2). |
|
|
|
|
A second key variable in the choice of cloning vector is the copy number. Some |
|
|||
plasmids and |
bacteriophages can grow in tens of thousands of copies per |
E. coli |
cell. |
|
This |
greatly |
facilitates recovery and purification of cloned DNA inserts. However, if |
|
|
DNA fragments toxic to the host are the desired targets, a high copy number vector |
|
|||
system will make it more difficult for them to be propagated. |
|
|
||
The major advantages of cloning, as compared to the in vitro replication systems |
|
|||
discussed in Chapter 4, are the ability to handle very large numbers of samples in par- |
|
|||
allel and the absence of a need for any prior knowledge about the desired target se- |
|
|||
quences. The major disadvantages of cloning are that it is a relatively time-consuming |
|
|||
process difficult to automate, and some DNA sequences are not cloneable either be- |
|
|||
cause they are toxic to particular hosts, or they are unstable in those |
hosts and frag- |
|
||
ments rearrange or delete. |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
However, sequences can be designed that associate to give specific structures with three, four, or more ends. These are called DNA junctions (Fig. 1.7). Similar four-stranded struc-
tures |
are |
actually |
seen in |
cells as intermediate steps in genetic recombination. However, |
||
these |
so-called Holliday structures are unstable, since the participating strands are pairs of |
|||||
identical |
sequences. The |
location of the junction can move around by |
a process |
called |
||
branch migration. |
|
Synthetic junctions can be designed that are |
stable because their DNA |
|||
sequences do not |
allow branch migration. At low salt concentrations these structures |
be- |
||||
come relatively flat, as indicated in Figure 1.7; at higher salt concentrations they form an X-
shaped structure with one pair of co-axially stacked helices crossing over a |
second |
pair |
of |
|||
co-axially stacked helices. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Still other types of DNA structures can be formed by taking advantage of |
the |
fact |
that |
|||
in the double helix, specific hydrogen bond donor and acceptor sites on the bases remain |
||||||
exposed in the major groove of the double helix. Under appropriate conditions this allows |
||||||
the association of a third DNA strand in a sequence-specific manner |
to |
form |
a |
DNA |
||
triplex. It produces a DNA structure with four ends. The great utility of |
triplexes, |
which |
||||
we will exploit in considerable detail later (Chapter 14), is that |
triplexes |
can |
be formed |
|||
DNA AS A FLEXIBLE SET OF CHEMICAL REAGENTS |
15 |
Figure 1.7 DNA structures with more than two ends.
and broken under conditions that do not particularly alter the stability of duplexes but facilitate the sequence-specific manipulation of DNA.
DNA AS A FLEXIBLE SET OF CHEMICAL REAGENTS
Our ability to synthesize and replicate almost any DNA is encouraging novel applications of DNAs. Two examples will be sketched here: the use of DNAs as aptamers and the use
of DNAs in nanoengineering. Aptamers are molecules selected to have high affinity bind-
ing to a preselected target. The plasticity of single-stranded nucleic acids polymers combined with the affinity of complementary bases to base pair provides an enormous poten-
tial for variation in three-dimensional (tertiary) structure. These properties have been taken advantage of to identify nucleic acids that bind tightly to specific ligands. In this approach random DNA or RNA libraries are made by synthesizing 60 to 100 base vari-
able compositions. DNAs |
and RNAs are ideal aptamers because powerful methods |
exist |
|
|
||
to work with very complex mixtures of species and to purify from these mixtures just the |
|
|||||
molecules with high affinity for a target from which to characterize the common features |
|
|||||
of these classes of molecules. These cycles of design and optimization form |
the heart of |
|||||
any engineering process. (See Chapter 14 for a detailed discussion.) |
|
|
|
|||
The goal, in nanoengineering is to make machines, motors, transducers, and |
tools at |
|||||
the molecular level. It is really the ultimate chemical synthesis, since entire arrays of mol- |
||||||
ecules (or atoms) must be custom designed for specific mechanical or electromagnetic |
|
|||||
properties. The potential advantages of using DNAs for such purposes is due to several |
|
|||||
factors: the great power to synthesize DNAs of any desired length and sequence, the abil- |
||||||
ity to make complex twoand three-dimensional arrays using Holliday junctions, and the |
|
|||||
formation |
of structures |
of accurate length by taking advantage of the great stiffness |
of |
|||
duplex DNA. (See |
Box |
1.4.) Proteins can be anchored along the DNA at |
many |
points |
|
|
to create |
arrays |
with |
more complex properties. The disadvantages of using |
DNA |
and |
|
16 |
|
DNA CHEMISTRY |
AND |
BIOLOGY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
proteins |
for nanoengineering is that these structures are mechanically |
easier |
to |
|
deform |
|
|||||||||||
than typical atomic or molecular solids; they usually require an aqueous environment, and |
|||||||||||||||||
they have relatively limited electrical or mechanical properties. There |
are |
two potential |
|
||||||||||||||
ways to circumvent the potential disadvantages of DNA in nanoengineering. One is to use |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
DNA (and proteins) to direct the assembly of other types of molecules with the desired |
|
||||||||||||||||
properties needed to make engines or transducers. A second is to use the DNA as a resist: |
|
||||||||||||||||
to cast a solid surface or volume around it, remove the DNA, and then use the resulting |
|||||||||||||||||
cavity as a framework for the placement of other molecules. In both applications DNA is |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
really conceived of as the ultimate molecular scaffold, with adjustable lengths and shapes. |
|
||||||||||||||||
Time |
will |
tell if this fantasy can be ever realized in practice. A simple |
test |
of |
the |
use |
of |
||||||||||
DNA to control the spacing of two proteins is described in Box 1.4. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Our |
powerful |
ability |
to |
manipulate |
DNA is |
really just |
hinted |
at |
|
by |
some |
of |
||||
the above discussion. We know most of the properties of short DNA molecules; our |
|
||||||||||||||||
ability |
to make quantitative predictions about the properties |
of |
unknown |
sequences |
|||||||||||||
is |
not |
bad. What makes the problem of managing cellular DNAs |
difficult |
is |
their |
|
|||||||||||
enormous size. The DNAs of small viruses have thousands of base pairs. Bacterial |
|
||||||||||||||||
chromosomal DNA molecules are typically 1 to 10 million base pairs (0.3–3.0 mm) |
|||||||||||||||||
long. Human |
chromosomal |
DNAs |
range in size from about 0.5 |
to |
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
108 base |
|||||||
pairs. The largest DNA molecules in nature may approach a billion base pairs, which |
|
||||||||||||||||
corresponds to molecular weights of almost a trillion Daltons. These are indeed large |
|
||||||||||||||||
molecules; just describing their sequence in any detail, if we knew it, would be a |
|||||||||||||||||
formidable task. What is impressive is that all DNAs, from the |
largest to the small- |
||||||||||||||||
est, can be analyzed by a small number of very similar physical and genetic techniques |
|||||||||||||||||
(Chapters |
3–5). |
However, |
it is the |
recent |
development of |
some |
physical |
methods |
|||||||||
that have moved biological experimentation beyond the study of the relatively few or- |
|
||||||||||||||||
ganisms with well-developed genetic systems. The results of these |
experiments |
indi- |
|
||||||||||||||
cate that the biology of a large number of organisms seems to fall along very similar |
|
||||||||||||||||
lines. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BOX 1.4
POTENTIAL USE OF DNA IN NANOENGINEERING
As a test case for nanoengineering with DNA, we have explored the use of DNA as a spacer of known length between two sites with biological functionality. The immunological problem which motivated this work was a desire to understand the complex set
of molecular interactions that occurs when an antigen-presenting cell is recognized by a T lymphocyte. Antigen is presented as peptide bound to a cell surface molecule known as a major histocompatibility molecule, in complex with associated accessory membrane proteins. The detection is done by the clonetypic T cell receptor: a complex membrane protein that also can associate with other accessory proteins. Our current
picture of this interaction is summarized in Figure 1.8. To refine this picture, we need to determine the structure of the complex, to decide what elements in this structure pre-exist on the cell surface in associated form in each of the participating cells before
they become engaged, and to monitor the fate of the components during and after engagement. Because the complex of proteins involved in antigen presentation is so
(continued)
|
DNA AS A FLEXIBLE SET OF CHEMICAL REAGENTS |
17 |
BOX 1.4 |
(Continued) |
|
large, it is difficult to study cellular interaction by short-range methods such as energy transfer or crosslinking. Thus we must seek to make longer molecular rulers that can span distances of up to 100 Å or more.
The idea is to make pairs of antibodies or antibody combining sites separated by DNA spacers. Monoclonal antibodies exist for many chemical structures (epitopes) on the molecules present on the surfaces of T cells or antigen-presenting cells. The two approaches used to link such antibodies are shown schematically in Figure 1.9. The key point in both approaches is that separate, complementary DNA single strands are conjugated to particular antibodies or fragments. Then pairs of these conjugates are mixed, and the double-he- lix formation directs the specific production of heterospecific antibody conjugates. The length of the DNA double helix is 3.4 Å per base pair. Thus a 32-base DNA duplex will
be about 100 Å long. It is expected to behave as an extremely rigid structure with respect to lateral bending, but it can undergo torsional twisting. Thus, while the distance between the tethered antibodies should be relatively fixed, the angle between them may be variable. This should help both sites reach their targets simultaneously on the same cell surface. The actual utility of such compounds remains to be established, but it is interesting that it is possible to make such constructs relatively easily.
Figure 1.8 Schematic illustration of the recognition of an antigen-presenting cell by a T lymphocyte, a key step in the immune response. The antigen-presenting cell has on its surface mole-
cules of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) which have bound an antigen (black chain). The T cell has specific receptors (TCR’s) that recognize a particular MHC molecule and its bound peptide. Both cells have accessory proteins (dotted) that assist the recognition.
(continued)
18 DNA CHEMISTRY AND BIOLOGY
BOX 1.4 (Continued)
Figure 1.9 |
Use |
of DNA molecules |
as spacers |
to construct long molecular rulers. |
(a) Symbols |
|
used. |
(b) |
Noncovalent |
coupling. |
(c) |
Covalent coupling. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BASIC |
DNA |
BIOLOGY |
|
19 |
BASIC |
DNA |
BIOLOGY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DNA is the essential store of genetic information in the cell. That information must be |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
duplicated to be passed to daughter cells by the process known as |
|
|
|
|
|
replication. |
It must |
be |
||||||||
read out as an RNA copy by the process known as |
|
|
|
|
transcription |
so |
that this |
copy (after |
|
|||||||
editing in many cases) can be used to direct the synthesis of proteins. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
DNA replication is limited by the fact that all of the known enzymes that can faithfully |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
copy the information encoded in DNA have very restricted properties. Such enzymes are |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
called |
|
DNA polymerases. |
|
They all require a 3 |
-ended nucleic acid (or a protein substitut- |
|
|
|||||||||
ing for this 3 |
-end) as a primer, and a template strand, which is copied. They cannot initi- |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
ate synthesis de novo but can |
only elongate a strand defined by |
a primer (Figure 1.10). |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
They can, for the most part, copy a DNA strand all of the way to its end. Accurate replica- |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
tion cannot depend on base pairing specificity alone because the |
thermodynamic |
differ- |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
ence between the stability of a single base pair and a mismatch is not very great (Chapter |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
3). Editing is used to correct any misincorporated bases. Some |
of this editing is carried |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
out by the DNA polymerase itself. A |
newly incorporated |
mispaired |
base can |
be excised |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
by the |
3 |
-exonuclease activity of most DNA polymerases. Some |
enzymes also have a 5 |
|
|
|
|
- |
||||||||
exonuclease activity that degrades any DNA strands in front of a wave of new synthesis. |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
This process is called |
nick translation. |
|
Other enzymes that lack this |
activity will |
displace |
|
|
|||||||||
one strand of a duplex in order to synthesize a new strand. This process is called |
|
|
|
|
strand |
|||||||||||
displacement. |
These enzyme activities are illustrated in Box 1.5. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Special procedures are used to synthesize the primers needed to start DNA replication. |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
For example, RNA primers can be used and then degraded to result in a complete DNA |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
strand. Both strands of DNA must be replicated. The unidirectional mode of DNA poly- |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
merases makes this process complicated, as shown in Figure 1.11. In a single-replication |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
fork the synthesis of one strand (the leading strand), once initiated, can proceed in an un- |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
interrupted fashion. The other strand (the lagging strand) must be made in a retrograde |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
fashion from periodically spaced primers, and the resulting fragments are then stitched |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
together. Most replication processes employ not a single fork but a bidirectional pair of |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
replication forks, as shown in Figure 1.11. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Any DNA replication process poses an interesting topological problem, whether it is |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
carried out by a cell or in the laboratory. Because the two DNA strands are wound about a |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
common axis, the helix axis, they are actually also twisted around each other. They cannot |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
be unwound without rotation of |
the structure, once for each helix turn. Thus |
DNA |
must |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
spin as it is being replicated. In the bacterium |
|
|
E. coli, |
for example, the rate of replication |
|
|||||||||||
is fast enough to make a complete copy of the chromosomal |
DNA in about 40 minutes. |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Since the chromosome contains almost 5 million base pairs of DNA, the required replica- |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
tion rate is 1.2 |
105 |
base pairs per minute. Since |
|
|
E. coli |
uses a pair of bidirectional replica- |
|
|||||||||
tion forks, each must move at |
6 |
104 |
bases |
per minute. Thus each side of the replication |
|
|
||||||||||
fork |
must |
unwind |
6 |
103 helical |
turns |
per |
minute: |
it |
must |
rotate |
at 6 |
|
|
103 |
rpm. |
|
Figure 1.10 Primer extension by DNA polymerase in a template-directed manner. The newly synthesized strand is shown as a dashed arrow.
20 DNA CHEMISTRY AND BIOLOGY
BOX 1.5
PROPERTIES OF DNA POLYMERASES
DNA polymerases play the central role in how cells replicate accurate copies of their DNA molecules. These enzymes also serve to illustrate many of the basic properties of other enzymes that make an RNA copy of DNA, a DNA copy of an RNA, or replicate RNAs. In the laboratory DNA polymerases are an extraordinarily useful tool for many of the most common ways in which DNAs are manipulated or analyzed experimentally. All DNA polymerases can extend a primer along a template in a sequence specific manner.
Most polymerases have one or more additional |
activities. A 3 |
|
-exonuclease activity |
will prevent the use of mispaired primers. This activity, essentially looks backward as |
|
||
the polymerase proceeds, and if an incorrect base is inserted, |
the polymerase pauses to |
|
|
remove it. In the absence of pppdN’s, the 3 |
|
-exonuclease activity |
will progressively |
shorten the primer by removing nucleotides one at a time, even though they are correctly base-paired to the template.
Many DNA polymerases have a 5 -exonuclease activity. This degrades any DNA ahead of the site of chain extension. The result is the progressive migration of a nick in
the strand complementary to the template. Thus this activity is often called nick translation.
(continued)
