Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5565_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
13.10.2026
Размер:
977 Кб
Скачать
☆
ADVERSE EFFECTS OF TRANSFUSION 77
Septic Reactions
AABB Bacterial Contamination Task Force. Bacterial contamination of platelets:
Summary for clinicians on potential management issues related to transfusion recip-
ients and blood donors. Bethesda, MD: AABB, 2005.
Blajchman MA. Bacterial contamination and proliferation during the storage of cel-
lular blood products. Vox Sang 1998;74(Suppl 2):155-9.
Blajchman MA, Beckers EAM, Dickmeiss E, et al. Bacterial detection of platelets:
Current problems and possible resolutions. Transfus Med Rev 2005;19:259-72.
Chiu EK, Yuen KY, Lie AK, et al. A prospective study of symptomatic bacteremia fol-
lowing platelet transfusion and of its management. Transfusion 1994;34:950-4.
Fatal bacterial infections associated with platelet transfusions—United States, 2004.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2004;54(07):168-70.
Kuehnert MJ, Roth VR, Haley R, et al. Transfusion-transmitted bacterial infection in
the United States, 1998 through 2000. Transfusion 2001;41:1493-9.
Ness PM, Braine H, King K, et al. Single-donor platelets reduce the risk of septic
platelet transfusions. Transfusion 2001;41:857-61.
Perez P, Salmi LR, Gilles F, et al, for the BACTHEM Group and the French Haemov-
igilance Network. Determinants of transfusion-associated bacterial contamination:
Results of the French BACTHEM case-control study. Transfusion 2001;41:862-72.
Sazama K. Bacteria in blood for transfusion: A review. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1994;
118:350-65.
Yomtovian R, Brecher ME. pH and glucose testing of single-donor apheresis plate-
lets should be discontinued in favor of a more sensitive detection method. Transfu-
sion 2005;45:646-7.
TA-GVHD
Anderson KM. Broadening the spectrum of patient groups at risk for transfusion-
associated GVHD: Implications for universal irradiation of cellular blood compo-
nents. Transfusion 2003;43:1652-4.
Becker J, Shaz B for the Clinical Transfusion Medicine Committee and the Transfu-
sion Medicine Section Coordinating Committee. Guidelines for patient blood man-
agement and blood utilization. Bethesda, MD: AABB, 2011:37.
Greenbaum BH. Transfusion-associated graft-versus-host disease: Historical per-
spectives, incidence and current use of irradiated blood products. J Clin Oncol
1991;9:1889-902.
Leitman SF, Tisdale JF, Bolan CD, et al. Transfusion-associated GVHD after fludara-
bine therapy in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus. Transfusion 2003;43:
1667-71.
78 PRACTICAL SELF-ASSESSMENT FOR TRANSFUSION MEDICINE PROFESSIONALS
Ohto H, Anderson KC. Survey of transfusion-associated graft-versus host disease in
immunocompetent recipients. Transfus Med Rev 1996;10:31-43.
Petz LD, Calhoun L, Yam P, et al. Transfusion-associated graft-versus host disease in
immunocompetent patients: Report of a fatal case associated with transfusion of
blood from a second-degree relative, and a survey of predisposing factors. Transfu-
sion 1993;33:742-50.
Schroeder ML. Transfusion-associated graft-versus-host disease. Br J Haematol
2002;117:275-87.
Hypotension Associated with Bedside Leukocyte Reduction Filters
Food and Drug Administration. Notice: Hypotension and bedside leukocyte reduc-
tion filters. (May 4, 1999) Rockville, MD: Center for Devices and Radiologic Health,
1999.
Fried MR, Eastlund T, Christie B, et al. Hypotensive reactions to white cell-reduced
plasma in a patient undergoing angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy.
Transfusion 1996;36:900-3.
Hume AH, Popovsky MA, Benson K, et al. Hypotensive reactions: A previously
uncharacterized complication of platelet transfusion? Transfusion 1996;36:904-9.
Posttransfusion Purpura
McFarland JG. Posttransfusion purpura. In: Popovsky M, ed. Transfusion reactions.
4th ed. Bethesda, MD: AABB Press, 2012 (in press).
Transfusion-Transmitted Diseases
General: Viral Risks
Schrieber GB, Busch MP, Kleinman SH, Korelitz JJ, for the Retrovirus Epidemiology
Donor Study. The risk of transfusion-transmitted viral infections. N Engl J Med
1996;334:1685-90.
Hepatitis B
Kleinman SH, Strong DM, Tegtmeier GGE, et al. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA
screening of blood donations in minipools with the COBAS AmpliScreen HBV test.
Transfusion 2005;45:1247-57.
Kuhns MC, Kleinman SH, McNamara AL, et al. Lack of correlation between HBsAg
and HBV DNA levels in blood donors who test positive for HBsAg and anti-HBc:
Implications for future HBV screening policy. Transfusion 2004;44:1332-9.
Stramer SL. Pooled hepatitis B virus DNA testing by nucleic acid amplification:
Implementation or not. Transfusion 2005;45:1242-6.
ADVERSE EFFECTS OF TRANSFUSION 79
Hepatitis C
Busch MP, Glynn SA, Wright DJ, et al, for the NHLBI-REDS NAT Study Group. Rela-
tive sensitivities of licensed nucleic acid amplification tests for detection of viremia
in early human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus infection. Transfusion
2005;45:1853-63.
Food and Drug Administration. Draft guidance for industry: Current good manufac-
turing practice for blood and blood components: 1) Quarantine and disposition of
prior collections from donors with repeatedly reactive screening tests for hepatitis C
virus (HCV); 2) Supplemental testing, and the notification of consignees and transfu-
sion recipients of donor test results for antibody to HCV (anti-HCV). (June 17, 1999)
Rockville, MD: CBER Office of Community Outreach and Development, 1999.
Food and Drug Administration. Draft guidance for industry: Nucleic acid testing
(NAT) for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and hepatitis C virus
(HCV): Testing, Product disposition, and donor deferral and reentry. (July 19, 2005)
Rockville, MD: CBER Office of Community Outreach and Development, 2005.
Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry: Use of nucleic acid tests on
pooled and individual samples from donors of whole blood and blood components
(including source plasma and source leukocytes) to adequately and appropriately
reduce the risk of transmission of HIV-1 and HCV. (November 21, 2004) Rockville,
MD: CBER Office of Community Outreach and Development, 2004.
Lafrere J-J, Girot R, Lafrere F, et al. Complete or partial seroconversion in immuno-
competent individuals after self-limited HCV infection: Consequences for transfu-
sion. Transfusion 2004;44:343-8.
National Institutes of Health. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development
Conference panel statement: Management of hepatitis C. Hepatology 1997;26:2S-
10S.
Operskalski EA, Mosley JW, Tobler LH, et al, for the Transfusion-Transmitted Viruses
Study and the Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study. HCV viral load in anti-HCV-
reactive donors and infectivity for their recipients. Transfusion 2003;43:1433-41.
Hepatitis G
Alter HJ, Gallagher M, Morris TT, et al. Acute non-A-E hepatitis in the United States
and the role of hepatitis G infection. N Engl J Med 1997;336:741-6.
Alter HJ, Nakatsuji Y, Melpolder J, et al. The incidence of transfusion associated
hepatitis G virus infection and its relation to liver disease. N Engl J Med 1997;336:
747-54.
Seifried C, Weber M, Bialleck H, et al. High prevalence of GBV-C/HGV among rela-
tives of GBV-C/HGV-positive blood donors in blood recipients and in patients with
aplastic anemia. Transfusion 2004;44:268-74.
80 PRACTICAL SELF-ASSESSMENT FOR TRANSFUSION MEDICINE PROFESSIONALS
Human Immunodeficiency Virus
Davenport R, Mintz PD. Transfusion medicine. In: McPhereson RA, Pincus MR, eds.
Henry’s clinical diagnosis and management by laboratory methods. 22nd ed. Phila-
delphia: WB Saunders, 2011:731-45.
Brown AE, Jackson B, Fuller SA, et al. Viral RNA in resolution of human immunode-
ficiency virus type 1 diagnostic serology. Transfusion 1997;37:926-9.
Busch MP, Glynn SA, Stramer SL, et al, for the NHLBI-REDS NAT Study Group. A
new strategy for estimating risks of transfusion-transmitted viral infections based on
rates of recently infected donors. Transfusion 2005;45:254-64.
Busch MP, Glynn SA, Wright DJ, et al, for the NHLBI-REDS NAT Study Group. Rela-
tive sensitivities of licensed nucleic acid amplification tests for detection of viremia
in early human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus infection. Transfusion
2005;45:1853-63.
Busch MP, Kleinman SH. Nucleic acid amplification testing of blood donors for
transfusion-transmitted disease. Report of the Interorganizational Task Force on
Nucleic Acid Amplification Testing of Blood Donors. Transfusion 2000;40:143-59.
Jackson JB, McDonald KL, Caldwell J, et al. Absence of HIV infection in blood
donors with indeterminate Western blot tests for antibody to HIV-1. N Engl J Med
1990;322:217-22.
LaPerche S, Morel P, Deshaseaux M, et al. HIV antibody screening remains indis-
pensable for ensuring viral safety of blood components despite NAT implementa-
tion. Transfusion 2003;43:1428-32.
Phelps R, Robbins K, Liberti T, et al. Window-period human immunodeficiency
virus transmission to two recipients by an adolescent blood donor. Transfusion
2004;44:929-33.
Sayre KR, Dodd RY, Tegtmeier G, et al. False-positive immunodeficiency virus type
1 Western blot tests in non-infected blood donors. Transfusion 1996;35:45-52.
Ward JW, Bush TJ, Perkins HA, et al. The natural history of transfusionassociated
infection with human immunodeficiency virus: Factors influencing the rate of pro-
gression to disease. N Engl J Med 1989;321:947-52.
Human T-Cell Lymphotropic Virus
Dodd RY. Epidemiology of transfusion-transmitted diseases. In: Anderson KC, Ness
PM, eds. Scientific basis of transfusion medicine. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saun-
ders, 2000:462.
Donegan E, Lee H, Operskalski E, et al. Transfusion transmission of retroviruses:
Human T-lymphotrophic viruses types I and II compared with human immunodefi-
ciency virus type 1. Transfusion 1994;34:478-83.
ADVERSE EFFECTS OF TRANSFUSION 81
Vrielink H, Zaaijer HL, Reesink HK. The clinical relevance of HTLV type I and II in
transfusion medicine. Transfus Med Rev 1997;11:173-9.
Cytomegalovirus
Bowden RA, Slichter SJ, Sayers M, et al. A comparison of filtered leukocyte-reduced
and cytomegalovirus (CMV) seronegative blood products for the prevention of trans-
fusion-associated CMV infection after marrow transplant. Blood 1995;86:3598-603.
Drew WL, Tegtmeier G, Alter HJ, et al. Frequency and duration of plasma CMV vire-
mia in seroconverting blood donors and recipients. Transfusion 2003;43:309-13.
Hillyer CD, Emmens RK, Zago-Novaretti M, Berkman EM. Methods for the reduction
of transfusion-transmitted cytomegalovirus infection: Filtration versus the use of
seronegative donor units. Transfusion 1994;34:929-34.
Laupacis A, Brown J, Costello B, et al. Prevention of posttransfusion CMV in the era
of universal WBC reduction: A consensus statement. Transfusion 2001;41:560-9.
Nichols WG, Price TH, Gooley T, et al. Transfusion-transmitted cytomegalovirus
infection after receipt of leukoreduced blood products. Blood 2003;101:4195-200.
Preiksaitis JK. Indications for the use of cytomegalovirus-seronegative blood prod-
ucts. Transfus Med Rev 1991;5:1-17.
Preiksaitis JK. Prevention of transfusion-acquired CMV infection: Is there a role for
NAT? Transfusion 2003;43:302-5.
Rahbar AR, Sundqvist V-AS, Zweygber-Wirgart B, et al. Recognition of cytomegalo-
virus clinical isolate antigens by sera from cytomegalovirus-negative blood donors.
Transfusion 2004;44:1059-66.
Roback JD, Drew WL, Laycock ME, et al. CMV DNA is rarely detected in healthy
blood donors using validated PCR assays. Transfusion 2003;43:314-21.
Smith KL, Cobain T, Dunstan RA. Removal of cytomegalovirus DNA from donor
blood by filtration. Br J Haematol 1993;83:640-2.
Vamvakas EC. Is white blood cell reduction equivalent to antibody screening in pre-
venting transmission of cytomegalovirus by transfusion? A review of the literature
and meta-analysis. Transfus Med Rev 2005;19:181-99.
van Prooijen HC, Visser JJ, van Oostendorp WR, et al. Prevention of primary transfu-
sion-associated cytomegalovirus infection in bone marrow transplant recipients by
the removal of white cells from blood components with high-affinity filters. Br J Hae-
matol 1994;87:144-7.
Zhang LJ, Hanff P, Rutherford C, et al. Detection of human cytomegalovirus DNA,
RNA, and antibody in normal donor blood. J Infect Dis 1995;171:1002-6.
82 PRACTICAL SELF-ASSESSMENT FOR TRANSFUSION MEDICINE PROFESSIONALS
West Nile Virus
Busch MP, Wright DJ, Custer B, et al. West Nile virus infections projected from blood
donor screening data, United States, 2003. Emerg Infect Dis 2006;12:395-402.
Cameron C, Reeves J, Antonishyn N, et al. West Nile virus in Canadian blood
donors. Transfusion 2005;45:487-91.
Food and Drug Administration. FDA approves first test to screen for West Nile virus
in donors of blood, organs, cells, and tissues. FDA News, December 1, 2005.
Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry: Assessing donor suitability
and blood product safety in cases of known or suspected West Nile virus infection.
(June 30, 2005) Rockville, MD: CBER Office of Community Outreach and Develop-
ment, 2005.
Rios M, Zhang MJ, Grinev A, et al. Monocytes-macrophages are a potential target in
human infection with West Nile virus through blood transfusion. Transfusion 2006;
46:659-67.
Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease
Bird S. Recipients of blood or blood products “at vCJD risk.” Br Med J 2004;328:
118-19.
Brown P. Blood infectivity, processing and screening tests in transmissible spongi-
form encephalopathy. Vox Sang 2005;89:63-70.
Brown P, Cervenekova L, Diringer H. Blood infectivity and the prospects for a diag-
nostic screening test in Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. J Lab Clin Med 2001;137:5-13.
Brown P, Rohwer RG, Dunstan BC, et al. The distribution of infectivity in blood
components and plasma derivatives in experimental models of transmissible spongi-
form encephalopathy. Transfusion 1998;38:810-16.
Drohan WN, Cervenekova L. Safety of blood products: Are transmissible spongiform
encephalopathies (prion diseases) a risk? Thromb Haemost 1999;82:486-93.
Eglin RP, Murphy WG. Beyond leukodepletion: Removing infectious prions by filtra-
tion. Transfusion 2005;45:1836-8.
Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry: Re-vised preventive mea-
sures to reduce the possible risk of transmission of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD)
and variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (vCJD) by blood and blood products. (January
9, 2002) Rockville, MD: CBER Office of Community Outreach and Development, 2002.
Llewelyn CA, Hewitt PE, Knight RSG, et al. Possible transmission of variant
Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease by blood transfusion. Lancet 2004;363:417-21.
Wilson K, Ricketts MN. The success of precaution? Managing the risk of transfusion
transmission of variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Transfusion 2004;44:1475-8.
ADVERSE EFFECTS OF TRANSFUSION 83
Wilson K, Ricketts M. A third episode of transfusion-derived vCJD. Lancet 2006;
368:2037-9.
Wroe SJ, Pal S, Siddique S, et al. Clinical presentation and pre-mortem diagnosis of
variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease associated with blood transfusion: A case report.
Lancet 2006;368:2061-7.
Yomtovian R, Peterson RB, Cohen M. ASCP check sample. Transfusion medicine
#TM 96-8 (TM-212). Chicago, IL: ASCP, 1996;39(8):107-25.
Syphilis
Chambers RW, Foley HT, Schmidt PJ. Transmission of syphilis by fresh blood com-
ponents. Transfusion 1969;9:32-4.
Chagas’ Disease
Kirchoff LV, Paredes P, Lomeli-Guerrero A, et al. Transfusion-associated Chagas’
disease (American trypanosomiasis) in Mexico: Implications for transfusion medi-
cine in the United States. Transfusion 2006;46:298-304.
Leiby DA. Parasites and other emergent infectious agents. In: Stramer S, ed. Blood
safety in the new millennium. Bethesda, MD: AABB, 2001:55-78.
Sabino EC, Goncalez TT, Salles NA, et al. Trends in the prevalence of Chagas’ dis-
ease among first-time blood donors in Sao Paolo, Brazil. Transfusion 2003;43:853-
6.
Schmunis GA. Trypanosoma cruzi, the etiologic agent of Chagas’ disease, as a con-
taminant of blood supplies: A problem of endemic and nonendemic countries.
Transfusion 1991;31:547-57.
Shulman I. Parasitic infections, an uncommon risk of blood transfusion in the United
States. Transfusion 1991;31:479-80.
Shulman IA, Appleman MD, Saxena S, et al. Specific antibodies to Trypanosoma
cruzi among blood donors in Los Angeles, California. Transfusion 1997;37:727-31.
Malaria
Mungai M, Tegtmeier G, Chamberland M, Parise M. Transfusion-transmitted malaria
in the United States from 1963 through 1999. N Engl J Med 2001;344:1973-8.
Seed CR, Kitchen A, Davis TME. The current status and potential role of laboratory
testing to prevent transfusion-transmitted malaria. Transfus Med Rev 2005;19:229-
40.
Shehata N, Kohli M, Detsky A. The cost-effectiveness of screening blood donors for
malaria by PCR. Transfusion 2004;44:217-28.
In: Leonard G, Licata M.
Practical Self-Assessment for Transfusion Medicine Professionals
Bethesda, MD: AABB Press, 2012
8

Indications for Transfusion

QUESTIONS
Question 1: Which of the following is a valid indication for RBC transfusion?
A. To increase colloid osmotic pressure.
B. To prevent anemia.
C. To improve wound healing.
D. To increase oxygen-carrying capacity in a hypoxic patient.
E. To enhance a patient’s sense of well-being.
________________________________ ________________________________
夝
Question 2: Published experimental data support which of the following state-
ments?
A. Otherwise healthy patients who are hypovolemic due to acute hemorrhage
should receive RBC transfusion.
B. Cardiac output decreases dramatically when hemoglobin levels fall below 7 g/
dL in healthy patients.
C. Most patients benefit from a more liberal RBC transfusion threshold, such as
hemoglobin ~ 10 g/dL.
D. A platelet count of 50,000/L is a more reasonable transfusion threshold than
20,000/L in afebrile, non-bleeding patients who do not have an underlying
coagulopathy.
E. A platelet count of 5000 to 10,000/L is a safe transfusion threshold for acute
leukemic patients.
________________________________ ________________________________
夝
Question 3: Which statement about the transfusion of factor concentrates or FFP is
true?
86 PRACTICAL SELF-ASSESSMENT FOR TRANSFUSION MEDICINE PROFESSIONALS
A. Prophylactic FFP transfusions for patients scheduled for invasive procedures
are generally indicated when the PT or PTT are 15 times their mid-normal val-
ues or greater.
B. If the PT and PTT are prolonged, FFP should be given the night before surgery.
C. Pooled factor concentrates have a lower risk of viral transmission compared to
FFP.
D. FFP should be used to reverse the effects of warfarin. Vitamin K should be the
second choice when FFP is not effective.
E. The initial dose of FFP should be approximately 1.0 mL/kg. PT and/or PTT
should be measured 15 minutes after infusion.
________________________________ _______________________________
夝
Question 4: Which of the following is NOT considered to be an indication for FFP?
A. Patient with petechial bleeding, but a normal PT/PTT.
B. Massive transfusion.
C. Warfarin reversal when vitamin K fails.
D. Replacement of coagulation factors during therapeutic plasma exchange.
E. Bleeding patient with a documented factor deficiency and no available factor
concentrate.
________________________________ _______________________________
夝
Question 5: Which of the following statements about Cryoprecipitated AHF is true?
A. It is ineffective in a patient who is also hypofibrinogenemic (fibrinogen <80-
100 mg/dL).
B. Each unit of Cryoprecipitated AHF contains 15 to 25 mg of fibrinogen in
approximately 10 mL of plasma.
C. Cryoprecipitate can be used to treat patients with all types of vWF disease.
D. One unit of Cryoprecipitated AHF contains twice as much fibrinogen as one
unit of FFP.
E. In a patient in whom volume overload is a likely concern, it is better to give
FFP than Cryoprecipitated AHF to replace fibrinogen levels.
________________________________ _______________________________
夝
Question 6: Which of the following outcomes is effectively accomplished by leuko-
cyte reduction of blood components?
A. Decreases the incidence of febrile nonhemolytic transfusion reactions.
B. Helps prevent transfusion-associated graft-vs-host disease.
C. Decreases the incidence of transfusion-associated acute lung injury.
INDICATIONS FOR TRANSFUSION 87
D. Eliminates the risk of CMV transmission.
E. Reverses the effects of platelet refractoriness.
________________________________ ________________________________
夝
Question 7: When is the best time to perform leukocyte reduction?
A. At the bedside, just before the transfusion.
B. At the bedside, during the transfusion.
C. In the blood bank, just before issuing the unit.
D. In the blood donor center, before storage.
E. It makes no difference when it occurs; the incidence of adverse effects will be
the same regardless.
________________________________ ________________________________
夝
Question 8: Which of the following statements about transfusion-associated graft-
vs-host disease (TA-GVHD) is true?
A. The GVHD that may occur in marrow transplant recipients is much more fatal
than TA-GVHD.
B. TA-GVHD is caused by engraftment of viable donor lymphocytes.
C. Recipients who receive non-HLA-matched blood components are at increased
risk compared to those receiving HLA-matched blood components.
D. Elderly patients are at increased risk for TA-GVHD compared to the general
population.
E. Leukocyte-reduced blood components are an acceptable substitute for irradi-
ated products.
________________________________ ________________________________
夝
ANSWERS
Question 1: Which of the following is a valid indication for RBC transfusion?
A. To increase colloid osmotic pressure.
B. To prevent anemia.
C. To improve wound healing.
D. To increase oxygen-carrying capacity in a hypoxic patient.
E. To enhance a patient’s sense of well-being.
D. The choices other than D are not scientifically validated indications for transfusion.