Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5440_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Computational Methods for Rational Drug Design
- •Contents
- •1.1.2.2 GROMACS
- •1.1.2.3 Amber
- •1.1.2.4 CHARMM
- •1.1.2.5 AutoDock
- •1.1.2.6 VMD
- •1.1.2.7 PyMOL
- •1.1.2.8 Open Babel
- •List of Contributors
- •Preface
- •1. Molecular Modeling and Drug Design
- •1.1 Introduction
- •1.1.1 What Is Molecular Modeling?
- •1.1.2 Software Used for Molecular Modeling
- •1.1.2.1 Schrodinger
- •1.1.2.9 Avogadro
- •1.1.2.10 Discovery Studio
- •1.1.3 Molecular Mechanics
- •1.1.3.1 Prediction of Binding Affinity
- •1.1.3.2 Conformational Analysis
- •1.1.3.3 Virtual Screening
- •1.1.3.4 Lead Discovery
- •1.1.3.5 Mechanism of Action
- •1.2 Types of Molecular Models
- •1.2.1 Ball-and-Spoke Model
- •1.2.1.1 Future Directions
- •1.2.2 Space-filling Models
- •1.2.2.1 Future Directions
- •1.2.3 Crystal Lattice Models
- •1.2.3.1 Future Directions
- •1.3 Computational Methods in Drug Discovery
- •1.3.1 What Is Drug Discovery?
- •1.3.2 Computational Platforms for Drug Discovery
- •1.3.2.1 NCBI
- •1.3.2.2 Chemical Databases
- •1.3.2.3 PDB
- •1.3.2.5 UniProt
- •1.3.2.6 QSAR
- •1.3.2.8 Desmond
- •1.3.2.9 OpenBabel
- •1.3.2.10 DeepChem and Cheminformatics for Python (RDKit)
- •1.3.2.11 SBML
- •1.3.2.12 Virtual Screening
- •1.3.3 Applications of Computer-Based Methods in Steps of Drug Discovery
- •1.4 Potential Use and Application of AI in Drug Designing
- •1.4.1 Target Identification and Validation
- •1.4.2 Drug Screening and Lead Optimization
- •1.4.3 De Novo Drug Design
- •1.4.4 Predictive Toxicology and ADMET
- •1.4.5 Clinical Trial Optimization
- •1.4.6 Drug Repurposing
- •1.4.7 Concept of Personalized Medicine
- •1.4.8 Drug Combination Optimization
- •1.5 Limitations of Current Methods
- •1.5.1 Data Restrictions
- •1.5.2 Interpretability
- •1.5.3 Generalization
- •1.5.4 Resources and Computation
- •1.5.5 Ethical Considerations
- •1.5.6 Validation and Experimentation
- •1.5.7 Regulatory Obstacles
- •1.6 Case Studies
- •1.7 Molecular Docking
- •1.7.1 What Is Molecular Docking?
- •1.7.1.1 Procedure
- •1.7.1.2 Biophysical Laws
- •1.7.1.3 Rigid and Flexible Docking
- •1.7.1.4 Types of Docking
- •1.7.1.5 Challenges and Future Perspectives
- •1.7.2 Applications of Molecular Docking in Drug Designing
- •1.7.3 Success of Molecular Docking Cases in Drug Designing
- •1.8 Conclusion and Future Works
- •References
- •2. Bioactive Small Molecules and Drug Discovery
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.1.1 Introduction to Drug Design and Discovery
- •2.1.2 Brief History of Small-Molecule Drug Discovery
- •2.1.3 Importance of Bioactive Small Molecules in Drug Discovery
- •2.2.1 Structure-Based Methods
- •2.2.2 Ligand-Based Methods
- •2.2.3 Network-Based Methods
- •2.3 Natural Products in Bioactive Small-Molecule Discovery
- •2.3.1 Plant Primary and Secondary Molecules as Bioactive Molecules
- •2.3.2 Anticancer Agents as Bioactive Molecules
- •2.3.3 Antiviral Agents as Bioactive Molecules
- •2.3.4 Antimalarial Agents as Bioactive Molecules
- •2.6.6 Toxicity and Side Effects
- •2.6.7 Cost-Effectiveness, Synthetic Feasibility, and Scalability
- •2.6.8 Structural Diversity and Novelty
- •2.6.9 Patentability and Intellectual Property
- •2.3.5 Marine Bioactive Products
- •2.4.1 Importance of DFT in Small-Molecule Drug Discovery
- •2.5 Application of DFT to Bioactive Small Molecules
- •2.5.1 HOMO–LUMO Calculation
- •2.5.1.1 Molecular Electrostatic Potential (MEP) Map
- •2.5.1.3 Natural Bond Orbital (NBO) Analysis
- •2.5.1.4 Implementations and Tools
- •2.6.1 Target Identification and Validation
- •2.6.2 Target Specificity
- •2.6.3 Bioavailability and Pharmacokinetics
- •2.6.4 Chemical Structure and Drug-likeness
- •2.6.5 Safety and Toxicity
- •2.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •3. Novel Drug Targets for Small Molecule-based Drug Discovery
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2 Drug Target Identification
- •3.3 Classification of Novel Drug Targets
- •3.3.1 Transcription Factors
- •3.3.2 Cytokines
- •3.3.3 Chaperones
- •3.3.4 Viral Targets
- •3.3.5 G Protein-coupled Receptors
- •3.3.6 Transporters
- •3.3.7 Enzymes
- •3.3.8 RNA Targets
- •3.4 Small Molecules as Drugs
- •3.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.2 Structure-Based Drug Discovery Concept
- •4.2.1 Structure Generation of the Target
- •4.2.1.1 The Detailed Description of Each Tool
- •4.2.2 Active Binding Site Within the Target
- •4.2.2.1 The Detailed Description of Each Tool
- •4.2.2.2 Molecular Docking Analysis
- •4.2.2.3 The Detailed Description of Each Tool
- •4.2.3 Molecular Dynamic Simulations
- •4.2.3.1 The Detailed Description of Each Tool
- •4.3 Ligand-Based Drug Discovery Concept
- •4.3.1.1 The Detailed Description of Each Tool
- •4.4 Structure- and Ligand-Based Assisted Studies
- •4.4.1 The Detailed Description of Each Tool
- •4.4.2 The Detailed Description of Each Tool
- •4.5 Advancement and Challenges in SBDD and LBDD
- •4.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •5. Virtual Screening and Lead Discovery
- •5.1 Introduction to Virtual Screening and Lead Discovery
- •5.1.1 Overview of Drug Discovery Process
- •5.1.2 Role of Virtual Screening
- •5.1.3 Importance of Lead Discovery
- •5.2 Molecular Targets and Biomolecular Structures
- •5.3 Virtual Screening Approaches
- •5.3.1 Structure-based Virtual Screening
- •5.3.2 Ligand-based Virtual Screening
- •5.3.3 Hybrid Approaches
- •5.4 Databases and Compound Collections
- •5.4.1 Overview of Chemical Databases
- •5.4.2 Compound Filtering and Preparation
- •5.4.3 Diversity and Size of Compound Collections
- •5.5 Molecular Docking
- •5.5.1 Principles of Molecular Docking
- •5.5.2 Docking Algorithms and Scoring Functions
- •5.5.3 Validation of Docking Results
- •5.6 Pharmacophore Modeling
- •5.6.1 Concept of Pharmacophores
- •5.6.2 Generating Pharmacophore Models
- •5.6.3 Applications in Lead Discovery
- •5.7 Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationship (QSAR)
- •5.7.1 Basics of QSAR
- •5.7.2 Model Development and Validation
- •5.7.3 QSAR in Virtual Screening
- •5.8 Machine Learning and AI in Virtual Screening
- •5.8.1 Introduction to Machine Learning and AI
- •5.8.2 Feature Selection and Model Training
- •5.8.3 Applications in Virtual Screening
- •5.9 Hit-to-Lead Optimization
- •5.9.1 Prioritizing Hits from Virtual Screening
- •5.9.2 SAR Analysis and Iterative Design
- •5.9.2.1 SAR Analysis (Structure–Activity Relationship)
- •5.9.2.2 Iterative Design
- •5.9.3 ADME/Tox Considerations
- •5.9.3.1 ADME (Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, Excretion)
- •5.9.3.2 Toxicity Considerations
- •5.10 Case Studies and Examples
- •5.10.1 Exploration Protocol for Mutant-targeted PI3K Inhibitors
- •5.11 Challenges and Future Directions
- •5.11.1 Limitations of Virtual Screening
- •5.11.2 Emerging Technologies and Trends
- •5.11.3 Integration with High-throughput Experimentation
- •5.12 Ethical and Regulatory Considerations
- •5.12.1 Intellectual Property and Patents
- •5.12.2 Ethical Use of Computational Tools
- •5.12.3 Regulatory Approval Process
- •5.13 Conclusion
- •5.13.1 Future Prospects in Virtual Screening and Lead Discovery
- •5.13.2 Summary of Key Points
- •References
- •6. ADMET and Physicochemical Assessments in Drug Design
- •6.1 ADMET
- •6.1.1 Absorption
- •6.1.1.1 Solubility and Dissolution
- •6.1.1.2 Lipophilicity
- •6.1.1.3 Permeability
- •6.1.2 Distribution
- •6.1.3 Metabolism
- •6.1.4 Excretion
- •6.1.5 Toxicity
- •6.2 Physicochemical Assessments
- •6.2.1 Partition Coefficient
- •6.2.2 Log D: Ionizable Compound Lipophilicity
- •6.2.2.1 Methods for Calculating Lipophilicity
- •6.2.2.2 Direct Experimental Determination of Lipophilicity
- •6.2.2.3 Indirect Experimental Determination of Lipophilicity
- •6.2.3 Acid–Base Properties and Ionization
- •6.2.4 Solubility
- •6.2.5 Polymorphism
- •6.2.6 Molecular Weight
- •6.2.7 Number of Hydrogen Bond Donors (HDB) and Acceptors (HDA)
- •References
- •7. In Silico Modeling and Drug Design
- •7.1 Introduction
- •7.2 Target Identification
- •7.2.1 Experimental Approaches
- •7.2.2 Computational Target Identification
- •7.2.3 Target Validation
- •7.3 Computer-Aided Drug Design
- •7.3.1 Ligand-based CADD
- •7.3.2 Structure-Based CADD
- •7.4 ADMET Assessment
- •7.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •8. Pharmacophore Modeling in Drug Design
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.1.1 The Role of Pharmacophore Modeling in Drug Design
- •8.1.2 Historical Perspective and Evolution of Pharmacophore Concepts
- •8.2 Essential Concepts in Pharmacophore Hypothesis Generation
- •8.2.1.1 Partitioning Initial Data into Distinctive Datasets
- •8.3 Diverse Approaches to Pharmacophore Modeling
- •8.3.1 Ligand-Based Pharmacophore Modeling
- •8.3.2 Structure-Based Pharmacophore Modeling
- •8.4 Application of Pharmacophore Modeling
- •8.4.1 Applications of Pharmacophore-Based Virtual Screening
- •8.4.1.1 Drug Discovery
- •8.4.2 Applications in Drug Target Fishing
- •8.4.3 Applications in Ligand Profiling
- •8.4.4 Applications in Docking
- •8.4.5 Applications in ADMET
- •8.4.6 Modulation of the Immune System
- •8.5 Emerging Trends in Pharmacophore Model Development
- •8.5.1 Involvement of Machine Learning
- •8.5.2 Prediction of Pharmacokinetic Properties
- •8.5.3 Structural Biology and Protein Functionality Studies
- •8.5.4 Integration with MDs Simulations
- •8.6 Case Studies
- •8.6.1 Case 1
- •8.6.2 Case 2
- •8.7 Challenges in Pharmacophore Modeling
- •8.8 Conclusion
- •Acknowledgments
- •References
- •9. Scaffold Hopping and De Novo Drug Design
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.2 Scaffold Hopping
- •9.2.1 Classification of Scaffold Hopping
- •9.2.1.1 1° Hop: Heterocycle Replacement
- •9.2.1.2 2° Hop: Ring Opening and Closure: Pseudo Ring Structures
- •9.2.1.3 3° Hop: Pseudopeptides and Peptidomimetics
- •9.2.1.4 4° Hop: Topology/Shape-Based Scaffold Hopping
- •9.2.2 Advantages of Scaffold Hopping
- •9.2.3 Disadvantages of Scaffold Hopping
- •9.2.4 Reasons for Scaffold Hopping
- •9.2.5 Properties and Key Methods of Scaffold Hopping
- •9.3 De Novo Drug Design
- •9.3.1 Classification of De Novo Drug Design
- •9.3.1.1 Structure-based Drug Design
- •9.3.1.2 Ligand-based Drug Design
- •9.3.1.3 De Novo Design Strategies
- •9.3.1.4 Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning-based Design
- •9.3.1.5 Hybrid Approaches
- •9.3.2 Basic Principle of De Novo Drug Design
- •9.3.3 Application of De Novo Drug Design
- •9.3.4 Historical Overview of Scaffold Hoping and De Novo Drug Design
- •9.3.5 Methodological Approaches in De Novo Drug Design
- •9.3.5.1 Structure-based De Novo Drug Design
- •9.3.5.2 Ligand-based De Novo Drug Design
- •9.3.5.3 Generation of Drug-Like Molecular Fragments
- •9.3.5.4 Similarity Searching
- •9.3.5.5 Selection of Target Reference Structure
- •9.3.5.6 Similarity Analysis of De Novo-generated Compounds
- •9.3.5.7 Evaluation of Scaffold Diversity
- •9.4 Results and Discussion
- •9.4.1 Generation of Drug-Like Molecular Fragments
- •9.4.2 De Novo Design with a Single Reference Structure
- •9.4.3 De Novo Design with a Focused Set of Five Similar Templates
- •9.4.4 De Novo Design with a Diverse Set of Five Templates
- •9.6 Case Study
- •9.6.1 De Novo Drug Design
- •9.6.2 Scaffold Hopping
- •9.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •10. Fragment-based Drug Design and Drug Discovery
- •10.1 Introduction
- •10.2 The Process of Finding Fragments
- •10.3 FBDD Strategies
- •10.4 Case Studies
- •10.5 Conclusion and Future Perspectives
- •References
- •11. AI/ML Approaches in Drug Design
- •11.1 Introduction
- •11.2 Traditional Drug Design Methods
- •11.2.1 The Rise of Computational Methods
- •11.2.2 The Importance of AI/ML in Modern Drug Design
- •11.3 AI/ML Landscape in Drug Design
- •11.3.1 AI/ML Algorithms and Methods
- •11.3.1.1 Machine Learning Models
- •11.3.1.2 Neural Networks
- •11.3.2 Applications in Drug Design
- •11.3.2.1 Peptide Synthesis
- •11.3.2.2 Molecular Design
- •11.3.2.3 Virtual Screening (VS)
- •11.3.2.4 Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationship Models
- •11.3.2.5 Drug Repurposing
- •11.3.3 Challenges and Failures
- •11.4 Ethics, Reliability, and Regulatory Issues
- •11.5 Future Directions
- •11.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •12. Network-based Methods in Drug Discovery
- •12.1 Introduction
- •12.1.1 Background of Drug Discovery Future Challenges
- •12.1.2 Single Target Approach Limitations
- •12.1.3 Emergence of Network Biology and Polypharmacology
- •12.2 Network Pharmacology: Practical Guide
- •12.2.1 Common Network Pharmacology Databases
- •12.2.1.1 Network Pharmacology-Related Databases and Data Analysis Tools
- •12.2.1.2 Exploring IMPPAT Network Pharmacology Databases
- •12.2.1.3 Target Genes of Phytoconstituents
- •12.2.2 Network Analysis and Visualization
- •12.2.3 Applications of Network Pharmacology in Drug Discovery
- •12.3 Ayurveda and Traditional Indian Medicine
- •12.3.1 Overview of Ayurveda and Its Complex Formulations
- •12.3.2 Diversity of Ingredients and Bioactive Compounds in Ayurvedic Medicines
- •12.4 Network Pharmacology in Herbal Remedies
- •12.4.1 Application of Network Pharmacology in Herbal Drug Discovery
- •12.4.1.1 Cancer
- •12.4.1.2 Cardiovascular Diseases (CVDs)
- •12.4.1.3 Diabetes Mellitus (DM)
- •12.4.2 Screening Pharmacological Efficacy of Herbal Remedies
- •12.4.3 Utilizing Network Pharmacology to Understand Complex Diseases
- •12.5 Conclusion and Future Prospects
- •References
- •13. Rational Design of Natural Products for Drug Discovery
- •13.1 Introduction
- •13.2 Natural Products for the Development of New Drugs
- •13.3 Criteria for Selecting Natural Products for Drug Design
- •13.4 Importance of Biodiversity in Sourcing Natural Products
- •13.5 Structural Elucidation of Natural Products
- •13.6.3 High-Throughput Screening Methods for Efficient Compound Selection
- •13.6.4 Molecular Dynamics Simulations for Predicting Solubility and Stability
- •13.6.5 ADMET Attributes Predicted In Silico
- •13.7 Formulation Challenges with Natural Products
- •13.8 Quality by Design (QbD) Approaches
- •13.8.1 Use of Computational Models for Formulation Optimization
- •13.9 Conclusion
- •References
- •14. Design of Enzyme Inhibitors in Drug Discovery
- •14.1 Introduction
- •14.3 Classification of Enzyme Inhibitors
- •14.3.1 Reversible Inhibitors
- •14.3.2 Irreversible Inhibitors
- •14.3.3 Competitive Inhibitors
- •14.3.4 Noncompetitive Inhibitors
- •14.3.5 Allosteric Modulators
- •14.4.1 Structure-Based Design
- •14.4.2 Computer-Aided Design
- •14.4.3 Fragment-Based Design
- •14.4.4 Virtual Screening Method
- •14.4.4.1 Ligand Based
- •14.4.4.2 Receptor Based
- •14.4.5 Natural Product-Based Discovery
- •14.4.6 Using Iterative Protein Crystallographic Analysis
- •14.4.7 Utilization of Covalent Inhibitors
- •14.4.8 Encapsulation Techniques
- •14.4.9 Based on Active-Site Specificity
- •14.4.10 Machine Learning Inhibitor Design
- •14.4.11 Enzyme-Templated Dynamic Combinatorial Chemistry
- •14.5 Limitations and Challenges
- •14.6 Future Directions
- •14.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •15.1 Introduction
- •15.2 Peptides as Therapeutics
- •15.2.1 Peptide Antibiotics
- •15.2.1.1 Peptides in Bone Diseases
- •15.2.1.2 Peptides in Cancer
- •15.2.1.3 Peptides in Metabolic Diseases
- •15.2.1.4 Peptides in Gastrointestinal Diseases
- •15.2.2 Advantages and Limitations of Peptide Therapeutics
- •15.2.3 FDA-Approved Peptide Therapeutics
- •15.2.4 Peptide-Based Entities in Clinical Trials
- •15.2.5 Peptide Synthesis and Diversification
- •15.2.5.1 Chemical Synthesis of Peptides
- •15.2.5.2 Chemical Modification of Peptide and Peptidomimetics
- •15.2.5.3 Backbone Modification of Peptides
- •15.2.5.4 Side-Chain Modification of Peptides
- •15.2.5.5 Peptide Cyclization
- •15.2.5.6 Peptide Mimicking of α-Helices and Stabilization
- •15.2.5.7 Peptide Mimicking of β-Strands and β-Sheets
- •15.2.5.8 Peptide Production by Recombinant Technology
- •15.2.5.9 Peptides Modification by Genetic Code Expansion
- •15.2.5.10 PEGylation of Peptides and Proteins
- •15.3 New Technologies for Peptide-Based Drug Discovery
- •15.3.1 Phage Display
- •15.3.2 mRNA Display
- •15.3.3 DNA-Encoded Libraries
- •15.3.4 Cell-Penetrating Peptides
- •15.3.5 Macrocyclic Peptides
- •15.4 Computational Approaches in Peptide Drug Discovery
- •15.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •16. Rational Design of Drugs for Neurodegenerative Disorders
- •16.1 Introduction
- •16.2 Common Mechanism of Neurodegeneration
- •16.3 Brief Overview of Computational Methods in Drug Design
- •16.4 Parkinson’s Disease as Prevalent Neurodegenerative Disorder
- •16.4.1 Epidemiology of Parkinson’s Disease
- •16.4.2 Pathogenesis of PD
- •1) Accumulation of Lewy bodies in substantia nigra
- •2) Mitochondrial dysfunction
- •3) Genetic factors
- •4) Neuroinflammation
- •5) Impaired protein handling
- •6) Oxidative stress
- •7) Environmental toxins
- •16.4.3 Signaling Pathway of Parkinson’s Disease
- •1) DA signaling
- •2) MAPK/ERK pathway
- •3) PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway
- •4) Wnt/β-catenin pathway
- •5) NF-κB (nuclear factor-κB) pathway
- •6) Autophagy-lysosomal pathway
- •7) JNK (c-Jun N-terminal kinase) pathway
- •8) AMPK (AMP-activated protein kinase) pathway
- •9) Nrf2 (nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2) pathway
- •16.4.4 Enzymatic Targets in Parkinson’s Disease
- •1) MAO-B (monoamine oxidase B)
- •2) COMT (catechol-O-methyltransferase)
- •3) LRRK2
- •4) GCase (glucocerebrosidase)
- •5) PARP-1 [poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1]
- •6) PINK1
- •7) DJ-1 (Parkinson protein 7)
- •8) Nrf2
- •16.4.5 Current Therapeutic Approaches to Treat PD
- •1) Drugs to treat motor symptoms of PD
- •2) Drugs to treat non-motor symptoms of PD
- •3) Disease-modifying therapies to treat PD
- •16.4.6 Current Therapeutic Challenges to Treat Parkinson’s disease
- •1) Symptomatic relief only
- •2) Motor fluctuations and dyskinesias
- •3) Limited efficacy in nonmotor symptoms
- •4) Disease progression
- •5) Side effects
- •6) Limited treatment options for advanced PD
- •7) Individual variability
- •16.4.7 Unmet Needs in Parkinson’s Disease Therapeutics
- •16.4.8 Significance of Computational Approaches in Parkinson’s Disease
- •16.4.9 Use of Computational Tools in Identifying Biomarkers
- •16.4.10 Neuroprotective Strategies Through Computational Insights
- •16.4.10.1 Computational Models for Neuroprotection
- •1) Target identification and validation
- •2) Drug repurposing
- •3) Alpha-synuclein aggregation inhibitors
- •4) Deep learning in biomarker discovery
- •5) Personalized medicine
- •6) Drug-induced neuroprotection
- •7) Optimizing clinical trials
- •1) ML and AI-based diagnostics
- •2) Wearable technology integration
- •3) Multimodal data fusion
- •4) Predictive modeling of disease progression
- •5) Network analysis of brain connectivity
- •6) Personalized treatment optimization
- •7) Data sharing and collaboration platforms
- •16.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •17. Rational Design of Anti-inflammatory Therapeutics
- •17.1 Introduction
- •17.2 Navigating Inflammation and its Microenvironment
- •17.2.1 Inflammatory Cell Infiltration and Vascular Permeability
- •17.2.2 Acidosis
- •17.2.3 Increased Oxidative Stress in Tissues
- •17.3 The Demand for Advanced Anti-inflammatory Medications
- •17.5 Rational Design of Anti-inflammatory Agents
- •17.5.2 New Anti-inflammatory Agent with Indoyl-imidazole Hybrids
- •17.5.3 Rational Design of Novel Aminopiperidinyl Amide
- •17.5.4 Lipid Nanoparticles (LNPs) as Anti-inflammatory Agents
- •17.6 Conclusion and Future Perspectives
- •Authors’ Contribution
- •References
- •18.1 Introduction
- •18.2 Treatment
- •18.3 Antibacterial Resistance
- •18.3.1 Mutation
- •18.3.2 Horizontal Gene Transfer (HGT)
- •18.3.3 Enzymatic Modification or Degradation
- •18.3.4 Target Site Modification
- •18.3.5 Decreased Permeability
- •18.3.6 Efflux Pumps
- •18.3.7 Plasmids
- •18.3.8 Transposons
- •18.3.9 Gene Amplification
- •18.3.10 Formation of Biofilms
- •18.3.11 Modified Metabolic Pathways
- •18.3.12 Adaptive Evolution
- •18.4.1 Structure- Based Drug Design
- •18.4.2 Modification of Existing Antibiotics
- •18.4.3 Bioisosterism
- •18.4.4 Prodrug Strategies
- •18.4.5 Similar Bacterial Components Target
- •18.4.6 Combine or Combination Therapy
- •18.4.7 Drug Repurposing
- •18.4.8 Resistant Mechanism Blocking
- •18.4.9 Improving Drug Delivery by Nanotechnology
- •18.4.10 Phage Intervention
- •18.4.11 Host Targeting
- •18.4.12 CRISPR-Cas Technique
- •18.4.13 Peptides as Antibacterials
- •18.4.14 Immunizations and Immunotherapy
- •18.4.15 Natural Product Derivatives
- •18.4.16 Fragment- Based Drug Discovery (FBDD)
- •18.4.17 Metabolomics and Genetics
- •18.4.18 Cheminformatics
- •18.5 Summary and Conclusion
- •References
- •19. Rational Design of Antiviral Therapeutics
- •19.1 Introduction to Antiviral Therapeutics
- •19.1.1 Overview
- •19.1.2 Blueprints for Antiviral Drug Interventions
- •19.1.2.1 Protein Folding and Binding Sites
- •19.1.2.2 Conformational Changes
- •19.1.2.3 Protein–Protein Interactions (PPIs)
- •19.1.2.4 Capsid and Envelope Structures
- •19.1.2.5 Structural Vulnerabilities
- •19.1.2.6 Enzymatic Activities
- •19.1.2.7 Viral Attachment
- •19.1.2.8 Viral Assembly and Replication Machinery
- •19.1.2.9 The Host’s Immune Response
- •19.2 Targets for Antiviral Therapeutics and Inhibition Strategies
- •19.2.1 Enzyme Inhibitors
- •19.2.2 Antiviral Peptides
- •19.2.3 Antiviral Antibodies
- •19.2.4 Lipid-Mimicking Compounds
- •19.2.5 Vaccines
- •19.2.6 Immunomodulation
- •19.3 Rational Strategies for Antiviral Therapeutics
- •19.3.1 CADD and QSAR (Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationship)
- •19.3.2 AI and ML
- •19.3.3 Systems Biology and Network Pharmacology
- •19.3.4 CRISPR Systems
- •19.3.5 Nanotechnology-Based Design and Delivery Systems
- •19.3.6 Reverse Vaccinology
- •19.4 Conclusion
- •References
- •20. Rational Design of Anticancer Therapeutics
- •20.1 Introduction
- •20.2 Rational Design of Nanomedicine for Cancer Treatment
- •20.4.1 Particle Size
- •20.4.2 Shape
- •20.4.3 Surface Modification
- •20.6 Artificial Intelligence’s Progress in Anticancer Drug Development
- •20.6.1 Identification of Anticancer Drug Targets Using Artificial Intelligence
- •20.6.3 Artificial Intelligence-Based De Novo Anticancer Drug Design
- •20.6.4 Artificial Intelligence for Repurposing Anticancer Drugs
- •20.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •21. PROTAC and ProTide Strategies in Drug Design
- •21.1 Introduction
- •21.2 Drug Design: Past to Present
- •21.3 PROTAC Strategy in Drug Design
- •21.3.1 Ubiquitin Proteasome System and PROTACs
- •21.3.2 Chemical Formulations of PROTACs
- •21.3.3 Advent of PROTACs as Antiviral
- •21.3.4 NS3/4A-Targeting PROTACs Against HCV
- •21.3.4.1 Neuraminidase-Targeting PROTACs
- •21.4 Emergence of ProTide Technology in Drug Design
- •21.5 Approaches of ProTides in Drug Development
- •21.6 Implementation of ProTides as Nucleoside Analogs
- •21.6.1 Antiviral Applications of ProTides
- •21.7 Conclusion
- •References

393
defense against pathogens. However, extreme production of ROS can lead to oxidative damage
of lipids, proteins, and DNA. As a result of this, apoptosis or necrosis may eventually cause
cell death [34].
Oxidative stress, which is caused by ROS, has been directly associated with a number of diseases,
including diabetes, asthma, acute ischemic stroke, acute lung or liver injury, acute gastroenteritis,
acute bronchitis, neurodegenerative diseases, IBD, cardiovascular diseases, and RA. When com-
pared to healthy entities that have Helicobacter pylori or IBD, the ROS levels are more than 10–100
times greater [35]. Extracellular H
2
O
2
concentration rose to 100 μM during reperfusion and
ischemia in several neurological disorders. This eventually resulted in the development of
Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases due to changes in structural elements and neuronal proteins
as well as loss of cognitive function [36]. Respiratory lining cells with inflammatory lung diseases
had 20 times greater H
2
O
2
levels than in healthy tissues [37]. Research carried out on animal mod-
els of colitis, acute lung damage, and alcoholic liver injury demonstrated that the amount of ROS
often follows a parabolic trajectory as different IDs proceed. The kind of illness and whether the
inflammatory stimuli are endogenous or external dictate when the maximal level occurs [38, 39].
Therefore, endogenous biochemical stimuli are treated by oxidative stress at the site of
inflammation.
17.3 The Demand for Advanced Anti-inflammatory Medications
A major healthcare problem worldwide is IDs, which include different types of rheumatic diseases
in which inflammation disorder badly affects human health. There are various agents available to
treat the disorder but they have adverse side effects on human health, in traditional practice there
are two types of drugs either steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or NSAIDs are available to manage
the ID. Through the cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibition in the prostaglandins biosynthesis, NSAIDs
can inhibit in the early steps, and these are the main drugs for the reduction of inflammation con-
sequences [40]. The use of NSAIDs has many side effects which are related to renal, gastrointesti-
nal, and toxicities [41]. The use of corticosteroids is central to hypertension, hyperglycemia,
osteoporosis, and growth arrest [42]. The significant challenge associated with presently utilized
synthetic drugs is their potential for toxicity and the recurrence of symptoms upon discontinua-
tion [40]. There is a growing interest in addressing this issue by exploring the advances of safer
anti-inflammatory agents [43]. A rational and productive strategy toward the treatment of inflam-
matory conditions involves the progress of anti-inflammatory drugs consequent from normal
sources [44]. For the treatment of IDs natural products are the biocompatible, safe, and cost-
effective alternatives, efficacious.
Since ancient times, there have been many countries, such as India, Sri Lanka, China, and Brazil
called hubs of natural products used as traditional medicine. Recently, research has been delving
into the pharmacologic and molecular mechanisms that underlie the health benefits and thera-
peutic potential of many compounds. The integration of traditional knowledge and indigenous
resources is deemed essential for advancing the development of new anti-inflammatory leads [41].
Numerous reports focus on traditional plants employed in folk medicine for their anti-inflammatory
properties, providing valuable insights that contribute to the potential use of natural products as
anti-inflammatory drugs [45]. The impact of phytoconstituents is manifested through their influ-
ence on pivotal regulatory molecules such as cytokines, inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS),
and COX [46, 47].

394
17.4 Natural Products Used for Anti-inflammatory Drug
Development: Systematic Approach in Use of Different Animal
Models for Evaluations
Pharmacology plays an essential role in modern medicine in the search for new drugs with the
use of appropriate models and identifying the mechanism of the selected molecules. For the
prediction of clinically and physiologically suitable models the trial models are used, based on
pharmacological ethics, the model is selected based on their results which should be matched
with the clinical results, for the preclinical assessment of drugs Vogel et al. [48] designated vari-
ous methods, i.e., in vivo and in vitro. For the screening of anti-inflammatory agents, many mod-
els are used they have used different mechanisms for the screening of activity, some examples
are enlisted in Table 17.1.
Before beginning any experimental technique, a number of preparatory criteria such as
medication dosage, sample size, toxicity, and others should be taken into account [60]. There are
several research on the anti-inflammatory properties of phytoconstituents that demonstrate their
safety, toxicity, and mode of action. During the drug discovery process, improper work planning
leads to the rejection of phytoconstituents; thus, program selection must be done carefully. The
main cause of the failure of phytoconstituents-based drug development programs appears to be
program selection.
17.5 Rational Design of Anti-inflammatory Agents
17.5.1 Creating Anti-inflammatory Polymers Through Phosphoramidite Chemistry
Inspired by Apoptotic Processes
The polymers are designed with immunosuppressive effects for anti-inflammatory therapies,
which results in the modification of the morphology of immune cells. The researcher used the
phosphoramidite method in which phosphoramidite chemistry was utilized to synthesize
the apoptotic cell-membrane-inspired polymers. The macrophages employed in the in vitro cell
viability assays of PS-modified polymers demonstrated their nontoxicity at concentrations of
1 × 10
5
μg/mL. The expression of NF–κB has been decreased, which showed that the macrophages
are protected from lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation [72].
17.5.2 New Anti-inflammatory Agent with Indoyl-imidazole Hybrids
For designing new agents researchers used in vivo analgesic and anti-inflammatory activity as well
as ulcerogenicity of the prepared hybrids were evaluated in experimental animals. COX-2 enzyme
was employed in the computational studies, which produced two new hybrid compounds with the
lowest binding energy [73].
17.5.3 Rational Design of Novel Aminopiperidinyl Amide
In this study, the C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 has been used as a targeted enzyme for ID. In
this study, the ZINC chemical database has been screened, and after molecular dynamic simula-
tion, the Z7R was identified as a novel compound with nanomolar affinity and 78.5% chemotaxis
inhibition which shows potent anti-inflammatory activity [74].

Table 17.1 Methods for evaluating anti-inflammatory activity in animal models.
S. no. Inflammation Model Mechanism Advantage Disadvantage References
1. Acute-
inflammation
Carrageenan-
induced paw
edema
Initiate the inflammation phase from the
beginning; cyclooxygenase pathway activation
dilates post-capillary venules
Inflammation is reproducible,
acute and nonimmune
Susceptible to inhibitors of
cyclooxygenase
Adequate for NSAIDs evaluation
The researcher was
instructed in recording
the consistent and
dependable paw
volume
[49, 50]
Histamine/5-
HT-induced
paw edema
It causes an increase in lymph flow, which
causes edema to occur
Histamine injected subplantarly stimulates
the release of fluid and plasma proteins from
the cell
Used as a secondary model
5-HT inhibitor drugs assessed
Prostaglandin inhibitor
drugs cannot be
checked
[51, 52]
Paw edema
induced by
bradykinin
Bradykinin-stimulated human endothelial cell
cultures produce metabolites of arachidonic
acid
Drugs suppressing
prostaglandins are successful in
this model
It only causes
moderate, temporary
edema
[53]
Paw edema
induced by
dextran
Increased permeability of blood vessels,
activation of kinin, and release of mediators,
including histamine and serotonin, which
produce osmotic edema with insufficient
neutrophils and proteins
This can be used to bolster the
results of the paw model caused
by carrageenan
Unsuitable for drugs
acting through
mechanisms other
than antiserotonin or
antihistamine
[53–55]
LPS-induced
paw edema
TNF-α-mediated inflammation drugs assisted The simultaneous assessment of
anti-inflammatory and analgesic
can be done
NA [54, 56]
Arachidonic
acid-induced
ear edema
Fast transformation into lipoxygenase and
cyclooxygenase products
Anti-inflammatory for eicosanoid
inhibition recognized
Animals are sacrificed [57]
Croton oil/
TPA-induced
ear edema
Topical administration of croton oil causes
stimulates neutrophil influx, vascular
permeability, synthesis of eicosanoids,
vasodilatation, and liberation of serotonin and
histamine
Most suitable for steroidal and
NSAID
Animals are sacrificed [58, 59, 60, 61]
(Continued )

Table 17.1 (Continued)
S. no. Inflammation Model Mechanism Advantage Disadvantage References
Oxazolone-
induced ear
edema
Oxazolone dramatically raises the levels of
IFN-γ while having a negligible effect on
IL-4 levels
Interferon-γ can cause the activation of various
inflammatory cell
Recognize the model of
delayed-type hypersensitivity
Animals are sacrificed [62, 63]
Acetic acid/
Compound
48/80-induced
vascular
permeability
Compound 48/80 is an activator of histamine
release and mast cell degranulation
Appropriate model for evaluating
the acute-inflammatory effect
Severe irritation [64]
Pleurisy model Exudes, the overall protein composition and
the inhibition of leukocyte migration
demonstrate the acute anti-inflammatory effect
This test enables the evaluation
of the inflammatory
phenomenon
Severe pain, animal
sacrifices
[65, 66]
2. Sub-acute
inflammation
Granuloma
pouch model
Carcinogenic and mutagenic tissues grown
Maintain direct contact of a target with the
compounds
Test substances into air pouches Animal sacrifices [67, 68]
3. Chronic
inflammation
Cotton
pellet-induced
granuloma
The transudatory and proliferative elements
evaluated
Give information about
proliferative changes
It needs surgical skills
May cause localized
sepsis
[64, 69]
Formalin-
induced paw
edema
Bradykinin and substance-p mediate the early
neurogenic phase, while histamine, 5-HT,
prostaglandins, and Bradykinin are implicated
in the later inflammatory phase
It resembles human arthritis Irritating and painful
for animals
[64]
Arthritis
induced by
CFA
Leukocyte infiltration, cytokine, and
chemokine levels elevated with TNF-α and
IL-1β destruction of bone and cartilage
accompanied by edema and deformity and the
release of ROS
The best model for arthritis
alteration
It may affect the
severity of arthritis,
and it needs attention
[70, 71]
TNF, tumor necrosis factor; IL, interleukin; IFN, interferon; NSAID, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; 5-HT, hydroxytryptamine; CFA, complete Freund’s adjuvant.

References 397
17.5.4 Lipid Nanoparticles (LNPs) as Anti-inflammatory Agents
LNPs are the most used as a delivery agent for RNA therapeutics and have the ability to trigger an
innate immune response and cause inflammation. It has been found that Dexamethasone (Dex) is
used as an anti-inflammatory medication which is directly related to cholesterol, which is the main
component of LNPs. In a study, it was found that the expression of TNF-ɑ has been reduced in
in vivo and in vitro experiments after the treatment of Dex-incorporated LNPs [75].
17.6 Conclusion and Future Perspectives
In conclusion, IDs place a significant burden on global health, affecting various organs and sys-
tems within the body. The complex interaction between immune cells and molecular mediators
defines the inflammatory environment, resulting in either acute or chronic responses. The altered
small blood vessels, acidosis, and increased oxidative stress contribute to the complexity of these
conditions. There are drawbacks and possible adverse effects to the available treatments, which
include glucocorticoids and NSAIDs. Although monoclonal antibodies that target proinflamma-
tory cytokines are promising, there are drawbacks as well, including expense, the possibility of
serious infections and cancers, and primary or secondary unresponsiveness. The demand for
advanced anti-inflammatory medications has led to the exploration of natural products as poten-
tial alternatives. Traditional knowledge and resources from indigenous populations play a crucial
role in identifying new leads for the treatment of inflammatory conditions. However, the challenge
lies in overcoming the toxicity and recurrence of symptoms associated with current synthetic
drugs. To achieve effective anti-inflammatory results, it is essential to follow a systematic approach
that incorporates the use of various animal models for evaluation. The rational design of new com-
pounds, including polymers inspired by apoptotic cell death, indoyl-imidazole hybrids, aminopi-
peridinyl amide, and LNPs, offers promising avenues for therapy development. In general, the
development of anti-inflammatory treatments mandates a multidisciplinary approach that incor-
porates insights from pharmacology, natural products, and innovative methods of drug delivery,
also the future of anti-inflammatory drug development lies in a multidisciplinary approach that
leverages technological advancements, novel therapeutic strategies, and a deep understanding of
the complex biology of inflammation. By addressing current limitations and exploring new fron-
tiers, we can develop safer, more effective treatments that significantly improve the quality of life
for individuals affected by IDs. The objective is to overcome the limitations of current treatments
and provide individuals struggling with IDs with safer and more effective options.
Authors’ Contribution
Conceptualization: K.S. and A.G.; writing: original draft preparation, K.S., A.G., I.S., A.S., and U.S.;
manuscript review and editing: K.S., A.G., I.S., A.S., and U.S.; Supervision: K.S. and A.G.; All the
authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
References
1 Dewanjee, S., Dua, T.K., and Sahu, R. (2013). Potential anti-inflammatory effect of Leea macrophylla
Roxb. leaves: a wild edible plant. Food and Chemical Toxicology 59: 514–520.
2 Kulkarni, R., Achaiah, G., and Narahari, S.G. (2006). Novel targets for antiinflammatory and
antiarthritic agents. Current Pharmaceutical Design 12 (19): 2437–2454.

398
3 Calixto, J.B., Otuki, M.F., and Santos, A.R.S. (2003). Anti-inflammatory compounds of plant origin.
Part I. Action on arachidonic acid pathway, nitric oxide and nuclear factor kB (NF-kB). Planta
Medica 69 (11): 973–983.
4 Ahamad, N., Kar, A., Mehta, S. et al. (2021). Immunomodulatory nanosystems for treating IDs.
Biomaterials 274: 120875.
5 Park, H., Bourla, A.B., Kastner, D.L. et al. (2012). Lighting the fires within: the cell biology of
autoIDs. Nature Reviews Immunology 12 (8): 570–580. Available from: https://www.nature.com/
articles/nri3261.
6 Kassebaum, N.J., Arora, M., Barber, R.M. et al. (2016). Global, regional, and national disability
adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 315 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE),
1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2015. The Lancet
388 (10053): 1603–1658.
7 Dou, Y., Li, C., Li, L. et al. (2020). Bioresponsive drug delivery systems for the treatment of IDs.
Journal of Controlled Release 327: 641–666.
8 Taylor, P.C. and Feldmann, M. (2009). Anti-TNF biologic agents: still the therapy of choice for
rheumatoid arthritis. Nature Reviews Rheumatology 5 (10): 578–582. Available from: https://www.
nature.com/articles/nrrheum.2009.181.
9 Tephan, T., Argan, S.R., Tephen, H. et al. (1997). A short-term study of chimeric monoclonal
antibody cA2 to tumor necrosis factor α for Crohn’s disease. The New England Journal of Medicine
[Internet] 337 (15): 1029–1036. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199710093371502.
10 Kojima, Y., Volkmer, J.P., McKenna, K. et al. (2016). CD47-blocking antibodies restore phagocytosis
and prevent atherosclerosis. Nature 536 (7614): 86–90. Available from: https://www.nature.com/
articles/nature18935.
11 Leckie, M.J., Ten Brinke, A., Khan, J. etal. (2000). Effects of an interleukin-5 blocking monoclonal
antibody on eosinophils, airway hyper-responsìveness, and the late asthmatic response. The Lancet
356 (9248): 2144–2148.
12 Khilfeh, I., Guyette, E., Watkins, J. et al. (2019). Adherence, persistence, and expenditures for high-
cost anti-inflammatory drugs in rheumatoid arthritis: an exploratory study. Journal of Managed
Care & Specialty Pharmacy 25 (4): 461–467. https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp. 2019.25.4.461.
13 Rock, K.L. and Kono, H. (2008). The inflammatory response to cell death. Annual Review of
Pathology: Mechanisms of Disease 3: 99–126. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pathmechdis.
3.121806.151456.
14 Zhang, J.M. and An, J. (2007). Cytokines, inflammation, and pain. International Anesthesiology
Clinics 45 (2): 27–37. Available from: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title= Cytokines
%2C%20inflammation%2C%20and%20pain&author=J.-M.%20Zhang&publication_
year=2007&pages=27-37.
15 da Silva, S.B., Ferreira, D., Pintado, M., and Sarmento, B. (2016). Chitosan-based nanoparticles for
rosmarinic acid ocular delivery– invitro tests. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 84:
112–120.
16 Shields, C.W., Wang, L.L., Evans, M.A., and Mitragotri, S. (2020). Materials for immunotherapy.
Advanced Materials 32: 13, 1901633.
17 Ahamad, N., Prabhakar, A., Mehta, S. et al. (2020). Trigger-responsive engineered-nanocarriers and
image-guided theranostics for rheumatoid arthritis. Nanoscale 12 (24): 12673–12697.
18 Yi, B.G., Park, O.K., Jeong, M.S. et al. (2017). In vitro photodynamic effects of scavenger receptor
targeted-photoactivatable nanoagents on activated macrophages. International Journal of
Biological Macromolecules 97: 181–189.

References 399
19 Yang, H., Sun, Y., Wei, J. et al. (2019). The effects of ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction
(UTMD) carrying IL-8 monoclonal antibody on the inflammatory responses and stability of
atherosclerotic plaques. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 118: 109161.
20 Schett, G., Elewaut, D., McInnes, I.B. et al. (2013). How cytokine networks fuel inflammation:
toward a cytokine-based disease taxonomy. Nature Medicine 19 (7): 822–824.
21 Schwartz, D.M., Kanno, Y., Villarino, A. etal. (2017). JAK inhibition as a therapeutic strategy for
immune and IDs. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 16 (12): 843–862. Available from: https://www.
nature.com/articles/nrd.2017.201.
22 Corbo, C., Cromer, W.E., Molinaro, R. et al. (2017). Engineered biomimetic nanovesicles show
intrinsic anti-inflammatory properties for the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases.
Nanoscale 9 (38): 14581–14591.
23 Ziraldo, C., Vodovotz, Y., Namas, R.A. et al. (2013). Central role for MCP-1/CCL2 in injury-induced
inflammation revealed by in vitro, in silico, and clinical studies. PLoS One 8 (12): e79804.
24 Leuschner, F., Dutta, P., Gorbatov, R. et al. (2011). Therapeutic siRNA silencing in inflammatory
monocytes in mice. Nature Biotechnology 29 (11): 1005–1010. Available from: https://www.nature.
com/articles/nbt.1989.
25 Ponzoni, M., Pastorino, F., Di Paolo, D. et al. (2018). Targeting macrophages as a potential
therapeutic intervention: impact on IDs and cancer. International Journal of Molecular Sciences
19 (7): 1953.
26 Fromen, C.A., Kelley, W.J., Fish, M.B. et al. (2017). Neutrophil-particle interactions in blood
circulation drive particle clearance and alter neutrophil responses in acute inflammation. ACS
Nano [Internet] 11 (11): 10797–10807. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.7b03190.
27 Liu, Y.C., Zou, X.B., Chai, Y.F., and Yao, Y.M. (2014). Macrophage polarization in IDs.
International Journal of Biological Sciences 10 (5): 520–529.
28 Leuschner, F., Dutta, P., Gorbatov, R. et al. (2011). Therapeutic siRNA silencing in inflammatory
monocytes in mice. Nature Biotechnology 29 (11): 1005–1010. Available from: https://www.nature.
com/articles/nbt.1989.
29 Murray, P.J. and Wynn, T.A. (2011). Protective and pathogenic functions of macrophage subsets.
Nature Reviews Immunology 11 (11): 723–737. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/
nri3073.
30 Saito, E., Kuo, R., Pearson, R.M. etal. (2019). Designing drug-free biodegradable nanoparticles to
modulate inflammatory monocytes and neutrophils for ameliorating inflammation. Journal of
Controlled Release 300: 185–196.
31 Kwon, D., Cha, B.G., Cho, Y. etal. (2017). Extra-large pore mesoporous silica nanoparticles for
directing invivo M2macrophage polarization by delivering IL-4. Nano Letters [Internet] 17 (5): 2747–
2756. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b04130.
32 Brown, B.N., Ratner, B.D., Goodman, S.B. et al. (2012). Macrophage polarization: an opportunity
for improved outcomes in biomaterials and regenerative medicine. Biomaterials 33 (15):
3792–3802.
33 Taratummarat, S., Sangphech, N., Vu, C.T.B. et al. (2018). Gold nanoparticles attenuates bacterial
sepsis in cecal ligation and puncture mouse model through the induction of M2 macrophage
polarization. BMC Microbiology [Internet] 18 (1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-018-1227-3.
34 Thomas, T.P., Goonewardena, S.N., Majoros, I.J. et al. (2011). Folate-targeted nanoparticles show
efficacy in the treatment of inflammatory arthritis. Arthritis & Rheumatology [Internet] 63 (9):
2671–2680. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.30459.
35 van der Veeken, J., Gonzalez, A.J., Cho, H. et al. (2016). Memory of inflammation in regulatory T
cells. Cell 166 (4): 977–990.

400
36 Chen, Z., Vong, C.T., Gao, C. et al. (2020). Bilirubin nanomedicines for the treatment of reactive
oxygen species (ROS)-mediated diseases. Molecular Pharmaceutics [Internet] 17 (7): 2260–2274.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.0c00337.
37 Zeng, F., Wu, Y., Li, X. et al. (2018). Custom-made ceria nanoparticles show a neuroprotective
effect by modulating phenotypic polarization of the microglia. Angewandte Chemie 130 (20):
5910–5914.
38 Gou, S., Huang, Y., Wan, Y. et al. (2019). Multi-bioresponsive silk fibroin-based nanoparticles with
on-demand cytoplasmic drug release capacity for CD44-targeted alleviation of ulcerative colitis.
Biomaterials 212: 39–54.
39 Jung, E., Lee, J., Jeong, L. et al. (2019). Stimulus-activatable echogenic maltodextrin nanoparticles
as nanotheranostic agents for peripheral arterial disease. Biomaterials 192: 282–291.
40 Jo, W.S., Yang, K.M., Choi, Y.J. et al. (2010). In vitro and in vivo anti-inflammatory effects of
pegmatite. Molecular & Cellular Toxicology [Internet] 6 (2): 195–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s13273-010-0027-0.
41 Dewanjee, S., Dua, T.K., and Sahu, R. (2013). Potential anti-inflammatory effect of Leea
macrophylla Roxb. leaves: a wild edible plant. Food and Chemical Toxicology 59: 514–520.
42 Gautam, R. and Jachak, S.M. (2009). Recent developments in anti-inflammatory natural products.
Medicinal Research Reviews 29 (5): 767–820.
43 Gorzalczany, S., López, P., Acevedo, C., and Ferraro, G. (2011). Anti-inflammatory effect of
Lithreamolleoides extracts and isolated active compounds. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 133 (3):
994–998.
44 Sofidiya, M.O., Imeh, E., Ezeani, C. et al. (2014). Antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory activities
of ethanolic extract of Alafia barteri. Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia 24 (3): 348–354.
45 Patil, K.R., Mahajan, U.B., Unger, B.S. et al. (2019). Animal models of inflammation for screening
of anti-inflammatory drugs: implications for the discovery and development of
phytopharmaceuticals. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20 (18): 4367.
46 de Oliveira RG, Mahon CPAN, Ascêncio PGM, Ascêncio SD, Balogun SO, Martins DT de O.
Evaluation of anti-inflammatory activity of hydroethanolic extract of Dilo dendron bipinnatum
Radlk. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 2014;155(1): 387–95.
47 Bellik, Y., Boukraâ, L., Alzahrani, H.A. et al. (2013). Molecular mechanism underlying anti-
inflammatory and anti-allergic activities of phytochemicals: an update. Molecules 18 (1): 322–353.
Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/18/1/322/htm.
48 Han, J., Kim, Y.S., Lim, M.Y. et al. (2018). Dual roles of graphene oxide to attenuate inflammation
and elicit timely polarization of macrophage phenotypes for cardiac repair. ACS Nano 12 (2):
1959–1977.
49 Boominathan, R., Parimaladevi, B., Mandal, S.C., and Ghoshal, S.K. (2004). Anti-inflammatory
evaluation of Ionidium suffruticosam Ging. in rats. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 91 (2–3):
367–370.
50 Sarkhel, S. (2016). Evaluation of the anti-inflammatory activities of Quillaja saponaria Mol.
saponin extract in mice. Toxicology Reports 3: 1–3.
51 Singh, B., Bani, S., Gupta, D.K. et al. (2003). Anti-inflammatory activity of ‘TAF’ an active fraction
from the plant Barleria prionitis Linn. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 85 (2–3): 187–193.
52 Vasudevan, M., Gunnam, K.K., and Parle, M. (2007). Antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory
effects of Thespesia populnea bark extract. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 109 (2): 264–270.
53 De Araújo Vilar, M.S., De Souza, G.L., De Araújo, V.D. et al. (2016). Assessment of phenolic
compounds and anti-inflammatory activity of ethyl acetate phase of Anacardium occidentale
L. Bark. Molecules 21 (8): 1087. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/21/8/1087/htm.

References 401
54 Coura, C.O., Souza, R.B., Rodrigues, J.A.G. et al. (2015). Mechanisms involved in the anti
inflammatory action of a polysulfated fraction from Gracilaria cornea in rats. PLoS One [Internet]
10 (3): e0119319. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119319.
55 Babu, N.P., Pandikumar, P., and Ignacimuthu, S. (2009). Anti-inflammatory activity of Albizia
lebbeck Benth., an ethnomedicinal plant, in acute and chronic animal models of inflammation.
Journal of Ethnopharmacology 125 (2): 356–360.
56 Calil, I.L., Zarpelon, A.C., Guerrero, A.T.G. et al. (2014). Lipopolysaccharide induces inflammatory
hyperalgesia triggering a TLR4/MyD88-dependent cytokine cascade in the mice paw. PLoS One
[Internet] 9 (3): e90013. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090013.
57 Boller, S., Soldi, C., Marques, M.C.A. et al. (2010). Anti-inflammatory effect of crude extract and
isolated compounds from Baccharis illinita DC in acute skin inflammation. Journal of
Ethnopharmacology 130 (2): 262–266.
58 Sadeghi, H., Parishani, M., AkbartabarTouri, M. et al. (2017). Pramipexole reduces inflammation
in the experimental animal models of inflammation. Immunopharmacology and Immunotoxicology
[Internet] 39 (2): 80–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923973.2017.1284230.
59 Vignali, D.A.A., Collison, L.W., and Workman, C.J. (2008). How regulatory T cells work. Nature
Reviews Immunology 8 (7): 523–532. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/nri2343.
60 Taratummarat, S., Sangphech, N., Vu, C.T.B. et al. (2018). Gold nanoparticles attenuates bacterial
sepsis in cecal ligation and puncture mouse model through the induction of M2 macrophage
polarization. BMC Microbiology 18 (1): 85.
61 Nonato, F.R., Nogueira, T.M.O., De Almeida Barros, T.A. et al. (2011). Antinociceptive and
antiinflammatory activities of Adiantum latifolium lam.: evidence for a role of IL-1β inhibition.
Journal of Ethnopharmacology 136 (3): 518–524.
62 Bralley, E.E., Greenspan, P., Hargrove, J.L. et al. (2008). Topical anti-inflammatory activity of
Polygonum cuspidatum extract in the TPA model of mouse ear inflammation. Journal of
Inflammation [Internet] 5 (1): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-9255-5-1.
63 Bas, E., Recio, M.C., Máñez, S. et al. (2007). New insight into the inhibition of the inflammatory
response to experimental delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions in mice by scropolioside
A. European Journal of Pharmacology 555 (2–3): 199–210.
64 Segawa, S., Takata, Y., Kaneda, H., and Watari, J. (2007). Effects of a hop water extract on the
compound 48/80-stimulated vascular permeability in ICR mice and histamine release from OVA-
sensitized BALB/c mice. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry [Internet] 71 (6): 1577–1581.
https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb.70047.
65 Wu, Y., Zhou, C., Song, L. et al. (2006). Effect of total phenolics from Laggera alata on acute and
chronic inflammation models. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 108 (2): 243–250.
66 Rachmawati, H., Safitri, D., Pradana, A., and Adnyana, I. (2016). TPGS-stabilized curcumin
nanoparticles exhibit superior effect on carrageenan-induced inflammation in Wistar rat.
Pharmaceutics 8 (3): 24.
67 Gupta, M., Mazumder, U.K., Sambath Kumar, R. et al. (2005). Anti-inflammatory, analgesic and
antipyretic effects of methanol extract from Bauhinia racemosa stem bark in animal models.
Journal of Ethnopharmacology 98 (3): 267–273.
68 Neto, A.G., Costa, J.M.L.C., Belati, C.C. et al. (2005). Analgesic and anti-inflammatory activity of a
crude root extract of Pfaffia glomerata (Spreng) Pedersen. Journal of Ethnopharmacology
96 (1–2): 87–91.
69 Lalrinzuali, K., Vabeiryureilai, M., and Jagetia, G.C. (2016). Investigation of the anti-inflammatory
and analgesic activities of ethanol extract of stem bark of Sonapatha Oroxylum indicum in vivo.
International Journal of Inflammation 2016 (1): 8247014.

402
70 Cascão, R., Vidal, B., Raquel, H. et al. (2014). Potent anti-inflammatory and antiproliferative
effects of gambogic acid in a rat model of antigen-induced arthritis. Mediators of Inflammation
2014 (1): 195327.
71 Mbiantcha, M., Almas, J., Shabana, S.U. et al. (2017). Anti-arthritic property of crude extracts of
Piptadeniastrum africanum (Mimosaceae) in complete Freund’s adjuvant-induced arthritis in rats.
BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine [Internet] 17 (1): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/
s12906-017-1623-5.
72 Nakagawa, Y., Saitou, A., Aoyagi, T., and Ebara, M. (2018). Rational design of anti-inflammatory
polymers inspired by apoptotic cell death using phosphoramidite chemistry. Polymer (Guildf)
134: 85–93.
73 Husain, A., AlAsmari, A.F., Azmi, S.N.H. et al. (2022). Rational drug design, synthesis, and in vivo
biological activity of new indolyl-imidazolone hybrids as potential and safer non-steroidal
anti-inflammatory agents. Journal of King Saud University, Science 34 (4): 102023.
74 Oum, Y.H., Kell, S.A., Yoon, Y. et al. (2020). Discovery of novel aminopiperidinyl amide
CXCR4 modulators through virtual screening and rational drug design. European Journal of
Medicinal Chemistry 201: 112479.
75 Zhang, H., Han, X., Alameh, M.G. et al. (2022). Rational design of anti-inflammatory lipid
nanoparticles for mRNA delivery. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. Part A 110 (5):
1101–1108.
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
