Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5253_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
11 Мб
Скачать
☆
Klosinski G. Eye movement control during single-word reading in dyslexics. J Vis. 2004;4(5):388-402.
13. Evans BJW. Dyslexia and Vision. Chichester: Wiley; 2001.
14. Nilsson Benfatto M, Oqvist Seimyr G, Ygge J, Pansell T, Rydberg A, Jacobson C. Screening for Dyslexia Using Eye Tracking during Reading. PLoS One. 2016;11(12):e0165508. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165508.
15. Macambira Y, Barbosa J, Queiroga BM, Cordeiro AAA, Menezes DC, Lima M, et al. Ocular findings from otoneurological examinations in children with and without dyslexia: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2022;88 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S192-S201. doi:
10.1016/j.bjorl.2021.10.006.
16. Munoz DP, Armstrong IT, Hampton KA, Moore KD. Altered control of visual fixation and saccadic eye movements in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Neurophysiol. 2003;90(1):503-14.
17. Bellocchi S, Muneaux M, Bastien-Toniazzo M, Ducrot S. I can read it in your eyes: what eye movements tell us about visuo-attentional processes in developmental dyslexia. Res Dev Disabil. 2013;34(1):452-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2012.09.002.
18. Biscaldi M, Fischer B, Hartnegg K. Voluntary saccadic control in dyslexia. Perception. 2000;29(5):509-21.
19. Ward LM, Kapoula Z. Differential diagnosis of vergence and saccade disorders in dyslexia. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):22116. doi: 10.1038/s41598­020-79089-1.
20. Razuk M, Barela JA, Peyre H, Gerard CL, Bucci MP. Eye movements and postural control in dyslexic children performing different visual tasks. PLoS One. 2018;13(5):e0198001. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198001.
21. De Luca M, Di Pace E, Judica A, Spinell D, Zoccolotti P. Eye movement patterns in linguistic and non-linguistic tasks in developmental surface dyslexia. Neuropsychologia. 1999;37(12):1407-20.
22. Vinuela-Navarro V, Erichsen JT, Williams C, Woodhouse JM. Saccades and fixations in children with delayed reading skills. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 2017;37(4):531-41. doi: 10.1111/opo.12392.
23. Vikesdal GH, Falkenberg HK, Mon-Williams M, Riddell P, Langaas T. Normal saccades but decreased fixation stability in a population of children with dyslexia. Scandinavian Journal of Optometry and Visual Science. 2021;14(2):1-7. doi: 10.5384/sjovs.v14i2.137.
24. Prado C, Dubois M, Valdois S. The eye movements of dyslexic children during reading and visual search: impact of the visual attention span. Vision Res. 2007;47(19):2521-30.
25. Hutzler F, Kronbichler M, Jacobs AM, Wimmer H. Perhaps correlational but not causal: no effect of dyslexic readers' magnocellular system on their eye movements during reading. Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(4):637-
48.
26. Franzen L, Stark Z, Johnson AP. Individuals with dyslexia use a different visual sampling strategy to read text. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):6449. doi:
12. Mackeben M, Trauzettel-Klosinski S, Reinhard J, Durrwachter U, Adler M,
Vision, Reading Difficulties and Visual Stress
98
10.1038/s41598-021-84945-9.
27. Ward LM, Kapoula Z. Dyslexics' Fragile Oculomotor Control Is Further
Chapter 4 Controversial vision therapies
99
Destabilized by Increased Text Difficulty. Brain Sci. 2021;11(8). doi:
10.3390/brainsci11080990.
28. Caldani S, Acquaviva E, Moscoso A, Peyre H, Delorme R, Bucci MP. Reading performance in children with ADHD: an eye-tracking study. Ann Dyslexia. 2022;72(3):552-65. doi: 10.1007/s11881-022-00269-x.
29. Zhou W, Fan Y, Chang Y, Liu W, Wang J, Wang Y. Pathogenesis of Comorbid ADHD and Chinese Developmental Dyslexia: Evidence From Eye-Movement Tracking and Rapid Automatized Naming. J Atten Disord. 2023;27(3):294-306. doi: 10.1177/10870547221140858.
30. Shalileh S, Ignatov D, Lopukhina A, Dragoy O. Identifying dyslexia in school pupils from eye movement and demographic data using artificial intelligence. PLoS One. 2023;18(11):e0292047. doi:
10.1371/journal.pone.0292047.
31. Vajs I, Papić T, Ković V, Savić AM, Janković MM. Accessible Dyslexia Detection with Real-Time Reading Feedback through Robust Interpretable Eye-Tracking Features. Brain Sciences. 2023;13(3):405.
32. El Hmimdi AE, Ward LM, Palpanas T, Kapoula Z. Predicting Dyslexia and Reading Speed in Adolescents from Eye Movements in Reading and Non­Reading Tasks: A Machine Learning Approach. Brain Sci. 2021;11(10). doi: 10.3390/brainsci11101337.
33. El Hmimdi AE, Ward LM, Palpanas T, Sainte Fare Garnot V, Kapoula Z. Predicting Dyslexia in Adolescents from Eye Movements during Free Painting Viewing. Brain Sci. 2022;12(8). doi: 10.3390/brainsci12081031.
34. Vajs I, Kovic V, Papic T, Savic AM, Jankovic MM. Spatiotemporal Eye­Tracking Feature Set for Improved Recognition of Dyslexic Reading Patterns in Children. Sensors (Basel). 2022;22(13). doi:
10.3390/s22134900.
35. Bilbao C, Pinero DP. Clinical Characterization of Oculomotricity in Children with and without Specific Learning Disorders. Brain Sci. 2020;10(11). doi: 10.3390/brainsci10110836.
36. Ayton LN, Abel LA, Fricke TR, McBrien NA. Developmental eye movement test: what is it really measuring? Optom Vis Sci. 2009;86(6):722-30. doi:
10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181a6a4b3 [doi].
37. Webber A, Wood J, Gole G, Brown B. DEM Test, Visagraph Eye Movement Recordings, and Reading Ability in Children. Optom Vis Sci. 2011;88(2):295-302. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31820846c0 [doi].
38. Medland C, Walter H, Woodhouse JM. Eye movements and poor reading: does the Developmental Eye Movement test measure cause or effect? Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 2010;30(6):740-7.
39. Wood JM, Black AA, Hopkins S, White SLJ. Vision and academic performance in primary school children. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 2018;38(5):516-24. doi: 10.1111/opo.12582.
reading. University of California Publications in Education. 1953;11(3):159-232.
41. Jaskowski P, Rusiak P. Posterior parietal cortex and developmental dyslexia. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars ). 2005;65(1):79-94.
42. Hari R, Renvall H. Impaired processing of rapid stimulus sequences in dyslexia. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2001;5(12):525-32.
43. Bogacz J, Mendilaharsu C, de M, S.A. Electro-oculographic abnormalities during pursuit movements in developmental dyslexia. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1974;36:651-6.
44. Judge J, Caravolas M, Knox PC. Smooth pursuit eye movements and phonological processing in adults with dyslexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology. 2006;23(8):1174-89.
45. Caldani S, Gerard CL, Peyre H, Bucci MP. Pursuit eye movements in dyslexic children: evidence for an immaturity of brain oculomotor structures? J Eye Mov Res. 2020;13(1). doi: 10.16910/jemr.13.1.5.
46. Jafarlou F, Ahadi M, Jarollahi F. Eye movement patterns in Iranian dyslexic children compared to non-dyslexic children. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2021;48(4):594-600. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2020.11.012.
47. Blythe HI, Kirkby JA, Liversedge SP. Comments on: "What Is Developmental Dyslexia?" Brain Sci. 2018, 8, 26. The Relationship between Eye Movements and Reading Difficulties. Brain Sci. 2018;8(6). doi: 10.3390/brainsci8060100.
48. Vernet M, Bellocchi S, Danna J, Massendari D, Jover M, Chaix Y, et al. The determinants of saccade targeting strategy in neurodevelopmental disorders: The influence of suboptimal reading experience. Vision Res. 2023;204:108162. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2022.108162.
49. Heller D, Radach R. Eye movements in reading: are two eyes better than one? In. Current Oculomotor Research: Physiological and Psychological Aspects. 1999:Eds.
50. Bucci MP, Bremond-Gignac D, Kapoula Z. Poor binocular coordination of saccades in dyslexic children. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008;246(3):417-28.
51. Jainta S, Jaschinski W, Wilkins AJ. Periodic letter strokes within a word affect fixation disparity during reading. J Vis. 2010;10(13):2. doi: 10.13.2 [pii];10.1167/10.13.2 [doi].
52. Jainta S, Kapoula Z. Dyslexic children are confronted with unstable binocular fixation while reading. PLoS One. 2011;6(4):e18694. doi:
10.1371/journal.pone.0018694 [doi].
53. Kapoula Z, Ganem R, Poncet S, Gintautas D, Eggert T, Bremond-Gignac D, et al. Free exploration of painting uncovers particularly loose yoking of saccades in dyslexics. Dyslexia. 2009;15(3):243-59. doi: 10.1002/dys.377 [doi].
54. Larter SC, Herse PR, Naduvilath TJ, Dain SJ. Spatial load factor in prediction of reading performance. Ophthal Physiol Opt. 2004;24:440-9.
40. Gilbert LC. Functional motor efficiency of the eyes and its relation to
Vision, Reading Difficulties and Visual Stress
100
visual attention in cognitive control of oculomotor readiness in students with reading disabilities. J Learn Disabil. 2001;34(2):107-18.
56. Solan HA, Ficarra A, Brannan JR, Rucker F. Eye movement efficiency in normal and reading disabled elementary school children: effects of varying luminance and wavelength. J Am Optom Assoc. 1998;69(7):455-
64.
57. Dodick D, Starling AJ, Wethe J, Pang Y, Messner LV, Smith C, et al. The Effect of In-School Saccadic Training on Reading Fluency and Comprehension in First and Second Grade Students. J Child Neurol. 2017;32(1):104-11. doi: 10.1177/0883073816668704.
58. Leong DF, Master CL, Messner LV, Pang Y, Smith C, Starling AJ. The effect of saccadic training on early reading fluency. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2014;53(9):858-64. doi: 10.1177/0009922814532520.
59. Dalvand H, Chamani N, Rahsepar-Fard K, Khorrami-Nejad M, Dadgar H. The effect of online visual games on visual perception, oculomotor, and balance skills of children with developmental dyslexia during the COVID­19 pandemic. Int Ophthalmol. 2023;43(12):5011-24. doi: 10.1007/s10792­023-02904-x.
60. Zeri F, De LM, Spinelli D, Zoccolotti P. Ocular Dominance Stability and Reading Skill: A Controversial Relationship. Optom Vis Sci. 2011. doi:
10.1097/OPX.0b013e318229635a [doi].
61. Evans BJW. Monovision: a review. Ophthal Physiol Opt. 2007;27:417-39.
62. Annett M. Dyslexia and handedness: developmental phonological and surface dyslexias are associated with different biases for handedness. Percept Mot Skills. 2011;112(2):417-25. doi:
10.2466/10.19.24.PMS.112.2.417-425.
63. Miles TR, Haslum MN, Wheeler TJ. Handedness in dyslexia: should this be routinely recorded? Dyslexia Review. 1996:7-9.
64. Stein J, Fowler S. Effect of monocular occlusion on visuomotor perception and reading in dyslexic children. Lancet. 1985;2(8446):69-73.
65. Bishop DVM. Unfixed reference, monocular occlusion, and developmental dyslexia: a critique. Br J Ophthalmol. 1989;73:209-15.
66. Evans BJW, Drasdo N, Richards IL. Investigation of accommodative and binocular function in dyslexia. Ophthal Physiol Opt. 1994;14(1):5-19.
67. Newman SP, Wadsworth JF, Archer R, Hockly R. Ocular dominance, reading, and spelling ability in schoolchildren. Br J Ophthalmol. 1985;69(3):228-32.
68. Evans BJW. Dyslexia: the Dunlop Test and tinted lenses. Optometry Today. 1993;33:26-30.
69. Stein JF. Review article: Representation of egocentric space in the posterior parietal cortex. Quart J Exp Physiol. 1989;74:583-606.
70. Cornelissen P, Bradley L, Fowler S, Stein J. What children see affects how they read. Devel Med Child Neurol. 1991;33:755-62.
71. Stein JF, Richardson AJ, Fowler MS. Monocular occlusion can improve binocular control and reading in dyslexics. Brain. 2000;123:164-70.
55. Solan HA, Larson S, Shelley-Tremblay J, Ficarra A, Silverman M. Role of
Chapter 4 Controversial vision therapies
101
72. Polikoff BR, Evans BJW, Legg CR. Is there a visual deficit in dyslexia resulting from a lesion of the right posterior parietal lobe? Ophthal Physiol Opt. 1995;15(5):513-7.
73. Salvato G, Peviani V, Scarpa P, Francione S, Castana L, Gallace A, et al. Investigating visuo-spatial neglect and visual extinction during intracranial electrical stimulations: The role of the right inferior parietal cortex. Neuropsychologia. 2021;162:108049. doi:
10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.108049.
74. Stein J, Fowler S. Diagnosis of dyslexia by means of a new indicator of eye dominance. Br J Ophthalmol. 1982;66:332-6.
75. Dunlop DB, Dunlop P, Fenelon B. Vision-laterality analysis in children with reading disability: the results of new techniques of examination. Cortex. 1973;9:227-36.
76. Aleci C, Belcastro E. Visual dyslexia: towards an operational definition from a correlational study. 2020. doi: 10.21037/aes-20-86.
77. Cornelissen P, Bradley L, Fowler S, Stein J. What children see affects how they spell. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology. 1994;36:716-
27.
78. Cornelissen P, Bradley L, Fowler S, Stein J. Covering one eye affects how some children read. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1992;34:296-304.
79. Barrett BT. A Critical Evaluation of the Evidence Supporting the Practice of Behavioural Vision Therapy. Ophthal Physiol Opt. 2008;29:4-25.
80. Pretorius E, Naude H, du Plessis E. The importance of determining vision functioning in remedial teaching. South African Optometrist. 61 (3), 101-
103. South Africal Optometrist. 2009;61(3):101-3.
81. Stephen CL, Donald DH. The relationship of selected visual-perceptual abilities to school learning. The Journal of Special Education. 1975;9(3):281-91. doi: 10.1177/002246697500900307.
82. Santi KL, Francis DJ, Currie D, Wang Q. Visual-Motor Integration Skills: Accuracy of Predicting Reading. Optom Vis Sci. 2014. doi:
10.1097/OPX.0000000000000473 [doi].
83. Kavale K, Mattson PD. "One jumped off the balance beam": meta­analysis of perceptual-motor training. J Learn Disabil. 1983;16(3):165-73. doi: 10.1177/002221948301600307.
84. Hopkins S, Black AA, White SLJ, Wood JM. Visual information processing skills are associated with academic performance in Grade 2 school children. Acta Ophthalmologica. 2019;97(8):1141-8. doi:
10.1111/aos.14172.
85. Findlay R, Black J, van der Werf B, Chelimo C, Grant CC, Anstice N. The effect of induced blur on the Beery-Buktenica developmental test of visual-motor integration and its supplemental tests. PLoS One. 2020;15(8):e0237807. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237807.
86. Vellutino FR. Alternative conceptualisation of dyslexia therefore evidence in support of a visual-verb hypothesis. Harvard Educational review. 1977;47(3):334-54.
Vision, Reading Difficulties and Visual Stress
102
87. Solan HA, Ciner EB. Visual perception and learning: issues and answers. J Am Optom Assoc. 1989;60(6):457-60.
88. Shute RH. Optometry and children's reading difficulties. In: Shute RJ, editor. Psychology in Vision Care. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann;
1991. p. 84-110.
89. Rose J. Identifying and teaching children and young people with dyslexia and literacy difficulties. Department for Education2009.
90. Blythe P, Goddard Blythe S. Viewpoint: Correcting clinical facts ­abnormal primitive reflexes in behavioural optometry and vision therapy. Journal Behavioral Optometry. 2013;23(5):138-42.
91. Jennings A. Behavioural optometry: a critical review. Optometry in Practice. 2000;1:67-78.
92. Rae C, Harasty JA, Dzendrowskyj TE, Simpson JM, J.M., Blamire AM, et al. Cerebellar morphology in developmental dyslexia. Neuropsychologia. 2002;40:1285-92.
93. Rae C, Lee MA, Dixon RM, Blamire AM, Thompson CH, Talcott J, et al. Metabolic abnormalities in developmental dyslexia detected by 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Lancet. 1998;351(9119):1849-52.
94. Nicolson RI, Fawcett AJ, Berry EL, Jenkins IH, Dean P, Brooks DJ. Association of abnormal cerebellar activation with motor learning difficulties in dyslexic adults. Lancet. 1999;353(9165):1662-7.
95. Nicolson RI, Fawcett AJ, Dean P. Time estimation deficits in developmental dyslexia: evidence of cerebellar involvement. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1995;259(1354):43-7.
96. Nicolson RI, Baum I, Schugens MM, Vincett AJ, Schulz A. Eyeblink conditioning indicates cerebellar abnormality in dyslexia. Exp Brain Res. 2002;143(1):42-50.
97. Levinson HN. The cereballar-vestibular basis of learning disabilities in children, adolescents and adults: hypothesis and study. Percept Mot Skills. 1988;67(3):983-1006.
98. Ramus F, Rosen S, Dakin SC, Day BL, Castellote JM, White S, et al. Theories of developmental dyslexia: insights from a multiple case study of dyslexic adults. Brain. 2003;126(4):841-65.
99. O'Hare A, Khalid S. The association of abnormal cerebellar function in children with developmental coordination disorder and reading difficulties. Dyslexia. 2002;8(4):234-48.
100. Bucci MP, Le TT, Wiener-Vacher S, Bremond-Gignac D, Bouet A, Kapoula Z. Poor postural stability in children with vertigo and vergence abnormalities. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50(10):4678-84. doi: iovs.09-3537 [pii];10.1167/iovs.09-3537 [doi].
101. Bucci MP, Melithe D, Ajrezo L, Bui-Quoc E, Gerard CL. The influence of oculomotor tasks on postural control in dyslexic children. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014;8:981. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00981.
102. Stein J. The current status of the magnocellular theory of developmental dyslexia. Neuropsychologia. 2019;130:66-77. doi:
Chapter 4 Controversial vision therapies
103
10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.03.022.
103. Ramus F, Pidgeon E, Frith U. The relationship between motor control and phonology in dyslexic children. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2003;44(5):712-22.
104. Reynolds D, Nicolson RI, Hambly H. Evaluation of an exercise-based treatment for children with reading difficulties. Dyslexia. 2003;9:48.
105. Richards IL, Moores E, Witton C, Reddy PA, Rippon G, Rochelle KS, et al. Science, sophistry and 'commercial sensitivity': comments on 'Evaluation of an exercise-based treatment for children with reading difficulties', by Reynolds, Nicolson and Hambly. Dyslexia. 2003;9(3):146-50.
106. Singleton C, Stuart M. Measurement mischief: a critique of Reynolds, Nicolson, and Hambly (2003). Dyslexia. 2003;9(3):151-60.
107. Snowling MJ, Hulme C. A critique of claims from Reynolds, Nicolson & Hambly (2003) that DDAT is an effective treatment for children with reading difficulties--'lies, damned lies and (inappropriate) statistics'? Dyslexia. 2003;9(2):127-35.
108. Rack J. The who, what, why and how of intervention programmes: comments on the DDAT evaluation. Dyslexia. 2003;9(3):137-9.
109. Dawson G, D'Souza S, Moreau D, Waldie K. Behavioural interventions to remediate learning disorders: a technical report. Auckland, New Zealand: University of Auckland; 2015.
110. Pecuch A, Gieysztor E, Telenga M, Wolanska E, Kowal M, Paprocka­Borowicz M. Primitive Reflex Activity in Relation to the Sensory Profile in Healthy Preschool Children. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(21). doi: 10.3390/ijerph17218210.
111. Bob P, Konicarova J, Raboch J. Disinhibition of Primitive Reflexes in Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorder: Insight Into Specific Mechanisms in Girls and Boys. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12:430685. doi:
10.3389/fpsyt.2021.430685.
112. McPhillips M, Hepper PG, Mulhern G. Effects of replicating primary-reflex movements on specific reading difficulties in children: a randomised, double-blind, controlled trial. Lancet. 2000;355(9203):537-41.
113. Prideaux LA, Marsh KA, Caplygin D. Efficacy of the cellfield Intervention for reading difficulties: An integrated computer‐based approach targeting deficits associated with dyslexia. Australian Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2005;10(2):51-62. doi: 10.1080/19404150509546789.
114. Sander J. Evaluation of the Cellfield intervention for dyslexia: behavioural and electrophysiological outcomes. Psychology. Wuppertal: Wuppertal;
2008.
115. Le Floch A, Ropars G. Left-right asymmetry of the Maxwell spot centroids in adults without and with dyslexia. Proc Biol Sci. 2017;284(1865). doi:
10.1098/rspb.2017.1380.
116. Lexilens: Lexilens. https://lexilens.com/ (2021). Accessed 19/5/23 2023.
117. Huron, Ramus F. The lamps and glasses designed for children with dyslexia: what does the research say. 2021.
Vision, Reading Difficulties and Visual Stress
104
118. Lubineau M, Watkins CP, Glasel H, Dehaene S. Does word flickering improve reading? Negative evidence from four experiments using low and high frequencies. Proc Biol Sci. 2023;290(2008):20231665. doi:
10.1098/rspb.2023.1665.
119. Laycox CA, Thompson L, Haggerty JA, Wilkins AJ, Haigh SM. Flicker and Reading Speed: Effects on Individuals with Visual Sensitivity. Journal of Vision. 2023;23(9):4782-. doi: 10.1167/jov.23.9.4782.
120. Wilkins A. Intermittent illumination from VDUs and fluorescent lighting. Human Factors. 1986;28(1):75-81.
Chapter 4 Controversial vision therapies
105
Chapter 5
The magnocellular-dorsal (M-D) deficit
and associated theories
Chapter abstract
There are several visual pathways that convey different types of
information to the brain. We review evidence that in dyslexic
individuals there is a deficit in one of these pathways, the
magnocellular-dorsal (transient; M-D) pathway. A large body of
research supports an M-D deficit as a correlate of dyslexia, but the
evidence that the deficit plays a causal role in reading difficulty is less
compelling. The M-D hypothesis has been linked to impaired
visuospatial attention in reading difficulty, and to difficulties in
processing crowded contours. Preliminary evidence concerning the
treatment of these deficits with action video games is discussed.
The magnocellular-dorsal (M-D) deficit
Background
The human visual system processes the visual world via three main
parallel pathways. The two most prominent of these pathways are the
parvocellular-ventral (sustained) pathway and magnocellular-dorsal
(transient) pathway (Figure 5.1, Table 5.1). There is also a third pathway,
the koniocellular pathway, which has not been linked to reading
difficulties, but to visual snow.1
It is difficult to disentangle impairments in the underlying magno
cells of the dorsal pathway from the functioning of the pathway itself
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2024 A. J. Wilkins and B. J. W. Evans, Vision, Reading Difficulties and Visual Stress,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-65568-5_5
107
(Figure 5.1), and so magnocellular-dorsal (M-D) is used below to
describe this pathway. There is considerable evidence that many
people with dyslexia have a deficit of the M-D pathway,2 although the
evidence has been disputed,3 and others have argued for different
types of high-level visual deficits in dyslexia.
4 5
This evidence, and the
role that such a deficit may or may not play in reading difficulty, is
reviewed below.
Figure 5.1. The magnocellular-dorsal and parvocellular-ventral pathways.
During “bottom-up” visual processing when reading, signals from retinal
magnocells are projected to magnocellular layers of the lateral geniculate
nucleus (LGN). From the LGN, signals are projected to V1 (visual cortex),
where the visual pathway diverges into the dorsal, “where”, and ventral,
“what”, streams. The dorsal pathway, dominated by magnocells, consists of
a hierarchy of cortical areas, namely, V2, V3, MT/V5 and the posterior
parietal cortex (PPC). In “top-down” visual attention during reading,
neuronal signals are sent from the PPC to MT/V5, V2, V1 and LGN. The PPC
and MT/V5 also project to the pre-frontal cortex (PFC), which plays a key
role in the control of eye-movements during reading. The ventral stream
Vision, Reading Difficulties and Visual Stress
108