Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5398_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
15 Мб
Скачать
☆
Advances in Drug Delivery to the Reproductive System 399
and clinical aspects in adults. Urologia 81(4): 200–208
5. Frame I, Cant S (2015) Current challenges in prostate cancer: an interview with Prostate Cancer UK. BMC Med 13:166
6. Gleicher N (2013) Why are reproductive can­cers more common in nulliparous women? Reprod Biomed Online 26(5):416–419
7. Inhorn MC, Patrizio P (2015) Infertility around the globe: new thinking reproductive technologies and global move­ments in the 21st century. Hum Reprod Update 21(4):411–426
8. Meier RK (2018) Polycystic ovary syndrome. Nurs Clin North Am 53(3):407–420
9. Grube M, Neis F, Brucker SY et al (2019) Uterine fibroids – current trends and strate­gies. Surg Technol Int 34:257–263
10. Lin LJ, Abudousalamu Z et al (2024) Advanc­ing ovarian cancer therapeutics: the role of targeted drug delivery systems. Int J Nano­medicine 19:9351–9370
11. Thapa R, Gurung S, Parat MO et al (2022) Application of sol-gels for treatment of gynae­cological conditions-physiological perspec­tives and emerging concepts in intravaginal drug delivery. Gels (Basel, Switzerland) 8(2): 99
12. Acharya B, Behera A, Behera S et al (2024) Recent advances in nanotechnology-based drug delivery systems for the diagnosis and treatment of reproductive disorders. ACS Appl Bio Mater 7(3):1336–1361
13. Smolen
14. Hukkanen J, M€antyl€a M, Kangas L et al
15. Zagami S, Roudsari R, Janghorban R et al
16. Shandilya R, Pathak N, Lohiya NK et al
17. Friend D (2017) Drug delivery for the treat-
´
ski M, Karolewicz B, Gołkowska A et al (2021) Emulsion-based multicompart­ment vaginal drug carriers: from nanoemul­sions to nanoemulgels. Int J Mol Sci 22(12): 6455
(1998) Expression of cytochrome P450 genes encoding enzymes active in the metab­olism of tamoxifen in human uterine endome­trium. Pharmacol Toxicol 82(2):93–97
(2018) A qualitative study of the challenges experienced by Iranian infertile couples after unsuccessful assisted reproductive technolo­gies. Int J Women’s Health Reprod Sci 7(3): 331–338
(2020) Nanotechnology in reproductive medicine: opportunities for clinical transla­tion. Clin Exp Reprod Med 47(4):245
ment of endometriosis and uterine fibroids. Drug Deliv Transl Res 7(6):829–839
on gender,
18. Tinkle S, McNeil SE, Mu¨hlebach S et al (2014) Nanomedicines: addressing the scien­tific and regulatory gap. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1313:35–56
19. Khan I, Saeed K, Khan I (2019) Nanoparti­cles: properties, applications and toxicities. Arab J Chem 12:908–931
20. Thiruppathi R, Mishra S, Ganapathy M et al (2017) Nanoparticle functionalization and its potentials for molecular imaging. Adv Sci 4: 1600279
21. Ali H, Kilic G, Vincent K et al (2013) Nano­medicine for uterine leiomyoma therapy. Ther Deliv 4:161–175
22. Kaitu’u-Lino TUJ, Pattison S, Ye L et al (2013) Targeted nanoparticle delivery of doxorubicin into placental tissues to treat ectopic pregnancies. Endocrinology 154: 911–919
23. de Arau´jo TE, Milia´n ICB, de Souza G et al (2020) Experimental models of maternal fetal interface and their potential use for nano­technology applications. Cell Biol Int 44(1): 36–50
24. Hua S, Wu SY (2013) The use of lipid-based nanocarriers for targeted pain therapies. Front Pharmacol 4:143
25. Sercombe L, Veerati T, Moheimani F et al (2015) Advances and challenges of liposome assisted drug delivery. Front Pharmacol 6:286
26. Kirpotin DB, Drummond DC, Shao Y et al (2006) Antibody targeting of long-circulating lipidic nanoparticles does not increase tumor localization but does increase internalization in animal models. Cancer Res 66:6732–6740
27. Awada A, Bondarenko IN, Bonneterre J et al (2014) A randomized controlled phase II trial of a novel composition of paclitaxel embed­ded into neutral and cationic lipids targeting tumor endothelial cells in advanced triple­negative breast cancer (TNBC). Ann Oncol 25:824–831
28. Fuchs AR, Fuchs F, Husslein P et al (1984) Oxytocin receptors in the human uterus dur­ing pregnancy and parturition. Am J Obstet Gynecol 150:734–741
29. Paul JW, Hua S, Ilicic M et al (2017) Drug delivery to the human and mouse uterus using immunoliposomes targeted to the oxytocin receptor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 216:283–2e1
30. Zhang B, Liang R, Zheng M et al (2019) Surface-functionalized nanoparticles as effi­cient tools in targeted therapy of pregnancy complications. Int J Mol Sci 20:3642
31. Hyun H, cured glycol chitosan hydrogel for ovarian cancer drug delivery. Mar Drugs 17:41
Park MH, Jo G et al (2019) Photo-
–
400 Dhaval J. Kamothi et al.
32. Elshafeey AH, Bendas ER, Mohamed OH (2009) Intranasal microemulsion of sildenafil citrate: in vitro evaluation and in vivo pharma­cokinetic study in rabbits. AAPS PharmSci­Tech 10:361–367
33. Atipairin A, Chunhachaichana C, Nakpheng T et al (2020) Development of a sildenafil citrate microemulsion-loaded hydrogel as a potential system for penis and its cellular metabolic mechanism. Pharmaceutics 12:1055
34. Mansour D, Inki P, Gemzell-Danielsson K (2010) Efficacy of contraceptive methods: a review of the literature. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 15:4–16
35. Fuchs R, Taylor D, Jenkins DW et al (2020) Levonorgestrel release rates measured through analysis of two-rod contraceptive explants. Contraception 2:100039
36. Mc Conville C, Major I, Friend DR et al (2012) Development of polylactide and poly­ethylene vinyl acetate blends for the manufac­ture of vaginal rings. J Biomed 100:891–895
37. Ingrole RS, Azizoglu E, Dul M et al (2021) Trends of microneedle technology in the sci­entific literature, patents, clinical trials and internet activity. Biomaterials 267:120491
38. Larran˜eta E, Lutton RE, Woolfson AD et al (2016) Microneedle arrays as transdermal and intradermal drug delivery systems: materials science, manufacture and commercial devel­opment. Mater Sci Eng R Rep 104:1–32
39. Singh P, Carrier A, Chen Y et al (2019) Poly­meric microneedles for controlled transder­mal drug delivery. J Control Release 315:97– 113
40. Sabri AH, Kim Y, Marlow M et al (2020) Intradermal and transdermal drug delivery using microneedles–fabrication, performance evaluation and application to lymphatic deliv­ery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 153:195–215
41. Suchaoin W, Bernkop-Schnu¨ rch A (2017) Nanocarriers protecting toward an intestinal pre-uptake metabolism. Nanomedicine 12: 255–269
42. DeMuth PC, Moon JJ, Suh H et al (2012) Releasable layer-by-layer assembly of stabi­lized lipid nanocapsules on microneedles for enhanced transcutaneous vaccine delivery. ACS Nano 6(9):8041–8051
43. Lin S, Quan G, Hou A et al (2019) Strategy for hypertrophic scar therapy: improved deliv­ery of triamcinolone acetonide using mechan­ically robust tip-concentrated dissolving microneedle array. J Control Release 306: 69–82
drug delivery to the
44. Lan X, She J, Lin DA et al (2018) Microneedle-mediated delivery of lipid­coated cisplatin nanoparticles for efficient and safe cancer therapy. Appl Mater Interfaces 10:33060–33069
45. Permana AD, Tekko IA, McCrudden MT et al (2019) Solid lipid nanoparticle-based dissol­ving microneedles: a promising intradermal lymph targeting drug delivery system with potential for enhanced treatment of lymphatic filariasis. J Control Release 316:34–52
46. Lu X, Sun Y, Han M et al (2023) Triptorelin nanoparticle-loaded microneedles for use in assisted reproductive technology. Drug Deliv 30:2226367
47. Magdanz V, Sanchez S, Schmidt OG (2013) Development of a sperm-flagella driven micro-bio-robot. Adv Mater 25(45): 6581–6588
48. Singh AV, Ansari MHD, Mahajan M et al (2020) Sperm cell driven microrobots­emerging opportunities and challenges for biologically inspired robotic design. Micro­machines 11(4):448
49. Bunea AI, Taboryski R (2020) Recent advances in microswimmers for biomedical applications. Micromachines 11(12):1048
50. Xu H, Medina-Sa (2020) Human spermbots for patient­representative 3D ovarian cancer cell treat­ment. Nanoscale 12(39):20467–20481
51. Subi MTM, Nandhakumar S, Vasanthi HR (2024) Vaginal drug delivery system: a promising route of drug administration for local and systemic diseases. Drug Discov Today 29(6):104012
52. De Ziegler DOMINIQUE, Bulletti C, De Monstier BE´ATRICE et al (1997) The first uterine pass effect. Ann N Y Acad Sci 828: 291–299
53. Ciolacu DE, Nicu R, Ciolacu F (2020) Cellulose-based hydrogels as sustained drug­delivery systems. Materials 13:5270
54. Ensign LM, Cone R, Hanes J (2014) Nanoparticle-based drug delivery to the vagina: a review. J Control Release 190:500– 514
55. Maestrelli F, Jug M, Cirri M et al (2018) Characterization and microbiological evalua­tion of chitosan-alginate microspheres for cefixime vaginal administration. Carbohydr Polym 192:176 –183
56. Alqahtani F, Aleanizy F, El Tahir E et al (2020) Antibacterial activity of chitosan nano­particles against pathogenic N. gonorrhoea. Int J Nanomedicine 15:7877–7887
´
nchez M, Zhang W et al
Advances in Drug Delivery to the Reproductive System 401
57. Tug˘cu-Demiro¨z F, Saar S, Kara AA et al (2021) Development and characterization of chitosan nanoparticles loaded nanofiber hybrid system for vaginal controlled release of benzydamine. Eur J Pharm Sci 161: 105801
58. Permana AD, Asri RM, Amir MN et al (2023) Development of with mucoadhesion properties loaded with metronidazole gel-flakes for improved bacte­rial vaginosis treatment. Pharmaceutics 15: 1529
59. Salah S, Awad GE, Makhlouf AI (2018) Improved vaginal retention and enhanced antifungal activity of miconazole microsponges gel: formulation development and in vivo therapeutic efficacy in rats. Eur J Pharm Sci 114:255–266
60. Fernando HV, Chan LL, Dang N et al (2019) Controlled delivery of the antiprotozoal agent (tinidazole) from intravaginal polymer matri­ces for treatment of the sexually transmitted infection, trichomoniasis. Pharm Dev Tech­nol 24:348–356
61. Ariza-Sa´enz M, Espina M, Calpena A et al (2018) Design, characterization, and bio­pharmaceutical behavior of nanopar ticles loaded with an HIV-1 fusion inhibitor pep­tide. Mol Pharm 15:5005–5018
62. Li N, Xie X, Hu Y et al (2019) Herceptin­conjugated liposomes co-loaded with doxo­rubicin and simvastatin in targeted prostate cancer therapy. Am J Transl Res 11:1255
63. Kim S, Traore YL, Ho EA et al (2018) Design and development of pH-responsive polyure­thane membranes for intravaginal release of nanomedicines. Acta Biomater 82:12–23
64. Teworte S, Aleandri S, Weber JR et al (2023) Mucoadhesive 3D printed vaginal ovules to treat endometriosis and fibrotic uterine dis­eases. Eur J Pharm Sci 188:106501
65. Liang Z, Chen Y, Zhao Y et al (2017) miR-200c suppresses endometriosis by tar­geting MALAT1 in vitro and in vivo. Stem Cell Res Ther 8:1–11
66. Nave R (2019) Development of an intravagi­nal ring delivering simultaneously anastrozole and levonorgestrel: a pharmacokinetic per­spective. Drug Deliv 26:586–594
67. Taylor J, Sharp A, Rannard SP et al (2023) Nanomedicine strategies to improve thera­peutic agents for the prevention and treat­ment of preter m birth and future directions. Nanoscale Adv 5:1870– 1889
68. Zierden HC, Ortiz JI, DeLong K et al (2021) Enhanced drug delivery to the reproductive tract using nanomedicine reveals therapeutic
thermoresponsive hydrogels
options for prevention of preterm birth. Sci Transl Med 13:6245
69. Zhang Y, Raia N, Peterson A et al (2020) Injectable silk-based hydrogel as an alternative to cervical cerclage: a rabbit study. Tissue Eng Part A 26:379–386
70. Li WZ, Han WX, Guan L et al (2024) Hydro­gel microspheres based on Bletilla striata poly­saccharide as a promising cervical positioning drug delivery system. J Drug Deliv Sci Tech­nol 95:105525
71. Ji J, Zhao C, Hua C et al (2024) 3D printing cervical implant scaffolds incorporated with drug-loaded carboxylated chitosan micro­spheres for long-term anti-HPV protein deliv­ery. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 10:1544–1553
72. Bahamondes L, Valeria Bahamondes M, Shul­man LP (2015) Non-contraceptive benefits of hormonal and intrauterine reversible traceptive methods. 21:640–651
73. Sivasankaran S, Jonnalagadda S (2021) Advances in controlled release hormonal tech­nologies for contraception: a review of exist­ing devices, underlying mechanisms, and future directions. J Control Release 330: 797–811
74. Beatty MN, Blumenthal PD (2009) The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system: safety, efficacy, and patient acceptability. Ther Clin Risk Manag 5(3):561–574
75. Salmoria GV, Vieira FE, Muenz EA et al (2018) Additive manufacturing of PE/fluor­ouracil/progesterone intrauterine device for endometrial and ovarian cancer treatments. Polym Test 71:312–317
76. Lin X, Wei M, Li TC et al (2013) A compari­son of intrauterine balloon, intrauterine con­traceptive device and hyaluronic acid gel in the prevention of adhesion reformation following hysteroscopic surgery for Asherman syn­drome: a cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 170:512–516
77. Heinberg EM, McCoy TW, Pasic R (2008) The perforated intrauterine device: endo­scopic retrieval. JSLS 12:97
78. Sanford M (2013) Avanafil: a review of its use in patients with erectile dysfunction. Drug Aging 30:853 –862
79. Kurakula M, Solid lipid nanoparticles for transdermal deliv­ery of avanafil: optimization, formulation, in-vitro and ex-vivo studies. J Liposome Res 26:288–296
80. Han G, (2010) Nanoparticles as a novel delivery
Ahmed
Tar M, Kuppam DS, Friedman A et al
Hum Reprod Update
OA, Fahmy UA (2016)
con-
402 Dhaval J. Kamothi et al.
vehicle for therapeutics targeting erectile dys­function. J Sex Med 7:224–233
81. Abdelalim LR, Abdallah OY, Elnaggar YS (2020) High efficacy, rapid onset nanobiolo­somes of sildenafil as a topical therapy for erectile dysfunction in aged rats. Int J Pharm 591:119978
82. Gur S, Abdel-Mageed AB, Sikka SC et al (2018) Advances in stem cell therapy for erec­tile dysfunction. 18(11):1137–1150
83. Caroppo E, Niederberger CS (2023) Follicle­stimulating hormone treatment for male fac­tor infertility. Fertil Steril 119:173–179
84. Talarico C (2023) Progesterone has no impact on the beneficial effects of estradiol treatment in high-fat-fed ovariectomized mice. Curr Issues Mol Biol 45(5):3965–3976
85. Ramesh P (2023) The role of progesterone/ estradiol (p4/e2) ratio in predicting assisted reproductive technology (art) outcome in agonist cycles with elevated progesterone levels on trigger day: a prospective study. Int J Infertil Fetal Med 14(2):75–79
86. Palacios S (2008) Advances in hormone replacement therapy: making the menopause manageable. BMC Womens Health 8:22
87. Zhen S, Liu Y, Lu J et al (2020) Human papillomavirus oncogene manipulation using clustered regularly interspersed short palin­dromic repeats/Cas9 delivered by pH-sensitive cationic liposomes. Hum Gene Ther 31:309–324
88. Rosenblum D, Gutkin A, Kedmi R et al (2020) CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing using targeted lipid nanoparticles for cancer ther­apy. Sci Adv 6(47):9450
89. Wiweko B (2019) Cutting edge of reproduc­tive medicine. Fertil Reprod 1(02):78–87
90. Joshi A, Garg H, Ablan SD et al (2011) Evi­dence of a role for soluble N-ethylmaleimide­sensitive factor attachment protein receptor (SNARE) machinery in HIV-1 assembly and release. J Biol Chem 286:29861–29871
91. Gu J, Yang S, Ho EA (2015) Biodegradable film for the targeted delivery of siRNA-loaded nanoparticles to vaginal immune cells. Mol Pharm 12:2889–2903
92. Zhang PY, Yu (2020) Precise personalized medicine in gynecology cancer and infertility. Front Cell Dev Biol 7:382
93. Gutie´rrez-Mateo C, Colls P, Sa´nchez-Garcı´a J et al (2011) Validation of microarray compar­ative genomic hybridization for comprehen­sive chromosome analysis of embryos. Fertil Steril 95:953– 958
Expert Opin Biol Ther
94. Yurttas Beim P, Parfitt DE, Tan L (2017) At the dawn of personalized reproductive medi­cine: opportunities and challenges with incor­porating multigene panel testing into fertility care. J Assist Reprod Genet 34:1573–1576
95. Fiorentino F, Biricik A, Bono S et al (2014) Development and validation of a next­generation sequencing–based protocol for 24-chromosome aneuploidy screening of embryos. Fertil Steril 101:1375–1382
96. Yan L, Huang L, Xu L et al (2015) Live births after simultaneous avoidance of monogenic diseases and chromosome abnormality by next-generation sequencing with linkage ana­lyses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112:15964 – 15969
97. Psychoyos A (1986) Uterine receptivity for nidation a. Ann N Y Acad Sci 476:36–42
98. Murphy CR (2004) Uterine receptivity and the plasma membrane transformation. Cell Res 14:259 –267
´
99. Dı
az-Gimeno P, Horcajadas JA, Martı Conejero JA et al (2011) A genomic tic tool for based on the transcriptomic signature. Fertil Steril 95:50–60
100. Garrido-Go et al (2013) Profiling the endometrial Steril 99:1078–1085
101. Hashem NM, Sallam SM (2020) Reproduc­tive performance of goats treated with free gonadorelin or nanoconjugated gonadorelin at estrus. Domest Anim Endocrinol 71: 106390
102. Helbling IM, Busatto CA, Fioramonti SA et al (2018) Preparation of TPP-crosslinked chitosan microparticles by spray drying for the controlled delivery of progesterone intended for estrus synchronization in cattle. Pharm Res 35:1–15
103. Oliveira JE, Medeiros ES, Cardozo L et al (2013) Development of poly (lactic acid) nanostructured membranes for the controlled delivery of progesterone to livestock animals. Mater Sci Eng C 33:844–849
104. Fogolari O, Felippe AC, Leimann FV et al (2017) Method validation for progesterone determination in poly (methyl methacrylate) nanoparticles synthesized via miniemulsion polymerization. Int J Polym Sci 2017: 9603140
105. Wyns C, Curaba M, Vanabelle B et al (2010) Options for fertility preservation in prepuber­tal boys. Hum Reprod Update 16:312–328
106. Del V (2019) Significant benefits of nanoparticles
human endometrial receptivity
´
mez T, Ruiz-Alonso M, Blesa D
receptivity: clinical results. Fertil
ento F, Vermeulen M, Ucakar B et al
gene signature of
´
nez-
diagnos-
Advances in Drug Delivery to the Reproductive System 403
containing a necrosis inhibitor on mice testic­ular tissue autografts outcomes. Int J Mol Sci 20:5833
107. Yu MK, Kim D, Lee IH et al (2011) Image­guided prostate cancer therapy using aptamer-functionalized thermally cross­linked superparamagnetic iron oxide nanopar­ticles. Small 7:2241–2249
108. Hindler K, Cleeland CS, Rivera E et al (2006) The role gist 11:306–315
109. Nahta R, Esteva FJ (2003) HER-2-targeted therapy: lessons learned and future directions. Clin Cancer Res 9:5078–5084
110. Li J, Regev G, Patel SK et al (2019) Rational design of a multipurpose bioadhesive vaginal film for co-delivery of dapivirine and levonor­gestrel. Int J Pharm 12:1
111. Hawk ET, Viner JL, Dannenberg A et al (2002) COX-2 in cancer—a player that’s defining the rules. J Natl Cancer Inst 94: 545–546
112. Tian J, Guo F, Chen Y, Li Y et al (2019) Nanoliposomal formulation encapsulating celecoxib and genistein inhibiting COX-2 pathway and Glut-1 receptors to prevent prostate cancer cell proliferation. Cancer Lett 448:1– 10
113. Ebeid K, Meng X, Thiel KW et al (2018) Synthetically lethal nanoparticles for treat­ment of endometrial cancer. Nat Nanotech­nol 13:72–81
114. Momenimovahed Z, Tiznobaik A, Taheri S et al (2019) Ovarian cancer in the world: epidemiology and risk factors. Int J Women’s Health 11:287 –299
115. Xiong X, Arvizo RR, Saha S et al (2014) Sensitization of ovarian cancer cells to cis­platin by gold nanoparticles. Oncotarget 5: 6453
116. Lee KJ, An JH, Chun JR et al (2013) In vitro analysis of the anti-cancer activity of mitoxan­trone loaded on magnetic nanoparticles. J Biomed Nanotechnol 9:1071 –1075
117. Liang C, Yang Y, Ling Y et al (2011) Improved therapeutic effect of folate­decorated PLGA–PEG nanoparticles for endometrial carcinoma. Bioorg Med Chem 19:4057–4066
118. Sanna V, Pintus G, Roggio AM et al (2011) Targeted biocompatible nanoparticles for the delivery of (-)-epigallocatechin 3-gallate to prostate cancer cells. J Med Chem 54:1321– 1332
119. Han XJ, Wei YF, Wan YY et al (2014) Devel­opment of a novel liposomal nanodelivery system for bioluminescence imaging and
of statins in cancer therapy. Oncolo-
targeted drug delivery in ErbB2­overexpressing metastatic ovarian carcinoma. Int J Mol Med 34:1225–1232
120. Gan BK, Yong CY, Ho KL et al (2018) Tar­geted delivery of cell penetrating peptide virus-like nanoparticles to skin cancer cells. Sci Rep 8:8499
121. Koshkaryev A, Piroyan A, Torchilin VP (2012) Increased apoptosis in cancer cells in vitro and in vivo by ceramides in transferrin-modified liposomes. Cancer Biol Ther 13:50–60
122. Deshpande P, Jhaveri A, Pattni B et al (2018) Transferrin and octaarginine modified dual­functional liposomes with improved cancer cell targeting and enhanced intracellular deliv­ery for the treatment of ovarian cancer. Drug Deliv 25:517–532
123. Khayrani AC, Mahmud H, Oo AKK et al (2019) Targeting ovarian cancer cells overex­pressing CD44 with immunoliposomes encapsulating glycosylated paclitaxel. Int J Mol Sci 20:1042
124. Dasa SSK, Diakova G, Suzuki R et al (2018) Plectin-targeted liposomes enhance the ther­apeutic efficacy of a PARP inhibitor in the treatment of ovarian cancer. Theranostics 8: 2782
125. Faraoni I, Graziani G (2018) Role of BRCA mutations in cancer treatment with poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. Cancers 10:487
126. Murphy CJ, Gole AM, Stone JW et al (2008) Gold nanoparticles in biology: beyond toxic­ity to cellular imaging. Acc Chem Res 41: 1721–1730
127. Steinbach JM, Weller CE, Booth CJ et (2012) Polymer siRNA for treatment of HSV-2 genital infec­tion. J Control Release 162:102–110
128. Jiang J, Liu G, Kickhoefer VA et al (2017) A protective vaccine against Chlamydia genital infection using vault nanoparticles without an added adjuvant. Vaccines 5:3
129. Antoine TE, Hadigal SR, Yakoub AM et al (2016) Intravaginal zinc oxide tetrapod nano­particles as novel immunoprotective agents against genital herpes. J Immunol 196: 4566–4575
130. Johal HS, Garg T, Rath G et al (2016) Advanced topical drug delivery system for the management of vaginal candidiasis. Dr ug Deliv 23:550–563
131. Ning YM, somal doxorubicin in combination with bor­tezomib for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Oncology 21:1503–1508
nanoparticles encapsulating
He K, Dagher R et al (2007) Lipo-
al
404 Dhaval J. Kamothi et al.
132. Ananworanich J, Sacdalan CP, Pinyakorn S et al (2016) Virological and immunological characteristics of HIV-infected individuals at the earliest stage of infection. J Virus Erad 2: 43–48
133. van Leth F, Phanuphak P, Ruxrungtham K et al (2004) Comparison of first-line antire­troviral therapy with rapine, efavirenz, or both drugs, plus stavudine and lamivudine: a randomised open-label trial, the 2NN study. Lancet 363: 1253–1263
134. Nayak D, Boxi A, Ashe S et al (2017) Stavu­dine loaded gelatin liposomes for HIV ther­apy: preparation, characterization and in vitro cytotoxic evaluation. Mater Sci Eng C 73: 406–416
135. Missmer SA, Tu FF, Agarwal SK et al (2021) Impact of endometriosis on life-course poten­tial: a narrative review. Int J Gen Med 14:9– 25
136. Zhao MD, Sun YM, Fu GF et al (2012) Gene therapy of endometriosis introduced by poly­meric micelles with glycolipid-like structure. Biomaterials 33:634–643
137. Bedin A, Maranha˜o RC, Tavares ER et al (2019) Nanotechnology for the treatment of deep endometriosis: uptake of lipid core nanoparticles by LDL receptors in endome­triotic foci. Clinics 74:989
138. Malik R, Maikhuri JP, Gupta G et al (2011) Biodegradable nanoparticles in the murine vagina: trans-cervical retrograde transport and induction of proinflammatory cytokines. J Biomed Nanotechnol 7:45–46
139. Iftikhar M, Noureen A, Uzair M et al (2021) Perspectives of nanoparticles in male infertil­ity: evidence for induced abnormalities in sperm production. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18:1758
140. Hu LX, Hu SF, Rao M et al (2018) Studies of acute and subchronic systemic toxicity asso­ciated with a copper/low-density polyethyl­ene nanocomposite intrauterine device. Int J Nanomedicine 13:4913–4926
141. Luyt AS, Molefi JA, Krump H (2006) Ther­mal, mechanical and electrical properties of copper powder filled low-density and linear low-density polyethylene composites. Polym Degrad Stab 91:1629–1636
142. Yan M, Zhang Y, Wu Z et al (2022) Recent progress in advanced biomaterials for long­acting reversible contraception. J Nanobio­technol 20:138
143. Barroso PAA, Nascimento DR, Neto MFDL (2023) Therapeutic potential of
regimens including nevi-
nanotechnology in reproduction disorders and possible limitations. Zygote 31:433–440
144. Ahn S, Chantre CO, Ardon GM (2020) Biomimetic and estrogenic fibers promote tissue repair in mice and human skin via estrogen receptor β. Biomaterials 255: 120149
145. Song Y, Hu R, Li F et al (2024) In view of ovarian steroidogenesis and luteal construc­tion to explore the effects of Bushen Huoxue recipe in mice of ovarian hyperstimulation. J Ethnopharmacol 318:116913
146. Pandey M, Choudhury H, Abdul-Aziz A et al (2020) Promising drug delivery approaches to treat microbial infections in the vagina: a recent update. Polymers 13(1):26
147. Wang X, Wu D, Li W et al (2021) Emerging biomaterials for reproductive medicine. Eng Regen 2:230–245
148. Patil N, Maheshwari R, Wairkar S (2023) Advances in progesterone delivery systems: still work in progress? Int J Pharm 643: 123250
149. Mbituyimana B, Adhikari M, Qi F et al (2023) Microneedle-based cell delivery and cell sampling for biomedical applications. JCR 362:692–714
150. Baryakova TH, Pogostin BH, Langer R et al (2023) Overcoming barriers to patient adher­ence: the case for developing innovative drug delivery systems. Nat Rev Drug Discov 22(5): 387–409
151. Liu J, Li S, Wang J et al (2023) Application of nano drug delivery system (NDDS) in cancer therapy: a perspective. Recent Pat Anticancer Drug Discov 18(2):125–132
152. Singh AN, Mahanti B, Bera K (2021) Novel drug delivery system & it’s future: an over­view. IJPE 9(2):1070–1088
153. Sainz V, Conniot J, Matos AI et al (2015) Regulatory aspects on nanomedicines. BBRC 468(3):504–510
154. Kozarewicz P, Loftsson T (2018) Novel excipients–regulatory challenges and perspectives–the EU insight. Int J Pharm 546(1–2):176–179
155. Panch T, Szolovits P, Atun R (2018) Artificial intelligence, machine learning and health sys­tems. J Glob Health 8(2):020303
156. France´s-Herrero E, Rodrı´guez-Eguren A, Go´mez-A´lvarez M et al (2022) Future chal­lenges and opportunities of extracellular matrix hydrogels in female reproductive med­icine. Int J Mol Sci 23(7):3765
157. Mak KK, ficial intelligence in drug discovery and development. In: Hock FJ, Pugsley MK
Wong YH, Pichika MR (2023) Arti-
˜
a HAM, Gonzalez
Advances in Drug Delivery to the Reproductive System 405
(eds) Drug discovery and evaluation: safety and pharmacokinetic assays. Springer, Cham
158. Boso DP, (2020) Drug delivery: experiments, mathe­matical modelling and machine learning. Comput Biol Med 123:103820
159. Adekoya OC, Yibowei ME, Adekoya GJ et al (2022) A mini-review on the application of machine learning in polymer nanogels for drug delivery. Mater Today Proc 62:141–144
160. Kumari R, Kaur P, Verma SK et al (2024) Omics-based cutting-edge technologies for identifying predictive biomarkers to measure the impact of air borne particulate matter exposure on male reproductive health. JRHM 5(2):1
161. Tian Y, Li M, Yang J et al (2024) Preimplan­tation genetic testing in the current era, a
Di Mascolo D, Santagiuliana R et al
review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 309(5): 1787–1799
162. Pirmohamed M (2023) Pharmacogenomics: current status and future perspectives. Nat Rev Genet 24(6):350–362
163. Chin AHB, Nguma JB, Ahmad MF (2024) Stringent criteria needed for germline genome editing of human IVF embryos. JARG 41(7):1727–1731
164. Zhu D, Barabadi M, McDonald C et al (2024) Implications of maternal-fetal health on perinatal stem cell banking. Gene Ther 31(3):65–73
165. Kim HK, future prospects of stem cell therapy for infer­tile patients with premature ovarian insuffi­ciency. Biomol Ther 14(2):242
Kim TJ (2024) Current status and
Chapter 18
Drug Delivery in Rare Diseases: Orphan Drugs and Therapies
Anil Kumar, Manjulendra Kumar, and Sudhir Kumar
Abstract
Nanoparticles are one of the innovative drug delivery systems, particularly valuable for the targeted delivery of orphan drugs in rare diseases. Their nanoscale size and large surface area to volume ratio allow for enhanced interaction with biological systems, providing a platform for efficient drug loading and controlled release. Lipid-based nanoparticles, such as liposomes and solid lipid nanoparticles, offer biocompatibility and stability, ensuring sustained and targeted delivery with minimal toxicity. Polymeric nanoparticles, including dendrimers, enable the solubilization of hydrophobic drugs and precise control over drug release. Inorganic nanoparticles, like gold and silica nanoparticles, provide versatility in functionalization and targeted delivery, enhancing therapeutic efficacy. These systems significantly reduce systemic side effects and improve the therapeutic index of orphan drugs, the drugs that are used to treat the rare diseases. Their ability to protect drugs from degradation ensures stability and prolonged activity, making them particularly suitable for complex and chronic conditions associated with rare diseases. Overall, nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems represent a transformative approach in the treatment of rare diseases, offering precise, controlled, and safe delivery of therapeutics, thereby improving patient outcomes and quality of life.
Key words Orphan drug challenges, Liposomal doxorubicin, Antisense oligonucleotides, Small­interfering RNA delivery

1 Introduction

Rare diseases (RDs) are diseases that affect only a small percentage of the population. In the United States, the Orphan Drug Act of 1983 defines an RD as one that affects fewer than 200,000 indivi­duals [ specifically to treat these rare diseases, which often lack financial incentives for pharmaceutical companies due to the limited patient population. In Europe, a disease is considered rare if it affects no more than 1 in 2000 people [ definitions, often reflecting the population size and healthcare policy structures [3]. While each RD affects a limited number of individuals, collectively, they affect approximately 300 million peo­ple worldwide [4]. Over 7000 RDs have been identified, with
1]. Orphan drugs are medications or treatments developed
2]. Japan and Australia have similar
407
408 Anil Kumar et al.
Table 1 Rare diseases, number of global patients, and the cost of treatment
Est. global
Rare disease Orphan drug
patients
Cost (estimated yearly)
Cystic fibrosis Kalydeco/
Ivacaftor
Duchenne muscular dystrophy Exondys
51/Etplirsen
Gaucher disease Zavesca/
Miglustat
Pompe disease Myozyme 10,000+ ~$800,000 (very high)
Hunter syndrome Elaprase/
Idursulfase
Niemann-pick disease type C Zavesca/
Miglustat
Mucopolysaccharidosis type I
(Hurler syndrome)
Spinal muscular atrophy type
1
Aldurazyme/
Laronidase
Spinraza/
Nusinersen
70,000+ ~$300,000
300,000+ ~$700,000 (high variation)
60,000+ ~$200,000 (variable)
1000+ ~$400,000 (extremely
high)
1200+ ~$400,000 (prohibitively
expensive)
1 in 100,000
births
10,000+ ~$750,000 (highest
~$500,000 (extremely
high)
for any
drug)
about 80% having genetic origins [4]. The prevalence of RDs varies widely; some conditions may affect only a handful of individuals globally, while others, like cystic fibrosis or Duchenne muscular dystrophy, have higher incidence rates but still meet the rare disease criteria [
5].
The small number of patients poses a potential lack of market incentives, making it difficult for pharmaceutical companies to recoup their investments (Table 1) [6, 7]. The rarity of Fabry disease, affecting 1 in 40,000 to 1 in 60,000 males, underscores the economic challenges in developing new therapies (Table 1) [8–
10]. The high cost of research and development, coupled with the
necessity for extensive clinical trials, exacerbates the financial bur­den on these companies, making the return on investment uncer-
6, 11–13]. T
tain [
he development of orphan drugs is incentivized by various regulatory frameworks, such as the Orphan Drug Act in the United States, which provides benefits including tax credits, grant funding, and market exclusivity for a certain period [
14]. Sim-
ilar incentives exist in the European Union and other regions to encourage phar maceutical companies to invest in the research and development of treatments for rare diseases and orphan drugs [
Various
drugs (Table
drug delivery systems have been developed to deliver
2). A promising approach is the use of viral vectors in
gene therapy, which introduces functional genes to correct genetic
15].