Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5398_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
15 Мб
Скачать
☆
Biomaterials in Drug Delivery: Design and Applications 169
diseased tissues and cells [28]. In this approach, ligands that bind to surface molecules or receptors overexpressed in diseased cells and tissues are selected for and conjugated to delivery materials
38]. Materials designed for controlled release should ideally also
[ protect drugs from rapid clearance and/or degradation within the body.
Developing such biomaterials for controlled release is challeng­ing and requires a multidisciplinary approach, incorporating engi­neers, physical scientists, biologists, and clinicians [
Design parameters include:
1. The incorporation of adequate drug within the host material for prolonged release profiles that are required to achieve ther­apeutic efficacy
2. Protection of therapeutics from breakdown in vivo while also maintaining biological activity
3. Predictable release over the course of the therapeutic regimen, ranging from days to years.
Additionally, the materials themselves and their degradation
products should be nontoxic and biocompatible within the body, avoiding patient discomfort prior to and following administration. The expense of a particular material-drug formulation, due to the cost of material synthesis and/or fabrication, must also be taken into account during the design phase.
39].

10 Biomaterials for Controlled Release of Small Molecules

Initial studies describing the incorporation of bioactive molecules into solid polymeric materials for achieving a sustained release profile were conducted in the 1950s and 1960s for agricultural applications [ trolled drug release systems for medical applications were pioneered in the 1960–70 s [40]. The first reported biomaterial for controlled molecule release was silicon rubber when it was observed that hydrophobic, lipophilic, small-molecule (molecular weight <300 g/mol) dyes diffused through the wall of silicon tubing
Given that medical-grade silicones are biocompatible and
41].
[ used for implantation for a range of medical applications, this discovery led to the use of silicone rubbers for the controlled release of drugs, including atropine, histamine, anesthetics, steroids, and antimalarial and antischistosomal agents [42–44]. Notably, implanted silicone rubber released drugs over the course of days to months in dogs, rats, and sheep [ biomaterials induce controlled release of biologically active agents in the body. These reports suggested that modulating pharmaco­logical actions by controlling drug release from biomaterials could
35]. Soon thereafter, polymeric biomaterials as con-
42, 43, 45], demonstrating that
170 Naveen Kumar
be achieved, ultimately leading to the formation of ALZA in 1968 for the commercialization of some technologies [ further led to the development of an early drug delivery system approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1990, Norplant (now Jadelle), a contraceptive composed of silicone rubber tubes implanted in the forearm that releases levonorgestrel for up to 5 years with pregnancy rates of less than 1% per year
46]. Research within the field of biomaterials, drug delivery, and
[ controlled release accelerated during this period, giving rise to the development of osmotic pumps for oral drug delivery in dogs [ dr
ug-loaded meric and albumin microsphere-based encapsulation for sustained release of drugs in rats, rabbits, and humans [49], as well as new mathematical models to quantify drug release from biomaterials [
50]. Hydrogels, 3D networks of polymer chains cross-linked to
form matrices with high water content, are now widely used in drug delivery and tissue engineering due to their tunable physical, chem­ical, and biological properties [ demonstrate application [
52]. In drug delivery, PEG has been utilized as a “stealth material”
that enhances the circulation half-life of drugs, reduces drug accu­mulation in clearance organs such as the liver, while also enhancing the sur face biocompatability of materials [ sive overviews on hydrogels [ biomaterials for drug delivery and controlled release, are detailed elsewhere [
hydrogels for ophthalmic drug delivery [
51]. Broadly speaking, hydrogels
in areas such as regenerative medicine
53]. More comprehen-
51, 54], as well as the history of
55].
41]. This work
47]
48], poly-
,

11 Bioresponsive Polymers: From Design to Implementation

An ideal therapeutic drug is expected to treat or cure a disease without resulting in any side effects [ not been achieved so far. Many chemotherapeutics are found to destroy both cancerous and healthy cells within the vicinity of the target site [ drug directly to diseased cell populations. Polymers have been found to permit the creation of “responsive” materials within the host environment and can be formulated with drugs to control release [ the molecular weight of polymers that can be controlled via mono­mer stoichiometry using controlled polymerization strategies like atom transfer radical polymerization, reversible addition fragmen­tation chain transfer, nitroxide-mediated polymerization, and living ring-opening metathesis polymerization. A bioresponsive material is one that can respond to a specific “trigger” inside or outside of the body. Because the body have unique pathological parameters such as pH gradients, temperatures, enzymes, and small molecules, the creation of materials that will respond to physiological
57]. An efficient chemotherapeutics would administer
58].
This polymer attribute is due to tuning propensity of
56]. However, this goal has
Biomaterials in Drug Delivery: Design and Applications 171
alterations in both space and time is required. Triggers include chemical, biological, and physical stimuli. The chemical and biological ones are intrinsic to the body, while the physical stimuli are extrinsic to the body and can thus be used to quicken sole drug delivery [
59].
11.1 Redox­Sensitive Polymers
The human body consists of compartmentalized regions of differ­ing redox potential. The reducing agent glutathione, for example, is found at a concentration two to three orders of magnitude larger within cells than outside of them. Bio-responsive materials are initiated by redox potential difference in tissue environment and its surrounding [
60]. Contrastingly, oxidizing agents that include
hydrogen peroxide are associated with tissue inflammation and injury [61]. These differences in redox potential between a local tissue/cellular environment and their surroundings present an opportunity to create bioresponsive materials that are triggered via oxidation or reduction within the body. In order to respond to reduction triggers within the body, materials derived from dis­ulfides are commonly employed [
60]. Disulfide-based materials are
frequently used as bioresponsive materials because disulfide bridges can be reduced under mild conditions to afford dithiol analogues. Within the cell, this process is most commonly mediated by gluta­thione, a tripeptide consisting of glycine, cysteine, and glutamic acid. To date, dilsufide-based materials have been exploited for applications ranging from protein delivery to gene expression, among others [
62]. Importantly, disulfide/dithiol interchange is a
reversible chemical reaction which can be important for biomedical applications. Interestingly, many sulfur-based materials have also been developed to respond to oxidation triggers. Sulfur is a unique atom in that it can exist in multiple oxidation states; accordingly, sulfur-based materials including block copolymers have been prepared for applications in areas such as gene delivery [
63]. Alter-
natively, materials derived from boronic acids/esters have also been developed to respond to oxidation triggers [64].
In the presence of oxidizing agents such as hydrogen peroxide, boronic acids/esters can be converted into the corresponding alcohol. This chemical process has been exploited for triggered protein release applications using dextran as a base material, among others. There are materials that can respond to both oxidation and reduction triggers, which are incorporated into responsive polymers. One of the most com­mon functional group motifs used for these dual activation materi­als are diselenides. Diselenides are similar in chemical structure to disulfides and have also been incorporated into responsive poly­mers. Unlike disulfide materials, however, diselenides are sensitive to both oxidation and reduction, which allows for alternative trig­gers within nanobiotechnology application [
65].
172 Naveen Kumar
11.2 pH-­Responsive Polymers
The constituents of the human body such as tissues, fluids, and organelles have varied pH values. Areas like stomach, vagina, and lysosomes display acidic pH (<7.0), ocular surfaces (7.1), blood (7.4), and bile (7.8) [
58]. Owing to these varied pH of systems and
organs in the body, improvement in the efficacy and precision of therapeutic molecules will necessitate the design of polymeric drug delivery systems that are pH specific. pH-responsive materials have been useful in nucleic acid delivery, doxorubicin delivery, and taste masking [
66]. The target treatment of tumors has been enhanced
using the pH-responsive materials. Such known target delivery includes multifunctional acid-sensitive nanocomposites for antican­cer drugs and acid-responsive poly ethylene glycol derivatives for the controlled release of therapeutics in tumor target treatment
67]. As a general strategy to create pH-sensitive materials, it is
[ common to incorporate chemical functional groups that can be protonated or deprotonated within polymeric matrices [68]. For example, amine-containing polymers including those derived from dimethylaminoethylmethacrylate are protonated under acidic con­ditions to yield reversibly cationic materials [
69]. By contrast,
carboxylate-containing polymers including poly(acrylic acid) are deprotonated under basic conditions to afford anionic matrices. Given that the charge of these polymers can be readily altered, materials derived from these polymers can respond to pH changes by swelling, degrading, shrinking, or dissociating. In doing so, these materials can release their drug cargo in a pH-responsive fashion within target tissues and organs in the body. To date, pH-responsive materials have been used for a variety of applications including nucleic acid delivery, doxorubicin delivery, and taste masking, among others [
One specific area
66].
where pH-responsive materials have improved therapeutic targeting is in the treatment of tumors. The tumor microenvironment often exists at a lower pH (≈5.7) than its sur­roundings (≈6.8–7) due to localized acidosis [
70]. Given this
difference, multifunctional acid-sensitive nano-composites have been explored for the controlled release of anticancer drugs
71]. Importantly, these materials were also functionalized with
[ folic acid, improving the targeting of these materials to overex­pressed folic acid receptors on the cancer cell surface. Moreover, a similar concept has been employed for materials incorporating acid­sensitive diaminoketal cross links, and drug-laden versions of these materials have demonstrated increased cellular uptake relative to that observed for the free drug alone [
Finally, acid-responsive
72].
poly(ethylene glycol) derivatives have also been designed for the controlled release of therapeutics using hydra-zine chemistry, and tumor targeting with pH-responsive materials continues to be an area of interest to the drug delivery community [
67].
Biomaterials in Drug Delivery: Design and Applications 173

11.3 Hydrolysis and Enzymatically Responsive Polymers

Hydrolysis-sensitive polymeric materials have also been designed, synthesized, and implemented in vivo for drug delivery purposes. Hydrolysis-prone materials by definition can be degraded by water, a trigger that is ubiquitous in the human body. This degradative process most commonly occurs through the nucleophilic addition of water into an electrophilic functional group on a polymer. Com­monly employed electrophilic functional groups on polymers include esters and anhydrides, each of which have been employed in multiple types of responsive materials [
73]. The Gliadel wafer is
one example product on the market that demonstrates the power of hydrolysis-sensitive materials for drug delivery [
74]. Consisting of
the chemotherapeutic Carmustine impregnated within a polyanhy­dride material, the Gliadel wafer can be implanted into brain tumors for the controlled release of chemotherapeutic to malignant gliomas. Of note, the Gliadel wafer improves the 6-month survival rate of patients diagnosed with glioblastoma multiforme [
74]. Enzyme-responsive polymers have also been developed for
drug delivery. The concentrations of specific enzymes including matrix metalloproteins, hyaluronidases, phospholipases, and prostate-specific antigen can deviate from normal values in associa­tion with specific disease pathologies. Accordingly, many enzyme­responsive polymer systems have been developed, with applications ranging from tumor imaging, to doxorubicin delivery, and mini­mizing inflammation in the colon, among others [
75].
11.4 Temperature­Responsive Polymers
11.5 Magnetic­Responsive Polymers
Another drug delivery vehicle is the temperature-sensitive polymer that can operate at both human body temperature of 37 °C and at ambient temperature such as 25 °C. To take advantage of this difference, polymer systems that flow at room temperature but become gel at body temperature have been developed—these mate­rials are predominantly used for local delivery applications, capita­lizing on the sol-gel transition of specific polymers [
76]. These
polymers include poloxamers, poly(N-alkyl acryl amides), poly (N-vinyl caprolactams), cellulose, xyloglucan, and chitosan. These thermo-responsive polymers can be modified via varying the ratio of monomers, endgroup modifications, and post-polymerization modifications to make them suitable for varying applications [
77].
Magnetic-responsive polymers are therapeutic drug-loaded poly­mers that work under the influence of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to deliver its drug to the target. Magnetic pulsing techni­ques serve as yet another “trigger” for controlling the release of drugs from responsive materials. This concept has been extended to designing systems to release compounds to specific organs by pair­ing therapeutic treatment with drug-loaded polymers and magnetic
Select examples include
resonance imaging (MRI) techniques [
78].
(i) the systematic release of dopamine from alginates impregnated with magnetic beads; (ii) targeted plasmid delivery to the lung
174 Naveen Kumar
using chitosan nanopar ticles; and (iii) insulin delivery, among others [ pH-responsive materials
79]. Magnetic “triggers” have also been combined with
to afford dual responsive drug delivery systems. The combination of two or more environmental responses in a single material can be highly advantageous. For example, if one were to include magnetic particles within a polymer that was designed to degrade in highly acidic conditions, then one could use MRI imaging to pinpoint the exact location that the drug was delivered upon dispersion of the pa stomach. An
added benefit to incorporating magnetic material
rticles within, for instance, the
within a delivery nanoparticle is that it can double as a retrieval method. When designing any material or drug that will be implanted in a patient, it is important to establish a contingency plan. In case of an undesired immune response or rejection, for both molecular chemicals and living tissue alike, being able to remove the injected or implanted material is crucial. Having a magnetic system allows for the material to be more easily removed, especially in
a self-circulating system (e.g., the blood stream or intraperitoneal spaces). Accounting for these factors into a drug– polymer design broadens the project scope and challenges interdis­ciplinary research in order to achieve a unified engineered material. It is also important to note that some magnetic responsive systems have been approved by the FDA [
80].
11.6 Light­Responsive Polymers
Light-responsive polymers are used as external drug delivery sys­tems that use noninvasive and painless techniques as drugs are delivered by light UV- and visible-wavelength irradiation stimula­tion. The ease by which drugs can be delivered by light stimulation has been a major motivation for the design of systems to respond to this style of noninvasive trigger. Light stimulation drug delivery has been desirable due to the controlled spatial and temporal release of a therapeutic payload with both UV- and visible-wavelength irradi­ation. This technique provides a remote-activated approach that does not require direct patient contact [
Current challenges
81].
associated with light-activated controlled drug release include the distance of the polymer vehicle from the light source, the density of native host tissue that the light has to penetrate to reach the delivery vehicle, and the potential for drug molecule degradation upon exposure to light. One underlying mechanism of light­induced drug delivery involves a shift in molecular conformation including cis-trans isomerization and ring-opening reactions
82].
This technology has been used to target melanoma cells
[ through the release of drugs from a light-responsive azobenzene­modified amphiphilic block copolymer [
83]. Upon irradiation, the
conformation of the azobenzene switches, thereby altering the self­assembling structures and releasing the payload.
Biomaterials in Drug Delivery: Design and Applications 175

11.7 Swelling and Contracting Polymers

There are polymers that can swell or shrink in response to external stimuli. Changes in porosity can result from leaching of ionic cross­linking molecules, which in turn alters the diffusion pathways for sensing molecules [ changes in porosity occasioned as ionic cross-linking molecules are leached, resulting in alteration of the diffusion pathways for sensing molecules. Alginate, a commonly employed polymer that is isolated from seaweed, is relatively biocompatible. Tuning the spatial and temporal release of encapsulated materials is rather challenging, but has been successfully applied for a variety of applications using alginates. A recent example includes the sustained delivery of vas­cular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and subsequent analogues from alginate to a localized region within the body. Using an injectable alginate design, the controlled release of VEGF was utilized to promote lymphatic vessel development through improved vascularization [ have the potential to create future generations of materials for the paralleled delivery of therapeutics, regional specific sensing, and secondary responses for noninvasive detection.

12 Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems

Conventional (“free”) drugs exhibit limitations that can be improved through their incorporation in drug delivery system. The chemical nature of the drug molecule can be responsible for its poor solubility resulting in drug precipitation when in aqueous media. The use of drug carriers such as lipid micelles or liposomes, among others, can surpass this major limitation improving drug solubility (Lukyanov and Torchilin 2004). Although many efforts have been developed to promote topic/transderm al drug delivery, the systemic route is still the major strategy used for drug adminis­tration. A drug administered by this method reaches the systemic circulation (blood) inducing, therefore, a systemic action. On the other hand, drugs given by the topical route are mainly applied on skin or mucous membrane, being able to promote both of systemic and localized action.
84]. This phenomenon can have stemmed from
85]. In general, these hybrid designs

12.1 Barriers to Transdermal Delivery

Skin is a highly efficient barrier that limits molecular transport both from and into the body, preventing molecular permeation. This natural barrier avoids the penetration of foreign molecules such as the flux of toxins, while minimizing the water loss. Skin is com­posed by multi-layers. On skin’s outer surface, there is a non-living layer of keratin-filled cells surrounded by a lipid-rich extracellular matrix named stratum corneum (SC), an extremely thin biomembrane
.
176 Naveen Kumar

12.2 Development of Transdermal Drug Delivery Patches

12.3 Hydrogels Versus Non-hydrogel Polymeric Patches

12.4 Patches Based on Biopolymers

12.5 Patches Based on Synthetic Polymers

Transdermal delivery systems can be divided into three generations of development. As stated in European Pharmacopoeia, transder­mal patches are designed to provide the controlled and sustained release of active substances to the systemic circulation after crossing the skin barrier, mostly by diffusion and resulting in a prolonged and adequately constant absorption rate. The majority of the actual patches are within the first generation.
Matrix- and reservoir-type patches can be divided into hydrogel and non-hydrogel polymeric patches. Hydrogel is a water-swollen and cross-linked polymeric network produced by the simple reaction of one or more monomers. Hydrogels have received high attention in the past 50 years, due to their exceptional promise in wide range of biomedical applications [
48].
Biopolymers, mostly natural ones, have been receiving careful attention due to their biocompatibility, being editable, low toxicity, and susceptibility to degradation by human enzymes or by hydro­lysis, as well as renewable and sustainable giving rise to a broader use especially in fields such as biomedical sciences, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and other related fields.
The commercially available patches are based on synthetic materials that display greater mechanical resistance and non-degradation over time. These materials can be widely used in different patches design such as drug-in adhesive (DIA) and microneedles patches. The DIA patches consist in the incorporation of a drug and possible additives in pressure sensitive adhesives (PSA) that is limited by a backing film and release liner.

12.6 Drug Particles/ Carriers

12.7 Commercial Patches

Drug release is greatly conditioned by the physical and chemical properties of the drug. Carrier systems ranging from micro- to nanoscale are able to transport a wide variety of therapeutic mole­cules with enhanced solubility and targeting. Such systems can be incorporated during patch production in order improve drug release, enhancing its permeation through skin layers. Nanovesi­cles, for instance, allow the delivery of the entrapped molecules into or across the skin.
New and desired products are commercialized to fulfil the unmet medical needs at a reasonable cost. Approximately two dozen molecules have been approved for transdermal administration by the regulatory authorities to reach the market. Most of these drugs are for prescription use only, with many being available as generic patches following patent expirations.
The development
of new and effective DDS has been greatly improving treatments efficacy, solving the common problems asso­ciated with the use of conventional “free” drugs. Their

13 Smart Biomaterials

Biomaterials in Drug Delivery: Design and Applications 177
administration through transdermal route has been attracting con­siderable attention due to its numerous advantages, such as less frequent, painless, and flexible dosing, as it also generates less amount of dangerous waste. These factors have been stimulating the research and development of transdermal DDS to be effective.
Another class of innovative biomaterials that are pushing forward pioneering medical approaches are the ones taking the name of smart biomaterials, due to their ability to respond to changes in physiological parameters or external stimuli [ materials are able to modify their physicochemical and mechanical properties as a reaction to biological, chemical, and physical signals, i.e., temperature, humidity, pH, redox potential, enzymatic activity, light, and mechanical stimuli. Among these biomaterials, smart hydrogels are frequently exploited for tissue engineering and drug delivery applications [ be cross-linked also using reversible methods, such as physical cross-linking, thermally induced entanglement, and self-assembly, which may allow for controlling drug release and biodegradation
92, 93]. Biodegradable hydrogels are often obtained by means
rate [ of cleavable cross-linkers, which can be dissolved through hydroly­sis, proteolysis, or disentanglement following a specific stimulus
94]. Other biomaterials such as shape memory (SM) alloys and
[ polymers own the unique ability to recover to their original geom­etry and structure after exposure to an external stimulus, such as temperature, magnetic field, electric field, light, or relative humidity [
smart materials that have attracted attention as actuators for the development of artificial muscles. These polymers present some similarities with the functional response of biological muscles in terms of resilience, resistance, and large actuation stretching or bending [ have also been adopted in bioinspired robotics to simulate specific actuation and sensing properties, such as, by way of example, the tactile features of human skin or the ability of some animals to sense subtle vibrations in the environment [ applications of biomaterials to regenerative medicine is represented by their use as systems to release extracellular vesicles (EVs) and soluble factors [ tent progenitor cells that are able to self-renew, differentiate into multiple lineages, and also accomplish trophic effects [100]. These effects are due to the secretion of EVs, which transport a variety of intracellular molecules (lipids, proteins, RNA, and DNA) suitable for guiding the regenerative process during tissue repair. These
95].
Electroactive polymers
96, 97]. Nanomaterials and nanostructured biomaterials
89–91]. I
99]. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are pluripo-
ndeed, the hydrogel structure can
(EAPs) are another emerging class of
98].
86–88]. These bio-
One of the most recent
178 Naveen Kumar
molecules control different cellular functions (e.g., migration, pro­liferation, differentiation, and synthesis of extracellular matrix com­ponents); furthermore, they suppress the local immune system, inhibit fibrosis and apoptosis, enhance angiogenesis, and stimulate mitosis and differentiation of reparative cells.

14 Conclusion and Future Perspective

Significant progress has been made in improving the biomaterial­based drug delivery systems. However, only a limited number of affinity-based delivery systems have been developed for the delivery of neurotrophic factors. Therefore, there is a need for the develop­ment of broad-spectrum reservoir-based delivery systems, includ­ing microspheres, electrospun nanofibers, hydrogels, and combinations of these systems. Drug delivery systems transport biologically active agents, such as growth factors and genetic mate­rial, into the desired location to promote beneficial effects for the treatment of diseases and disorders, osmotic pumps for the delivery of neurotrophic factors to target site, affinity-based delivery systems (ABDS) in which drug loading and controlled release are achieved through the interactions of therapeutic drug and the delivery sys­tem, and reservoir-based delivery systems, where a polymer struc­ture encapsulates the drug while its release is controlled via the material properties.
Skin p
rovides a l application and absorption of a patch-like device to its surface, constituting a noninvasive procedure that will promote a continu­ous intervention. Transdermal DDS have been exploited as a suc­cessful controlled drug release platform that have received regulatory approval for a series of products. Transdermal DDS can be applied when a drug has a significant first-pass effect in the liver, being prematurely metabolized. Such type of drug delivery also allows for less frequent dosing or steady delivery profiles and may be easily applied with a painless application. Moreover, trans­dermal DDS promote a fast absorption of drug in superficial tissues, improving the wound healing process. The choice among these patches can mostly depend on the drug properties (e.g., molecular weight and physicochemical characteristics), as well as the required amount and release rate to accomplish an effective treatment. Drug carriers (either at nano- or micro-scale) can be incorporated in patches in order to improve drug pharmacological properties, prompting a more efficient treatment of such devices.
Significant progress of hydrogels used for drug delivery and expanding the range of drugs and kinetics which can be achieved using a hydrogel-based delivery vehicle. However, several challenges remain to improve the clinical applicability of hydrogels for drug delivery. One set of major
arge and readily accessible surface area for
has been made in improving the properties