Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5398_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
15 Мб
Скачать
☆
Chapter 8
Biomaterials in Drug Deliver y: Design and Applications
Naveen Kumar
Abstract
Biomaterials have become integral to the fast-evolving fields of pharmaceuticals and medicine, playing a vital role in diagnostics and therapeutics. Originally used in medical devices for tissue replacement or organ support, their applications have expanded beyond mere implantation. Biomaterials, which can be natural or synthetic, are designed to interact with biological systems, supporting or replacing damaged tissues while being compatible with human biology. Over time, advancements in material science have led to significant innovations in their use, par ticularly in drug delivery systems. Biomaterials now enhance the effectiveness of therapeutic agents like antibodies, peptides, and vaccines, and are applied in tissue engineering, prostheses, and dental implants. Recent research has focused on biomaterials as nanocarr iers for controlled drug delivery, minimizing drug degradation and toxicity while optimizing therapeutic outcomes. As biocompat­ibility remains a crucial factor, new developments in biomaterials offer promising solutions for enhancing drug delivery, wound healing, and overall patient care.
Key words Biomaterials, Drug delivery, Biocompatibility, Tissue engineering, Therapeutic agents

1 Introduction

From the last few decades, biomaterials have marked its presence in the fast-advancing phar maceutical and medical fields. Biomaterials are those materials which are intended to interact with biological living tissue and used for therapeutic and diagnostic purpose. Ear­lier these materials were only used in medical devices to treat or to replace any tissue or improve the functions of organ. But later it was found that the term non-viable given to them is inappropriate as biomaterials have its application more than just as implanted devices. Biomaterials are a major part of our routine practice in the diagnosis as well as for the treatment of several human diseases. Biomaterials are basically, any materials (natural or synthetic) that are biologically compatible with the human body and is used to support, enhance, restore, or replace the biological function of damaged tissues and is continuously in contact with the body fluids. The use of the word “biomaterials” had been largely anticipated by
159
160 Naveen Kumar
the practical use of materials as biomaterials. Indeed, the presence of exogenous materials in the human body can be dated back to prehistory. In South Africa and India, the heads of large, biting ants were exploited to clamp wound edges together [ centuries, other metals have been exploited: lead and silver among others, with and without evidence of adverse reactions. Moreover, 4000 years ago, the Chinese carved bamboo sticks in the form of natural teeth to be inserted into jaws just like current dental implants. Egyptians used precious metals for dental implants [
Additionally, the purpose to replace diseased/damaged parts of the human body has been pursued for centuries. During the six­teenth centur y, Gaspare Tagliacozzi and other pioneering plastic surgeons successfully used autogenous skin flaps to replace missing noses [ formed without any awareness of the problems and limitations related to material science and biological phenomena; moreover, no knowledge of sterilization, immunological reaction, inflamma­tion, and biodegradation was available at those times [ their “unconscious” success clearly demonstrates that the human body has an impressive ability to adapt itself and accommodate foreign materials. This allowed for traveling on the road to bioma­terials evolution before taking into account the fundamental inter­actions between the body and the implanted materials; the systematic examination thereof only began about 150 years ago, when scientists and physicians started to scientifically evaluate how the body reacts to the presence of exogenous materials. The practi­cal exploitation of materials as biomaterials then began to face the issue of biocompatibility.
3]. All these original surgical procedures had been per-
1]. Over the
2].
1]. However,
2 Evolving Definitions of Biomaterials
As was described in the previous paragraph, biomaterials are char­acterized by a wide range of chemical compositions and properties, and they can be exploited in very many applications. Therefore, it is quite difficult to define them unambiguously. Marin et al. [ ascribed to Jonathan Cohen one of the earliest definitions of bio­materials, which dates back to 1967. Dr. Cohen was an orthopedic surgeon and exogenous materials had been used in orthopedic surgery for many years. He simply defined “biomaterials” as all materials that are used as implants, with the exception of drugs and soft biological tissues [ the practical use of biomaterials in surgery focusing on “hard” materials that are typically applied in orthopedics.
In April established and organized its inaugural annual symposium at Clem­son University (SC, USA) [ of biomaterial was coined: “A biomaterial is a systematically,
1974, the Society for Biomaterials (SFB) was formally
4]
5]. Indeed, this definition comes from
6]. In this symposium, a new definition
Biomaterials in Drug Delivery: Design and Applications 161
pharmacologically inert substance designed for implantation within or incorporation with a living system” [ formulated in 1982 during the “National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement on the Clinical Applications of Biomaterials” (Bethesda, MD, USA): biomaterial is “A substance (other than a drug) or combination of substances, synthetic or natural in origin, which can be used for any period of time, as a whole or as a part of a system which treats, augments, or replaces any tissue, organ, or function of the body” [ ence from a drug materials of “natural” origin and specifies what biomaterials are intended for: they are part of a system that is conceived not only to replace but also to potentially treat and augment each tissue, each organ, and each function of the body.
As an immediate consequence, possible applications increase as much as the availability of biomaterials increases. In this aspect, the definition given by Prof. D. F. Williams “A biomaterial is a non-viable material used in a medical device, intended to interact with biological systems” seems to be more appropriate [ the current use of biological tissues from human cadavers (tissue banks) and from animals (after chemical treatments), tissue engi­neering techniques appear as extremely promising approaches to create viable tissues (and organs) by combining cells, scaffolds (biomaterials!), and biochemical signals. During the European Society for Biomaterials 9th European Conference (Chester, UK) in 1991, the definition, approved in 1982, was improved including “in order to maintain or improve the quality of life of the individ­ual” [
10]. It clearly affirms that the aim of any biomaterial is not
only the “survival” of the patient but also the maintenance/ improvement of their quality of life.
is maintained, but now the definition includes
7]. A broader definition was
8]. The differ-
9]. Besides

3 Basic Features Required for the Biomaterial

Since the biomaterials are in direct contact with the body tissues and body fluid, there are some basic features required for the biomaterial such as biocompatibility, inertness, safety, stability, cost effectiveness, and ease of fabrication as shown in Fig.

4 Characteristics of Biomaterials

The requirement of designing and selection criteria of biomaterial depends upon the type of medical application. The biomaterial must have some unique characteristics that can have potent appli­cation in biomedical field for longer duration without immune rejection (Fig. [
11, 12].
1). Some of these characteristics are described here
1.
162 Naveen Kumar
Fig. 1 Diagrammatic demonstration of substance design requirements of biomaterials
1. Outstanding biocompatibility
2. Sufficient mechanical properties
3. High-quality physical and chemical properties
4. Enough resistance to wear
5. Enough resistance to rust
6. Osseo-integration (For
5 Classification of Biomaterials
Biomaterials can be broadly classified on the basis of its source, such as natural and synthetic biomaterial which can also be further sub-classified as shown in Table 1.
bone
implants
Biomaterials in Drug Delivery: Design and Applications 163
Table 1 Classification based on occurrence of biomaterials
Biomaterials Example
Naturally extracted biomaterials
Protein-based biomaterials Collagen, fibrin, and silk
Polysaccharide-based
biomaterials
Gum-based biomaterials Pectin, xanthum gum, dextran
Biologically derived materials Porcine/bovine pericardium
Synthetically derived biomaterials
Polymer-based biomaterials Polymethylmethacrilate (PMMA), ultra-high molecular weight
Peptide-based biomaterials Short amino acids and self-assembling peptides
Ceramic-based biomaterials Bioactive glass, alumina, zirconia, hydroxyapatite, beta tricalcium
Metal-based biomaterials Stainless steel, CoCrMo, titanium, Ti6Al4V, nitinol, nickel, platinum,
Biocomposites or composites
biomaterials
Chitosan (CS), alginate, and hyaluronan
polyethylene (UHMWPE), polylactic acid (PLA), polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), nylon, polyethylene, polyurethane, celluloid, cellophane, polycaprolactone (PCL), polyglycolic acid (PGA), polylactic acid (PLA), poly-lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA), poly (ethers) including polyethylene glycol (PEG), polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), and polyurethanes (PUs)
phosphate, pyrolytic carbon
tantalum
Polysaccharides,
proteins, sugars,
lignins, synthetic polymers

6 Biocompatibility as the Crucial Item

Biocompatibility assessment is a complex procedure aimed at ver­ifying the capacity of a given material to avoid adverse reactions and also to correctly perform the intended function when in contact with (or inserted into) the biological environment. The ISO 10993-1 establishes criteria for the biological evaluation of medical devices, again confirming that biological tests have to be “per­formed on the final medical device, or representative samples from the final device or materials processed in the same manner as the final medical device (including sterilization, if needed)”
Thus, the term “biocompatibility” has to include not only
13].
[ what is commonly meant as “biological compatibility” but also a functional evaluation of the entire implantable system. For sure, several aspects determine the biocompatibility of a given material also considering the duration of the contact with the biological
164 Naveen Kumar
counterparts: chemical composition, mechanical behavior, and also physical shape.

7 Biomaterials in Drug Delivery

The expeditious development of science and technology has led the application of biomaterials in different fields of biology, physics, chemistry, tissue engineering, as well as medicine [ last 50 years, biomaterials have been researched and used in phar­maceutical drug delivery and found to enhance the delivery and effectiveness of many therapeutic agents along with antibodies, peptides, vaccines, and enzymes [ tant role in diverse fields like medicines, food manufacturing units, pharmaceutical companies, fashion designing, and other household appliances. In the area of medical sciences, biomaterials are signifi­cantly applied in dental fixture fabrication, implants, prosthesis, and tissue scaffolds. In pharmaceutical sector, in addition to the pro­duction of tablets and capsules, these biomaterials are employed in the designing of customized implants for drug delivery [
Biomaterials have for nanocarriers which have good biocompatibility, good biode­gradability, high drug-loading capacity, and pH-responsive drug release ability, and, therefore, are used for the drug delivery
18]. The well-designed drug delivery systems by synthetic biomin-
[ eral nanocarriers can help prevent the prior leakage of drug and protect the drug from inactivation during the circulation. Biomineral-based nanocarriers are used for the delivery of chemo­therapeutic drugs, genes, and proteins [ terials are used for drug delivery because of their great potential and structural features that are same to extracellular matrix. Different natural as well as polymeric materials can be used to make nanofi­brous biomaterials [ depends on the state of neural cells and also on various extracellular components which arranges the cellular behavior into proper tissue functions. Biomaterials have a crucial role in regaining or increasing the role of extracellular components in CNS for the event of injury and disease. Biomaterials are also used for cell transplantation as well as for the delivery of proteins or drug [ derived from extracellular matrix are emerging as origin of bioma­terials for engineering, which are able to induce desired cell-specific response. Use of various biomaterials that are derived from natu­rally available extracellular matrix proteins for regulating the cell function has been reported [ patches from polyacrylate as a biomaterial for the transdermal drug delivery through the high internal phase emulsion technique for the wound healing. Kim et al. [
14, 15]. From
16]. Biomaterials play an impor-
17].
a huge number of advantages and are used
Nanofibrous bioma-
18].
19]. The central nervous system (CNS)
20]. The components
21]. Corti et al. [22] have developed
23]
have developed atenolol
Biomaterials in Drug Delivery: Design and Applications 165
imprinted polysaccharide biomaterial by using mungbean starch and polyvinyl alcohol and evaluated them for drug release behavior.
For making effective formulation of a drug, it should be kept in mind that the active constituent is present at the target site in maximum amount inside the human body. It has been observed that in the pharma sector the drug delivery system depends on several factors like the delivery device or dosage form, and the active component at the requisite site of action. The consumption of tablets and capsules as conventional dosage is restricted by the requirement of elevated doses that coupled with higher toxicity profiles. To remove this obstacle, a novel drug therapy has been developed. In novel drug therapy, the active ingredient is modu­lated in such a way that it confers maximum advantage to the target site and side effects get minimized. Some examples based on this therapy comprises of nano-formulations, liposomes, microspheres, and osmotic drug delivery systems. These can be applied as oral administration or parenteral use. Mucoadhesive drug delivery sys­tem is another example that is based on transdermal
.
applications [
24]
The quest for controlled drug release emanating from side effects associated with the application and delivery of conventional drugs has necessitated the need for materials that can transport drugs to target site without difficulty or problem during and after delivery. Normally, drugs are delivered repeatedly on prescription to the body in measures that will bring about remediation and quick recovery to the patient during the treatment period. In this way, drug concentration levels will increase and when above the body’s tolerance level, the problems associated with over therapeu­tic concentrations could occur that could result into toxic side [
25].
It is also possible that the drug release rate is so fast that therapeutic actions are no longer effective owing to low drug concentrations at the delivery site, which may occur through drug metabolism, degradation, and transport out of the target
25]. Consequently, this phenomenon would result in drug wast-
[ age and transport medium loss with high-risk offside effects on surrounding body cells, tissues, and organs. The solution to these problems is to have drug carriers that can provide controlled release rate to the target and would allow for complete therapeutic reha­bilitation before degradation and transport of excess concentration
The drug and its carrier in form
of drug and carrier medium [
26].
of capsules are orally administered and may be formulated for parenteral administration [
16]. The drug release rate of the capsule
can be controlled via the use of cellulose coatings exhibiting slow dissolution, incorporation of drug-complexing elements or com­pounds which hinder fast dissolution of drug, use of compressed tablets, and the inclusion of emulsion and suspensions. Materials that can permit drug release without changing or decaying over time with longer therapeutic windows (days to years) are required.
166 Naveen Kumar
These carries are such that they can be injected and/or implanted directly to target diseased tissues/cells for enhancing delivery effi­ciency [ ligands deposited on biomaterial surfaces to allow for a set reten­tion and usage by infirm tissues and cells have been employed
28]. The design of biomaterials for drug carriers aside permitting
[ surface modification using ligands should also shield drugs from speedy break down and/or degeneracy within the target site.

8 Controlled Drug Delivery

With the emergence of genetic engineering in the 1970s, large­scale production of proteins and other complex macromolecules became a reality. Similar to small-molecule delivery, controlled release of proteins and other macromolecules (i.e., insulin, heparin, enzymes) required the development of new biomaterials or new biomaterial designs. Synthetic materials were required that could ensure the delivery of proteins and macromolecules in unaltered forms to preserve their biological function, while simultaneously providing protection from degradation in vivo. Furthermore, it was largely thought within the controlled release community that pro­teins and other macromolecules could not be encapsulated and released at controlled rates from polymers. Polymers are large molecules formed from simple monomers and may be synthetic or biopolymers that are the constituents of living organisms like proteins, nucleic acids, and sugars.
Biopolymers are biochemical and biophysical functions of living cells, and thus can participate in cooperative interactions, resulting in nonlinear response to external stimuli. The cooperative interaction mecha­nism of biopolymers is utilized in producing synthetic polymers that are similar in behavior to biopolymers, which are used as biomaterials with ability to interface with biological systems for a variety of living cells functions. Polymeric, biodegradable materials are often useful in biomedical applications, as the polymers degrade into normal metabolites of the body or eliminated from the body with or without further metabolic transformation [ oped polymeric biomaterials have physical and chemical properties that are maintained and are not tampered with during synthesis. The use of synthetic polymeric biomaterials includes artificial cor­neal substitute, blood contacting devices, hip joint replacements, and formation of intraocular lenses [ mers are either natural or synthetic. Natural polymers are derived from natural resources and have potential to be considered for biomedical and pharmaceutical applications owing to biocompati­bility, biomimicking environments, unique mechanical properties, and biodegradability. Natural polymers are prone to viral infection,
27]. To achieve target drug delivery, the use of affinity
active in controlling and regulating many
29, 30].
31, 32]. Biodegradable poly-
Devel-
Biomaterials in Drug Delivery: Design and Applications 167
antigenicity, and unstable material supply, which limit biomedical application. On the other hand, synthetic polymers are flexible in synthesis procedure technique with excellent reproducibility which made them useful for surgical and short-term medical application, orthopedic applications that may slowly transfer the load as it degrades [ an oral or increase concentration and performance. But this may reach an extreme level before it declines rapidly, especially when the elimina­tion rate from the body is high. A too low or too high drug concentration in the body will not benefit the patient because of the side effects. This phenomenon then becomes a concern requir­ing the use of controlled drug relea offered by apeutic and bioactive insoluble biodegradable subnano, nano, micropolymer matrix cav­ity where the therapeutic agents are released in a controlled fashion. These pioneering technologies led to rapid progress in the fields of biomaterials and drug delivery, with the development of a new generation of polymers which release macromolecules in a con­trolled manner.
33
]. The drug administration into the body is either via
intravenous route with repeated administration done to
se mechanism which can only be
biomaterials [
34]. For controlled drug release, the ther-
agents are enveloped or encapsulated in an

9 Clinical Need for Controlled Drug Delivery

The need for materials for controlled drug release arose from the general problems associated with conventional dose delivery meth­ods. Generally, drug administration required frequent, repeated doses that result in high variability of circulating drug concentra­tions throughout the treatment period (Fig.
Upon administration, centrations, but in some cases, toxic side effects arise when the concentration rises above the maximum safe levels [ methods also result in rapid drug level decreases to concentrations that are no longer therapeutic, which can be a result of metabolism, degradation, and transport away from the therapeutic target
25]. Collectively, this results in both wasted drug and material,
[ and increased risk to patients due to reduced therapeutic efficacy as well as potential toxic side effects [ approaches for slowing the rate of release were developed [26]. These “sustained release” technologies contained the desired therapeutic in the form of capsules which were generally adminis­tered orally, and in some cases formulated for parenteral adminis­tration [ slowly dissolving cellulose coatings, the addition of drug-complexing substances to decrease drug solubility, the use of compressed tablets, as well as the employment of emulsion and suspensions, all housed within capsules. Sustained release
16, 35]. Drug release was dampened through the use of
2).
drug levels increase to therapeutic con-
25]. These
35]. To address these issues,
168 Naveen Kumar
Fig. 2 Schematic representation of drug plasma levels after various dosing regimens
formulations, however, still were influenced strongly by patient-to­patient variability, environmental effects, and required repeated dosages [35].
As an alternative to sustained release, the ideal controlled drug release system offers several advantages. Such delivery materials release drugs at rates that do not change with time (i.e., zero­order release), maintaining release within the therapeutic window and avoiding the inefficiencies of the drug concentration peaks and valleys of conventional formulations (Fig.
2). By avoiding “peaks
and valleys” and remaining within the therapeutic window, con­trolled release materials provide the benefit of reducing the total amount of dr ug required to achieve therapeutic efficacy. By decreas­ing the number of required doses, these materials would also improve patient adherence, which is only 50% in developed nations [
By controlling drug release over longer therapeutic windows
36].
(i.e., days to years), such materials can also be injected and/or implanted directly within a specific diseased tissue, thereby limiting off-target side effects and increasing potency. In addition to avoid­ing “peaks and valleys,” controlled release systems must enhance the targeting of drugs to specific tissues and cells within the body to avoid off target effects [
27, 37]. To enhance tissue specificity, active
targeting strategies utilizing affinity ligands on the surface of bio­materials have been employed for specific retention and uptake by