Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_2867_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
15 Мб
Скачать
☆
10 Infective Endocarditis Misdiagnosed asCommunity-Acquired Pneumonia
2. Black AD.Non-infectious mimics of community-acquired pneumonia. Pneumonia (Nathan). 2016; 8:2. Published 2016 Apr 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41479-016-0002-1.
3. Pertseva TO, Kіreєva TV, Bєlosludtseva KO. Maski tyazhkikh pnevmonіy: algoritmi dіagnostiki ta lіkuvannya. Herda, Dnіpropetrovs’k. 2014:64.
4. Pertseva TO, Kyreeva TV, Bielosludtceva KO.Retrospective analysis of lethal severe commu­nity acquired pneumonia cases: masks of severe pneumonia. Ukr Pulmonol J. 2013;2:26–30.
5. Kirieieva TV, Basina BO, Bielosludtseva KO.Pulmonary embolism in the therapeutic practice, risk assessment on the example of clinical case. Pharma Innov J. 2018;7(10):599–602.
6. Pertseva TA, Kyreyeva TV, Kravchenko NK.Difcult diagnosis. Clinical analysis of pneumo­nia overdiagnosis case. Medicni perspektivi Med Perspect. 2013;18(3):25–9.
7. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6964163/
8. https://read.qxmd.com/read/28515823/lupus- negative- libman- sacks- endocarditis-
complicated- by- catastrophic- antiphospholipid- syndrome
9. https://read.qxmd.com/read/17522239/nonbacterial- thrombotic- endocarditis- in- cancer-
patients- pathogenesis- diagnosis- and- treatment
10. https://read.qxmd.com/read/17881239/non- bacterial- thrombotic- endocarditis
11. https://read.qxmd.com/read/15115997/prosthetic- valve- thrombosis- twenty- year- experience-
at- the- montreal- heart- institute
12. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CHA2DS2%E2%80%93VASc_score
71
Chapter 11
Cardiac Amyloidosis Misdiagnosed asMonoclonal Gammopathy ofUndetermined Signicance
ShitijShrivastava
Learning Objectives
By the end of this presentation, the clinician will be able to:
1. Discuss the root causes which led to the false diagnosis of monoclonal gam­mopathy of undetermined signicance (MGUS).
2. Describe the diagnostic steps involved in diagnosing cardiac amyloidosis.
3. Interpret the autopsy report of the patient.
4. Explain the history of amyloidosis.
5. Identify and enumerate the elements physicians must avoid when forming a dif­ferential for abnormal protein tests.

Introduction

In 1838, Matthias Schleiden rst used the term “amyloid” to describe the composi­tion of a type of starch in plants. Before the word amyloid came into practice, “lar­daceous” or “waxy” was used to describe amyloid disease processes in the human body [1]. In 1856, Dr. Samuel Wilks, a British physician, biographer, and an avid user of the phrase “lardaceous disease,” described a 52-year-old male patient with lardaceous kidneys, heart, and spleen. This was most likely the rst case of primary amyloidosis reported in literature [1, 2]. However, the term “amyloid” persisted because of Virchow’s experiment. He added iodine to the sulfated glycosaminogly­cans (corpora amylacea) from brain tissue and what resulted was a color reaction from brown to blue, similar to starch [3].
S. Shrivastava (*) PGY-1, Internal Medicine, BronxCare Health System, Bronx, NY, USA
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 H. Tohid et al. (eds.), The Misdiagnosis Casebook in Clinical Medicine,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28296-6_11
73
74
S. Shrivastava
A high index of suspicion for amyloidosis, positive family history, and biopsy are essential for the correct diagnosis of amyloidosis [4]. There are various types of amyloidosis, affecting different and multiple organs [5]. The majority of patients are affected by either AL (acquired monoclonal immunoglobulin light chain) or ATTR (transthyretin-related) type [6, 7].

Clinical Case Presentation

A 62-year-old female arrived at the hospital with fatigue, dyspnea, an abnormal mammogram, and pulmonary edema for at least 3 months. Her medical history included bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), and her family history was posi­tive for breast cancer. The EKG revealed a previous myocardial infarct and a single run of supraventricular tachycardia with normal sinus rhythm. Her chest X-ray was signicant for mild bilateral pleural effusions and increased pulmonary congestion, which explained the orthopnea experienced by the patient. Laboratory tests showed highly elevated brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) (NT-proBNP, 2959pg/ml) and tro­ponin I of less than 0.3ng/ml. The patient was hospitalized. An echocardiogram performed during hospitalization was notable for right and left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction, decreased ejection fraction (EF) (<20%), and right and left atrial dilation. Other echo ndings were within normal limits. Former echocardio­grams were unavailable. Cardiac index measured in the cardiac catheterization lab­oratory was 2.2L/min/kg2 (N: 2.5–4.0). 99m technetium-pyrophosphate scan did not reveal any tracer uptake by the myocardium. Cardiac magnetic resonance imag­ing (CMR) revealed a normal LV wall thickness of 1.3cm without late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) in the basal short-axis cine view. Urine protein electrophoresis turned out to be 62mg/dl; however, serum protein electrophoresis with immuno­xation (SPIE) was within normal limits. The clinicians considered a diagnosis of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined signicance. Serum-free light chain assay (SFLC) and bone marrow biopsy were taken into consideration as MRI and SPIE were normal, and the patient was negative for CRAB criteria for multiple myeloma. The authors never consulted hematology and oncology services [8]. Despite aggressive medical management, her initial symptoms continued to worsen, and she required hospital admission after 8 months for severe cardiogenic shock. Repeated measurement of the cardiac index was done, and it had gone down from
2.2L/min/kg2 to 1.6L/min/kg [2]. The patient nally underwent a breast biopsy due to her abnormal mammogram and family history. Pink, amorphous substance was observed under the microscope, and a diagnosis of light chain (AL) amyloidosis was entertained. Hematology/oncology service was consulted, and SFLC assay, repeat echocardiogram, and urine protein immunoxation (UPIE) tests were per­formed. This time, the echocardiogram showed an interventricular thickness of
1.1cm (vs. 0.8cm previously), global hypokinesis, and mild dilation. Serum kappa and lambda levels were 22.1mg/dl and 880mg/dl, respectively (ratio: 0.03), and
11 Cardiac Amyloidosis Misdiagnosed as Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined…
urine immunoxation showed abnormal free lambda light chains. Subsequent tests (cardiac and bone marrow biopsies) could not be performed as the patient, unfortu­nately, passed away. Her clinical status had faded very rapidly [8].
75

Differential Diagnosis

1. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined signicance
2. Breast cancer
3. Light chain amyloidosis
What WasMisdiagnosed inThis Case andWhy?
In this ill-fated cardiology case, cardiac amyloidosis was misdiagnosed as MGUS due to normal apparent imaging and lack of resources [8]. Multiple reasons come into play when we dig deeper into the root causes.

Discussion

There are nine types of amyloidosis that have cardiac involvement. Usually, inva­sive and noninvasive diagnostic tests are combined to assist in diagnosing cardiac amyloidosis. It typically presents with both cardiac and extracardiac organ involve­ment. Such symptoms and signs are known as red ags. They include but are not limited to skin bruising, macroglossia, proteinuria, vitreous deposits, and unex­plained elevated troponin. The current position statement published by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) states that if the clinical picture, EKG, echocardio­gram, and CMR point toward cardiac amyloidosis, then scintigraphy and monoclo­nal protein assessment must be made. If both are positive, histological analysis is the next step to conrm the subtype. Histological conrmation should also be done if both CMR and hematologic tests are positive (or CMR is inconclusive) and scin­tigraphy is negative. If tests reveal no monoclonal spike and grade 1 uptake on scintigraphy, a biopsy becomes necessary for diagnosis. Grade 2–3 on scintigraphy indicates ATTR amyloidosis, and the patient must undergo genetic testing to distin­guish between acquired and hereditary forms (Fig.11.1) [9].
Endomyocardial biopsy showing amyloid brils in the heart is the gold standard of diagnosis. Red ag signs are not always there, but when present, they can dra­matically help in adding amyloidosis to the differential. One such nding is reduced longitudinal strain with apical sparing on echocardiogram [9]. In this case, the authors state that strain imaging was unavailable as they hadn’t updated their
76
S. Shrivastava
Fig. 11.1 Approach to cardiac amyloidosis evaluation in symptomatic heart failure [8]
software. After upgrading their system, a second look at the images showed longi­tudinal strain of −2 without apical sparing. It is interesting to note that LGE was nearly absent, and left ventricular wall thickness was normal in this patient despite having advanced disease. Septal thickness was also within normal limits initially. Although unlikely, the patient might have had recent AL amyloidosis on top of pre­existing dilated cardiomyopathy. One can argue against this assumption due to the abrupt clinical decline and heart failure progression. Lack of LGE could have been falsely absent due to the high amyloid burden and small cellular volume. Due to the fact that profound heart failure due to amyloidosis could not have occurred until there was myocardial inltration, CMR was rechecked, and difculty in nulling the myocardium was seen, which was earlier reasoned to be a motion artifact. The char­acteristic above is seen explicitly in inltrative disorders. In the presence of normal wall thickness, absence of LGE, and normal SPIE, labeling the nulling as a motion artifact seemed appropriate [8].
Additionally, T1 mapping equipment was not available in the hospital, and the patient never underwent T1 mapping for diagnosis [8]. In approximately 17% of patients, a free light chain might be the only protein present, leading to a negative serum protein electrophoresis result. Combined UPIE, SPIE, and SFLC quantica­tion have a sensitivity of 99% to detect AL amyloidosis. SFLC assay can pick up minute amounts of kappa and lambda chains [10].
11 Cardiac Amyloidosis Misdiagnosed as Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined…
77
Plan ofAction: ThePoints Clinician Should Consider– Pitfalls toAvoid
Don’t delay a biopsy in cases with abnormal protein tests, and make sure that the patient is compliant with follow-up appointments. Comprehensive care and high clinical suspicion of cardiac amyloidosis are vital for early diagnosis and manage­ment. Atypical presentations of amyloidosis may be seen in a few cases which require meticulous attention to detail, clinical history, and imaging studies. If needed, a referral to a quaternary center must be made for advanced imaging to take place. A difculty in nulling the myocardium is most commonly seen in inltrative disorders [8] such as cardiac amyloidosis, hemochromatosis, etc.
Pearls ofKnowledge toConsider
AL-type amyloidosis is an aggressive systemic disease that can affect the heart. The threshold for diagnosis must be low, especially in patients with carpal tunnel syn­drome, troponin elevation with normal left and right heart catheterization, and oncology must be consulted. Cardiac MRI must be carefully read and analyzed for nulling of myocardium and thickness of the interventricular septum. Serum and urine protein tests, cardiac imaging, and tissue biopsy are able to provide a deni­tive diagnosis in uncertain cases.
If Misdiagnosed, WasIt Realized Later?
Sadly, the patient died before endomyocardial and bone marrow biopsies could be obtained and appropriate therapy could be started. On autopsy, amyloid deposits were discovered in the heart and lungs. Interventricular septum thickness had increased from 1.1cm to 2.3cm since the last echocardiogram. Hypercellular bone marrow, cardiomegaly, plasma cell inltration, and LV wall thickness of 2.0 cm were observed [8].

Conclusion

Cardiac amyloidosis requires a prompt diagnosis as the disease can progress rapidly and eventually be fatal. Endomyocardial biopsy must not be deferred, regardless of circumstances, and a team approach must be used while diagnosing and interpreting abnormal protein studies.
78
S. Shrivastava
Original Article Link: https://www.cureus.com/articles/77219- slip- ups- in- the-
diagnosis- of- cardiac- amyloidosis- a- case- fatality- in- point

References

1. Kyle RA. Amyloidosis: a convoluted story. Br J Haematol. 2001;114:529–38. https://doi.
org/10.1046/j.1365- 2141.2001.02999.x.
2. Wilks S.Cases of lardaceous disease. Guys Hosp Rep 3rd Series. 1856;2:103–32.
3. Virchow R (1971). Cellular pathology as based upon physiological and pathological histology (English translation of second German edition).
4. Benson MD, Buxbaum JN, Eisenberg DS, Merlini G, Saraiva M, Sekijima Y, Sipe JD, Westermark P. Amyloid nomenclature 2018: recommendations by the International Society of Amyloidosis (ISA) nomenclature committee. Amyloid. 2018;25(4):215–9. https://doi.org/1
0.1080/13506129.2018.1549825.
5. Kapoor M, Rossor AM, Jaunmuktane Z, Lunn M, Reilly MM.Diagnosis of amyloid neuropa­thy. Pract Neurol. 2019;19(3):250–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/practneurol- 2018- 002098.
6. Rapezzi C, Merlini G, Quarta CC, Riva L, Longhi S, Leone O, Salvi F, Ciliberti P, Pastorelli F, Biagini E, Coccolo F, Cooke RM, Bacchi-Reggiani L, Sangiorgi D, Ferlini A, Cavo M, Zamagni E, Fonte ML, Palladini G, Salinaro F, Musca F, Obici L, Branzi A, Perlini S.Systemic cardiac amyloidoses: disease proles and clinical courses of the 3 main types. Circulation. 2009;120(13):1203–12. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.843334. Epub 2009 Sep 14
7. Maurer MS, Elliott P, Comenzo R, Semigran M, Rapezzi C. Addressing common ques­tions encountered in the diagnosis and management of cardiac amyloidosis. Circulation. 2017;135(14):1357–77. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024438.
8. Hobocan M, Shaik A, Saad A, etal. Slip-ups in the diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis: a case fatality in point. Cureus. 2022;14(2):e22458. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.22458.
9. Garcia-Pavia P, Rapezzi C, Adler Y, Arad M, Basso C, Brucato A, Burazor I, Caforio A, Damy T, Eriksson U, Fontana M, Gillmore JD, Gonzalez-Lopez E, Grogan M, Heymans S, Imazio M, Kindermann I, Kristen AV, Maurer MS, Merlini G, etal. Diagnosis and treatment of cardiac amyloidosis: a position statement of the ESC working group on myocardial and pericardial diseases. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(16):1554–68. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehab072.
10. Baker KR, Rice L.The Amyloidoses: clinical features, diagnosis and treatment. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2012;8(3):3–7. https://doi.org/10.14797/mdcj- 8- 3- 3.
Chapter 12
Metastatic Heart Cancer Misdiagnosed asAcute Myocardial Infarction
RaviVintha andPrakrutNishamanishSethi
Learning Objectives
By the end of this presentation, the clinician will be able to:
1. Discuss facts about acute myocardial infarction.
2. Explain about metastatic cancer of the heart.
3. Distinguish between the cardiac and noncardiac conditions that can mimic the electrocardiography changes similar to those seen in ST elevation myocardial infarction.
4. Differentiate metastatic cancer of the heart from other conditions.
5. Discuss conditions to be considered as a differential diagnosis for metastatic cancer of the heart.

Introduction

The most common cause of ST-elevation myocardial infarction is atherosclerosis, which leads to coronary blockage. Since the positive effects of reperfusion therapy are maximum when performed rapidly, early coronary reperfusion is required for ST elevation myocardial infarction. Electrocardiography (ECG) alterations compa­rable to those found in ST elevation myocardial infarction have been seen in a range of cardiac and noncardiac diseases. Central nervous system disease, perforated duo­denal ulcer, esophageal rupture, acute pancreatitis, pneumothorax,
R. Vintha (*) · P. N. Sethi St. Martinus University Faculty of Medicine, Willemstad, Curacao e-mail: ravi.vintha@martinus.edu; prakrut.sethi@martinus.edu
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 H. Tohid et al. (eds.), The Misdiagnosis Casebook in Clinical Medicine,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28296-6_12
79
80
R. Vintha and P. N. Sethi
pneumomediastinum, hyperkalemia, hypocalcemia, hypercalcemia, pheochromo­cytoma, and normal variations are all noncardiac diseases that mimic ST elevation myocardial infarction. Early repolarization, pericarditis, myocarditis, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, Brugada syndrome, and patients with left ventricular hypertrophy and left bundle branch block have all been linked to electrocardiography abnormali­ties that mirror ST elevation myocardial infarction [1]. However, there have been a few reports of ST elevation myocardial infarction mimics in patients with cardiac tumors. When compared to metastatic cardiac tumors, primary cardiac tumors are quite rare. Despite this, antemortem detection of cardiac metastases is uncommon due to the fact that the majority of them are clinically silent [2]. In this case report, an electrocardiography alteration simulating acute anterior ST elevation myocardial infarction was documented in a patient undergoing therapy for tongue cancer.

Clinical Case Presentation

A 63-year-old man was taken to the emergency room after experiencing an immedi­ate onset of chest pain. The patient was diagnosed with tongue cancer 2years ago. The tumor was completely resected, and radiotherapy was used to nish the proce­dure. There were no reported symptoms for the last 3years. He had no previous history of serious systemic disorders like diabetes, hypertension, or cardiovascular disease.
On examination, he appeared to be in good health, with the following vital signs:
Blood pressure: 129/74mm Hg Pulse rate: 74 beats per minute Respiratory rate: 17 breaths per minute Body temperature: 36.5 degrees Celsius Oxygen saturation: 95%
The heart sounds were normal, and no abnormalities were discovered during the chest examination. A repeat surface 12-lead electrocardiogram revealed sinus rhythm with ST segment elevation in all anterior leads, which was consistent with an acute anterior wall myocardial infarction. An urgent coronary angiography was performed on the patient, which indicated noncritical stenosis of the coronary artery.
An X-ray of the chest revealed a clear pulmonary examination and a moderately dilated heart. A large tumor affecting the free wall of the right ventricle and lling the hollow was discovered using standard transthoracic echocardiography.
Furthermore, echocardiography indicated right ventricle wall hypokinesia from the middle to the apex, conrming tumoral invasion. Transthoracic echocardiogra­phy revealed a D-shaped left ventricle in the short-axis view. To obtain precise information about the mass, computed tomography scan with contrast and magnetic resonance imaging were used. Finally, the presence of a tumor in the right ventricle was established.
12 Metastatic Heart Cancer Misdiagnosed asAcute Myocardial Infarction
Serial cardiac troponin readings were consistently negative, despite ST eleva­tions on the electrocardiogram remaining static. Based on the tumor’s echocardio­graphic features and the patient’s past history, we assumed it was a metastasis from primary tongue cancer. The patient sought further consultation to the oncology department after a referral was made. Sepsis occurred during the follow-up, and the patient died 2months after metastatic heart malignancy was discovered.
81

Differential Diagnosis

Other than metastasis, a differential diagnosis to consider is a primary cardiac tumor, such as myxoma, vegetation, or thrombus. Taking into account the position of the mass, as well as its echogenicity, and integrating all of this information with the patient’s medical history, can often lead to an appropriate diagnosis.

Discussion

A case of tongue cancer with cardiac involvement was reported, with electrocardi­ography alterations that resembled acute myocardial infarction. Before the echocar­diography was in use, only sporadic case reports diagnosed the right-sided cardiac tumors by angiography and diagnosed the right-sided cardiac tumors by angiogra­phy, and, however, detecting a tumor in the heart by echocardiography is not always straightforward [3].
For best imaging of heart morphology, most clinicians consider transesophageal echocardiography to be the procedure of choice. Due to swallowing difculties and a history of neck irradiation, our patient did not undergo transesophageal echocar­diography. Additional imaging modalities, such as computed tomography scan and magnetic resonance imaging, can aid in determining the exact location and amount of extracardiac extension, as well as demonstrating the lesion’s impact on adjacent structures [4].
A thoracic computed tomography scan was used to discover cancer involvement in the myocardium that had previously gone undetected. To examine neoplastic inltration of the heart, diagnostic methods such as echocardiography, magnetic resonance imaging, and computed tomography can be used. Such patients have a very high surgical death rate. Cardiac metastases are a difcult clinical problem due to their rarity and poor prognosis [2, 5]. Individualized treatment plans should be implemented in a multidisciplinary manner, taking into account the patient’s func­tional capacity, tumor features, and past treatment.
Despite the fact that surgery appears to be the best option at this time, cardiovas­cular metastasis has a terrible prognosis, with an average life expectancy of fewer than 6months after diagnosis [6]. In our case, the electrocardiography revealed a typical anomaly. The exact etiology of this electrocardiogram abnormality is