Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_2867_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Preface
- •Contents
- •Contributors
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Discussion
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Diagnostic Approach Toward Fixed Drug Eruptions
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Hypereosinophilic Syndrome Treatment Options
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Discussion
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Discussion
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Alternative Diagnosis/Potential Misdiagnosis
- •Note
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Alternative Diagnosis/Potential Misdiagnosis
- •Note
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Alternative Diagnosis Considered/Potential Misdiagnosis
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Alternative Diagnoses
- •Discussion
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Alternative Diagnoses
- •Discussion
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Discussion
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Discussion
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Plan of Action, the Points Clinician Should Consider, Pitfalls to Avoid, and Pearls of Knowledge to Consider
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Differential Diagnoses
- •Discussion
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Plan of Action, the Points Clinician Should Consider, Pitfalls to Avoid, and Pearls of Knowledge to Consider
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Case 1
- •Case 2
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Plan of Action, the Points Clinician Should Consider, Pitfalls to Avoid, and Pearls of Knowledge to Consider
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Plan of Action, the Points Clinician Should Consider, Pitfalls to Avoid, and Pearls of Knowledge to Consider
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Plan of Action, the Points Clinician Should Consider, Pitfalls to Avoid, and Pearls of Knowledge to Consider
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •The Plan of Action, Points to Consider, Pitfalls to Avoid, and Pearls of Knowledge
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Discussion
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Case Presentation
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •The Lawyers Are Watching
- •Misdiagnosis Versus Missed Diagnosis
- •Prostate Cancer Misdiagnosis
- •Breast Cancer Misdiagnosis
- •Exemplar Cases
- •Cardiac Misdiagnosis
- •COVID Misdiagnosis
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Conclusion
- •References

252
M. Mohammed
As a result of the methemoglobinemia induced left shift in the oxyhemoglobin
dissociation curve, compensatory increase in hemoglobin concentration is observed
in patients with recessive hereditary methemoglobinemia [6]. Congenital methemoglobinemia is classied into two main types: one due to deciency of methemoglobin reductase enzyme (cytochrome b5 reductase) and the other due to hemoglobin
M (abnormal oxygen afnity hemoglobin) [7]. Methemoglobin reductase enzyme
deciency is further classied into type I and type II; type I, cytochrome b5 reductase deciency, affects only RBCs, and patients most commonly present with
fatigue and dyspnea due to methemoglobinemia, and they have normal life
expectancy.
Type II methemoglobinemia, which constitutes about 10% of all cases of congenital methemoglobinemia, affects both RBCs and WBCs. It manifests with severe
neurologic dysfunction and reduced life expectancy with death occurring in the rst
few years of life. Cytochrome b5 reductase activity is less than 20% of normal [8,
9]. Patients with type I hereditary methemoglobinemia remain asymptomatic
throughout infancy and childhood and develop symptoms later in life. For this reason physicians tend to overlook congenital methemoglobinemia and rather think of
acquired methemoglobinemia, investigating exposure to exogenous oxidative stress
as the most likely cause of the manifestations. There is only one reported case
wherein the onset of manifestations in the patient started at the age of 8 years [10].
When congenital methemoglobinemia is considered, methemoglobin reductase
enzyme activity should be checked in all immediate family members. Because of
the autosomal recessive transmission, in heterozygous deciency, methemoglobin
reductase activity is low, and therefore heterozygotes will have a lower threshold for
development of acquired methemoglobinemia in response to oxidative stress exposure. However, under normal circumstances the level of enzyme activity is not too
low to cause clinical disease [11].
This rare hemoglobin disease is underreported and often overlooked and misdiagnosed. The rst description of familial idiopathic methemoglobinemia in the
United Kingdom was reported in two members of one family in 1943 [12].
In the English medical literature, there are only 23 cases diagnosed as congenital
methemoglobinemia due to deciency of cytochrome b5 reductase—17 cases of
type I and 6 cases of type II.Seventy-three percent of the cases are males and 26%
are females. About half of reported cases (12 cases) are Indian, 3 are English, 2 are
Japanese, 2 are Arabic, 1 case is Spanish, and 1 case is Italian.
The median calculated age for type I is 31 years with cyanosis and shortness of
breath being the most common clinical manifestation. For type II, all cases are in
the pediatric age group. The median calculated age at presentation is 6 years with
neurologic manifestations and mental retardation being the most common clinical
features in type II.
There are different treatment modalities: methylene blue alone, methylene blue
with vitamin C, or vitamin C alone. Vitamin C either alone or in combination with
methylene blue was used in seven cases within this category with no response in
one case [5], while the other six cases (including the case described here)
responded well.

35 Congenital Methemoglobinemia Misdiagnosed asPolycythemia Vera
253
Plan of Action, the Points Clinician Should Consider, Pitfalls to Avoid, and Pearls of Knowledge to Consider
Clinical cyanosis can be diagnostically challenging since causes are multiple, especially in the absence of cardiopulmonary causes. In this case, the cyanosis was basically overlooked and hematology workup was misdirected toward investigating
polycythemia. The nding of cyanosis and low oxygen saturation despite the normal arterial oxygen tension should strongly suggest methemoglobinemia. In heterozygous cytochrome b5 reductase deciency, methemoglobin reductase activity is
low, and the patient will have a lower threshold for acquired methemoglobinemia in
response to exogenous oxidative stress.
Conclusion
Because of the lack of systematic epidemiological studies, congenital methemoglobinemia is misdiagnosed since it is under-investigated and usually overlooked,
especially when patients develop symptoms in adulthood and in the absence of
obvious acquired agents. In this clinical case, which is misdiagnosed as polycythemia vera, we highlighted the challenges in diagnosis of congenital methemoglobinemia and pointed out the important points to consider as a physician to be able to
suspect this rare disease so that the proper treatment is administered and unnecessary treatment with imatinib and exposure to invasive bone marrow procedures are
avoided.
References
1. Jaffe ER, Hultquist DE, etal, eds. The metabolic and molecular basis of b5 reductase deciency
and enzymopenic hereditary methemoglobinemia. In: Inherited disease. 7th ed. NewYork,
NY: McGraw-Hill; 1995. p.2267–80.
2. Baraka AS, Ayoub CM, Kaddoum RN, et al. Severe oxyhemoglobin desaturation during
induction of anesthesia in a patient with congenital methemoglobinemia. Anesthesiology.
2001;95:1296–7.
3. Barker SJ, Tremper KK, Hyatt J.Effects of methemoglobinemia on pulse oximetry and mixed
venous oximetry. Anesthesiology. 1989;70:112–7.
4. Kern K, Langevin PB, Dunn BM.Methemoglobinemia after topical anesthesia with lidocaine
and benzocaine for a difcult intubation. J Clin Anesth. 2000;12:167–72.
5. Maurtua MA, Emmerling L, Ebrahim Z.Anesthetic management of a patient with congenital
methemoglobinemia. J Clin Anesth. 2004;16:455–7.
6. Fermo E, Bianchi P, Vercellati C, et al. Recessive hereditary methemoglobinemia: two novel
mutations in the NADH- cytochrome b5 reductase gene. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2008;41:50–5.
7. Miller DR.Hemoglobinopathies in children. Massachusetts: PSG Publishing; 1980.
8. Percy MJ, Lappin TR.Recessive congenital methaemoglobinaemia: cytochrome b5 reductase
deciency. Br J Hematol. 2008;141:298–308.

254
9. Hirono H.Lipids of myelin, white matter and gray matter in a case of generalized deciency
of cytochrome b5 reductase in congenital methemoglobinemia with mental retardation. Lipids.
1980;15:272–5.
10. Londhey V, Khadilkar K, Gad J, etal. Congenital methaemoglobinaemia: a rare cause of cyanosis in an adult patient. J Assoc Physicians India. 2014;62:269–71.
11. Shonola S, Da-Silva MD.Congenital methemoglobinemia: a rare cause of cyanosis in an adult
patient. J Assoc Physicians India. 2014;62:269–71.
12. Deeny J, Murdock ET, Rogan JJ. Familial idiopathic methaemoglobinaemia. Br Med
J. 1943;1:721.
M. Mohammed

Chapter 36
Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura
Misdiagnosed asAutoimmune Cytopenia
AdedamolaBello
Learning Objectives
By the end of this presentation, the clinician will be able to:
1. Create an appropriate differential diagnosis of thrombotic thrombocytopenic
purpura in the presence of microangiopathic hemolytic anemia and acute peripheral thrombocytopenia.
2. Evaluate the different components of the medical history and physical examination, which indicate the most appropriate order within the differential diagnosis
and hence a correct course of further diagnostic procedures needed to reach a
denitive diagnosis.
3. Review the diagnostic importance of peripheral blood smears for TTP.
4. Discuss the diagnostic role of genetic testing for ADAMTS13in TTP.
5. Analyze the impact of the delayed diagnosis on prognosis, sequelae, and quality
of life for patients.
Introduction
TTP (thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura) is a kind of thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) characterized by severe cytopenia (thrombocytopenia and hemolytic anemia). Additionally, extensive microvascular thrombi in TTP cause
multi-organ failure of varying severity with a 20% death rate [1]. A signicant
deciency of the von Willebrand factor-cleaving protease ADAMTS13
A. Bello (*)
St. Martinus University Faculty of Medicine, Willemstad, Curacao
e-mail: adedamola.bello1@martinus.edu
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023
H. Tohid et al. (eds.), The Misdiagnosis Casebook in Clinical Medicine,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28296-6_36
255

256
A. Bello
(ADisintegrin And Metalloproteinase with ThromboSpondin-1 motifs, 13th member) causes the accumulation of large multimers of von Willebrand factor (ULVWF)
in plasma. The presence of a signicant ADAMTS13 deciency is currently considered part of a positive diagnosis [1, 2]. TTP is a deadly disease that necessitates
prompt diagnosis and treatment in the event of an emergency. TTP, on the other
hand, might be difcult to diagnose in an emergency environment because of its
rarity (4 instances per 106 people per year) [3]. Furthermore, because TTP is characterized by peripheral cytopenias, it can be confused with other conditions, particularly autoimmune cytopenias (AIC) , such as autoimmune thrombocytopenia
associated or not with autoimmune hemolytic anemia (Evans syndrome) , which
adds to the difculty of obtaining a positive diagnosis [4]. In this context, determining the activity of ADAMTS13 is particularly useful in determining the diagnosis of TTP in patients with peripheral cytopenias [5]. However, in cases of
diagnosis ambiguity, a quick ADAMTS13 activity evaluation is not routinely
accessible in all centers, resulting in diagnostic inconclusiveness with potentially
severe repercussions on prognosis by delaying therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE).
As a result, it is critical to pinpoint the factors that lead to TTP misdiagnosis using
AIC, as well as the implications for prognosis. A retrospective multicenter study
was conducted, allowing for the retrograde analysis of the outcomes of these misdiagnoses and understanding the causes or missed events that led to a misdiagnosis
in these cases.
Clinical Case Presentation
A retrospective study was conducted. Based on these studies, it was found that
the clinical cases that were misdiagnosed as autoimmune cytopenias included
females with less profound anemia, lack of schistocyte observation on the rst
blood smear, more frequent history of autoimmune disorder, and less severe disease. In these presentations, a positive DAT was commonly observed, including
with immunoglobulin G (IgG) alone or in association with C3a, a complement
protein. Some misdiagnosed patients had both positive DAT and low or absent
schistocytes.
Patients were primarily misdiagnosed with Evans syndrome (51% of cases) and
autoimmune thrombocytopenia (37% of cases). Other diagnoses included heparininduced thrombocytopenia, HELLP syndrome, lymphoid neoplasm, medication
toxicity (two instances each), myelodysplastic syndrome, and catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (one case each). As an initial treatment, none of these individuals underwent TPE or plasma infusion. Intravenous immunoglobulins were given to
29 (34%) of the patients. Steroids were given to 45 patients (54%). Before TTP
diagnosis, rituximab, splenectomy, and danazol were also employed as initial treatment (in one instance each). The prior diagnosis was amended in the majority of
cases, and the TTP diagnosis was nally considered due to the fact that early treatment was ineffective (49%) and/or organ failure occurred (34%).

36 Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura Misdiagnosed asAutoimmune Cytopenia
Differential Diagnoses
1. Evans syndrome
Due to a history of autoimmune disorders in most cases, a less severe presenting anemia, lack of schistocytes initially, as well as positive direct antiglobulin
test and IgG.Evans syndrome was considered in most cases.
2. Autoimmune thrombocytopenia
Due to a history of autoimmune disorder in most cases, a less severe present-
ing anemia, lack of schistocytes initially, as well as positive direct antiglobulin
test and IgG.Autoimmune thrombocytopenia was considered in cases in which
the most signicant presenting symptom was thrombocytopenia.
3. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
In cases where the clinical picture may have included heparin use, the etiol-
ogy of thrombocytopenia was attributed to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
(HIT) rather than TTP.
4. HELLP
Hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count syndrome. Some
cases showed the presence of this constellation of symptoms without classic
schistocytes and HELLP was the primary working diagnosis in these cases.
257
What WasMisdiagnosed inThis Case andWhy?
Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura was misdiagnosed based on the following
observations:
1. Female gender
2. Less profound anemia than expected
3. Lack of/low amount of schistocytes on initial peripheral blood smear
4. Positive direct antiglobulin test
5. History of autoimmune disorder
Discussion
TTP is a potentially devastating illness whose prognosis has been dramatically
improved by intense TPE-based therapy [6–8]. As a result, a quick diagnosis is a
signicant priority, and reasons for misdiagnosis must be addressed in order to minimize diagnostic straying and delayed tailored therapy, which may result in higher
morbidity and death. In this national study, an unusually signicant proportion (20%)
of TTP patients were at rst misdiagnosed with an AIC, resulting in a 5-day delay in
appropriate management, a longer time to platelet count recovery, and more salvage
therapies that could have been avoided, despite the fact that overall mortality

258
A. Bello
remained comparable between the two groups. Importantly, misdiagnosed patients
are de facto selected patients who survived misdiagnosis’s consequences, and it cannot be ignored that some patients with an AIC misdiagnosis succumbed to the illness
before TTP was diagnosed and thus were not disclosed in the registry, potentially
underestimating the death rate and incidence of misdiagnosed patients. There are
various factors responsible for TTP misdiagnosed with AIC.The higher frequency of
AIC, which is three to eight times that of TTP [9], and the relatively recent availability of ADAMTS13 as a viable technique for distinguishing TTP from other disorders
both contribute to diagnostic inaccuracies. Furthermore, identifying a microangiopathic hemolytic anemia can prove to be complicated, especially in an emergency
situation; indeed, in a large group of patients, schistocytes were found to be low or
nonexistent in more than one-third of cases at rst presentation, but positive in the
days following. In 10% of all patients, a positive, low titer DAT that implies the diagnosis of autoimmune hemolytic anemia might be found, which adds to the difculty
of diagnosing microangiopathic hemolytic anemia. Positive DAT was noted anecdotally in the correctly identied group (5% of cases), which is consistent with prior
reports from other groups [6]. Almost 20% of patients in the misdiagnosed group had
a positive DAT.Further research is needed to examine the characteristics of antibodies directed against erythrocytes in these individuals, notably their specicity via
elution, in order to truly comprehend their pathogenic implications. This unanticipated outcome might be attributed in part to improved knowledge of TTP diagnosis,
enabling the detection of occurrences of TTP that were previously undetected prior
to the availability of ADAMTS13. These two confounding factors thus characterize
a subpopulation of patients with traditional AIC symptoms (low/absent schistocytes
and a positive DAT at rst presentation; 10% of the overall TTP population) for
whom TTP diagnosis is incredibly complex. Findings from this study suggest that a
positive DAT should not be used to rule out TTP diagnosis. Furthermore, in patients
with peripheral cytopenias, a repeated and more comprehensive search for schistocytes should be performed to reduce the chance of misdiagnosis, particularly in
patients with organ failure, when the diagnosis of TTP should be clearly favored until
ADAMTS13 activity is known. As per this statement, despite organ involvement that
should have suggested TTP, a disproportionately high number of TTP patients previously diagnosed with an AIC were detected. Interestingly, nearly half of misdiagnosed patients had a cerebral involvement, while neurologic events in AIC are
extremely rare (1–4% of cases) [10, 11] and are mostly precipitated by intracranial
hemorrhage. The emergence of cerebral sequelae following an initial diagnosis of
AIC was the primary cause for diagnosis revision, which led to the denitive diagnosis of TTP in the current investigation. Although the number of misdiagnosed patients
has declined with time, indicating that TTP has become much more well-recognized
than in the past, there are still a substantial number of misdiagnoses. These ndings
suggest that vigorous awareness campaigns for practitioners who may be involved in
the diagnosis of TTP, such as intensivists and urgent care physicians, hematologists,
internists, and nephrologists, as well as general practitioners, should be undertaken.
National policies should support awareness efforts focused on enhancing TTP diagnosis and early management in order to improve a broad understanding of these
uncommon illnesses [10, 12] and provide practitioners with a resource activity [13].

36 Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura Misdiagnosed asAutoimmune Cytopenia
259
Conclusion
TTP is commonly misdiagnosed with AIC, and characteristic biological markers
such as schistocytes may be lacking at rst, despite the presence of DAT.Low or
undetectable schistocytes upon immediate presentation should not rule out TTP in
the context of thrombocytopenia associated with hemolysis, especially when coupled with organ failure. Until ADAMTS13 testing is available, practitioners should
preferentially choose the diagnosis of TTP over that of AIC because of the catastrophic prognosis of an untreated TTP.
References
1. Grall M, Azoulay E, Galicier L, etal. Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura misdiagnosed as
autoimmune cytopenia: causes of diagnostic errors and consequence on outcome. Experience of
the French thrombotic microangiopathies reference centre. Am J Hematol. 2017;92(4):381–7.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.24665.
2. Sadler JE.What’s new in the diagnosis and pathophysiology of thrombotic thrombocytopenic
purpura. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2015;2015:631–6.
3. Mariotte E, Azoulay E, Galicier L, etal. Epidemiology and pathophysiology of adulthoodonset thrombotic microangiopathy with severe ADAMTS13 deciency (thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura): a cross-sectional analysis of the French national registry for thrombotic
microangiopathy. Lancet Haematol. 2016;3(5):e237e245.
4. Schneppenheim R, Budde U, Oyen F, etal. Von Willebrand factor cleaving protease and
ADAMTS13 mutations in childhood TTP.Blood. 2003;101:1845–50.
5. Crawley JTB, Scully MA.Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: basic pathophysiology and
therapeutic strategies. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2013;2013:292299.
6. Rock GA, Shumak KH, Buskard NA, etal. Comparison of plasma exchange with plasma infusion in the treatment of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:393–7.
7. George JN. Clinical practice. Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. N Engl J Med.
2006;354:1927–35.
8. Bell WR, Braine HG, Ness PM, et al. Improved survival in thrombotic thrombocytopenic
purpura-hemolytic uremic syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:398–403.
9. Moulis G, Palmaro A, Montastruc J-L, etal. Epidemiology of incident immune thrombocytopenia: a nationwide population-based study in France. Blood. 2014;124:3308–15.
10. Dutt T, Scully M.A proposal: the need for thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura specialist
centres–providing better outcomes. Br J Haematol. 2015;170:737–42.
11. Sarpatwari A, Bennett D, Logie JW, etal. Thromboembolic events among adult patients with
primary immune thrombocytopenia in the United Kingdom general practice research database.
Haematologica. 2010;95:1167–75.
12. Coppo P, Schwarzinger M, Buffet M, etal. Predictive features of severe acquired ADAMTS13
deciency in idiopathic thrombotic microangiopathies: the French TMA reference center
experience. PLoS One. 2010;5:e10208.
13. Coppo P, Corre E, Rondeau E, et al. Telemedicine in thrombotic microangiopathies: a way
forward in rare diseases requiring emergency care. Rev Med Interne. 2016;37:514–20.

Chapter 37
Hemoglobin H Disease andVitamin B12
Deciency Misdiagnosed asThrombotic
Thrombocytopenic Purpura
AdedamolaBello
Learning Objectives
By the end of this presentation, the clinician will be able to:
1. Create an appropriate differential diagnosis in patients presenting with signs and
symptoms of hemoglobin H disease.
2. Evaluate the different components of the medical history and physical examination, which indicate the most appropriate order within the differential diagnosis
and hence a correct course of further diagnostic procedures needed to reach a
denitive diagnosis.
3. Discuss the presence of hemoglobin H disease in high endemic locations where
nutritional deprivation might complicate the disease progression.
4. Discuss the impact of the delayed diagnosis on prognosis, inappropriate management, and quality of life for patients.
5. Discuss and enumerate the diagnostic approach to fatigue and weakness and the
appropriate investigations to elucidate the etiology of the illness.
Introduction
TTP (thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura) is a rare life-threatening blood disorder marked by several clinical signs and symptoms, including microangiopathic hemolytic anemia (MAHA), thrombocytopenia, fever, renal dysfunction,
and neurologic abnormalities [1, 2]. The majority of the time, clinical
A. Bello (*)
St. Martinus University Faculty of Medicine, Willemstad, Curacao
e-mail: adedamola.bello1@martinus.edu
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023
H. Tohid et al. (eds.), The Misdiagnosis Casebook in Clinical Medicine,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28296-6_37
261

262
A. Bello
practitioners consider TTP when patients have thrombocytopenia, increased lactic dehydrogenase (LDH), and schistocytes in a peripheral blood smear test,
albeit schistocytes may be nonexistent at the onset of the disease. If TTP is suspected, treatment should commence with exchange plasma transfusion [3], which
necessitates the installation of a central venous catheter (CVC) [4]. Clinically,
thrombotic microangiopathies (TMAs) are usually challenging to distinguish,
and measuring ADAMTS13 (a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with a thrombospondin type 1 motif, member 13) is still crucial for the diagnosis of TTP. In areas
of Asia and the Mediterranean region, as well as in nations where people migrate
from these regions, hemoglobin H illness is common [1]. Compound heterozygosity for both ɑ+ -thalassemia (resulting from the deletion of one ɑ-globin gene),
which is common and has carrier rates as high as 70% in some regions of the
world [ 2], and ɑ0 -thalassemia (resulting from the deletion of two globin genes in
cis), which was previously only seen in populations from specic regions [2] but
is now being seen in other ethnic groups, is present in patients with this disease
[1]. Rarely can point mutations in the gene that codes for ɑ+ -globin cause ɑ
+
-thalassemia [2]. Among these mutations is the variant that results in hemoglobin
Constant Spring, which is named after the Jamaican neighborhood where it was
rst discovered. This hemoglobinopathy is primarily found in people with
Southeast Asian ancestry and is brought on by a mutation in the stop codon of the
2-globin gene, which is characterized by 31 extra amino acid residues at the
C-terminus of the chain [3, 4]. Hemoglobin H illness, also known as deletional
hemoglobin H disease, is often caused by the interaction of ɑ0 -thalassemia and
deletional ɑ+- thalassemia (HbH). Although less frequent than HbH, non-deletional hemoglobin H illness, such as hemoglobin H Constant Spring (HCS), has
a more severe clinical course.
Clinical Case Presentation
An 8-year-old male presented to the emergency department with a 5-day history of
worsening fatigue and deteriorating weakness and an unremarkable medical history [5]. On examination the patient seemed in good relative condition, conjunctival pallor was noted, and vitals were within normal limits. Physical examination
was pertinent for hepatomegaly and splenomegaly (both noted at 5cm under the
costal arch). Diagnostic blood tests were obtained which revealed severe normocytic normochromic anemia with a hematocrit of 11% and hemoglobin of 3.8 gr/
dL, mean corpuscular volume of 83.5fL, and increased red blood cell distribution
width of 20% [5]. The patient had a platelet count of 130,000/mL, a normal WBC
count, and a reticulocyte count of 0.1% [5]. The chemistry panel showed an
extreme elevation of LDH above 3700IU/L [5]. Clotting assay resulted in a slight
INR elevation at 1.12 and borderline brinogen of 155mg/dL [5]. The patient was
admitted at this time and transfused with four units of red blood cells [5]. Despite
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
