Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_1267_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
15 Мб
Скачать
☆
4 Epigenetic Regulation ofIntestinal Fibrosis
51
[37, 38,
TGF-β, Th1 qRT-PCR,
Pathway/
function Methods References
Expression
level Target
89, 90]
93–95]
DNA-ChIP
TGF-β, EMT qRT-PCR [26, 40, 47,
PDCD4
Reduced Collagen I and III,
TGF-β, EMT qRT-PCR [91]
Smad3, IL-12p40,
IL-23
Decreased Smad2, E-cadherin,
[96–98]
qRT-PCR, in situ
hybridization
Cytokine
production
Smad3
ZEB1
Downregulated MIP-2α, SIP1, NOD2,
33]
Increased FOXO3a, IL-8, IκBα Th17 qRT-PCR [100]
Decreased SOCS3 JAK/STAT qRT-PCR [11, 12, 30,
Table 4.3 Summary of non-coding RNAs associated with intestinal brosis in Crohn’s disease
Mucosa overlying strictures, mucosal
broblasts, human dendritic cells from
CD
miR-29/
miR-21 Ileal CD tissue with different phenotypes Increased Smad7, Smad3, RhoB,
microRNA Human tissue
miR-29b
cells
miR-19b Intestinal pinch biopsy, intestinal
epithelial cells
CDKN2B-AS1 Colonic samples, colonocyte cell line Decreased TGF-β TGF-β qRT-PCR [101]
biopsies from the sigmoid colon
biopsies
miR-192 Active UC tissue, colonscopic pinch
miR-200 family Intestinal epithelial cells, intestinal
pinch biopsy, intestinal epithelial HT29
miR-155 Intestinal myobroblasts, colonic mucosa
miR-143/145 Intestinal mesenchymal cells Decreased IGFBP5, PI3K/Akt IGF qRT-PCR [99]
52
C. Li and J. F. Kuemmerle
peripheral blood were reported between patients with UC and CD to differentiate the diagnosis of IBD [93, 94, 102]. The study of the role of miRNAs in IBD has yielded signicant insights with a deeper understanding yet to be gleaned. Even though there is much progression in anti-inammation treatment of IBD in clinical trials and practice, the frequency of stricture complication post-surgery and after immunotherapy is still high and no cure for targeted brosis is currently available [7–10].
4.11 Long Non-Coding RNA andFibrosis
The understanding of the regulatory role of long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) on gene expression as it relates to brosis is emerging. Examination of the transcrip­tome of lncRNAs in IBD has demonstrated expression proles that distinguish inamed and non-inamed Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis [103, 104]. The lncRNA CDKN2B-AS1 is associated with both Crohn’s disease and ulcerative coli­tis and is downregulated by TGF-β [101]. From a functional perspective the lncRNA H19 is protective against renal brosis whereas Wisp2-super-enhancer associated RNA, Wisper, controls cardiac brosis [105, 106].

4.12 Summary

GWAS analysis of Crohn’s disease has identied numerous risk loci that account for up to 25% of the genetic risk. Recent investigations of the epigenome indicate dif­ferential changes in DNA methylation patterns, histone modications and differen­tial expression of miRs can further contribute to the “heritable” risk of developing brostenotic Crohn’s disease. Integration of genetic susceptibility with changes in the epigenome associated with the development of intestinal brosis has been dem­onstrated for several genes key to the development of brosis in Crohn’s disease including STAT3, Smad3, Smad7 and SOCS3. Preclinical studies from different laboratories have supported the potential of epigenetic therapeutics including DNMTs inhibitors, HDAC inhibitors including butyrate, a natural HDAC inhibitor, and the histone methylation inhibitor EZH2. It is also important to note that the commensal microbiota have a direct impact on the host epigenome but the correla­tion between the two and Crohn’s disease phenotype is as yet unknown.
For progress to be made in Crohn’s disease efforts to understand the epigenome and it changes that relates to the identied risk loci and their associated pathways and thus the missing heritability of brosis will be needed. This understanding will only improve from our exploration of strictly phenotyped and genotyped patients with brosis using well-dened disease-relevant cell populations.
Acknowledgments Supported by DK49691 from NIH: National Institutes for Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases (JFK).
4 Epigenetic Regulation ofIntestinal Fibrosis
53

References

1. Jostins L, Ripke S, Weersma RK, etal. Host-microbe interactions have shaped the genetic
architecture of inammatory bowel disease. Nature. 2012;491:119–24.
2. Rivas MA, Beaudoin M, Gardet A, etal. Deep resequencing of GWAS loci identies indepen-
dent rare variants associated with inammatory bowel disease. Nat Genet. 2011;43:1066–73.
3. Cleynen I, Mahachie John JM, Henckaerts L, et al. Molecular reclassication of Crohn’s
disease by cluster analysis of genetic variants. PLoS One. 2010;5:e12952.
4. Essers JB, Lee JJ, Kugathasan S, et al. Established genetic risk factors do not distinguish
early and later onset Crohn’s disease. Inamm Bowel Dis. 2009;15:1508–14.
5. Hu P, Muise AM, Xing X, Brumell JH, Silverberg MS, Xu W. Association between a
multi-locus genetic risk score and inammatory bowel disease. Bioinform Biol Insights. 2013;7:143–52.
6. Huang C, Haritunians T, Okou DT, et al. Characterization of genetic loci that affect sus-
ceptibility to inammatory bowel diseases in African Americans. Gastroenterology. 2015;149:1575–86.
7. Liu JZ, van Sommeren S, Huang H, etal. Association analyses identify 38 susceptibility loci
for inammatory bowel disease and highlight shared genetic risk across populations. Nat Genet. 2015;47:979–86.
8. Zuk O, Hechter E, Sunyaev SR, Lander ES.The mystery of missing heritability: genetic
interactions create phantom heritability. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:1193–8.
9. Epigenetics KL. An epigenetic twist on the missing heritability of complex traits. Nat Rev
Genet. 2014;15:218.
10. Loddo I, Romano C.Inammatory bowel disease: genetics, epigenetics and pathogenesis.
Front Immunol. 2015;6:551.
11. Kanehisa M, Sato Y, Kawashima M, Furumichi M, Tanabe M.KEGG as a reference resource
for gene and protein annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;44:D457.
12. Li C, Iness A, Yoon J, et al. Noncanonical STAT3 activation regulates excess TGF-β1
and collagen I expression in muscle of stricturing Crohn’s disease. J Immunol. 2015;194: 3422–31.
13. Flynn RS, Murthy KS, Grider JR, Kellum JM, Kuemmerle JF.Endogenous IGF-I and [alpha]
V[beta]3 integrin ligands regulate increased smooth muscle hyperplasia in stricturing Crohn's disease. Gastroenterology. 2010;138:285–93.
14. Li C, Grider JR, Kuemmerle JF. 361 antagomir to microRNA-21 reverses the loss of nega-
tive TGF-signaling from inappropriately decreased Smad7 expression in Crohn's dis­ease, and decreases excess collagen, CTGF, IGF-I and brosis in TNBS-induced colitis. Gastroenterology. 2012;142:S-85.
15. Monteleone G, Del Vecchio Blanco G, Monteleone I, et al. Post-transcriptional regula-
tion of Smad7 in the gut of patients with inammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 2005;129:1420–9.
16. Monteleone G, Kumberova A, Croft NM, McKenzie C, Steer HW, MacDonald TT.Blocking
Smad7 restores TGF-β1 signaling in chronic inammatory bowel disease. J Clin Invest. 2001;108:601–9.
17. Meijer MJW, Mieremet-Ooms MAC, van Hogezand RA, Lamers CBHW, Hommes DW,
Verspaget HW.Role of matrix metalloproteinase, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase and tumor necrosis factor-α single nucleotide gene polymorphisms in inammatory bowel dis­ease. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13:2960–6.
18. Henckaerts L, Van Steen K, Verstreken I, etal. Genetic risk proling and prediction of disease
course in Crohn’s disease patients. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7:972–80.e2.
19. Satsangi J, Silverberg MS, Vermeire S, Colombel J-F.The Montreal classication of inam-
matory bowel disease: controversies, consensus, and implications. Gut. 2006;55:749–53.
20. Feinberg AP. Phenotypic plasticity and the epigenetics of human disease. Nature.
2007;447:433–40.
54
21. Yang IV, Schwartz DA. Epigenetics of idiopathic pulmonary brosis. Transl Res.
2015;165:48–60.
22. Petronis A.Epigenetics as a unifying principle in the aetiology of complex traits and diseases.
Nature. 2010;465:721–7.
23. Trerotola M, Relli V, Simeone P, Alberti S.Epigenetic inheritance and the missing heritabil-
ity. Hum Genomics. 2015;9:17.
24. Zeybel M, Hardy T, Wong YK, Mathers JC, Fox CR, Gackowska A.Multigenerational epi-
genetic adaptation of the hepatic wound-healing response. Nat Med. 2012;18:1369.
25. Krichevsky AM, Gabriely G. miR-21: a small multi-faceted RNA. J Cell Mol Med.
2009;13:39–53.
26. Nijhuis A, Biancheri P, Lewis A, et al. In Crohn’s disease brosis-reduced expression
of the miR-29 family enhances collagen expression in intestinal broblasts. Clin Sci. 2014;127:341–50.
27. Li C, Kuemmerle, JF. Epigenetic silencing of Smad7 contributes to brosis stricturing
Crohn’s disease. Crohn’s & Colitis Conference, Gastroenterology. 2018;154:S17. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2017.11.069
28. Agarwal V, Bell GW, Nam J-W, Bartel DP. Predicting effective microRNA target sites in
mammalian mRNAs. elife. 2015;Aug 12:4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05005
29. Adams AT, Kennedy NA, Hansen R, etal. Two-stage genome-wide methylation proling in
childhood-onset Crohn’s disease implicates epigenetic alterations at the VMP1/MIR21 and HLA loci. Inamm Bowel Dis. 2014;20:1784–93.
30. Fourouclas N, Li J, Gilby DC, etal. Methylation of the suppressor of cytokine signaling 3
gene (SOCS3) in myeloproliferative disorders. Haematologica. 2008;93:1635–44.
31. Marmorstein R, Trievel RC.Histone modifying enzymes: structures, mechanisms, and speci-
cities. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009;1789:58–68.
32. ENCODE Project Consortium. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human
genome. Nature. 2012;489:57–74.
33. Dakhlallah D, Batte K, Wang Y, etal. Epigenetic regulation of miR-17–92 contributes to the
pathogenesis of pulmonary brosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;187:397–405.
34. Hu B, Gharaee-Kermani M, Wu Z, Phan SH.Epigenetic regulation of myobroblast differen-
tiation by DNA methylation. Am J Pathol. 2010;177:21–8.
35. Evans IC, Barnes JL, Garner IM, etal. Epigenetic regulation of cyclooxygenase-2 by meth-
ylation of c8orf4in pulmonary brosis. Clin Sci. 2016;130:575–86.
36. Coward WR, Feghali-Bostwick CA, Jenkins G, Knox AJ, Pang L.A central role for G9a
and EZH2in the epigenetic silencing of cyclooxygenase-2in idiopathic pulmonary brosis. FASEB J. 2014;28:3183–96.
37. Zhong X, Chung ACK, Chen H-Y, Meng X-M, Lan HY. Smad3-mediated upregulation of
miR-21 promotes renal brosis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;22:1668–81.
38. Ribas J, Ni X, Castanares M, etal. A novel source for miR-21 expression through the alterna-
tive polyadenylation of VMP1 gene transcripts. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:6821.
39. Noetel A, Kwiecinski M, Elmova N, Huang J, Odenthal M. microRNA are central players
in anti- and probrotic gene regulation during liver brosis. Front Physiol. 2012;3:49.
40. Qin W, Chung ACK, Huang XR, etal. TGF-β/Smad3 signaling promotes renal brosis by
inhibiting miR-29. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;22:1462–74.
41. Ko YA, Mohtat D, Suzuki M, etal. Cytosine methylation changes in enhancer regions of core
pro-brotic genes characterize kidney brosis development. Genome Biol. 2013;14:R108.
42. Watson CJ, Horgan S, Neary R, etal. Epigenetic therapy for the treatment of hypertension-
induced cardiac hypertrophy and brosis. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2016;21:127–37.
43. Tzouvelekis A, Kaminski N. Epigenetics in idiopathic pulmonary brosis. Biochem Cell
Biol. 2015;93:159–70.
44. Wang Z, Chen C, Finger SN, etal. Suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid: a potential epigenetic
therapeutic agent for lung brosis? Eur Respir J. 2009;34:145–55.
45. Iorio MV, Piovan C, Croce CM.Interplay between microRNAs and the epigenetic machin-
ery: an intricate network. Biochim Biophys Acta Gene Regul Mech. 2010;1799:694–701.
C. Li and J. F. Kuemmerle
4 Epigenetic Regulation ofIntestinal Fibrosis
46. Saini HK, Grifths-Jones S, Enright AJ.Genomic analysis of human microRNA transcripts.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:17719–24.
47. Maurer B, Stanczyk J, Jüngel A, etal. MicroRNA-29, a key regulator of collagen expression
in systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62:1733–43.
48. Nimmo ERP, Prendergast JGP, Aldhous MCP, et al. Genome-wide methylation proling
in Crohn’s disease identies altered epigenetic regulation of key host defense mechanisms including the Th17 pathway. Inamm Bowel Dis. 2012;18:889–99.
49. Rivera CM, Ren B.Mapping human epigenomes. Cell. 2013;155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
cell.2013.09.011.
50. Baubec T, Colombo DF, Wirbelauer C, etal. Genomic proling of DNA methyltransferases
reveals a role for DNMT3B in genic methylation. Nature. 2015;520:243–7.
51. Tahiliani M, Koh KP, Shen Y, etal. Conversion of 5-methylcytosine to 5- hydroxymethylcytosine
in mammalian DNA by MLL partner TET1. Science. 2009;324:930–5.
52. Hackett Jamie A, Surani MA.Beyond DNA: programming and inheritance of parental meth-
ylomes. Cell. 2013;153:737–9.
53. McDermott E, Ryan EJ, Tosetto M, etal. DNA methylation proling in inammatory bowel
disease provides new insights into disease pathogenesis. J Crohns Colitis. 2016;10:77.
54. Mann DA.Epigenetics in liver disease. Hepatology. 2014;60:1418–25.
55. Yang IV, Pedersen BS, Rabinovich E, et al. Relationship of DNA methylation and gene
expression in idiopathic pulmonary brosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;190:1263–72.
56. Luo Y, Wang Y, Shu Y, Lu Q, Xiao R. Epigenetic mechanisms: an emerging role in
pathogenesis and its therapeutic potential in systemic sclerosis. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2015;67:92–100.
57. Neary R, Watson CJ, Baugh JA. Epigenetics and the overhealing wound: the role of DNA
methylation in brosis. Fibrogenesis Tissue Repair. 2015;8:1–13.
58. Tao H, Yang J-J, Shi K-H, Deng Z-Y, Li J.DNA methylation in cardiac brosis: new advances
and perspectives. Toxicology. 2014;323:125–9.
59. Rabinovich EI, Kapetanaki MG, Steinfeld I, etal. Global methylation patterns in idiopathic
pulmonary brosis. PLoS One. 2012;7:e33770.
60. Sanders YY, Ambalavanan N, Halloran B, etal. Altered DNA methylation prole in idio-
pathic pulmonary brosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;186:525–35.
61. Fogel O, Richard-Miceli C, Tost J.Epigenetic changes in chronic inammatory diseases. Adv
Protein Chem Struct Biol. 2017;106:139–89. ISSN 1876-1623.
62. Calvo-Garrido J, Carilla-Latorre S, Escalante R.Vacuole membrane protein 1, autophagy and
much more. Autophagy. 2008;4(6):835–7.
63. Li C, Kuemmerle JF. Increased pro-brotic miR-21 and decreased anti-brotic miR-29b
regulate TGF-β1 signaling, TGF-β1-dependent collagen-I expression and brosis in broste­notic (B2) Crohn’s disease. Inamm Bowel Dis. 2014;20:2.
64. Mariño-Ramírez L, Kann MG, Shoemaker BA, Landsman D.Histone structure and nucleo-
some stability. Expert Rev Proteomics. 2005;2:719–29.
65. Li B, Carey M, Workman JL.The role of chromatin during transcription. Cell. 2007;128:
707–19.
66. Karlic R, Chung HR, Lasserre J, Vlahovicek K, Vingron M.Histone modication levels are
predictive for gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:2926–31.
67. Sun G, Reddy MA, Yuan H, Lanting L, Kato M, Natarajan R.Epigenetic histone methylation
modulates brotic gene expression. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;21(12):2069–80. https://doi.
org/10.1681/ASN.2010060633. Epub 2010 Oct 7.
68. Fernández AF, Bayón GF, Urdinguio RG, Toraño EG, García MG, Carella A, Petrus-Reurer
S, Ferrero C, Martinez-Camblor P, Cubillo I, García-Castro J, Delgado-Calle J, Pérez-Campo FM, Riancho JA, Bueno C, Menéndez P, Mentink A, Mareschi K, Claire F, Fagnani C, Medda E, Toccaceli V, Brescianini S, Moran S, Esteller M, Stolzing A, de Boer J, Nisticò L, Stazi MA, Fraga MF. H3K4me1 marks DNA regions hypomethylated during aging in human stem and differentiated cells. Genome Res. 2015;25(1):27–40. https://doi.org/10.1101/
gr.169011.113. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
55
56
69. Robertson AG, Bilenky M, Tam A, Zhao Y, Zeng T, Thiessen N, Cezard T, Fejes AP, Wederell
ED, Cullum R, Euskirchen G, Krzywinski M, Birol I, Snyder M, Hoodless PA, Hirst M, Marra MA, Jones SJ. Genome-wide relationship between histone H3 lysine 4 mono- and tri-methylation and transcription factor binding. Genome Res. 2008;18(12):1906–17. https://
doi.org/10.1101/gr.078519.108. Epub 2008 Sep 11.
70. Barski A, Cuddapah S, Cui K, Roh TY, Schones DE, Wang Z, Wei G, Chepelev I, Zhao K.High-
resolution proling of histone methylations in the human genome. Cell. 2007;129(4):823–37.
71. Lauberth SM, Nakayama T, Wu X, Ferris AL, Tang Z, Hughes SH, Roeder RG.H3K4me3
interactions with TAF3 regulate preinitiation complex assembly and selective gene activa­tion. Cell. 2013;152(5):1021–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.01.052.
72. Karmodiya K, Krebs AR, Oulad-Abdelghani M, Kimura H, Tora L.H3K9 and H3K14 acety-
lation co-occur at many gene regulatory elements, while H3K14ac marks a subset of inactive inducible promoters in mouse embryonic stem cells. BMC Genomics. 2012;13:424. https://
doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-13-424.
73. Lehnertz B, Ueda Y, Derijck AA, Braunschweig U, Perez-Burgos L, Kubicek S, Chen T,
Li E, Jenuwein T, Peters AH.Suv39h-mediated histone H3 lysine 9 methylation directs DNA methylation to major satellite repeats at pericentric heterochromatin. Curr Biol. 2003;13(14):1192–200.
74. Creyghton MP, Cheng AW, Welstead GG, Kooistra T, Carey BW, Steine EJ, Hanna J, Lodato
MA, Frampton GM, Sharp PA, Boyer LA, Young RA, Jaenisch R.Histone H3K27ac sepa­rates active from poised enhancers and predicts developmental state. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(50):21931–6. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1016071107. Epub 2010 Nov 24.
75. Kouzarides T.SnapShot: histone-modifying enzymes. Cell. 2007;131(4):822.
76. Rougeulle C, Chaumeil J, Sarma K, Allis CD, Reinberg D, Avner P, Heard E.Differential
histone H3 Lys-9 and Lys-27 methylation proles on the X chromosome. Mol Cell Biol. 2004;24(12):5475–84.
77. Schwartz S, Meshorer E, Ast G.Chromatin organization marks exon-intron structure. Nat
Struct Mol Biol. 2009;16(9):990–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.1659.
78. Feng Q, Wang H, Ng HH, Erdjument-Bromage H, Tempst P, Struhl K, Zhang Y.Methylation
of H3-lysine 79 is mediated by a new family of HMTases without a SET domain. Curr Biol. 2002;12(12):1052–8.
79. Wang Z, Zang C, Rosenfeld JA, Schones DE, Barski A, Cuddapah S, Cui K, Roh TY, Peng W,
Zhang MQ, Zhao K.Combinatorial patterns of histone acetylations and methylations in the human genome. Nat Genet. 2008;40(7):897–903. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.154. Epub 2008 Jun 15.
80. Coward WR, Watts K, Feghali-Bostwick CA, Jenkins G, Pang L. Repression of IP-10 by
interactions between histone deacetylation and hypermethylation in idiopathic pulmonary brosis. Mol Cell Biol. 2010;30:2874–86.
81. Perugorria MJ, Wilson CL, Zeybel M, et al. Histone methyltransferase ASH1 orches-
trates brogenic gene transcription during myobroblast transdifferentiation. Hepatology. 2012;56:1129–39.
82. Tsaprouni LG, Ito K, Powell JJ, Adcock IM, Punchard N.Differential patterns of histone
acetylation in inammatory bowel diseases. J Inamm. 2011;8:1.
83. Ventham NT, Kennedy NA, Nimmo ER, Satsangi J.Beyond gene discovery in inammatory
bowel disease: the emerging role of epigenetics. Gastroenterology. 2013;145:293–308.
84. Mokry M, Middendorp S, Wiegerinck CL, etal. Many inammatory bowel disease risk loci
include regions that regulate gene expression in immune cells and the intestinal epithelium. Gastroenterology. 2014;146:1040–7.
85. Sadler T, Scarpa M, Rieder F, West G, Stylianou E.Cytokine-induced chromatin modica-
tions of the type I collagen alpha 2 gene during intestinal endothelial-to-mesenchymal transi­tion. Inamm Bowel Dis. 2013;19:1354–64.
86. Sato F, Tsuchiya S, Meltzer SJ, Shimizu K. MicroRNAs and epigenetics. FEBS J.
2011;278:1598.
C. Li and J. F. Kuemmerle
4 Epigenetic Regulation ofIntestinal Fibrosis
87. Liu G, Friggeri A, Yang Y, etal. miR-21 mediates brogenic activation of pulmonary bro-
blasts and lung brosis. J Exp Med. 2010;207:1589–97.
88. Zhang Y, Huang X-R, Wei L-H, Chung ACK, Yu C-M, Lan H-Y. miR-29b as a therapeutic
agent for angiotensin II-induced cardiac brosis by targeting TGF-[beta]/Smad3 signaling. Mol Ther. 2014;22:974–85.
89. Rehman A, Sina C, Gavrilova O, Häsler R, Ott S, Baines JF, Schreiber S, Rosenstiel
P. Nod2 is essential for temporal development of intestinal microbial communities. Gut. 2011;60(10):1354–62.
90. Zhang Y, Huang XR, Wei LH, Chung AC, Yu CM, Lan HY. miR-29b as a therapeutic agent
for angiotensin II-induced cardiac brosis by targeting TGF-β/Smad3 signaling. Mol Ther. 2014;22(5):974–85.
91. Korpal M, Lee ES, Hu G, Kang Y.The miR-200 family inhibits epithelial-mesenchymal tran-
sition and cancer cell migration by direct targeting of E-cadherin transcriptional repressors ZEB1 and ZEB2. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(22):14910–4.
92. Mogilyansky E, Rigoutsos I.The miR-17/92 cluster: a comprehensive update on its genom-
ics, genetics, functions and increasingly important and numerous roles in health and disease. Cell Death Differ. 2013;20:1603–14.
93. Ludwig K, Fassan M, Mescoli C, Pizzi M, Balistreri M, Albertoni L, Pucciarelli S, Scarpa M,
Sturniolo GC, Angriman I, Rugge M.PDCD4/miR-21 dysregulation in inammatory bowel disease-associated carcinogenesis. Virchows Arch. 2013;462(1):57–63.
94. Yang Y, Ma Y, Shi C, Chen H, Zhang H, Chen N, Zhang P, Wang F, Yang J, Yang J, Zhu
Q, Liang Y, Wu W, Gao R, Yang Z, Zou Y, Qin H. Overexpression of miR-21in patients with ulcerative colitis impairs intestinal epithelial barrier function through targeting the Rho GTPase RhoB.Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2013;434(4):746–52.
95. Seiderer J, Brand S, Herrmann KA, Schnitzler F, Hatz R, Crispin A, Pfennig S, Schoenberg
SO, Göke B, Lohse P, Ochsenkuhn T.Predictive value of the CARD15 variant 1007fs for the diagnosis of intestinal stenoses and the need for surgery in Crohn’s disease in clinical prac­tice: results of a prospective study. Inamm Bowel Dis. 2006;12(12):1114–21.
96. Shi C, Liang Y, Yang J, Xia Y, Chen H, Han H, Yang Y, Wu W, Gao R, Qin H.MicroRNA-21
knockout improve the survival rate in DSS induced fatal colitis through protecting against inammation and tissue injury. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e66814.
97. Kato M, Zhang J, Wang M, Lanting L, Yuan H, Rossi JJ, Natarajan R. MicroRNA-192 in
diabetic kidney glomeruli and its function in TGF-beta-induced collagen expression via inhibition of E-box repressors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(9):3432–7. Epub 2007 Feb 20.
98. Kato M, Putta S, Wang M, Yuan H, Lanting L, Nair I, Gunn A, Nakagawa Y, Shimano H,
Todorov I, Rossi JJ, Natarajan R. TGF-beta activates Akt kinase through a microRNA­dependent amplifying circuit targeting PTEN.Nat Cell Biol. 2009;11(7):881–9.
99. Josse C, Bouznad N, Geurts P, Irrthum A, Huynh-Thu VA, Servais L, Hego A, Delvenne P,
Bours V, Oury C.Identication of a microRNA landscape targeting the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway in inammation-induced colorectal carcinogenesis. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2014;306(3):G229–43.
100. Pathak S, Grillo AR, Scarpa M, Brun P, D'Incà R, Nai L, Banerjee A, Cavallo D, Barzon L,
Palù G, Sturniolo GC, Buda A, Castagliuolo I.MiR-155 modulates the inammatory phe­notype of intestinal myobroblasts by targeting SOCS1in ulcerative colitis. Exp Mol Med. 2015;47:e164.
101. Pothoulakis C, Iliopoulos D, Rankin R, Padua D. P-307 the long non-coding RNA,
CDKN2B-AS1, is associated with IBD and is downregulated by TGF-beta. Inamm Bowel Dis. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.MIB.0000512848.22206.04.
102. Wu F, Zikusoka M, Trindade A, Dassopoulos T, Harris ML, Bayless TM, Brant SR, Chakravarti
S, Kwon JH.MicroRNAs are differentially expressed in ulcerative colitis and alter expression of macrophage inammatory peptide-2 alpha. Gastroenterology. 2008;135(5):1624–1635. e24.
57
58
103. Mirza AH, Berthelsen CH, Seemann SE, Pan X, Frederiksen KS, Vilien M, Gorodkin J,
Pociot F. Transcriptomic landscape of lncRNAs in inammatory bowel disease. Genome Med. 2015;7(1):39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-015-0162-2. eCollection 2015.
104. Hrdlickova B, Kumar V, Kanduri K, Zhernakova DV, Tripathi S, Karjalainen J, Lund RJ, Li
Y, Ullah U, Modderman R, Abdulahad W, Lähdesmäki H, Franke L, Lahesmaa R, Wijmenga C, Withoff S.Expression proles of long non-coding RNAs located in autoimmune disease­associated regions reveal immune cell-type specicity. Genome Med. 2014;6(10):88. https://
doi.org/10.1186/s13073-014-0088-0. eCollection 2014.
105. Xie H, Xue DJ, Chao F, Jin YF, Fu Q. Long non-coding RNA-H19 antagonism protects
against renal brosis. Oncotarget. 2016;7(32):51473–81.
106. Micheletti R, Plaisance I, Abraham BJ, Sarre A, Ting CC, Alexanian M, Maric D, Maison D,
Nemir M, Young RA, Schroen B, González A, Ounzain S, Pedrazzini T.The long noncoding RNA Wisper controls cardiac brosis and remodeling. Sci Transl Med. 2017;9(395):eaai9118.
https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aai9118.
C. Li and J. F. Kuemmerle
Chapter 5
Cytokine andAnti-Cytokine Agents asFuture Therapeutics forFibrostenosing IBD
NoamJacob, StephanR.Targan, andDavidQ.Shih
Abstract The pathogenesis of stricture formation in inammatory bowel disease is
a complex process with a wide variety of clinical, genetic, epigenetic, and environ­mental risk factors. Originally thought to be a consequence of chronic inamma­tion, new evidence arises for non-inammatory contributors to stricture formation, suggesting an intricate interplay of cellular, molecular, and additional host/environ­mental factors. Although no specic medical treatments for brostenotic intestinal strictures currently exist, understanding the molecular pathways involved in stric­ture formation will undoubtedly guide therapeutic developments. As mediators of inammation and immunoregulation, cytokines are key effectors in the brotic pro­cess. Accordingly, targeting inammation, in part via cytokine blockade, has been the mainstay of therapy in IBD.In many cases, inammatory disease is associated with signicant brotic change, as increased inammation perpetuates the cascade of mucosal repair. Thus, inammatory cytokine-targeted therapy may serve as one potential avenue for treating brostenosis. As regulatory and repair mechanisms have been implicated in brosis as well, either as sequelae of inammation or via de novo pathways, a parallel route for treating intestinal brosis may be the targeting of “regulatory” cytokines. This chapter will highlight the relevant contributions and potential therapeutic targeting of cytokines involved in inammatory and regulatory pathways leading to brosis.
Keywords Inammatory bowel disease · Strictures · Crohn’s disease · Ulcerative colitis · Fibrostenosis
N. Jacob F.Widjaja Foundation, Inammatory Bowel and Immunobiology Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Vatche and Tamar Manoukian, Division of Digestive Diseases, Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA e-mail: njacob@mednet.ucla.edu
S. R. Targan · D. Q. Shih ( F.Widjaja Foundation, Inammatory Bowel and Immunobiology Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA e-mail: Stephan.Targan@cshs.org; david.shih@csmc.edu
F. Rieder (ed.), Fibrostenotic Inammatory Bowel Disease,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90578-5_5
*)
59© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018
60
N. Jacob et al.

5.1 Introduction

Approximately 40% of CD patients with ileal disease will develop clinically appar­ent strictures throughout their lifetime [1]. The frequency of brostenosing compli­cations has still remained signicant despite immunosuppressive therapy in CD patients in the form of steroids or immunomodulators [2, 3]. Since a myriad of genetic and epigenetic variables are thought to contribute to brostenosing disease, including those that affect cytokine biology, the investigation of specic therapeu­tics targeting those pathways has become prevalent. The potential adverse effects of inhibiting pathways involved in tissue repair and mucosal healing, as well as the relatively slow evolution of brosis in CD has made precise targeting of brosis difcult. Despite these potential deterrents, cytokine-targeted therapy has become the pillar of treatment for many inammatory conditions and is being evaluated for brotic disorders. The question of whether anti-cytokine therapy will prove useful for intestinal brosis still remains, however. This chapter will review current cyto­kines involved in brosis and their potential targeting for treatment.
5.2 “Inammatory” Cytokines
Targeting inammation has been the mainstay of therapy in IBD.As such, anti­inammatory cytokine therapeutics have provided signicant advances in treating IBD patients. In many cases, inammatory disease is associated with signicant brotic change, as increased inammation perpetuates the cascade of mucosal repair. Thus, since brogenesis may be a consequence of increasing inammation, the hope of treating resulting brosis by preventing and suppressing inammatory insults has emerged.

5.2.1 TNFα

TNFα is a multifunctional cytokine, often considered proinammatory (but with important immunomodulatory properties, as well). A variety of cell types can secrete TNFα, including activated macrophages, B cells, T cells, keratinocytes, and broblasts. Depending upon the conditions, TNFα can trigger either pro­inammatory or anti-inammatory pathways by engaging one or both of two dis­tinct transmembrane receptors: TNF-Receptor 1, and TNF-Receptor 2. In addition to its pro-inammatory effects, TNFα may potentiate brosis via induction of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1) and reduce MMP-2 activity and collagen degradation [4]. Treatments targeting TNFα are some of the most widely used anti­cytokine therapies for inammatory disorders, but mixed evidence has surfaced for using these agents in pro-brotic diseases. In some animal models of liver and renal