Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_1267_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
15 Мб
Скачать
☆
7 Fat andFibrosis
103
communication). These preliminary ndings support the development of a multi­centre randomized international trial in CD, comparing outcomes between groups that undergo conventional resection versus one where the mesentery is included [17].
The mesentery is not usually inamed in true mucosal UC, where disease is mostly mucosal. This is not to say that the mesentery does not have a pathobiologi­cal role in this condition. Increasing evidence points to key immunological activities within mesenteric lymph nodes and increasingly data is emerging pointing to a rela­tionship between immunological events in mesenteric nodes (cellular and molecular events), and mucosal events in nearby contiguous intestinal mucosa. Notwithstanding this, the mesentery in uncomplicated MUC (when a perforation has not occurred) appears normal at macroscopic and histological levels. This helps in its differentia­tion from CD.
As relatively little is known regarding the mesentery in CD, there is a paucity of data on mesenteric cellular events. It is known that mesenteric adipocytes produce substantial amounts of TNF-α and CRP [21, 27]. Takahashi et al. recently showed that interactions between intestinal epithelia and adipocytes can induce inammatory- type responses in an autonomous fashion, i.e. they do not require immunologic inputs to do so [29]. It is suggested that brocytes may also play a role. These have the capacity to differentiate into either adipocyte or broblast [30]. Until recently the origin of cells responsible for mesenchymal changes found in CD was unknown. Emerging data suggest that brocytes exploit the mesenteric platform to gain access to the intestinal surface [11, 30]. At the serosal side of the intestinal wall they use the connective tissue continuity between mesentery and intestine to access deeper intestinal layers. Fibrocyte tracking along intestine-mesenteric mesenchyme could explain many aspects of Crohn’s disease (including transmural and trans-mesenteric disease manifesta­tions) [1, 11].
7.3 Creeping Fat andStrictures
Although emerging data support a role for creeping fat in the pathogenesis of intes­tinal inammation, there are very limited data linking creeping fat to intestinal brosis. Early data from macroscopic ndings indicates that the presence of creep­ing fat is associated with muscularis propria hyperplasia and clinically apparent stricturing disease [31]. In a study investigating 20 patients undergoing ileal resec­tion for CD and 20 normal controls, serosal fat wrapping was present in all cases. The extent of fat wrapping correlated signicantly with the degree of chronic inammation [31]. In a consecutive and unselected group of 27 intestinal resections performed on 25 patients with Crohn’s disease conrmed by histology, fat- wrapping was identied in 12 of 16 ileal resections and in seven of 11 large bowel resections. It correlated with transmural inammation, and there was a signicant relationship between fat-wrapping and other connective tissue changes, including brosis,
104
muscular hypertrophy and stricture formation [32]. These ndings suggest that serosal connective tissue changes including fat wrapping in CD are related to local effects of underlying chronic inammatory inltrates including brosis.
R. Mao and J. CalvinCoffey
7.4 Potential Mechanisms ofFat Inuencing Fibrosis/
Smooth Muscle Cell Hyperplasia inOrgans other thantheGut
Although data from macroscopic ndings showed the presence of creeping fat is associated with muscularis propria hyperplasia and clinically apparent stricturing disease [31], there is essentially no data explaining this phenomenon. However, data from brosis in other organs could provide clues to address the fundamental knowl­edge gap about the mechanistic role of distinct components of creeping fat in intes­tinal brosis.
7.4.1 Cardiac Fat andFibrosis
The adipocyte-derived hormone leptin may induce cardiac brosis by promot­ing endothelial dysfunction, m-TOR pathway activation and oxidative stress [33, 34]. Recently, data are accumulating pointing to an association between pericardial fat and occurrence of atrial brillation (AF). In atrial brillation atrial myocardial brosis appears to be prominent and may lead to functional abnormalities [35]. In the Framingham Heart cohort study, pericardial fat vol­ume was an independent predictor of AF development even after adjusting other AF risk factors [36].
As occurs in the case of creeping fat in Crohn’s disease, epicardial fat (EAT) occurs between visceral pericardium and epicardium in direct contact with adjacent myocardium. As a result of direct contact, there is no anatomical or histological bar­rier that may prevent crosstalk between epicardial fat and adjacent muscle [37]. The secretome of human EAT obtained from patients undergoing coronary bypass sur­gery, but not from subcutaneous fat (SAT), rapidly leads to increased brosis in atrial organo-culture [37]. Among the adipo-brokines secreted by EAT, activin A (a member of the TGF-β superfamily) may be an important mediator of this pro- brotic effect. Indeed, supplementation of culture media with recombinant human activin A enhanced brotic events whilst anti-activin A antibody neutralized these. Histological analyses of human myocardium has identied brosis at the interface between adipose and myocardial tissues. Interstitial brosis of the neigh­boring myocardium was often marked in these studies [37].
Pangenomic transcriptomic studies identify a specic transcriptomic signature in human EAT compared with SAT.EAT includes peri-atrial, peri-ventricular and peri­coronary fat. Over 400 genes are commonly expressed across these fat depots.
7 Fat andFibrosis
Amongst these are genes involved in extracellular matrix remodeling (associated with collagen IV, VI, thrombospondin 3, laminin alpha 2, bronectin 1 genes), inammation and thrombosis [38].
105
7.4.2 Infrapatellar Fat Pad andOsteoarthritis (OA)
The effects of local adipose tissue on nearby joints has also come under the spotlight in the recent past. Eymard et al. [39] showed that intra-articular adipose tissues (IAATs) have a distinct histological phenotype compared with subcutaneous adi­pose tissue. Fibrosis and vascularity are increased in all IAAs compared with SAT.IAATs adipocytes are smaller in size compared with subcutaneous counter­parts. Differential expression of genes involved in developmental signalling, lipid handling and general metabolism is apparent when IAAT and SAT are compared. IAATs secret more IL-6, IL-8 and prostaglandin E2 compared with SAT.
The infrapatellar fat pad (IFP), located in the knee joint, is an intra-capsular and extrasynovial structure. Barboza etal. [40] noted prominent brosis in this fat depot. Mice fed a high-fat diet for 20 weeks develop osteophytes and early structural changes in cartilage. Obesity-associated changes in IFP tissue are associated with increased expression of genes involved in brosis and extracelluar matrix production.
7.4.3 Perivascular Fat andAtherosclerosis
Perivascular fat (PVAT) is directly contiguous with vascular adventitia. It has been suggested PVAT may exert a pathobiological effect in atherosclerosis development and that this is facilitated by contiguity between PVAT and blood vessel [41]. PVAT plays an important role inlocal vascular homeostasis. Factors released from PVAT may contribute to inammation, smooth muscle proliferation, and promote athero­sclerotic or neointimal lesion growth [42]. Findings in rodent models show that aging and diet-induced obesity enhance the ability of PVAT to stimulate prolifera­tion of human smooth muscle cells [43].
7.4.4 Creeping Fat andIntestinal Fibrosis inCD
Within creeping fat, activated adipose tissue lies in close proximity to both adipose derived stromal tissue and immune effector cells. This histological relationship (incombination with the fact that activated adipose tissue secretes a spectrum of fatty acids, adipokines and cytokines) plays a role in shaping local immune responses in nearby intestinal mucosa. The adipocyte-rich microenvironment within the
106
R. Mao and J. CalvinCoffey
creeping fat directs the local macrophage compartment to the M2 subtype. These cells in turn have an important pro-brotic role mediated in part through their pro­duction of pro-brotic factors such as TGF-β [44, 45]. Rieder et al. [46] recently reported that creeping fat derived mediators such as free fatty acids (FFA), but not adipokines, induce a differential and selective brogenic response by human intes­tinal broblasts (HIF) and human intestinal muscle cells (HIMC) as demonstrated by increases in matrix secretion, IL-6 production, α-SMA expression and cell migration. Interestingly, bFGF and FFA synergistically increased HIF and HIMC proliferation in a p38MAPK-dependent but NFkB- and MyD88-independent man­ner. Moreover, results show that ECM released by activated HIMC selectively and specically promotes migration of adipocytes (Ad) and pre-adipocytes (Pre-Ad). This could provide a molecular basis for the advancement of mesenteric fat along the surface of the intestine (i.e. creeping fat). Adipocytes and their precursors expressed integrins α1, 2, 4 and αV as well as integrins β1 and αVβ5. Blockade of integrin β1inhibited the increased adipocyte and pre-adipocyte migration induced by ECM.Combined, these ndings point to a feedback loop between mesenteric fat and intestinal muscle that could explain the association between creeping fat and stricture formation in CD.Challenges in this eld include the the lack of high del­ity animal models.

7.5 Future Outlook

Fat to mesenchymal interactions appear to be a critical driver of tissue remodeling in multiple organs, including the intestine. Future studies should focus on specic features of CD that are strongly associated with changes in the mesentery, i.e. creeping fat, axial polarity, transmural inammation and mesenteric shortening [30]. Special emphasis should be put on the zone of intersection between the mesentery and the intestine. Although this region is a least two meters in length, it is remarkably understudied in general [47, 48]. Additionally, the area of transi­tion between creeping fat and the serosal surface not affected by creeping fat should be examined as it may provide direct clues about the effect of fat on intes­tinal smooth muscle. Novel animal models are necessary to elucidate mechanisms of creeping fat formation or fat to mesenchymal interactions invivo. This in com­bination with human exvivo culture systems could yield novel medical therapies in this eld.
Future diagnostic studies could exploit the relationship between the mesentery and intestine by determining the appearance of the mesentery on cross sectional imaging [48]. As mesenteric abnormalities are largely pathognomonic of Crohn’s disease, then it is likely that imaging approaches evaluating the mesentery will provide important diagnostic information. Endoluminal approaches (combining radiological and endoscopic technologies) are likely to generate the highest yields [47, 48].
7 Fat andFibrosis
107
At present, surgery continues to be reserved for patients in whom medical treat­ment fails to control symptoms, or who develop complications of IBD.The prom­ising results obtained in studies in which the mesentery was also included during resection prompt the question as to whether surgery (and mesenteric resection) should be introduced earlier in the management of IBD.This was not the case in the past as complication rates following surgery were too high. However, recent clarication of mesenteric anatomy has enabled a comprehensive standardization of colorectal surgery, which in turn could facilitate the earlier introduction of mesenteric-based resectional surgery [26, 49, 50]. Mesenteric resection should also be further evaluated through randomized, double blinded and multi­institutional studies.
In tandem with the above studies, investigation should be led into developing new pharmacotherapeutic (i.e. non-operative) approaches to IBD, using fat targeted therapy. These would be greatly facilitated by the development of animal models that mimic the relationship between the mesentery and intestine in IBD, with a high level of translatability. Any such model should reproduce the connective tissue continuity that occurs between the intestine and mesentery and the cellular (i.e. brocyte-based) and molecular events that lead to mesenchymal abnormalities.

References

1. Coffey JC, etal. The mesentery in Crohn’s disease: friend or foe? Curr Opin Gastroenterol.
2016;32(4):267–73.
2. Burke JP, etal. National trends in intestinal resection for Crohn’s disease in the post-biologic
era. Int J Color Dis. 2013;28(10):1401–6.
3. de Buck van Overstraeten A, etal. Short- and medium-term outcomes following primary ileo-
caecal resection for Crohn’s disease in two specialist centres. Br J Surg. 2017;104:1713.
4. Crohn BB, Ginzburg L, Oppenheimer GD. Landmark article Oct 15, 1932. Regional ile-
itis. A pathological and clinical entity. By Burril B. Crohn, Leon Ginzburg, and Gordon D.Oppenheimer. JAMA. 1984;251(1):73–9.
5. Galeone C, etal. Crohn’s disease in Italy: a critical review of the literature using different data
sources. Dig Liver Dis. 2017;49(5):459–66.
6. Bernstein CN, et al. Epidemiology of Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis in a central
Canadian province: a population-based study. Am J Epidemiol. 1999;149(10):916–24.
7. Bernstein CN, etal. A review of mortality and surgery in ulcerative colitis: milestones of the
seriousness of the disease. Inamm Bowel Dis. 2013;19(9):2001–10.
8. Jeuring SF, etal. Disease outcome of ulcerative colitis in an era of changing treatment strategies:
results from the Dutch population-based IBDSL cohort. J Crohns Colitis. 2015;9(10):837–45.
9. Abou Khalil M, etal. Incidence rates and predictors of colectomy for ulcerative colitis in the
era of biologics: results from a provincial database. J Gastrointest Surg. 2017;22:124.
10. Coffey JC, Sehgal R, Jarrar A, Soop M. Mesenteric physiology. In: Coffey JC, editor.
Mesenteric principles of gastrointestinal surgery: basic and applied science. Boca Raton: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group; 2017. p.69–84.
11. Coffey JC, Roddy J, Kiernan M, Sahebally S.Pathology of the mesentery. In: Coffey JC, edi-
tor. Mesenteric principles of gastrointestinal surgery: basic and applied science. Boca Raton: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group; 2017. p.85–108.
108
12. Karlis J, etal. Characterization of colonic and mesenteric lymph node dendritic cell subpopu-
lations in a murine adoptive transfer model of inammatory bowel disease. Inamm Bowel Dis. 2004;10(6):834–47.
13. Sakuraba A, etal. Th1/Th17 immune response is induced by mesenteric lymph node dendritic
cells in Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology. 2009;137(5):1736–45.
14. Coffey JC, Dockery P, Moran BJ, Heald B. Mesenteric and peritoneal anatomy. In: Coffey
JC, editor. Mesenteric principles of gastrointestinal surgery: basic and applied science. Boca Raton: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group; 2017. p.11–40.
15. Coffey JC. 7 billion and counting- the Msentery. In: TEDx– Ha’Penny Bridge. Dublin: TEDx.
2017.
16. Li Y, etal. Letter: Is visceral adiposity index a predictor of liver histology in patients with non-
alcoholic fatty liver disease? Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013;37(5):583.
17. Li Y, et al. The role of the mesentery in Crohn’s disease. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol.
2017;2(4):244–5.
18. Nakahigashi M, Yamamoto T.Anti-inammatory effects of enteral nutrition on mesentery fat
in patients with Crohn’s disease. Clin Nutr. 2015;34(1):165.
19. Schafer A, Herfath H. Creepiong fat in Crohn’s disease: travelling in a creeper lane of
research? Gut. 2005;54:742–3.
20. Desmreumaux P, Ernst O, Geboes K, etal. Inammatory alterations in mesenteric adipose tis-
sue in Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology. 1999;117:73–81.
21. Kredel LI, Siegmund B. Adipose-tissue and intestinal inammation - visceral obesity and
creeping fat. Front Immunol. 2014;5:1–12.
22. Coffey JC, Sehgal R, Knol J.Embryological development of the mesentery, peritoneal reec-
tion and Toldt’s fascia. In: Coffey JC, editor. Mesenteric principles of gastrointestinal surgery: basic and applied sciences. Boca Raton: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group; 2017. p.41–6.
23. Coffey JC, Kiernan M, Walsh LG.Histology of the mesentery. In: Coffey JC, editor. Mesenteric
principles of gastrointestinal surgery: basic and applied science. Boca Raton: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group; 2017. p.47–56.
24. Culligan K, etal. A detailed appraisal of mesocolic lymphangiology—an immunohistochemi-
cal and stereological analysis. J Anat. 2014;225(4):463–72.
25. Culligan K, etal. The mesocolon: a histological and electron microscopic characterization
of the mesenteric attachment of the colon prior to and after surgical mobilization. Ann Surg. 2014;260(6):1048–56.
26. Coffey JC, etal. Terminology and nomenclature in colonic surgery: universal application
of a rule-based approach derived from updates on mesenteric anatomy. Tech Coloproctol. 2014;18(9):789–94.
27. Kruis T, Batra A, Siegmund B.Bacterial translocation- impact on the adipocyte compartment.
Front Immunol. 2014;4(1):510.
28. Li Y, etal. The role of the mesentery in Crohn’s disease: the contributions of nerves, ves-
sels, lymphatics, and fat to the pathogenesis and disease course. Inamm Bowel Dis. 2016;22(6):1483–95.
29. Takahashi Y, et al. Reciprocal inammatory signaling between intestinal epithelial cells and
adipocytes in the absence of immune cells. EBioMedicine. 2017;23:34.
30. Sahebally SM, et al. Circulating brocytes and Crohn’s disease. Br J Surg. 2013;100(12):
1549–56.
31. Borley NR, etal. The relationship between inammatory and serosal connective tissue changes
in ileal Crohn’s disease: evidence for a possible causative link. J Pathol. 2000;190(2):196–202.
32. Sheehan AL, etal. Fat-wrapping in Crohn’s disease: pathological basis and relevance to surgi-
cal practice. Br J Surg. 1992;79(9):955–8.
33. Huby AC, etal. Adipocyte-derived hormone leptin is a direct regulator of aldosterone secretion,
which promotes endothelial dysfunction and cardiac brosis. Circulation. 2015;132(22):2134–45.
34. Hatem SN, Redheuil A, Gandjbakhch E.Cardiac adipose tissue and atrial brillation: the perils
of adiposity. Cardiovasc Res. 2016;109(4):502–9.
R. Mao and J. CalvinCoffey
7 Fat andFibrosis
35. Spach MS, Dolber PC. Relating extracellular potentials and their derivatives to anisotropic
propagation at a microscopic level in human cardiac muscle. Evidence for electrical uncou­pling of side-to-side ber connections with increasing age. Circ Res. 1986;58(3):356–71.
36. Thanassoulis G, et al. Pericardial fat is associated with prevalent atrial brillation: the
Framingham Heart Study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2010;3(4):345–50.
37. Venteclef N, etal. Human epicardial adipose tissue induces brosis of the atrial myocardium
through the secretion of adipo-brokines. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(13):795–805.
38. Gaborit B, et al. Human epicardial adipose tissue has a specic transcriptomic signature
depending on its anatomical peri-atrial, peri-ventricular, or peri-coronary location. Cardiovasc Res. 2015;108(1):62–73.
39. Eymard F, etal. Knee and hip intra-articular adipose tissues (IAATs) compared with autolo-
gous subcutaneous adipose tissue: a specic phenotype for a central player in osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76(6):1142–8.
40. Barboza E, etal. Probrotic infrapatellar fat pad remodeling without M1 macrophage polar-
ization precedes knee osteoarthritis in mice with diet-induced obesity. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017;69(6):1221–32.
41. van Dam AD, etal. Targeting white, brown and perivascular adipose tissue in atherosclerosis
development. Eur J Pharmacol. 2017;816:82.
42. Schafer K, Drosos I, Konstantinides S.Perivascular adipose tissue: epiphenomenon or local
risk factor? Int J Obes. 2017;41:1311.
43. Barandier C, Montani JP, Yang Z.Mature adipocytes and perivascular adipose tissue stimulate
vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation: effects of aging and obesity. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2005;289(5):H1807–13.
44. Kredel LI, et al. Adipokines from local fat cells shape the macrophage compartment of the
creeping fat in Crohn’s disease. Gut. 2013;62(6):852–62.
45. Vernon MA, Mylonas KJ, Hughes J. Macrophages and renal brosis. Semin Nephrol.
2010;30(3):302–17.
46. Rieder F, Doyon G, Ouyang Z, West G, Fiocchi C. Adipocyte and preadipocyte derived-
mediators induce a pro-brogenic phenotype in human intestinal mesenchymal cells- a novel link between fat and intestinal brosis. AGA abstract 573. Gastroenterology. 2014;146:S-106.
47. Coffey JC, O’Leary DP. The mesentery: structure, function, and role in disease. Lancet
Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;1(3):238–47.
48. Coffey JC, O’Leary DP. Dening the mesentery as an organ and what this means for under-
standing its roles in digestive disorders. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;11(8):703–5.
49. Coffey JC, Heald B, Moran BJ.Operative nomenclature. In: Coffey JC, editor. Mesenteric
principles of gastrointestinal surgery: basic and applied science. Boca Raton: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group; 2017. p.119–36.
50. Coffey JC, Dockery P. Colorectal cancer: surgery for colorectal cancer - standardization
required. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;13(5):256–7.
109
Chapter 8
Environmental Factors andTheir Inuence onIntestinal Fibrosis
ClaudioBernardazzi, FernandoCastro, andHeitorS.de Souza
Abstract Multiple endogenous and exogenous factors have been implicated in the
development of inammatory bowel disease (IBD), comprising Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis; these factors may initiate and maintain the chronic inammatory process, potentially resulting in intestinal brosis. Several distinct mechanisms are involved in the tissue response leading to excessive extracellular matrix deposition in IBD.This process involves the complex and dynamic interactions of a network of several genes and molecules, forming a microenvironment that favors the develop­ment of brosis. In addition to inammation, alternate contributors have been impli­cated in intestinal brogenesis, including microbiota and the action of microbe-associated molecular patterns and other pattern recognition receptors, as well as damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), dietary factors, and natu­ral and synthetic compounds. These elements have been shown to act directly or through epigenetic changes, usually interfering with the immune response and mechanisms of tissue repair, which may ultimately cause brosis. Further investiga­tion of specic environmental triggers and the epigenetic molecular network under­lying the pathogenesis of IBD may help in the prevention of and in the development of a more effective treatment for intestinal brosis.
Keywords Inammatory bowel disease · Environmental factors · Intestinal brosis · DAMPs · Epigenetics · Intestinal microbiota
C. Bernardazzi · F. Castro Serviço de Gastroenterologia e Laboratório Multidisciplinar de Pesquisa, Departamento de Clínica Médica, Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
H. S. de Souza ( Serviço de Gastroenterologia e Laboratório Multidisciplinar de Pesquisa, Departamento de Clínica Médica, Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
D’Or Institute for Research and Education, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
F. Rieder (ed.), Fibrostenotic Inammatory Bowel Disease,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90578-5_8
*)
111© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018
112
C. Bernardazzi et al.

8.1 Introduction

Inammatory bowel disease (IBD), comprising Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), represents a group of chronic and potentially progressive and destruc­tive diseases primarily affecting the gastrointestinal tract. Currently, these complex diseases are believed to originate from an inappropriate response of the mucosal immune system to the commensal intestinal microbiota in a genetically susceptible individual [1]. Notwithstanding positive developments in modern therapy for IBD, there is still an unmet need for better medical treatments, particularly regarding chronic complications such as brosis.
Several factors have been implicated in the development of IBD, such as genetic background, smoking, indiscriminate use of medications, dietary habits, and bacte­rial infection; these factors may trigger and sustain chronic inammation and ulti­mately result in the development of intestinal brosis [2]. Considered as a consequence of the excessive production of extracellular matrix (ECM) by activated mesenchymal cells, intestinal brosis often results in intestinal obstruction in the context of IBD, particularly among patients with CD [3].
8.2 Environmental Factors Contributing totheDevelopment
ofIntestinal Fibrosis
Intestinal damage and repair involve multiple mechanisms that converge in the recruitment of mesenchymal cells and the generation of activated myobroblasts, resulting in excessive ECM deposition. Excessive ECM deposition is caused by an imbalance between MMPs and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinase, resulting in brosis [4]. These abnormalities are, in great part, thought to result from the action of several mediators that control ECM deposition [5]. Although the inammatory process is a major activator of mesenchymal cells, these cells can also be activated by other pathways, such as microbe-associated molecular patterns and other pattern recognition receptors, autocrine and paracrine signals, and damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) [6, 7]. Despite the relative improvement in the control of intestinal inammation achieved in recent years, especially after the advent of biologic therapy, brosis continues to represent an important medical problem, fre­quently requiring surgery.

8.2.1 Smoking

Although the exact mechanism by which tobacco is involved in intestinal inam­mation is not clear, smoking is a well-known inuential factor in IBD, usually worsening CD, but offering relative protection from UC [8]. Cigarettes are
8 Environmental Factors andTheir Inuence onIntestinal Fibrosis
113
composed of several chemical elements, some of which have been shown to affect different targets by acting on DNA through epigenetic inuences in the intestinal cells and even by modulating the microbiota in the intestinal lumen [9, 10]. From a clinical perspective, a recent study addressing the impact of smoking in IBD identi­ed an increased risk of surgery among current smokers with CD, while former smokers with UC have an increased risk of colectomy [11]. On the other hand, another recent study involving the Sydney IBD Cohort database conrmed the det­rimental effects of smoking in CD but failed to demonstrate substantial benets from smoking in UC [12]. Interestingly, in a recent study, investigators analyzed the association between cigarette smoking and pancreatic brosis and concluded that aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) ligands found in cigarette smoke increase the severity of pancreatic brosis in an experimental model of chronic pancreatitis in mice through the up-regulation of IL-22. In addition, in humans, higher levels of IL-22 have been identied in serum samples from smokers compared to nonsmok­ers [13]. AhR activation has been shown to deliver anti-inammatory signals dependent on the induction of regulatory T cells [14] and to promote IL-22 produc­tion by Th17, Th22 and gamma-delta T cells [15]. In the context of CD, the low expression of AhR found in lamina propria mononuclear cells [16] has recently been associated with elevated levels of Smad7, an inhibitor of transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-beta 1) activity, which in turn regulates AhR expression [17]. Although the exact mechanism by which smoking affects mucosal immunity is yet to be determined, abnormal signaling mediated by AhR may represent a potential link between the environment and the consequences of inammation, including brogenesis.
8.2.2 The Inuence ofDiet
In recent decades, the way food is prepared and offered has progressively changed, and the consumption of processed foods, high in fat and sugar and with large amounts of salt, has increased. In addition to the increased risk of cardiovascular diseases, diabetes and obesity, the widespread consumption of Western-like diets decient in ber and micronutrients but frequently containing articial additives has been shown to affect the intestinal microbiota [18] and has been associated with the development of intestinal diseases, including IBD and colorectal cancer [19–21].
A variety of luminal elements, such as dietary components, interact with epithe­lial cells to cause pro- or anti-inammatory responses, which are usually mediated by cell surface receptors. The interplay between cigarette smoking and immune cells, previously discussed in this chapter, has been attributed to abnormal AhR activation, for example. After the discovery that several natural and synthetic ligands can activate AhR, including environmental, dietary, and endogenous aromatic com­pounds [22], this transcription factor has become a target of major interest in research because it constitutes a potential connection between the environment and