Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5632_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Foreword
- •Preface
- •About the Book
- •Contents
- •1.2.3 Ceramic Biomaterials
- •1.2.4 Composite Biomaterials
- •1.2.5 Nanocellulose
- •1.3.1 Biocompatible Proteins
- •1: Sustainable Green Biomaterials in Drug Delivery
- •1.1 Introduction
- •1.2 Classification
- •1.2.1 Metallic Biomaterials
- •1.2.2 Polymeric Biomaterials
- •1.3.2 Composites (Cellulose, Chitosan, and Chitin)
- •1.3.3 Hydroxyapatite-Starch Based Biomaterials
- •1.3.4 Carbonaceous Materials
- •1.4 Perspective
- •1.4.1 Current Recycling Strategies
- •1.4.2 Dental and Orthopedic Implants
- •1.4.3 Medical Plastic Waste
- •1.4.4 Sterilization and Reusability
- •1.4.5 Waste Management for Recycling
- •1.5 Conclusion and Future Challenges
- •References
- •2: Prospects of Biodegradable Material: Sustainable and Patient-Centric Approach in the Realm of Biomedical Engineering
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.2 Sustainable Green Biomaterials
- •2.2.1 Naturally Derived Polymers and Polymer Substrates
- •2.2.1.1 Protein Based Sustainable Biomaterials
- •2.2.1.2 Polysaccharides Based Sustainable Biomaterials
- •2.2.1.3 Hydroxyapatite Based Sustainable Biomaterials
- •2.2.1.4 Carbonaceous Sustainable Biomaterials
- •2.2.2 Synthetic Polymer Substrate
- •2.2.3 Biodegradable Metal Substrates
- •2.4 Bio-degradable Piezoelectrics for Medical Implants
- •2.5.1 Wound Healing
- •2.5.2 Drug Delivery Systems
- •2.5.2.1 Nano-based Drug Delivery Systems
- •2.5.2.2 Polymeric Nanoparticles
- •2.5.2.3 Solid-Lipid Nanoparticles (SLNs)
- •2.5.2.4 Liposomes
- •2.5.3 Medical Devices
- •2.5.3.1 Implants
- •2.5.3.2 Other Applications
- •2.7 Prospects and Conclusion
- •References
- •3: Strategies in Synthesis of Biodegradable Polymers
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2 Natural Biopolymers
- •3.2.1 Polysaccharides
- •3.2.2 Polynucleotide
- •3.2.3 Polypeptides
- •3.3 Chemically Synthesized Biodegradable Polymers
- •3.3.1 Extraction Methods of Biodegradable Polymers
- •3.3.2 Polymerization of Biodegradable Polymers
- •3.3.3 Fermentation Method of Biodegradable Polymers
- •3.3.4 Sonosynthesis of Biodegradable Polymers
- •3.3.5 Solvent Casting Method of Biodegradable Polymers
- •3.3.6 Electrospinning Method
- •References
- •4: Probiotic Bacterial Cellulose: A Bio-mediated Nanomaterial for Health Care Applications
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.2 Probiotic Bacterial Cellulose and Bacterial Cellulose
- •4.3 Producers of Bacterial Cellulose
- •4.3.1 Process of Bacterial Cellulose Synthesis
- •4.4 Probiotic Bacteria and Their Beneficial Effects
- •4.5 Methods of Synthesizing Probiotic Bacterial Cellulose
- •4.6 Healthcare Applications of Probiotic Bacterial Cellulose
- •4.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •5: 3D Printing and 4D Printing: Sustainable Manufacturing Techniques for Green Biomaterials
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.2 Fundamentals of 3D and 4D Bioprinting
- •5.3 Biomaterials in 3D Bioprinting
- •5.3.1 Types of Polymers Used in 3D Bioprinting (Fig. 5.1)
- •5.3.1.1 Synthetic Polymers
- •Polylactic Acid (PLA)
- •Polyethylene Glycol (PEG)
- •5.4 Polyglycolic Acid (PGA)
- •5.5 Sustainability in 3D Printing
- •5.5.1 What Makes your Biomaterial more Sustainable?
- •5.6 Advancements in 4D Bioprinting
- •5.6.1 Smart Polymers
- •5.6.2 Applications of 4D Bio-Printing in Sustainable Manufacturing
- •5.7 Case Studies on 3D and 4D Bioprinting
- •5.8 Challenges and Future Directions in 3D and 4D Bioprinting
- •5.8.1 The Technical Challenges in 3D Bio-Printing Include
- •5.8.2 Challenges in 4D Bio-Printing
- •5.8.3 Future Directions
- •5.9 Conclusion
- •References
- •6: Proteins as Biocompatible Material for Biomedical Applications
- •6.2.6 Zein
- •6.3 Proteins as Adaptable and Biocompatible Building Blocks for Biomedical Applications in Biomaterials
- •6.4.1 Protein-Based Particle Systems
- •6.1 Introduction
- •6.2 Protein Materials
- •6.2.1 Keratin
- •6.2.2 Collagen
- •6.2.3 Elastin
- •6.2.4 Silk
- •6.2.5 Resilin
- •6.4.2 Protein-Based Hydrogels
- •6.4.3 Protein-Based Films
- •6.4.4 Protein Electrospun Fibers
- •6.4.5 Protein-Based Microneedles
- •6.4.6 Keratin Composites
- •6.4.7 Elastin Composites
- •6.4.8 Collagen Composites
- •6.5.1 Bone Healing
- •6.5.2 Antibiotic Release
- •6.5.3 Diabetes
- •6.5.4 Cancer Treatment
- •6.5.5 Neuroinflammation
- •6.5.6 Wound Healing
- •6.5.7 Corneal Regeneration
- •6.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •7: Graphene-Based Carbonaceous Materials: A Sustainable Biomaterial for Biomedical Application
- •7.1 Introduction
- •7.2 Graphene and Its Family
- •7.2.1 Structure of Graphene
- •7.2.2 Properties of Graphene-Based Biomaterials
- •7.2.3 Synthesis of Graphene Compounds
- •7.2.4 Applications of Graphene Compounds
- •7.3 Carbonaceous Materials in Biomedical Applications
- •7.3.1 Tissue Engineering
- •7.3.2 Biosensing
- •7.3.3 Drug Delivery
- •7.3.4 Smart Biomaterials
- •7.4 Biomaterials and Sustainability
- •7.4.1 Sustainability in Graphene-Based Materials
- •References
- •8: Green Approach for Synthesizing Silk Fibroin Biomaterial Scaffolds
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.3.1 Green Alternatives for Degumming
- •8.3.2 Green Alternative to Dissolution Techniques
- •8.3.3 Green Alternative to Fabrication Techniques
- •8.5 Applications of Silk Fibroin Biomaterial Scaffolds
- •8.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •9: Green Catalysts in the Synthesis of Biomaterials for Biomedical Applications
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.2 Green Catalyst and Its Classification
- •9.2.1 Green Catalyst from the Light Source
- •9.2.2 Green Catalyst from Bio Source
- •9.2.3 Green Catalyst from Nanotechnology
- •9.2.4 Green Catalyst from Heteropolyacids
- •9.3 Biomedical Applications
- •9.3.1 Drug Delivery
- •9.3.2 Polymer Coating
- •9.3.3 Biosensor
- •9.3.4 Tissue Engineering
- •9.3.5 Wound Healing
- •9.3.6 Bioprinting
- •9.4 Methods Involved in the Synthesis of Green Catalyst
- •9.4.1 Green Solvent Synthesis Method of Catalyst
- •9.4.2 Biosynthesis Method of Catalyst
- •9.4.3 Electrochemical Synthesis Method of Catalyst
- •9.4.4 Plasma Method
- •9.4.5 Ultrasonic-Aided Synthesis
- •9.4.6 Microwave-Aided Synthesis (MAS)
- •9.4.7 Alternative Green Methods
- •9.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •10: Utilisation of Plant Extracts for Green Synthesis of Metallic Nanoparticles
- •10.1 Introduction
- •10.1.1 Silver Oxide Nanoparticles
- •10.1.2 Synthesis of Gold Nanoparticles
- •10.1.3 Synthesis Iron Oxide Nanoparticles
- •10.1.4 Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles
- •10.1.5 Zinc Oxide Nanoparticle
- •10.1.6 Copper Oxide Nanoparticle
- •10.1.7 Palladium Nanoparticles
- •10.2 Conclusion
- •References
- •11.1 Introduction
- •11.3 Sustainable Synthesis of Metal Nanoparticles Using Waste
- •11.3.1 Agri-Wastes
- •11.3.2 E-Wastes
- •11.3.3 Industrial-Wastes
- •11.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •12: Metal Framework in Biosensor
- •12.1 Introduction
- •12.2 Synthesis of MOFs
- •12.3 Sensors
- •12.3.1 Various Types of Biosensors
- •12.3.1.1 Electrochemical Biosensors
- •12.3.1.2 Amperometric and Voltammetric Immunosensor
- •12.3.1.3 Electrochemiluminescence (ECL) Biosensor
- •12.3.1.4 Aptamers
- •12.3.1.5 Field-Effect-Transistor-Based Sensors (FET)
- •12.3.1.6 MOF-Nanomaterials-Based Biosensors
- •12.3.1.7 Food Quality Monitoring
- •12.3.1.8 Environmental Analysis
- •12.3.1.9 Pesticide
- •12.3.1.10 Gas Sensors
- •12.3.1.11 Temperature Sensor
- •12.4 Diagnosis of Diseases
- •12.4.1 Cancer
- •12.4.2 Glucose Sensor
- •12.4.4 HIV Sensor
- •12.4.5 MOF Used for Optical Sensors
- •12.5 Conclusion and Future Perspective
- •References
- •13: Cellulose, Chitin, and Chitosan Composite-Based Sustainable Biomaterials
- •13.1 Introduction
- •13.2 General Structures of Cellulose, Chitin and Chitosan
- •13.2.1 Cellulose
- •13.2.2 Chitin
- •13.2.3 Chitosan
- •13.3.1 Cellulose Composite-Based Biomaterials
- •13.3.2 Chitin-Chitosan Composite-Based Biomaterials
- •13.5 Advantages and Disadvantages
- •13.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •14: Sustainable Synthesis of Cellulose-Derived Hydrogels for Tissue Engineering
- •14.1 Introduction
- •14.1.1 Overview of Cellulose-Derived Hydrogels
- •14.1.3 The Aim of this Chapter
- •14.2 The Sustainable Biomaterial of Cellulose
- •14.2.1 Cellulose Structure and Properties
- •14.2.2 Properties of Cellulose
- •14.2.3 Sources of Cellulose for Hydrogel Synthesis
- •14.2.4 Advantages of Using Cellulose-Derived Materials
- •14.3 Cellulose Hydrogel Formation Techniques
- •14.3.1 Synthesis Methods
- •14.3.1.1 Chemical Crosslinking Methods
- •14.3.1.2 Physical Crosslinking Methods
- •14.3.1.3 Hybrid Approaches
- •14.4 Tissue Engineering Applications
- •14.4.1 Scaffold Design Considerations
- •14.4.2 The Biocompatibility of Cellulose-Based Hydrogels
- •14.4.3 Case Studies of Tissue Engineering with Hydrogels Generated from Cellulose
- •14.5 Sustainability in Cellulose Hydrogel Synthesis
- •14.5.1 Green Synthesis Approaches
- •14.5.3 Assessment of the Life Cycle of Hydrogels Generated from Cellulose
- •14.6 Characterization Techniques
- •14.6.1 Structural Analysis
- •14.6.2 Mechanical Properties
- •14.6.3 Biodegradability Studies
- •14.7 Challenges and Future Directions
- •14.7.1 Current Limitations in Cellulose-Based Hydrogel Technology
- •14.7.2 Opportunities for Further Research and Development
- •14.8 Conclusion
- •14.8.1 Summary of Key Points
- •14.8.2 Implications for the Field of Tissue Engineering
- •14.8.3 Recommendations for Future Work
- •References
- •15: Hydroxyapatite-Starch-Based Sustainable Biomaterials
- •15.1 Introduction
- •15.2 Hydroxyapatite
- •15.2.1 Biomedical Applications of Hydroxyapatite
- •15.3 Starch
- •15.3.1 Sources, Structure and Properties of Starch
- •15.3.2 Biomedical Applications of Starch
- •15.5 Synthesis Techniques for HA-Starch Composites
- •15.5.1 Electrospinning
- •15.5.2 Sol-Gel
- •15.5.3 Thermally Induced Phase Separation
- •15.6 Starch-Based Drug Delivery Systems
- •15.8 Hydroxyapatite-Starch Based Drug Delivery Systems
- •15.10 Future Perspectives and Challenges
- •15.11 Conclusion
- •References
- •16: Surfactant-Free Synthesis of Metal and Metal Oxide Nanomaterials: Sustainable and Eco-Synthesis Methods
- •16.1 Introduction
- •16.2.1 Solvent-Assisted Synthesis
- •16.2.1.1 N,N-Dimethylformamide (DMF) Assisted Synthesis
- •16.2.1.2 Ethylene Glycol Assisted Synthesis
- •16.2.1.3 Benzyl Alcohol Assisted Synthesis
- •16.2.1.4 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone Assisted Synthesis
- •16.2.2 Simple Ion Assisted Synthesis
- •16.2.2.1 Citrate Assisted Synthesis
- •16.2.2.2 Amino Acid Assisted Synthesis
- •16.2.2.3 Iodide Assisted Synthesis
- •16.2.2.4 Buffer Assisted Synthesis
- •16.2.3 Physical Process-Mediated Synthesis
- •16.2.3.1 Photochemically-Mediated Synthesis
- •16.2.3.2 Sonochemically Assisted Synthesis
- •16.2.3.3 Laser Ablation-Mediated Synthesis
- •16.3.1 Synthetic Catalysis
- •16.3.2 Electrocatalysis
- •16.3.3 Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering
- •16.4 Challenges, Limitation, and Future Perspective
- •16.5 Conclusions
- •References
- •Index

92 M. Chaudhuri et al.
based wound dressings with prepopulated probiotic bacteria such as
Bifidobacterium spp., Lactobacillus spp., and Pediococcus spp. that effectuate
the maximum antimicrobial activity obviously do demostrate immunomodulatory
and wound healing properties (Devi and Kumar
2021).
According to the reports, probiotic strain from BC based dressing has antimicrobial activity against various wound pathogens which thereby reduce the infection and promote the wound healing. Moreover, the PBC also modulates the
intestinal immune system, modulating the immune responses in the wound site,
triggering balanced inflammatory environments and speeding up wound healing
processes. Similarly, the ability to immobilize a range of probiotic bacteria
provides a way for various bioactive compounds (e.g., antimicrobial peptides and
growth factors) to be delivered directly to the wound by BC-based dressings, a
process which contributes toward healing (Jabbari and Babaeipour 2024a, b).
In addition, PBC dressings are endowed with certain properties (reduced pain
and minimal scarring) and benefits (biodegradable, leading to comfort for the
patient and ease of removal upon completion of the wound healing process). By
researching on it further an developing it enough PBC can serve as a revolutionary component in wound closure operations and their curing process in the
domain of variety of wound management.
2. Tissue Engineering:
Due to its features and the synergistic effects it presents with probiotic bacteria,
PBC is destined to have great perspectives for tissue engineering in the near
future. These bacteria, which are mainly acetic acid bacteria such as
Komagataeibacter xylinus, produce bacterial cellulose (BC) a polymer that is
almost ideal for the fabrication of scaffolds for tissue regeneration because it is
biocompatible, porous, and has astoundingly good mechanical strength
(Gorgieva and Trček 2019). It has been reported in different studies that BC
yield is increased in presence of probiotic bacteria such as Lactobacillus and
Bifidobacterium species, which in turn showed enhanced bioactivity (increased
cell adhesion, proliferation, differentiation, and tissue regeneration).
Additionally, PBC scaffolds are able to support the proliferation of various
cells, for instance, osteoblasts, chondrocytes, and neural cells, which characterize
PBC as a candidate for bone, cartilage, and nerve tissue engineering. Also,
probiotic BC has immunomodulatory properties which create a microenvironment normalising tissue regeneration since it is capable of modulating immune
responses and inflammation. The presence of live probiotic bacteria in BC based
scaffolds, provides an increased ability to release bioregulators such as cytokines,
growth factors and others that potentiate the regeneration phenomenon (Khan
et al. 2022). Generally, probiotic BC looks like an excellent, highly efficient
biomaterial for tissue engineering solutions and for the production of applicable
tissue substitutes in regenerative medicine.
3. Drug Delivery:
The probi
otic BC-based drug delivery systems could be a new methodology for
the site-specific release under controllable conditions. Due to the high surface
area, the porous structure of BC that enables efficient loading and encapsulation

4 Probiotic Bacterial Cellulose: A Bio-mediated Nanomaterial for Health… 93
of drugs, proteins, and growth factors, as well as probiotic bacteria that help
improve bioavailability (Khan et al.
2022). In summary, Probiotic BC carriers
offer a promising approach in the field of targeted carriers and have been used to
deliver various bioactive molecules viz. antibiotics, anti-cancer drugs and growth
factors with desired release kinetics at specific sites (Severino et al. 2019).
Through the development of probiotic BC-based DDS, researchers ultimately
endeavor to address the limitations observed among conventional drug delivery
platforms (e.g. poor solubility, rapid clearance and/or broad systemic toxicity),
leading to enhanced patient therapeutic efficacy and adherence.
4. Gastrointestinal Health:
Probiotic bacterial cellulose (PBC) is a novel method with various beneficial
properties supported by present research conclusions for better gastrointestinal
(GI) health. As PBC acts as an efficient carrier for probiotic bacteria, it supports
their survival in the acidic environment of the stomach and promotes their aggregation in the intestines. Whereas the colonisation-induced BC would result in the
alteration of gut flora which will help promote epiphytic bacteria such as Lactoba-
cillus and Bifidobacterium and suppress that of dangerous pathogens (Shi and
Walker 2004). Furthermore, a research by Selvamani et al. (2022)demonstrated
that probiotics generated from PBC exhibit their anti-inflammatory effects by
modulating immune reactions and diminishing the production of
pro-inflammatory cytokines to limit inflammation in maladies such as colitis
(Selvamani et al. 2022). Studies also suggested that the symbiotic crosstalk of
probiotics and cellulose in PBC may play a role in preserving gut barrier function
by restricting harmful pathogens and toxic substances through movement across
the intestinal epithelium (Selvamani et al. 2022). Furthermore, Vesterhus et al.
(2020) have proved that PBC-based probiotics in the GI tract were found to
enhance nutrition absorption and metabolism in the gut, and thus increased digestive efficiency (Vesterhus et al. 2020). Also, it is clear that the use ofprobiotics with
PBC on a regular basis has definitely helped boost gut motility and counter
symptoms of intestinally-related illnesses such as diarrhoea and irritable bowel
syndrome. Altogether, these investigations highlight the promising therapeutical
effect of PBC towards digestive health and the management of broad-spectrum GI
pathologies, which need to be further validated clinically.
5. Cancer and Tumour Therapy:
ic ba
Probiot
cterial cellulose has shown to be an effective solution for cancer and
another tumours with the help of its unique properties and advantages of therapeutic benefits of probiotic bacteria. Conclusively, BC offers a desirable platform
for the administration of anticancer drugs and also contribute to modification in
tumour microenvironment. They are produced by bacteria like Komagataeibacter
xylinus. Furthermore, BC based formulations exhibit higher anticancer efficacy
with reduced systemic toxicity as well as enhanced therapeutic effects when
combined along with probiotic bacteria particularly Lactobacillus and
Bifidobacterium species (Singh et al. 2023)
According
to the studies conducted so far, it is evident that using probiotic BC
.
carriers may facilitate specific regulation of targeting and triggering drug release
by delivering immunomodulators/anticancer peptides/chemotherapeutical agents

94 M. Chaudhuri et al.
directly into tumour location. In addition, the probiotic BC also has an immunomodulatory activity that can enhance anticancer immune responses, eventually
improving cancer immunotherapy (Nami et al.
2023). Researchers are aiming to
devise exciting cancer-therapy strategies that can be implemented with improved
safety, efficacy and specificity through the coo perative action of plausible
combinations of probiotic bacteria along with BC-matrices.
6. Oral Health:
The multi-benefit probiotic bacterial cellulose
a novel biopolymer in oral
can be
health. It repopulates the beneficial natural microbiota by introducing good
bacteria (like various strains of Lactobacillus and Bifidobact erium) into the oral
environment while at the same time suppressing the harmful bacteria responsible
for causing diseases like dental caries (such as Streptococcus mutans). Therefore,
the restoration of this microbial balanc e has significant implications for preventive dentistry since it can reduce cavity incidence and enhance overall oral health.
The wound-healing abilities of PBC may also be advantageous, helping recover
oral tissue and accelerating recovery in postoperative or traumata when
implemented (Rowińska et al.
2021).
Furthermore, together with its probi otic activity in bacterial cellulose, it not
only preserves the existing microbiological balance but also treats common oral
problems such as halitosis. The result is fresher breath as some strains stabilise the
oral pH and prevent odour-causing bacteria from developing by producing
organic acids, such as lactic acid. The PBC-based novel composite for oral
hygiene not only uses its capacity as an adjuvant to balance the oral microbiota
but also eliminates odour (Gregory et al. 2021).
Although PBC has promising qualities, these findings need to be further
explored and confirmed before probiotic bacterial cellulose may become a common material in dental applications. More extensive clinical trials are important to
decide whether it is successful in the long term at any dosage or technique of
conveyance, even if the underlying research tells us something positive. However, the growing interest in PBC demonstrates its ability to transform oral health
care by using the strength of helpful bacteria and their wound-healing capabilities
(Swingler et al. 2021).
7. Immunomodulation:
Because of its immunomodulatory properties, PBC can be proved as an ideal
supplement either for immunological responses control or treating diseases
related to immune system. BC-based matrices also challenged immune cells to
interact with probiotic bacteria, and BC scaffolds group increased immune
surveillance against infections and tumor cells while helped immune cell function
and even contributed in the production of anti-inflammatory cytokine (Guha et al.
2023). Based on these findings, Probiotic BC represents a natural and biocom-
patible tool to drive immune homeostasis, thus holding promise for the clinical
management of inflammatory disorders, allergies and autoimmune diseases (Han
et al. 2024).
8. Skin-Care Applications:
PBC could
be a prospective substitute material for skin care applications as a
natural and multilateral bio-material for the skin. Because of these unique

4 Probiotic Bacterial Cellulose: A Bio-mediated Nanomaterial for Health… 95
properties, PBC is widely used as a substrate in cosmetics because it has a highly
porous structure, biocompatibility and the ability to hold moisture. PBC
formulations loaded with probiotics can maintain the balance of the skin
microbiome and control inflammation, which will increase wound healing processes. Research by Chilicka et al. (
2022) also demonstrated the antimicrobial
activity of PBC-based skincare products on acne-related bacteria proving that
sustainability can be one of the alternative solutions for skin conditions such as
acne (Chilicka et al.
hydration and
2022). In addition, PBC-derived probiotics improved skin
elasticity by promoting collagen production and increasing the
function of the skin barrier, which could further increase overall moisture content
in the same. Studies by Jabbari and Babaeipour (2024a, b) highlight the scope of
PBC in formulations for skin care to protect against moisture loss and accelerate
healing following injury (Jabbari and Babaeipour 2024a, b). These results suggest
that PBC has a potential for creating new and advanced skincare formulations
contributed to probiotics in skin health and skincare.
Figure 4.2 represents different dirrections healthcare applications of PBC.
Fig. 4.2 Different applications of probiotic BC

96 M. Chaudhuri et al.
4.7 Conclusion
In conclusion, probiotic bacterial cellulose, or PBC is an incredible bio-mediated
nanomaterial that could revolutionize many different medical applications entirely.
BC, as a biopolymer with significant material properties and combined benefits of
probiotics towards human health, is one of the best candidates from this perspective.
Due to the increased interest in green and sustainable biomaterials nowadays, with
its outstanding mechanical properties together with a complex nanofibrillar structure
it is highly suitable for a range of biological applications. The high degree of
biocompatibility and biodegradability make PBC highly desirable in the healthcare
industry for reduced adverse effects and environmental consequences. PBC’s ability
to retain moisture and its porous structure makes it a very good option in cases where
wounds need to be kept moist to allow faster healing. The addition of probiotic
bacteria into PBC matrices makes the material more therapeutic; in combination with
antibacterial properties, it creates conditions favourable for tissue regeneration.
Besides wound healing, PBC reveals a promising application in the develop ment
of tailored drug delivery systems exploiting probiotic benefits for individual treatment as described. Immobilizing probiotic bacteria in PBC permit researchers to
develop new delivery systems with defined release kinetics and enhanced therapeutic effects. In addition, for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, PBC is an
inimitable material owing to its scaffold-like structure. Combining PBC with
biomolecules, growth factors, and live cells becomes a feasible procedure. It might
provide solutions to significant issues related to organ transplantation and regenerative treatments but also penetrate novel ways of performing tissue regeneration. In
any case, there must be standardization of production processes and careful safety
evaluations to achieve uniform quality levels without (much) danger, no matter how
great the potential. Meanwhile, in order to uncover the therapeutic advantages of
PBC and fully functionalize it for specific clinical purposes, further studies are
needed. These properties make PBC a promising nanomaterial that could revolutionize the field of healthcare, offering state-of-the-art reme dies for numerous
medical conditions, and improving the outcomes of diff erent patients. Furthermore,
this biopolymer can be used in many sectors more cost-effectively by using different
carbon sources as the nutrition media for bacterial fermentation. PBC is such a green
biomaterial that it can be considered as an excellent candidate for future sustainable
material because of its biodegradability.
Acknowledgement This work is supported by the internal grants IGA/CPS/2023/005 and
IGA/CPS/2024/005 from Tomas Bata University in Zlin, Czech Republic.
References
Abdelraof M et al (2019) Ecofriendly green conversion of potato peel wastes to high productivity
bacterial cellulose. Carbohydr Polym 211:75–83
Adamopoulou V
sucrofermentans in synthetic media and agrifood side streams supplemented with organic acids
and vitamins. Bioresour Technol 398:130511
et al (2024) Optimization of bacterial cellulose production by Komagataeibacter

4 Probiotic Bacterial Cellulose: A Bio-mediated Nanomaterial for Health… 97
Andritsou V et al (2018) Synthesis and characterization of bacterial cellulose from citrus-based
sustainable resources. ACS Omega 3(8):10365–10373
Arena MP et al (2016) Use of Lactobacillus plantarum strains
borne pathogenic microorganisms. Front Microbiol 7:464
Ayyash M et al (2020) Physicochemical, bioactive and rheological propertiesof an exopolysaccharide
produced by a probiotic Pediococcus pentosaceus M41. Carbohydr Polym 229:115462
Bi JC et al (2014) Morphology and structure characterization of bacterial celluloses produced by
different strains in agitated culture. J Appl Microbiol 117(5):1305–1311
Bilgi E et al (2016) Optimization of bacterial cellulose production by Gluconacetobacter xylinus
using carob and haricot bean. Int J Biol Macromol 90:2–10
Blanco Parte FG et al (2020) Current progress on the production, modification, and applications of
bacterial cellulose. Crit Rev Biotechnol 40(3):397–414
Boltz TP et al (2019) The effect of standard pelleting and more thermally aggressive pelleting
utilizing a Hygieniser on feed manufacture and reduction of enterococcus faecium, a salmonella
surrogate. J Appl Poult Res 28(4):1226–1233
Bosi A et al (2020) Tryptophan metabolites along the microbiota-gut-brain axis: an interkingdom
communication system influencing the gut in health and disease. Int J Tryptophan Res 13:
1178646920928984
Buer Boyetey M-J et al (2023) Bio-scaffold for bone tissue engineering with focus on bacterial
cellulose, biological materials for hydroxyapatite synthesis and growth factors. Eur Polym J
194:112168
Cabana MD et al (2017) Early probiotic supplementation for Eczema and Asthma prevention: a
randomized controlled trial. Pediatr 140(3):e20163000
Castro-Bravo N et al (2018) Interactions of surface exopolysaccharides from Bifidobacterium and
Lactobacillus within the intestinal environment. Front Microbiol 9:2426
Chilicka K et al (2022) Microbiome and probiotics in acne vulgaris—a narrative review. Life 12.
https://doi.org/10.3390/life12030422
Deng L et al (2024) A biological antimicrobial agent functionalized bacterial cellulose-based
wound dressing. Cellulose 31(7):4277–4289
Devi S, Kumar P (2021) Use of probiotic bacteria and their bioactive compounds for wound
care. In: Kumar P, Kothari V (eds) Wound healing research: current trends and future directions.
Springer, Singapore, pp 301–330
dos Santos KMO et al (2015) Artisanal Coalho cheeses as source of beneficial Lactobacillus
plantarum and Lactobacillus rhamnosus strains. Dairy Sci Technol 95(2):209–230
Florea M et al (2016) Engineering control of bacterial cellulose production using a genetic toolkit
and a new cellulose-producing strain. Proc Natl Acad Sci 113(24):E3431–E3440
George Kerry R et al (2018) Benefaction of probiotics for human health: a review. J Food Drug
Anal 26(3):927–939
Gopu G, Govindan S (2018) Production of bacterial cellulose from Komagataeibacter
saccharivorans strain BC1 isolated from rotten green grapes. Prep Biochem Biotechnol 48(9):
842–852
Gorgieva S, Trček J (2019) Bacterial cellulose: production, modification and perspectives in
biomedical applications. Nanomaterials 9(10):1352. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9101352
Gregory DA et al (2021) Bacterial cellulose: a smart biomaterial with diverse applications. Mater
Sci Eng R Rep 145:100623
Gromovykh TI et al (2017) Bacterial cellulose synthesized by Gluconacetobacter hansenii for
medical applications. Appl Biochem Microbiol 53(1):60–67
Guha A et al (2023) Cancer stem cell–immune cell crosstalk in breast tumor microenvironment: a
determinant of therapeutic facet. Front Immunol 14:1245421
Han Z-Y et al (2024) Microalgal biomass-assisted delivery of probiotics for modulation of gut
homeostasis and alleviation of intestinal inflammation. Nano Today 54:102093
He X et al (2020) Novel bacterial cellulose membrane biosynthesized by a new and highly efficient
producer Komagataeibacter rhaeticus TJPU03. Carbohydr Res 493:108030
Heilbronner S et al (2021) The microbiome-shaping roles of bacteriocins. Nat Rev Microbiol
19(11):726–739
as a bio-control strategy against food-

98 M. Chaudhuri et al.
Hill C et al (2014) The international scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus
statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol
11(8):506–514
S et al (2016) Assessment of probiotic, antifungal and cholesterol lowering properties of
Ilavenil
Pediococcus pentosaceus KCC-23 isolated from Italian ryegrass. J Sci Food Agric 96(2):
593–601
Jabbari F, Babaeipour V (2024a) Bacterial cellulose as a potential biopolymer for wound care. A
review. Int J Polym Mater Polym Biomater 73(6):455–477
Jabbari F, Babaeipour V (2024b) Bacterial cellulose as an ideal potential treatment for burn wounds:
a comprehensive review. Wound Repair Regen 32:323–339
Jayani T et al (2020) Bacterial cellulose nano fiber (BCNF) as carrier support for the immobilization
of probiotic, Lactobacillus acidophilus 016. Carbohydr Polym 250:116965
Jia Y et al (2017) Preparation and characterization of a novel bacterial cellulose/chitosan
bio-hydrogel. Nanomat Nanotechnol 7:1847980417707172
Jiang S et al (2021) Pediococcus pentosaceus, a future additive or probiotic candidate. Microb Cell
Factories 20(1):45
Juturu V, Wu JC (2018) Microbial production of bacteriocins: latest research development and
applications. Biotechnol Adv 36(8):2187–2200
Kamal T et al (2022) Cost-effective synthesis of bacterial cellulose and its applications in the food
and environmental sectors. Gels 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels8090552
Kaur N et al (2023) Bacterial exopolysaccharides as emerging bioactive macromolecules: from
fundamentals to applications. Res Microbiol 174(4):104024
Khalil ES et al (2018) Probiotic properties of exopolysaccharide-producing Lactobacillus strains
isolated from Tempoyak. Molecules 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23020398
Khan S et al (2022) Fabrication strategies and biomedical applications of three-dimensional
bacterial cellulose-based scaffolds: a review. Int J Biol Macromol 209:9–30
Konuray G, Erginkaya Z (2018) Potential use of Bacillus coagulans in the food industry. Food
Secur 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods7060092
Kumar V et al (2019) Efficient and economic process for the production of bacterial cellulose from
isolated strain of Acetobacter pasteurianus of RSV-4 bacterium. Bioresour Technol 275:430–
433
Lee Y et al (2017) Effects of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12
®
on the lipid/lipoprotein
profile and short chain fatty acids in healthy young adults: a randomized controlled trial. Nutr J
16(1):39
Li G et al (2023) The effects of probiotics supplementation on glycaemic control among adults with
type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.
J Transl Med 21(1):442
Luo H et al (2013) Characterization of TEMPO-oxidized bacterial cellulose scaffolds for tissue
engineering applications. Mater Chem Phys 143(1):373–379
Ma L et al (2020) Bacterial cellulose: an encouraging eco-friendly nano-candidate for energy
storage and energy conversion. J Mater Chem A 8(12):5812–5842
Mahsuli T et al (2019) Mechanical properties of bacterial nanocellulose membrane from pineapple
peel waste after homogenization process. AIP Conference Proceedings 2120(1):050019
Marasco G et al (2020) Probiotics, prebiotics and other dietary supplements for gut microbiota
modulation in celiac disease patients. Nutrients 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12092674
María Remes-Troche J et al (2020) Lactobacillus acidophilus LB: a useful pharmabiotic for the
treatment of digestive disorders. Ther Adv Gastroenterol 13:1756284820971201
Martín R et al (2013) Role of commensal and probiotic bacteria in human health: a focus on
inflammatory bowel disease. Microb Cell Factories 12(1):71
Mensah A
et al (2022) Membrane technological pathways and inherent structure of bacterial
cellulose composites for drug delivery. Bioengineering 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/
bioengineering9010003

4 Probiotic Bacterial Cellulose: A Bio-mediated Nanomaterial for Health… 99
Nami Y et al (2023) Probiotic immunonutrition impacts on colon cancer immunotherapy and
prevention. Eur J Cancer Prev 32(1):30–47
Naomi R et al (2020) Plant- vs. bacterial-derived cellulose for wound healing: a review.
Environ Res Public Health 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186803
Nayak R et al (2024) Potential of bacterial cellulose for sustainable fashion and textile applications:
a review. J Mater Sci 59(16):6685–6710
Oliveira-Alcântara AV et al (2020) Bacterial cellulose/cashew gum films as probiotic carriers. LWT
130:109699
Öz YE, Kalender M (2023) A novel static cultivation of bacterial cellulose production from sugar
beet molasses: series static culture (SSC) system. Int J Biol Macromol 225:1306–1314
Pahumunto N et al (2020) Fermented milk containing a potential probiotic lactobacillus rhamnosus
SD11 with maltitol reduces Streptococcus mutans: a double-blind, randomized, controlled
study. J Dent Sci 15(4):403–410
Palem RR et al (2024) In situ fabricated ZnO nanostructures within carboxymethyl cellulose-based
ternary hydrogels for wound healing applications. Carbohydr Polym 334:122020
Pang M et al (2020) Application of bacterial cellulose in skin and bone tissue engineering. Eur
Polym J 122:109365
Parizzi LP et al (2012) The genome sequence of Propionibacterium acidipropionici provides
insights into its biotechnological and industrial potential. BMC Genomics 13(1):562
Park S-K et al (2023) Probiotic properties of Pediococcus pentosaceus JBCC 106 and its lactic acid
fermentation on Broccoli juice. Microorganisms 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/
microorganisms11081920
Patel A et al (2012) Probiotic properties of exopolysaccharide producing lactic acid bacteria isolated
from vegetables and traditional Indian fermented foods. New Delhi Publishers, New Delhi
Prantera C, Scribano ML (2002) Probiotics and Crohn’s disease. Dig Liver Dis 34:S66–S67
Rahbar Saadat Y et al (2019) A comprehensive review of anticancer, immunomodulatory and health
beneficial effects of the lactic acid bacteria exopolysaccharides. Carbohydr Polym 217:79–89
Rani RP et al (2018) Characterization of a novel exopolysaccharide produced by lactobacillus
gasseri FR4 and demonstration of its in vitro biological properties. Int J Biol Macromol 109:
772–783
Rashidian E et al (2021) Synthesis and characterization of bacterial cellulose/graphene oxide nano-
biocomposites. Polym Compos 42(9):4698–4706
Razmpoosh E et al (2019) The effect of probiotic supplementation on glycemic control and lipid
profile in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized placebo controlled trial. Diabetes Metab
Syndr Clin Res Rev 13(1):175–182
Riaz Rajoka MS et al (2018) Functional characterization and biotechnological potential of
exopolysaccharide produced by Lactobacillus rhamnosus strains isolated from human breast
milk. LWT 89:638–647
Ringel-Kulka T et al (2017) Multi-center, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-
group study to evaluate the benefit of the probiotic Bifidobacterium infantis 35624 in
non-patients with symptoms of abdominal discomfort and bloating. Off J Am Coll Gastroenterol
ACG 112(1):145–151
Rowińska I et al (2021) The influence of diet on oxidative stress and inflammation induced by
bacterial biofilms in the human Oral cavity. Materials 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14061444
Sabio L et al (2021) Probiotic cellulose: antibiotic-free biomaterials with enhanced antibacterial
activity. Acta Biomater 124:244–253
Savitskaya I et al (2019) Antimicrobial and wound healing properties of a bacterial cellulose based
material containing B. subtilis cells. Heliyon 5(10):e02592
Savitskaya I et al (2024) Prebiotic Cellulose–Pullulan Matrix as a “Vehicle” for Probiotic Biofilm
Delivery to the Host Large Intestine. Polymers 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16010030
Selvamani S
bowel disease: a recent update. Saudi J Biol Sci 29(5):3546–3567
et al (2022) Efficacy of probiotics-based interventions as therapy for inflammatory
Int J

100 M. Chaudhuri et al.
Severino P et al (2019) Alginate nanoparticles for drug delivery and targeting. Curr Pharm Des
25(11):1312–1334
Shi HN, Walker A (2004) Bacterial colonization and the
Gastroenterol 18:690421
Singh P et al (2018) On the viability, cytotoxicity and stability of probiotic bacteria entrapped in
cellulose-based particles. Food Hydrocoll 82:457–465
Singh D et al (2023) Probiotics: friend or foe to the human immune system. Bull Natl Res Cent
47(1):126
Swingler S et al (2021) Recent advances and applications of bacterial cellulose in biomedicine.
Polymers 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13030412
Tette F-M et al (2022) Therapeutic anti-depressant potential of microbial GABA produced by
Lactobacillus rhamnosus strains for GABAergic signaling restoration and inhibition of
addiction-induced HPA axis hyperactivity. Curr Issues Mol Biol 44:1434–1451. https://doi.
org/10.3390/cimb44040096
Torgbo S, Sukyai P (2020) Biodegradation and thermal stability of bacterial cellulose as biomate-
rial: the relevance in biomedical applications. Polym Degrad Stab 179:109232
Trabelsi I et al (2015) Purification and characterization of a novel exopolysaccharides produced by
Lactobacillus sp. Ca6. Int J Biol Macromol 74:541–546
Tseng YS et al (2023) Improved production of bacterial cellulose by Komagataeibacter europaeus
employing fruit extract as carbon source. J Food Sci Technol 60(3):1054–1064
Ul-Islam M et al (2013) Effect of post-synthetic processing conditions on structural variations and
applications of bacterial cellulose. Cellulose 20(1):253–263
Ullah MW et al (2016) Structural and physico-mechanical characterization of bio-cellulose pro-
duced by a cell-free system. Carbohydr Polym 136:908–916
Ullah MW et al (2017) Recent advancements in bioreactions of cellular and cell-free systems: a
study of bacterial cellulose as a model. Korean J Chem Eng 34(6):1591–1599
Vakadaris G et al (2023) The role of probiotics in inducing and maintaining remission in Crohn’s
disease and ulcerative colitis: a systematic review of the literature. Biomedicines 11. https://doi.
org/10.3390/biomedicines11020494
Varela-Trinidad GU et al (2022) Probiotics: protecting our health from the gut. Microorganisms 10.
https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10071428
Vesterhus M et al. (2020) Emerging therapies in primary sclerosing cholangitis: pathophysiological
basis and clinical opportunities. J Gastroenterol 55(6):588–614
Volova TG et al (2018) Production and properties of bacterial cellulose by the strain
Komagataeibacter xylinus B-12068. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 102(17):7417–7428
Wang L et al (2019) Exopolysaccharide, isolated from a novel strain Bifidobacterium breve lw01
possess an anticancer effect on head and neck cancer – genetic and biochemical evidences. Front
Microbiol 10
Wang G et al (2020) Lactobacillus acidophilus JCM 1132 strain and its mutant with different
Bacteriocin-producing behaviour have various in situ effects on the gut microbiota of healthy
mice. Microorganisms 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8010049
Wang Y et al (2021) Metabolism characteristics of lactic acid bacteria and the expanding
applications in food industry. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 9:612285
Wang X et al (2022) Microencapsulating alginate-based polymers for probiotics delivery systems
and their application. Pharmaceuticals 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph15050644
Wang X et al (2023) Printability of hybridized composite from maleic acid-treated bacterial
cellulose with gelatin for bone tissue regeneration. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater 6(4):134
Xie C et al (2015) Probiotics for the prevention of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea in older patients: a
systematic review. Travel Med Infect Dis 13(2):128–134
Xu C et al (2014) Antioxidant, antibacterial, and Antibiofilm properties of polyphenols from
Muscadine grape (Vitis rotundifolia Michx.) pomace against selected foodborne pathogens.
J Agric Food Chem 62(28):6640–6649
Xu Y
et al (2019) Purification, characterization and bioactivity of exopolysaccharides produced by
lactobacillus plantarum
KX041. Int J Biol Macromol 128:480–492
development of intestinal defences. Can J

4 Probiotic Bacterial Cellulose: A Bio-mediated Nanomaterial for Health… 101
Yang Y et al (2019) Bile salt hydrolase can improve Lactobacillus plantarum survival in gastroin-
testinal tract by enhancing their adhesion ability.
Yang Y et al (2024) Delivery of probiotics with cellulose-based films and their food applications.
Polymers 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16060794
Yao J et al (2017) Macrofibers with high mechanical performance based on aligned bacterial
cellulose nanofibers. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9(24):20330–20339
Yao H et al (2022) Design strategies for adhesive hydrogels with natural antibacterial agents as
wound dressings: status and trends. Mater Today Bio 16:100429
Ye J et al (2024) Preparation of bacterial cellulose-based antibacterial membranes with prolonged
release of drugs: emphasis on the chemical structure of drugs. Carbohydr Polym 323:121379
Yuan F et al (2017) Efficacy of Bifidobacterium infantis 35624 in patients with irritable bowel
syndrome: a meta-analysis. Curr Med Res Opin 33(7):1191–1197
Zeng Y et al (2020) Evaluation of the antibacterial activity and probiotic potential of Lactobacillus
plantarum isolated from Chinese homemade pickles. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol 2020:
8818989
Zeng Y et al (2022) Lactobacillus plantarum disrupts S. mutans–C. albicans cross-kingdom
biofilms. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 12:872012
FEMS Microbiol Lett 366(8):fnz100
Mr. Mainak Chaudhuri, B.Sc. and M.Sc. in Zoology from The
University of Burdwan, India. At present, working as a doctoral
student at the Centre of Polymer Systems of Tomas Bata University in Zlin, Czech Republic, under the supervision of doc.
Nabanita Saha, M.Sc. Ph.D. in the course ‘Biomaterials and
Biocomposites’. In the meantime, I attended “Training School
2022 Textile Technologies” in July 2022, organized by
COSTAction_CONTEXT_CA17107 at Prato, Italy and “Training
on
Studies” in August 2022, organized by Rudlofs Cimdins
Cell
Riga Biomaterials Innovation and Development Centre at Riga,
Latvia, for INJECT-BIO project “Bioactive injectable hydrogels
for soft tissue regeneration after reconstructive maxillofacial
surgeries”.
Mainak Chaudhuri represented his University in the All-India
Science Congress with his team during his master’s degree.
Besides this, his hobby is Wildlife and nature photography, and
he is fond of capturing beautiful photographs of nature.
Dr. Nabanita Saha is a biotechnologist, who received her
B.Sc. and M.Sc. degree in “Life Sciences (Botany)” from Visva
Bharati University, Santiniketan, India, and was awarded a PhD in
“Microbial Biotechnology” from the Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur. She received her habilitation ‘Associate Professor Degree’ in “Technology of Macromolecular Substances” in
2006 from Tomas Bata University in Zlin, Czech Republic. For
the last 22 years, she has been working at Tomas Bata University
in Zlin, Czech Republic, on biomaterials and biocomposites/biobased polymeric materials. Dr. Nabanita Saha currently holds an
Associate Professor (Faculty of Technology) and Senior
Researcher (Centre of Polymer Systems & Footwear Research
Centre) position at the same university. Her research group mainly
focused their research on the preparation and characterization of
bio-based biomaterials (in the form of gel and hydrogels and the
production of bacterial cellulose) for health care and commodity
applications. She is the author/co-author of more than 89 papers
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
