Добавил:
ivanov666
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Элиситоры и их применение в растениеводстве
.pdf
15. Howe, G. A. Jasmonates as signals in the wound response / G. A. Howe //
J. Plant Growth Regul. – 2004. – Vol. 23. – P. 223–237.
16. Boller, T. Renaissance of Elicitors: Perception of Microbe-Associated
Molecular Patterns and Danger Signals by Patter n-Recognition Receptors / T. Boller,
G. A. Felix // Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. – 2009. – Vol. 60. – P. 379–406.
17. Howe, G. A. Plant Immunity to Insect Herbivores / G. A. Howe, G. Jander //
Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. – 2008. – Vol. 59. – P. 41–66.
18. Induced disease resistance in plants by chemicals / M. Oostendorp [et al.] //
Eur. J. Plant Path. – 2001. – Vol. 107. – P. 19–28.
19. Angelova, Z. Elicitation of plants / Z. Angelova, S. Georgiev, W. Ross //
Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Eq. – 2006. – Vol. 20, № 2. – P. 72–83.
20. Mauch-Mani, B. Production of Salicylic Acid Precursors 1s a Major Function of Phenylalanine Ammonia-Lyase in the Resistance of Arabidopsis to Peronospora parasitica / B. Mauch-Mani, A. J. Slusarenko // Plant Cell. – 1996. – Vol. 8. –
P. 203–212.
21. Comprehensive transcript proling of Pto- and Prf-mediated host defense
responses to infection by Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato / K. S. Mysore [et al.] //
Plant J. – 2002. – Vol. 32. – P. 299–315.
22. Дмитриев, А. П. Фитоалексины и их роль в устойчивости растений /
А. П. Дмитриев. – Киев: Наук. думка. 2000. – 208 с.
23. Dixon, R. A. Natural products and plant disease resistance / R. A. Dixon //
Nature. – 2001. – Vol. 411. – P. 843–847.
24. Heath, M. C. Signalling between pathogenic rust fungi and resistant or
susceptible host plants / M. C. Heath // Ann. Bot. – 1997. – Vol. 80. – P. 713–720.
25. Kessler, A. Plant responses to insect herbivory: The Emerging Molecular
Analysis / A. Kessler, I. T. Baldwin // Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. – 2002. – Vol. 53. –
P. 299–328.
26. Bolwell, G. P. Role of active oxygen species and NO in plant defense
responses / G. P. Bolwell // Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. – 1999. – Vol. 2. – P. 287–294.
27. Mehdy, M. C. Active Oxygen Species in Plant Defense against Pathogens /
M. C. Mehdy // Plant Physiol. – 1994. – Vol. 105. – P. 467–472.
28. Modulation of the elicitation response in cultured French bean cells and its
implication for the mechanism of signal transduction / G. P. Bolwell [et al.] //
Phytochem. – 1991. – Vol. 30. – P. 397–405.
29. Volpin, H. Signalling in arbuscular mycorrhiza: facts and hypotheses /
H. Volpin, Y. Elkind // Plant Physiol. – 1994. – Vol. 104. – P. 683–689.
30. Molecular genetics of plant disease resistance / B. J. Staskawicz [et al.] //
Science. – 1995. – Vol. 268. – P. 661–667.
31. Cutt, J. R. Genes Involved in Plant Defense / J. R. Cutt, D. F. Klessig,
T. Boller, and F. Meins, (ed). – Springer-Verlag, 1992. – P. 209–243.
32. Expression of stress gene networks in tomato lines susceptible and resistant
to Tomato yellow leaf curl virus in response to abiotic stresses / R. Gorovitsa [et al.] //
Plant Physiol. Biochem. – 2008. – Vol. 46. – P. 482–492.
161
33. Мосолов, В. В. Растительные белковые ингибиторы протеолитиче-
ских ферментов / В. В. Мосолов, Т. А. Валуева. – ВИНИТИ. – 1993. – 207 c.
34. Heath, M. C. Apoptosis, programmed cell death and the hypersensitive res-
ponse / M. C. Heath // Eur. J. Plant Pathol. – 1998. – Vol. 104. – P. 117–124.
35. Yamaguchi, Y. Endogenous peptide elicitors in higher plants / Y. Yamagu-
chi, A. Huffaker // Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. – 2011. – Vol. 14. – P. 351–357.
36. Walters, D. R. Induced resistance: helping plants to help themselves /
D. R. Walters, A. C. Newton, G. D. Lyon // Biologist. – 2005. – Vol. 52. – P. 28–33.
37. MAP kinase signalling cascade in Arabidopsis innate immunity / T. Asai
[et al.] // Nature. – 2002. – Vol. 415. – P. 977–983.
38. Plants have a sensitive perception system for the most conserved domain
of bacterial agellin / G. Felix [et al.] // Plant J. – 1999. – Vol. 18. – P. 265–276.
39. The Elicitation of Plant Innate Immunity by Liposaccharide of Xanthomonas
campestris / A. Silipo [et al.] // J. Biol. Chem. – 2005. – Vol. 280. – P. 33660–33668.
40. Lee, J. A Harpin Binding Site in Tobacco Plasma Membranes Mediates
Activation of the Pathogenesis-Related Gene HIN1 Independent of Extracellular
Calcium but Dependent on Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Activity / J. Lee,
D. F. Klessig, T. Nürnberger // Plant Cell. – 2001. – Vol. 13. – P. 1079–1093.
41. Comparison of the structures and elicitor activities of a synthetic and
a mycelial-wall-derived heXa(p-D – glUCOpyranOSyl)-O-glUCitOl / J.-K. Sharp
[et al.] // J. Biol. Chem. – 1984. – Vol. 259. – P. 11341–11345.
42. Bostock, R.-M. Eicosapentaenoic and arachidonic acids from Phytophthora
infestans elicit fungitoxic sesquiterpenes in the potato / R.-M. Bostock, J.-A. Kuc,
R.-A. Laine // Science. – 1981. – Vol. 212. – P. 67–69.
43. Collmer, A. The Role of Pectic Enzymes in Plant Pathogenesis / A. Collmer,
N.-T. Keen // Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. – 1986. – Vol. 24. – P. 383–409.
44. Tor, M. Tapping into molecular conversation between oomycete plant pathogens and their hosts / M. Tor // Eur. J. Plant Pathol. – 2008. – Vol. 122. – P. 57–69.
45. Kamoun, S. A Catalogue of the Effector Secretome of Plant Pathogenic
Oomycetes / S. Kamoun // Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. – 2006. – Vol. 44. – P. 41– 60.
46. Yoshikawa, M. Elicitors: their signicance and primary modes of action in
the induction of plant defense reactions / M. Yoshikawa, N. Yamaoka, Y. Takeuchi //
Plant Cell Physiol. – 1993. – Vol. 34. – P. 1163–1173.
47. Tor, M. Receptor-mediated signalling in plants: molecular patterns and
programmes / M. Tor, M. T. Lotze, N. Holton // J. Exp. Bot. – 2009. – Vol. 60, № 13. –
P. 3645–3654.
48. Systemin and jasmonic acid regulate constitutive and herbivore-induced
systemic volatile emissions in tomato, Solanum lycopersicum / D. C. Degenhardt
[et al.] // Phytochem. – 2010. – Vol. 71. – P. 2024–2037.
49. Fraile, A. The coevolution of plants and viruses: resistance and pathogenicity / A. Fraile, F. Garcia-Arenal // Adv. Virus Res. – 2010. – Vol. 76. – P. 1–32.
50. Soosaar, J. L. Mechanisms of plant resistance to viruses / J. L. Soosaar,
T. M. Burch-Smith, S. P. Dikesh-Kumar // Nat. Rev. Microbiol. – 2005. – Vol. 3. –
P. 789–798.
162
51. Arimuro, G.-I. Herbivore-induced, indirect plant defences / G.-I. Arimuro //
BBA. – 2005, № 1734. – P. 91–111.
52. Cullimore, J. V. Perception of lipo-chitooligosaccharidic Nod factors in legu-
mes / J. V. Cullimore, R. Ranjeva // Trends Plant Sci. – 2001. – Vol. 6. – P. 24–30.
53. Фундаментальная фитопатология / Ю. Т. Дьяков [и др.]. – М.: Красанд,
2012. – 512 с.
54. The grateful death damage-associated molecular pattern molecules and
reduction/oxidation regulate immunity / M. T. Lotze [et al.] // Immunol. Rev. –
2007. – Vol. 220. – P. 60–81.
55. Matzinger, P. The danger model: a renewed sense of self / P. Matzinger //
Science. – 2002. – Vol. 296. – P. 301–305.
56. Cucumber Hypocotyls Respond to Cutin Monomers via Both an Inducible
and a Constitutive H2O2-Generating System / H. Kauss [et al.] // Plant Physiol. –
1999. – Vol. 120. – P. 1175–1182.
57. He, P. Elicitation and suppression of microbe-associated molecular patterntriggered immunity in plant-microbe interactions / P. He, L. Shan, J. Sheen // Cell.
Microbiol. – 2007. – Vol. 9. – P. 1385–1396.
58. Nurnberger, T. Innate immunity in plants and animals: emerging parallels
between the recognition of general elicitors and pathogen-associated molecular patterns / T. Nurnberger, F. Brunner // Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. – 2002. – Vol. 5. – P. 318–324.
59. Cohn, J. Innate immunity in plants / J. Cohn, G. Sessa // Curr. Opin. Immunol. – 2001. – Vol. 13. – P. 55–62.
60. Peptidoglycan and Muropeptides from Pathogens Agrobacterium and
Xanthomonas Elicit Plant Innate Immunity: Structure and Activity / G. Erbs [et al.] //
Chem. Biol. – 2008. – Vol. 15. – P. 438–448.
61. Bacteria-derived peptidoglycans constitute pathogen – associated molecular
patterns triggering innate immunity in Arabidopsis / A. A. Gust [et al.] // J. Biol.
Chem. – 2007. – Vol. 282. – P. 32338–32348.
62. Озерецковская, О. Л. Хитин и хитозан. Получение, свойства и применение / О. Л. Озерецковская, Н. И. Васюкова, С. В. Зиновьева. – М.: Наука. –
2002. – С. 280–360.
63. Host-Pathogen Interactions: XI. Composition and Structure of Wallreleased Elicitor Fractions / A. R. Ayers [et al.] // Plant Physiol. – 1976. – Vol. 57. –
P. 751–759.
64. Elicitor-active glycoproteins in apoplastie uids of stem-rust-infected
wheat leaves / B. Beissmann [et al.] // Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. – 1992. – Vol. 40. –
P. 79–89.
65. Specic binding of a hypersensitive lignication elicitor from Puccinia
graminis f. sp. tritici to the plasma membrane from wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) /
G. Kogel [et al.] // Planta. – 1991. – Vol. 183. – P. 164–169.
66. Reglinski, T. Induction of resistance mechanisms in barley by yeast-derived
elicitors / T. Reglinski, A. C. Newton, G. D. Lyon // Ann. Appl. Biol. – 1994. –
Vol. 124. – P. 509–517.
163
67. Ильинская, Л. И. Биохимические аспекты индуцированной устойчивости и восприимчивости растений. Биохимические механизмы индуцированной устойчивости растений / Л. И. Ильинская, О. Л. Озерецковская // Итоги науки и техники, Сер. защ. раст. – 1991. – Т. 7. – С. 4–102.
68. Basse, C. W. Elicitors and suppressors of the defense response in tomato
cells / C. W. Basse, K. Bock, T. Boller // J. Biol. Chem. – 1992. – Vol. 267. –
P. 10258–10265.
69. Elicitor-induced Ethylene Biosynthesis in Tomato Cells / G. Felix [et al.] //
Plant Physiol. – 1991. – Vol. 97. – P. 19–25.
70. Hohl, H. R. Host–parasite interfaces in a resistant and a susceptible cultivar
of Solanum tuberosum inoculated with Phytophthora infestans: tuber tissue /
H. R. Hohl, P. Stoessl // Can. J. Bot. – 1976. – Vol. 54. – P. 900 –912.
71. Hoppe, H. H. General Review of Active Defence Mechanisms in Plants
Against Pathogens / H. H. Hoppe, B. Humme // Phytopathol. Z. – 1980. – Vol. 97. –
P. 85–88.
72. Huang, Y. Isolation and purication of a factor from Pseudomonas solanacearum that induces a hypersensitive-like response in potato cells / Y. Huang, P. Heldeson, L. Sequeira // Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. – 1989. – Vol. 2, № 3. – P. 132–138.
73. Disulfooxy fatty acids from the American bird grasshopper Schistocerca
americana, elicitors of plant volatiles / H. T. Alborn [et al.] // Proc. Natl Acad. Sci.
USA. – 2007. – Vol. 104. – P. 12976–12981.
74. Van Loon, L. C. Systemic resistance induced by rhizosphere bacteria /
L. C. Van Loon, P. A. H. M. Bakker, M. J. Pieterse // Annu. Rev. Phytopatol. – 1998. –
Vol. 36. – P. 453–483.
75. Determinants of Pseudomonas putida WCS358 involved in inducing systemic resistance in plants / H. Meziane [et al.] // Mol. Plant Pathol. – 2005. – Vol. 6. –
P. 177–185.
76. The Acylation and Phosphorylation Pattern of Lipid A from Xanthomonas
Campestris Strongly Inuence its Ability to Trigger the Innate Immune Response
in Arabidopsis / A. Silipo [et al.] // Chem. Bio. Chem. – 2008. – Vol. 9. – P. 896–904.
77. Bent, A. F. Elicitors, effectors, and R genes: The new paradigm and a lifetime supply of questions / A. F. Bent, D. Mackey // Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. – 2007. –
Vol. 45. – P. 399–436.
78. Hammerschmidt, R. Phytoalexins: What Have We Learned After 60 Years? /
R. Hammerschmidt // Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. – 1999. – Vol. 37. – P. 285–306.
79. Cell Wall Alterations and Localized Accumulation of Feruloyl-3’-methoxytyamine in Onion Epidermis at Sites of Attempted Penetration by Botrytis allii
Are Associated with Actin Polarision, Peroxidase Activity and Suppression of Flavonoid Biosynthesis / S. R. McLusky [et al.] // Plant J. – 1999. – Vol. 17. – P. 523–534.
80. Li, J. Kunitz Trypsin Inhibitor: An Antagonist of Cell Death Triggered by
Phytopathogens and Fumonisin B1 in Arabidopsis / J. Li, G. Brader, E. T. Palva //
Mol. Plant. – 2008. – Vol. 1. – P. 482–495.
81. Perception of Fungal Sterols in Plants / J. Granado [et al.] // Plant Physiol. –
1995. – Vol. 107. – P. 485–490.
164
82. Lochman, J. Ergosterol treatment leads to the expression of a specic set
of defence-related genes in tobacco / J. Lochman, V. Mikes // Plant Mol. Biol. –
2006. – Vol. 62. – P. 43–51.
83. Channel-forming peptaibols are a novel class of potent elicitors of plant
secondary metabolism and tendril coiling / J. Engelberth [et al.] // Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed. – 2000. – Vol. 112. – P. 1928–1930.
84. Schaller, A. Induction of wound response gene expression in tomato leaves
by ionophores / A. Schaller, D. Frasson // Planta. – 2001. – Vol. 212. – P. 431– 435.
85. Loreto, F. J.-P. Schnitzler Abiotic stresses and induced biogenic volatile organic compounds / F. Loreto, J.-P. Schnitzler // Trends Plant Sci. – 2010. – Vol. 15. –
P. 154–166.
86. Holopainen, K. Multiple stress factors and the emission of plant VOCs /
K. Holopainen, J. Gershenzon // Trends Plant Sci. – 2010. – Vol. 15. – P. 176 –184.
87. Mitchell, A. F. Potassium phosphate induces systemic protection in barley
to powdery mildew infection / A. F. Mitchell, D. R. Walters // Pest. Manage. Sci. –
2004. – Vol. 60. – P. 126–134.
88. Pathogenesis-related Protein and Phytoalexin Induction against Cucumber
Powdery Mildew by Elicitors / A. Muneera [et al.] // Int. J. Plant Pat. – 2011. – Vol. 2. –
P. 63–71.
89. Induced disease resistance by isonicotinic acid derivatives / H. Kessmann
[et al.] // Jpn. J. Pestic. Sci. – 1993. – Vol. 10. – P. 29–37.
90. β-aminobutyric acid-induced resistance in plants / G. Jakab [et al.] // Eur. J.
Plant Pathol. – 2001. – Vol. 107. – P. 29–37.
91. Siegrist, J. Role of Reactive Oxygen Species in Abiotic and Biotic Stresses
in Plants / J. Siegrist, M. Orober // Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. – 2000. – Vol. 56. –
P. 95–106.
92. Proteomic analysis of rice defense response induced by probenazole / Y.-Z.
Lin [et al.] // Phytochem. – 2008. – Vol. 69. – P. 715–728.
93. Mahmood, T. Proteome analysis of probenazol – effect in rice-bacterial
blight infection / T. Mahmood, M. Kakishima // Prot. Pept. Lett. – 2009. – Vol. 16. –
P. 1041–1052.
94. Тютерев, С. Л. Научные основы индуцированной болезнеустойчиво-
сти растений / С. Л. Тютерев – СПб.: Санкт-Петербург, 2002. – 328 с.
95. Варламова, В. П. Хитин и хитозан: получение, свойства и применение /
В. П. Варламова; под ред. К. Г. Скрябина, Г. А. Вихоревой. – М.: Наука, 2002. – 368 с.
96. Максимов, И. В. Биологическая активность хитина и сферы его применения / И. В. Максимов // Известия Уфимского научного центра РАН, Биология, биохимия и генетика. – 2013, № 2. – С. 38–61.
97. Роль структуры в биологической активности хитозана / С. Н. Куликов
[и др.] // Вест. Казан. технол. ун-та. – 2007, № 6. – С. 10–15.
98. Куликов, С. Н. Роль структуры в элиситорной активности хитозана /
С. Н. Куликов, В. П. Варламов // Учен. зап. казан. гос. у-та, Естественные науки. – 2008. – Т. 150, кн. 2. – С. 43–58.
165
99. Evaluation of the biocompatibility of a chitosan scaffold in mice / P. J. Vande
Vord [et al.] // J. Biomed. Mater. Res. – 2002. – Vol. 59, № 3. – P. 585–590.
100. Onishi, H. Biodegradation and Distribution of Water-Soluble Chitosan
in Mice / H. Onishi, Y. Mashida // Biomaterials. – 1999. – Vol. 20, № 2. – P. 175–181.
101. Васюкова, Н. И. Элиситорная активность хитозана и арахидоновой
кислоты: сходство и различие / Н. И. Васюкова [и др.] // Прикл. биохимия
и микробиол. – 2012. – Т. 48, № 1. – С. 109–116.
102. EPA Poly-D-glucosamine (chitosan); exemption from the requirement of
a tolerance U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Final Rule. // Federal Register. –
1995. – Vol. 60. – P. 19523–19524.
103. Muzzarelli, R. A. A. Chitosan chemistry: Relevance to the biomedical
sciences / R. A. A. Muzzarelli, C. Muzzarelli // Adv. Polym. Sci. – 2004. – Vol. 186. –
P. 151–209.
104. Chitin/PLGA blend microspheres as a biodegradable drug-delivery system: phase-separation, degradation and release behavior / F. L. Mi [et al.] // Biomaterials. – 2002. – Vol. 23. – P. 3257–3267.
105. Perspectives for chitosan based antimicrobial lms in food applications /
P. K. Dutta [et al.] // Food Chem. – 2009. – Vol. 114, № 4. – P. 1173–1182.
106. Фитоактивные хитиновые соединения / В. И. Максимов [и др.] //
Прикл. биохим. и микробиол. – 1997. – Т. 33, № 4. – С. 355–362.
107. Ravi Kumar, M. N. V. Chitosan chemistry and pharmaceutical perspectives /
M. N. V. Ravi Kumar [et al.] // Chem. Rev. – 2004. – Vol. 104, № 12. – P. 6017–6084.
108. Tsigos, I. Chitin deacetylases: new, versatile tools in biotechnology /
I. Tsigos [et al.] // Trends in Biotechnol. – 2000. – Vol. 18. – P. 305–312.
109. Соколов, Ю. А. Хитин и хитозан как экзогенные элиситоры (обзор) /
Ю. А. Соколов // Биорегуляторы: исследование и применение: сб. науч. тр.
Вып. 3. – Минск: Беларуская навука, 2014. – С. 135–147.
110. Модулирование болезнеустойчивости растений с помощью водорастворимого хитозана / Н. И. Васюкова [и др.] // Прикл. биохим. и микробиол. –
2001. – Т. 37, № 1. – С. 115–122.
111. Roller, S. The antifungal properties of chitosan in laboratory media and
apple juice / S. Roller, N. Covill // Int. J. Food Microbiology. – 1999. – Vol. 47. –
P. 67–77.
112. Чирков, С. Н. Противовирусная активность хитозана / С. Н. Чирков //
Прикл. биохим. и микробиол. – 2002. – Т. 38, № 1. – С. 5–13.
113. Влияние молекулярной массы хитозана на его противовирусную активность в растениях / С. Н. Куликов [и др.] // Прикл. биохим. и микробиол. –
2006. – Т. 42, № 2. – C. 224–228.
114. Terry, L. A. Elicitors of induced resistance in postharvest horticultural
crops: a brief review / L. A. Terry, D. C. Joyce // Postharvest Biol. Technol. – 2004. –
Vol. 32. – P. 1–13.
115. Унрод, В. И. Новые достижения в исследовании хитина и хитозана /
В. И. Унрод, Ю. Г. Лега, Т. В. Солодовник. – М.: Изд. ВНИИРО, 2001. – 158 с.
166
116. Sorlier, P. Relation between the Degree of Acetylation and the Electrostatic
Properties of Chitin and Chitosan / P. Sorlier, A. Denusiere, C. Viton // Biomacromolecules. – 2001. – Vol. 2. – P. 765–772.
117. Антибактериальная активность водорастворимых низкомолекулярных хитозанов в отношении различных микроорганизмов / Д. В. Герасименко
[и др.] // Прикл. биохим. и микробиол. – 2004. – Т. 40, № 3. – С. 301–306.
118. Barka, E. A. Chitosan improves development, and protects Vitis vinifera L.
against Botrytis cinerea / E. A. Barka, P. Eullaffroy, C. Clement // Plant Cell
Reports. – 2004. – Vol. 22. – P. 608–614.
119. Зиновьева, С. В. Биохимические аспекты взаимодействия растений
с паразитическими нематодами (обзор) / С. В. Зиновьева, Н. И. Васюкова,
О. Л. Озерецковская // Прикл. биохимия и микробиология. – 2004. – Т. 40. –
С. 133–142.
120. Хитозан – регулятор фитофтороустойчивости картофеля / Е. А. Переход [и др.] // Доклады РАН. – 1997. – Т. 355. – С. 120–122.
121. Jiang, Y. M. Effect of chitosan coating on postharvest life and qualitily on
longan fruit / Y. M. Jiang, Y. B. Li // Food Chemistry. – 2001. – Vol. 73. – P. 139–143.
122. Chitin and Chitosan in Life Science / M. Sukwattanasinitt [et al.]; (Ed)
T. Uragami, K. Kurita, T. Fukumizo. – Yamaguchi Japan, 2001. – P. 198–201.
123. Biochemical and cytochemical aspects of the interactions of chitosan and
Botrytis cinerea in bell pepper fruit / E. A. El-Ghaouth [et al.] // Posthavest Biol.
Technol. – 1997. – Vol. 12. – P. 183–194.
124. Гольшин, Н. М. Новые средства защиты растений от болезней /
Н. М. Гольшин // Защита растений. – 1992. – № 8. – С. 50–54.
125. The application of chitin/chitosan for agriculture / T. Tsugita [et al.] // 7th
Symposium on Chitin and Chitosan. – Fukui, Japan. – 1993. – P. 21–22.
126. Chitosan for Improving Orchid Production and Quality / A. Uthairatanakij
[et al.] // Orchid Science and Biotechnology. – 2007. – Vol. 1, № 1. – P. 1–5.
127. Морозова, Е. А. Ризогенная активность хитозанового препарата, полученного из некондиционных цист Artemia sp., на примере семян льна-долгунца / Е. А. Морозова, А. Л. Верещагин // Ползуновский вестник. – 2008. –
№ 1–2. – C. 45–48.
128. Reduction of Transpiration through Foliar Application of Chitosan / M. Bittelli [et al.] // Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. – 2001. – Vol. 107. – P. 167–175.
129. Effects of chitin amendment of soil on microorganisms, nematodes, and
growth of white clover (Trifolium repens L.) and perennial ryegrass (Lolium peren-
ne L.) / S. U. Sarathchandra [et al.] // Biology and Fertility of soils. – 1996. – Vol. 22. –
P. 221–226.
130. Муллагалиев, И. Р. О деструкции хитозана под действием пероксида
водорода / И. Р. Муллагалиев, Г. Г. Галиаскарова // Докл. PАН. – 1995. – Т. 345,
№ 2. – С. 199–204.
131. Effect of chitosan on the biological properties of sweet basil (Ocimum basi-
licum L.) / H. J. Kim [et al.] // J. Agricul. Food Chem. – 2005. – Vol. 53. – P. 3696–3701.
167
132. Benhamou, N. Treatment with chitosan enhances resistance of tomato
plants to the crown and root pathogen Fusarium oxysporum F. sp. Radicis-lyco-
persici / N. Benhamou, G. Thériault // Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. – 1992. – Vol. 43. –
P. 34–52.
133. Controlling gray mould caused by Botrytis cinerea in cucumber plants by
means of chitosan / N. Ben-Shalom [et al.] // Crop Protection. – 2003. – Vol. 22. –
P. 285–290.
134. Photchanachai, S. Effects of chitosan seed treatment on Colletotrichum sp.
and seedling growth of chili cv. ‘Jinda’ / S. Photchanachai, J. Singkaew // Acta
Horticulturae. – 2006. – Vol. 712. – P. 585–590.
135. El Ghaouth, A. Antifungal activity of chitosan on two postharvest pathogens of strawberry fruits / A. El Ghaouth, J. Arul, J. Grenier // Phytopathology. –
1992. – Vol. 82. – P. 398–402.
136. Wojdyla, A. T. Chitosan (Biochikol 020 PC) in the control of some
ornamental foliage diseases / A. T. Wojdyla // Commun. Agricul. Appl. Biol. Sci. –
2004. – Vol. 69. – P. 705–715.
137. Effect of the combined application of chitosan and carbonic salts on the
incidence of anthracnose and the quality of papaya during storage / D. Sivakumar
[et al.] // J. Horticultural Sci. Biotech. – 2005. – Vol. 80. – P. 447–452.
138. Plant chitinases / D. B. Collinge [et al.] // Plant Journal. – 1993. – Vol. 3. –
P. 31–40.
139. Recommendations for naming plant pathogenesis-related Proteins / L. C. Van
Loon [et al.] // Plant Molecular Biology Reporter. – 1994. – Vol. 12. – P. 245–264.
140. Octadecanoid signaling component ‘burst’ in rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedling leaves upon wounding by cut and treatment with fungal elicitor chitosan / R. Rakwal [et al.] // Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. – 2002. – Vol. 295. – P. 1041–1045.
141. Mason, E. Defense Response in Slash Pine: Chitosan Treatment Alters the
Abundance of Specic mRNAs / E. Mason, M. Davis // Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. –
1997. – Vol. 10. – P. 135–137.
142. Ben-Shalom, N. Chitin and Chitosan in Life Science / N. Ben-Shalom.
N. Kudabeava, R. Pinto; (ed.) T. Uragami, K. Kurita, T. Fukumizo – Yamaguchi,
Japan, 2000. – P. 309–312.
143. Oligogalacturonides and chitosan activate plant defensive genes through
the octadecanoid pathway / S. H. Doares [et al.] // Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA. –
1995. – Vol. 92. – P. 4095–4098.
144. Dixon, R. A. Early events in the activation of plant defenses / R. A. Dixon,
M. J. Harrison, C. J. Lamb // Ann. Rev. Phytopath. – 1994. – Vol. 32. – P. 479–510.
145. Cuero, R. G. N-carboxymethyl chitosan inhibi-tion of aatoxin production:
role of zinc / R. G. Cuero, G. Osugi, A. Washington // Biotechnology Letters. –
1991. – Vol. 13. – P. 41–44.
146. Chitosan as a potential natural compound to control pre and postharvest
diseases of hor ticultural commodities / S. Bautista-Baños [et al.] // Crop Protection. –
2006. – Vol. 25. – P. 108–118.
168
147. Hadwiger, L. A. The mode of action of chitosan and its oligomers in indu-
cing pant promoters and developing disease resistance in plants / L. A. Hadwiger,
S. J. Klosterman, J. J. Choi // Adv. Chitin Science. – 2002. – Vol. 5. – P. 452–457.
148. Willmer, C. M. Stomata (2nd Edn) / C. M. Willmer, M. Fricker. – London,
Chapman and Hall, 1996. – 375 p.
149. Elicitor action via cell membrane of a cultured rice cell demonstrated
by the single-cell transient assay / M. Saito [et al.] // J. Biotechnol. – 2000. – Vol. 76,
№ 2–3. – P. 227–232.
150. Binding Site for Chitin Oligosaccharides in the Soybean Plasma Membrane /
R. B. Day [et al.] // Plant Physiol. – 2001. – Vol. 126, № 3. – P. 1162–1173.
151. Shibuya, N. Oligosaccharide signalling for defence responses in plant /
N. Shibuya, E. Minami // Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. – 2001. – Vol. 59. – P. 223–233.
152. Glycoconjugates as elicitors or suppressors of plant innate immunity /
A. Silipo [et al.] // Glycobiology. – 2010. – Vol. 120. – P. 406– 419.
153. LysM Receptor-Like Kinase Plays a Critical Role in Chitin Signaling and
Fungal Resistance in Arabidopsis / J. Wan [et al.] // Plant Cell. – 2008. – Vol. 20. –
P. 471–481.
154. Analysis of Two in Planta Expressed LysM Effector Homologs from the
Fungus Mycosphaerella graminicola Reveals Novel Functional Properties and
Varying Contributions to Virulence on Wheat / R. Marshall [et al.] // Plant Physiology. – 2011. – Vol. 156. – P. 756–769.
155. Plant cells recognize chitin fragments for defense signaling through a plasma membrane receptor / H. Kaku [et al.] // Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. – 2006. –
Vol. 103. – P. 11086 –11091.
156. Hadwiger, L. A. Localization of Fungal Components in the Pea-Fusarium
Interaction Detected Immunochemically with Antichitosan and Anti-fungal Cell
Wall Antisera / L. A. Hadwiger, J. M. Beckman // Plant Physiolog. – 1981. – Vol. 67. –
P. 170 –175.
157. Choi, J. J. A Comparison of the Effects of DNA-Damaging Agents and Biotic Elicitors on the Induction of Plant Defense Genes, Nuclear Distor tion, and Cell
Death / J. J. Choi, S. J. Klosterman // Plant Physiology. – 2001. – Vol. 125. – P. 752–762.
158. Young, D. H. Release of calcium from suspension-cultured Glycine max
cells by chitosan, other polycations, and polyamines in relation to effect on memrane
permeability / D. H. Young, H. Kauss // Plant Physiolog. – 1983. – Vol. 73. – P. 698–702.
159. Octadecanoid signaling component ‘burst’ in rice (Oryza sativa L .)
seedling leaves upon wounding by cut and treatment with fungal elicitor chitosan /
R. Rakwal [et al.] // Biochem. Biophys. Res. Com. – 2002. – Vol. 295. – P. 1041–1045.
160. Hydrogen peroxide mediates defence reponses induced by chitosans of different molecular weights in rice / W. Lin [et al.] // J. Plant Physiol. – 2005. – Vol. 162,
№ 8. – P. 937–944.
161. Влияние хитозана на системную вирусную инфекцию и некоторые
защитные реакции в растениях картофеля / С. Н. Чирков [и др.] // Физиол.
раст. – 2001. – Т. 48, вып. 6. – С. 890–896.
169
162. Чирков, С. Н. Сравнительная эффективность производных хитозана
при подавлении вирусной инфекции растений / С. Н. Чирков [и др.] // Докл.
РАН. – 1998. – Т. 360, № 2. – C. 271–273.
163. Hadwiger, L. A. Chitosan polymer sizes effective in inducing phytoalexin
accumulation and fungal suppression are veried with synthesized oligomers /
L. A. Hadwiger, T. Ogawa // Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. – 1994. – Vol. 7. – P. 531–533.
164. Okada, M. High-Afnity Binding Proteins for N – Acetylchitooligosaccharide Elicitor in the Plasma Membranes from Wheat, Barley and Carrot Cells:
Conserved Presence and Correlation with the Responsiveness to the Elicitor /
M. Okada, M. Matsumura, Y. Ito // Plant Cell Physiol. – 2002. – Vol. 43. – P. 505–512.
165. Comparison of the Ability of Partially N-Acetylated Chitosans and
Chitooligosaccharides to Elicit Resistance Reactions in Wheat Leaves / P. Vander
[et al.] // Plant Physiol. – 1998. – Vol. 118, № 4. – P. 1353–1359.
166. Shibuya, N. Identication of a novel high-afnity binding site for N-acetylchitooligosaccharide elicitor in the membrane fraction from suspension-cultured
rice cells / N. Shibuya, H. Kaku, K. Kuchitsu // FEBS Lett. – 1993. – Vol. 329, № 1–2. –
P. 75–78.
167. Induction Patterns of Chitinases in Yam Callus by Inoculation with Autoclaved Fusarium oxyspor um, Ethylene, and Chitin and Chitosan Oligosaccharides /
D. Koga [et al.] // Biosci. Biotech. Biochem. – 1992. – Vol. 56. – P. 280–285.
168. Inui, H. Elicitor actions of N-acetylchito-oligosaccharides and laminarioligosaccharides for chitinase and L-phenylalanine ammonia-lyase induction in rice
suspension culture / H. Inui, Y. Yamaguchi, S. Hirano // Biosci. Biotech. Biochem. –
1997. – Vol. 61. – P. 975–978.
169. Two novel genes rapidly and transiently activated in suspension-cultured
rice cells by treatment with N-acetylchitoheptaose, a biotic elicitor for phytoalexin
production / E. Minami [et al.] // Plant Cell Physiol. – 1996. – Vol. 37, № 4. – P. 563–567.
170. Khan, W. Chitosan and chitin oligomers increase phenylalanine ammonialyase and tyrosine ammonia-lyase activities in soybean leaves / W. Khan, B. Prithiviraj, D. L. Smith // J. Plant Physiol. – 2003. – Vol. 160. – P. 859–863.
171. Sebti, I. Chitosan polymer as bioactive coating and lm against Aspergillus
niger contamination / I. Sebti [et al.] // J. Food Sci. – 2005. – Vol. 70. – P. 100–104.
172. Тютерев, С. Л. Молекулярные механизмы действия хитозана в качестве средства, повышающего болезнеустойчивость растений / С. Л. Тютерев //
Современные перспективы в исследовании хитина и хитозана: материалы
7 Междунар. конф. – М.: ВНИРО, 2003. – С. 118–121.
173. Bean rust biological control using bacterial agents / G. Y. Yuen [et al.] //
Crop Protection. – 2001. – Vol. 20. – Р. 395 –402.
174. Иммунорегулирующее действие элиситоров и супрессоров / Н. И. Васюкова [и др.] // Современные перспективы в исследовании хитина и хитозана:
материалы 8-й Междунар. конф. – Казань, 12–17 июня 2006 г. – М: ВНИРО. –
C. 174.
175. Grazebrook, J. Contrasting mechanisms of defense against biotrophic and
necrotrophic pathogens / J. Grazebrook // Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. – 2005. – Vol. 43. –
P. 205–227.
170
Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]