Добавил:
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Political communications. Lecture course. Курс лекций

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
06.09.2026
Размер:
1 Мб
Скачать
Their achievements in this area later formed the basis of mod­ern propaganda theory. It is noteworthy that in the midst of the confrontation in August 1943, the allies of the USSR in the anti-Hitler coalition had already begun to discuss the post-war order of the world. And in it the Soviet Union was to remain weakened. Therefore, immediately after the end of the Second World War, Western countries began the Cold War against the USSR, which was mainly informational.
Despite the initial parity in strength, after a while the Sovi­et Union lost ground.
In the Council on Foreign Relations of the United States, the General Staff of the information war against the USSR was created, which set the goal for the British-American intelli­gence services to seek and promote people in the Soviet nomen­clature who could contribute to the collapse of the USSR. Such a person was, for example, M. Gorbachev.
These and other actions of the West eventually led to the loss of the USSR in this information war, and, ultimately, to the collapse of the country. The world has become unipolar.
A kind of ABC of propaganda was formulated in a systemat­ic manner in the United States in the late 1930s at the Institute for Propaganda Analysis and included seven specific implemen­tation methods (Tab. 2.1).
Table 2.1
Seven specific implementation methods (R. Hobbs, S. McGee)
Technology name Interpretation Example
Name Calling
Band Wagon
Trick to make us accept
a conclusion without full
consideration of essential
facts in the case
A trick used to seize our
emotions, to make us
follow the political Pied
Pipers and bring others
along with us
41
Father Coughlin calls
President Franklin
D. Roosevelt “a liar”
Everybody’s doing it
The end of table 2.1
Technology name Interpretation Example
An attempt to sway
emotions through the
Glittering Gener-
alities
Flag Wav-
ing / Тransfer
“Plain Folks”
Testimonial
Stacking the Cards
use of shining ideals or virtues, such as freedom, justice, truth, education,
democracy in a large,
general way
A trick in which the
propagandist holds up
a symbol, such a flag,
that we recognized and
respect.
A trick in which
the propagandist
demonstrates they are
like the rest of us or just
plain folk
Best represented by the
straw vote, this trick
involves getting not
only good, plain, solid citizens, but also social and business leaders to
endorse the party or the
candidate
A trick in which
the propagandist
intentionally or
unintentionally stacks
the cards against the
facts
“What America needs”,
says Roosevelt, “is
economic security for all”
Roosevelt made a symbol
of the horse and buggy
when he spoke of an anti
New Deal Supreme Court
decision
It is proverbial that political candidates
always kiss babies
If large numbers of
individuals can be seen
voting for Roosevelt or
for Landon, it is likely
to cause many additional
votes for them
In 1936, with unemploy-
ment still the serious issue in America, the
Republican propagandists
blames the Democrats for
not ending it
The specificity of propaganda technologies consists in the following aspects. First, propaganda is based on the desire to suppress the reactions of the mind, to influence feelings and emotions; it appeals only to those assessments that are shared by the majority of the population. Secondly, it is implement­ed on the simplification and multiple replication of evaluative
42
reactions, introduction of assessments by contrasting the po­sitions of competitors. The most important role and stability in the political market are provided for propaganda by symbol­ization and elements of counter-propaganda in the information space. The functions of propaganda are numerous and are at the root of any ruling regime:
• management of interpretations of events based on the re­cipient’s conviction of the legitimacy of the views and positions of the communicator, restructuring of the receivers’ conscious­ness; in public policy, it tries to set completely definite pat­terns of thinking, assessing or diagnosing events to the mass audience in order to ensure ideological control and unification of the political thinking of citizens;
• practical activation of consciousness, translation of knowledge and ideas of a political actor into the sphere of be­havioral motivation;
• the fight against ideological opponents, the neutraliza­tion of hostile actions, when the structure and content of the propaganda influence are deliberately built in such a way as to suppress the political positions of opponents, to reduce the mobilizing effect of their programs, goals, values; in extreme cases, the propaganda design of the ideological struggle leads not only to the polarization of political discourse in society, but also to the transfer of this atmosphere of tension from the po­litical sphere to other types of social relations, including the private life of a person.
A large number of types can be found in propaganda stud­ies. We will offer a mixed typology with some explanations and examples of some of their types.
propaganda by action (involving the use of various types of intimidation of the recipient, as well as topics that are pain­fully perceived by the audience, for example, memories of de­feats in wars or political battles); it is primarily associated with acts of violence perpetrated by proponents of insurrectionary anarchism in the late 19th and early 20th century, including bombings and assassinations aimed at the ruling class:
43
April 4, 1866 – Dmitry Karakozov makes an unsuccessful attempt on the life of Tsar Alexander II of Russia at the gates of the Summer Garden in St. Petersburg
• ideological propaganda (dissemination of certain systems of values, goals, “national ideas” and other ideas aimed at inte­grating society as a whole or individual political groups or com­munities):
• positive propaganda that carries and disseminates posi­tive and constructive ideas for the whole society:
44
• negative propaganda spreading biased ideas and know­ingly causing damage (psychological and other) to certain seg­ments of the population:
• sociological propaganda (the use of elements of the every­day subject environment to create often unconscious ideologi­cal or political preferences of people):
45
• propaganda by means of art (trying to create a system of subjective attachments, internal adherence, ideological in­volvement of people to certain doctrines, concepts or goals us­ing the means of monumental architecture, painting, graphics, posters and even music);
• scientific propaganda (conducted on the basis of scien­tific doctrines and concepts with the application of conclusions and recommendations arising from their content);
• retal (mass) propaganda (designed to interact with a mass object, a wide social audience and involving the use of special
46
structures, institutions and mechanisms for disseminating information: the media, special departments, etc.) and axial propaganda (work with a narrow, specially selected part of the population);
• direct (explicit) propaganda (use of public statements, appeals, openly sounding criticism of opponents, self-promo­tion, etc.) and implicit propaganda (indirect impact on the au­dience, the technology of using various subtexts, allegories, hidden hints, etc.).
Sometimes you can find such types of propaganda as “white,
gray and black”.
“White” propaganda is conducted on behalf of the acting actor when disclosing sources and forms of information dissem­ination.
“Gray” propaganda is based on concealment of the source of information and the use of information technologies that function on the verge of public decency and are regarded by so­ciety as unworthy.
• “Black” propaganda presumes the use of technologies and methods of falsification and disinformation that violate the moral and ethical, and sometimes legal norms of a society.
Despite various attempts to give classifications of accept­able or conventional and unacceptable forms, we note that in practice they are almost never intertwined in their pure form.
The practical implementation of different types of political propaganda is obtained through the use of modern technologies that do not reject the classical ones (the ABC of propaganda), but complement them. So, modern propaganda technologies in­clude:
• focusing public attention on unimportant events (while the main goal is to distract the audience from “inconvenient” or unpopular topics);
• information shaft (“white noise”); this technology in­volves masking the “main” message by mentioning many differ­ent news and topics without any evaluative comments, as well
47
as information fragmentation (e.g. listing in the news statistics
on coronavirus in the country, opening of the Crimean bridge af­ter snowfalls, court hearing in the Navalny case, thaw – weath­er, celebration on February 23);
• false analogies (such technology is based on incorrect as­sociations and comparisons, for example, comparing Putin and Hitler);
• so-called objective approach is based on the conscious construction of facts with a biased selection of facts and points of view; so, in the modern world at the regional and global level, the most popular questions are about the polarity of the world, the role of international law, and the answers to these questions are extremely contradictory;
• semantic manipulation involves a careful selection and a special arrangement of concepts that cause either positive or negative associations, which allows us to influence the per­ception of information (we are fighters for the independence,
prosperity of Russia, they are occupiers, enslavers of the peo­ple; behind us all progressive humanity, common people, behind them – oligarchs, bandits, officials);
• use of slang and jargon, vernacular, metaphors and hy­perbole, idioms,
• distribution of government clips, production of films with “exposure” of opponents, organization of political debates and conferences of spectators, use of administrative resources in the formation of political discourse.
In addition, Robert Cole’s The International Encyclopedia
of Propaganda highlights many other methods of propaganda:
• • “Going personal” (ad hominem) – an attack on the op­ponent himself, not his arguments. There is a translation of po­litical discussions into a moral plane.
• “Appeal to fear”.
• “ppeal to prejudice”.
• “Repetition” (ad nauseam) – regardless of whether the in­formation is true or not, a person will believe in it if it is repeated repeatedly. This principle was formulated by Joseph Goebbels.
48
• “Big Lie” – a complete lie, clear disinformation. This technique was recorded by Adolf Hitler in the book “My Strug­gle”. According to him, it is necessary to resort to a lie so huge that everyone thinks that it is impossible to lie so blatantly. For example, the Nazis convinced the German people that in the Middle Ages, Jews killed Christian children and used their blood to make bread for Easter.
• “Black-and-white fallacy” – in this case, only two options are presented to choose from, for example, “you are either with us or against us...”. At the same time, “with us” is positioned as the best possible outcome.
• “Default” or “selective truth”.
• “Cognitive dissonance”. This technology forces people to be consistent, otherwise there will be a feeling of psychological discomfort.
• “Demonizing the enemy”. This technique is an appeal to fear.
• “Disinformation” – a direct forgery of photographs, sound recordings, printed documents, and so on.
• “Euphemism” is a word that replaces another, uncom­fortable for this situation or rude, obscene. Thanks to euphe­misms, a person or phenomenon is discredited.
• “Foot in the door” – a social contract, according to which a service is returned for a service.
• “Quotes taken out of context”.
• “Scapegoat”.
• “Slogans”.
• “Unstated assumption”.
• “Undeniable truth” (thought-terminating cliche).
• “Guilt by association”.
The methods of perception and reflection of information created by propaganda find practical implementation through the implementation of another non-marketing form – Agita- tion. It is the next stage in achieving the goals of propaganda, and can often be interpreted as part of propaganda, since it is also aimed at controlling the mind of the recipient. Its main
49
priority is not all, but only certain elements of human thinking, those that are “responsible” for prompting the practical activ­ities of people. Agitation, to an even greater extent than prop­aganda, is projected onto the use of the emotional components of the recipients’ consciousness. The main ideological material with which agitation “works” is concentrated mainly in the pro­gram documents of parties and governments, political demands and directives, slogans and appeals.
In the arsenal of modern technologies of political agitation, one can single out the following:
• combining verbal and visual means of conveying infor­mation, which enhances the impact of political ideas and goals on various segments of the population;
• overcoming (blocking, displacing to the periphery of con­sciousness) disturbing information;
• activation of people’s sensory perception of potential
danger (fear);
• “Stunning” con­sciousness when referring to certain “painful” points of the audience (negative memories and other ideas that create inner discom­fort);
• mechanisms of “fil­tering” (removing certain information from memory into the area of active con­sciousness)
• identification mech­anisms (involving the projection or assignment of negative assessments to the enemy, and positive ones to oneself);
• associative methods,
• NLP;
50