Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_4586_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
05.09.2026
Размер:
18 Мб
Скачать
Treatment ofEpiglottic Collapse
https://t.me/medicina_free
withPositional Therapy
MickeyLeentjens, PattyE.Vonk, andNicode Vries
18.1 Introduction
It has been found that the majority of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) have a higher frequency and duration of apneic events in the supine position [13]. In literature, many denitions of position-dependent OSA (POSA) have been applied. The most common approach is to categorize patients in two groups: positional (PP) and non-positional (NPP) OSA patients [1, 2, 4, 5]. In PP, apneic events appear almost exclusively in supine position and the severity of disease is to a large extent dependent on the time spent sleeping in this posture [1, 2, 69]. Patients are classied as being NPP or PP using modied versions of Cartwright’s criteria [1]. In this denition, there should be a difference of 50% or more in apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) between supine and non-supine positions with a total sleeping time in worst sleeping position of >10% and<90%. In PP, a fur­ther distinction can be made between supine isolated OSA (non-supine AHI <5 events/hour) and supine predominant OSA (non-supine AHI 5 events/hour) [10, 11].
Overall, 56% to 75% of patients with OSA are classied as being positional [2,
3, 7, 9, 12]. POSA is in particular prevalent in mild to moderate OSA, as the
18
M. Leentjens (*) Department of Otorhinolaryngology, OLVG, location West, Amsterdam, The Netherlands e-mail: M.Leentjens@olvg.nl
P. E. Vonk Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
N. de Vries Jan Tooropstraat, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands e-mail: n.vries@olvg.nl
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 M. Delakorda, N. de Vries (eds.), The Role of Epiglottis in Obstructive Sleep Apnea, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34992-8_18
247
248
https://t.me/medicina_free
majority of PP (70–80%) is aficted with this form [2, 7, 8, 13]. In addition, the prevalence of POSA decreases as the severity of OSA increases. There are also several studies that have shown clinical differences in patient characteristics between PP and NPP.For example, PP are younger and have a lower body mass index (BMI) compared with NPP [2, 7, 8, 14]. In addition, the prevalence of POSA is higher in Asian populations [1517].
M. Leentjens et al.
18.2 Epiglottic Collapse inPP
In PP, the severity of OSA is to a large extent dependent on the total sleeping time (TST) spent in the supine position. The effect of gravitational forces on the upper airway (UA) when adopting the supine position is thought to be responsible for the increase in UA collapse observed in this position [18]. One of the structures which can be responsible for UA narrowing and obstruction is the epiglottis.
As discussed in Part 2 of this book, many different denitions of epiglottic collapse (EC) are used. An EC can occur in two congurations: anteroposterior (A-P) or, less common, lateral. An A-P collapse can result in posterior displace­ment of the entire epiglottis against the posterior pharyngeal wall due to various causes. First, an EC can occur isolated in A-P conguration, which is also called a oppy epiglottis (FE) or trapdoor phenomenon. This collapse pattern often appears to be related to decreased structural rigidity of the epiglottis. Second, an EC can be secondary to an A-P collapse of the tongue base. Less common is a secondary collapse of the epiglottis due to a vallecular cyst. Third, a lateral col­lapse can be caused by anatomical variation or due to underdevelopment of the epiglottis itself.
It has been suggested that a collapse at this level, in particular FE, is inuenced by sleeping position and seems to occur more often in the supine position compared to non-supine position [19, 20]. The increased usage of DISE and performing this procedure in different body positions have given more insight into the involvement of the epiglottis in OSA, with in particular an isolated EC (e.g., FE). In a study by Vonk etal., the authors observed that a FE seems to be a position-dependent phe­nomenon. This study showed that this phenomenon appears almost exclusively in the supine position and to a lesser extent during lateral head (and trunk) rota­tion [21].
Previously, several studies had already shown that base of tongue and epiglottic collapse are more common in PP [7, 22]. Victores etal. found an overall improve­ment in UA collapse in PP while moving to lateral sleep position, this in contrast to NPP. Moreover, the biggest improvement of UA obstruction in PP involved the tongue base and epiglottis [19]. In addition, Saruddin etal. examined the inuence of different head positions during DISE in patients with OSA and PP.They observed a positive effect of lateral head rotation on UA patency in EC, predominantly in PP [23].
18 Treatment ofEpiglottic Collapse withPositional Therapy
https://t.me/medicina_free
249
18.3 Treatment Options forEC
Over the past few years, interest in EC has been increasing. However, treatment of patients with a FE remains challenging. A variety of treatment methods have been attempted to resolve this, but both conservative and surgical treatment are hampered by differences in success rates and possible complications accompanied with surgi­cal interventions. As discussed in the previous chapters of this part of the book, conservative treatment includes continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), man­dibular advancement device (MAD) treatment, and to a lesser extent myofunctional therapy.
Besides conventional treatments, several surgical techniques have been applied to resolve an EC and will be described in Part 4. Various small-scale studies have been published about techniques, success rates, and complications of epiglottis sur­gery [2426]. Many sleep surgeons are hesitant to embark on epiglottis surgery, because of the risk of irreversible dysphagia after partial or total epiglottectomy. The risk of sequelae must be weighed individually, depending on, for example, the severity of the disease.
18.4 Positional Therapy
Positional therapy (PT) aims at preventing patients from sleeping in supine position. Various techniques have been described. The majority of studies on PT use the old fashioned, so-called tennis-ball technique (TBT) [12]. This technique uses a passive object, a bulky mass, which is strapped to the patients’ back avoiding them from sleeping in the supine position. The advantage of TBT is that it is a simple and inex­pensive treatment. More importantly, it has proven its effectiveness in reducing the percentage of TST in supine position and therefore the total AHI in PP. However, the long-term compliance of TBT is poor. The poor compliance can be mainly explained by backache, discomfort and no improvement, or even deterioration, of sleep quality and daytime alertness [27]. Another drawback is the inability to do anything else in bed with such device installed, e.g., read, which means it must be installed just before actually falling asleep. Compliance rates of TBT reported in literature range from 40 to 70% short-term to only 10% long-term [12, 28, 29]. This old school positional therapy is therefore obsolete and should be discouraged.
Hereafter, a new generation of small, lightweight, battery-powered vibro-tactile devices was developed. These devices are either worn around the chest or secured to the skin of the neck [30, 31]. When the supine position is identied, these devices provide a vibrating stimulus aiming to turn the patient to a non-supine sleeping position. Several studies have shown that PT with new-generation devices is effec­tive in reducing the percentage of supine sleep in PP as well [3235]. Data for stud­ies reporting on the effect of new-generation devices for PT were combined in a
250
https://t.me/medicina_free
M. Leentjens et al.
recent meta-analysis [35]. The pooled mean reduction in AHI was 11.3 events/hour (54%) and the pooled mean reduction in percentage of TST in supine position was
33.6%; a mean difference of 84% [35]. Short-term compliance is high, varying from 76% to 96%, when dened as at least 4h of use per night during 7days a week [4,
31, 34]. Long-term compliance is varying among studies between 64.4% and 75.5%
[33, 36]. In another study, the proportion of patients using their device more than 4h during 5days a week after 12months of follow-up was 100% [37].
18.4.1 The Amsterdam Positional Obstructive Sleep
Apnea Classification
To determine which patients are suitable candidates for PT, the Amsterdam Positional Obstructive Sleep Apnea Classication (APOC) was introduced [8]. This classication system gives a description of patients who probably will or will not achieve clinical improvement of their OSA with PT. The APOC discriminates between three categories: the true PP, the NPP, and the multifactorial patient (Fig. 18.1). The true PP can be cured by PT alone and is categorized as APOC I. Patients categorized as APOC II or III could benet from PT, but will not be cured. These patients may benet from a combination of PT with, for example, less invasive UA surgery, or a MAD.Obviously, the NPP will not benet from PT since the severity of OSA is not inuenced by sleeping position.
OSA &
>10% in WSP & BSP?
yes
Lower OSA severity
AHI in BSP < 5?
yes yes
APOC I
cured
Fig. 18.1 Flow chart for the Amsterdam Positional Obstructive Apnea Classication (APOC). The red boxes show the best possible outcome for these patients with successful positional therapy (PT)
category in BSP than
overall OSA category?
APOC II
new treatment options
Overall AHI 40 &
AHI in BSP 2.5% reduced
compared to overall AHI
yes
APOC III
improved
quality of life and/or
improved compliance
18 Treatment ofEpiglottic Collapse withPositional Therapy
https://t.me/medicina_free
251
18.5 EC andPT
As described earlier in this chapter, it has been suggested that obstruction by an isolated EC is enhanced by sleeping position and occurs more often in the supine position compared to non-supine position [19, 20]. Vonk etal. described that a FE appears almost exclusively in the supine position [21]. Therefore, avoiding the supine position might be a rational and promising option that could be used as a standalone treatment in patients with a FE.
As mentioned above, the multifactorial patient could benet from PT, as the severity of disease is inuenced, in part, by sleeping position. In APOC II, the patients have a best sleeping position (BSP) AHI in a lower OSA severity category than the overall AHI.Theoretically, the patients can decrease overall AHI and OSA severity category when treated with PT.Consequently, patients could potentially be treated with less aggressive treatment. Studies report that 42–75% of NPP improve to less severe PP after UA surgery [32, 3844]. The effect of UA surgery is thought to be greater in the lateral position. This might result in residual OSA in the supine position post-surgery. In patients with partial effective surgery, additional treatment with PT could be offered as adjuvant therapy. Catalfumo etal. evaluated 104 patients who underwent uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP) with postoperative persistent OSA.Using awake beroptic endoscopy, they observed 11.5% of these patients to have an abnormal position of the epiglottis as it was pushed against the posterior pharyngeal wall further down into the laryngeal inlet during inspiration [24]. Patients with a postoperative persistent EC could benet from PT, as the epiglottis has previously been identied as a primary site to improve in the lateral position [19]. Several studies observed benecial effect of adjuvant PT in patients with post­operative persistent POSA [32, 40].
In APOC III, patients have an overall AHI of at least 40 events/hour and at least a 25% lower BSP AHI.CPAP is undoubtedly regarded as the gold standard treat­ment in these patients. The patient would remain in the same OSA severity category when avoiding the supine position, but as the AHI decreases, so does the CPAP pressure needed, which potentially leads to better compliance. In case the patient does not tolerate CPAP or MAD, PT can be considered as salvage therapy since this could lower the AHI.
18.6 Further Considerations
There are a few considerations that need to be kept in mind when choosing PT as a treatment option. As described above, the distinction between PP and NPP is cru­cial. The NPP patient will not benet from PT, since UA narrowing will be present in both supine and non-supine sleeping position. Also, patients are not good candi­dates for PT when they are unable to sleep in the lateral position due to physical discomfort (e.g., neck or shoulder problems) or any other disabilities that interfere when sleeping in lateral position. It is important to take into account that the effec­tiveness of a treatment depends not only on the effect on UA obstruction, but also
252
https://t.me/medicina_free
M. Leentjens et al.
on compliance. Last, PT may not be the treatment of choice when the patient’s main complaint is snoring in all body positions.
18.7 Conclusion
In this chapter, we described the role of the epiglottis in PP.For PP, avoiding the supine position is key. A primary EC (e.g., FE), not secondary to collapse of the base of tongue, is a phenomenon that appears almost exclusively in supine position and disappears when the patient is positioned in lateral position [21]. Therefore, these patients are suitable candidates for PT.Also, tongue base and epiglottic col­lapse have been shown to improve in the lateral position [7, 22]. The multifactorial patient could also benet from PT, by going down in OSA class (APOC II) or a decrease in AHI (APOC III). Postoperative residual POSA, which may possibly be due to an EC, can be a good indication for additional PT as well.
References
1. Cartwright RD.Effect of sleep position on sleep apnea severity. Sleep. 1984;7(2):110–4.
2. Oksenberg A, Silverberg DS, Arons E, Radwan H. Positional vs nonpositional obstructive sleep apnea patients: anthropomorphic, nocturnal polysomnographic, and multiple sleep latency test data. Chest. 1997;112(3):629–39.
3. Ravesloot MJ, Frank MH, van Maanen JP, Verhagen EA, de Lange J, de Vries N.Positional OSA part 2: retrospective cohort analysis with a new classication system (APOC). Sleep Breath. 2016;20(2):881–8.
4. Eijsvogel MM, Ubbink R, Dekker J, Oppersma E, de Jongh FH, van der Palen J, etal. Sleep position trainer versus tennis ball technique in positional obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. J Clin Sleep Med. 2015;11(2):139–47.
5. Marklund M, Persson M, Franklin KA.Treatment success with a mandibular advancement device is related to supine-dependent sleep apnea. Chest. 1998;114(6):1630–5.
6. Oksenberg A, Gadoth N. Are we missing a simple treatment for most adult sleep apnea patients? The avoidance of the supine sleep position. J Sleep Res. 2014;23(2):204–10.
7. Richard W, Kox D, den Herder C, Laman M, van Tinteren H, de Vries N.The role of sleep posi­tion in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2006;263(10):946–50.
8. Frank MH, Ravesloot MJ, van Maanen JP, Verhagen E, de Lange J, de Vries N.Positional OSA part 1: towards a clinical classication system for position-dependent obstructive sleep apnoea. Sleep Breath. 2015;19(2):473–80.
9. Heinzer R, Petitpierre NJ, Marti-Soler H, Haba-Rubio J.Prevalence and characteristics of posi­tional sleep apnea in the HypnoLaus population-based cohort. Sleep Med. 2018;48:157–62.
10. Kim KT, Cho YW, Kim DE, Hwang SH, Song ML, Motamedi GK.Two subtypes of posi­tional obstructive sleep apnea: supine-predominant and supine-isolated. Clin Neurophysiol. 2016;127(1):565–70.
11. Lee SA, Paek JH, Chung YS, Kim WS.Clinical features in patients with positional obstructive sleep apnea according to its subtypes. Sleep Breath. 2017;21(1):109–17.
12. Ravesloot MJ, van Maanen JP, Dun L, de Vries N.The undervalued potential of positional therapy in position-dependent snoring and obstructive sleep apnea-a review of the literature. Sleep Breath. 2013;17(1):39–49.
13. Mador MJ, Kufel TJ, Magalang UJ, Rajesh SK, Watwe V, Grant BJ.Prevalence of positional sleep apnea in patients undergoing polysomnography. Chest. 2005;128(4):2130–7.
18 Treatment ofEpiglottic Collapse withPositional Therapy
https://t.me/medicina_free
14. Itasaka Y, Miyazaki S, Ishikawa K, Togawa K.The inuence of sleep position and obesity on sleep apnea. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2000;54(3):340–1.
15. Mo JH, Lee CH, Rhee CS, Yoon IY, Kim JW.Positional dependency in Asian patients with obstructive sleep apnea and its implication for hypertension. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011;137(8):786–90.
16. Teerapraipruk B, Chirakalwasan N, Simon R, Hirunwiwatkul P, Jaimchariyatam N, Desudchit T, etal. Clinical and polysomnographic data of positional sleep apnea and its predictors. Sleep Breath. 2012;16(4):1167–72.
17. Tanaka F, Nakano H, Sudo N, Kubo C.Relationship between the body position-specic apnea­hypopnea index and subjective sleepiness. Respiration. 2009;78(2):185–90.
18. Oksenberg A, Silverberg DS.The effect of body posture on sleep-related breathing disorders: facts and therapeutic implications. Sleep Med Rev. 1998;2(3):139–62.
19. Victores AJ, Hamblin J, Gilbert J, Switzer C, Takashima M. Usefulness of sleep endos­copy in predicting positional obstructive sleep apnea. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;150(3):487–93.
20. Marques M, Genta PR, Sands SA, Azarbazin A, de Melo C, Taranto-Montemurro L, etal. Effect of sleeping position on upper airway patency in obstructive sleep apnea is determined by the pharyngeal structure causing collapse. Sleep. 2017;40(3):zsx005.
21. Vonk PE, Ravesloot MJL, Kasius KM, van Maanen JP, de Vries N.Floppy epiglottis during drug-induced sleep endoscopy: an almost complete resolution by adopting the lateral posture. Sleep Breath. 2020;24(1):103–9.
22. Ravesloot MJ, de Vries N.One hundred consecutive patients undergoing drug-induced sleep endoscopy: results and evaluation. Laryngoscope. 2011;121(12):2710–6.
23. Saruddin F, Koutsourelakis I, de Vries N.Analysis of the inuence of head rotation during drug-induced sleep endoscopy in obstructive sleep apnea. Laryngoscope. 2014;124(9):2195–9.
24. Catalfumo FJ, Golz A, Westerman ST, Gilbert LM, Joachims HZ, Goldenberg D.The epiglot­tis and obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome. J Laryngol Otol. 1998;112(10):940–3.
25. Golz A, Goldenberg D, Westerman ST, Catalfumo FJ, Netzer A, Westerman LM, etal. Laser partial epiglottidectomy as a treatment for obstructive sleep apnea and laryngomalacia. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2000;109(12 Pt 1):1140–5.
26. Bourolias C, Hajiioannou J, Sobol E, Velegrakis G, Helidonis E.Epiglottis reshaping using CO2 laser: a minimally invasive technique and its potent applications. Head Face Med. 2008;4:15.
27. Ravesloot MJL, Benoist L, van Maanen P, de Vries N. Novel positional devices for the treatment of positional obstructive sleep apnea, and how this relates to sleep surgery. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;80:28–36.
28. Oksenberg A, Silverberg D, Offenbach D, Arons E.Positional therapy for obstructive sleep apnea patients: a 6-month follow-up study. Laryngoscope. 2006;116(11):1995–2000.
29. Bignold JJ, Deans-Costi G, Goldsworthy MR, Robertson CA, McEvoy D, Catcheside PG, etal. Poor long-term patient compliance with the tennis ball technique for treating positional obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin Sleep Med. 2009;5(5):428–30.
30. van Maanen JP, Richard W, Van Kesteren ER, Ravesloot MJ, Laman DM, Hilgevoord AA, etal. Evaluation of a new simple treatment for positional sleep apnoea patients. J Sleep Res. 2012;21(3):322–9.
31. Levendowski DJ, Seagraves S, Popovic D, Westbrook PR. Assessment of a neck-based treatment and monitoring device for positional obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin Sleep Med. 2014;10(8):863–71.
32. Benoist LBL, Verhagen M, Torensma B, van Maanen JP, de Vries N.Positional therapy in patients with residual positional obstructive sleep apnea after upper airway surgery. Sleep Breath. 2017;21(2):279–88.
33. van Maanen JP, de Vries N. Long-term effectiveness and compliance of positional therapy with the sleep position trainer in the treatment of positional obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Sleep. 2014;37(7):1209–15.
34. van Maanen JP, Meester KA, Dun LN, Koutsourelakis I, Witte BI, Laman DM, etal. The sleep position trainer: a new treatment for positional obstructive sleep apnoea. Sleep Breath. 2013;17(2):771–9.
253
254
https://t.me/medicina_free
35. Ravesloot MJL, White D, Heinzer R, Oksenberg A, Pepin JL.Efcacy of the new generation of devices for positional therapy for patients with positional obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. J Clin Sleep Med. 2017;13(6):813–24.
36. Laub RR, Tonnesen P, Jennum PJ.A sleep position trainer for positional sleep apnea: a ran­domized, controlled trial. J Sleep Res. 2017;26(5):641–50.
37. de Ruiter MHT, Benoist LBL, de Vries N, de Lange J.Durability of treatment effects of the sleep position trainer versus oral appliance therapy in positional OSA: 12-month follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Sleep Breath. 2018;22(2):441–50.
38. Lee CH, Kim SW, Han K, Shin JM, Hong SL, Lee JE, etal. Effect of uvulopalatopharyn­goplasty on positional dependency in obstructive sleep apnea. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011;137(7):675–9.
39. Kastoer C, Benoist LBL, Dieltjens M, Torensma B, de Vries LH, Vonk PE, etal. Comparison of upper airway collapse patterns and its clinical signicance: drug-induced sleep endoscopy in patients without obstructive sleep apnea, positional and non-positional obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep Breat. 2018;22(4):939–48.
40. van Maanen JP, Witte BI, de Vries N.Theoretical approach towards increasing effectiveness of palatal surgery in obstructive sleep apnea: role for concomitant positional therapy? Sleep Breath. 2014;18(2):341–9.
41. Lee YC, Eun YG, Shin SY, Kim SW.Change in position dependency in non-responders after multilevel surgery for obstructive sleep apnea: analysis of polysomnographic parameters. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;271(5):1081–5.
42. Li HY, Cheng WN, Chuang LP, Fang TJ, Hsin LJ, Kang CJ, etal. Positional dependency and surgical success of relocation pharyngoplasty among patients with severe obstructive sleep apnea. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;149(3):506–12.
43. van Maanen JP, Ravesloot MJ, Witte BI, Grijseels M, de Vries N.Exploration of the relation­ship between sleep position and isolated tongue base or multilevel surgery in obstructive sleep apnea. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;269(9):2129–36.
44. Katsantonis GP, Miyazaki S, Walsh JK.Effects of uvulopalatopharyngoplasty on sleep archi­tecture and patterns of obstructed breathing. Laryngoscope. 1990;100(10 Pt 1):1068–72.
M. Leentjens et al.
Part V
https://t.me/medicina_free
Surgical Treatment of Epiglottis Collapse
Epiglottectomy
https://t.me/medicina_free
19
BhikT.Kotecha
19.1 Introduction
Hypopharynx is a challenging anatomical upper airway segment from a surgical perspective. It is crucial that the evaluation of the obstructive upper airway is con­ducted very carefully in order to identify exactly where the problem is. Drug­induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) has been pivotal in the evaluation process of the upper airway obstruction [1, 2]. This technique allows a three-dimensional visuali­sation of the dynamic upper airway during sedation and enables identication of the epiglottic obstruction be this as the only obstructive element or indeed as part of multi-level obstruction and this is particularly important in patients who have failed CPAP therapy [3].
Epiglottic collapse is now more actively sought for and the nding is more com­mon than previously thought with the prevalence range of 12.5% to just above 70% [4, 5]. Epiglottic surgery is surrounded by fear of potential complications that could result, namely that of excessive bleeding into the airway and of course the risk of swallowing difculty and/or aspiration. With regard to swallowing, there are reports to conrm that process of swallowing is not signicantly affected [6, 7]. Advance in technology has aided in performing the procedure in a safer manner and these include surgical tools such as coblation, laser and the trans-oral robotic approach [7].
Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34992-8_19. The videos can be accessed individually by click-
ing the DOI link in the accompanying gure caption or by scanning this link with the SN More Media App.
B. T. Kotecha (*) Nufeld Health Brentwood, Essex, UK
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 M. Delakorda, N. de Vries (eds.), The Role of Epiglottis in Obstructive Sleep Apnea, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34992-8_19
257