Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_35_библиотеки_им_акад_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
02.09.2026
Размер:
19 Мб
Скачать
19 Commonly Prescribed Medications that Aect Clotting: AComprehensive Overview
https://t.me/medicina_free
175
prosthetic heart valve, stroke, deep venous thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), or antiphospholipid syndrome.
Warfarin exists as two optically active isomers, R and S, which are highly protein-bound (99%). Oral bioavailability is around 90%. Warfarin is metabolized by oxidative metab­olism in the liver, which involves several cytochrome P450 isoenzymes; the elimination of warfarin is almost entirely by hepatic microsomal enzyme metabolism. S-Warfarin is ve times more potent than R warfarin and is metabolized pri­marily by CYP2C9, while R- warfarin is metabolized pri­marily by CYP2C19, CYP1A2, and CYP3A4. Certain individuals carry allele variations of CYP2C9, which reduces the rate of warfarin metabolism. These variations are esti­mated to occur in up to 11% of the Caucasian population. Warfarin half-life ranges from 25 to 60h (mean – 40h), and duration of effect can be 2–5days [76].
Warfarin has a narrow therapeutic index and variable dose requirements. This combination of variable dose require­ments, and variable rates of metabolism and clearance makes it difcult to maintain patients within a dened range of anti­coagulation. Maintaining the patient in the ideal INR target range of greater than 2 but less than 3 is challenging; an INR of less than 2 increases the risk of thrombotic events, while INR greater than 3 increases the risk of bleeding [39]. These bleeding events can range from ecchymosis, occult bleeding, or hemorrhage and from upper or lower gastrointestinal tract, microscopic or macroscopic hematuria, epistaxis, or intra­cranial hemorrhage. The use of warfarin has the highest fatal intracranial bleeding risk when the risk is compared to the newer DOAC medications [42]. Additionally, warfarin administration carries associated risks of teratogenicity, cho­lesterol embolization, vascular calcication, nephropathy, and skin necrosis in patients with protein C deciency. On the other side of the spectrum, subtherapeutic INR can result in life-threatening thromboembolic events.
Similar to concerns with the use of other anticoagulant agents, contraindications to use of warfarin include active bleeding, severe thrombocytopenia (dened as platelet count <50,000/L), signicant trauma, invasive procedures, obstet­ric delivery, history of intracranial hemorrhage, intracranial or spinal tumor, administration of neuraxial anesthesia, and severe, uncontrolled hypertension. Other contraindications that are more specic to warfarin include thyroid disease and renal insufciency [39]. Patients who are beginning warfarin therapy; usually start with 5 mg daily on days 1 and 2 of therapy; then on day 3, the dose is usually adjusted based on results of PT/INR.Patients who are elderly, frail, malnour­ished, or with preexisting liver, heart, or kidney disease usu­ally use 2.5mg daily or 2.5mg alternating with 5mg daily [59]. Several factors affect the warfarin dose, including age,
body mass index, gender, race, concomitant drug use, co­morbidities, and genetic variables that affect warfarin phar­macokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Saleh et al. have proposed application of articial neural network (ANN) to develop a warfarin dosing algorithm, and they were able to predict ideal warfarin dosage in 48% of patients [77].
Heparin
Unlike the other oral and IV anticoagulants discussed previ­ously, which do not depend on antithrombin activity to pro­vide anticoagulation effects, heparin is an antithrombin-dependent, indirect Factor Xa inhibitor [60]. Heparin may be administered via the subcutaneous or intra­venous route, but it is not administered via an oral route. Indications for the use of heparin include prophylaxis and treatment of thromboembolic disorders (VTE, PE) and thrombotic complications associated with atrial brillation, prevention of clotting during vascular and cardiac surgery, and as an anticoagulant for extracorporeal circulation and dialysis procedures. Contraindications of heparin include hypersensitivity to heparin, severe thrombocytopenia, his­tory of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), and uncontrolled active bleeding except when that bleeding is due to diffuse intravascular coagulation (DIC) [66]. Initiation of heparin anticoagulation often starts with an initial bolus of 80units/kg followed by 18units/kg/hr as a therapeutic dose or 5000 units subcutaneously 2 h preoperatively and then every 8–12h postoperatively as a prophylactic dose [78]. Side effects associated with heparin use include thrombocy­topenia, HIT, chest pain, shock, thrombosis, vasospasm, hemorrhage, and increased liver enzymes [66]. Unlike war­farin, heparin does not cross the placenta, so when antico­agulation is needed during pregnancy, it is considered to be a more useful anticoagulation medication and associated with a signicantly reduced risk. Heparin can be used for treat­ment of thromboembolic disease during pregnancy [65].
Warfarin, heparin, and the newer DOACs may be used to provide prophylaxis against and treatment of major thrombo­embolic complications that may arise in the peri-operative period. While these medications each have specic side effects, common to all anticoagulants is the risk of major bleeding. Since patients who are using any of these anticoagulation med­ications are often concurrently taking medications that can affect the metabolism of anticoagulants, they often have an increased risk of experiencing adverse events. Clinicians who prescribe these medications or administer them should be well­informed about the various drug-drug interactions that exist. Interactions that occur between anticoagulants and antidepres­sants, antiplatelets, antibiotics, NSAIDs, and herbal supple­ments are clearly documented [6063, 78].
176
https://t.me/medicina_free
A. Shelvan et al.
Drug-Drug Interactions: Drug Classes
Antidepressants and SSRIs
Warfarin is metabolized by the cytochrome P450 enzymes. One of these enzymes, cytochrome P450 2C9 (abbreviated as CYP2C9), demonstrates a major role in the oxidation of xenobiotic and endogenous compounds. This enzyme is inhibited by the antidepressants uoxetine and uvox­amine. Whenever a patient using one of these antidepres­sants also has warfarin administered, the warfarin is not metabolized as efciently. This leads to increased warfarin levels and enhanced warfarin effects. Other antidepres­sants, such as citalopram, nefazodone, and sertraline, have not demonstrated such associations with warfarin [69]. Similarly, a severely elevated INR was found with the con­comitant use of duloxetine and warfarin. This was hypoth­esized to be the result of metabolism by various cytochrome P450 enzymes or competitive binding of both substances at protein-binding sites [63].
Antiplatelet Drugs
Several studies have demonstrated that combining anti­platelet drugs and anticoagulants can lead to detrimental synergistic reactions that ultimately lead to increased bleeding. One such example is detailed in a paper by So and Eckman; they state, “multiple studies examining out­comes of combined antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy in patients with indications for both have demonstrated an increased risk of major hemorrhage compared with either treatment alone” [79]. Similarly, a meta-analysis of 25,307 patients demonstrated that the combination of antiplatelets and anticoagulants in individuals with ACS does not reduce major adverse cardiac events (MACE), such as all­cause death, nonfatal MI, and nonfatal thromboembolic stroke, but it does increase the risk of major bleeding. Due to the negative clinical outcomes associated with concomi­tant use of full-dose warfarin and aspirin, this combination is not preferred for long-term treatment of coronary artery disease or peripheral artery disease [63]. “Medications affecting platelet function have a synergistic pharmacody- namic interaction with warfarin; concomitant use, there­fore, can result in signicant increases in PT-INR and, in turn, in an increased risk of bleeding” [68]. A study done in 278,074 Australian veterans who had been using warfa­rin demonstrated that approximately 7.2% received co­administration of nonsteroidal anti-inammatory agents and 5.9% received antiplatelet medications such as NSAIDs. This study, however, did not assess harm associ­ated with these potentially hazardous interactions and noted that their study could not assess concomitant pur­chase of over-the-counter medications such as aspirin and some NSAIDs [80].
Antibiotics
Antibiotics, like antidepressants, are heavily metabolized by CYP450 enzymes, most notably CYP3A4, and have also been found to interact with permeability glycoproteins. Because many anticoagulants interact with both CYP3A4 and permeability glycoproteins, drug-drug interactions may arise and affect the metabolism of these drugs. Notably, the bioavailability of dabigatran is decreased with concurrent use of clarithromycin and rifampicin. Clarithromycin, eryth­romycin, uconazole, and ketoconazole affect the bioavail­ability of rivaroxaban. Because apixaban and edoxaban are newer drugs, less drug-drug interaction data is available [62]. As detailed in a table from Minno etal., plasma DOAC con­centrations can be increased with concurrent use of common antifungals and antibiotics due to inhibition of permeability glycoproteins (P-gp) and CYP450 enzymes [68]. Those that inhibit P-gp and CYP3A4 are the “-conazole” antibiotics: ketoconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole. those that inhibit P-gp and CYP450 are the “-mycin” antibi­otics: erythromycin, clarithromycin, and azithromycin.
NSAIDs
A synergistic effect, which led to increased bleeding, has been noted with the concomitant use of NSAIDs and warfa­rin. Other commonly used anti-inammatory drugs, such as acetaminophen, allopurinol, celecoxib, dextropropoxyphene, indomethacin, methyl-prednisolone, piroxicam, sulindac, and tramadol, were all found to increase PT/INR, while mesalazine and sulfasalazine lowered PT/INR [68]. Adverse drug-drug interactions have been noted to occur between NSAIDs and a variety of concomitantly administered medi­cations such as aspirin, alcohol, some antihypertensives, antidepressants, and other commonly used medications [81].
Herbal Supplements/Ginkgo
Like medications discussed previously, many herbal supple­ments have drug-drug interactions with anticoagulants and may, therefore, contribute to increased bleeding risks. Comparedto vitamin K antagonists, such as warfarin, DOAC effects have proven to be more stable and less inuenced by herbal supple­ments or differences in diet [68]. Additionally, the quantity of herbal supplements taken by patients already taking warfarin also inuences therisk of bleeding; Chan etal. found that “war­farin patients taking no herbal medications or only 1 herbal <4 times per week were more likely to have PT-INR values within the optimal therapeutic range of 2.0–3.0 compared to those tak­ing >1 type of herbal 4 times per week (58.1% vs 51.1%, P = 0.046)” [60]. Consumption of Ginkgo can also increase the risk of bleeding; in vitro studies have shown that avanol aglycones like amentoavone, which are components of Ginkgo, can inhibit CYP2C9 and thereby increase plasma concentrations of anticoagulants metabolized by this enzyme [68].
19 Commonly Prescribed Medications that Aect Clotting: AComprehensive Overview
https://t.me/medicina_free
177
Drug-Drug Interactions: Specic Drugs
Amiodarone
Since warfarin is used to prevent or reduce the risk of stroke in patients with atrial brillation, prosthetic valves, and patients with a history of thromboembolic disorders, both amiodarone and warfarin have been used concurrently. When concerns of ventricular or supraventricular arrhythmias exist, amiodarone (as a Vaughan-Williams class III antiarrhythmic agent with a long half-life) may be administered concur­rently with warfarin. It is essential to be aware of the result­ing interactions when a patient uses both of these medications. Amiodarone is metabolized by CYP3A4 and CYP2C8 to desethylamiodarone, and these hepatic enzymes are also involved to some extent in warfarin metabolism. Amiodarone decreases CYP2C9 1A2 and 3A4 enzymes and thereby inhibits warfarin hydroxylation [8284]. This reduces clear­ance of the more potent S- warfarin. In patients receiving the drug combination of amiodarone and warfarin, the antico­agulation effect is increased from this reduction in hepatic clearance whenever both drugs are administered. Anticoagulation is potentiated since the dose of warfarin required to achieve a therapeutic INR is reduced. Some stud­ies have also suggested altered protein binding as a contribu­tor to this effect.
Multiple factors affect these interactions, such as the patient’s specic genetics, and the presence of comorbidities from cardiac, hepatic, or renal systems, thyroid dysfunction, GI bleed, or cancer. The specic interactions affecting the rate of metabolism and clearance may also relate to specic other medications used. Theseinteractions are patient spe­cic and not clearly predictable. Advanced patient age may also reduce the clearance of both medications and increase the potential for adverse interactions.
Drug interaction between warfarin and amiodarone results in apotentiation of warfarin’s effect and prolonged INR due to prolonged half-life. In a Swedish retrospective study con­ducted by Holm etal., more than one in three patients receiv­ing both warfarin and amiodarone revealed supratherapeutic anticoagulative effect within 3weeks to an INR of around
3.07 [82].
There is an increased bleeding risk when a patient uses both amiodarone and warfarin. After initiation of amioda­rone, close monitoring of INR once every 3–4days to main­tain therapeutic level of anticoagulation, and timely dose adjustment, is vital to prevent life-threatening bleeding epi­sodes and thus hospitalizations. A study by Sanoski etal. to determine the dosage relationship in patients on long-term amiodarone indicates that the magnitude of interaction peaks at 7 weeks and is associated with a 44% mean maximum reduction in warfarin dose; the warfarin requirement gradu­ally increased thereafter. Additionally, they report that the
interaction is dependent on the maintenance dose of amioda­rone [83]. Lam et al., in a retrospective study on older patients found a greater risk of hemorrhage among patients who received amiodarone compared with patients receiving warfarin alone and encountered mortality of 12.5% follow­ing initiation of amiodarone [85].
When initiating amiodarone therapy, there are manyrec­ommendations. Holm etal. recommend an initial reduction of the mean dose of warfarin by 25% [82]. A study by Sanoski recommends reducing dose of warfarin by 40% when using 400 mg/d of amiodarone and additional 55% reduction in warfarin dose when amiodarone dose is tapered to achieve INR of 2–3 [83]. Family practice physicians were cautioned about the interaction between amiodarone and warfarin in 2002; a percentage reduction in the administered warfarin dose based on the administered amiodarone dose was recommended [86]. Carpenter et al. suggested an empiric warfarin dose reduction of 30–50% upon initiation of amiodarone and weekly INR monitoring [84].
Ciprooxacin (Cipro)
In a population-based study, Fischer etal. stated that con­comitant use of warfarin and ciprooxacin in older patients increased the risk of hospital admission with upper gastroin­testinal hemorrhage [87]. Lane and colleagues found that
42.6% of antimicrobial prescriptions among warfarin users were for medications (TMP/SMX, ciprooxacin, levooxa­cin, metronidazole and uconazole) that presented risk for excessive bleeding [88].
A study of all 66 cases reported to the FDA spontaneous reporting system (SRS) database from 1987 through 1997, including the two that occurred at his institution, Ellis etal. report that patients previously anticoagulated with warfarin, who have ciprooxacin administered, may develop an exag­gerated hypoprothrombinemic response and bleeding diathe­sis. In 50 of these patients, this coagulopathy was recognized within 5.5days following initial administration of ciproox­acin. The ciprooxacin–warfarin coagulopathy occurred most commonly in patients in their seventh decade of life and in those who required polypharmacy. Additionally, they reported a more rapid resolution of the coagulopathy when the patients received active treatment for the coagulopathy, rather than simply withholding the medications involved and keeping the patients under medical observation while the coagulopathy spontaneously resolved. This study by Ellis suggests that INR should be checked within 4–5days fol­lowing initiation of ciprooxacin, especially in older patients [89].
Clarithromycin (Biaxin)
Clarithromycin is a macrolide antibiotic. As described by Lane etal., this drug is a high-risk antibiotic that interacts
178
https://t.me/medicina_free
A. Shelvan et al.
with warfarin and increases the risk of serious bleeding that requires hospitalization [90]. Clarithromycin inhibits warfa­rin metabolism particularly via CYP3A and P-glycoprotein. It may also eliminate vitamin K-producing bacteria in the intestines to further alter the therapeutic effect of warfarin and prolong the international normalized ratio (INR). INR monitoring is essential within 3–14days of the prescription to reduce the risk of serious bleeding event. A case report published in Emergency Medicine Journal, 2006, reports a case of retroperitoneal hematoma in a 69-year-old woman who had been on chronic warfarin and was prescribed clar­ithromycin for lower respiratory infection [91].
Erythromycin, and Quinidine
Both erythromycin and quinidine are known to affect cyto­chromes P1A2 and P3A4. Al-Jundi and Rubin have described a rare presentation of spontaneous hemopericardiac tampon­ade in a patient on warfarin who was treated with erythromy­cin for a chest infection [92].
Rifampin (Rifadin, Rimactane)
Administration of rifampin is known to induce CYP2C9 and CYP3A4, and it therefore increases clearance of warfarin. This may result in a decrease of the INR, unless the dose of warfarin is concomitantly increased by 25–40% when ther­apy with rifampin is initiated. Poon etal. reported a warfarin­rifampin drug interaction in a 20-month-old- female where the warfarin management posed a challenge due to dramatic increase in warfarin dosing requirement [93].
Metronidazole (Flagyl)
Metronidazole decreases CYP2C9 activity and therefore interferes with metabolism of S-warfarin. This results in an increase in the INR when metronidazole is added to the med­ications a patient takes, when the patient is using warfarin. This increased INR is likely to be clinically important as the risk for intracranial hemorrhage doubles for each 1.0 increase in the INR.Even if intracranial hemorrhage does not occur, it appears that the risk for other minor bleeding complica­tions increases. It is recommended that the warfarin dose should be reduced by 25–40% when metronidazole (Flagyl) therapy is initiated [94]. A retrospective study by Holt etal., recommends 30–35% reduction in mean daily dose (a pre­emptive dose reduction) to maintain therapeutic anticoagula­tion while on metronidazole. However, while considering a preemptive dose reduction of warfarin, the risk of subthera­peutic INR and risk of thromboembolic events should be weighed against risk of bleeding. INR should be monitored no later than 72h after initiation of both medications in such instances where risk of thromboembolism is high [94].
Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole (Bactrim)
Bactrim is apotent antimicrobial thatinteracts with warfarin. Antimicrobials can inhibit CYP450 isozymes, alter protein
binding, and alter the gut ora, thereby reducing vitamin K absorption. Several studies illustrate that this drug signi­cantly and rapidly elevates INR in patients taking warfarin and signicantly increases risks of undesired bleeding, espe­cially in elderly patients. Concomitant use of warfarin and cotrimoxazole was discussed in the Annals of Internal Medicine in 2010. This article clearly states that few drug interactions are as well established as the interactions between these two medications. These interactions were felt to markedly increase risk of upper GI hemorrhage, which qualies as a “never event” by the National Quality Forum
95]. Bactrim decreases CYP2C9 activity; this is primarily
[ due to the sulfamethoxazole component, rather than from tri­methoprim. Concurrent use of warfarin and trimethoprim/ sulfamethoxazole is associated with two to vefold increase in bleeding risk [96]. When initiating bactrim therapy in a patient who is also using warfarin, the INR should be moni­tored within 3–4 days of starting the antimicrobial. When bactrim is initiated, the recommended dose reduction of war­farin is by 10–20% to avoid potentially dangerous increase in INR prior to the INR follow-up [ slower due to longer half-life of warfarin. It is equally impor­tant to adjust the warfarin dose once the antimicrobial is dis­continued to avoid subtherapeutic INR. Fischer et al. recommend that in older patients receiving warfarin, it is bet­ter to prescribe alternative antibiotics as patients are at high risk for upper GI hemorrhage when cotrimoxazole is admin­istered along with warfarin [87].
97]. Dose titration should be
Fluvastatin (Lescol)
HMG-CoA (3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A) reductase inhibitors are effective in both primary and sec­ondary prevention of ischemic heart disease. Since they are usually prescribed in older patients for a prolonged duration, the drug interactions must always be borne in mind. Fluvastatin is a synthetic HMG Co-A reductase inhibitor and a lipid-regulating drug. Patients with cardiovascular disease are often prescribed warfarin and statins concurrently. In an investigation of the interaction between the two, it was found that uvastatin signicantly displaced the plasma protein binding of warfarin [98]. Fluvastatin inhibits CYP2C9 and the formation of 7-hydroxy warfarin. This increased warfarin concentrations and increased bleeding risk. Other “statin” medications, lovastatin, rosuvastatin, and simvastatin, exert a similar effect. Although the combination therapy of a “statin” and warfarin is frequently considered useful, the INR should be closely monitored after initiation therapy or a change in the dose of the medication.
Atorvastatin (Lipitor)
Another HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor is often prescribed for both primary and secondary prevention of ischemic heart disease. Since this class of medications is usually prescribed in older patients for a prolonged duration, the drug interac-
19 Commonly Prescribed Medications that Aect Clotting: AComprehensive Overview
https://t.me/medicina_free
179
tions must always be borne in mind. In addition to the inter­actions already noted that occur with this class of medications, atorvastatin inhibits CYP3A4 isozymes, which metabolizes the less active R isomer and creates the same concerns noted previously with use of itraconazole (Sporanox). An observa­tional study by Schelleman etal. reported that initiation of statins in chronic warfarin users increases the potential risk of gastrointestinal bleeding, especially during the rst anti­hyperlipidemic prescription [99]. A case report in the British Journal of Hospital Medicine describes the rare event of acute rhabdomyolysis following initiation of warfarin in a patient on stable atorvastatin therapy [100]. The mechanism of this appears to be that warfarin administration increased the bioavailability of the statin, resulting in acute rhabdomy­olysis. Close monitoring of INR, serum creatine kinase lev­els, and constant vigilance is required when these drugs are co-prescribed as there is potential for increased bioavailabil­ity of either drug.
Carbamazepine (Tegretol)
Carbamazepine is an antiseizure medication of the iminostil­bene class, indicated for use in the management of temporal lobe epilepsy/complex partial seizures. Additionally, carba­mazepine has been used as a rst-line medication for trigem­inal neuralgia. It enhances warfarin metabolism by induction of the cytochrome P450 group, primarily CYP2C9 and CYP3A4. A Swedish retrospective study reports that patients on warfarin who were co-administered carbamazepine expe­rienced a subtherapeutic anticoagulation effect within 3–5 weeks. The average warfarin dose was subsequently increased by 49.2% (95% CI 42.8–55.9) to maintain the desired level of anticoagulation [101]. Clarke et al. also found that warfarin dose requirement increased by 32% after carbamazepine initiation. The onset of interaction with war­farin was chronic and with a variable onset ranging from 16 to 30days in this study. Therefore, the authors did not make a recommendation for a predicted preemptive dose adjust­ment [102].
Close INR monitoring is essential when carbamazepine is initiated or withdrawn during warfarin therapy, to meet the anticipated change in dose demand and to prevent ischemic stroke and thrombosis.
Fluvoxamine (Luvox)
Concomitant use of uvoxamine or other selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and warfarin is very common, as cardiovascular disease and depression often coexist. In the­ory, SSRIs could inhibit platelet aggregation by preventing platelet reuptake of serotonin. Fluvoxamine maleate has the potential to inhibit multiple cytochromes (CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, and CYP3A4) to a signicant degree. It is a potent CYP2C9 inhibitor with a half-life of 17–22h after a single dose. This is an important consideration because CYP2C9 is the main metabolizing enzyme of the
more active (S)- enantiomer of coumadin. This would appear to increase the risk of excessive anticoagulant effect of war­farin when these medications are co-administered.
A multi-database cohort study by Dong et al. followed 52,129 patients for up to 180days and analyzed the bleeding and thromboembolic events and mortality in patients exposed to SSRIs and warfarin. They concluded that patients con­comitantly treated with warfarin and SSRIs that are potent CYP2C9 inhibitors had comparable rates of bleeding events, ischemic or thrombotic events, and mortality. This study sug­gests that SSRI inhibition of CYP2C9 does not appear to affect major safety or effectiveness outcomes of warfarin treatment in clinical practice, where patients may be closely monitored [ pharmacokinetic interaction than expected, and hence mini­mal effects on clinical outcome, could be upregulation of other enzymes that metabolize warfarin.
In contrast to the Dong study however, a few years prior to its publication, Quinn etal. reported that SSRI exposure was associated with major hemorrhage risk in patients taking warfarin [ described an increased risk of intracerebral and intracranial hemorrhage with concomitant use of SSRI and oral antico­agulants when compared to patients with oral anticoagulants alone [105]. It would certainly appear that caution is advised when managing patients using both SSRI medications and warfarin, even though there may be no clear “cause and effect” relationship.
103]. A possible explanation for less impact on
104]. Almost 2years earlier Hackam et al. also
Fluoxetine (Prozac)
Fluoxetine is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, which ranks 14th on the list of medications used concomitantly with warfarin [76]. Fluoxetine hydrochloride is a potent CYP2C9 inhibitor and inhibits oxidative metabolism of S-warfarin. This drug has high afnity for plasma albumin. SSRIs might hinder platelet aggregation by depletion of platelet serotonin levels and could result in an increased ther­apeutic response and an increase in INR. Recognizing the narrow therapeutic index of warfarin, and the potential for multiple medications used in psychiatry to interfere with it, an analysis of data published in 2009 recommended that while uvoxamine and uoxetine pose the highest potential risks, sertraline and citalopram appear to be the safest antide­pressant medications to use in patients who concomitantly use warfarin [106].
Itraconazole (Sporanox)
Itraconazole is a broad-spectrum triazole antifungal agent for prophylaxis and treatment of aspergillosis, endemic mycoses, onychomycosis, and vaginal candidiasis. It inhibits CYP3A4, which metabolizes R (+) warfarin (the less biologically active enantiomer of warfarin) and P-glycoprotein, and therefore, interactions are less severe than other azole antifungals [107]. It is recommended to
180
https://t.me/medicina_free
A. Shelvan et al.
monitor for increased anticoagulant effects (e.g., INR, bleeding) if itraconazole is initiated/dose increased, and decreased effects if itraconazole is discontinued/dose decreased [107].
Fluconazole (Diucan)
Fluconazole inhibits the metabolism of S-warfarin via CYP2C9 and 8-hydroxylation of R-warfarin through CYP2C19 [108]. UpToDate recommends empiric reduction in warfarin dose of 10–20% along with INR monitoring for dosing titrations [109].
Miconazole (Monistat)
Miconazole is a broad-spectrum antifungal agent and is the strongest inhibitor of CYP2C9 and CYP2C19, followed by voriconazole and uconazole. Due to the strong inhibition of CYP2C9 and therefore, inhibition of the conversion of (S) warfarin to (S) 7-hydroxywarfarin, PT-INR increases [108]. Elderly patients on warfarin usually have comorbidities and increased risk of oral candidiasis. Systemic absorption after topical administration decreases total body clearance of both (R) and (S) warfarin. A study reports the pro-hemorrhagic effects of ecchymosis, subcutaneous hematomas, and hema­turia aftertwoweeks of concomitant use with warfarin [68]. Another case report describes intestinal intramural hema­toma presenting as acute abdomen after initiation of topical miconazole for vaginal candidiasis [110]. In patients using warfarin, nystatin appears to be a safer choice for oral candi­diasis treatment [111].
Voriconazole (Vfend)
Voriconazole is a triazole with broad-spectrum antifungal activity. It is metabolized by CYP450 enzymes, primarily by CYP2C19, CYP2C9, and CYP3A4 [108]. It is also a strong inhibitor of CYP3A4. The (S) form is the more pharmaco­logically active isomer. Since the CYP2C9 pathway is involved in its metabolism, the interactions with anticoagula­tion medications are clinically signicant. This involvement results in a prolongation of the prothrombin time. Purkins etal. performed a double-blind randomized controlled study and noted that voriconazole potentiates warfarin-induced pro­thrombin time prolongation. Without a reduction in warfarin dose, the peak anticoagulation effect at 40–50h following a voriconazole dose appears to be approximately 50% greater. This enhanced anticoagulation effect can still be seen even at 144 h following co-administration with voriconazole. They recommended regular monitoring of the prothrombin time if voriconazole and warfarin are co-administered [112].
of anaphylaxis (SRSA). Cysteinyl leukotriene production and receptor occupation have been correlated with the patho­physiology of asthma, including airway edema, smooth mus­cle constriction, and altered cellular activity associated with the inammatory process, which contribute to the signs and symptoms of asthma. In vitro studies demonstrated that Zarlukast antagonized the contractile activity of three leu­kotrienes (LTC
, LTD4,, and LTE4) in conducting airway
4
smooth muscle from laboratory animals and humans. It also prevented intradermal LTD4-induced increases in cutaneous vascular permeability and inhibited inhaled LTD4-induced inux of eosinophils into animal lungs. In humans, zarlu­kast inhibited bronchoconstriction caused by several kinds of inhalational challenges. The bronchodilation, anti­inammatory properties, and steroid-sparing effects provide signicant benets to patients with allergic and exercise­induced asthma. Pretreatment with single oral doses of zar­lukast inhibited the bronchoconstriction caused by sulfur dioxide and cold air in patients with asthma. It usually takes weeks before maximal benet is seen when this class of medication is administered. As such, these medications are primarily used for prophylaxis and treatment of allergic and exercise-induced asthma. Zarlukast exhibits a peak plasma concentration within 3h after oral administration and exhib­its a plasma protein binding of >99% to albumin. Its mean terminal elimination half-life is ~10h. It is cleared by hepatic metabolism involving hydroxylation by the CYP450 system, primarily utilizing CYP2C9. In vivo studies have demon­strated that zarlukast inhibits CYP3A4 and CYP2C9 isoen­zymes [113]. In patients with signicant hepatic impairment (e.g., biopsy proven cirrhosis), there is a reduced clearance resulting in 50–60% greater maximum concentration and a prolonged area under the curve in clearance studies, when compared to normal subjects [114]. If co-administered to a patient on warfarin therapy, Zarlukast impairs the normal clearance of warfarin, and enhanced antithrombotic effects result. This is demonstrated by an increase in PT and INR values demonstrated on coagulation studies.
Cimetidine (Tagamet)
Use of cimetidine does not appear to be of signicant con­cern to patients taking warfarin. The cytochrome isoenzymes involved in cimetidine metabolism, CYP1A2 and CYP3A4, are primarily involved in the metabolism of the less potent R-warfarin isomer. Interactions and inhibition of metabolism are usually of less magnitude than when co- administered medications affect the CYP2C9 isoenzyme.
Zarlukast (Accolate)
Zarlukast is a selective peptide leukotriene receptor antago­nist of three leukotriene C4, D4, and E4 (LTC4, LTD4 and LTE4), which are components of the slow-reacting substance
Patients withHIV Infections
Patients who suffer from HIV are prone to venous thrombo­sis. Antiretroviral drug interactions are mediated through the
19 Commonly Prescribed Medications that Aect Clotting: AComprehensive Overview
https://t.me/medicina_free
181
cytochrome P450 pathway and through P-glycoproteins to a lesser extent. Anti-HIV medications are protease inhibitors and therefore demonstrate inhibition of the cytochrome P450 system; they also tend to induce CYP2C9. This tends to enhance themetabolism of warfarin. The extent of this effect and the specic CYP450 isoenzymes involved vary from one anti-HIV medication to another. The INR response from the administration of any of these medications should be monitored when a patient is also using any anti-HIV medica­tions concurrent with theuse of anticoagulation medications.
Indinavir (Crixivan)
Indinavir is a protease inhibitor and an inhibitor of CYP3A4. Even though indinavir demonstrates mild to moderate hepatic impairment, there is less concern about excessive inhibition of warfarin metabolism when indinavir is co­administered, because the CYP2C9 isoenzyme is not involved.
Ritonavir (Norvir)
Liedtke and Rathbun found that intermittent ritonavir use may result in inhibition of CYP2C9 and CYP3A4, rather than induction [115].
their high protein binding and their cytochrome P450 depen­dent clearance mechanism. Additionally, they also have anti­platelet effects. NSAIDs may cause gastric ulcers by erosion of the stomach lining and increase the risk of signicant gas­trointestinal bleeding when the anticoagulant effect of warfa­rin is superimposed. Yildirim et al. have described a rare complication in an 80-year-old female on stable chronic war­farin therapy for the previoustenyears and who was tested regularly for anticoagulation status. Her last INR values prior to this emergency presentation had been 2.1. Following use of a non-steroidal anti-inammatory medication for arthritis painthreedays earlier, she presented to the emer­gency department with complaints of the sudden onset of severe abdominal pain but had not noted melena or hemato­chezia. CT evaluation demonstrated ndings of distal jeju­num and proximal ileal transmural thickening along with extensive free peritoneal uid. During her observation in the emergency department, her hemoglobin level dropped to 3g/ dL and she developed hemorrhagic shock, despite no clear evidence of external bleeding or intraluminal intestinal bleeding. On admission, she had a prothrombin time of
68.9s and INR of 12. She was given fresh frozen plasma, vitamin K supplements, and red blood cells to normalize INR and hemoglobin level [118].
Prednisone (Deltasone, Sterapred, Preds, Etc.)
Prednisone is a frequently used anti-inammatory agent. Prednisone and warfarin have been used together in idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome (IHES), a rare disease associated with cardiac thrombosis and endocardial wall thickness. They are also prescribed together in the management of peripheral vascular disease associated with autoimmune disease, sys­temic lupus erythematosus (SLE), multiple myeloma, Behcet’s disease, etc. Case reports indicate an increased INR response afterthe addition of prednisone to warfarin [116].
A randomized controlled trial by Dowd etal. compared a 10–20% preemptive dose reduction vs. a reactive adjustment and found that the preemptive warfarin dose reduction resulted in a nonsignicant reduction in supratherapeutic INR but, con­trary to expectations, increased the chances of subtherapeutic INR [117]. These studies demonstrate that an increase in INR within 3–10 days after corticosteroid initiation may be expected. Timely INR monitoring is essential when these two medications are co-prescribed. A therapeutic dose adjustment may be expected but should be based on INR response.
Nonsteroidal Anti-inammatory Drugs (NSAIDs)
NSAIDs are commonly used to control musculoskeletal pain. NSAIDs are known to interact with warfarin due to
Chronic Ethanol Use or Abuse
Chronic ethanol ingestion increased warfarin clearance via induction of CYP2E1, while acute ethanol use inhibits war­farin metabolism.
Vitamin K
Many foods contain signicant amounts of vitamin K. The average person in the United States takes in 60–80 micro­grams (mcg) of vitamin K per day. Dietary vitamin K can alter the effectiveness of warfarin. Consistency in dietary intake of food containing high amounts of potassium is also important for patients on warfarin. Dietary supplements that contain vitamin K or metabolites related to vitamin K-coenzyme Q10 have the potential to reduce the effects of warfarin. Other dietary constituents which may affect a patient’s coagulation status, especially when using anti­coagulation medications, include weight-loss diets (rich in green vegetables), multivitamins/dietary supplements, broc­coli, brussels sprouts, cabbage, collard greens, endive, kale, lettuce, mustard greens, parsley, spinach, swiss chard, turnip greens, watercress, lentils, garbanzo beans, soybeans, soy­bean, canola oil, olive oil, liver (from beef, pork, or chicken), avocados, dried basil, thyme, oregano, dill pickle, green peas, foods packed in oil, snack foods fortied with vitamin
182
https://t.me/medicina_free
A. Shelvan et al.
K, grapefruit, grapefruit juice (the component furanocouma­rin in grapefruit and grapefruit juice decreases warfarin metabolism by inhibiting CYP3A4), store-bought marga­rine, store-bought mayonnaise, and store-bought salad dress­ings (due to vegetable oil content).
St. John’s Wort (Hypericum perforatum)
Herbal supplements, which are not FDA-approved medica­tions can often be overlooked. It is not always easy to elicit the history of ingestion of herbal supplements from the patients, as they might mistakenly think that they are herbs and hence innocuous. Herbs have the potential to cause adverse effects when used concomitantly with medications as they contain bioactive compounds. Patients should be educated regarding the possible interactions, risks, and con­sequences with drugs and supplements. St. John’s Wort is notably used for depression, sleep disorders, anxiety, and pain. It is documented to interact with 147 medications [119]. Its decreases theplasma concentration of warfarin by inducing CYP2C9 and CYP3A4 [120, 121]. This increases the clearance of both R and S enantiomers of warfarin. Thus, concurrent use of St John’s Wort reduces the efcacy of war­farin, putting the patient at a greater risk for a decrease in the INR and the development of a thrombotic event.
In summary, many drug-drug interactions between anti­coagulants and other medications exist, and careful consider­ation of these interactions is recommended during the peri-operative period. If physicians are not diligent about attention to detail, serious, avoidable complications related to excessive or inadequate anticoagulation may arise.
When considering them as a group, anticoagulants are an exceptional class of medications that help to provide life­saving prophylaxis and treatment for thromboembolic events. Many individuals are prescribed anticoagulation for the remaining duration of life. Without these medications, complications such as blood clots, DVTs, PEs, and strokes would be much more common and would have much higher mortality rates. Anticoagulants are effective, cost-efcient, and used all over the world. However, risks of side effects and other adverse effects are associated with the use of medi­cations, which provide anticoagulation effects. Many drug­drug interactions exist, which may adversely impact the safe and effective use of these medications. Due to the often fast­paced and trauma-associated nature of their specialties, anes­thesiologists and physicians working in Emergency Rooms should be well-informed about potential risks associated with the various medications, which have anticoagulation properties. When using anticoagulation medications, patients should keep readily found information with them (e.g., Medic-Alert bracelets or other identication cards), which
will quickly alert medical personnel to use of these agents. Proper management by medical personnel can be achieved only when they readily know, which anticoagulant medica­tion, or combination of anticoagulation medications, is being used.
Antibrinolytics
Under normal physiologic conditions, both the coagulation and brinolytic systems are intimately related allowingfor balanced hemostasis. Fibrinolysis is a tightly controlled enzymatic process that is responsible for blood clot regula­tion and breakdown. These processes are regulated by a vast array of receptors, inhibitors, and cofactors [122]. Fibrin is a central component and serves asthe main conduit for both thrombus breakdown and formation. Plasminogen is con­verted to plasmin via two primary serine proteases, tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), and urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA). Plasmin acts as the primary brinolysin for thrombus breakdown. tPA is synthesized and released by endothelial cells and is found intravascularly [122, 123]. When compared to tPA, uPA has a lower afnity to plas­minogen, is primarily extravascular, and is located in the uri­nary epithelium, macrophages, and monocytes [122]. In vivo, both have very short half-lives of 4–8 min and are hepatically cleared. This brief half-life is attributable to the high concentrations of circulating serine protease inhibiting factors like plasminogen activator-inhibitor-1(PAI-1). Serine protease inhibitors play a pivotal role to inhibit excess and unregulated plasmin activity. Our understanding and appre­ciation of brinolysis has been greatly improved with the advent of rotational thromboelastography (ROTEM). ROTEM allows for a visual representation of brinolysis and can indicate normal, hyper, or hypoactive brin breakdown. A detailed description of the many components of the bri­nolytic pathway is beyond the scope of this paper. A review of the most common antibrinolytics is below.
Antibrinolytics act by inhibiting the brinolytic cas­cade and preventing the breakdown of blood clots. Their use has been broadly studied for control of hemorrhage in trauma, cardiac surgery, traumatic brain injury, and numer­ous other clinical situations. Examples of antibrinolytics include aprotinin, tranexamic acid (TXA), and epsilon-ami­nocaproic acid. Aprotinin is a serine protease inhibitor that is no longer used in clinical practice. Results from the blood conservation using antibrinolytics in a randomized trial (BART) found an increased risk of 30-day mortality after use in cardiac surgery [123, 124]. Subsequent studies have also shown that patients given aprotinin have an increased risk of kidney failure, stroke, heart failure, and 5-year mor­tality [123125]. As a result of these ndings, clinical focus
19 Commonly Prescribed Medications that Aect Clotting: AComprehensive Overview
https://t.me/medicina_free
183
has shifted to the lysine analogs, TXA, and epsilon-amino­caproic acid.
Both tranexamic acid (TXA) and epsilon-aminocaproic acid are synthetic lysine analogs that work by competitively inhibiting the activation of plasminogen to plasmin [125]. The inhibition of plasminogen maintains brin integrity and prevents clot degradation. TXA is 6–10 times more potent than its counterpart epsilon-aminocaproic acid [126]. Unlike aprotinin, both lysine analogs have been shown to increase thrombus formation by increasing ADP content in platelets without resulting in increased thromboembolic events like a pulmonary embolus [126]. TXA has also been found to have anti-inammatory properties by mitigating cytokine release. A randomized controlled trial consisting of 50 patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) found that patients who received TXA had a signicantly lower levels of inammatory markers compared to those that received placebo [127]. Decreased levels of inammatory cytokines translate to less severe vasoplegic shock, less time requiring vasopressor support, and decreased time for mechanical respiratory support in the postoperative period [127]. In patients undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB, either TXA or epsilon-aminocaproic acid is routinely given to reduce perioperative bleeding and also subsequently decrease trans­fusion of blood products.
Lysine analogs have also shown signicant benets in noncardiac surgery. A recent meta-analysis included over 10,000 patients and found that those who received TXA had a 38% reduction in probability to require a blood transfusion compared to those patients who did not receive TXA [128]. The landmark CRASH-2 study looked at TXA administra­tion in over 20,000 hemorrhagic trauma patients [129]. Patients who received TXA upon initial presentation were found to have a signicant reduction in all-cause mortality and death due to bleeding compared to those that did not get TXA [128]. Even more recently, the CRASH-3 trial looked at TXA administration within 3h in patients with traumatic brain injury [130]. Findings were signicant for a reduction in injury-related death in those that received TXA compared to those that did not [130]. Both TXA and epsilon­aminocaproic acid have also been found to be benecial for reducing blood loss in orthopedic surgery, facilitating con­trol of gastrointestinal hemorrhage and pulmonary hemor­rhage [126].
TXA and epsilon-aminocaproic acid have a half-life of 2–3h and are primarily cleared renally. Clinicians need to be cognizant of potential adverse effects associated with lysine analogs. High-dose TXA is associated with a dose­dependent increase in seizures [131]. Epsilon-aminocaproic acid may also have an increased risk of renal dysfunction; however, more research needs to be done for conrmation.
Antiplatelets
Antiplatelet drugs work by inhibiting the capacity of plate­lets to participate in the clotting process. There are several discrete mechanisms by which platelets activate and aggre­gate. Thus, there are several pharmacologic targets. A grow­ing area of concern and research are the various interactions antiplatelet drugs can participate in with other drugs and commonly consumed substances.
When vessel endothelium is damaged, platelets are exposed to subendothelial matrix, which triggers multiple intracellular signaling pathways that lead to glycoprotein IIb/IIIa complexes on platelets activating and binding to brinogen, which results in platelet aggregation. One of these intracellular pathways is activated by thromboxane A2, which is produced by activated of cyclooxygenase-1 [132]. The antiplatelet action of aspirin is primarily mediated through its inhibition of COX-1 and consequently its inhibi­tion of the thromboxane A2 pathway to platelet activation. Aspirin is unique among the NSAIDs in that it irreversibly inhibits COX by acetylating serine residues. It is readily absorbed in the acidic gastric environment where it can inhibit the protective effects of prostaglandins on the stom­ach lining [133]. Thromboxane A2 inhibition within platelets is cumulative with repeated low doses of aspirin due to the irreversible enzyme inactivation via acetylation throughout the 7–10-day lifetime of platelets. This allows for aspirin to be given once daily and be effective despite its very short half-life (15–20min) [132]. For patients with ACS, a recom­mended 150–325 mg of oral aspirin is chewed to achieve rapid inhibition of thromboxane A2 [134]. Frequently aspirin is used for treatment and prophylaxis of pathologic thrombus formation. 100mg/day is sufcient for prevention of throm­bus formation in the coronary circulation; higher doses may be required for the prevention of vascular events in the cere­bral and peripheral circulation [13].
Aspirin has numerous interactions with various drugs. While non-aspirin NSAIDs also inhibit COX, they are not useful for platelet inhibition due to their reversible mode of action, which does not ensure permanent platelet inhibition. Most NSAIDs including, celecoxib, dipyrone (active metab­olite), ibuprofen, ufenamic acid, naproxen, nimesulide, oxaprozin, and piroxicam signicantly interfere with the antiplatelet activity of aspirin. Diclofenac, ketorolac, and acetaminophen do not interfere with aspirin. This is thought to be due to interfering with NSAIDs forming hydrogen bonds with the aspirin binding site [135]. There is also evi­dence that co-administration can lead to anincreased risk of myocardial infarction [81]. Alcohol consumption with aspi­rin is associated with anincreased risk of GI bleeding [136], and smoking cigarettes increases platelet aggregation and suppressing the effect of aspirin [137]. When administered
184
https://t.me/medicina_free
A. Shelvan et al.
with tamoxifen, aspirin decreases the angiogenic potential of some breast cancers [138]. There is evidence which shows that aspirin can blunt the effect with ACE-inhibitors, but paradoxically, there is evidence of reduced mortality with co-administration [139]. Triple therapy with ACE­inhibitors, diuretics, and NSAIDs, including aspirin, has been associated with anincreased risk of acute kidney injury [140]. Serotonergic agents, such as selective serotonin reup­take inhibitors, can increase risk of bleeding when com­bined with any oral anticoagulant, including antiplatelets and aspirin [141].
P2Y12 is an adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor that, once activated, propagates intracellular signals that increase intracellular calcium, alter platelet shape, and increase plate­let aggregation [142]. P2Y12 antagonists block these recep­tors. The use of aspirin and a P2Y12 receptor antagonist, known as dual antiplatelet therapy, is the basis of treatment in patients with ACS and those undergoing coronary stenting [132]. Clopidogrel and prasugrel are both prodrugs that need biotransformation in the liver to become active [143]. These two drugs irreversibly inhibit the P2Y12 receptor. Steady­state inhibition of platelet function is noted after 5–7days of clopidogrel maintenance dosing, accounting for the role of a loading dose to achieve more rapid inhibition. For clopido­grel, the recommended loading dose is 600 mg, and mainte­nance dose is 75mg [132].
Clopidogrel is the most popular P2Y12 inhibitor and has numerous interactions with other substances. Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs), such as omeprazole and esomeprazole (both substrates and inhibitors of CYP2C19), are associated with decreased inhibition of platelet aggregation by clopido­grel [144, 145]. However, more research remains on whether this affects clinical outcomes. Unlike aspirin, nicotine was found to increase the antiplatelet activity of clopidogrel [146], while grapefruit juice and ketoconazole decrease anti­platelet activity [147] due to the induction and inhibition of liver cytochrome enzymes respectively. Clopidogrel, aspirin, and warfarin have increased risk of GI bleeding when taken in combination than when any is taken alone [148].
Ticagrelor, another P2Y12 inhibitor, acts by reversibly binding P2Y12 away from the active site [132]. Ticagrelor is not a prodrug, and the recommended loading and mainte­nance doses are 180mg once and 90mg twice per day [132]. Ticagrelor is more effective than clopidogrel in preventing major cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndromes, but is associated with increased bleeding events, ventricular pauses, and dyspnea [142]. Some research has shown evidence that administration of high doses of aspirin can blunt ticagrelor’s effects [142, 149]. Ticagrelor is an inhibitor of CYP3A4 and consequently can increase plasma concentrations of simvastatin and lovastatin. This could potentially catalyze rhabdomyolysis and myopathy in vul­nerable patients [150]. Statins and ticagrelor are commonly
co-administered for long-term maintenance of ACS patients, and more research needs to be conducted to stratify risk and monitor long-term patient outcomes.
The intracellular signals generated by the stimulation of
platelet receptors results in conformational change of the major platelet adhesion receptor, GPIIb/IIIa (integrin-α
IIbβ3
) [151]. GPIIb/IIIa exists in a low-afnity conformation on the resting platelet, which can bind immobilized, but not solu­ble, brinogen. When platelets are activated, signals are propagated from within the platelet, which leads to a change in the conformation of GPIIb/IIIa from a low-afnity to a high-afnity state that enables binding to soluble plasma proteins. These protein ligands include vWF, bronectin, and the primary GPIIb/IIIa ligand brinogen [151, 152]. Thus, this integrin receptor is the crux of stable platelet aggregation and thrombus formation, making it an excellent target for pharmacotherapy.
GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors prevent brinogen from binding to activated platelets, thus directly inhibiting their aggregation. Three agents are currently in use: abciximab, a humanized antigen-binding fragment of a mouse monoclonal antibody; eptibatide, a cyclic heptapeptide with a motif mimicking the brinogen binding sequence within GPIIb/IIIa; and tiro­ban, a nonpeptidic small molecule also mimicking the brinogen binding site [153]. However, except in high-risk patients, the clinical use of integrin αIIbβ3 antagonists has recently decreased due to the increased use of ADP receptor antagonists. This replacement stems from the demonstrated benet of ADP receptor antagonists [154]. Therefore, the clinical benet derived from GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors seems to be restricted to particular high-risk subgroups, such as patients with MI undergoing PCI without pretreatment with a P2Y12 antagonist [152]. GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors are potent antithrombotic drugs and can cause bleeding complications in up to 50% of patients [155].
There are other less well-known and less studied drugs that affect platelet function. Cilostazol inhibits phosphodies­terase III and increases levels of cyclic AMP, which leads to vasodilation, reduction of vascular smooth muscle prolifera­tion, and inhibition of platelet aggregation. Cilostazol is sug­gested for symptomatic management of peripheral vascular disease and has been used after percutaneous coronary inter­vention and for secondary prevention of non-cardioembolic stroke or TIA.Its effects are strongly potentiated by ketocon­azole and likely by other CYP3A4 inhibitors such as itracon­azole, uconazole, miconazole, uvoxamine, uoxetine, nefazodone, sertraline, and macrolides [156]. There is evi­dence that it is moderately inhibited by lovastatin [156].
Dipyridamole blocks the uptake of adenosine, which acts on the platelet A
-receptor to activate platelet adenylate
2
cyclase, reducing platelet aggregation. Dipyridamole also inhibits phosphodiesterase. This drug is used for prevention of postoperative thromboembolic complications associated