Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_35_библиотеки_им_акад_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
02.09.2026
Размер:
19 Мб
Скачать
164
https://t.me/medicina_free
C. L. Riley and J. Dean
supply chain operations. Operations research is a research area that offers opportunity to model various scenarios including blood product demand changes, transportation interruption, and supply effects of restriction transfusion. Stressors that may challenge the supply chain should be understood, and therefore after-event analysis and periodic MCE exercises should be included in any plan. Low delity tabletop exercises can expose areas of weakness in preparedness and should involve representative health-care workers across the contin­uum of care. Gaps in current capabilities of the system should be identied, and mitigation approaches should be considered. Delay of blood arrival to the operating room (OR) may be related to supply, communication between the OR and transfu­sion services, or deciencies in transportation between sites, but the gap will persist without evaluation. Evolving technolo­gies and alternative transfusion practices should be evaluated for applicability to improve resiliency. Finally, one technology or mitigation approach may not be adequate to cover gaps in supply, but combined mitigation approaches may cover those gaps. Use of tranexamic acid, pre-thawed plasma, and SWB earlier may reduce the overall number of blood component products needed and reduce the strain on supply.
Anesthesiologists are well qualied to participate and lead emergency planning in their hospitals. Their expertise in resuscitation practices and their participation in care across many departments in the hospital give them a unique under­standing of the challenges in managing multiple critically ill patients at once.
References
1. Glasgow S, Davenport R, Perkins Z, Tai N, Brohi K.A comprehen-
sive review of blood product use in civilian mass casualty events. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;75(3):468–74.
2. Mangunta VR, Patel D.The era of mass casualty events: perspec-
tives on care paradigms from Mangunta a critical care anesthesiolo­gist. Mo Med. 2019;116(1):49–52.
3. Thomas A.An overview of the medical emergency response team
(MERT) in Afghanistan: a paramedic’s perspective. J Paramed Pract. 2014;6(6):296–302.
4. Eastman AB.Wherever the dart lands: toward the ideal trauma sys-
tem. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;211(2):153–68.
5. Zink KA, Sambasivan CN, Holcomb JB, Chisholm G, Schreiber
MA.A high ratio of plasma and platelets to packed red blood cells in the rst 6 hours of massive transfusion improves outcomes in a large multicenter study. Am J Surg. 2009;197(5):565–70.
6. John HB, Neil MR, Lisa PE, Jim CR, Charles WK, Lynne O-GK,
etal. Causes of death in US special operations forces in the global war on terrorism: 2001–2004. Ann Surg. 2007;245(6):986–91.
7. Brian EJ, Robert ML, Peter SE, Joyce CK, Terrill TS, Paul UB, etal.
Death on the battleeld (2001–2011): implications for the future of combat casualty care. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(6 Suppl
5):S431–7.
8. Institute for Economics and Peace. Global Terrorism Index 2018:
measuring the impact of terrorism. Institute for Economics and Peace: Sydney; 2018.
9. Oakley P, Dawes R, Rhys Thomas GO III.The consultant in trauma
resuscitation and anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2014;113(2):207–10.
10. John HB, Don JD, Peter RJ, Jay JJ, Peter MF, Sumeru MW, etal. Damage control resuscitation: directly addressing the early coagu­lopathy of trauma. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care. 2007;62(2):307–10.
11. Brown JB, Guyette FX, Neal MD, Claridge JA, Daley BJ, Harbrecht BG, etal. Taking the blood bank to the eld: the design and ratio­nale of the Prehospital Air Medical Plasma (PAMPer) trial. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2015;19(3):343–50.
12. Sperry JL, Guyette FX, Brown JB, Yazer MH, Triulzi DJ, Early­Young BJ, etal. Prehospital plasma during air medical transport in trauma patients at risk for hemorrhagic shock. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(4):315–26.
13. Joshua BB, Mitchell CJ, Joseph MP, Ronald MV, Michaela WA, Timothy BR, etal. Pretrauma center red blood cell transfusion is asso­ciated with reduced mortality and coagulopathy in severely injured patients with blunt trauma. Ann Surg. 2015;261(5):997–1005.
14. Shackelford SA, Del Junco DJ, Powell-Dunford N, Mazuchowski EL, Howard JT, Kotwal RS, et al. Association of prehospital blood product transfusion during medical evacuation of combat casualties in Afghanistan with acute and 30-day survival. JAMA. 2017;318(16):1581.
15. Holcomb JB, Del Junco DJ, Fox EE, Wade CE, Cohen MJ, Schreiber MA, et al. The prospective, observational, multicenter, major trauma transfusion (PROMMTT) study: comparative effec­tiveness of a time-varying treatment with competing risks. JAMA Surg. 2013;148(2):127.
16. Doughty H, Glasgow S, Kristoffersen E. Mass casualty events: blood transfusion emergency preparedness across the continuum of care. Transfusion. 2016;56(S2):S208–16.
17. Rackham R, Kelly A. Emergency planning and business conti­nuity: why blood services must plan for both. How the EBA working group (WG) is assisting blood services. ISBT Sci Ser. 2018;13(1):51–8.
18. Klein HG, Hrouda JC, Epstein JS.Crisis in the sustainability of the US blood system. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(15):1485–8.
19. Ellingson KD, Sapiano MRP, Haass KA, Savinkina AA, Baker ML, Chung K, etal. Continued decline in blood collection and transfu­sion in the United States–2015. Transfusion. 2017;57(S2):1588–98.
20. Hébert PC, Carson JL.Transfusion threshold of 7 g per deciliter— the new normal. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(15):1459–61.
21. Murphy WG.Of mad cows and bolted horses: the economics of blood safety. Transfusion. 2012;52(11):2278–81.
22. Mulcahy AW, Kapinos KA, Briscombe B, Uscher-Pines L, Chaturvedi R, Case SR, Hlavka JP, Miller BM. Building a more sustainable US blood system. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation, RB-9939-DHHS; 2016. As of December 12, 2019: https://www.
rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9939.html
23. Snyder EL, Stramer SL, Benjamin RJ.The safety of the blood sup­ply— time to raise the bar. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(20):1882–5.
24. Ravi SJ.Strengthening health systems through international blood product sharing agreements. Health Secur. 2017;15(1):11–117.
25. Frye V, Caltabiano M, Kessler DA, Schafer H, Reboza M, Hillyer CD, etal. Evaluating a program to increase blood donation among racial and ethnic minority communities in NewYork City. Transfusion. 2014;54(12):3061–7.
26. Armed Services Blood Distribution Chart Text Version. https://
www.militaryblood.dod/about/distrib_chart_text.aspx. Accessed 6
Sept 2019 and again 12 Mar 2019.
27. Thomas B, Anania K, DeCicco A, Hamm JA.Toward resiliency in the joint blood supply chain. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation, RR-2482-DARPA; 2018. As of December 10, 2019: https://www.
rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2482.html
28. Doughty H, Rackham R.Transfusion emergency preparedness for mass casualty events. ISBT Sci Ser. 2019;14(1):77–83.
29. Disaster Operations Handbook – Coordinating the nation’s blood supply during disasters and Biological events, AABB, Maryland.
2008. Available from: http://www.aabb.org/programs/disasterre-
sponse/Documents/disastophndbkv2.pdf.
18 Blood Deployment inNatural Disasters andaMilitary inConict
https://t.me/medicina_free
165
30. Morgan SJ, Rackham RA, Penny S, Lawson JR, Walsh RJ, Ismay SL.Business continuity in blood services: two case studies from events with potentially catastrophic effect on the national provision of blood components. Vox Sang. 2015;108(2):151–9.
31. Ramsey G.Blood component transfusions in mass casualty events. Vox Sang. 2017;112(7):648–59.
32. Glasgow SM, Perkins ZB, Tai NRM, Brohi K, Vasilakis C.Development of a discrete event simulation model for evaluat­ing strategies of red blood cell provision following mass casualty events. Eur J Oper Res. 2018;270(1):362–74.
33. Mansur A, Vanany I, Arvitrida NI.Modied allocation capacitated planning model in blood supply chain management. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. 2018;337(1):012028.
34. Fahimnia B, Jabbarzadeh A, Ghavamifar A, Bell M.Supply chain design for efcient and effective blood supply in disasters. Int J Prod Econ. 2017;183(PC):700–9.
35. Simonetti A, Ezzeldin H, Walderhaug M, Anderson SA, Forshee RA.An inter-regional US blood supply simulation model to evalu­ate blood availability to support planning for emergency prepared­ness and medical countermeasures. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2018;12(2):201–10.
36. Abir M, Davis MM, Sankar P, Wong AC, Wang SC. Design of a model to predict surge capacity bottlenecks for burn mass casu­alties at a large academic medical center. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2013;28(1):23.
37. Eilat SG, Vered YG, Barbara SG.Meeting blood requirements fol­lowing terrorist attacks: the Israeli experience. Curr Opin Hematol. 2006;13(6):452–6.
38. Glasgow SM, Allard S, Doughty H, Spreadborough P, Watkins E.Blood and bombs: the demand and use of blood following the London bombings of 7 July 2005--a retrospective review. Transf Med (Oxford, England). 2012;22(4):244–50.
39. Stevens TW, Bryan MC, Andrew BL, Daniel DG, Valerie SD, Michael GM, et al. Incompatible type a plasma transfusion in patients requiring massive transfusion protocol: outcomes of an Eastern Association for the surgery of trauma multicenter study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017;83(1):25–9.
40. Lozano M, Heddle N, Williamson LM, Wang G, Aubuchon JP, Dumont LJ. Practices associated with ABO‐incompatible plate­let transfusions: a BEST collaborative international survey. Transfusion. 2010;50(8):1743–8.
41. Eastcourt LJ, Birchall J, Allard S, Bassey SJ, Hersey P, Kerr JP, etal. Guidelines for the use of platelet transfusions. Br J Haematol. 2017;176(3):365.
42. Schmidt PJ.Blood and disaster—supply and demand. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(8):617.
43. Ling G, Draghic N.Aerial drones for blood delivery. Transfusion. 2019;59(S2):1608–11.
44. Spinella PC, Dunne J, Beilman GJ, O’Connell RJ, Borgman MA, Cap AP, et al. Constant challenges and evolution of US military transfusion medicine and blood operations in combat. Transfusion. 2012;52(5):1146–53.
45. David KS, John HB, Gary NC, John HR.Fresh whole blood trans­fusion: a controversial military practice. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care. 2006;61(1):181–4.
46. Miller BT, Lin AH, Clark SC, Cap AP, Dubose JJ. Red tides: mass casualty and whole blood at sea. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018;85(1S Suppl 2):S134–9.
47. Beckett A, Callum J, da Luz LT, Schmid J, Funk C, Glassberg E, etal. Fresh whole blood transfusion capability for special operations forces. Can J Surg. 2015;58(3 Suppl 3):S153–6.
48. Garcia Hejl C, Martinaud C, Macarez R, Sill J, Le Golvan A, Dulou R, et al. The implementation of a multinational “walking blood bank” in a combat zone: the experience of a health service team deployed to a medical treatment facility in Afghanistan. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;78(5):949–54.
49. Joint Trauma System Clinical Practice Guideline (JTS CPG ID:21)– Whole Blood Transfusion. 15 May 2018. Available on the Internet at the following address: https://jts.amedd.army.mil/assets/
docs/cpgs/JTS_Clinical_Practice_Guidelines_(CPGs)/Whole_ Blood_Transfusion_15_May_2018_ID21.pdf.
50. Tamara BR, Mark YH, Michael MA, Roland FL, Wilbur MW, James SR, etal. An evaluation of methods for producing low-titer group O whole blood to support military trauma resuscitation. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017;82(6S Suppl 1):S79–86.
51. Yazer MH, Seheult J, Kleinman S, Sloan SR, Spinella PC.Who’s afraid of incompatible plasma? A balanced approach to the safe transfusion of blood products containing ABO‐incompatible plasma. Transfusion. 2018;58(2):532–8.
52. Cap AP, Beckett A, Benov A, Borgman M, Chen J, Corley JB, etal. Whole blood transfusion. Mil Med. 2018;183(suppl 2):44–51.
53. Doughty H, Strandenes G.Whole blood in disaster and major inci­dent planning. ISBT Sci Ser. 2019;14(3):323–31.
54. Hakre S, Peel S, O’Connell R, Sanders-Buell E, Jagodzinski L, Eggleston C, et al. Transfusion—transmissible viral infections among US military emergency transfusion recipients. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2010;25(S2):s99.
55. Kaada SH, Apelseth TO, Hagen KG, Kristoffersen EK, Gjerde S, Sønstabø K, et al. How do I get an emergency civilian walking blood bank running? Transfusion. 2019;59(S2):1446–52.
56. Max MM, Rich CG, Lalin NM, Iain SRM, Jowan P-BM, Luke KM, etal. Outcomes following trauma laparotomy for hypotensive trauma patients: a UK military and civilian perspective. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018;85(3):620–5.
57. Beaume S, Prunet B, Cotte J, Guyen CN, Aguillon P, Vinciguerra D, etal. Utilisation du plasma lyophilisé (PLYO) en salle d’accueil des urgences vitales (SAUV) pour l’accueil des traumatisés graves. Annales francaises d’anesthesie et de reanimation. 2014;33:A125.
58. Sailliol A, Martinaud C, Cap A, Civadier C, Clavier B, Deshayes A, etal. The evolving role of lyophilized plasma in remote dam­age control resuscitation in the French armed forces health service. Transfusion. 2013;53(s1):65S–71S.
59. Nguyen C, Bordes J, Cungi P-J, Esnault P, Cardinale M, Mathais Q, et al. Use of French lyophilized plasma transfusion in severe trauma patients is associated with an early plasma transfusion and early transfusion ratio improvement. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018;84(5):780–5.
60. Gould SA, Moore EE, Moore FA, Haenel JB, Burch JM, Sehgal H, et al. Clinical utility of human polymerized hemoglobin as a blood substitute after acute trauma and urgent surgery. J Trauma. 1997;43(2):325.
61. Moore EE, Moore FA, Fabian TC, Bernard AC, Fulda GJ, Hoyt DB, et al. Human polymerized hemoglobin for the treatment of hemorrhagic shock when blood is unavailable: the USA multicenter trial. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;208(1):1–13.
62. Hickman DA, Pawlowski CL, Shevitz A, Luc NF, Kim A, Girish A, et al. Intravenous synthetic platelet (SynthoPlate) nanocon­structs reduce bleeding and improve ‘golden hour’ survival in a porcine model of traumatic arterial hemorrhage. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):1–14.
Commonly Prescribed Medications that
https://t.me/medicina_free
Affect Clotting: AComprehensive Overview
AnithaShelvan, AllysonL.Spence, AnneLeeParsiola, PrathimaAnandi, HarishSiddaiah, DustinLatimer, J.ArthurSaus, AmitPrabhakar, DanielE.Core, ElyseM.Cornett, andAlanDavidKaye
19
Introduction
Within our vasculature, blood must maintain uidity while still clotting quickly during times of vascular injury. When a blood vessel is damaged, the nely regulated hemostasis processrepairs the vascular injury to limit blood loss. Under normal circumstances, hemostasis maintains the intricate balance between coagulation and brinolysis. Dysregulation of this pathway can lead to two extremes: thrombosis or hemorrhage [1].
A thrombosis, or blood clot, can occur in veins or arteries, and both types of blood clots can be deadly. Thromboembolic diseases are also the leading cause of death in developed
A. Shelvan · A. L. Parsiola · P. Anandi · H. Siddaiah · D. Latimer J. A. Saus · E. M. Cornett Department of Anesthesiology, LSU Health Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, USA e-mail:
ashelv@lsuhsc.edu; aparsi@lsuhsc.edu; panan4@lsuhsc.edu; hbanga@lsuhsc.edu; dlatim@lsuhsc.edu; jsaus@lsuhsc.edu; ecorne@lsuhsc.edu
A. L. Spence Department of Pharmaceutical Science, Regis University, Denver, CO, USA e-mail: aspence002@regis.edu
A. Prabhakar Emory University School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Atlanta, GA, USA
D. E. Core LSU Health Shreveport School of Medicine, Shreveport, LA, USA e-mail: dcore@lsuhsc.edu
A. D. Kaye ( Department of Anesthesiology and Pharmacology, Toxicology, and Neurosciences, Louisiana State University School of Medicine­Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, USA
LSU Health Shreveport School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA
Tulane School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA e-mail: akaye@lsuhsc.edu
*)
countries [2]. A coronary arterial thrombosis can lead to a heart attack and a cerebral thrombosis can lead to a stroke– two of the leading causes of death in the United States [3]. Venous thrombosis frequently develops in the deep veins of the leg (deep vein thrombosis, or DVT). These clots can break free and enter the arteries of the lungs, resulting in a pulmonary embolism (PE) [4]. DVTs are the source of more than 90% of patients who suffer from a PE [5]. Furthermore, venous thromboembolisms (VTEs) are common, affecting nearly 900,000 people in the United States every year and killing up to one-third of these individuals [6]. Estimates have shown that VTEs cost the United States healthcare sys­tem approximately $7–10 billion each year [7]. Despite these alarming statistics, incidences involving VTEs have persisted for the past few decades. Thrombosis isprimarilyassociated with events that can result in a dysregulation of the hemo­static pathway, such as prolonged immobility, obesity, can­cer, and surgery. As the prevalence of these events continues to increase, there are surmounting fears that the incidence of VTEs will also increase [8].
Antithrombotic therapies have been used to prevent blood clots for nearly 80years [2]. The two classes of antithrom­botic drugs include anticoagulants, which block various steps in the coagulation cascade, and antiplatelet drugs, which attenuate platelet activation and clot formations [9]. The type and doseof medication administered vary accord­ing to each patient’s risk of thrombosis, bleeding complica­tions and cost [10].
The most extensively prescribed and studied anticoagu­lants for the prevention of VTEs include heparin and its derivatives and vitamin K antagonists, such as warfarin [2]. Heparin, which is found in the secretory granules of mast cells, can be extracted from animal sources, such as bovine and porcine. Unfractionated heparin (UFH) and the low­molecular- weight heparins (LMWHs) indirectly alter antico­agulant activity through their activation of antithrombin, which is a naturally occurring blood thinner andinactivates
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021 C. S. Scher et al. (eds.), Essentials of Blood Product Management in Anesthesia Practice,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59295-0_19
167
168
https://t.me/medicina_free
A. Shelvan et al.
enzymes associated with the coagulation pathway [11]. These drugs are commonly prescribed following orthopedic surgeries of the lower extremities to prevent VTEs [2]. Warfarin is another anticoagulant that protectsagainst VTEs. Heparin is parenterally administered and warfarin can be orally administered. Since the coagulation pathway involves a vitamin K-dependent step, warfarin produces its anticoagu­lant activity through its ability to block the activation of vita­min K in the body [12].
While anticoagulants interfere with the enzymes involved in the coagulation cascade, antiplatelet drugs interfere with the binding of platelets, thus preventing the actual formation of blood clots [9]. For decades, aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) has been considered the “gold standard” for preventing arte­rial thromboses [13, 14]. Although aspirin is efcacious in reducing the risk of recurrent VTE, warfarin and other anti­coagulants aremore effective [15, 16].
In contrast to the action of preventing or retarding blood clot formation by use of antithrombotic therapies, antibri­nolytic agents reduce excessive bleeding by reducing the rate of clot breakdown.Theyare used to prevent excessive bleed­ing and induce the formation of blood clots [17]. Fibrin is an important protein in the coagulation cascade system and is crucial during the formation of blood clots [18]. By inhibit­ing brinolysis, or the enzymatic breakdown of brin within blood clots, antibrinolytic agents cansignicantly reduce bleeding. They are commonly administered during surgeries associated with a high risk of bleeding, such as cardiac sur­geries [19]. Tranexamic acid has exhibited signicant ef­cacy in reducing the number of patients that require blood transfusions following cardiac and orthopedic surgeries [17,
20]. Tranexamic acid is also effective in treating hemophilia
and cyclic heavy menstrual bleeding [21].
Coagulation modiers must be carefully monitored, and doses properly adjusted to ensure efcacious therapy, while reducing potentially dangerous and life-threatening adverse effects. Although antithrombotic therapies are relatively effective they produce a highly variable anticoagulant effect in patients and require thorough monitoring and ongoing patient education. Many commonly prescribed anticoagulants (e.g., warfarin and heparin) have a narrow therapeutic window, and careful monitoring must occur to lower the risk of blood clots and, avoidbleeding complica­tions [22]. Just as antithrombotic therapies must be closely monitored to reduce the risk of adverse bleeding events, coagulants must be closely monitored as they increase the risk of VTE [17, 23].
Furthermore, patients who are prescribed coagulation modiers must be educated on the potential drug and herb interactions that can exacerbate the side effects of these med­ications [24]. NSAIDs, such as ibuprofen, are some of the most commonly administered over-the-counter medications, but these drugs are contraindicated in individuals who are
taking antithrombotic agents as the co-administration of these drugs can increase the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding [25]. Herbal products, such as garlic and ginkgo biloba, can increase the risk of hemorrhage when combined with antithrombotic drugs. Other herbal products, including St. John’s wort and ginseng, are contraindicated. Theycan decrease the efcacy of anticoagulants and anti­platelet drugs [26]. Other combinations of drugsmust alsobe closely monitored. For example, ifantidepressants, such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), are added to warfarin therapy, the patient must be carefully monitored for bleeding [27, 28].
Although coagulation modiers have important implica­tions for therapeutic use, these drugs require careful moni­toring, thorough patient education, and a good relationship between healthcare providers and patients. This willensure effective therapeutic results and reduce complications. In this paper, we will discuss anticoagulants, antibrinolytics, and antiplatelets and interactions that can occur with these medications.
Anticoagulants
Several common anticoagulants have important intraopera­tive implications. New oral anticoagulants, such as the direct thrombin inhibitors (dabigatran) and Factor Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, and betrixaban), have been approved by FDA for various clinical indications. They are efcacious in treating thromboprophylaxis and preventing deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Additionally, these medications have favorable pharmacodynamic and pharma­cokinetic properties.
Although warfarin has been the “standby” medication for oral anticoagulation for many years, warfarin exerts antico­agulant activity through adifferent mechanism of action than “direct oral anticoagulants” (DOAC, formerly known as novel oral anticoagulants) [29, 30]. Compared with tradi­tional oral anticoagulants like warfarin, DOACs have better safety prole, can be administered in xed daily doses, do not require periodic monitoring of the international normal­ized ratio (INR), and have less drug-drug interactions. Thismakes the administration of these drugs easier and safer [3134].
To properly manage the effects of anticoagulants during the intraoperative or perioperative period, medical personnel should be familiar with the mechanism of action, indications, contraindications, dosing, side effects, and drug interactions associated with these medications. Currently, there are four dif­ferent mechanismsof action associated with anticoagulants:
• vitamin K antagonist (coumarin, warfarin)
• Heparin and the low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH)
• Direct thrombin inhibitors
19 Commonly Prescribed Medications that Aect Clotting: AComprehensive Overview
https://t.me/medicina_free
169
• Factor Xa inhibitors Adiagram of the coagulation cascadedemonstrating the
conversion of prothrombin to thrombin, and the central role of thrombin in not only converting brinogen to brin but also of its enzymatic role in stabilizing the brin clot isshown in Fig.19.1 [35].
The formation of Factors II, VII, IX, and X, all of which
are necessary in the intrinsic and extrinsic coagulation cas­cade, depends on the presence of vitamin K.Factor II (pro­thrombin), which has such a critical role in coagulation, has 10 glutamic acids in the amino-terminal region of the protein, which are carboxylated. Without vitamin K, the carboxylation does not occur, and the proteins that are syn­thesized to become prothrombin are biologically inactive [36].
While vitamin K is found in several foods, including
leafy green vegetables, cauliower, and calves’ liver, in most cases the absence of dietary vitamin K is not deleteri­ous. Bacteria found in the large intestine synthesize vitamin K; this is the primary source of vitamin K in the human body. vitamin K is a fat-soluble vitamin. Both vitamin K consumed in the diet and vitamin K formed by microbial action are absorbed into intestinal lymph along with other lipids. Since vitamin K is a fat-soluble material, intestinal absorption depends upon bile secretion into the intestine. Liver disease that results in decreased bile synthesis leads to impaired vitamin K absorption; in turn, this results in a vita­min K deciency. Additionally, a majority of clotting factors are synthesized almost exclusively in the liver. Liver disease can cause defects in blood clotting by several mechanisms.
Both reduced absorption of vitamin K and reduced synthe­sis of other factors necessary for coagulation by the diseased liver predisposes to the bleeding tendency often seen in patients with severe hepatic cirrhosis [36].
In pregnancy, thefetus obtains vitamin K from its mother through the placenta. The liver in the neonate has essentially no reserve of vitamin K, and deciency of vitamin K in human infants can lead to the hemorrhagic disease of vitamin K deciency bleeding (VKDB) of the newborn [3739].
Newborn infants have low vitamin K reserves. Some explanationsfor this low vitamin K are below.
1. Vitamin K transport across the placental barrier is
limited.
2. Theliver storage of vitamin K is very low.
3. The vitamin K cycle may not be fully functional in new-
borns, especially premature infants.
4. The vitamin K content of breast milk is low.
5. Infants whose mothers are on antiseizure medications are
at risk for vitamin K deciency.
Lack of vitamin K intake, or situations, which interfere with absorption of vitamin K synthesized by bacteria, may result in a vitamin K deciency in the newborn, leading to death or permanent brain damage [40]. Newborn babies who are exclusively breast-fed are at increased risk for vitamin K deciency, because human milk is relatively low in vitamin K, compared to formula. Because VKDB is life threatening and easily prevented, the American Academy of Pediatrics and a number of similar international organizations recom-
Fig. 19.1 Coagulation
cascade (Modied from [35])
170
https://t.me/medicina_free
A. Shelvan et al.
mend that an intramuscular dose of phylloquinone (vitamin K1) be administered to all newborns [38].
In the formation of the active coagulation factors II, VII, IX, and X, the chemically reduced form of vitamin K reacts with the target protein containing a glutamic acid to create a gamma carboxy glutamic acid. The chemically reduced form of vitamin K becomes an oxidized version (vitamin K oxide). The vitamin K oxide is then reduced back to the original vitamin K to once again react with the target protein to form more active coagulation factors. Coumarin deriva­tives such as dicumarol and warfarin provide anticoagula­tion effects by interfering with the recycling of vitamin K and thereby with the production of Factors II, VII, IX, and X, all of which are necessary for the clotting cascade to occur. This interference resultsin a lower concentration of these proteins and interferes with the coagulation process, See Fig.19.2 [36].
Heparin administration has been the primary injectable anticoagulant for many years. Heparin and the newer low­molecular-weight heparin medications, enoxaparin (Lovenox), and dalteparin (Fragmin), function as anticoagu­lants by blocking the action of Factors X and II (prothrom­bin); this action provides anticoagulation by inhibiting the conversion of brinogen to brin.
Direct Factor Xa Inhibitors (The Four Drugs withNames Ending in-Aban)
Activated Factor X (Factor Xa) enzymatically cleaves two sites on prothrombin to produce thrombin. In turn, throm­bin acts as a serine protease to convert soluble brinogen into insoluble strands of brin and to also convert Factor XIII to the activated Factor XIIIa. This thrombin-induced activation of Factor XIIIa cross-links strands of brin to form the more stable brin clot (as can be easily seen in the drawing of the coagulation cascade illustrated in Fig.19.1), thrombin, acting as a serine protease, functions in a “positive feedback manner” (follow the green arrows
in the drawing) to enhance further thrombin formation and to enhance cross-linked brin clot formation.
As a result, any agent that interferes with the conversion of prothrombin to thrombin, such as Factor Xa inhibitors, is a very potent anticoagulant [
41]. Medications which directly
inhibit the action of Factor Xa do not require other cofactors, such as antithrombin, to exert their anticoagulation effects.
Currently, there are four oral medications available, which function as selective, direct inhibitors of Factor Xa: rivaroxa­ban (Xarelto), apixaban (Eliquis) and edoxaban (Savaysa), and betrixaban (Bevyxxa). These direct inhibitors of Factor Xa reduce thrombin generation and thrombus formation byinhibiting free and clot bound Factor Xa, prothrombinase activity, and thrombin-induced platelet aggregation. Whenever these medications are used changes are observed in prothrom­bin time (PT), international normalized ratio (INR), and acti­vated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). However,evaluations of these parameters are not useful to moniterthe anticoagulant effect induced by Factor Xa inhibitors.
Rivaroxaban
Rivaroxaban (Xarelto) is an orally administered, direct Factor Xa inhibitor and was the rst oral direct Factor Xa inhibitor to gain approval for human use. It targets both free and clot-bound Factor Xa and Factor Xa in the prothrombi­nase complex, thereby prolonging clotting times [41]. This effect is signicantly different than the effects exerted by indirect Factor Xa inhibitors. Rivaroxaban binds directly and reversibly to Factor Xa and exerts action by competitively inhibiting the activity of Factor Xa. It is more than 10,000­fold more selective for Factor Xa than for other related serine proteases, and it does not inhibit other serine proteases at concentrations up to 20μM [42]. Thrombin generation was almost completely inhibited at therapeutically relevant con­centrations (80–100nM) of rivaroxaban [43, 44]. The onset of action of rivaroxaban is rapid; maximum PT prolongation was seen 1–4h after tablet intake, and PT prolongation cor­related with plasma rivaroxaban concentrations (up to 500μg/L) in an almost linear fashion [45].
Fig. 19.2 Vitamin K and
warfarin (Modied from [36])
19 Commonly Prescribed Medications that Aect Clotting: AComprehensive Overview
https://t.me/medicina_free
171
Rivaroxaban is used for thromboembolic prophylaxis, such as venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis after total knee replacement (TKR) or total hip replacement (THR). Rivaroxaban has also been used as secondary pre­vention after recent acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and for stroke prevention in patients who have atrial brillation [42]. When used for the prevention of venous thromboembolism following hip or knee replacements, extended therapy for at least 3months or longer is usually recommended [46]. In the presence of signicant renal or hepatic impairment, theuse of rivaroxaban may be contraindicated, or at least signicant reduction in the dosage may be needed [41, 46]. Clearance of rivaroxaban depends on the cytochrome P3A4 system. Use is not recommended in patients receiving concomitant sys­temic treatment with strong inhibitors of CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein–azole-antimycotics (e.g., ketoconazole) or HIV protease inhibitors (e.g., ritonavir) because they may increase rivaroxaban plasma concentrations to a clinically relevant degree. Since rifampin strongly induces CYP3A4, co-administration with rifampin led to a decrease in effect and more rapid clearance of the administered dose. Co-administration with naproxen (500mg), aspirin (500mg followed by 100 mg), clopidogrel (300 mg followed by 75 mg), enoxaparin (40 mg), and warfarin (titrated to and INR of 2.0–3.0) did not affect the pharmacokinetics of rivar­oxaban [42].
Adverse side effects of rivaroxaban include intracranial hemorrhage, gastrointestinal bleeding, and an increased risk of PE or DVT. The most common adverse reaction (>5%) isbleeding, increased risk of stroke after discontinuation in nonvalvular atrial brillation, and spinal/epidural hematoma [47]. When compared to other direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC), rivaroxaban has the highest proportion of reported adverse events. The risk of breakthrough venous thrombo­embolism appears higher than for other DOACs, but this appears to be more likely when other underlying disease pro­cesses are also present [42, 48].
Apixaban
Apixaban (Eliquis), another orally administered direct Factor Xa inhibitor, has similar indications to rivaroxaban. Similar to other anticoagulants, the most signicant side effect is a dose-dependent increased risk of bleeding [31, 47]. Of all Factor Xa inhibitors, apixaban demonstrates the least depen­dence on renal metabolism, but current guidelines still advise dose modications depending on creatinine clearance, age, and body weight [41]. Dosing of apixaban is dependent on the clinical scenario; for VTE prophylaxis in surgical patients, 2.5mg twice daily for 12–25days is recommended. For secondary prevention or treatment of VTE, the recom­mendation generally is administration of 10mg twice daily for 7days followed by 5mg twice daily. For prevention of cerebrovascular accidents due to thromboembolism in
patients who have atrial brillation and any two of the fol­lowing: age 80years, body weight 60kg, or serum creati­nine 1.5mg/dL, dosing of 2.5mg or 5mg twice daily is recommended [ ban appeared to show the lowest rate of adverse event occur­rence [47].
41]. When compared to other DOACs, apixa-
Edoxaban
Like rivaroxaban and apixaban, edoxaban (Savaysa) is an oral direct Factor Xa inhibitor. Additionally, edoxaban has a >10,000-fold selectivity for Factor Xa as compared to throm­bin, which makes it efcient as an anticoagulation medica­tion [49]. The indications for use of edoxaban include venous thromboembolism treatment and prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients who have atrial brillation [50]. Use of Edoxaban is not recommended in individuals who are pregnant, those who have mechanical heart valves, or those who have creatinine clearances >95 mL/min or <15mL/min. When used for patients who have atrial brilla­tion the most common adverse reaction is bleeding and ane­mia (5%). When used in patients with DVT and pulmonary embolism the risk of bleeding, rash, or abnormal liver func­tion tests is reported to be 1% [51]. Again, like rivaroxaban and apixaban, major side effects include increased risk of bleeding and increased risk of spinal or epidural hematoma following spinal puncture or administration of neuraxial anesthesia. In those undergoing treatment for Venous Thromboembolism, the recommended edoxaban dosing is 30–60mg once daily following 5days of parenteral antico­agulation [41].
Betrixaban
Betrixaban (Bevyxxa) is alsoan orally administered Factor Xa inhibitor. It is dosed only once a day and is excreted pri­marily in the bile, with very low (approximately 17%) renal excretion [52]. Betrixabanselectively blocks the active site of Factor Xa and does not require a cofactor (such as Anti­thrombin III) for activity. Betrixaban inhibits free and pro­thrombinase bound Factor Xa in a concentration-dependent manner, thereby decreasing thrombin generation [53]. Studies demonstrate that betrixaban provides more potent inhibition of the thrombin–antithrombin complex, and F1 + 2 generation when compared with fondaparinux. Betrixaban has no direct effect on platelet aggregation.
Similar to other Factor Xa inhibitors, its indications are primarily prophylactic to prevent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in adult patients hospitalized for an acute medical ill­ness, and who are at risk for thromboembolic complications due to moderate or severe restricted mobility, and have other risk factors for VTE.Currently, it is the only FDA-approved direct oral anticoagulant for extended-duration prophylaxis of VTE in acute medically ill patients. While studies did not demonstrate superiority to enoxaparin in the prevention of
172
https://t.me/medicina_free
A. Shelvan et al.
major and non-major bleeding in total knee replacement patients in the phase 2 EXPERT trial, effective antithrom­botic activity was demonstrated at 15-mg and 40-mg doses, and these doses were well tolerated. In the phase 2 EXPLORE-Xa trial in patients with nonvalvular atrial bril­lation, betrixaban doses of 40, 60, and 80mg demonstrated the lowest occurrence of any bleeding events. The risk of bleeding was comparable to well-controlled warfarin in patients with atrial brillation at risk for stroke. The use of Betrixaban was associated with higher rates of diarrhea than with use of warfarin [52].
Although there is no data recommending the use of betrixaban in pregnant women, it is expected that use of this medication (and all direct Factor Xa inhibitors) would increase the risk of hemorrhage during labor and delivery. Additionally, patients with severe renal impairment (creati­nine clearance greater than 15ml/min but less than 30ml/ min) may have an increased risk of bleeding events. No dos­age adjustment is needed for patients with creatinine clear­ance greater than 30ml/min. Patients with hepatic impairment frequently have intrinsic coagulation abnormalities. Betrixaban has not been tested in patients with hepatic impairment andtherefore, use in these patients is not recom­mended. The safety and effectiveness in pediatric patients have not been established. Betrixaban is supplied as 40 and 80mg capsules.
Fondaparinux
Fondaparinux is a synthetic anticoagulant based on the pen­tasaccharide sequence, which makes up the minimal anti­thrombotic binding region of heparin. Fondaparinux functions by mimicking the site where heparin binds to Antithrombin III, thereby enhancing the anticoagulant action of ATIII [54]. It is a highly selective, indirect inhibi­tor of activated Factor X.Fondaparinux has no interaction with platelets, and it has a longer half-life than heparin. It does not actually inhibit thrombin, but instead functions as an indirect inhibitor of Factor Xa. Initial studies in patients following total hip replacements demonstrated that at mini­mum doses of 1.5 mg/day, less venous thromboembolism occurred than in patients who were treated with Fondaparinux than in those treated with 30mg enoxaparin injections each 12h. However, excessive bleeding was also noted in these patients when they received daily injections of 6 or 8mg per day. Use of Fondaparinux has been recommended in the situation when anticoagulation effects are desirable, yet the patient exhibits a hypersensitivity to low molecular weight and unfractionated heparins [55]. Further studies suggested that when Fondaparinux was administered to a patient dur­ing her pregnancy, there was no detectable effect in the fetus, implying that there was no placental transfer of the medication [56].
Direct Thrombin Inhibitors
Dabigatran
Another DOAC, dabigatran (Pradaxa), has some similarities and some differences when compared to direct Factor Xa inhibitors. Like these medications, dabigatran is used for venous thromboembolic prophylaxis and treatment, and for secondary prevention after the occurrence of an acute coro­nary syndrome. Unlike the direct Factor Xa Inhibitors, dabi­gatran is a reversible, oral, direct thrombin (Factor IIa) inhibitor with a half-life of approximately 12–14 h [30]. Dabigatran usually exerts a maximum anticoagulation effect within 2–3h of ingestion, but while not affecting the bio­availability of the drug, fatty foods delay its absorption. Dabigatran inhibits both free and clot-bound thrombin; it also inhibits thrombin-induced platelet aggregation. Dabigatran inhibits the conversion of brinogen into brin during the coagulation cascade and prevents development of a thrombus. As a result, dabigatran prolongs coagulation markers such as aPTT, ecarin clotting time (ECT), and thrombin time (TT). The degree of anticoagulant activity can be assessed by ECT and aPTT [33, 57].
The use of dabigatran is not recommended in patients with renal insufciency [41]. Use of dabigatran carries a major risk of gastrointestinal bleeding and intracranial hem­orrhage. Dabigatran had the highest reported rates of isch­emic stroke [47]. Other contraindications to use of dabigatran include obesity and concurrent use of p-glycoprotein inhibi­tors or inducers such as ketoconazole, verapamil, or rifampin. The most common adverse reactions with dabigatran (>15%) are gastritis-like symptoms and bleeding, increased risk of thrombotic events after premature discontinuation, and thromboembolic and bleeding events in patients with pros­thetic heart valves [58].
When used as VTE prophylaxis in surgical patients, dosing for dabigatran is 110 mg one to four hours after surgery, followed by 220mg once daily for 28–35 days (total hip replacement) or 10 days (total knee replace­ment). If being used for VTE treatment, 5–10days of par­enteral anticoagulation should be administered initially; then dabigatran is administered at a dose of 150mg twice daily [41].
Indications forUse
Currently, DOACs are approved for the following indications:
1. Prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients
with non-valvular atrial brillation (NVAF)
2. Treatment of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmo-
nary embolism (PE) and prevention of recurrence of these conditions
3. Prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients
undergoing hip and knee replacement surgery
19 Commonly Prescribed Medications that Aect Clotting: AComprehensive Overview
https://t.me/medicina_free
173
Administration andDosing Recommendations forDOACs
When considering DOAC use, periodically assess renal function as clinically indicated and adjust therapy accord­ingly [52]. FDA recommended dosing is for the following indications: [39, 59, 60].
1. Prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial brillation (NVAF): Dabigatran 150mg orally, twice daily (BID) in patients with creatinine clearance (CrCl) >30mL/min and 75mg orally, BID in patients with CrCl 15–30mL/min. Rivaroxaban 20mg orally, once daily (OD) with the eve­ning meal in patients with CrCl >50mL/min and 15mg orally, OD with the evening meal in patients with CrCl 15–50mL/min. Apixaban 5 mg orally BID and 2.5 mg orally BID in patients with at least two of the following characteristics: age 80years, body weight 60kg, or serum creatinine 1.5mg/dL. Edoxaban 60 mg OD in patients with CrCl >50 to 95 mL/min and avoid in patients with CrCl >95 mL/ min, 30mg OD in patients with CrCl 15–50mL/min.
2. Treatment of DVT and PE and prevention of recurrence of these conditions: Dabigatran 150mg orally, BID after previous treatment in patients with CrCl >30mL/min. Rivaroxaban 15 mg orally BID with food for the rst 21days followed by 20mg orally OD with food, for pre­vention of recurrence 10mg OD after at least 6months of standard anticoagulant treatment [61]. Apixaban 10 mg BID for 7days and 5mg BID afterward [62]. Edoxaban 60 mg OD and 30 mg OD for patients with CrCl 15–50mL/min or body weight 60kg or who use certain P-gp inhibitors
3. Prevention of VTE in patients undergoing hip and knee replacement surgery. Dabigatran 110mg orally rst day, then 220mg OD in patients with CrCl >30mL/min. Rivaroxaban 10mg orally OD with or without food. Apixaban 2.5 mg BID. Treatment is recommended for 35days in hip and 12days in knee replacement surgery.
Side Eects andContraindications
The most common adverse reactions with dabigatran (>15%) are gastritis-like symptoms and bleeding, increased risk of thrombotic events after premature discontinuation, and thromboembolic and bleeding events in patients with pros­thetic heart valves [63, 64]. With rivaroxaban, the most com­mon adverse reaction (>5%) was bleeding, increased risk of stroke after discontinuation in nonvalvular atrial brillation, and spinal/epidural hematoma [65, 66]. With edoxaban, the most common adverse reactions when used for NVAF are
bleeding and anemia (5%), and when used for DVT and PE are bleeding, rash, abnormal liver function tests, and anemia (1%) [ reactions (>1%) are related to bleeding and increased risk of thrombotic events after premature discontinuation [69]. Dabigatran and Factor Xa inhibitor drugs are contraindicated in patients with active pathological bleeding, ahistory of a serious hypersensitivity reaction to dabigatran, and mechani­cal prosthetic heart valve [39, 59, 60].
67, 68]. With apixaban, the most common adverse
IV Administered Direct Thrombin Inhibitors
Bivalirudin (Angiomax) and argatroban also function as inhibitors of coagulation but are not considered as “DOACs” since they must be administered by the IV route, not the oral route. Bivalirudin is a synthetic derivative of Hirudin, a com­pound found in the salivary glands of the medicinal leech (Hirudo medicinalis). As such, sometimes it is humorously referred to as “snail spit.” Bivalirudin is a potent and highly specic inhibitor of thrombin (Factor IIa). Following IV administration, it inhibits both circulating and clot-bound thrombin and also inhibits thrombin-mediated platelet activa­tion and aggregation. Due to its quick onset of action and short half-life, its antithrombotic response is very predictable. While bivalirudin directly inhibits thrombin, it is not related to heparin and therefore presents no risk of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). It may be used in those patients sus­ceptible to HIT. Although there is currently no medication thatcan be administered to terminate or inhibit bivalirudin’s action, it is cleared by a combination of renal mechanisms (approximately 20%) and proteolytic cleavage (approxi­mately 80%) by proteins present in blood serum and liver.
The expected half-life of bivalirudin anticoagulation action is about 25 min in patients with normal renal function, and return to baseline coagulation times can be expected to occur within about an hour after discontinuation of a bivalirudin infu­sion; this may be prolonged to just under an hour in patients with severe renal dysfunction. When administered to a patient with severe renal impairment, dose adjustments are needed [70]. The half-life of anticoagulation activity may be prolonged to about 3.5h in patients who are dialysis dependent.
In the United Sates, typical dosing for bivalirudin is an initial IV bolus of 0.75mg/kg of patient body weight, fol­lowed by an infusion of 1.75 mg/kg/hr. Although not approved for cardiac surgery or other perioperative use, bivalirudin is the only “alternative anticoagulant”, which has been prospectively studied in cardiac surgery for use in HIT and non-HIT patients [71]. When used as the anticoagulant for cardiac surgery in which cardiopulmonary bypass will be used, often the recommended initial dose is 1.5 mg/Kg administered by IV bolus, and an additional 50mg of bivali-
174
https://t.me/medicina_free
A. Shelvan et al.
rudin is added to the cardiopulmonary bypass pump priming uid. Following administration of the initial dose, an acti­vated clotting time (ACT) can be used to monitor anticoagu­lation provided by bivalirudin. Adequate anticoagulation for cardiopulmonary bypass is documented by achieving an ACT of at least 500s and over 200s for a vascular surgery procedure such as an “off-pump” cardiopulmonary bypass. There is currently no “reversal agent” to terminate the action of bivalirudin, so termination of the anticoagulation effect depends on the patient’s intrinsic clearance mechanisms.
Argatroban
Argatroban is a direct thrombin inhibitor. TheFDA initially licensed itfor prophylaxis or thrombosis treatmentin patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). It is cur­rently used both in themanagement of HIT and for antico­agulation. Argatroban is metabolized in the liver, and clearance is primarily by hepatic metabolism. In patients who have hepatic dysfunction, adjustments in the dose of argatroban may be necessary [72]. Argatroban has a half-life of about 45–50min in patients with normal hepatic function. In patients with hepatic impairment, clearance was approxi­mately one-fourth that of healthy patients, and thehalf-life of an administered dose increased by two-to threefold [73].
To achieve adequate anticoagulation for vascular surgery, when argatroban is used, an infusion is oftenstarted with a bolus injection of 350mcg/kg over 3–5min and continued with an infusion of 25 mcg/kg/min. Argatroban is a direct thrombin inhibitor with a half-life of approximately 40–50min. This makes it less suitable as an anticoagulant for cardiac surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass since frequent monitoring and re-dosing would be required. If used for an “off-pump CABG,” an ACT of greater than 200s should be conrmed. An activated clotting time (ACT) should be checked approximately 5–10 min following the bolus injection to assure anticoagulation is adequate for the planned procedure. Like bivalirudin, there is currently no “reversal agent” to terminate the anticoagulation effects fol­lowing theadministration of argatroban. Either bivalirudin or argatroban may be used to achieve anticoagulation for car­diac surgery in patients who have persistent heparin-induced thrombocytopenia IgG antibodies.
Monitoring Anticoagulation Eects
Monitoring the anticoagulation effects, to titrate the doses to the desired effect may be challenging whenever using either bivalirudin or argatroban for anticoagulation. Although vis­coelastic testing (such as TEG or ROTEM) is used exten­sively to guide therapy at the “point of care” with procoagulants and hemostatic agents, there is little data
describing its use for parenteral direct thrombin inhibitors. Direct thrombin inhibitors, including argatroban and bivali­rudin, can increase the clot formation time but may have only a minor effect on the maximum clot strength [ ecarin clotting time can measure the concentrations of direct thrombin inhibitors more accurately [75].
74]. Use of the
Traditionally Used Anticoagulants: Warfarin andHeparin
Warfarin
Warfarin has been used in human medicine since 1954 and is the most widely used anticoagulant in the world. The history of warfarin’s discovery dates back more than 30years ear­lier. In the 1920s, cattle in the Northern United States and Canada suddenly demonstrated an unusual disease charac­terized by fatal bleeding, either spontaneously or from minor injuries. It was recognized that these cattle had been eating moldy silage made from sweet clover [39]. Scientic exami­nations demonstrated this moldy clover contained a factor causing hemorrhage by decreasing the activity of prothrom­bin. It took until 1940 when Karl Link, an American bio­chemist at the University of Wisconsin–Madison, and his student Harold Campbell were able to isolate the hemor­rhagic compound and later discovered that the identity of the anticoagulant in the sweet clover disease was dicoumarol (3,3-methylenebis-(4-hydroxy coumarin)) [59]. With fur­ther research, by 1945, Link synthesized and patented warfa­rin. It was initially approved in the United States in 1952 as a rodenticide and then was later approved as a human antico­agulant in 1954. The name warfarin derives from the initials of the “Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation” (the busi­ness entity which held the patent on the compound), WARF, and -arin from the ending of the scientic name of the pri­mary compound “coumarin” [39].
In comparison to the DOAC medications discussed previ­ously, warfarin is an oral anticoagulant that exerts its action by competitively inhibiting subunit 1 of a multi-unit vitamin K epoxide reductase complex. This decreases the carboxyl­ation of vitamin K-dependent proteins (as presented earlier in this chapter) and inhibits activation of clotting Factors II (with a half-life of 59h), VII (with a half-life of 6h), IX, and X.Warfarin also reduces the activities of regulatory antico­agulant protein C and protein S resulting in an initial proco­agulant state. Since it has no effect on fully carboxylated molecules in circulation, it takes days for theestablishment of anantithrombotic effect. Warfarin has been used as thrombo­embolic prophylaxis in individuals who have a history of atrial brillation, acute coronary syndrome, heart failure,