Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_35_библиотеки_им_акад_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
02.09.2026
Размер:
19 Мб
Скачать
14 Blood Conservation Strategies andBloodless Medicine
https://t.me/medicina_free
133
transport properties of LtEc were believed to be unaffected by storage at high temperatures or oxidation [36]. The sta­bility of Lumbricus terrestris erythrocruorin can also be increased via poly(acrylic acid) conjugation [37]. The development of red blood cells from stem cells is currently also underway. The use of pluripotent stem cells could allow for the mass production of red blood cells in the future. High production cost is the strongest limiting factor, and this could diminish over time [38].
Summary
Blood transfusions, while potentially life-saving, are fraught with risks and refusal by patients and sometimes unavailable. Blood transfusions can cause signicant morbidity and mor­tality. Bloodless medicine involves preoperative assessment of anemia and minimization of iatrogenic/surgical blood loss. Strategies are readily employed in a variety of patients including the Jehovah’s witness, the orthopedic patient, and the cardiac patient. Many blood substitutes are being devel­oped to provide red blood cells’ oxygen-carrying capability. As bloodless medicine continues to advance, the need for blood transfusions will decrease.
References
1. Blaudszun G, Butchart A, Klein AA.Blood conservation in car-
diac surgery. Transfus Med. 2018;28(2):168–80. https://doi.
org/10.1111/tme.12475.
2. Rivilla Marugán L, Lorente Aznar T, Molinero Rodriguez M,
García-Erce JA. Anaemia and the elderly: critical review of its denition and prevalence. Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol. 2019 Jul­Aug;54(4):189–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regg.2019.02.008.
3. Chen A, Trivedi AN, Jiang L, Vezeridis M, Henderson
WG, Wu WC. Hospital blood transfusion patterns during major noncardiac surgery and surgical mortality. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94(32):e1342. https://doi.org/10.1097/
MD.0000000000001342.
4. Callum JL, Waters JH, Shaz BH, etal. The AABB recommenda-
tions for the choosing wisely campaign of the American Board of Internal Medicine. Transfusion. 2014;54:2344–52.
5. Frank SM, Wick EC, Dezern AE, Ness PM, Wasey JO, Pippa
AC, etal. Clinical outcomes for bloodless patients. Transfusion. 2004;54:2668–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.12752.
6. Moskowitz DM, McCullough JN, Shander A, Klein JJ, Bodian
CA, Goldweit RS, et al. The impact of blood conservation on outcomes in cardiac surgery: is it safe and effective? Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;90(2):451–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
athoracsur.2010.04.089.
7. Álvarez JC, Santiveri FX, Ramos I, Vela E, Puig L, Escolano
F. Tranexamic acid reduces blood transfusion in total knee arthroplasty even when a blood conservation pro­gram is applied. Transfusion. 2008;48:519–25. https://doi.
org/10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01564.x.
8. American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Perioperative
Blood Management. Practice guidelines for perioperative blood
management: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on perioperative blood management. Anesthesiology. 2015;122(2):241–75.
ALN.0000000000000463
9. Shander A, Knight K, Thurer R, Adamson J, Spence R.Prevalence and outcomes of anemia in surgery: a systematic review of the literature. Am J Med. 2004;116(Suppl 7A):58S–69S.
org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2003.12.013
10. Kansagra AJ, Stefan MS. Preoperative anemia: evaluation and treatment. Anesthesiol Clin. 2016;34(1):127–41.
org/10.1016/j.anclin.2015.10.011
11. Yazicioğlu L, Eryilmaz S, Sirlak M, Inan MB, Aral A, Taşöz R, etal. Recombinant human erythropoietin administration in cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;122(4):741–5. https://doi.
org/10.1067/mtc.2001.115426
12. Abbvie Inc. Lupron Depot 3.75 mg and 3 Month 11.25 mg: Highlights of prescribing information.
pdf/lupron3month11_25mg.pdf
13. Patel AA, Zfass-Mendez M, Lebwohl NH, Wang MY, Green BA, Levi AD, etal. Minimally invasive versus open lumbar fusion: a comparison of blood loss, surgical complications, and hospital course. Iowa Orthop J. 2015;35:130–4.
14. Kiran RP, Delaney CP, Senagore AJ, Millward BL, Fazio VW.Operative blood loss and use of blood products after lapa­roscopic and conventional open colorectal operations. Arch Surg. 2004;139(1):39–42. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.139.1.39.
15. Dumousset E, Chabrot P, Rabischong B, Mazet N, Nasser S, Darcha C, etal. Preoperative uterine artery embolization (PUAE) before uterine broid myomectomy. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2008;31(3):514–20.
16. Frank SM, Wasey JO, Dwyer IM, Gokaslan ZL, Ness PM, Kebaish KM.Radiofrequency bipolar hemostatic sealer reduces blood loss, transfusion requirements, and cost for patients undergoing multi­level spinal fusion surgery: a case control study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2014;9:50.
17. De Robertis E, Kozek-Langenecker SA, Tufano R, Romano GM, Piazza O, Zito MG.Coagulopathy induced by acidosis, hypother­mia and hypocalcaemia in severe bleeding. Minerva Anestesiol. 2015;81(1):65–75.
18. Ferrara A, MacArthur JD, Wright HK, Modlin IM, McMillen MA.Hypothermia and acidosis worsen coagulopathy in the patient requiring massive transfusion. Am J Surg. 1990;160(5):515–8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(05)81018-9.
19. Dutton RP. Controlled hypotension for spinal surgery. Eur Spine J. 2004;13(Suppl 1):S66–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s00586-004-0756-7.
20. Boonmak P, Boonmak S, Laopaiboon M.Deliberate hypotension with propofol under anaesthesia for functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;(10) Art. No.: CD006623 https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006623.pub3.
21. Hughes MJ, Ventham NT, Harrison EM, Wigmore SJ. Central venous pressure and liver resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. HPB (Oxford). 2015;17(10):863–71.
org/10.1111/hpb.12462.
22. Shore-Lesserson L, Manspeizer HE, DePerio M, Francis S, Vela­Cantos F, Ergin MA. Thromboelastography-guided transfusion algorithm reduces transfusions in complex cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg. 1999;88(2):312–9.
23. Van Cott EM. Coagulation point-of-care testing. Clin Lab Med. 2001;21(2):337–50.
24. AuBuchon JP, Puca K, Saxena S, Shulman IA, Waters JH.Getting started in patient blood management. [Internet]. AABB; 2011. Available from: https://www.aabb.org/pbm/Documents/112024DB.
pdf. Accessed 10 May 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-014-0050-2.
.
.
.
. Accessed 18 Apr 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-005-0342-3.
https://doi.org/10.1097/
https://doi.
.
https://doi.
https://www.rxabbvie.com/
https://doi.
134
https://t.me/medicina_free
E. Gomez et al.
25. Esper SA, Waters JH.Intra-operative cell salvage: a fresh look at the indications and contraindications. Blood Transfus. 2011;9(2):139–
47. https://doi.org/10.2450/2011.0081-10.
26. Lawson T, Ralph C.Perioperative Jehovah’s witnesses: a review. Br J Anaesth. 2015;115(5):676–87.
aev161
27. Waters JH, Tuohy MJ, Hobson DF, Procop G. Bacterial reduc-
28. Kongsgaard UE, Wang MY, Kvalheim G.Leucocyte depletion l-
29. Jamnicki M, Kocian R, van der Linden P, Zaugg M, Spahn
30. Lindstrom E, Johnstone R. Acute normovolemic hemodilu-
31. Licker M, Ellenberger C, Sierra J, Kalangos A, Diaper J, Morel
32. Sharrock NE, Salvati EA.Hypotensive epidural anesthesia for total
.
tion by cell salvage washing and leukocyte depletion ltration. Anesthesiology. 2003;99(3):652–5.
ter removes cancer cells in human blood. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1996 Jan;40(1):118–20.
DR. Acute normovolemic hemodilution: physiology, limi­tations, and clinical use. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2003;17(6):747–54.
tion in a Jehovah’s witness patient: a case report. AANA J. 2010;78(4):326–30.
D. Cardioprotective effects of acute normovolemic hemodilution in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. Chest. 2005;128(2):838–47.
hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Scand. 1996;67:91–107.
https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/
33. Juelsgaard P, Larsen UT, Sorensen JV, Madsen F, Soballe K.Hypotensive epidural anesthesia in total knee replacement with­out tourniquet: reduced blood loss and transfusion. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2001;26:105–10.
34. Sambandam B, Batra S, Gupta R, Agrawal N.Blood conservation strategies in orthopedic surgeries: a review. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2013;4(4):164–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2013.11.002.
35. Goobie SM, Frank SM. Tranexamic acid: what is known and unknown, and where do we go from here? Anesthesiology. 2017;127:405–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/
ALN.0000000000001788
36. Muzzelo C, Neely C, Shah P, Abdulmalik O, Elmer J.Prolonging the shelf life of Lumbricus terrestris erythrocruorin for use as a novel blood substitute. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2018;46(1):39–
46.
https://doi.org/10.1080/21691401.2017.1290645.
37. Spivack K, Tucker M, Zimmerman D, Nicholas M, Abdulmalik O, Comolli N, Elmer J.Increasing the stability of Lumbricus terres­tris erythrocruorin via poly(acrylic acid) conjugation. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2018;46(sup2):1137–44.
080/21691401.2018.1480491
38. Moradi S, Jahanian-Najafabadi A, Roudkenar MH.Articial blood substitutes: rst steps on the long route to clinical utility. Clin Med Insights Blood Disord. 2016;9:33–41.
.
https://doi.org/10.1
.
When Blood Is Not anOption: Care
https://t.me/medicina_free
oftheJehovah’s Witness Patient
JustinB.Feit andSethPerelman
15
Clinical Case Description
A fty eight-year-old female Jehovah’s Witness with medi­cal history signicant for ESRD not yet on dialysis, COPD, presenting with worsening shortness of breath, found to have severe mitral regurgitation and severe tricuspid regurgitation. After consultation with surgeons, decision was made to pro­ceed with an open mitral valve and tricuspid valve replace­ments. She is referred to presurgical testing for medical and surgical optimization prior to surgery.
Introduction
Perioperative blood management is a crucial aspect of the anesthesiologist’s clinical duties. While it is important to avoid/prevent perioperative anemia due to its morbidity and mortality [1], blood product administration has its own con­sequences [2], including transfusion reactions [3], pathogen transmission [4], immunomodulation [5], transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI) [6], and transfusion-associated circulatory overload (TACO) [7]. There are indications for specic blood product transfusions, including need for increased oxygen-carrying capacity and tissue oxygenation and treatment of coagulopathy secondary to factor decien­cies or platelet dysfunction, for example [8, 9].
Despite situations in which blood product transfusion is indicated (and withholding of these products can be fatal), there are certain patients that will refuse blood product trans-
J. B. Feit NYU Langone Health, NYU School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Care, and Pain Medicine, New York, NY, USA e-mail: Justin.Feit@nyulangone.org
S. Perelman ( NYU Grossman School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Care and Pain Medicine, New York, NY, USA e-mail: Seth.perelman@nyulangone.org
*)
fusion based on religious beliefs; among these patients, the most notable population includes patients of the Jehovah’s Witness faith. These patients pose a particular challenge among anesthesiologists with respect to perioperative blood management due to their refusal of certain blood products and limited intraoperative treatment options.
Blood Transfusions
The modern history of blood transfusions began in the mid­1660s when English physician Richard Lower experimented with transfusing blood between dogs shortly before physician Jean Denis experimented with transfusing humans using blood taken from dogs [10]. In the late eighteenth century, Joseph Priestley described red blood cells as capable of carrying oxy­gen [11], shortly before French chemist Antoine Lavoisier described the importance of oxygen in respiration [12]. Further advances in blood transfusion occurred in the early nineteenth century with English obstetrician James Blundell, the “Father of Autotransfusion”; it was discovered that giving back blood lost during surgery was not only safer than transfusing animal blood to humans, but also that autotransfusion improved mor­tality in massive surgical hemorrhages [13].
Despite improved outcomes demonstrated by Blundell with human transfusion in the nineteenth century, there were many issues that needed additional research including trans­fusion reactions and blood product storage. In the early twentieth century, Karl Landsteiner, a German physician, began elucidating the ABO red blood cell antigen system which helped decrease the amount of deadly transfusion reactions signicantly [14]. Storage of blood products was increased to almost 3weeks through the discovery of adding citrate (by Richard Weil) [15] and dextrose (by Peyton Rous and JR Turner) [16]. Blood transfusions became more practi­cal for humans after World War II with the creation of the modern blood bank by Drs. Bernard Fantus and Lindon Seed out of Chicago, IL [17].
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021 C. S. Scher et al. (eds.), Essentials of Blood Product Management in Anesthesia Practice,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59295-0_15
135
136
https://t.me/medicina_free
J. B. Feit and S. Perelman
Over the 300years since Dr. Lower began his experimen­tation, there have been numerous further advances in transfu­sion medicine with respect to efcacy and safety. To this day, blood transfusions are the most common invasive procedure performed in the United States across all of medicine [18]. Blood transfusions can be lifesaving in many surgical envi­ronments, especially with increased morbidity and mortality associated with anemia, coagulopathy, and catastrophic sur­gical bleeding. However, despite well-recognized indica­tions for blood transfusion, patients who receive a blood transfusion during their hospital stay for whatever reason are also more likely to have increased length of stays and mortal­ity within 28days [19], and the efcacy of allogeneic trans­fusion has come into question.
It is important for anesthesiologists to know what types of products are available to administer and their specic indica­tions. The four most common blood products given in the perioperative period are red blood cells, platelets, fresh fro­zen plasma, and cryoprecipitate [20]. Red blood cells are used to increase the oxygen-carrying capacity in patients with anemia or with signicant blood loss that impacts tissue oxygenation [21]. Platelets are commonly administered to treat or prevent bleeding in patients with low platelet counts or with platelet dysfunction [22]. Fresh frozen plasma (FFP) is the frozen version of the uid portion of whole blood; FFP includes all of the coagulation factors with the exception of platelets [23]. FFP administration is commonly indicated in the setting of coagulation factor deciency in the presence of active bleeding [24]; other situations include planned sur­gery in the setting of abnormal coagulation and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. If FFP is thawed at 4 °C as opposed to its normal 37°C, cryoprecipitate is created [25]. While FFP contains all coagulation factors, cryoprecipitate is made up of brinogen, factor VIII, factor XIII, and Von Willebrand’s factor [25]. Cryoprecipitate is commonly administered in the setting of massive hemorrhages associ­ated with hypobrinogenemia, most commonly seen in car­diac surgery, obstetrics, and liver transplantation [25].
There are other blood product derivatives that are also used in the perioperative period including albumin, individ­ual clotting factors, prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC), and immunoglobulins.
Jehovah’s Witnesses
The Jehovah’s Witness faith was founded in 1881 by Charles Taze Russell, a Pittsburgh-based Christian minister [26]. Russell began disseminating his beliefs in Zion’s Watch Tower and Herald of Christ’s Presence, a monthly religious magazine publication that was used to spread the teachings that would eventually become the main principles of the Jehovah’s Witness faith [26]. With respect to their beliefs
regarding blood management, their teachings are based on specic passages in the bible, namely, Genesis 9:4, which states, “Only, you shall not eat esh with its life, that is, its blood” [27], and Leviticus 17:10, saying, “If anyone of the house of Israel or of the aliens who reside among them eats any blood, I will set my face against that person who eats blood, and will cut that person off from the people” [27]. These passages are interpreted to form one of the main tenets of the JW religion: their refusal of numerous types of blood products. As a result, these beliefs have led to multiple chal­lenges in the medical and surgical care of Jehovah’s Witnesses.
The JW religion includes 2,000,000 followers in the United States and over 8,000,000 worldwide [18]; it is likely that an anesthesiologist will encounter a Jehovah’s Witness as a patient and possibly in a clinical situation where blood transfusion may be clinically indicated, but patient beliefs may make this scenario medically and legally challenging.
Legality
With respect to any patient population, it is important to understand each specic patient’s requests/beliefs with regards to their medical care. Regarding blood management and Jehovah’s Witness patients, their refusal/acceptance of various blood products is deeply rooted in ancient Biblical scriptures and subsequently passed down from generation to generation [26]. With these reasons for refusing certain blood products even in life-threatening situations, it is imper­ative as anesthesiologists that we understand and respect the wishes of this patient population. Even with the widely believed notion that Jehovah’s Witnesses refuse all types of blood products, it is important to have an individualized con­versation with each patient and clearly delineate which prod­ucts are acceptable and which products are not acceptable as they may differ from patient to patient. Generally speaking, most JW patients will refuse “major blood fractions,” namely, red blood cells, white blood cells, plasma, and platelets, while some will accept “minor blood fractions,” including hemoglobin- based oxygen carriers, interferons, albumin, cryoprecipitate, and specic clotting factors [28]. Most JW patients will accept uids (crystalloids/colloids), synthetic stimulating agents (erythropoietin, thrombopoietin), recom­binant factor VIIa, and articial blood substitutes [28].
The reason why certain patients within this population may accept or refuse certain blood products differs from patient to patient based on their interpretation of the scrip­tures, and it is important to document their specic wishes in order to come up with an acceptable plan for both the provider and patient before undergoing surgery. Documenting these wishes in the medical record is of tanta-
15 When Blood Is Not anOption: Care oftheJehovah’s Witness Patient
https://t.me/medicina_free
137
mount importance before taking care of this patient popula­tion. Consulting your institution’s risk management or the JW HLS (Hospital Liaison Services) may also be of assis­tance prior to planned surgical interventions. Not only insti­tutions have legal/risk management services available for the perioperative period, but also there are specic blood consent forms that include each type of blood product/sub­stitute and allow the patient to delineate which products are acceptable or objectionable.
During most patient encounters, there is enough time to have this discussion with the patient, and it is clear what products the patient will and will not accept; what about when there is an emergency or if the patient does not have capacity to have this conversation? Many Jehovah’s Witnesses carry a Durable Power of Attorney (DPA) card that may delineate which products are and are not accept­able in the event of an emergency, but also may designate a person who will be able to make clear their wishes in the event that they cannot make their wishes known at that spe­cic time [29]. In the event of a DPA card and health-care proxy with conicting opinions on treatment options, the DPA card will ultimately override the health-care proxy. If no card or health-care proxy is immediately available in an emergency life-threatening situation, a medical provider should treat as according to the standard of care, including transfusion of any clinically indicated blood products or derivatives [29].
Acceptable andUnacceptable Treatments
As previously mentioned, there are “major blood fractions” that are generally not accepted by JW patients, and there are “minor blood fractions” that may be accepted by most JW patients. There are also products that are often accepted by most Jehovah’s Witness patients which include uids (crys­talloids and colloids), synthetic stimulating agents (erythro­poietin and thrombopoietin), recombinant factor VII, and articial blood substitutes [28]. All of these agents refer to intravenous “blood substitutes” that are part of overall blood. Topical hemostatic agents (Avitene™, Tisseel™, etc.) are generally accepted and may be used as part of surgical hemo­stasis; these agents typically work by directly activating platelets and promoting thrombin formation, thus stabilizing blood clot formation during surgical bleeding. As with other products, these topical agents should be part of the blood refusal consent process as some JW may refuse thrombin­containing products.
Additional available treatments for JW patients include extracorporeal closed loop techniques—acute normovolemic hemodilution (ANH), cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), and dialysis [28]; many of these procedures are acceptable, given
that the circuit is maintained in a closed loop conguration. ANH involves preemptive removal of blood from a patient followed by replacement with acellular uid, typically crys­talloid or colloid [30]; this process leads to decreased red blood cell loss during surgery. At the end of surgery, the removed blood is then transfused back to the patient [31].
Preoperative Assessment
Perioperative assessment is crucial in optimizing this spe­cic patient population. Traditionally, anesthesiologist’s roles with respect to patient blood management exclusively occurred in the operating room setting, but it has become more prevalent over the last 15–20years for the anesthesi­ologist to be involved in the patient’s optimization in the pre­surgical period as part of a multidisciplinary team including surgeons, internists, and hematologists [32].
Part of the preoperative assessment requires an open conversation regarding what specic products and proce­dures will be acceptable and which would be objection­able. This discussion is critical in planning for the perioperative management of the JW especially in situa­tions where blood products may be administered based on clinical indications. Ideally, this respectful discussion should happen early in the care of the patient, without the need to repeat it with each health-care provider encounter, which could be viewed as disrespectful or at worst coercion.
While there are indications for preoperative transfusion for all types of major blood products, red blood cell transfu­sion is the most common product transfused preoperatively [18]. Perioperative anemia is not only a risk factor for increased morbidity/mortality in the perioperative period [33] but also a predictor of intraoperative and postoperative red blood cell transfusions[1]; this makes correction of ane­mia in the Jehovah’s Witness population particularly crucial to improving their postoperative outcomes. However, there are opportunities to optimize their hemoglobin levels with­out using blood products [34]. There are numerous etiologies of anemia that should be identied and treated, such as iron­deciency anemia (iron), megaloblastic anemia (Vitamin B12, folate), or inadequate erythropoietin synthesis (erythro­poietin-stimulating agents) [35]. There are various formula­tions for these acceptable alternatives, including oral, intravenous, intramuscular, and subcutaneous, that give this population options to allow for preoperative optimization without the need for allogeneic transfusion. The importance of the early evaluation and treatment of preoperative anemia should not be limited to the JW population and should be part of the preoperative evaluation of all patients, but in the JW patient, it is critical.
138
https://t.me/medicina_free
J. B. Feit and S. Perelman
Perioperative Blood Management Strategies
There are many opportunities in the perioperative period to provide optimal medical/surgical care for these patients while simultaneously respecting their specic beliefs. Our obligation as physicians is not limited to a patient’s physical ailments but also extends to respecting their spiritual beliefs. In collaboration with the surgeons, it is important to mini­mize blood loss when possible. For example, use of mini­mally invasive procedures, intraoperative cell salvage, arterial tourniquets, acute normovolemic hemodilution, and permissive hypotension are all strategies that can be employed in collaboration with our surgical colleagues to minimize blood loss intraoperatively [1]. Use of interven­tional radiology when applicable, compared to open tech­niques, can also minimize blood loss [1].
Maintaining euvolemia is crucial to allow the physiologi­cal response to anemia tolerance which includes increased tissue oxygen extraction, increased cardiac output, and increased sympathetic response to maintain oxygen delivery [36]. Supplemental oxygen, along with aggressively opti­mizing preoperative lung function can help maximize oxy­gen delivery, especially in low hemoglobin states [28]. Aggressively treating high metabolic demand states both intraoperatively and postoperatively (i.e., antibiotics for sep­tic shock, mechanical support for cardiogenic shock, uids/ vasopressors for hypovolemic shock, paralysis) minimizes oxygen demand and thus compensates for potentially lower oxygen-carrying capacities [28].
Coagulation defects are often easily treated with plasma and/or platelets, but those products are usually restricted in the Jehovah’s Witness population. One of the least invasive, yet most important opportunities to minimize coagulopathies as anesthesiologists is by maintaining normothermia—hypo­thermia impairs thrombin generation as part of coagulation initiation and thus by maintaining normothermia, or more importantly avoiding hypothermia, can avoid unnecessary coagulopathies [37]. There are also many pharmacologic treatments of coagulopathy that can potentially obviate the need for plasma/platelets; these treatments include pro­thrombin complex concentrate (PCC), calcium, vitamin K, tranexamic acid (TXA)/aminocaproic acid, desmopressin, and recombinant factors among others [36]. Perioperative consultation with a hematologist can provide further guid­ance on how to use these treatments should certain reversible coagulopathies arise intra- or postoperatively.
Minimizing phlebotomy perioperatively minimizes HAA (hospital acquired anemia), which although may seem incon­sequential compared to possibly large intraoperative blood losses has been shown to lead to worse outcomes compared with patients with less iatrogenic blood loss [38]. While it is important to assess a patient’s overall clinical status using
laboratory tests, similar information can be acquired using more efcient techniques. POC (point-of-care) tests and the availability of pediatric test tubes can also limit hospital acquired anemia. Additionally, routine arterial blood gases for ventilated patients can be replaced by using continuous end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring and noninvasive oxim­etry to assess respiratory status, thus potentially limiting the need for frequent blood draws [39].
Anemia Tolerance andPatient Outcomes
While it is important to understand how anesthesiologists can use alternate therapies rather than using “major blood products,” it is also imperative to understand transfusion thresholds and how that corresponds to patient outcomes, especially in the JW population. There are situations during major hemorrhage and coagulopathy when most providers will empirically give blood products before getting any lab tests, as per widely accepted standards of care. However, there are other instances when time allows for goal-directed therapy based on POC testing, and it is up to the anesthesi­ologist to decide how to proceed with this information and whether a transfusion is indicated. With well-documented side effects, potential complications, and questionable ef­cacy of blood transfusions [40], transfusions should not be threshold based but should be based on clinical symptoms of anemia or coagulopathy.
What do we tell our patient when she comes to pre- surgical testing and asks how her religious beliefs will affect her over­all outcome? Compared to patients without personal transfu­sion restrictions, Jehovah’s Witness patients undergoing cardiac surgery who refuse all major blood products have similar short-term and long-term mortality [41]. Similarly, for Jehovah’s Witness patients undergoing cardiac surgery who refuse blood transfusions, there has been a lower incidence of postoperative myocardial infarction, shorter time to extuba­tion, shorter length of stay, and reduced costs in both the inten­sive care unit and the hospital [42]. With careful attention paid to these patients from the moment they are scheduled for sur­gery to when they leave the hospital, it is possible to have out­comes similar to those patients who are less restricted in their blood product acceptance. While these studies may indicate similar/better outcomes for JW patients compared to the gen­eral population, it is important to recognize their limitations, namely, that most of these studies are observational and that there are no randomized- control trials that have looked at sim­ilar information. Additionally, it is possible and that these JW patients were not randomized that there were both conscious and subconscious modications of surgical technique know­ing that there are limitations for blood transfusion in the event of uncontrolled surgical bleeding.
15 When Blood Is Not anOption: Care oftheJehovah’s Witness Patient
https://t.me/medicina_free
139
Summary
With respect to our patient scheduled for cardiac surgery, there are many options for optimization despite the possi­bility of a high blood-loss surgery. While the surgery is not elective, it is also not emergent such that there is adequate time for optimization. Presurgical consultation with an anesthesiologist is imperative and crucial for minimizing perioperative morbidity. Patients who are dialysis-depen­dent are often chronically anemic due to impaired erythro­poietin production in interstitial cells found in the renal cortex. Other etiologies of anemia in patients with end­stage renal disease include uremic-induced inhibitors of red blood cell production and nutritional deciencies (iron, folate, vitamin B12). Improvement in anemia for this patient can be accomplished by targeting each of the previ­ously mentioned causes of anemia—use of erythropoiesis­stimulating agents (ESA- examples including Aranesp™, Epogen™), strict dialysis and use of desmopressin to address uremic platelet dysfunction, and importantly intra­venous iron, folate, and vitamin B12 to address possible nutritional deciencies. Intraoperatively, strategies to mini­mize blood loss include ANH, cell saver, and the use of permissible “minor blood products,” if indicated. Postoperative strategies involve minimization of blood draws, use of vasopressors if indicated, and continued treat­ment of postoperative anemia.
Blood management in the Jehovah’s Witness patient poses particular challenges for the anesthesiologist most notably their refusal of certain blood products due to reli­gious beliefs. Patients having surgeries in which there is a high likelihood of moderate blood loss should be evaluated as soon as possible to assess for the presence and treatment of preoperative anemia but also to set out expectations for both the patient and the physician. There are many tools in our arsenal to deal with this challenging clinical scenario in high-risk, high blood-loss surgeries within the connes of honoring a patient’s religious beliefs; with the knowl­edge of available institutional resources along with a clear understanding of the patient’s specic wishes, it is possi­ble to have good surgical outcomes while avoiding transfusions.
References
1. Resar LMS, Frank SM.Bloodless medicine: what to do when
you can’t transfuse. ASH Educ Program Book. 2014;2014(1): 553–8.
2. Vincent J-L, etal. Efcacy of allogeneic red blood cell transfusions.
Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2007;21(2):209–19.
3. Siddon AJ, et al. Delayed haemolytic and serologic transfusion
reactions: pathophysiology, treatment and prevention. Curr Opin Hematol. 2018;25(6):459–67.
4. Busch MP, Kleinman SH, Nemo GJ.Current and emerging infec­tious risks of blood transfusions. JAMA. 2003;289(8):959–62.
5. Blajchman MA. Immunomodulation and blood transfusion. Am J Ther. 2002;9(5):389–95.
6. Bux J, Sachs UJH. The pathogenesis of transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI). Br J Haematol. 2007;136(6):788–99.
7. Gilliss BM, Looney MR, Gropper MA. Reducing noninfec­tious risks of blood transfusion. Anesth J Am Soc Anesth. 2011;115(3):635–49.
8. Crosby ET. Perioperative haemotherapy: I. indications for blood component transfusion. Can J Anaesth. 1992;39(7):695–707.
9. Yaddanapudi S, Yaddanapudi LN.Indications for blood and blood product transfusion. Indian J Anaesth. 2014;58(5):538.
10. Giangrande PLF.The history of blood transfusion. Br J Haematol. 2000;110(4):758–67.
11. Schoeld RE.The enlightened Joseph Priestley: a study of his life and work from 1773 to 1804. University Park, PA: Penn State Press; 2004.
12. Karamanou M, Tsoucalas G, Androutsos G.Hallmarks in the study of respiratory physiology and the crucial role of Antoine-Laurent de Lavoisier (1743–1794). Am J Phys Lung Cell Mol Phys. 2013;305(9):L591–4.
13. Blundell J.Experiments on the transfusion of blood by the syringe. Med Chir Trans. 1818;9(Pt 1):56.
14. Landsteiner K. Uber agglutinationserscheinungen normalen men­schlichen blutes. Wien Klin Wshr. 1901;14:1132–4.
15. Weil R. Sodium citrate in the transfusion of blood. J Am Med Assoc. 1915;64(5):425–6.
16. Rous P, Turner JR.The preservation of living red blood cells invitro: I.Methods of preservation. J Exp Med. 1916;23(2):219–37.
17. Strauss RG.Elmer L.DeGowin, MD: blood transfusions in war and peace. Transfus Med Rev. 2006;20(2):165–8.
18. Jorgenson TD, et al. When blood is not an option: the case for a standardized blood transfusion consent form. ASA Newsl. 2017;81(6):48–50.
19. Vincent JL, et al. Anemia and blood transfusion in critically ill patients. JAMA. 2002;288(12):1499–507.
20. Beliën J, Forcé H.Supply chain management of blood products: a literature review. Eur J Oper Res. 2012;217(1):1–16.
21. Suresh S.Mechanical response of human red blood cells in health and disease: some structure-property-function relationships. J Mater Res. 2006;21(8):1871–7.
22. Weiss HJ.Platelet physiology and abnormalities of platelet func­tion. N Engl J Med. 1975;293(11):531–41.
23. Dara SI, etal. Fresh frozen plasma transfusion in critically ill medical patients with coagulopathy. Crit Care Med. 2005;33(11):2667–71.
24. Khawar H, Kelley W, Guzman N.Fresh Frozen Plasma (FFP). Stat Pearls [Internet]. Treasure Island, FL: Stat Pearls Publishing; 2019.
25. Callum JL, Karkouti K, Lin Y.Cryoprecipitate: the current state of knowledge. Transfus Med Rev. 2009;23(3):177–88.
26. Knox Z. Writing witness history: the historiography of the Jehovah’s witnesses and the watch tower bible and tract Society of Pennsylvania. J Relig Hist. 2011;35(2):157–80.
27. The Holy Bible: New International Version. Zondervan; 1984.
28. Lawson T, Ralph C.Perioperative Jehovah’s witnesses: a review. Br J Anaes. 2015;115(5):676–87.
29. Remmers PA, Speer AJ.Clinical strategies in the medical care of Jehovah’s witnesses. Am J Med. 2006;119(12):1013–8.
30. Bryson GL, Laupacis A, Wells GA. Does acute normovolemic hemodilution reduce perioperative allogeneic transfusion? A meta­analysis. Anesth Analg. 1998;86(1):9–15.
31. Segal JB, etal. Preoperative acute normovolemic hemodilution: a meta-analysis. Transfusion. 2004;44(5):632–44.
32. Gupta A.Preoperative screening and risk assessment in the ambu­latory surgery patient. Curr Opin Anesthesiol. 2009;22(6):705–11.
140
https://t.me/medicina_free
J. B. Feit and S. Perelman
33. Wu W-C, et al. Preoperative hematocrit levels and postoperative outcomes in older patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. JAMA. 2007;297(22):2481–8.
34. SABM.Anemia prevention and management program implemen­tation guide. 2015.
35. Scharman CD, etal. Treatment of individuals who cannot receive blood products for religious or other reasons. Am J Hematol. 2017;92(12):1370–81.
36. Crookston KP. The approach to the patient who declines blood transfusion. In: Post TW, editors. UpToDate. Waltham: UpToDate Inc. https://uptodate.com. Accessed on 28 Mar 2019.
37. Eddy VA, Morris JA Jr, Cullinane DC.Hypothermia, coagulopathy, and acidosis. Surg Clin N Am. 2000;80(3):845–54.
38. Fischer DP, Zacharowski KD, Meybohm P.Savoring every drop– vampire or mosquito? Crit Care. 2014;18(3):306.
39. Koch CG, etal. Hospital-acquired anemia: prevalence, outcomes, and healthcare implications. J Hosp Med. 2013;8(9):506–12.
40. Fung YL, etal. To transfuse, or not to transfuse: that is the question. Crit Care Resusc. 2009;11(1):71.
41. Reyes G, etal. Bloodless cardiac surgery in Jehovah’s witnesses: outcomes compared with a control group. Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition). 2007;60(7):727–31.
42. Pattakos G, etal. Outcome of patients who refuse transfusion after cardiac surgery: a natural experiment with severe blood conserva­tion. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(15):1154–60.
Blood Substitutes andArtificial Oxygen
https://t.me/medicina_free
Carriers
JacobTiegs
16
History
Experiments using substances to deliver oxygen to tissues have been conducted since the seventeenth century [1]. Initially, hemoglobin solutions were injected into humans with very poor results. Morbidity likely arose from free hemoglobin particles and their negative effects on the GU system and kidneys in particular. A number of factors con­tributed to a rebirth in interest for articial oxygen carriers including increased warfare during the twentieth century and the identication of blood-born infectious diseases. As blood transfusion became safer and methods for decreasing the risk of transfusion-related infections developed, the impetus for breakthroughs in blood substitutes may have waned. However, soon a number of companies had promising prod­ucts that were in the later phases of clinical trials. Unfortunately, these trials soon ended due to concerns over ability to get regulatory approval while funding became scarce [2]. Despite this, the need for blood substitutes and articial oxygen carriers still exists, and some products con­tinue to be in development.
Ideal Characteristics ofOxygen Carriers
There are a number of characteristics that would be part of an ideal articial oxygen carrier. First, it would be readily avail­able and able to be mass produced. It would also need to be safe. This would mean minimal side effects, ability to inter­act in a non-detrimental way with nitric oxide, and it would be sterile. The substance would ideally be portable and easily stored while having a long or manageable shelf life. The
J. Tiegs (*) NYU Langone Medical Center, Department of Anesthesiology, New York, NY, USA e-mail: Jacob.tiegs@nyulangone.org
compound would be able to be given universally to all patients and be cost effective. This list may seem unattain­able and lengthy; however, there are at least two compounds currently that satisfy most of these requirements.
Current Types ofOxygen Carriers
To date, there are two main categories of oxygen carriers. Hemoglobin-based oxygen carriers, or HBOCs, are derived from bovine or human blood. First, hemoglobin is separated from the red cell structure by ultraltration and purication [3]. A number of processes exist to then stabilize the hemo­globin compound and prepare it for use. These include cross­linking, pyridoxylation, polymerization, or pegylation. These processes prevent the dissociation of hemoglobin’s four chain conguration into its basic alpha and beta dimers [4]. Unfortunately, preparations have been limited by side effects. Early formulations caused nephrotoxicity thought to be secondary to red cell stromal fragments in the hemoglo­bin. Encapsulated HBOCs were attempted but ran into prob­lems with the host-defense systems (reticuloendothelial system) [5]. Most recently, hypoxic vasodilation that nor­mally occurs in hypoxic states has been theorized to be lim­ited by HBOCs due to the deactivation of this reex by the scavenging of nitric oxide by the HBOC compounds causing problematic vasoconstriction. Because of these drawbacks, there is not currently a HBOC that can replace our current standard of care using transfusion of red blood cells. However, each trial has given us new information to use and incorporate into the next possible product. There is still hope and products in the pipeline (Table16.1).
Peruorocarbons, or PFCs, are chemically inert com­pounds where uorine replaces hydrogen atoms. They are water insoluble which requires a lipid emulsication system to be utilized. PFCs act as solvents for oxygen, and unlike the coupling reaction and relationship of hemoglobin, the amount of oxygen that can be dissolved follows a linear
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021 C. S. Scher et al. (eds.), Essentials of Blood Product Management in Anesthesia Practice,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59295-0_16
141
142
J. Tiegs
https://t.me/medicina_free
Table 16.1 Examples of HBOCs
Name Description Diaspirin crosslinked Hb,
HemAssist Hemopure (HBOC-201) Polymerized bovine Hb PolyHeme Pyridoxylated polymerized Hb from
MP4OX PEG-conjugated human Hb rHb1.1, rHb2.0 Recombinant human Hb (from E.coli) Sanguinate PEG carboxylated bovine Hb
Chemically cross-linked Hb alpha chains
outdated human blood
progression and obeys Henry’s law and is related directly with PO2 [6]. However, PFCs have fairly short half-lives (2–4h), and the necessary emulsion limits how quickly the compound can be administered. A number of side effects were seen in early clinical trials with PFCs, but the etiology of the problems is unclear. A u-like illness was often seen after administration as well as thrombocytopenia, which likely occurred due to the emulsion’s effects on the platelets’ surface [6]. Initially, one PFC was approved for use in isch­emic tissue situations (Fluosol); however, it was later pulled due to lack of protability [7]. Currently, there does not appear to be many trials in the pipeline for PFCs.
Most Benecial Uses forOxygen Carriers Currently
There are currently no oxygen carriers approved by the FDA for use in the USARight now, the only way to obtain one is through the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Expanded Access Protocol. Specically, the use of the unli­censed OC HBOC-201 (Hemopure) may be approved for life-threatening anemia in patient populations where allo­genic red blood cell transfusion is not an option [8]. Of note, Hemopure is currently used in Russia and South Africa [9].
act with and inactivate endothelial nitric oxide, which is a potent vasodilator [10].
Other effects on the cardiovascular system have also been seen. One of these effects is an increase in myocardial infarc­tions in patients receiving HBOCs. Obviously, this is a wor­risome complication, but the etiology is not fully known. It does not appear that the scavenging of nitric oxide com­pounds is fully responsible for this phenomenon. In fact, in studies where HBOCs were infused directly into coronary arteries, no increase in vasoconstriction was seen [11].
Changes in coagulation and concern for coagulopathy also have surrounded the use of HBOCs. Possible etiologies for coagulopathy include dilutional coagulopathy and hypo­calcemia, oxidation of the compound to methemoglobin and subsequently inhibiting platelet aggregation, large molecular weight molecules (HBOCs) complexing with von Willebrand factor and speeding its elimination, and lastly nitric oxide scavenging as mentioned previously [12].
One side effect that has been seen in early trials that may be improved or eliminated in more recent trials is nephrotox­icity. Stroma-free hemoglobin caused excess glomerular l­tration of hemoglobin dimers, resulting in acute tubular necrosis and oliguria.
In addition to the above concerns, HBOCs and free hemoglo­bin have been implicated in a multitude of other possible compli­cations: interference of macrophage function, GI distress, iron deposition, neurotoxicity, antigenicity, and alterations on a num­ber of clinical laboratory tests (bilirubin, creatinine kinase, mag­nesium, uric acid, and gamma- glutamyltransferase) [13].
The main side effects of PFCs were u-like reactions and symptoms likely secondary to the cytokine-mediated effects of the compounds and platelet sequestration in the spleen and liver [3].
Outlook andFuture Development
Side Eects andChallenges ofOxygen Carriers
The issues surrounding HBOCs have led to most trials being discontinued and preventing further studies from taking off. Some of the side effects were mentioned earlier, but a number of different complications have been noted. One of the main and most seen effects of HBOCs given at therapeutic doses is systemic hypertension. Blood pressure seems to increase without a corresponding increase in car­diac output. This hypertension also occurs in the pulmo­nary vasculature. So, in sum, increases are seen in SVR, PVR, MAP, and pulmonary vasculature resistance index, and a concomitant decrease is seen in cardiac output. The most commonly accepted explanation is that HBOCs inter-
Unfortunately, no current oxygen carriers are FDA approved for use in the United States. Although there are some compa­nies pursuing this avenue for oxygen delivery, the side effects and inability for previous products to be proven safe and effective have limited further development. Further HBOC compounds will have to address the nitric oxide scavenging and molecular size and properties of the hemoglobin mole­cule. It is not currently known whether PFCs will have a role in the future blood substitute world.
One exciting and new possibility is the culturing of red blood cells invitro. Advances using hematopoietic progeni­tor cells from sources such as umbilical cord blood and stem cells make this theoretically possible. As does the prospect of creating immortalized adult erythroid progenitor cells. However, many roadblocks exist from the science and regu­latory aspects before this can become a real possibility [14].