Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5226_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
02.09.2026
Размер:
19 Мб
Скачать

Intravenous Antimicrobial Therapy

21
AmyV.Dora andMatthewBidwellGoetz
Abbreviations
ESBL Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases HIV Human immunodeciency virus IV Intravenous MRSA Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus MSSA Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus NGS Next-generation sequencing PO Per os
Key Points
• Recalcitrant chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a notoriously difcult-to-treat
inammatory disease of noninfectious origin; most individuals with this disease have had persistent or relapsing symptoms despite surgical and medical thera­pies, typically inclusive of prior antibiotic therapy.
• Colonization of the sinuses, in addition to host risk factors such as immune com-
promise, anatomic disruption, and environmental exposures, causes patients with CRS to be susceptible to acute and potentially recurrent bacterial, fungal, and mycobacterial infections.
A. V. Dora Infectious Diseases, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA e-mail: amy.dora@va.gov
M. B. Goetz ( Infectious Diseases, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Clinical Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA e-mail: matthew.goetz@va.gov
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2025 J. T. Lee et al. (eds.), Advances in Surgical and Medical Interventions for Recalcitrant Chronic Rhinosinusitis,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-89191-5_21
*)
213
214
• CRS patients with severe infection may warrant systemic antibiotic therapy,
including intravenous, pathogen-directed therapy. However, stewardship regarding the use of systemic antimicrobials is necessary to prevent the emer­gence of resistance and the adverse effects of long-term intravenous antibiotic therapy.
A. V. Dora and M. B. Goetz

Background

Chronic rhinosinusitis is dened by symptoms of nasal discharge or obstruction for at least 12weeks, accompanied either by facial pain, facial pressure, or by hyposmia [13]. Diagnostic conrmation is provided by documentation of nasal polyps, mucopurulent discharge, edema, or mucosal changes within the osteomeatal com­plex or sinuses by endoscopy or computed tomography imaging.
The manifestations of chronic rhinosinusitis are due to inammation of the sinuses, which is often accompanied by chronic colonization and biolm forma­tion by a variety of bacteria and fungi not normally found in the sinuses (i.e., dysbiosis of the sinuses). Although uctuations in these microbial populations may cause symptom ares that merit antibiotic therapy, chronic rhinosinusitis per se is not mediated by infection and may not benet from chronic antibiotic ther­apy [35].
This chapter will discuss the diagnosis and management of those cases of serious infection which do warrant systemic antibiotic therapy, with particular attention to recalcitrant chronic rhinosinusitis, i.e., those cases of chronic rhinosinusitis that fail to respond to adequate surgery, intranasal corticosteroid treatment, and up to two short courses of antibiotics or systemic corticosteroids in the prior year; impor­tantly, this denition does not specify receipt of previous culture-directed therapy [1].

When Is Recalcitrant Chronic Rhinosinusitis Infectious?

When considering further antibiotic therapy for persons with recalcitrant chronic rhi­nosinusitis, it is important to consider the reasons for failure of prior antibiotic therapy and whether symptom ares are due to infectious or noninfectious causes. Failure of antimicrobial therapy in an infection may be due to (1) failure to identify the patho­genic organism, (2) pathogen resistance to antimicrobial therapy, (3) anatomic com­plications of infections (e.g., osteomyelitis), (4) inadequate source control, (5) suboptimal antimicrobial bioavailability or dosing, or (6) insufcient duration of therapy. Notably, despite microbial colonization of the sinuses, recalcitrant disease need not be due to infection, rendering any antimicrobial therapy ineffective in symp­tom abatement [5]. The overlap between chronic rhinosinusitis, chronic recalcitrant rhinosinusitis, and chronic infectious rhinosinusitis is shown in Fig.21.1.
21 Intravenous Antimicrobial Therapy
Fig. 21.1 Infectious rhinosinusitis and the overlap between chronic and recalcitrant disease. Chronic rhinosinusitis is described as the waxing and waning presence of symptoms; ongoing inadequate control of symptoms despite multimodal interventions (steroids, antibiotics, surgery) has led to the description of recalcitrant disease. Acute worsening of symptoms (described as ares) can result from either acute infection (infectious rhinosinusitis) or other noninfectious triggers
215
Before committing a patient with recalcitrant chronic rhinosinusitis to addi­tional antibiotic therapy, it is important to conrm the infectious etiology of a are by verifying the presence of both a compatible clinical syndrome and caus­ative pathogen. However, determining whether antibiotic therapy is warranted is often difcult. First, the symptoms of infectious chronic rhinosinusitis and non­infectious ares of chronic rhinosinusitis, e.g., rhinorrhea, mucopurulence, altered sense of smell, facial pain, and nasal obstruction, overlap. Additionally, identication of the responsible infectious pathogen(s) may be challenging due to the indistinct boundaries between colonization and infection and the presence of polymicrobial biolms [6] in the setting of dysbiosis of the sinuses [4, 5]. Both the clinical context and pathogen identication are essential for determin­ing if an organism is a true cause of infection or an innocent bystander. Although making a precise clinical and microbiological diagnosis is difcult, this is of great clinical importance, as unnecessary or prolonged antimicrobial therapy car­ries the risks of side effects and promotes colonization of the sinus by resistant pathogens.
If the patient is clinically stable, the differential diagnoses listed in Table21.1 should be evaluated prior to initiating antimicrobial therapy for infectious rhinosi­nusitis are. As this chapter will focus on the indications for usage of intravenous antibiotic therapy, we will not cover noninfectious causes for ares of chronic rhi­nosinusitis in depth.
216
A. V. Dora and M. B. Goetz
Table 21.1
Infectious differential of chronic rhinosinusitis ares
Viral rhinosinusitis – Coronaviruses including SARS-CoV-2RhinovirusInuenzaAdenovirusParainuenza Bacterial rhinosinusitis – Streptococcus pneumoniae – Oral Streptococcus spp. – Haemophilus inuenzaeMoraxella catarrhalisStaphylococcus aureusEnterobacteralesPseudomonas aeruginosaBurkholderia cepacia complex – Mixed aerobic and anaerobic infection Fungal rhinosinusitis – Invasive: Zygomycetes, Aspergillus, Fusarium – Allergic: Aspergillus, Alternaria Uncommon pathogens – Klebsiella ozaenae – Atypical mycobacteria
Chronic rhinosinusitis symptoms can represent a wide range of diagnostic possibilities. Although this list focuses on microbiological causes, it is important to also consider the noninfectious dif­ferential of these symptoms. This is inclusive of diagnoses such as nonallergic rhinitis, allergic rhinitis, allergic fungal rhinosinusitis, structural abnormalities (septal perforation, nasal valve dys­function, septal deviation, adenoidal hypertrophy), neuralgia, vascular etiology, trauma, neoplasm, congenital causes, and temporal arteritis [51]
Chronic rhinosinusitis symptoms and the infectious differential diagnosis
Predisposing Risk Factors inInfectious Chronic Rhinosinusitis
Chronic rhinosinusitis is characterized by disruption of epithelial barriers, dis­turbances in the normal sinus ora (dysbiosis), and chronic inammation, all of which increase the risk of acute infectious exacerbations [7]. Tissue disruption in the sinuses, incited by viral infections, atrophic rhinitis, and anatomic disruption (nasal cavity deformation, neoplasms, nasal polyposis, trauma, surgery) further increase susceptibility to biolm formation, uctuating polymicrobial coloniza­tion of the sinuses, and progression to complicated infection by organisms not typically seen in acute bacterial rhinosinusitis, especially in the setting of a recurrent course of antibiotic therapy [4]. A similar sequence of events occurs in patients with mechanical dysfunction of mucociliary clearance e.g., primary cili­ary dyskinesia and cystic brosis.
21 Intravenous Antimicrobial Therapy
Specic immunologic defects also predispose to recurrent infections. Patients with a primary immunodeciency, such as complement deciencies, immunoglobulin G deciency, immunoglobulin A deciency, or common variable immunodeciency (CVID), have a high risk of frequent, recurrent infections, including rhinosinusitis [8], with more severe disease presentations. More severe and/or unusual infections can also be seen in persons receiving immunosuppressant therapy, such as patients with organ transplantation, those on therapy with agents such as rituximab or chronic ste­roid therapy, or those with bone marrow suppression due to cytotoxic therapy for malignancies, poorly controlled diabetes, or advanced HIV infection.
Altogether, compromised host defenses, whether due to tissue disruption, immu­nologic factors, or impaired mucociliary clearance, increase the risk of recurrent infections, progression to complicated infection, and repeated antimicrobial therapy exposure, accompanied by sinus colonization with resistant organisms and subse­quent difcult-to-treat infections.
217
The Ecology andMicrobiology ofInfectious Chronic Rhinosinusitis
The organisms comprising the normal sinonasal microbiome are highly diverse. In comparison with chronic rhinosinusitis, there is replacement of this normal ora with a more restricted range of organisms. A growing body of evidence indicates that replacement of the normal diverse microbiome is both a conse­quence of chronic inammation and prior antibiotic use and a risk factor for recurrent disease ares [5, 9]. Although acute bacterial rhinosinusitis is typically caused by Streptococcus pneumonia, Haemophilus inuenzae, or Moraxella catarrhalis [9], the microbiology of chronic rhinosinusitis infection more often involves methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA and MRSA), gram-negative organisms including Pseudomonas aerugi- nosa, and anaerobes [4]. Anatomic disruption also affects the sinus ora, for example, exposure to bisphosphonate therapy can result in oroantral stula from osteonecrosis of the maxilla [10], with subsequent polymicrobial infection due to oral ora. A careful history of the insults and exposures to the sinonasal environ­ment can broaden the microbial differential for the infectious etiology of a rhino­sinusitis exacerbation.
Underlying chronic diseases also impact the microbial composition of the sinus ora. In cystic brosis, the upper airways can be colonized with MRSA, P. aerugi- nosa, or Burkholderia species, which can lead to infection [11]. Patients with poorly controlled diabetes, chronic steroid use, or malignancy not only have frequent, recurrent bacterial infections but are also at risk for more rare invasive fungal dis­eases of the sinuses, similar to patients with hematopoietic stem cell transplants [12]. A high index of suspicion for Mucorales infection is important, as it is
218
A. V. Dora and M. B. Goetz
extremely destructive and rapidly progressive, and aggressive treatment can be life­saving. Rarely, atypical mycobacteria [13, 14], Nocardia spp. [15], or even protozoa [16] can be the responsible pathogens and require specialized microbiological pro­cessing and cultures. Concern for infection by these pathogens should prompt con­sultation with infectious disease pharmacists to guide antibiotic selection, given the potential for breeding further resistance.
Finally, specic environmental exposures can increase the risk of more atypical infections. Both freshwater swimming and contaminated nasal irrigation can predis­pose individuals to amoebic disease, with a risk of developing amoebic meningoen­cephalitis [16]. Occupational exposures such as exposure to work in soil, hay, and freshwater sources can increase the risk of fungal rhinosinusitis with Scedosporium spp. [17] Additionally, substance use can provide an opportunity for organisms not intrinsic to the nasal passages to infect the sinuses, either by direct introduction or disruption of anatomy (e.g., smoking marijuana and Aspergillus sinus disease; cocaine resulting in septal perforation; tobacco resulting in increased inammation and risk for neoplasms).

Anatomically Complicated Infections

Inadequate source control can lead to ongoing infection, secondary complications, and antibiotic resistance. Identifying and controlling the source of infection is espe­cially important in complicated infections that originate outside the sinuses or extend from the sinuses into other tissues. For example, pathogen-directed therapy based on cultures from direct aspiration of the maxillary sinus may still result in treatment failure if an odontogenic infection, such as a periapical abscess with sinus extension, is not addressed with adequate drainage. Alternatively, infection can be complicated by bacteremia, extension from the sinuses into the orbits, abscess development, erosion into the bone (osteomyelitis), or extension into the brain, leading to meningitis, intracranial abscess, or cavernous sinus thrombosis. Diagnosis of these secondary complications requires a high level of clinical suspicion. Clinical symptoms and exam ndings should be reviewed for alarm signs (Table21.2), including headaches, loss of vision, and meningismus. Infectious disease consulta­tion is recommended to guide antimicrobial therapy in these populations.
Imaging is essential in dening the anatomic involvement of infection, guiding surgical intervention, and selecting antimicrobial therapy effective within the infected space. Comprehensive computed tomography including imaging of the brain in addition to the sinuses or orbits should be considered [18]. Contrast media may be helpful in evaluating for complications such as cavernous sinus thrombosis or abscess. Magnetic resonance imaging can be very useful in identifying complica­tions such as intracranial abscess, orbital complications, or invasive fungal sinusitis [18]. Further specialist consultation can be helpful in determining appropriate diag­nostics and therapeutics.
21 Intravenous Antimicrobial Therapy
219
Table 21.2
Alarm signs and symptoms Complications of rhinosinusitis Neurologic decits
Severe headache
Periorbital edema Diplopia/blindness
Neck pain/stiffness Bacterial meningitis
Nasal/palatal eschar Mucormycosis
qSOFA – Fever >38.0°C or hypothermia <36.0°C – Tachycardia >90 beats/min – Tachypnea >20 breaths/min – Leukocytosis >12×109/l or leukopenia
– Altered mentation Hypotension
End-organ system dysfunction
Alarm signs or the documented presence of a complication from infectious rhinosinusitis should prompt an infectious disease consultation to assist with treatment
a
SIRS: systemic inammatory response syndrome
b
qSOFA: quick sequential organ failure assessment
Alarm symptoms in chronic rhinosinusitis and associated infectious complications
Intracranial abscess Bacterial meningitis/encephalitis Superior sagittal and cavernous sinus thrombosis Subperiosteal abscess Epidural empyema Subdural empyema
Pre-septal cellulitis Orbital cellulitis Orbital abscess
Lemierre’s syndrome (septic thrombophlebitis)
a
or SIRSb criteria:
9
<4×10
/l
Necrosis Two or more signs indicate the presence of
sepsis, complicating one of the above infections (e.g., sepsis)
Septic shock Toxic shock syndrome (group A Streptococcus infection)
Identifying thePathogen andSusceptibility
Pathogen identication and susceptibility testing are necessary to guide antibiotic treatment especially in the context of prior antibiotic therapy. Direct sampling for culture from the sites of infection provides the most relevant information. Supercial cultures of the nasal passages are not recommended, as they recover clinically irrel­evant contaminants or commensal organisms; at a minimum, either endoscopic cul­tures of the middle meatus or direct aspiration of the sinuses via antral puncture should be obtained [19]. If there is concern for secondary complications, such as an abscess or osteomyelitis, attempts should be made to obtain cultures from these sources, e.g., cultures of abscess contents or bone biopsy to obtain bone cultures, if safe and feasible.
Obtaining multiple cultures allows for adequate material to be sent for special­ized aerobic, anaerobic, fungal, mycobacterial, or nocardial cultures. Specics on
220
A. V. Dora and M. B. Goetz
optimal specimen, method of collection, and specimen transport details are enumer­ated in the Guide to Utilization of the Microbiology Laboratory for Diagnosis of Infectious Diseases: 2018 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the American Society for Microbiology [19]. Although fresh tissue or uid is necessary for culturing organisms for denitive identication and susceptibility testing, histologic examination of formalin-xed tissues using specialized stains (e.g., Grocott’s Methenamine Silver stain for fungi) can still aid in diagnosis [20].
Traditional cultures may demonstrate aerobic and anaerobic bacterial organism growth in days, whereas fungi and mycobacteria may require weeks of incubation for growth [21, 22]. If tissue availability is limited, both specialist consultation with infectious disease and the microbiology laboratory can help prioritize testing based on clinical likelihood. Apart from traditional culture media, rapid and advanced diagnostics have greatly assisted the identication and susceptibility testing of pathogens; many of these tests are now widely available. If no organism is identied by such means, frozen tissue can be sent to specialized referral laboratories for next­generation sequencing (NGS), wherein genetic material from the sample is ampli­ed and sequenced to determine pathogen identication, virulence markers, and genes conferring antimicrobial resistance [23].
The identication of the pathogen responsible for a are of recalcitrant rhinosi­nusitis is often challenging even when appropriate cultures are obtained. Not only are there issues related to potential sampling error, but also recalcitrant chronic rhinosinusitis is characterized by chronic dysbiosis, wherein the sinus ora has been shaped by prior antimicrobial therapy and polymicrobial biolm formation [4]. Dysbiosis complicates the assessment of the contribution of any single organism to infectious syndromes, as the presence of symptoms may be due to the synergistic effects of multiple organisms and as symptomatic ares may reect uctuations in the relative density of organisms and associated inammation [7, 24]. As is the case with other polymicrobial infections (e.g., aspiration pneumonia, intra-abdominal foot infections, bacterial vaginosis), therapeutic success does not necessarily require treatment of all identied microorganisms.
The Role ofIntravenous Antimicrobial Therapy
There are no specic infectious disease guidelines for the use of empiric intrave­nous antimicrobial therapy in chronic rhinosinusitis. There is a dearth of high­quality studies examining the utility of intravenous antibiotics for chronic rhinosinusitis [5]; the literature is limited to small uncontrolled cohort studies with variable short-term success and high relapse rates [2527]. A Cochrane review pub­lished in 2016 was not able to identify any randomized controlled trials of intrave­nous antibiotic therapy [28]. Reviews of the available cohort studies have concluded that in light of the reported complications of intravenous antibiotics agents for chronic rhinosinusitis, such as deep vein thrombosis, drug reactions, and other adverse effects [29], intravenous antibiotics should not be routinely used in chronic rhinosinusitis, with exceptions for acute infectious complications, such as
21 Intravenous Antimicrobial Therapy
221
intracranial or intra-orbital infections [25, 30]. As discussed earlier in Fig.21.1, intravenous antibiotics are only benecial in patients with rhinosinusitis ares that are caused by infection, and the risk-benet prole of intravenous therapy supports its use only in documented, complicated, or invasive infections, where adequate tis­sue concentrations of effective antibiotics cannot be achieved by oral administration.
When toStart Empiric Intravenous Antimicrobial Therapy
Due to the variability of host factors and presentation of disease, our belief is that the best approach in treatment includes careful identication of anatomic involve­ment and causative organism by obtaining the results of cultures prior to initiating therapy. If the patient with suspected infection is clinically stable, it is appropriate to defer antimicrobial treatment and to expedite obtaining cultures for true culture­directed therapy.
The severity of illness; the likelihood of infectious complications, e.g., intracra­nial infection; and the presence of impaired host defenses that may predispose patients to rapid clinical progression should be the main considerations in deciding when and whether to start empiric antimicrobial therapy in chronic rhinosinusitis. Empiric antibiotic therapy is necessary in patients who have severe presentations (i.e., symptoms noted in Table21.2) or life-threatening or complicated infections, such as meningoencephalitis, orbital involvement, epidural or subdural empyema, brain abscess, or bacteremia. Notably, individuals meeting at least two of the sys­temic inammatory reaction syndrome criteria (fever >38.0 °C or hypothermia <36.0°C, tachycardia >90 beats/minute, tachypnea >20 breaths/minute, leukocyto­sis >12×109/l, or leukopenia <4×109/l) may have developed sepsis, complicating one of the above infections [31]. When accompanied by hypotension or end-organ system dysfunction, these ndings indicate the presence of septic shock and should prompt urgent initiation of antibiotics; consultation with infectious disease is highly recommended. Host risk factors may lower the threshold for treatment given the potential risk for complications. Special populations such as those with cystic bro­sis, those with primary ciliary dyskinesia, and those who are profoundly immuno­suppressed (e.g., organ transplantation, poorly controlled diabetes, and primary immunodeciency) have an increased risk for severe, extensive infection with risk for progression with secondary complications and catastrophic consequences including hospitalization, transplant organ loss, or death. The prevention of these outcomes is essential.
If sepsis is present or the infection is complicated, e.g., osteomyelitis of sur­rounding bone or concern for necrosis and decreased blood supply, preference should be given to initiating intravenous antimicrobial therapy to ensure rapid anti­microbial activity and adequate concentrations of effective antibiotics at the site of infection. When considering severe complications of infectious rhinosinusitis such as intraocular infection or intracranial penetration, infectious disease specialist involvement is recommended.
222
A. V. Dora and M. B. Goetz
Prior to starting empiric intravenous therapy, it is essential to draw two sets of blood cultures; sinus cultures should be obtained as soon as possible. The use of intravenous antibiotics with activity against gram-positive (Staphylococcus spp. and Streptococcus spp.) and gram-negative (Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa) bacte- ria is often appropriate, given the risk of resistant organisms due to the frequent prior use of antibiotics in this patient population; however, the risk of emerging antimicrobial resistance must be weighed, as there may be few options to treat a future infection with a highly resistant organism.
By denition, patients with recalcitrant disease have been exposed to prior anti­microbial therapy. Consequently, presentation of an acute infectious are inevitably leads to concern about infection by organisms resistant to narrow-spectrum antibi­otics. However, consideration needs to be given to the particulars of the patient. The best predictor of infection by resistant organisms is prior infection or colonization by that organism [32]. Other considerations include repeated exposures to specic antibiotics. Examples include the selection of uoroquinolone-resistant ora (and, for complex reasons, MRSA) due to prior uoroquinolone exposure [33] and the selection of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing organisms, such as Klebsiella or E. coli, by frequent use of penicillins and cephalosporins, which then require therapy with a carbapenem [34]. In addition to antimicrobial suscepti­bilities on the individual level, community-level susceptibilities and nosocomial exposures should be considered when choosing empiric treatment. Local hospital antibiograms that report the prevalence of resistant organisms in various settings (inpatient versus outpatient clinics) can guide empiric antibiotic selection.
Finally, the severity of infection does not correlate with antimicrobial resistance. Pathogens such as fully susceptible Staphylococcus spp. and Streptococcus spp. can cause life-threatening infections in persons with normal host defenses and even more so in select populations, such as patients with primary immunodeciencies, including complement deciencies, immunoglobulin G deciency, immunoglobu­lin A deciency, or common variable immunodeciency (CVID), or those with poorly controlled HIV infection. Options for empiric intravenous antimicrobial therapy for adequate coverage are provided in Table21.3.
Table 21.3 Empiric intravenous and oral antimicrobial therapy
Suspected pathogens MRSA Vancomycin 15mg/kg IV
MSSA Oxacillin 2g IV q6h
Intravenous therapy
loading dose* Daptomycin 8mg/kg IV q24h Linezolid 600mg IV q12h Ceftaroline 600mg IV q12h*
Cefazolin 1g IV q8h* Also covered by MRSA agents
Oral therapy Doxycycline 100mg PO q12h
Minocycline 100mg PO q12h Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole 160mg/800mg PO q12h* Linezolid 600mg PO q12h
Cefadroxil 500g PO q12h Cephalexin 500mg PO q6h Amoxicillin/clavulanate * 875mg/125mg PO q12h Also covered by MRSA agents
(continued)