Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5226_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Preface
- •Contents
- •Contributors
- •Extrinsic Factors
- •Intrinsic Factors
- •References
- •Indications
- •Surgical Technique
- •References
- •Background
- •Preoperative Considerations
- •Other Operative Points
- •Surgical Indications
- •Surgical Technique (Video 3.1)
- •Reported Outcomes
- •Potential Complications
- •References
- •4: Endoscopic Denker’s Approach
- •Background
- •Surgical Technique
- •Reported Outcomes
- •References
- •Background
- •Reported Outcomes
- •References
- •Background
- •Surgical Indications
- •Surgical Technique
- •Reported Outcomes
- •References
- •Background
- •Technical Factors
- •Patient Factors
- •Anatomic Factors
- •Imaging Review
- •Surgical Technique
- •Draf IIA
- •Draf IIB (Video 7.2)
- •References
- •Background
- •Surgical Techniques
- •Standard Frontal Sinus Approaches
- •Modified Hemi-Lothrop Procedure (Eloy IIC)
- •Modified Mini-Lothrop Procedure (Eloy IID)
- •Modified Subtotal-Lothrop Procedure (Eloy IIE)
- •Modified Central-Lothrop Procedure (Eloy IIF)
- •References
- •Background
- •Surgical Techniques
- •Modifications
- •Reported Outcomes
- •References
- •Background
- •Surgical Technique
- •References
- •11: The Outside-in Draf III Procedure
- •Background
- •Surgical Technique
- •Surgical Steps
- •Post-Operative Management
- •Reported Outcomes
- •Patient Reporting Outcome Measures
- •Operative Time
- •Complications
- •References
- •12: Balloon Sinuplasty
- •Background
- •Reported Outcomes
- •Surgical Technique
- •Local Anesthesia Protocol
- •Procedure: Maxillary Sinus Balloon Dilation
- •Procedure: Frontal Sinus Balloon Dilation
- •Procedure: Sphenoid Sinus Balloon Dilation
- •References
- •Background
- •Surgical Technique
- •Nasal Polypectomy
- •Maxillary Sinus Disease
- •Ethmoid Sinus Disease
- •Frontal Sinus Disease
- •Sphenoid Sinus Disease
- •Mucocele Drainage
- •Balloon Sinus Dilation
- •Outcomes
- •References
- •Background
- •Patient Selection
- •Room Setup/Equipment
- •Navigation Systems
- •Monitoring
- •Patient Comfort
- •Staff Training
- •Reported Outcomes/Evolving Practice Patterns
- •References
- •16: Steroid Eluting-Implants
- •Background
- •Indications
- •Background
- •Surgical Technique (Video 15.1)
- •In-Office Polypectomy
- •Reported Outcomes
- •References
- •Surgical Technique
- •Reported Outcomes
- •References
- •Background
- •Cryotherapy
- •Radiofrequency Ablation
- •Surgical Technique
- •Reported Outcomes
- •References
- •18: Inferior Turbinate Reduction
- •Background
- •Extramucosal Surgical Techniques
- •Complete Turbinectomy
- •Laser Cautery
- •Electrocautery
- •Cryotherapy
- •Turbinate Lateralization
- •Submucosal Techniques
- •Microdebrider Turbinoplasty (Video 18.1)
- •Coblation (Video 18.2)
- •Radiofrequency Ablation (Video 18.3)
- •Ultrasound Turbinoplasty
- •References
- •Background
- •Surgical Technique
- •Bioabsorbable Nasal Sidewall Implant (LATERA)
- •Patient Selection
- •Local Anesthesia
- •Surgical Technique
- •Patient Selection
- •Local Anesthesia
- •Surgical Technique
- •References
- •Background
- •Topical Antibacterial Therapy
- •Topical Antifungal Therapy
- •Senior Author’s Practice
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •21: Intravenous Antimicrobial Therapy
- •Background
- •When Is Recalcitrant Chronic Rhinosinusitis Infectious?
- •Anatomically Complicated Infections
- •Empiric Oral Antimicrobial Therapy
- •Oral Versus Intravenous Therapy
- •Staphylococcus
- •Streptococcus
- •Enterococcus
- •Enterobacterales
- •Pseudomonas
- •Other Gram-Negative Organisms
- •Anaerobes
- •Multidrug-Resistant Organisms
- •Antimicrobial Stewardship
- •References
- •Background
- •Chronic Rhinosinusitis
- •Glucocorticoids
- •Intranasal Steroid Irrigations
- •Rationale
- •Evidence
- •The Exhalation Delivery System
- •Rationale
- •Evidence
- •Steroid-Eluting Sinus Stents
- •Rationale
- •Rationale
- •Glucocorticoid Insensitivity
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Background
- •Pathophysiology
- •Diagnosis
- •Aspirin Challenge
- •Aspirin Challenge Procedure
- •Aspirin Desensitization
- •Preparation
- •Logistics
- •Monitoring
- •Protocols
- •Aspirin-Induced Reactions
- •Maintenance Aspirin Therapy after Desensitization
- •Silent Desensitization
- •References
- •Background
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Background
- •Patient Selection
- •Dupilumab
- •Omalizumab
- •Mepolizumab
- •Summary
- •References
- •Background
- •Povidone-Iodine (PVP-I) Rinses
- •Manuka Honey Rinses
- •Colloidal Silver
- •Topical Antibiotics
- •Photodynamic Therapy
- •Phage Therapy
- •Sinonasal Microbiota Transfer (SNMT)
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Index

Intravenous Antimicrobial Therapy
21
AmyV.Dora andMatthewBidwellGoetz
Abbreviations
ESBL Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases
HIV Human immunodeciency virus
IV Intravenous
MRSA Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
MSSA Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus
NGS Next-generation sequencing
PO Per os
Key Points
• Recalcitrant chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a notoriously difcult-to-treat
inammatory disease of noninfectious origin; most individuals with this disease
have had persistent or relapsing symptoms despite surgical and medical therapies, typically inclusive of prior antibiotic therapy.
• Colonization of the sinuses, in addition to host risk factors such as immune com-
promise, anatomic disruption, and environmental exposures, causes patients with
CRS to be susceptible to acute and potentially recurrent bacterial, fungal, and
mycobacterial infections.
A. V. Dora
Infectious Diseases, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
e-mail: amy.dora@va.gov
M. B. Goetz (
Infectious Diseases, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Clinical Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
e-mail: matthew.goetz@va.gov
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature
Switzerland AG 2025
J. T. Lee et al. (eds.), Advances in Surgical and Medical Interventions for
Recalcitrant Chronic Rhinosinusitis,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-89191-5_21
*)
213

214
• CRS patients with severe infection may warrant systemic antibiotic therapy,
including intravenous, pathogen-directed therapy. However, stewardship
regarding the use of systemic antimicrobials is necessary to prevent the emergence of resistance and the adverse effects of long-term intravenous antibiotic
therapy.
A. V. Dora and M. B. Goetz
Background
Chronic rhinosinusitis is dened by symptoms of nasal discharge or obstruction for
at least 12weeks, accompanied either by facial pain, facial pressure, or by hyposmia
[1–3]. Diagnostic conrmation is provided by documentation of nasal polyps,
mucopurulent discharge, edema, or mucosal changes within the osteomeatal complex or sinuses by endoscopy or computed tomography imaging.
The manifestations of chronic rhinosinusitis are due to inammation of the
sinuses, which is often accompanied by chronic colonization and biolm formation by a variety of bacteria and fungi not normally found in the sinuses (i.e.,
dysbiosis of the sinuses). Although uctuations in these microbial populations
may cause symptom ares that merit antibiotic therapy, chronic rhinosinusitis per
se is not mediated by infection and may not benet from chronic antibiotic therapy [3–5].
This chapter will discuss the diagnosis and management of those cases of serious
infection which do warrant systemic antibiotic therapy, with particular attention to
recalcitrant chronic rhinosinusitis, i.e., those cases of chronic rhinosinusitis that fail
to respond to adequate surgery, intranasal corticosteroid treatment, and up to two
short courses of antibiotics or systemic corticosteroids in the prior year; importantly, this denition does not specify receipt of previous culture-directed therapy [1].
When Is Recalcitrant Chronic Rhinosinusitis Infectious?
When considering further antibiotic therapy for persons with recalcitrant chronic rhinosinusitis, it is important to consider the reasons for failure of prior antibiotic therapy
and whether symptom ares are due to infectious or noninfectious causes. Failure of
antimicrobial therapy in an infection may be due to (1) failure to identify the pathogenic organism, (2) pathogen resistance to antimicrobial therapy, (3) anatomic complications of infections (e.g., osteomyelitis), (4) inadequate source control, (5)
suboptimal antimicrobial bioavailability or dosing, or (6) insufcient duration of
therapy. Notably, despite microbial colonization of the sinuses, recalcitrant disease
need not be due to infection, rendering any antimicrobial therapy ineffective in symptom abatement [5]. The overlap between chronic rhinosinusitis, chronic recalcitrant
rhinosinusitis, and chronic infectious rhinosinusitis is shown in Fig.21.1.

21 Intravenous Antimicrobial Therapy
Fig. 21.1 Infectious
rhinosinusitis and the
overlap between chronic
and recalcitrant disease.
Chronic rhinosinusitis is
described as the waxing and
waning presence of
symptoms; ongoing
inadequate control of
symptoms despite
multimodal interventions
(steroids, antibiotics,
surgery) has led to the
description of recalcitrant
disease. Acute worsening of
symptoms (described as
ares) can result from either
acute infection (infectious
rhinosinusitis) or other
noninfectious triggers
215
Before committing a patient with recalcitrant chronic rhinosinusitis to additional antibiotic therapy, it is important to conrm the infectious etiology of a
are by verifying the presence of both a compatible clinical syndrome and causative pathogen. However, determining whether antibiotic therapy is warranted is
often difcult. First, the symptoms of infectious chronic rhinosinusitis and noninfectious ares of chronic rhinosinusitis, e.g., rhinorrhea, mucopurulence,
altered sense of smell, facial pain, and nasal obstruction, overlap. Additionally,
identication of the responsible infectious pathogen(s) may be challenging due
to the indistinct boundaries between colonization and infection and the presence
of polymicrobial biolms [6] in the setting of dysbiosis of the sinuses [4, 5].
Both the clinical context and pathogen identication are essential for determining if an organism is a true cause of infection or an innocent bystander. Although
making a precise clinical and microbiological diagnosis is difcult, this is of
great clinical importance, as unnecessary or prolonged antimicrobial therapy carries the risks of side effects and promotes colonization of the sinus by resistant
pathogens.
If the patient is clinically stable, the differential diagnoses listed in Table21.1
should be evaluated prior to initiating antimicrobial therapy for infectious rhinosinusitis are. As this chapter will focus on the indications for usage of intravenous
antibiotic therapy, we will not cover noninfectious causes for ares of chronic rhinosinusitis in depth.

216
A. V. Dora and M. B. Goetz
Table 21.1
Infectious differential of chronic rhinosinusitis ares
Viral rhinosinusitis
– Coronaviruses including SARS-CoV-2
– Rhinovirus
– Inuenza
– Adenovirus
– Parainuenza
Bacterial rhinosinusitis
– Streptococcus pneumoniae
– Oral Streptococcus spp.
– Haemophilus inuenzae
– Moraxella catarrhalis
– Staphylococcus aureus
– Enterobacterales
– Pseudomonas aeruginosa
– Burkholderia cepacia complex
– Mixed aerobic and anaerobic infection
Fungal rhinosinusitis
– Invasive: Zygomycetes, Aspergillus, Fusarium
– Allergic: Aspergillus, Alternaria
Uncommon pathogens
– Klebsiella ozaenae
– Atypical mycobacteria
Chronic rhinosinusitis symptoms can represent a wide range of diagnostic possibilities. Although
this list focuses on microbiological causes, it is important to also consider the noninfectious differential of these symptoms. This is inclusive of diagnoses such as nonallergic rhinitis, allergic
rhinitis, allergic fungal rhinosinusitis, structural abnormalities (septal perforation, nasal valve dysfunction, septal deviation, adenoidal hypertrophy), neuralgia, vascular etiology, trauma, neoplasm,
congenital causes, and temporal arteritis [51]
Chronic rhinosinusitis symptoms and the infectious differential diagnosis
Predisposing Risk Factors inInfectious Chronic Rhinosinusitis
Chronic rhinosinusitis is characterized by disruption of epithelial barriers, disturbances in the normal sinus ora (dysbiosis), and chronic inammation, all of
which increase the risk of acute infectious exacerbations [7]. Tissue disruption in
the sinuses, incited by viral infections, atrophic rhinitis, and anatomic disruption
(nasal cavity deformation, neoplasms, nasal polyposis, trauma, surgery) further
increase susceptibility to biolm formation, uctuating polymicrobial colonization of the sinuses, and progression to complicated infection by organisms not
typically seen in acute bacterial rhinosinusitis, especially in the setting of a
recurrent course of antibiotic therapy [4]. A similar sequence of events occurs in
patients with mechanical dysfunction of mucociliary clearance e.g., primary ciliary dyskinesia and cystic brosis.

21 Intravenous Antimicrobial Therapy
Specic immunologic defects also predispose to recurrent infections. Patients with
a primary immunodeciency, such as complement deciencies, immunoglobulin G
deciency, immunoglobulin A deciency, or common variable immunodeciency
(CVID), have a high risk of frequent, recurrent infections, including rhinosinusitis [8],
with more severe disease presentations. More severe and/or unusual infections can
also be seen in persons receiving immunosuppressant therapy, such as patients with
organ transplantation, those on therapy with agents such as rituximab or chronic steroid therapy, or those with bone marrow suppression due to cytotoxic therapy for
malignancies, poorly controlled diabetes, or advanced HIV infection.
Altogether, compromised host defenses, whether due to tissue disruption, immunologic factors, or impaired mucociliary clearance, increase the risk of recurrent
infections, progression to complicated infection, and repeated antimicrobial therapy
exposure, accompanied by sinus colonization with resistant organisms and subsequent difcult-to-treat infections.
217
The Ecology andMicrobiology ofInfectious
Chronic Rhinosinusitis
The organisms comprising the normal sinonasal microbiome are highly diverse.
In comparison with chronic rhinosinusitis, there is replacement of this normal
ora with a more restricted range of organisms. A growing body of evidence
indicates that replacement of the normal diverse microbiome is both a consequence of chronic inammation and prior antibiotic use and a risk factor for
recurrent disease ares [5, 9]. Although acute bacterial rhinosinusitis is typically
caused by Streptococcus pneumonia, Haemophilus inuenzae, or Moraxella
catarrhalis [9], the microbiology of chronic rhinosinusitis infection more often
involves methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
(MSSA and MRSA), gram-negative organisms including Pseudomonas aerugi-
nosa, and anaerobes [4]. Anatomic disruption also affects the sinus ora, for
example, exposure to bisphosphonate therapy can result in oroantral stula from
osteonecrosis of the maxilla [10], with subsequent polymicrobial infection due to
oral ora. A careful history of the insults and exposures to the sinonasal environment can broaden the microbial differential for the infectious etiology of a rhinosinusitis exacerbation.
Underlying chronic diseases also impact the microbial composition of the sinus
ora. In cystic brosis, the upper airways can be colonized with MRSA, P. aerugi-
nosa, or Burkholderia species, which can lead to infection [11]. Patients with poorly
controlled diabetes, chronic steroid use, or malignancy not only have frequent,
recurrent bacterial infections but are also at risk for more rare invasive fungal diseases of the sinuses, similar to patients with hematopoietic stem cell transplants
[12]. A high index of suspicion for Mucorales infection is important, as it is

218
A. V. Dora and M. B. Goetz
extremely destructive and rapidly progressive, and aggressive treatment can be lifesaving. Rarely, atypical mycobacteria [13, 14], Nocardia spp. [15], or even protozoa
[16] can be the responsible pathogens and require specialized microbiological processing and cultures. Concern for infection by these pathogens should prompt consultation with infectious disease pharmacists to guide antibiotic selection, given the
potential for breeding further resistance.
Finally, specic environmental exposures can increase the risk of more atypical
infections. Both freshwater swimming and contaminated nasal irrigation can predispose individuals to amoebic disease, with a risk of developing amoebic meningoencephalitis [16]. Occupational exposures such as exposure to work in soil, hay, and
freshwater sources can increase the risk of fungal rhinosinusitis with Scedosporium
spp. [17] Additionally, substance use can provide an opportunity for organisms not
intrinsic to the nasal passages to infect the sinuses, either by direct introduction or
disruption of anatomy (e.g., smoking marijuana and Aspergillus sinus disease;
cocaine resulting in septal perforation; tobacco resulting in increased inammation
and risk for neoplasms).
Anatomically Complicated Infections
Inadequate source control can lead to ongoing infection, secondary complications,
and antibiotic resistance. Identifying and controlling the source of infection is especially important in complicated infections that originate outside the sinuses or
extend from the sinuses into other tissues. For example, pathogen-directed therapy
based on cultures from direct aspiration of the maxillary sinus may still result in
treatment failure if an odontogenic infection, such as a periapical abscess with sinus
extension, is not addressed with adequate drainage. Alternatively, infection can be
complicated by bacteremia, extension from the sinuses into the orbits, abscess
development, erosion into the bone (osteomyelitis), or extension into the brain,
leading to meningitis, intracranial abscess, or cavernous sinus thrombosis. Diagnosis
of these secondary complications requires a high level of clinical suspicion. Clinical
symptoms and exam ndings should be reviewed for alarm signs (Table21.2),
including headaches, loss of vision, and meningismus. Infectious disease consultation is recommended to guide antimicrobial therapy in these populations.
Imaging is essential in dening the anatomic involvement of infection, guiding
surgical intervention, and selecting antimicrobial therapy effective within the
infected space. Comprehensive computed tomography including imaging of the
brain in addition to the sinuses or orbits should be considered [18]. Contrast media
may be helpful in evaluating for complications such as cavernous sinus thrombosis
or abscess. Magnetic resonance imaging can be very useful in identifying complications such as intracranial abscess, orbital complications, or invasive fungal sinusitis
[18]. Further specialist consultation can be helpful in determining appropriate diagnostics and therapeutics.

21 Intravenous Antimicrobial Therapy
219
Table 21.2
Alarm signs and symptoms Complications of rhinosinusitis
Neurologic decits
Severe headache
Periorbital edema
Diplopia/blindness
Neck pain/stiffness Bacterial meningitis
Nasal/palatal eschar Mucormycosis
qSOFA
– Fever >38.0°C or hypothermia <36.0°C
– Tachycardia >90 beats/min
– Tachypnea >20 breaths/min
– Leukocytosis >12×109/l or leukopenia
– Altered mentation
Hypotension
End-organ system dysfunction
Alarm signs or the documented presence of a complication from infectious rhinosinusitis should
prompt an infectious disease consultation to assist with treatment
a
SIRS: systemic inammatory response syndrome
b
qSOFA: quick sequential organ failure assessment
Alarm symptoms in chronic rhinosinusitis and associated infectious complications
Intracranial abscess
Bacterial meningitis/encephalitis
Superior sagittal and cavernous sinus
thrombosis
Subperiosteal abscess
Epidural empyema
Subdural empyema
Pre-septal cellulitis
Orbital cellulitis
Orbital abscess
Lemierre’s syndrome (septic thrombophlebitis)
a
or SIRSb criteria:
9
<4×10
/l
Necrosis
Two or more signs indicate the presence of
sepsis, complicating one of the above infections
(e.g., sepsis)
Septic shock
Toxic shock syndrome (group A Streptococcus
infection)
Identifying thePathogen andSusceptibility
Pathogen identication and susceptibility testing are necessary to guide antibiotic
treatment especially in the context of prior antibiotic therapy. Direct sampling for
culture from the sites of infection provides the most relevant information. Supercial
cultures of the nasal passages are not recommended, as they recover clinically irrelevant contaminants or commensal organisms; at a minimum, either endoscopic cultures of the middle meatus or direct aspiration of the sinuses via antral puncture
should be obtained [19]. If there is concern for secondary complications, such as an
abscess or osteomyelitis, attempts should be made to obtain cultures from these
sources, e.g., cultures of abscess contents or bone biopsy to obtain bone cultures, if
safe and feasible.
Obtaining multiple cultures allows for adequate material to be sent for specialized aerobic, anaerobic, fungal, mycobacterial, or nocardial cultures. Specics on

220
A. V. Dora and M. B. Goetz
optimal specimen, method of collection, and specimen transport details are enumerated in the Guide to Utilization of the Microbiology Laboratory for Diagnosis of
Infectious Diseases: 2018 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America
and the American Society for Microbiology [19]. Although fresh tissue or uid is
necessary for culturing organisms for denitive identication and susceptibility
testing, histologic examination of formalin-xed tissues using specialized stains
(e.g., Grocott’s Methenamine Silver stain for fungi) can still aid in diagnosis [20].
Traditional cultures may demonstrate aerobic and anaerobic bacterial organism
growth in days, whereas fungi and mycobacteria may require weeks of incubation
for growth [21, 22]. If tissue availability is limited, both specialist consultation with
infectious disease and the microbiology laboratory can help prioritize testing based
on clinical likelihood. Apart from traditional culture media, rapid and advanced
diagnostics have greatly assisted the identication and susceptibility testing of
pathogens; many of these tests are now widely available. If no organism is identied
by such means, frozen tissue can be sent to specialized referral laboratories for nextgeneration sequencing (NGS), wherein genetic material from the sample is amplied and sequenced to determine pathogen identication, virulence markers, and
genes conferring antimicrobial resistance [23].
The identication of the pathogen responsible for a are of recalcitrant rhinosinusitis is often challenging even when appropriate cultures are obtained. Not only
are there issues related to potential sampling error, but also recalcitrant chronic
rhinosinusitis is characterized by chronic dysbiosis, wherein the sinus ora has been
shaped by prior antimicrobial therapy and polymicrobial biolm formation [4].
Dysbiosis complicates the assessment of the contribution of any single organism to
infectious syndromes, as the presence of symptoms may be due to the synergistic
effects of multiple organisms and as symptomatic ares may reect uctuations in
the relative density of organisms and associated inammation [7, 24]. As is the case
with other polymicrobial infections (e.g., aspiration pneumonia, intra-abdominal
foot infections, bacterial vaginosis), therapeutic success does not necessarily require
treatment of all identied microorganisms.
The Role ofIntravenous Antimicrobial Therapy
There are no specic infectious disease guidelines for the use of empiric intravenous antimicrobial therapy in chronic rhinosinusitis. There is a dearth of highquality studies examining the utility of intravenous antibiotics for chronic
rhinosinusitis [5]; the literature is limited to small uncontrolled cohort studies with
variable short-term success and high relapse rates [25–27]. A Cochrane review published in 2016 was not able to identify any randomized controlled trials of intravenous antibiotic therapy [28]. Reviews of the available cohort studies have concluded
that in light of the reported complications of intravenous antibiotics agents for
chronic rhinosinusitis, such as deep vein thrombosis, drug reactions, and other
adverse effects [29], intravenous antibiotics should not be routinely used in chronic
rhinosinusitis, with exceptions for acute infectious complications, such as

21 Intravenous Antimicrobial Therapy
221
intracranial or intra-orbital infections [25, 30]. As discussed earlier in Fig.21.1,
intravenous antibiotics are only benecial in patients with rhinosinusitis ares that
are caused by infection, and the risk-benet prole of intravenous therapy supports
its use only in documented, complicated, or invasive infections, where adequate tissue concentrations of effective antibiotics cannot be achieved by oral
administration.
When toStart Empiric Intravenous Antimicrobial Therapy
Due to the variability of host factors and presentation of disease, our belief is that
the best approach in treatment includes careful identication of anatomic involvement and causative organism by obtaining the results of cultures prior to initiating
therapy. If the patient with suspected infection is clinically stable, it is appropriate
to defer antimicrobial treatment and to expedite obtaining cultures for true culturedirected therapy.
The severity of illness; the likelihood of infectious complications, e.g., intracranial infection; and the presence of impaired host defenses that may predispose
patients to rapid clinical progression should be the main considerations in deciding
when and whether to start empiric antimicrobial therapy in chronic rhinosinusitis.
Empiric antibiotic therapy is necessary in patients who have severe presentations
(i.e., symptoms noted in Table21.2) or life-threatening or complicated infections,
such as meningoencephalitis, orbital involvement, epidural or subdural empyema,
brain abscess, or bacteremia. Notably, individuals meeting at least two of the systemic inammatory reaction syndrome criteria (fever >38.0 °C or hypothermia
<36.0°C, tachycardia >90 beats/minute, tachypnea >20 breaths/minute, leukocytosis >12×109/l, or leukopenia <4×109/l) may have developed sepsis, complicating
one of the above infections [31]. When accompanied by hypotension or end-organ
system dysfunction, these ndings indicate the presence of septic shock and should
prompt urgent initiation of antibiotics; consultation with infectious disease is highly
recommended. Host risk factors may lower the threshold for treatment given the
potential risk for complications. Special populations such as those with cystic brosis, those with primary ciliary dyskinesia, and those who are profoundly immunosuppressed (e.g., organ transplantation, poorly controlled diabetes, and primary
immunodeciency) have an increased risk for severe, extensive infection with risk
for progression with secondary complications and catastrophic consequences
including hospitalization, transplant organ loss, or death. The prevention of these
outcomes is essential.
If sepsis is present or the infection is complicated, e.g., osteomyelitis of surrounding bone or concern for necrosis and decreased blood supply, preference
should be given to initiating intravenous antimicrobial therapy to ensure rapid antimicrobial activity and adequate concentrations of effective antibiotics at the site of
infection. When considering severe complications of infectious rhinosinusitis such
as intraocular infection or intracranial penetration, infectious disease specialist
involvement is recommended.

222
A. V. Dora and M. B. Goetz
Prior to starting empiric intravenous therapy, it is essential to draw two sets of
blood cultures; sinus cultures should be obtained as soon as possible. The use of
intravenous antibiotics with activity against gram-positive (Staphylococcus spp. and
Streptococcus spp.) and gram-negative (Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa) bacte-
ria is often appropriate, given the risk of resistant organisms due to the frequent
prior use of antibiotics in this patient population; however, the risk of emerging
antimicrobial resistance must be weighed, as there may be few options to treat a
future infection with a highly resistant organism.
By denition, patients with recalcitrant disease have been exposed to prior antimicrobial therapy. Consequently, presentation of an acute infectious are inevitably
leads to concern about infection by organisms resistant to narrow-spectrum antibiotics. However, consideration needs to be given to the particulars of the patient. The
best predictor of infection by resistant organisms is prior infection or colonization
by that organism [32]. Other considerations include repeated exposures to specic
antibiotics. Examples include the selection of uoroquinolone-resistant ora (and,
for complex reasons, MRSA) due to prior uoroquinolone exposure [33] and the
selection of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing organisms, such
as Klebsiella or E. coli, by frequent use of penicillins and cephalosporins, which
then require therapy with a carbapenem [34]. In addition to antimicrobial susceptibilities on the individual level, community-level susceptibilities and nosocomial
exposures should be considered when choosing empiric treatment. Local hospital
antibiograms that report the prevalence of resistant organisms in various settings
(inpatient versus outpatient clinics) can guide empiric antibiotic selection.
Finally, the severity of infection does not correlate with antimicrobial resistance.
Pathogens such as fully susceptible Staphylococcus spp. and Streptococcus spp. can
cause life-threatening infections in persons with normal host defenses and even
more so in select populations, such as patients with primary immunodeciencies,
including complement deciencies, immunoglobulin G deciency, immunoglobulin A deciency, or common variable immunodeciency (CVID), or those with
poorly controlled HIV infection. Options for empiric intravenous antimicrobial
therapy for adequate coverage are provided in Table21.3.
Table 21.3 Empiric intravenous and oral antimicrobial therapy
Suspected pathogens
MRSA Vancomycin 15mg/kg IV
MSSA Oxacillin 2g IV q6h
Intravenous therapy
loading dose*
Daptomycin 8mg/kg IV
q24h
Linezolid 600mg IV q12h
Ceftaroline 600mg IV
q12h*
Cefazolin 1g IV q8h*
Also covered by MRSA
agents
Oral therapy
Doxycycline 100mg PO q12h
Minocycline 100mg PO q12h
Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole
160mg/800mg PO q12h*
Linezolid 600mg PO q12h
Cefadroxil 500g PO q12h
Cephalexin 500mg PO q6h
Amoxicillin/clavulanate *
875mg/125mg PO q12h
Also covered by MRSA agents
(continued)
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
