Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_1116_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
02.09.2026
Размер:
20 Мб
Скачать
Outcomes and Complications After Sleeve Gastrectomy
Fig. 2 Change in HBA1c after sleeve gastrectomy over time. Adapted from McTigue et al. [21]
417
when comparing the effects of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with SG. Whilst some studies report no significant difference between the two [2224], others suggest Roux-en-Y will lead to a greater improvement in diabetes remission, and a more sustained improvement [21].
There are multiple different mechanisms contributing to the beneficial effect. Firstly, patients experience a hypocaloric state immediately following a bariatric operation aided by a restriction in caloric intake. Additionally, there is significant weight lost through the procedure, together, these play a fundamental role in influ­encing diabetes remission. This is exemplified when patients achieve comparable glycaemic changes whilst observing caloric restriction after a SG when compared with those who have similar caloric restriction without being operated upon [25].

4 Impact on Hypertension

There is a strong correlation between obesity and hypertension, and there are sev­eral proposed mechanisms that link the two conditions. This includes adipocytes increasing free fatty acid and angiotensinogen levels. Additionally, it causes stimu­lation of the renin angiotensin system leading to retention of salt and water, which increases the blood pressure [26]. As such, decreasing obesity will in turn reverse these effects.
Bariatric surgery has been demonstrated to be both effective and safe in patients who are clinically hypertensive. Studies suggest approximately 78.5% who undergo SG will see improvements in hypertension, whilst 67.1% will report reso­lution [27]. The literature on the effects of SG on hypertension suggests that SG does improve blood pressure levels. However, many studies don’t define the values that they classify as hypertensive, and there is heterogeneity in those that do define their values which makes it difficult to combine data, and fully analyse the out­comes [28].
S. Khan and H. Ashrafian418

5 Impact on Dyslipidaemia

As with hypertension, the link with obesity and dyslipidaemia is well established, with between 50–80% of obese patients also presenting with dyslipidaemia [29]. Obese patients tend to have lower amounts of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) lev­els, but greater amounts of low-density lipoproteins (LDL) and triglyceride levels. This may be as a result of the insulin resistance that obese patients also tend to have, which contributes to increased levels of free fatty acids being transported to the liver. The liver, in turn, produces very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL), which promotes the circulation of triglycerides and LDL levels [30]. Dyslipidaemia has significant consequences for patients, causing increased atherogenesis as well as adversely influencing cardiovascular disorders.
For the majority of patients (83.5%), SG will improve hyperlipidaemia, and a significant proportion of patients (54%) will experience complete resolution, per­haps as a result of the reversal of insulin resistance [31]. Patients will see a greater level of HDL, and lower LDL and triglyceride levels after the operation, with the effects lasting for over a year [32]. Removal of the fundus also leads to reduced gastric lipase and ghrelin secretion, hormones that contribute to dyslipidaemia [3335]. Additionally, reduced caloric intake and changes in gastrointestinal tran­sit time means that patients absorb less food which will all lead to improvements in hyperlipidaemia.

6 Complications

Whilst a SG is a routine procedure that produces significant benefits for patients, there are numerous complications that, although uncommon, should be consid­ered. The SG operation has a mortality of close to less than 0.01%, with morbidity typically associated in cases involving inexperienced surgeons [36]. As an exam­ple, mid-gastric stenosis, which occurs in less than 1% of cases, occurs as a result of over-sewing of the staple line or if the SG is calibrated on a tube that is too narrow [37, 38]. Complications can be categorised dependent on their expected duration of occurrence following the operation (Table 2). However, as will all operations, there are also non-surgical complications that are attributed to SG.

7 Non-Surgical Complications of Sleeve Gastrectomy

The non-surgical complications of SG include an increased incidence of pulmo­nary embolism, which is expected in up to 0.6% of bariatric patients. However, mortality remains low at up to 0.4% with appropriate anticoagulation [3942]. Additional respiratory complications including pneumopathies, pleural effusion, and atelectasis, although these are rare affecting approximately 1% of bariatric patients [43, 44]. As with all surgeries, prognosis tend to be worse with increasing
Outcomes and Complications After Sleeve Gastrectomy
419
Table 2 Complications associated with sleeve gastrectomy
Complications Haemorrhage Acute Pulmonary embolism Acute Nutritional deficiency Chronic GERD Chronic Abscess Chronic Stricture Chronic Leak Acute/chronic Alteration to bile flow Chronic Anatomical changes Chronic Hormonal changes Chronic Impact on metabolism Acute/chronic Cardiovascular effects Acute/chronic Changes to the microbiota Chronic
Chronicity
age, BMI, pre-existing cardiovascular risk factors, and intra-operative complica­tions. However, bariatric operations will specifically lead to nutritional deficien­cies, as a direct consequence of anatomical manipulation or indeed following the procedure for example due to vomiting and reduced food intake. Five years fol­lowing a SG, patients report a deficiency of zinc (14.3% of patients), vitamin D (42% of patients), vitamin B1 (30.8% of patients), along with hypoalbuminaemia (5.5% of patients), and low serum haemoglobin (28.6% of patients) [45].
8 Nutritional Deficiency After Sleeve Gastrectomy
The severity of disease as a result of nutritional deficiency would likely depend on the length of duration without correction. As an example, those with vitamin D deficiency can develop osteoporosis from secondary hyperparathyroidism. Additionally, deficiency of thiamine, a water-soluble B-complex vitamin, is nec­essary for cerebral metabolism. Deficiency, therefore, can damage regions of the brain including the cerebellum, mamillary bodies, superior and inferior colliculi, medial thalamus, periventricular region of the third ventricle, as well as the peri­aqueductal area. Whilst Wernicke encephalopathy is classically defined as a triad of ophthalmoplegia, ataxia, and reduced consciousness, many patients will not exhibit all these symptoms and so the condition may often go unreported [46]. As a side note, this condition is more likely to occur following a Roux-en-Y bypass because the jejunum is involved in maximal absorption of thiamine. Thiamine deficiency can also result in beriberi, a condition characterised by sensory and motor impairment [47].
S. Khan and H. Ashrafian420
Following a SG, vomiting is a prominent risk factor for vitamin deficiency. This can be due to the formation of strictures, leakage, or bleeding from the staple-line. Additionally, reduced energy intake, rapid weight loss, and non-compliance of supplements can all contribute to vitamin deficiency [4850].

9 Early Complications of Sleeve Gastrectomy

Early complications of SG include the formation of a fistula which is likely to affect approximately 2% of patients. Fistulae typically arise at the upper edge of the staple line and may be produced as a result of increased intragastric pres­sure, ischaemia on the staple lines, or indeed by poor technique. Other complica­tions include formation of strictures (0.7–4% in patients), haemorrhage (1.5% of patients), and leakage (1.5–2.4%) [5153]. It is important to recognise that com­plication rates increase if revision surgery is required or if patients require con­version of other bariatric surgical procedures into a SG [54]. Leakage typically occurs near the gastro-oesophageal junction at the top of the suture lines, but the post-operative time onset varies widely. Most cases will occur between 3–14 days following the operation with a median onset at 7 days [55].
These complications are largely driven by operative skill and the risk can be diminished with an experienced surgeon, and a compliant patient. However, the physiological changes that occur following a bariatric operation can sometimes be unpredictable and the effects of bariatric operations go beyond simply reducing weight. These effects can be split into 5 distinct categories through the so-called BRAVE effects of bypass surgery, that is: alteration to bile flow; restriction of the stomach; anatomical changes; effects on vagus nerve function; and entero-humoral modulation.

10 Alteration to Bile Flow After Sleeve Gastrectomy

SG can disrupt enterohepatic circulation resulting in elevated plasma bile acid [5658]. Bile acid salts bind to farnesoid X nuclear receptor (FXR), which in turn lead to downstream metabolic sequences that ultimately reduce bile acid biosyn­thesis from cholesterol [5963]. Additionally, FXR induces the secretion of fibro­blastic growth factor-19 (FGF-19) from enterocytes. In addition to decreasing cholesterol biosynthesis, FGF-19 also increases the basal metabolic rate [64]. The increased basal metabolic rate can be measured through reduced TSH levels and a greater conversion of T4 to T3 following bariatric operations [65]. As expected, this disruption to the lipid metabolism results in a reduction in low-density lipo­protein (LDL), an increase in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels, and a signifi­cant improvement in total cholesterol and triglyceride levels. These changes are measurable up to 10 years following the bariatric operation [66, 67]. The improve­ment in lipid profiles is likely polymodal but the influence of bile acids in regulat­ing transcription of several genes associated with lipolysis alongside fatty acid and
Outcomes and Complications After Sleeve Gastrectomy
triglyceride synthesis is well established [68]. Moreover, bile acids lead to reduced endoplasmic reticulum stress, which can improve glucose tolerance and beta-cell mass [69].
421

11 Anatomical Changes After Sleeve Gastrectomy

Anatomical changes that occur during a SG can result in complications. The majority (more than 85%) of leaks following SG occur in the upper part of the gastric tube [70] perhaps owing to the reduction in vascular supply of that region [71], and increased pressure in the gastric tube following the operation [72]. Additionally, anatomical changes clearly lead to a reduced stomach capacity and resultant decreased digestion which accelerates weight loss. Removal of the fun­dus during a SG results in significant hormonal effects as well. This isn’t surpris­ing, with the gastrointestinal tract being the largest endocrine organ in the body. The gastric fundus produces ghrelin, a hormone best known for its orexigenic properties. However, this 28 amino acid peptide also has many more important roles including inhibition of insulin secretion as well as upregulation of gluconeo­genesis and glycogenolysis leading to greater levels of glucose in the bloodstream [73]. However, the removal of the gastric fundus through a SG means that there are reduced ghrelin levels [74], which reverses the effects associated with ghre­lin. In these patients, the insulinostatic activity is overturned and the islet cells can secrete more insulin to meet with the increased demand in obese patients. This may be aided in part by increased levels of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) and peptide YY, both released from L cells in the small intestine as a result of the increased passage of undigested nutrients. GLP-1 can stimulate the pancreas to release insulin and additionally also preserves the beta cells involved in releas­ing insulin. On the other hand, peptide YY binds to Y2 receptors that are highly expressed in the arcuate nucleus, and acutely suppresses appetite but may also ameliorate insulin resistance [75].

12 Vagus Nerve Modulation After Sleeve Gastrectomy

The role of the vagus nerve is important in modulating energy metabolism, food intake, and glycaemic control. The afferent fibres of the vagus nerve is known to be sensitive to mechanical stretch following ingestion of food. The visceral sen­sory information is relayed to the nucleus of tractus solitarius, where converging signals from hormonal, metabolic, and cortical centres are processed to influence satiety [76, 77]. The vagus nerve is however perhaps more important in other bari­atric operations such as the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass where the ventral and dorsal gastric branches of the vagus nerve are transected when forming the gastric pouch. Disruption of normal vagal activity can lead to early satiety and weight loss. Interestingly, patients who experienced SG plus truncal vagotomy did not experi­ence an improvement in diabetes, when compared with SG alone [7880].
S. Khan and H. Ashrafian422

13 Cardiovascular Effects of Sleeve Gastrectomy

There are several mechanisms that link obesity with hypertension and, as with dia­betes, they involve intricate biochemical pathways, although it is still an evolv­ing area of research. Atherosclerotic plaques in patient’s arteries can impair the baroreflex sensitivity leading to impaired parasympathetic cardiac modulation, as a result of affected arteries becoming stiffer. This therefore leads to the sym­pathetic system dominating arterial resistance thereby inducing hypertension [81]. Furthermore, it appears that free fatty acids (FFAs) are critical to inducing hypertension in obese patients. They inhibit Na + /K + ATPase enzymes leading to greater vascular smooth muscle contraction and resistance. However, they can also have a more direct effect on ion channels causing activation of the smooth muscles and again leading to greater vascular resistance [82]. In the early phases of obesity, there is increased renal tubular reabsorption which causes primary retention. However, this is short lived and compensation through renal vasodila­tion and increased glomerular filtration rate tends to normalise the blood pressure. However, incomplete compensation can result in expansion of the extracellu­lar fluid and, over time, resetting of the kidney-fluid balance. This can be aided by compression of the renal medulla causing compression of the vasa recta and loop of Henle [83, 84]. However, the process causing hypertension is much more complex and research suggests hormones such as insulin and leptin, as well as endothelial dysfunction that can result from the pro-inflammatory state in obe­sity all have a role in causing hypertension [8587]. The reduction in the level of adipocytes following SG would diminish these effects and over 80% of patients reportedly see lasting improvements to their blood pressure [6].
Whilst bariatric surgery is highly effective for treating the comorbidities men­tioned, the results on triglycerides aren’t as successful. The total cholesterol levels don’t change significantly but there is an improvement in the HDL and triglyceride levels. These changes appear to be long-lasting [88, 89].

14 Effects on Microbiota After Sleeve Gastrectomy

Additionally, the microbiota composition changes following a SG surgery. Obese patients have already been shown to have increased Firmicutes and decreased Bacteroidetes [90, 91]. However, following SG, there appears to be an increase in the level of Verrunomicrobia bacteria, and significant increases in the level of Akkermansia muciniphila. Studies suggest Akkermansia muciniphila can reduce weight and adipocyte levels, as well as improve metabolic outcomes [92, 93]. The changes in microbiota composition are gradual when compared to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, perhaps because Roux-en-Y leads to a much greater reduction in pH of the gut environment [94].
Outcomes and Complications After Sleeve Gastrectomy
423

15 Impact on Metabolism After Bariatric Surgery

There is also a significant effect on patients’ metabolic state. This is important considering the substantial comorbidities that obese patients present with. These include dyslipidaemia, hypertension, heart failure, type 2 diabetes. Furthermore, obesity can also lead to renal failure and, as our understanding about obesity evolves, it is evident that the harmful biochemical processes involving fatty acids and triglycerides can produce far more significant pathology than previously thought.
Fatty acids can activate several serine kinase pathways, notably IkK kinase (IKK) and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) that are involved in particularly potent proinflammatory cascades. This can act to inhibit insulin function leading to insu­lin resistance and contributing to a greater risk of developing type 2 diabetes [95]. Further studies have demonstrated the involvement of the immune system which becomes activated by the action of fatty acids on toll-like receptors in adipocytes and macrophages. The downstream inflammatory cascade can lead to further insu­lin resistance and a greater cardiovascular risk [96, 97]. It is clear therefore that obesity is a highly complex process. As such, bariatric procedures should be given greater consideration for their ability to alleviate many of these harmful comor­bidities affiliated with obesity.

16 Conclusion

Since the introduction of SG, the outcomes of surgery are durable with weight recidivism and success comparable to other stapled/bypass bariatric procedures. Complications from SG are uncommon but can be severe, and the involved mech­anisms are only partially revealed. However, optimisation of risk factors in the months leading up to the operation can significantly improve outcomes in patients. This involves an early implementation of a healthy lifestyle including advising patients to exercise more regularly and adopt a low fat, low salt diet. Additionally, cessation of smoking and limiting alcohol consumption along with optimisation of cardiovascular disease and diabetes will not only aid in improving weight-loss outcomes but will also lead to a reduction in complications.

References

1. Pedroso FE, Angriman F, Endo A, et al. Weight loss after bariatric surgery in obese adoles-
cents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Obes Relat Dis Off J Am Soc Bariatr Surg. 2018;14(3).
2. Committee ACI. Updated position statement on sleeve gastrectomy as a bariatric procedure.
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8(3):e21–26.
3. Sjostrom L, Lindroos AK, Peltonen M, et al. Lifestyle, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk fac-
tors 10 years after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(26):2683–93.
S. Khan and H. Ashrafian424
4. Sarkhosh K, Birch DW, Shi X, Gill RS, Karmali S. The impact of sleeve gastrectomy on
hypertension: a systematic review. Obes Surg. 2012;22(5):832–7.
5. Gill RS, Birch DW, Shi X, Sharma AM, Karmali S. Sleeve gastrectomy and type 2 diabetes
mellitus: a systematic review. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6(6):707–13.
6. Al Khalifa K, Al Ansari A, Alsayed AR, Violato C. The impact of sleeve gastrectomy on
hyperlipidemia: a systematic review. J Obes. 2013;2013:643530.
7. van Rutte PW, Smulders JF, de Zoete JP, Nienhuijs SW. Outcome of sleeve gastrectomy as a
primary bariatric procedure. Br J Surg. 2014;101(6):661–8.
8. Sieber P, Gass M, Kern B, Peters T, Slawik M, Peterli R. Five-year results of laparoscopic
sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10(2):243–9.
9. Rawlins L, Rawlins MP, Brown CC, Schumacher DL. Sleeve gastrectomy: 5-year outcomes
of a single institution. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9(1):21–5.
10. Himpens J, Dobbeleir J, Peeters G. Long-term results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for
obesity. Ann Surg. 2010;252(2):319–24.
11. Eid GM, Brethauer S, Mattar SG, Titchner RL, Gourash W, Schauer PR. Laparoscopic sleeve
gastrectomy for super obese patients: forty-eight percent excess weight loss after 6 to 8 years with 93% follow-up. Ann Surg. 2012;256(2):262–5.
12. Diamantis T, Apostolou KG, Alexandrou A, Griniatsos J, Felekouras E, Tsigris C. Review
of long-term weight loss results after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10(1):177–83.
13. D’Hondt M, Vanneste S, Pottel H, Devriendt D, Van Rooy F, Vansteenkiste F. Laparoscopic
sleeve gastrectomy as a single-stage procedure for the treatment of morbid obesity and the resulting quality of life, resolution of comorbidities, food tolerance, and 6-year weight loss. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(8):2498–504.
14. Abd Ellatif ME, Abdallah E, Askar W, et al. Long term predictors of success after laparo-
scopic sleeve gastrectomy. Int J Surg. 2014;12(5):504–8.
15. Shi X, Karmali S, Sharma AM, Birch DW. A review of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for
morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2010;20(8):1171–7.
16. Chang S-H, Stoll CRT, Song J, Esteban Varela J, Eagon CJ, Colditz GA. The effectiveness
and risks of bariatric surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis, 2003–2012. JAMA Surg. 2014;149(3).
17. Schauer PR, Bhatt DL, Kirwan JP, et al. Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy
for diabetes - 5-year outcomes. The New Engl J Med. 2017;376(7).
18. Adams TD, Arterburn DE, Nathan DM, Eckel RH. Clinical outcomes of metabolic surgery:
microvascular and macrovascular complications. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(6).
19. Arterburn D, et al. Comparing the outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric
bypass for severe obesity. JAMA. 2018;319(3).
20. Coleman KJ, Haneuse S, Johnson E, et al. Long-term microvascular disease outcomes in
patients with type 2 diabetes after bariatric surgery: evidence for the legacy effect of surgery. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(8).
21. McTigue KM, Wellman R, Nauman E, et al. Comparing the 5-year diabetes outcomes of
sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass: the national patient-centered clinical research net­work (PCORNet) bariatric study. JAMA Surg. 2020.
22. Salminen P, Helmiö M, Ovaska J, et al. Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs lapa-
roscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on weight loss at 5 years among patients with morbid obesity: the SLEEVEPASS randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;319(3).
23. Li J, Lai D, Wu D. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus laparoscopic sleeve
gastrectomy to treat morbid obesity-related comorbidities: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2016;26(2).
24. Peterli R, Wolnerhanssen BK, Peters T, et al. Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs
laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on weight loss in patients with morbid obesity: the SM-BOSS randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;319(3):255–65.
Outcomes and Complications After Sleeve Gastrectomy
425
25. Abbasi J. Unveiling the “Magic” of diabetes remission after weight-loss surgery. JAMA.
2017;317(6).
26. Deitel M, Gagner M, Erickson AL, Crosby RD. Third international summit: current status of
sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis Off J Am Soc Bariatr Surg. 2011;7(6).
27. Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, et al. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and
meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004;292(14).
28. Graham C, Switzer N, Reso A, et al. Sleeve gastrectomy and hypertension: a systematic
review of long-term outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2019;33(9).
29. Catapano AL, Graham I, De Backer G, et al. 2016 ESC/EAS guidelines for the management
of dyslipidaemias. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(39).
30. Bays HE, Toth PP, Kris-Etherton PM, et al. Obesity, adiposity, and dyslipidemia: a consensus
statement from the national lipid association. J Clin Lipidol. 2013;7(4).
31. Omana JJ, Nguyen SQ, Herron D, Kini S. Comparison of comorbidity resolution and
improvement between laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(10).
32. Raffaelli M, Guidone C, Callari C, Iaconelli A, Bellantone R, Mingrone G. Effect of gastric
bypass versus diet on cardiovascular risk factors. Ann Surg. 2014;259(4).
33. Auclair N, Patey N, Melbouci L, et al. Acylated ghrelin and the regulation of lipid metabo-
lism in the intestine. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1).
34. Pafumi Y, Lairon D, de la Porte PL, Juhel C, Storch J, Hamosh M, Armand M. Mechanisms
of inhibition of triacylglycerol hydrolysis by human gastric lipase. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(31).
35. Romo Vaquero M, Yáñez-Gascón MJ, García Villalba R, et al. Inhibition of gastric lipase
as a mechanism for body weight and plasma lipids reduction in zucker rats fed a rosemary extract rich in carnosic acid. PLoS One. 2012;7.
36. Chang SH, Stoll CR, Song J, Varela JE, Eagon CJ, Colditz GA. The effectiveness and risks
of bariatric surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis, 2003–2012. JAMA Surg. 2014;149(3):275–87.
37. Rosenthal RJ, Diaz AA, Arvidsson D, et al. International sleeve gastrectomy expert panel
consensus statement: best practice guidelines based on experience of >12,000 cases. Surg Obes Relat Dis Off J Am Soc Bariatr Surg. 2012;8(1).
38. Dapri G, Cadière GB, Himpens J. Laparoscopic seromyotomy for long stenosis after sleeve
gastrectomy with or without duodenal switch. Obes Surg. 2009;19(4).
39. Finks JF, English WJ, Carlin AM, et al. Predicting risk for venous thromboembolism with
bariatric surgery: results from the Michigan bariatric surgery collaborative. Ann Surg. 2012;255(6).
40. Biertho L, Lebel S, Marceau S, et al. Perioperative complications in a consecutive series of
1000 duodenal switches. Surg Obes Relat Dis Off J Am Soc Bariatr Surg. 2013;9(1).
41. Kakarla VR, Nandipati K, Lalla M, Castro A, Merola S. Are laparoscopic bariatric proce-
dures safe in superobese (BMI 50 kg/m
2
) patients? An NSQIP data analysis. Surg Obes
Relat Dis Off J Am Soc Bariatr Surg. 2011;7(4).
42. Magee CJ, Barry J, Javed S, Macadam R, Kerrigan D. Extended thromboprophylaxis reduces
incidence of postoperative venous thromboembolism in laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis Off J Am Soc Bariatr Surg. 2010;6(3).
43. Nguyen NT, Lee SL, Goldman C, et al. Comparison of pulmonary function and postopera-
tive pain after laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass: a randomized trial. J Am Coll Surg. 2001;192(4).
44. van Huisstede A, et al. Pulmonary function testing and complications of laparoscopic bariat-
ric surgery. Obes Surg. 2013;23(10).
45. Saif T, Strain GW, Dakin G, Gagner M, Costa R, Pomp A. Evaluation of nutrient status after
laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy 1, 3, and 5 years after surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis Off J Am Soc Bariatr Surg. 2012;8(5).
S. Khan and H. Ashrafian426
46. Harper CG, Giles M, Finlay-Jones R. Clinical signs in the Wernicke-Korsakoff complex: a
retrospective analysis of 131 cases diagnosed at necropsy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1986;49(4).
47. Durán B, de Angulo DR, Parrilla P. Beriberi: an uncommon complication of sleeve gastrec-
tomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis Off J Am Soc Bariatr Surg. 2015;11(6).
48. Clements RH, Katasani VG, Palepu R, et al. Incidence of vitamin deficiency after laparo-
scopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in a university hospital setting. Am Surg. 2006;72(12).
49. Watson WD, Verma A, Lenart MJ, et al. MRI in acute Wernicke’s encephalopathy.
Neurology. 2003;61(4).
50. Aasheim ET. Wernicke encephalopathy after bariatric surgery: a systematic review. Ann
Surg. 2008;248(5).
51. Aurora AR, Khaitan L, Saber AA. Sleeve gastrectomy and the risk of leak: a systematic anal-
ysis of 4,888 patients. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(6).
52. Parikh M, Issa R, McCrillis A, Saunders JK, Ude-Welcome A, Gagner M. Surgical strate-
gies that may decrease leak after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 9991 cases. Ann Surg. 2013;257(2).
53. Zellmer JD, Mathiason MA, Kallies KJ, Kothari SN. Is laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy a
lower risk bariatric procedure compared with laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass? A meta-analysis. Am J Surg. 2014;208(6).
54. Tan JT, Kariyawasam S, Wijeratne T, Chandraratna HS. Diagnosis and management of gas-
tric leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2010;20(4).
55. Sakran N, Goitein D, Raziel A, et al. Gastric leaks after sleeve gastrectomy: a multicenter
experience with 2,834 patients. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(1).
56. Haluzíková D, Lacinová Z, Kaválková P, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy differ-
entially affects serum concentrations of FGF-19 and FGF-21 in morbidly obese subjects. Obesity (Silver Spring, Md). 2013;21(7).
57. Steinert RE, Peterli R, Keller S, et al. Bile acids and gut peptide secretion after bariatric sur-
gery: a 1-year prospective randomized pilot trial. Obesity (Silver Spring, Md). 2013;21(12).
58. Ryan KK, Tremaroli V, Clemmensen C, et al. FXR is a molecular target for the effects of
vertical sleeve gastrectomy. Nature. 2014;509(7499).
59. Brendel C, Schoonjans K, Botrugno OA, Treuter E, Auwerx J. The small heterodimer part-
ner interacts with the liver X receptor alpha and represses its transcriptional activity. Mol Endocrinol (Baltimore, Md). 2002;16(9).
60. Goodwin B, Jones SA, Price RR, et al. A regulatory cascade of the nuclear receptors FXR,
SHP-1, and LRH-1 represses bile acid biosynthesis. Mol Cell. 2000;6(3).
61. Makishima M, Okamoto AY, Repa JJ, et al. Identification of a nuclear receptor for bile acids.
Science (New York, NY). 1999;284(5418).
62. Parks DJ, Blanchard SG, Bledsoe RK, et al. Bile acids: natural ligands for an orphan nuclear
receptor. Science (New York, NY). 1999;284(5418).
63. Resnekov L, Chediak J, Hirsh J, Lewis HD Jr. Antithrombotic agents in coronary artery dis-
ease. Chest. 1986;89(2 Suppl).
64. Fu L, John LM, Adams SH, et al. Fibroblast growth factor 19 increases metabolic rate and
reverses dietary and leptin-deficient diabetes. Endocrinology. 2004;145(6).
65. Watanabe M, Houten SM, Mataki C, et al. Bile acids induce energy expenditure by promot-
ing intracellular thyroid hormone activation. Nature. 2006;439(7075).
66. Milone M, Lupoli R, Maietta P, et al. Lipid profile changes in patients undergoing bariatric
surgery: a comparative study between sleeve gastrectomy and mini-gastric bypass. Int J Surg. (London, England). 2015;14.
67. Corradini SG, Eramo A, Lubrano C, et al. Comparison of changes in lipid profile after
bilio-intestinal bypass and gastric banding in patients with morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2005;15(3).