Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5814_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
02.09.2026
Размер:
21 Мб
Скачать
37Chapter two: Fundamentals of acoustic propagation
vf
c
2(cos)
Doppler eect
(a) (b)
Observer
' '
S
p
Figure 2.23 A stationary observer perceives a change in frequency of a wave emitted by a moving source toward the observer resulting from a change in
wavelength from λ to λ’. (a) The source is stationary. (b) The source is moving at a velocity v.
S
p
For the situation where the velocity is making an angle of θ relative to the direction of sound propagation, as shown in Figure 2.23(b), v in Equation (2.43) should be replaced by v(cosθ):
f
=
d
θ
(2.44)
The Doppler effect is used in ultrasonic Doppler devices for the mea­surement and imaging of blood ow transcutaneously, i.e., without penetrat­ing the skin in any manner. In these devices ultrasonic waves are launched into a blood vessel by an ultrasonic transducer, and the scattered radiation from the moving red cells is detected by either the same transducer or a separate transducer. Appropriate instrumentation is incorporated to extract the Doppler frequency, which is proportional to the red cell velocity.
References and Further Reading Materials
American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. Safety considerations for diagnostic
ultrasound. Laurel, MD: AIUM, 1984.
Dunn F and Goss SA. Denitions of terms and measurements of acoustical quanti-
ties. In Greenleaf JF (ed.), Tissue characterization with ultrasound. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1986, pp. 1–14.
38 Diagnostic ultrasound: imaging and blood ow measurements
Fei DY and Shung KK. Ultrasonic backscatter from mammalian tissues. J Acoust
Soc Am 1985; 78: 871–877.
Fields S and Dunn F. Correlation of echographic visualizability of tissue with
biological composition and physiological state. J Acoust Soc Am 1973; 54: 809–811.
Geleskie JV and Shung KK. Further studies on the acoustic impedance of major
bovine blood vessel walls. J Acoust Soc Am 1982; 71: 467–470.
Goss SA and O’Brien WD Jr. Direct ultrasonic velocity measurements of mamma-
lian collagen threads. J Acoust Soc Am 1979; 65: 507–511. Greenleaf JA. Tissue characterization with ultrasound. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1986. Hamilton MF and Blackstock DT. Nonlinear acoustics. San Diego: Academic Press, 1998. Hete B and Shung KK. Scattering of ultrasound from skeletal muscle tissue. IEEE
Trans Ultrasonics Ferroelect Freq Cont 1993; 40: 354–365. Kossoff G. Radiation force. In Reid JM and Sikov MR (eds.), Interaction of ultra-
sound and biological tissues. Rockville, MD: FDA, 1972, pp. 159–161. Malecki I. Physical foundations of technical acoustics. New York: Pergman Press, 1969. Morse PM and Ingard KU. Theoretical acoustics. New York: McGraw Hill, 1968. Nightingale K. Acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) imaging: A review. Curr
Med Imaging Rev 2011; 7: 328–339. Pierce A. Acoustics: An introduction to physical principles and applications. New York:
McGraw Hill, 1986. Shung KK and Thieme GA. Ultrasonic scattering by biological tissues. Boca Raton,
FL: CRC Press, 1993. Tranquart F, Grenier N, Eder V, and Pourcelot L. Clinical use of ultrasound tissue
harmonic imaging. Ultrasonics Med Biol 1999; 25: 889–894. Twersky V. Acoustic bulk parameters in distributions of pair-correlated scatterers.
J Acoust Soc Am 1978; 64: 1710–1719. Westervelt PJ. The theory of steady forces caused by sound waves. J Acoust Soc Am
1951; 23: 312–315. Wickline SA, Perez JE, and Miller JG. Cardiovascular tissue characterization in
vivo. In Shung KK and Thieme GA (eds.), Ultrasonic scattering in biological
tissues. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1993, pp. 313–345. Yuan YW and Shung KK. Ultrasonic backscatter from owing whole blood. I.
Dependence on shear rate and hematocrit. J Acoust Soc Am 1988; 84: 52–58.
chapter three
Ultrasonic transducers and arrays
All ultrasonic imaging systems require a device called an ultrasonic trans­ducer to convert electrical energy into ultrasonic or acoustic energy and vice versa. Ultrasonic transducers come in a variety of forms and sizes, ranging from single-element transducers for mechanical scanning to lin­ear arrays to multidimensional arrays for electronic scanning. Although the performance of an ultrasonic scanner is critically dependent upon transducers/arrays, array/transducer performance has been one of the bottlenecks that has prevented current ultrasonic imagers from reach­ing their theoretical resolution limit. The primary reason is that medi­cal ultrasonic array/transducer design and fabrication are processes of a broad interdisciplinary nature. They require knowledge from a variety of disciplines, such as acoustics and vibration, electrical engineering, mate­rial sciences and engineering, medical imaging, and anatomy and physi­ology. It is no wonder that even to date the design of transducers is still mostly empirical, generally involving a trial-and-error approach. Many manufacturers regard their expertise in designing and manufacturing transducers as a trade secret of the highest order.
The most critical component of an ultrasonic transducer is a piezo-
electric element.
3.1 Piezoelectric effect
The phenomenon that a material upon the application of an electrical eld changes its physical dimensions and vice versa is known as the piezo­electric effect (pressure-electric effect) (Cady, 1964; Kino, 1987). The piezo­electric effect was discovered by French physicists Pierre and Jacques Curie in 1880. The direct and reverse piezoelectric effects are illustrated in Figure3.1(a) and (b), respectively. The direct effect refers to the phenom­enon in which the application of a stress causes a net charge to appear across the electrodes, whereas the inverse effect concerns the production of a strain upon the application of a potential difference across the elec­trodes. Certain naturally occurring crystals, such as quartz and tourma­line, are piezoelectric. In these single crystals where a lattice structure is repeated at a regular manner, forming a 3D pattern throughout the mate­rial, the molecular structure does not exhibit a separation of charges; i.e., the center of the negative charge coincides with that of the positive charge.
39
40 Diagnostic ultrasound: imaging and blood ow measurements
s
(a)
+ + + + + +
Strai
Strai
Potential
es
(b)
– +
+
– +
– – – – – –
Stress
Stress
Charge
Charge
+ + + + + +
+ –
– – – – ––
Direct Piezoelectric Effect
n
n
Reverse Piezoelectric Effect
Electrode
Electrod
Figure 3.1 (a) Direct piezoelectric effect where a stress induces a charge separa­tion. (b) Reverse piezoelectric effect where a potential difference across the elec­trodes induces a strain.
Thus, in the normal state it is neutral. Upon the application of a strain, the lattice structure is disturbed, causing a charge separation. Similarly, an applied external electric eld causes the centers of the positive and negative charges to separate, resulting in a displacement, as shown in Figure 3.2. Naturally occurring piezoelectric crystals are seldom used today as transducer materials in diagnostic ultrasonic imaging because of their weak piezoelectric properties.
In a class of materials called ferroelectric materials, which are poly­crystalline, the periodicity of the crystal lattices is disrupted at the so­called grain boundaries (Safari and Akdogan, 2008). Figure3.3 shows the electron micrograph of lead zirconate titanate, Pb(Zr, Ti)O3 or PZT, con­sisting of many grains, each of which is composed of many domains, as
41Chapter three: Ultrasonic transducers and arrays
(a) (b)
Upon strain
Grains
Fine grain Coarse grain
Neutral state
+
+
+
Figure 3.2 Atomic structure of a natural piezoelectric crystal (a) is distorted upon the application of external strain producing a charge separation (b).
illustrated in Figure3.4. Ferroelectric materials have spontaneous polar­ization or electric dipoles as opposed to paraelectric materials, which have no spontaneous dipoles. The most popular ferroelectric material is PZT, which possesses very strong piezoelectric properties following a prepa­ration step called poling. The physical reason that the piezoelectric phe­nomenon occurs in a ferroelectric material can be idealistically explained by considering that a ferroelectric material consists of many domains,
Figure 3.3 Electron micrograms of PZT materials with ne grain and coarse grain size.
42 Diagnostic ultrasound: imaging and blood ow measurements
omains
+
Figure 3.4 Each grain of a ferroelectric piezoelectric material consists of many domains.
D
+
each possessing innumerable electric dipoles, resulting in a net electric dipole. In the virgin state of the material, it is electrically neutral. A net dipole or polarization can be produced by poling or applying a strong electrical eld in a certain direction to align the dipoles to that direction. This net polarization disappears when the temperature is raised above a material-specic level called Curie temperature, because above this tem­perature the directions of the net dipoles of all domains become random, thus producing no net dipole. After the material is poled, producing a net dipole for each domain, an electrical potential difference applied across a slab of piezoelectric material realigns the dipoles in the material to a preferential direction, resulting in a deformation or a change in the thickness of the slab. Conversely, a stress that causes a deformation of the material and reorientation of the dipoles induces a net charge across the electrodes.
Poling or polarization of a ferroelectric material is carried out by heat­ing it to a temperature just above the Curie temperature of the material, and then allowing it to cool down slowly in the presence of a strong elec­tric eld, typically in the order of 20 kV/cm, applied in the direction in which the piezoelectric effect is required. The electrical eld is usually applied to the material by means of two electrodes. This process aligns the dipoles along the direction of the electrical eld. Poling is typically done in oil to prevent electric arcing. There are a great variety of ferro­electric materials. Barium titanate (BaTiO3) was among the rst that were developed. Single-crystal ferroelectric materials such as lead metaniobate (PbNb2O6) and lithium niobate (LiNbO3) have also been found to possess strong piezoelectric properties.
Certain piezoelectric properties of PZT can be enhanced by doping. As a result, many types of PZT are commercially available.
The relationship between the applied electric eld and the resultant polarization is material specic and, in general, has a characteristic in the form of a hysteresis loop, shown in Figure3.5. Remanent polarization and coercive eld are dened, respectively, as the value of polarization when
30
Voltage (V)
ercive eld
43Chapter three: Ultrasonic transducers and arrays
20
10
)
2
0
P (µC/cm
–10
–20
–30
–400 –200 0200 400
Figure 3.5 Polarization (P) versus electrical eld or voltage (V) loop of a ferroelec- tric piezoelectric material.
Remanent polarization
Co
the electric eld = 0 or voltage = 0 after poling and the value of the electric eld when there is no polarization. Remanent polarization is a measure of the piezoelectric strength of a material, whereas coercive eld is a mea­sure of the propensity of a material to depole. For both, the larger, the better.
Many ferroelectric materials have different ferroelectric states depend­ing on the constituent composition. For instance, PZT has three different states: cubic, rhombohedral, and tetragonal, depending on the PbTiO3 and PbZrO3 composition, as shown in Figure3.6. Its piezoelectric proper­ties are the best at the morphotropic phase boundary (MPB) between the rhombohedral and tetragonal states, where the volume concentrations of PbTiO3 and PbZrO3 are 48 and 52%, respectively. The state of a ferroelec­tric material may shift from one to another at a certain temperature called phase transition temperature. Curie temperature is one of the transition temperatures. For PZT it is the transition temperature between the cubic and rhombohedral states when the PbTiO3 concentration is lower than 48%. Above this temperature, the state becomes cubic and there is no net dipole. For example the Curie temperature for BaTiO3 is 120°C, but there is a transition temperature at 10°C.
In order to dene and better understand the physical meaning of the piezoelectric properties of a material, the constitutive equations that gov­ern the piezoelectric effect must be examined.
44 Diagnostic ultrasound: imaging and blood ow measurements
Temperature [°C]
3
500
450
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
PbZrO
Rhombohedral
010203040506070
3
Cubic
Pb(Ti
MPB
0.48Zr0.52)O3
Morphotropic phase boundary
Tetragonal
80 90 100
PbTiO
Figure 3.6 PZT has three ferroelectric states.
3.2 Piezoelectric constitutive equation
Since the piezoelectric effect involves the interaction between electric elds and the mechanical deformation, the constitutive equations relate the electric properties to mechanical properties of the material.
With no electric eld, the stress and strain relationship has been described in Chapter 2, given by Equations (2.3) to (2.5). Since most mate­rials are anisotropic, this relationship written in tensor form is given by
[κ] = [C][ε] (3.1) where [κ], [C], and [ε] are, respectively, the stress, the elastic constant, and
the strain tensor. Upon the application of an electric eld, Equation (3.1) needs to be modied to include the effect of the electric eld. Taking the electric eld [E] and the strain [ε] as independent variables and the electric displacement [D] and stress [κ] as dependent variables, the piezoelectric constitutive equations are given by
[κ] = [CE][ε] – [e][E] (3.2) [D] = [Kε][E] + [e] [ε] (3.3)
45Chapter three: Ultrasonic transducers and arrays
where [e], [CE], and [Kε] are the piezoelectric stress constant tensor, elastic constant tensor when the electric eld [E] = 0, and dielectric constant ten- sor when strain [ε] = 0 or clamped dielectric constant tensor. The physical meaning of [CE] and [κε] can be readily understood by setting [E] and [ε] = 0, respectively, in Equations (3.2) and (3.3). Letting [ε] = 0 in Equation (3.2),
[e] = – [κ]/[E] (3.4)
where [e], the piezoelectric stress constant, is the resultant stress change per unit change in electric eld without strain or while being clamped. It has the unit of newtons/v-m or coulombs/m2.
The constitutive equation can be written in another form when [κ] and [E] are treated as independent variables.
[ε] = [d][E] + [γE][κ] (3.5) [D] = [Kκ][E] + [d][κ] (3.6)
where [Kκ] is the free dielectric constant, which is the dielectric constant when there is no stress, and [d] = [ε]/[E] is the transmission or piezoelec- tric strain constant, representing the resultant change in strain per unit change in electric eld with a unit of coulombs/newton when there is no stress. [γE] = [ε]/[κ] from Equation (3.5) is the compliance of the material for [E] = 0 and [γE] = 1/[CE]. The relationship between [e] and [d] can be found from Equation (3.2) by setting [κ] = 0,
[CE] [ε] – [e] [E] = 0
Therefore,
[e] = [CE] [ε]/[E] = [CE] [d]
If [D] and [κ] are treated as independent variables, the constitutive equations are given by
[E] = [ακ][D] – [g][κ] (3.7) [ε] = [g][D] + [γD][κ] (3.8)
where [g] = –[E]/[κ] is the receiving constant with a unit of volt-m/new- ton, representing the change in electric eld per unit change in applied stress when [D] = 0; i.e., there is no current or under open circuit condi­tions. [γD] is the compliance when [D] = 0, and [ακ] = 1/[Kκ] when [κ] = 0.
46 Diagnostic ultrasound: imaging and blood ow measurements


Stored Mechanical Energy
The dielectric constant [K] of a piezoelectric material depends on the extent of freedom of the material. Two values are often quoted in the lit­erature. If the material is clamped so that it cannot move in response to an applied eld or the strain is zero, the dielectric constant measured is designated as the clamped dielectric constant [Kε]. If the material is free to move without restriction, the dielectric constant measured is denoted as [Kκ], the free dielectric constant. The transmitting constant and the receiv­ing constant are related by the following relationship (Kino, 1987):
[d] = [g] [Kκ] (3.9)
As was mentioned, these equations are in tensor form because most piezoelectric materials or crystals are anisotropic. To completely describe the piezoelectric properties of a material, 18 piezoelectric stress constants and 18 receiving constants are required. Fortunately, since these materials usually are symmetric, a smaller number of constants are actually needed. For instance, there are only ve constants for quartz. For single crystals, the principal axes are dened by the crystalline axes (Cady, 1964). A plate cut with its surface perpendicular to the x-axis is called x-cut, and so forth. The x-, y-, z-directions are indicated by numbers 1, 2, 3. For polarized fer­roelectric ceramics, the 3 direction is usually reserved for the polarization direction. A piezoelectric strain constant, d33, represents the strain produced in the 3 direction by applying an electric eld in the 3 direction, and d13 is the strain in the 1 direction produced by an electric eld in the 3 direction when there is no external stress. Here it is important to note that the piezoelectric properties of a material depend upon boundary conditions, and therefore upon the shape of the material. For example, the piezoelectric constant of a material in the plate form is different from that in the rod form.
The capability of a piezoelectric material to convert one form of energy into another is determined by its electromechanical coupling coefcient (ECC), dened as
ECC
Stored Mechancial Energy
=

TotalStored Energy
The total stored energy includes both mechanical and electrical energy. Therefore,
2
=
ECC

TotalStored Eenergy
It should be noted that this quantity is not the efciency of the transducer. If the transducer is lossless, its efciency is 100%, but the