Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5886_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Foreword
- •Preface
- •Acknowledgements
- •Contents
- •Contributors
- •About the Editors
- •1.2.2.3 Progeria
- •1. Bioprocessing, Bioengineering and Process Chemistry in the Biopharmaceutical Industry: Using Chemistry and Bioengineering to Improve the Performance of Biologics
- •1.1 Introduction
- •1.2.2.2 Cystic Fibrosis
- •1.3.2.1 ADC Drugs
- •1.4 Top 25 Best-Selling Drugs
- •1.5.1 An Overview
- •1.5.2 Synthetic Biology
- •1.5.8 Biopharmaceutical Regulatory CMC
- •1.5.9 Technology Transfer
- •References
- •2.1 What Is Synthetic Biology?
- •2.6 CAR-T Cell Therapies
- •2.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2.1 Oligonucleotide Synthesis
- •3.2.1.1 Early Synthetic Chemistries
- •3.2.2 Solid Supports
- •3.2.3 Modern Oligo Synthesis Platforms
- •3.3 Gene Synthesis
- •3.3.1 Early DNA Assembly Methods
- •3.3.2 Array-Based Gene Synthesis
- •3.4 New Discovery Bottleneck
- •3.4.1.1 Hybridoma Technology
- •3.4.1.2 Phage Display Technology
- •3.4.1.3 Synthetic Antibody Library Construction
- •Semi-Synthetic Libraries
- •Fully Synthetic Libraries
- •3.5 Perspectives
- •References
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.2.1 Batch
- •4.2.2 Fed-Batch
- •4.2.4 Hybrid Processes
- •4.2.7 Dynamic Perfusion Processes
- •4.3.2 Glucose Limitation
- •4.4.1 N-1 Perfusion
- •4.4.3 Linked Bioreactors
- •4.5 Process Analytical Technology
- •4.6 Single-Use Bioreactors (SUBs)
- •4.7 Conclusions
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.2.1 Molecular Format Considerations
- •5.2.1.1 The Charge-Based Electrostatic Approach
- •5.2.1.2 The Knob into Hole Approach
- •5.2.2.1 Stable CHO Host Cell Integration System—Random or Targeted?
- •5.2.2.2 Expression Vector Considerations
- •5.2.2.3 Cell Line Screening Strategy Considerations
- •5.3.1 Upstream Process Development
- •5.3.2 Downstream Process Development Considerations
- •5.3.2.1 Unique Impurity Challenges
- •5.3.2.2 Stability Concerns
- •5.5.2.1 H/H Removal
- •5.5.2.2 HMMS Removal
- •References
- •6.1 Introduction
- •6.2.1 N-Linked Glycosylation
- •6.2.2 O-Linked Glycosylation
- •6.2.3 Glycosaminoglycan Synthesis
- •6.3.1 Mannosylation
- •6.3.2 Fucosylation
- •6.3.3 Galactosylation
- •6.3.4 Sialylation
- •6.5 Glycoengineering
- •6.5.1 Manipulating Heterogeneity
- •6.5.2 Manipulating Sialylation
- •6.5.2.1 Increasing α-2,6 Sialylation
- •6.5.3 Manipulating Fucosylation
- •6.5.4 Manipulating Branching
- •6.6.1 Temperature
- •6.6.2 pH
- •6.6.3.2 Amino Acids
- •6.6.3.3 Glycosaminoglycan Production
- •6.6.4 Culture Additives
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction
- •7.1.1 AAV Gene Therapy
- •7.3.1 Humoral Immunity
- •7.3.2 Cell-Mediated Immunity
- •7.4 Conclusion
- •References
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.2 mRNA Vaccines
- •8.2.1 Background
- •8.2.2 Production Process
- •8.2.2.2 Production
- •8.4.1 Background
- •8.4.2 Production Process
- •8.4.2.2 Production
- •8.4.2.3 Viral Inactivation
- •8.5 Protein-Based Vaccines
- •8.5.1 Background
- •8.5.2 Production Processes
- •8.5.2.1 NVX-CoV2373 (Novavax)
- •8.3 Viral Vectors
- •8.3.1 Background
- •8.3.2 Production Process
- •8.3.2.2 Production
- •8.4 Whole Inactivated Virus Vaccines
- •8.5.2.2 CoVLP (Medicago)
- •8.5.2.3 EpiVacCorona (Vector Institute)
- •8.7 Conclusions
- •References
- •9. CAR-T Bioprocessing
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.2.1 Introduction
- •9.2.2 Lentiviral Vector Design
- •9.2.5 Upstream Bioprocessing
- •9.2.6 Downstream Bioprocessing
- •9.3 Cell Product Bioprocessing
- •9.3.1 End-to-End Systems
- •9.3.4 Activation
- •9.3.6 Cell Expansion
- •9.3.8 T-Cell Cryopreservation
- •References
- •10.1.1 What Is CRISPR?
- •10.1.4 Mechanism Behind CRISPR Gene Editing
- •10.2.1 Creating Gene Knockouts
- •10.2.2 Creating Gene Knock-Ins
- •10.2.4 CRISPR Screens
- •10.3.1 Derivative Technologies
- •10.4.2 Delivery Methods
- •10.6.2 TCR Engineered T Cell Therapy
- •10.6.3 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy
- •10.9.2 Safety Considerations
- •References
- •11.1 Introduction
- •11.1.2 Categories
- •11.2 Current Status
- •11.2.1 Approved Products
- •11.2.2 Market
- •11.3 Design
- •11.3.1 Building Blocks
- •11.3.2 Linkers
- •11.3.3 Oligomerization
- •11.3.3.1 Monomer
- •11.3.3.2 Dimer
- •11.3.3.3 Trimer
- •11.3.3.4 Tetramer
- •11.3.3.5 Pentamer
- •11.3.3.6 Hexamer
- •11.3.3.7 Octamer
- •11.3.4 Orientation
- •11.3.5 Protein Engineering
- •11.3.6 Immunogenicity
- •11.4 Manufacturing
- •11.4.1 Upstream
- •11.4.2 Downstream
- •11.4.3 Glycosylation
- •11.4.4 Aggregation
- •11.4.5 Analytics
- •11.5 Therapeutic Concepts
- •11.5.1 Half-Life Extension
- •Albumin Fusions
- •Fc Fusions
- •Transferrin Fusions
- •Repetitive Peptide Fusions
- •Glycosylated Peptides
- •11.5.1.3 Aggregate Forming Peptides
- •11.5.2 Targeting Functions
- •11.5.3.1 Fc Domain Receptor-Mediated Toxicity
- •11.5.3.2 Toxins
- •11.5.3.3 Immunocytokines
- •11.5.3.4 Human Enzymes
- •11.5.3.5 Apoptosis Induction
- •11.6 Summary
- •11.7 Future Perspectives
- •References
- •12.1 Introduction
- •12.2 ADC History
- •12.3 Target Selection
- •12.4 Antibody Selection
- •12.6 ADC Technology
- •12.7 ADC Clinical Development
- •12.8.1 Mylotarg
- •12.8.2 Adcetris
- •12.8.3 Kadcyla
- •12.8.4 Besponsa
- •12.8.5 Polivy
- •12.8.6 Padcev
- •12.8.7 Enhertu
- •12.8.8 Trodelvy
- •12.8.9 Blenrep
- •12.8.10 Zynlonta
- •12.8.11 Tivdak
- •12.9 Concluding Remarks
- •References
- •13.1 Introduction
- •13.2 Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin
- •13.3 Gemtuzumab Antibody
- •13.4 Calicheamicin
- •13.7.3 Isolation of N-Acetyl Calicheamicin
- •13.10 Conclusions
- •References
- •14.1 Introduction
- •14.2.1 Antibody Generation
- •14.3.1 Structure Prediction
- •14.3.2 Biophysical Properties
- •14.3.3 Hydrophobicity
- •14.3.5 Isoelectric Point (pI)
- •References
- •15.1 Introduction
- •15.2 ADA Program Development
- •15.2.3 Project Approach
- •15.2.4 Model Library
- •15.3 Case Study
- •15.3.3 Hypothesis Generation
- •15.3.5 Feature Engineering Example
- •15.3.7 Model Insights
- •References
- •16.1 Introduction
- •16.1.1.1 United States
- •16.1.1.2 European Union
- •16.1.2 Global Markets
- •16.4.1 United States FDA
- •16.4.2 European Medicines Agency (EMA)
- •16.4.3 The World Health Organization
- •References
- •17.1 Introduction
- •17.3.1.2 Clone Selection

320
S. R. Schmidt
pulmonary delivery is desired. There have been extensive studies on monomeric
erythropoietin (EPO) Fc fusion that exerted a twofold higher afnity to the FcRn
and a 30% better half-life than the dimeric variant [134].
Conformational stability is often pH dependent. In the case of Orencia®, which
consists of the Fc portion of IgG1 and the soluble portion of the T-cell receptor
CTLA-4, destabilization of the CH2 domain can lead to aggregation [119].
Therapeutic peptides suffer from a fast renal clearance due to their small size and
could, therefore, benet from fusion to a larger protein such as the Fc domain. Their
typical half-lives are in the minutes range, so any improvement will be helpful. One
example from that group is Nplate®, a molecule approved for the treatment of
chronic idiopathic (immune) thrombocytopenic purpura with a half-life of 3.5days
in the Fc fusion version. Interestingly the peptide is fused to the C-terminus of Fc.
Cytokines are another therapeutic class of small proteins where Fc-fusion could
contribute to a prolonged circulation. Although there are numerous examples in
clinical studies, there is currently no approved Cytokine fusion available.
Transferrin Fusions
Transferrin (Tf) is one of the ten most abundant serum proteins and delivering iron
from intestine and liver into proliferating cells. As fusion partner, it certainly prevents rapid elimination by renal ltration due to its size of 79kDa. But interestingly
it can also be recycled by receptors as part of its normal function. The observed
half-live of nonglycosylated Tf is 14–17days. In contrast to FcRn recycling, transferrin receptor (TfR) recycling is pH independent. The acidic pH of endosomes
separates iron from Tf, but not Tf from receptors [135]. A transferrin fusion protein
targeting a cell surface receptor rst binds to the fusion partner receptor in the presence of abundant transferrin. After that, secondary binding between Tf and its
receptor can happen. Secondary binding can also occur after endocytosis in the
early endosome. When the fusion protein is attached to the TfR, it stays bound to the
TfR even under acidic conditions and is recycled back to the cell surface [26].
Transferrin-mediated trafcking through endosomes can also support the activation
of protein pro-drugs through proteolysis. This was exemplied with proinsulin–
transferrin fusion that was transformed into active insulin-Tf when incubated with
hepatocytes [136]. In addition to its positive effect on the half-life of fusion proteins, transferrin has another important property. Although iron is essential for nerve
function, it must be balanced to avoid dangerous side effects. Homeostasis is regulated by iron transporters such as TfR at the blood–brain barrier (BBB) between the
blood and the cerebrospinal. Hence, transferrin can serve as vehicle for transport
across the BBB.An early example is nerve growth factor (NGF) fused to transferrin
[137]. However, recent progress focused on the oral bioavailability of transferrin
fusions. Here TfR acts as mediator of transcytosis. Proteins such as G-CSF [138]
pro-insulin [139] or FIX [140] have been fused to Tf and applied orally to rodents
to detect bioactivity in the blood stream of test animals. All three examples could
demonstrate successfully uptake and functionality through oral passage. Interestingly

11 Fusion Proteins: Current Status andFuture Perspectives
321
the protection from acidic stomach uids was primarily achieved through aggregation of the fusion proteins [125]. However, transcytosis was clearly Tf dependent as
the co-administration of free Tf abolished the effect. A crucial element of all
Tf-versions is the linker between Tf and the payload. In the case of FIX fusion, the
traditional exible (G4S)2 proved to have best expression and oral availability [140].
11.5.1.2 Half-Life Extension by Increasing theHydrodynamic Radius
Repetitive Peptide Fusions
As discussed earlier, the duration of circulation in the bloodstream is partly depending on the size of the respective molecule. Small proteins with a hydrodynamic
radius below 60Å are quickly removed by renal ltration. Therefore, concepts for
fusion proteins have been developed using this phenomenon. Most are based on the
addition of peptides (repeats) attached to one or both ends. Ideally the peptides are
uncharged to prevent aggregation, hydrophilic, and lack an ordered structure to generate a cloud like shape with a large radius. The dimension of the cloud is only
dependent on the length of the peptide chain. This phenomenon exists in nature and
is utilized by parasites to increase the bioavailability of virulence factors. This
observation prompted research to develop articial sequences that could be even
more effective. Initial attempts with poly-glycine repeats unfortunately resulted in
limited solubility. To balance that, serine was introduced to improve the hydrophilicity, a fact that is well known from shorter G4S peptide linkers. First studies
involved up to 40 copies of the G4S sequence attached to a Fab fragment. Interestingly
the half-life of that fusion construct was threefold longer than with the Fab alone.
While the mass increased only by 9% due to the additional peptide, the apparent
size determined by size exclusion chromatography was expanded to 120%.
Unfortunately, larger polymers suffered from aggregation and the difculty to generate stable genetic constructs [141]. Stimulated by this observation it was evaluated
if the insertion of proline with its cis/trans isomerization ability could prevent
aggregation. Furthermore, glycine was replaced by alanine. Randomizing the
sequence of the three amino acids further prevents the formation of stable secondary
structure. This technology, called PASylation®, increases the hydrodynamic radius
signicantly when fused to other proteins. PAS sequences are designed to be devoid
of T-cell epitopes and protease recognition motifs. The physicochemical properties
of PAS sequences have been extensively studied. This articial biopolymer represents a strongly hydrophilic and structurally disordered polypeptide with expanded
hydrodynamic volume that closely resembles polyethylene glycol and offers attractive features for the pharmacokinetic modulation of therapeutic proteins [142].
Alternatively, random peptide polymers can be engineered with a larger subset of
amino acids including alanine, glycine, glutamate, proline, serine, and threonine,
but excluding larger, hydrophobic, positively charged or sulfur containing amino
acids. These building blocks were systematically assembled to reveal suitable
sequences that are nonrepetitive and unstructured. The selected candidate

322
S. R. Schmidt
polypeptide called XTEN® contains 864 amino acids and increased the half-life of
Exenatide in mice by a factor of 71 [143]. In contrast to PAS, XTEN® contains
multiple negative charged residues that could lead to repulsion at the glomeruli in
kidney adding another factor that could positively inuence half-life. Unfortunately,
XTEN® effects are not always predictable, as, for instance, glucagon-XTEN exhibited only 15% of the normal potency [144].
In a recent study, both polypeptides, PAS and XTEN®, were compared.
Pharmacokinetic analysis demonstrated a clear linear relationship between serum
half-life and hydrodynamic radius with both polymers. As both fusion partners
behaved quite similar, no inuence of charge on any evaluated parameter could be
proven [145].
Bile salt stimulated-lipase (BSSL), an enzyme that did not reach its primary
endpoint in a phase 3 study, contains 17 repetitive segments of 11 residues
(PVPPTGDSGAP) that are connected to form a continuous domain at the
C-terminus. The peptide is proline rich and O-glycosylated. As part of an digestive
enzyme in fresh breastmilk, it displays improved stability and secretion while being
protected from proteolysis. The 11 residues can be multiplied and the size increase
results in an extended half-life and improved solubility. When fusing 17 repeats to
an Afbody, SEC detected a sixfold larger molecular mass. Pharmacokinetic proles can be ne-tuned by varying the number of repeats. Renal clearance was
slowed more than 100-fold when using 51 repeats.
2
Glycosylated Peptides
Branched glycosylation forms a cloud like structure around proteins. The articial
introduction of glycosyltransferase recognition motifs into the original peptide
sequence can lead to hyperglycosylation as in the case of Aranasep® that had a
threefold longer half-life than the wild-type erythropoietin [146]. Instead of changing the sequence of the target molecule, peptides with multiple glycosylation sites
can be fused at either the N- or C-terminus. The natural carboxyl terminal domain
(CTP) of chorionic gonadotropin (CG) contains 4 O-linked glycosylation sites
[147]. Interestingly, the naked peptide has a molecular mass of 2.9kDa, while the
glycosylated version reaches 8kDa. The versatility of CTP was demonstrated with
human growth hormone hGH in multiple fusion constructs. The most successful
variant with CTP at both termini was fourfold more potent than the hGH alone and
showed a more than ten-fold prolonged half-life (fares 2010). The rst product containing CTP, Elonva®, a follicle stimulant composed of the α subunit of human
follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) was approved in 2010 and allows a once weekly
injection instead of daily administration.
Besides the clinically proven CTP peptide, there have been numerous other
examples described, utilizing increased glycosylation for half-life extension. For
2
Patent: US2021/0284690A1.

11 Fusion Proteins: Current Status andFuture Perspectives
323
instance, the hydroxyproline Hyp-rich repetitive peptide (HypRP) tag that directs
the formation of proline hydroxylation and subsequent Hyp-O-glycosylation in
plant cells has been fused to hGH to obtain a sixfold improved plasma circulation
[148]. Another approach was described for polymers containing the N-linked glycosylation motif Asn-Xaa-Ser/Thr. The so-called Genetic Polymers™ were tested in
as 155 triplet repeats fused to G-CSF, resulting in fourfold extended half-life.
However, neither HypRP nor Genetic Polymers made clinical progress in the
last years.
3
11.5.1.3 Aggregate Forming Peptides
Repeated sequences of other naturally occurring peptides can be found in gelatin
and elastin. Elastin-like peptides (ELPs) were initially applied as a downstream
processing aid due to their unique ability to form aggregates at high temperatures
and convert to soluble monomers at low temperatures. This phenomenon is called a
reversible thermal phase transition, and the critical temperature of the phase transition varies with the length of the polymer. The longer the polymer, the higher the
transition temperature [149]. ELP fusion proteins form a depot in the body where
the active molecule slowly dissociates which represents a totally different mode of
action for half-life extension. Currently, the most advanced candidate drug
Pemziviptadil, called Vasomera™ or PB1046, the fusion between the Vasoactive
Intestinal Peptide (VIP) and ELP, is in clinical phase 2 to be evaluated as treatment
against pulmonary arterial hypertension, allowing once weekly subcutaneous dosing.
Peptide sequences used for half-life extension are collected in Table11.10.
Table 11.10 Peptide fusion-based half-life extension strategies
Mode of action Name Amino acid composition Company
Soluble peptide
polymer
Glycosylation C-terminal
Aggregate forming Elastin like
Xa: any amino acid except P
3
Patent: US2016/0296632A1.
PASylation P, A, S xl-protein
Elvera (PVPPTGDSGAP)
XTENylation P, A, S, E, T, G Amunix (Sano)
[SSSKAPPPSLPSPSRLPGPSD
peptide
Genetic
polymers
peptide
TPILPQ]
G, N, Q & A, S, T, D, E Aequus Biopharma
[VPGXaG]
n
n
n
Swedish Orphan
Biovitrium
Prolor (Opko)
Phasebio

324
S. R. Schmidt
11.5.2 Targeting Functions
Fusion proteins have been used extensively to target their partners to specic organs
or certain cell types. Particularly for cancer therapeutic it is of utmost relevance to
only address malignant cells to avoid unwanted adverse effects. In other cases, like
enzyme replacement therapy it is important not to lose too much of the dose to irrelevant organs. Targeted drug delivery is a very valuable approach, particularly for
large therapeutic molecules, to keep them away from areas in the body where they
are quickly degraded or because systemic distribution might never reach a sufciently efcacious dose. The fusion protein approaches for organ targeting are
exemplied in Fig.11.8.
To get biologics into the brain, the molecules must cross the blood–brain barrier
(BBB). Current strategies comprise primarily receptor-mediated transcytosis (RMT)
via the receptors for insulin (IR) and transferrin (TfR). The most advanced procedure is to shuttle payloads across the BBB with TfR and IR directed antibodies. So
far neurotrophic factors, lysosomal enzymes. and antibodies have been fused to the
molecular Trojan horse (MTH) antibodies [150].
Although liver as the main metabolic organ should be of high interest, not many
successful examples on targeted drug delivery exist. A recent example utilizes transferrin as targeting moiety to get proinsulin as fusion protein to hepatocytes. Overall
this fusion protein showed three distinct effects: TfR-mediated binding and uptake
of the prodrug on the cell surface, liver-specic, TfR-mediated conversion of the
prodrug into its active form, and the bifunctional binding of the active fusion protein
to both Tf and INS receptors in the liver to achieve prolonged retention [151].
The lung can be reached through normal respiration and therefore the focus of
targeting was on pulmonary delivery of biologics. The research focused on utilizing
the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) in lung epithelia. Most of the Fc fusion proteins
were monomeric or asymmetric molecules with the fusion partner just on one of the
Fc heavy chains. For instance, an asymmetric erythropoietin (EPO) Fc fusion exhibited twofold better afnity to the FcRn and a 30% improved half-life than the standard dimeric variant. Compared to the original EPO, monomeric EPO-Fc achieved
Fig. 11.8 Fusion protein-based strategies for organ targeting

11 Fusion Proteins: Current Status andFuture Perspectives
Fig. 11.9 Lung epithelium targeting and translocation of fusion proteins. (a) In cases where pulmonary delivery is impossible, transport to the lung can be facilitated through the polymeric
immunoglobulin receptor (P). It transfers polymeric antibodies like IgA from the basal to the apical side. This passage is essentially irreversible, because the secretory component (SC) to which
IgA is attached to is cleaved from the receptor. (b) The neonatal (N) Fc Receptor binds antibodies,
Fc-fusion proteins (D) or albumin containing formulations. This transcytosis can transfer proteins
bi-directionally and relies on pH dependent binding to N
325
a much higher systemic concentration [134]. Besides the FcRn also the polymeric
immunoglobulin receptor (pIgR) can be the entry point into lung epithelium. pIgR
internalizes and transfers polymeric antibodies (IgA or IgM) from the basolateral to
the apical surface of the cell where the antibodies are released to the lumen. As the
secretory component (SC) to which the polymeric Igs are attached to, is clipped
from the receptor, the transfer is essentially irreversible [152]. A comparison of both
pathways is described in Fig.11.9.
A large constituent of the vertebrate body are bones. There are a number of diseases that affect bones; therefore, targeted therapies for bones are highly relevant.
One of the most recently approved Fc fusion proteins, Strensiq®, represents a bone
targeted tissue-nonspecic alkaline phosphatase (TNALP) to treat hypophosphatasia (HPP). This molecule consists of a truncated TNALP without its hydrophobic
C-terminus connected to an Fc-part and a deca-aspartate sequence (D10) to target
mineralizing tissue [153].
Several enzyme replacement therapies (ERT) must reach an intracellular location to treat lysosomal storage diseases. This is typically achieved by high mannose
glycosylation as a recognition motif for translocation. Instead of modifying the glycosylation, a plant expression system can be used that specically mannosylates
four of the ve potential N-linked glycosylation positions in the b- glucocerebrosidase.
The short C-terminal targeting and retention signal encoding the sequence
DLLVDTM direct the protein to the vacuole. Glucocerebrosidase with terminal
mannose glycans from plants was approved by the FDA under the trade name

326
S. R. Schmidt
Elelyso® 2012 [154]. A similar effect could be achieved with the glycosylationindependent lysosomal targeting (GILT) approach. It utilizes the ability of insulinlike growth factor 2 (IGF-2), to bind to the bifunctional, IGF-2 cation-independent
Man6-P receptor. IGF-2 was truncated to the amino acids 8–67 to prevent binding
to other receptors and was fused to the C-terminal end of β-glucuronidase [155] and
a-glucosidase [156]. Recently antibody-enzyme targeting was applied for ERT [157].
11.5.3 Applications inOncology
Cancer therapeutics represent a signicant portion of current drug discovery
research. A huge variety of different modalities have been evaluated in clinical trials
and every year multiple new molecules are approved for human use. Antibodies
dominate the eld due to their convincing advantages. However, fusion proteins
allow new modes of action that are difcult to achieve by other means. This paragraph summarizes the various approached to eliminate malignant cells by fusion
proteins.
11.5.3.1 Fc Domain Receptor-Mediated Toxicity
Antibodies already represent a “magic bullet” by on the one hand selectively
addressing a molecule through the variable domain and on the other hand triggering
antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) or complement dependent cytolysis (CDC) through the Fc domain [158].
ADCC depletes cells through binding of the antibody to the respective antigen
on the target cell. Then the CH3 domain of the antibody interacts with natural killer
(NK) cells via their CD16 Fc receptor (FcγRIIIa). The cross linking of the CD16
receptors ultimately leads to degranulation at a so-called lytic synapse releasing of
granzyme and perforin to destroy the target cells.
Antibody-dependent cell-mediated phagocytosis (ADCP) is primarily dependent
on FcγRIIa present on macrophages that attack cells marked with antibodies whose
Fc domain can bind that receptor.
CDC is caused by the interaction of the CH2 domain of antibodies with the C1q
complement factor, consisting of six heterotrimeric subunits. That activates a proteolytic cascade, triggering the formation of a membrane-attack complex (MAC)
that generates a transmembrane channel to lyse the cells.
Marking the cell surface of the target cell with C3b as opsonin induces cell killing as well. By the interaction of C3b with its corresponding receptor (C3bR) on
macrophages or NK cells phagocytosis is initiated. This process is called complement-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (CDCC). Additionally, the chemoattractant C5a, facilitating an inammatory response, supports cell killing. An
overview of these activities is displayed in Fig.11.10. Some fusion proteins have
these functions incorporated in their molecular design.

11 Fusion Proteins: Current Status andFuture Perspectives
Fig. 11.10 Fc-domain mediated cytotoxicity. C1q complement factor interacts with the CH2 constant region of an antibody bound to its respective antigen on the surface of a target cell. This
induces the formation of a membrane-attack complex (MAC) that lyses the cell through
complement- dependent cytotoxicity (CDC). Alternatively, C3b that is generated during this cascade facilitates phagocytosis and cytolysis by labelling the cell as opsonin and interacting with the
C3b receptor (C3bR) on a macrophage or natural killer cell. This reaction is called complementdependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (CDCC). Antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC)
is induced through the FcyRIIIa on natural killer cells or antibody-dependent cell mediated phagocytosis (ADCP) by macrophages that additionally contain FcyRIIb
327
11.5.3.2 Toxins
Interestingly the second ever approved fusion protein for cancer application was an
immunotoxin. Since the market introduction of Ontak® in 1999 it took until 2018
to get the next two immunotoxins Lumoxiti® and Elzonris® successfully through
the regulatory process. The toxins derived either from bacteria or plants always
exert their catalytic function inside the cell. Native toxins bind to receptors to be
internalized. To exert their function often they are split by proteases and nally they
have to escape from endosomes to avoid degradation in lysosomes. Instead of the
natural targeting domain a much higher specicity to certain cell types can be
achieved by replacing this domain by antibodies or their fragments that recognize
typical markers of malignant cells. In general, immunotoxins are mainly used for
the treatment of hematological malignancies due to the accessibility of malignant
cells and the immunocompromised state of patients [159]. As natural toxins are

328
S. R. Schmidt
highly immunogenic and would be eliminated fast, site directed mutagenesis is
required to reduce the number of immune response triggering epitopes. The most
frequently used bacterial toxins are Diphtheria toxin (DT) released by gram- positive
aerobic Corynebacterium diphtheria as prototype for ADP-ribosylating toxin, or
Exotoxin A of the aerobic gram-negative bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PE).
The function of both toxins is explained in Fig.11.11.
Fig. 11.11 Mechanism of bacterial toxins utilized in immunotoxin fusion proteins. (a) The
C-terminal lysine (K) of pseudomonas exotoxin is cleaved off by a serum peptidase before internalization through coated pits. Reduction in its disulde bridge and furin cleavage separates binding domain (Ia) from the catalytic domain (III) that is still bound to the translocation domain (II).
In the Golgi apparatus, the exposed REDL-sequence is captured by the KDEL-receptor and the
toxin is shuttled to the endoplasmatic reticulum (ER). There the translocation domain mediates the
escape to the cytosol where it inactivates EF2. (b) After binding to its receptor (R) and cleavage,
diphtheria toxin is internalized. The reduction in the remaining disulde bond separates the binding domain (B) from the catalytic (A) and translocation (T) domain. A pH-induced conformational
change enables the transfer of A and T to the cytosol where A blocks the elongation factor 2 (EF2)

11 Fusion Proteins: Current Status andFuture Perspectives
329
11.5.3.3 Immunocytokines
Besides using nonhuman proteins to eliminate tumors by direct action, malignant
cells can also be destroyed by attracting and stimulating immune cells. To activate
the immune response, certain cytokines can be administered. Unfortunately, systemic administration of cytokines can lead to unwanted side effects, such as fever,
inammation or other u-like symptoms [160]. Therefore, a more targeted approach
is desirable for patient safety. Furthermore, cytokine targeting can also improve the
duration of the cytokine response as the small cytokines are relatively rapidly
removed from the body. Overall, immunocytokines can enrich the cytokine in the
tumor tissue, decrease systemic distribution and, thus, reduce the side effects.
Typically targeting is achieved by fusing the cytokines to full length antibodies,
their Fab- or scFv fragments or other afnity binders. The most frequently used
cytokine is interleukin 2 (IL-2), a signaling molecule that regulates the activity of
lymphocytes. IL-2 triggers the differentiation of T-cells and can induce cell killing
through NK-cells and cytotoxic T-cells. As the high potency of wild-type IL-2 often
overshadows the afnity of the fused antibody, tumor targeting could be limited.
Therefore, IL-2 muteins with reduced binding are becoming the cytokine of choice.
For instance, recently an IL-2 with increased CD122 binding and decreased CD25
binding fused to a tumor specic antibody was designed [161]. A monomeric CEAtargeted IL-2 variant cytokine used a similar approach, weakening CD25 binding to
avoid T-reg activation while improving binding to the CEA antigen [162]. Currently
there are more than ten different IL-2 based immunocytokines in clinical trials,
addressing antigens such as GD2, CD20, EDB, Tenascin C, CEA, FAP, EpCAM, or
D7 [163]. Although the obvious design would place the antibody at the N-terminus
of the fusion protein, while the cytokine is found at the C-terminal end, many other
variants have been developed in the last two decades utilizing both ends or a combination between fusion or the heavy or light chain [164]. Overall three effects of
immunocytokines have to be orchestrated to obtain a long-lasting cure; rst, immune
cells have to inltrate the tumor attracted by chemokine and antibody-mediated
targeting; second, these immune cells must be activated, ideally in a co-stimulatory
way to generate a memory effect; third, tumor-mediated immune tolerance must be
eliminated. All that can be achieved by a careful design of immune modulating
fusion proteins [165].
11.5.3.4 Human Enzymes
A totally different concept of cancer therapy relies on the killing of aberrant cells
through enzymes. Enzymes are not saturated through binding such as antibodies;
therefore, lower doses can be applied, making them attractive therapeutics. Their
activity can be directed either to external or internal targets.
Internal targets for enzymes can be all biological functions which either induce
cell death through apoptosis or that are essential for survival. Many of the toxins
described before address the protein translation, blocking either transcription
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
