Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_32_библиотеки_им_акад_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
22 Мб
Скачать
182 Neurogenic Bladder
https://t.me/medicina_free
and rectum share similar innervation pathways via the sacral nerve roots (S2–S4).
For children experiencing diculty with evacu­ation the initial treatment options include increas­ing dietary ber, fecal soeners, bulking agents such as polyethylene glycol (MiraLAX), oral laxa­tives (bisacodyl), and suppositories. More active measures include conventional enemas, with water or saline- with or without irritant additives to stim­ulate defecation. Commercially available rectal washout systems (e.g. Peristeen) are also available. Alternatively, enemas can be administered into the proximal c olon v ia a catheterizable cha nnel (appen­dicocecostomy) or indwelling caecostomy tube. First described by Malone, this technique (com­monly known as the ACE procedure– antegrade continence enema) has made an important con­tribution to the management of neuropathic bowel dysfunction. Complications of the ACE proce­dure include stomal stenosis and false passage. For many spina bida patients (particularly those with physical disabilities, the practical dicul­ties surrounding the independent management of the neuropathic bowel are oen more challenging than their neuropathic bladder.
KEY POINTS
Children with neurogenic bladder require life-long urologic monitoring because uri­nary tract function can change with time, with adverse consequences for the upper urinary tract and quality of life.
Eighty percent of patients with a neuro­genic bladder will require some form of catheterization (usually clean intermit­tent catheterization) to ensure eective bladder emptying. Depending on their type of neurogenic bladder, CIC may also enable them to achieve a socially acceptable degree of urinary continence.
e urinary tract should be regularly monitored with regular renal and blad­der ultrasound scans and a baseline urodynamic study should be performed in infancy. ereaer, urodynamic stud­ies can either be performed on a regular
(e.g. annual) basis or more selectively according to clinical indications.
Surgical intervention is oen necessary to safeguard renal function, achieve a socially acceptable degree of urinary continence and provide an improved quality of life. When considering whether to recommend surgery and when select­ing the most appropriate procedure(s), clinicians should take account of any co morbidities and the potential long-term consequences of surgery.
SUGGESTED READING
Austin PF, Bauer SB, Bower W, et al: The stan-
dardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function in children and adolescents: update report from the Standardization Committee of the International Children’s Continence Society. J Urol 2014; 191: 1863–1865.e13.
Higuchi TT, Granberg CF, Fox JA, et al:
Augmentation cystoplasty and risk of neo­plasia: fact, ction and controversy. J Urol 2010; 184: 2492–2496.
Husmann DA: Long-term complications follow-
ing bladder augmentations in patients with spina bida: bladder calculi, perforation of the augmented bladder and upper tract deterioration. Transl Androl Urol 2016; 5: 3–11.
McGuire EJ, Woodside JR, Borden TA, et al:
Prognostic value of urodynamic testing in myelodysplastic patients. J Urol 1981; 126: 205–209.
Routh JC, Cheng EY, Austin JC, et al: Design
and Methodological Considerations of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Urologic and Renal Protocol for the Newborn and Young Child with Spina Bida. J Urol 2016; 196: 1728–1734.
Rove KO, Brockel MA, Saltzman AF, et al:
Prospective study of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in children undergo­ing reconstructive operations. J Pediatr Urol 2018; 14: 252.e1–252.e9.
Urologic Anomalies in Anorectal
https://t.me/medicina_free
Malformations and Renal Ectopia
SARAH L HECHT and DUNCAN T WILCOX
Topics covered
14
Classication and workup of anorectal
anomalies Associated anomalies – urogenital, spinal,
syndromes Lower urinary tract dysfunction
ANORECTAL ANOMALIES
Anorectal anomalies comprise a spectrum of con­genital malformations in which the anus fails to open normally on to the perineum. At one end of this spectrum are minor anomalies in which the anal canal is present but the anus is anteriorly dis­placed or covered by perineal skin. With severe mal­formations, the rectum fails to reach the perineum and instead connects to the genitourinary tract.
Incidence and Etiology
Anorectal malformations occur in approximately 1 in 5000 live births, with a slight male to female preponderance of 3 to 2. e embryological cause is incompletely understood but involves failed division of the primitive cloaca. More recent studies indicate that subdivision of the cloaca is a
Outcomes
Renal function Continence Psychosexual
Renal ectopia
largely passive process related to the “unfolding” of the caudal body axis.
Genetic determinants of anorectal anomalies are similarly complex and poorly understood. It is unlikely that the varied spectrum of anorectal malformations will prove to be the outcome of a simple gene mutation, although knockouts of cer­tain genes including ephrin B and Sonic Hedgehog do lead to anorectal anomalies in mice. A high incidence of anorectal malformations has been described in patients with chromosomal abnor­malities, such as Down syndrome, trisomy 18, and cat eye syndrome. Various teratogens have also been associated with anorectal malformations.
Classication
e earliest classication divided anorectal mal­formations into “high” and “low” types based on
183
184 Urologic Anomalies in Anorectal Malformations
https://t.me/medicina_free
Table 14.1 Peña classication of anorectal
malformation
Male Female
Rectovesical stula Cloaca Rectourethral stula >3 cm common channel Prostatic <3 cm common channel Bulbar Rectovestibular stula Imperforate anus
(no stula)
Perineal stula
whether the rectum terminated above or below the levator musculature. A more detailed classi­cation system is based on the location of the rectal stula. (Table 14.1)
Perineal stulae represent minor defects in which the rectum opens anteriorly to the center of the anal sphincter. e orice is usually ste­notic, and the sphincter complex is intact.
Imperforate anus without stula is rare – except in infants with Down syndrome, in whom most anorectal malformations are of the imper­forate anus type. In such cases there is no stula, just a blind-ending rectum that is usually located within 2 cm of the perineal skin. e sacrum is usually well formed and there is a functional anal sphincter complex (Figure 14.1).
A recto-vestibular stula is the most common defect in girls. e rectum opens by a narrowed connection with the vestibule of the vagina, usu­ally at the posterior fourchette.
Figure 14.1 Characteristic appearance of a
perineum in an infant with a low anorectal anomaly. Note the distinct dimple at the site where the anus should be.
Figure 14.2 Perineum of male infant with a
high anorectal malformation with absent anus. Note area of decreased pigmentation at the site where the anus should be.
Rectourethral stulae are the most common defects in males. ere are two types. In the bul­bar type the rectum opens into the anterior (bul­bar) urethra whereas in the prostatic type the rectum opens into the posterior (prostatic) urethra. Prostatic recto urethral stulae are more severe malformations and are accompanied by a higher incidence of sacral dysplasia and poor anal sphinc­ter musculature.
Rectovesical or recto-bladder neck stulae represent the most severe form of high anorectal malformations in boys and are typically associ­ated with sacral dysplasia, abnormal pelvic oor musculature, and a poor anal sphincter complex. is type of malformation is also accompanied by a higher incidence of other coexisting congeni­tal anomalies (Figure 14. 2).
In a persistent cloacal malformation the vagina, rectum, and urethra are combined into a single common channel. In the case of vagi­nal or uterine duplication, the rectum opens in the midline at the conuence of the Müllerian structures. Patients with a long common chan­nel (>3 cm) are more likely to have sacral dyspla­sia and additional congenital anomalies, poor rectal and urinary sphincter musculature. ese patients may require more complex surgical reconstruction including vaginal reconstruction (Figure 14.3).
Associated congenital anomalies / Upper Urinary Tract Anomalies 185
https://t.me/medicina_free
Figure 14.3 Cloacal anomaly with single peri-
neal orice draining the urinary, genital, and lower gastrointestinal tracts in a female infant.
ASSOCIATED CONGENITAL ANOMALIES
Associated Syndromes
VACTERL
VACTERL is an acronym for vertebral anomalies, anorectal anomalies, cardiac anomalies, tracheo­esophageal stula, renal anomalies, and limb
anomalies. Most cases are sporadic rather than hereditary. Not all components of the VACTERL association are expressed in every patient. e most common are vertebral, anorectal, and renal abnormalities.
Caudal regression syndrome
Caudal regression syndrome, also termed sacral agenesis, results from failure of formation of part or all of the coccyx, sacrum, and occasionally the lumbar spine and their corresponding spinal cord segments. It is commonly associated with anorectal malformations (27–48%) and genito­urinary anomalies. Caudal regression syndrome is strongly associated with maternal diabetes; mothers with insulin dependent diabetes are 200–400 times more likely to have a child with caudal regression syndrome than nondiabetic mothers (Fig ure 14.4).
e close embryologic association of the devel­oping anorectal, genital, and urinary systems explains the high incidence of genitourinary anomalies seen in patients with anorectal malfor­mations (Ta ble 14.2).
Table 14.2 Other anomalies associated with
anorectal malformations
Anomaly Incidence (%)
Vertebral 25–40 Cardiac 20
Tetralogy of fallot ASD/VSD
Gastrointestinal 15
Tracheo-esophageal stula Duodenal atresia Hirschsprung’s disease
Genitourinary 60
CHARGE
CHARGE is an acronym for coloboma of the eye, heart anomalies, choanal atresia, growth retarda-
tion, genital, and ear anomalies. In one series of 32 children with CHARGE, the overall incidence of genitourinary tract abnormalities was 69% (Table 14 .3).
Upper Urinary Tract Anomalies
Coexisting anatomical anomalies of the upper and lower urinary tract occur in 50–60% of patients with anorectal malformations, the com­monest being vesicoureteral reux (Figure 14.5). e spectrum of abnormalities encountered in one series of patients is illustrated in Table 14.4 .
In addition to structural anomalies, up to 6% of children develop renal impairment, an incidence which increases to nearly 50% of girls with cloacal anomalies. Consequently, early detection of renal impairment is an important aspect of management.
186 Urologic Anomalies in Anorectal Malformations
https://t.me/medicina_free
Figure 14.4 Plain radiograph demonstrating
sacral agenesis.
Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction
In one series, 25% of children with anorectal malformations were found to have severe lower urinary tract dysfunction which was primarily
Table 14.3 Genitourinary malformations in the
CHARGE association
Incidence (%)
Genital anomalies
Hypospadias/micropenis Undescended testis Vaginal and uterine atresia
Urinary tract anomalies
Duplex kidney Vesicoureteral reux Renal agenesis Hydronephrosis
56
42
Figure 14.5 Coronal view of a distal loopagram.
Contrast passes into the bladder and shows bilat­eral vesicoureteral reux (grade IV on the right).
related to a sacral abnormality. e children with severe bladder dysfunction were mostly incontinent, and one-third had reux nephrop­athy. In addition, 20% of children in this series experienced deterioration of bladder function following surgical repair of the anorectal malfor­mation. ese ndings highlight the importance
Table 14.4 Pattern of structural anomalies of
the urinary tract in 45 children with anorectal malformations
Urinary anomaly Patients (n = 45)
Vesicoureteral reux 16 Hydronephrosis 6 Crossed fused ectopia 3 Dysplastic kidney 3 Bladder diverticulum 2 Renal agenesis 1 Horseshoe kidney 1 Megaureter 1 Prune-belly syndrome 1
of investigating the lower urinary tract in chil-
https://t.me/medicina_free
dren whose anorectal anomaly is accompanied by a sacral abnormality.
Genital Anomalies
Abnormalities of the male external genitalia are commonly present, including undescended testes (20%), bid scrotum (15%), and penile anoma­lies (25%) – including hypospadias and (less commonly) chordee, epispadias, penile dupli­cation, and (rarely) absence of the vas deferens. Anomalies of the female genital tract are less readily apparent, but Müllerian abnormalities, such as vaginal septa or bicornuate uterus occur in 30–45% of girls with anorectal malformations.
Spinal Anomalies
e incidence of vertebral anomalies in children with anorectal malformations has been reported to be as high as 40%. Many children have associated intraspinal pathology (e.g. tethered cord), which can lead to urological, neurological, and orthope­dic complications. It is important to identify cord tethering at an early stage because of the possibil­ity that early neurosurgical intervention may have the potential to avert progressive neurological deterioration. Routine investigation of the spine is required in all patients with anorectal anomalies, with more detailed investigation of the spinal cord being performed where indicated (Figure 14.6). Initial imaging should include both anteroposte­rior and lateral radiological views of the sacrum. e most commonly identied lesions are partial and complete sacral agenesis (Figure 14 .4).
If the sacrum is radiographically normal, signicant intraspinal pathology is unlikely. In infants under 4 months of age, spinal ultrasound has proved very sensitive in identifying intraspi­nal anomalies, although it is less accurate than magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
Initial management and workup 187
Figure 14.6 Diagnostic algorithm for the
investigation of the spine in an infant with an anorectal anomaly.
from the detection of concurrent anomalies – which are more common in severe anorectal malformations. Clues on prenatal ultrasound include dilated bowel, calcied meconium, lack of meconium in the rectum, hydrocolpos (usu­ally identied as a pelvic cystic structure and a poorly visualized bladder), renal anomalies, neural tube defects, and absent radius, among others. Abnormalities of multiple systems may strengthen suspicion for VACTERL or another syndrome with anorectal anomalies. e vast majority of anorectal malformations are still diag­nosed postnatally on physical examination. Initial examination of the perineum will reveal an absent anus but a more detailed evaluation should be undertaken to look for features such as the pres­ence and position of an anal dimple, anal skin tag or membrane, attened buttocks, and gluteal cle. In girls, it is also important to determine whether there are separate urethral and vaginal openings.
DIAGNOSIS
Prenatal diagnosis is largely limited to the more serious anorectal anomalies and usually results
INITIAL MANAGEMENT AND WORKUP
Initial management of the newborn focuses on the gastrointestinal tract. Primary surgical repair can be considered for those infants who pass
188 Urologic Anomalies in Anorectal Malformations
https://t.me/medicina_free
retrograde lling with urine in the obstructed vagina. Historically, hydrocolpos was managed by vaginostomy drainage and/or vesicostomy performed at the time of the diverting colostomy but more recently it has been shown that it hydro­colpos can usually be managed safely by intermit­tent catheterization of the common channel.
Associated Anomalies
In addition to spinal imaging (ultrasound and MRI when indicated) a urinary tract ultrasound scan should be undertaken to evaluate any struc­tural renal anomalies. Renal scintigraphy with 99mTc dimercaptoacetyltriglycine (MAG3) to assess drainage and relative renal function can usually be deferred until >3 months of age to allow time for maturation of renal function. e role of routine preoperative voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) is debatable, and, in practice, it may be dicult to identify a suitable anatomical route to catheterize the bladder.
Figure 14.7 Meconium discharging from the
urethral meatus of a male infant with a rectoure­thral stula. A tract of meconium extending to the perineum would suggest a perineal stula covered with skin. Note also the presence of hypospadias.
meconium via a perineal or rectovestibular s­tula but a diverting colostomy is required in more severe cases where there is no external stula or internal stula to the urinary tract (Fig ure 14.7). Visualizing the passage of meconium can help to identify the location of a stula which is present. But because it can take up to 24 hours for a new­born infant to pass meconium this period should be allowed to elapse before any surgical interven­tion is undertaken. An end colostomy is preferable to a loop colostomy and is typically performed at the level of the descending colon to preserve an adequate length of distal colon for surgical reconstruction.
Hydrocolpos is present in 30% of cases of persistent cloaca and is caused by accumula­tion of secretions, which may be combined with
SURGICAL MANAGEMENT
In general, children undergo denitive repair of their anorectal anomalies at around 3 months of age.
Pre-operative planning includes contrast studies (distal colostogram) to evaluate the length of distal colon available for a pull-through pro­cedure and dene the relationship of the rectum to the sacrum and coccyx. Cystovaginoscopy is an essential part of the preoperative evaluation of cloacal malformations and is ideally undertaken when the diverting colostomy is performed. At the time of endoscopy information should be sought on the length of the common channel, the bladder neck, bladder, and ureteral orices.
A detailed account of the reconstruction of anorectal anomalies is beyond the scope of this chapter. e technique most widely employed is the posterior sagittal anorectoplasty originally described and popularized by Peña (Figu re 14.8). Colostomy closure is usually performed several months following anorectoplasty.
Figure 14.8 Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty.
https://t.me/medicina_free
With the patient prone, the rectum is approached via a sagittal incision. The rectourethral stula is divided and the rectum tailored before being positioned through the levator complex and external sphincter and brought down onto the perineum.
UROLOGIC FOLLOW-UP
Outcomes / Urinary Continence 189
is higher with more severe malformations. In one series, 80% of patients with cloacal anomalies devel­oped long-term renal impairment. Another large review of patients with cloacal anomalies found that half of the patients developed chronic renal failure by 5.7 years of age, and 17% went on to develop end­stage renal failure. Between 2% and 6% of patients with high anorectal malformations die from renal insuciency compared with 1.1% of patients with low lesions. is reects the higher incidence of associated renal anomalies including renal dyspla­sia, reux nephropathy, and bladder dysfunction in those with high anorectal malformations. e man­agement of chronic renal failure and end-stage dis­ease in children with anorectal malformations can be challenging and peritoneal dialysis and subse­quent renal transplantation can be dicult because of the previous abdominal operations.
Routine clinical follow-up (including renal and bladder ultrasound) should be continued until uri­nary continence has been established. Urodynamic studies should be performed post-operatively in all patients to establish baseline bladder function. Urodynamics should be repeated if there are new or worsening urinary symptoms (e.g. leakage, fre­quency, urgency). Further urodynamic evaluation is also required if there are changes in the upper urinary tract (worsening hydronephrosis or dete­riorating renal function) or other signs of neuro­logic deterioration.
Hydronephrosis and vesicoureteral reux should be managed in the same way as for patients without anorectal anomalies. In boys, urinary reux into the vas deferens may also be identied. Unfortunately, this is a risk factor for recurrent epididymo-orchitis, which is common in males with anorectal anomalies and may require occlu­sion of the vas deferens to prevent recurrent epi­sodes of epididymo orchitis.
OUTCOMES
Fecal Continence
Fecal continence aer anorectoplasty depends on the functional integrity of the anal sphincter complex, anorectal sensation, and bowel motility. Patients with severe malformations and associated sacral anomalies have a poorer long-term progno­sis. Fecal continence rates aer reconstructive sur­gery are closely correlated with the location of the rectourinary stula. Whereas the continence rate in patients with a perineal stula is around 90%, the corresponding rates vestibular, bulbar, prostatic and bladder neck stulas are 70%, 50%, 30% and 12% respectively. Persisting fecal incontinence is managed by a combination of enemas and motility agents. Urologists managing these patients should take into account their fecal continence status, as many patients with fecal incontinence are less motivated to become continent of urine and may therefore forgo interventions such as bladder neck reconstruction or closure, which would provide them with a greater degree of urinary continence. Moreover, bowel dysfunction may predispose these patients to recurrent urinary tract infection.
RENAL
Severe and minor anorectal malformations both carry a risk of renal failure, although the incidence
Urinary Continence
While fecal incontinence is primarily a quality of life issue, urinary incontinence may represent
190 Urologic Anomalies in Anorectal Malformations
https://t.me/medicina_free
underlying bladder dysfunction which can lead to renal deterioration and morbidity from uri­nary tract infections. Recurrent urinary tract infection may be overlooked or attributed to coexisting vesicoureteral reux or renal anom­alies, which are prevalent in a high proportion of these children. e importance of lower uri­nary tract evaluation in these patients cannot be overstated. Urinary continence is dependent on the function of both the bladder and the ure­thral sphincter complex. Bladder management focuses on bladder emptying and maintaining low pressures. is may require catheterization, treatment with anticholinergic agents, intravesi­cal injections of botulinum toxin and/or bladder augmentation. In these respects the manage­ment of bladder dysfunction is essentially the same as for neurogenic bladder (see Chapter 13).
Many patients with a cloacal anomaly have a competent bladder neck – which will enable them to remain dry between intermittent catheteriza­tion. By contrast, patients with spinal anomalies more oen have an incompetent bladder neck and sphincter complex with resultant urinary leakage despite optimal bladder management. In these cases, various procedures are available to increase outow resistance including injection of bulking agents and formal bladder neck reconstruction. Bladder neck closure is a further option but this must be accompanied by Mitrofano procedure to create a catheterizable channel for bladder emptying.
ere is relatively limited published informa­tion on urinary continence rates in the anorectal population. A retrospective study of 90 patients in the Netherlands found that nearly all (91%) of anorectal malformation patients with evidence of bladder-sphincter dysfunction on urodynamics had associated urinary incontinence. With only one exception, all these patients had an underly­ing spinal anomaly. A subsequent study of over 300 patients found a correlation between incon­tinence rates and the type of malformation, i.e. cloacal anomalies 46% incontinence rate, bladder neck stula 25%, urethral stula 25%, vaginal stula 20%. In those patients who did not have a stula the urinary incontinence rate was much lower – only 4%.
ADULT OUTCOMES
Very little research has so far been undertaken on sexual function in adults with anorectal malfor­mations. However, they do express an interest in sexuality and sexual function and it is important that these patients receive advice and support from appropriate specialists.
Sex and Fertility
Males
Impaired erectile, ejaculatory, and sensory function have been reported in adult male patients who underwent surgical procedures in the prostatic area at the time of anoplasty. e posterior sagittal approach is thought to be associated with better sexual functional out­comes by reducing the risk of iatrogenic damage to the relevant pelvic innervation. Indeed, one study examining sexual function in 41 males with rectourethral stulae who had been treated by the PSARP procedure found that 90% of these patients had normal erections and ejacu­lation and 80% experienced normal orgasms. Outcomes for sexual function are much less satisfactory in men who underwent abdomino­perineal procedures for the correction of their anorectal anomaly – particularly in those men with associated spinal anomalies. Psychological factors may also contribute to sexual dysfunc­tion even in patients with normally preserved neurologic and anatomical function.
Fertility in these patients has invariably been assessed in relation to paternity but the published literature is very sparse. Infertility or subfertility may be due to cryptorchidism, genital anomalies, sacral anomalies, recurrent epididymo-orchitis, or iatrogenic injuries.
Females
Adolescent females with anorectal malforma­tions who previously underwent surgery which included vaginal reconstruction will require evaluation as they near puberty. It has been
Abnormal migration and fusion of the kidney / Renal Ectopia 191
https://t.me/medicina_free
reported that only one-third of these patients menstruate normally and it is important to ensure that the vagina is not obstructed. ere are reports in the literature of normal preg­nancy in patients with anorectal malformations. However, women with uterine anomalies, such as didelphys are at higher risk for preterm labor and miscarriage. Although some women may be capable of normal vaginal delivery, Caesarian section delivery is necessary in those who have undergone complex vaginal reconstruction or replacement.
Sexual dysfunction appears to be more com­mon in females than in males. One recent study found 50% of women with an anorectal malfor­mation reported sexual dysfunction or distress independent of continence and quality of life. Moreover, 35–45% of female patients surveyed had not been sexually active. Potential problems include inadequate vaginal length or caliber, dyspareunia, poor sensation, and psychosocial distress.
Psychology
Simple ectopic kidney
An ectopic kidney may be located anywhere along the embryological path of ascent from the pelvis to the renal fossa (or rarely, within the tho­rax). Pelvic kidneys are the most common form of renal ectopia, accounting for 60% of all cases. e majority (90%) are unilateral and they occur more commonly on the le. A pelvic kidney is frequently hypoplastic and irregular in shape (Figure 14 .9).
Genital and contralateral urinary abnormali­ties are oen associated with ectopic kidneys and include; absence of the vagina, retrocaval ureter, bicornuate uterus, supernumerary kidney, and
Anorectal malformations carry signicant psychological morbidity which is reected in impaired self-esteem, decreased quality of life, and psychosexual dysfunction. Urinary and fecal incontinence are associated with poorer sexual wellbeing and quality of life. Ongoing multidis­ciplinary care is important for these patients, and ideally this should include the input of a psy­chologist with knowledge of issues facing patients with anorectal anomalies.
ABNORMAL MIGRATION AND FUSION OF THE KIDNEY
Renal Ectopia
Renal ectopia results from abnormal renal migra­tion and/or fusion during embryologic develop­ment. Ectopic kidneys can be classied as simple, horseshoe, or crossed.
Figure 14.9 Intravenous urogram demonstrat-
ing a right pelvic simple ectopic kidney.