Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_32_библиотеки_им_акад_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
22 Мб
Скачать
82 Vesicoureteral Reux
https://t.me/medicina_free
KEY POINTS
VUR is an important cause of morbid­ity in children because of its role in urinary tract infection, pyelonephritis and renal scarring and its association with renal dysplasia.
Reux nephropathy may result from congenital or acquired renal damage ­or a combination of both mechanisms.
VUR is strongly associated with bladder and bowel dysfunction. Management of these conditions is an essential adjunct to management of the VUR itself.
e role of dierent imaging tech­niques for the diagnosis of VUR remains controversial.
Continuous antibiotic prophylaxis signicantly reduces the incidence of symptomatic UTIs in children with VUR but carries a higher risk of induc­ing antibiotic resistant bacteria.
Endoscopic correction and uretero­neocystostomy are eective ways of correcting VUR but may not always prevent the occurrence of further UTIs.
FURTHER READING
Holmdahl G, Brandstrom P, Lackgren G, Sillen
U, Stokland E, Jodal U, et al. The Swedish reux trial in children: II. Vesicoureteral reux outcome. J Urol. 2010;184(1):280–285.
Peters CA, Skoog SJ, Arant BS, Jr., Copp HL,
Elder JS, Hudson RG, et al. Summary of the AUA guideline on management of primary vesicoureteral reux in children. J Urol. 2010;184(3):1134 –1144.
Rivur Trial Investigators, Hoberman A,
Greeneld SP, Mattoo TK, Keren R, Mathews R, et al. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for children with vesicoureteral reux. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(25):2367–2376.
Routh JC, Bogaert GA, Kaefer M, Manzoni
G, Park JM, Retik AB, et al. Vesicoureteral reux: current trends in diagnosis, screening, and treatment. Eur Urol. 2012;61(4):773–782.
Shaikh N, Hoberman A, Keren R, Gotman N,
Docimo SG, Mathews R, et al. Recurrent urinary tract infections in children with bladder and bowel dysfunction. Pediatrics. 2016;137(1).
Skoog SJ, Peters CA, Arant BS, Jr., Copp
HL, Elder JS, Hudson RG, et al. Pediatric Vesicoureteral Reux Guidelines Panel summary report: clinical practice guide­lines for screening siblings of children with vesicoureteral reux and neonates/ infants with prenatal hydronephrosis. J Urol. 2010;184(3):1145 –1151.
Wang HH, Gbadegesin RA, Foreman JW,
Nagaraj SK, Wigfall DR, Wiener JS, et al. Efcacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in chil­dren with vesicoureteral reux: system­atic review and meta-analysis. J Urol. 2015;193(3):963–969.
Upper Tract Obstruction
https://t.me/medicina_free
KIM A R HUTTON and DAVID F M THOMAS
Topics covered
7
Acute and chronic upper tract obstruction Diagnosis Ultrasound Isotope renography
INTRODUCTION
Upper urinary tract obstruction is an extremely important condition in children because it endan­gers renal function, poses a risk of potentially serious urosepsis and can cause distressing symp­tomatology. A high proportion of cases of pos­sible upper tract obstruction are now identied prenatally following the discovery of fetal hydro­nephrosis or hydroureteronephrosis on maternal antenatal ultrasound scans. A substantial part of paediatric urological practice is now concerned with distinguishing between those infants who have signicant obstruction demanding surgical intervention and those who can be safely managed conservatively.
e management of upper tract obstruc­tion has been hindered by the indiscriminate use of terms such as ‘idiopathic hydronephrosis’ and ‘pelviureteric junction (PUJ) obstruction’ or ‘vesicoureteric junction (VUJ) obstruction’
Other imaging and diagnostic modalities Pelviureteric junction obstruction Vesicoureteric junction obstruction
and ‘primary megaureter’ which are oen used interchangeably. e use of other poorly dened terms such as ‘physiological hydronephrosis’ and ‘transient hydronephrosis’ further add to the confusion.
It is important to recognise that ‘hydronephro­sis’ is not a pathological entity in its own right but simply a descriptive term denoting dilatation of the renal pelvis and calyces. Unfortunately, the term hydronephrosis is oen used synonymously with PUJ obstruction. When this is accompanied by dilatation of the ureter the term ‘hydroure­teronephrosis’ is used.
ere are essentially four potential causes of upper tract dilatation:
Urinary tract obstruction
Vesicoureteric reux (VUR)
Developmental anomalies of the upper uri-
nary tract
Pathologically high rates of urine production
(‘ow uropathy’)
83
84 Upper Tract Obstruction
https://t.me/medicina_free
In an attempt to achieve uniformity in the assess­ment of upper tract dilatation and obstruction a new classication was proposed following a multidisciplinary consensus conference held in the United States in 2014.
This classification (which is applicable to
pre- and post-natal assessment) uses the fol­lowing criteria to evaluate the severity and
clinical significance of upper urinary tract dilatation:
1. Anterior-posterior renal pelvic diameter;
2. Calyceal dilatation;
3. Renal parenchymal thickness;
4. Renal parenchymal appearance;
5. Bladder abnormalities;
6. Ureteral abnormalities.
e ndings of preliminary studies appear to validate the predictive value of this classication when applied to the clinical management of pre­natally detected hydronephrosis. However, fur­ther studies are required to establish whether it oers any signicant advantages over previously used scoring systems.
WHAT IS OBSTRUCTION AND HOW IS IT DIAGNOSED?
ere is no universally accepted denition of obstruction nor is there a single investigation which is capable of providing an unequivocal diagnosis of obstruction in a dilated upper uri­nary tract. One widely used denition states that obstruction is any impairment to urine ow which, if le untreated will lead to progressive deterioration of function. However, this is not a very useful denition in clinical practice because it implies that the clinician should wait for evi­dence that the obstruction has caused renal dam­age before taking steps to prevent it. In clinical practice, decision-making is therefore guided by a combination of clinical factors and the evidence of imaging studies.
Acute Obstruction
e pathophysiology of acute obstruction has been studied in experimental animal models. In the rst few hours, a sharp rise in intrarenal pressure is accompanied by a marked reduc­tion in blood ow in the renal cortex. Some equilibration occurs aer 24 hours but without prompt relief of the obstruction, rapid damage to the nephrons supervenes, with loss of approxi­mately 50% of functioning nephrons aer 6 days and irreversible loss of the entire function of the obstructed kidney within 6 weeks. However, acute obstruction is relatively rare in children. Possible causes include: impaction of a urinary calculus at the PUJ, acute PUJ obstruction or VUJ obstruction or early postoperative obstruc­tion following a pyeloplasty or ureteric reimplan­tation which has not been protected by stenting.
Chronic Obstruction
is is encountered far more commonly in chil­dren but the pathophysiology is less well under­stood because of the diculty in creating reliable experimental models.
Historically, it was far easier to justify a deci­sion to intervene surgically because the major­ity of children with upper tract obstruction presented clinically with symptoms such as pain or urinary infection. Following the widespread introduction of antenatal ultrasound it became apparent, however, that the presence of mild to moderate upper tract dilatation is more prevalent in healthy, asymptomatic infants than was previ­ously recognised. Indeed, some degree of dilata­tion of the fetal urinary tract is present in 1-2% of pregnancies. Even when obstruction has been demonstrated by the relevant investigations, the natural history is oen characterised by progres­sive improvement and spontaneous resolution. e challenge is therefore to try to distinguish those infants in whom the dilatation/obstruction is destined to remain stable or resolve without aecting renal function from those with clinically signicant obstruction which is likely to lead to loss of function unless intervention is undertaken to relieve it.
Radiological investigation of upper tract obstruction / Isotope Renography 85
https://t.me/medicina_free
RADIOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION OF UPPER TRACT OBSTRUCTION
With the rare exception of acute obstruction by an impacted calculus, upper tract obstruc­tion always gives rise to dilatation. However, the presence of dilatation does not always signify obstruction. Non-obstructive causes of dilata­tion include; VUR, developmental anomalies such as primary non-obstructive mega ure­ter and residual dilatation which may persist despite relief of obstruction in a previously obstructed system. Pathologically high urine ow, for example in diabetes insipidus, is a rare cause of dilatation.
Ultrasound
e diagnostic pathway usually starts with the ultrasound nding of dilatation (Figure 7.1).
e most valuable measurement derived from an ultrasound scan is the anteroposterior (AP) diameter of the renal pelvis at the renal hilum. In the neonate, this gure should not normally exceed 6 mm. However a diameter of 10 mm is usually taken as the upper limit of normal. Signicant obstruction posing an active threat to renal function is most unlikely to be present if the AP diameter is less than 15 mm. Conversely, an
Figure 7.1 Postnatal ultrasound conrming
antenatal ultrasound appearances of grossly hydronephrotic right kidney with marked dilatation of renal pelvis and calyces with thinned cortex.
AP diameter greater than 50 mm is almost invari­ably associated with impaired function, either at the time of initial assessment or during the course of follow up.
Additional parameters which may increase the sensitivity of ultrasound for the diagnosis of obstruction include calyceal dilatation (central or peripheral), thickness and ultrasound appear­ances of the renal parenchymal thickness and abnormal appearances of the ureters or bladder. e use of Doppler ultrasound has been described for the measurement of renal resistive index and assessment of jets of urine emerging from the ureteric orices. However, this has not proved suciently sensitive to be of diagnostic value in a routine clinical practice.
e presence of ureteric dilatation is always an abnormal ultrasound nding because a ureter of normal calibre cannot be visualised on ultrasound.
Isotope Renography
e central role played by isotope renography in the diagnosis of upper tract obstruction is considered in detail in Chapter 3. In summary, dimercaptoacetyltriglycine (MAG3) labelled with metastable 99-Technetium ( radiopharmaceutical agent of choice.
In addition to quantifying dierential func­tion, dynamic renography provides serial gamma camera images of the kidneys and urinary tract and generates a graphic display of the uptake and clearance of the isotope from the kidneys over time. e use of dimercaptosuccinic acid ( DMSA) is largely conned to assessing low levels of dierential function when deciding between pyeloplasty and nephrectomy.
Diuresis renography provides a means of distinguishing between obstructed and non­obstructed dilatation.
e characteristics of the uptake and drainage curves, oen referred to as the O’Reilly curves, fall into ve well-recognised patterns (Fi gu re 7.2):
Type 1. Normal uptake with prompt washout
Type 2. Rising uptake curve; no response to
diuretic (obstruction)
99m
Tc) is currently the
99m
Tc
86 Upper Tract Obstruction
https://t.me/medicina_free
Type 1 and type 3a curves are normal and non­obstructed. However, interpreting the clinical signicance of type 2, type 3b and type 4 curves in children can oen be more problematic.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can combine the anatomical information yielded by ultrasound with much of the functional information provided by renal scintigraphy. It has the advantage of provid­ing anatomical and functional information in a single study without exposure to ionising radia­tion. e main drawback is the requirement for general anaesthesia or sedation in infants and younger children – although a ‘feed and wrap’ technique can be used in small infants.
e anatomical detail provided by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI is excellent (Fi g u r e 7.3). In many centres dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI is replacing ultrasound and isotope as a ‘one
Figure 7.2 Patterns of isotope renogram curves,
as classied by O’Reilly and associates.
Type 3a. Initially rising curve, which falls rapidly in response to diuretic (non-obstruc­tive dilatation)
Type 3b. Initially rising curve, which neither falls promptly nor continues to rise (equivocal)
Type 4. ere is a secondary peak suggesting obstruction precipitated by high urinary ow rates – the so-called Homsy’s sign. Similar ndings can be observed in patients with high grade VUR and no obstruction
Figure 7.3 Contrast-enhanced MR scan demon-
strating bilateral obstruction.
Radiological investigation of upper tract obstruction / Integrated Approach to Diagnostic Imaging 87
https://t.me/medicina_free
the United Kingdom but may still play a limited role – for example in identifying rare cases with obstruction at more than one level in the ureter.
Antegrade Pyelography
This contrast study, which is performed via ultrasound guided puncture of the kidney can be valuable for demonstrating obstruc­tion distal to the PUJ and in cases of suspected recurrent PUJ obstruction following previous
Figure 7.4 CT scan showing a horseshoe kidney
with bilateral hydronephrosis due to bilateral PUJ obstruction. The isthmus can be seen crossing the abdominal aorta.
pyeloplasty.
Integrated Approach to Diagnostic Imaging
stop shop’ imaging modality for the assessment of upper tract obstruction in children.
Computerised Tomography
Although not suitable for the routine assess­ment of upper tract obstruction in children, non­contrast and contrast-enhanced computerised tomography (CT) may be indicated in children presenting with obstruction due to calculi. CT may also be helpful delineating complex anatomy and aberrant renal vasculature – for example, horseshoe kidney (Fig ure 7.4). However, MRI has largely superseded CT in such cases.
Intravenous Urography
Intravenous urography (IVU), once the standard investigation for suspected upper tract obstruc­tion, is now rarely used in children because the relevant functional and anatomical information can provided more accurately by other imaging modalities.
Retrograde Pyelography
is investigation entails cystoscopic catheterisa­tion of the ipsilateral ureteric orice and injection of X ray contrast to outline the upper urinary tract from below. It is not routinely performed prior to pyeloplasty by paediatric urologists in
e aims of imaging are as follows:
To determine whether the dilatation is genu-
inely due to obstruction.
To establish the precise level of obstruction
To measure dierential renal function
To assess the potential for recovery in poorly
functioning kidneys
To manage complications arising from infec-
tion in an obstructed system
Isotope renography is the principal investiga­tion used to conrm or refute the diagnosis of obstruction but other imaging modalities may be needed to exclude reux and non-obstructive dilatation. Renal ultrasound will usually provide adequate information on the level of obstruction. When this is unclear MRI is the investigation of choice, supplemented by antegrade or retrograde pyelography in dicult cases.
Dierential renal function can usually be reli­ably assessed by MAG3 renography or dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. However, in poorly functioning kidneys
99m
Tc DMSA isotope scin­tigraphy provides more accurate information and serves as a more reliable predictor of potential recovery of function. When percutaneous neph­rostomy (PCN) has been performed to drain an infected/obstructed kidney, measurement of dif­ferential function (usually with
99m
Tc DMSA) should ideally be delayed until aer 3–4 weeks of drainage.
88 Upper Tract Obstruction
https://t.me/medicina_free
PELVIURETERIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION
PUJ obstruction is characterised by impairment of urine transport across the pelviureteric junc­tion leading to elevated renal pelvic pressures, dilatation of the proximal collecting system and the potential for nephron loss. It is a het­erogeneous condition with a number of dierent causes and considerable variability in severity, clinical features, presentation and natural his­tory. Estimates derived from antenatal screen­ing place the incidence of PUJ obstruction in the range 1:750–1:1000. However, PUJ obstruction can also occur de novo as an acquired condition in older children.
e male to female ratio is approximately equal and the le kidney is more commonly aected than the right, by a ratio of approximately 2:1.
PUJ obstruction is associated with an increased incidence of other urinary tract anom­alies such as:
Multicystic dysplastic kidney (MCDK)
Horseshoe kidney
Ectopic kidney
Duplex collecting systems (usually the lower
moiety is aected)
Aetiology of PUJ Obstruction
Although the ndings on diagnostic imaging, notably MRI, oen provide a guide to the likely aetiology it is not usually until the time of opera­tion that this can be established with certainty.
e causes of PUJ obstruction can be classied
as follows:
Intrinsic obstruction (Figure 7.5a)
Typically, this comprises a short stenotic seg­ment at the PUJ. However, in some cases, this
may extend distally to involve a more extensive segment of proximal ureter. Although physical obstruction appears to play the most important role in children, functional obstruction due to an ‘adynamic segment’ is very occasionally impli­cated as the likely cause. A number of histological abnormalities of smooth muscle and collagen have been reported and innervation abnormalities with reduced neural density and abnormalities of the interstitial cells of Cajal have also been described.
Extrinsic obstruction
Aberrant ‘crossing’ lower pole vessels are found in more than 30% of older children and adults undergoing pyeloplasty.
Figure 7.5 Aetiology of PUJ obstruction. (a) Intrinsic stenosis. Obstruction due to narrowing of
a segment of ureter which is usually localised to the region of the pelviureteric junction but may extend over a length of several centimetres. (b) Ureteric folds. Tortuous segment of proximal ureter giving rise to varying degrees of obstruction. Straightening of this segment with growth may explain the spontaneous resolution of obstruction observed in a proportion of prenatally detected cases. (c) Extrinsic obstruction by crossing lower pole vessels.
Pelviureteric junction obstruction / Variants of PUJ Obstruction 89
https://t.me/medicina_free
In some cases, the presence of these vessels appears to be simply incidental to an intrinsic PUJ obstruction. However, in many cases, particularly older children presenting with intermittent loin pain, it is clear from the operative ndings that the aberrant vessels are directly responsible for external compression and obstruction at the level of the pelviureteric junction. In suitably selected cases laparoscopic transposition of the lower pole vessels can successfully relieve the obstruction without the requirement for any surgical proce­dure on the pelviureteric junction itself.
In infants with prenatally detected PUJ obstruction, however, lower pole vessels account for less than 5% of cases requiring pyeloplasty.
In some cases the PUJ itself is normal in calibre but the proximal ureter is tortuous and obstructed by the presence of kinks and folds (Fi gure 7. 5b). Overlying bands and adhesions may also be present. is variant of PUJ obstruction may have the potential to resolve spontaneously as the proximal ureter straightens with growth.
Intraluminal obstruction
A urinary tract stone which originated within the kidney may become impacted at the PUJ to cause acute or acute -on- chronic obstruction. Other causes include: broepithelial polyps arising from the renal pelvis (Fig ure 7.6 ), and mycelial balls resulting from fungal urinary tract infection – typically with Candida albicans (Figure 7.7).
High insertion of the pelviureteric junction
In cases where the PUJ is found to be high on the anterior wall of the dilated renal pelvis this is generally regarded as being a secondary phenom­enon (upwards displacement of the PUJ due to progressive dilatation of the pelvis) – rather than the primary cause of obstruction.
Variants of PUJ Obstruction
Horseshoe kidney
e majorit y of horseshoe kidneys remain asymp­tomatic and do not cause urological problems.
Figure 7.6 PUJ broepithelial polyps. Operative
ndings at open surgery in an 11-year-old boy presenting with loin pain. Preoperative imaging with ultrasound and isotope renography had shown hydronephrosis with obstruction at the PUJ. The intraluminal polyps, which resembled ‘a bunch of grapes’, were an unexpected nd­ing on opening the ‘bulky’ upper ureter/PUJ region. Resection of all polyps together with an Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty successfully relieved his symptoms and the obstruction. (Reprinted from paediatrics and child health, volume 18, edition 6, Kim A R Hutton and Ram Shrestha, surgical management of renal tract problems, page 260, Copyright 2008, with permission from Elsevier.)
e commonest complication is obstruction – which may be caused by the deviated course of the proximal ureter over the renal isthmus or, more commonly, by extrinsic compression by aberrant vasculature. On rare occasions a con­stellation of renal pathology can be encountered in the same patient – such as a horseshoe kidney,
90 Upper Tract Obstruction
https://t.me/medicina_free
Figure 7.7 Renal fungal balls causing PUJ
obstruction. A neonate born prematurely at 27 weeks gestation suddenly became completely anuric during the course of his intensive care treatment. A renal ultrasound showed marked bilateral hydronephrosis and echogenic material obstructing both PUJs. The patient required bilateral PCN inser­tion. In this right nephrostogram study a fungal ball can be seen obstructing the PUJ. The fungal balls and candida infection were successfully treated with the patient making a full recovery. (Reprinted from Paediatric Surgery International, Volume 20, Edition 10, R. Babu and K A R Hutton, Renal fungal balls and pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction in a very low birth weight infant: treatment with streptokinase, page 805, Copyright 2004, with permission from Springer Nature.)
renal duplication, and lower pole PUJ obstruction (Figure 7.8).
Retrocaval ureter
is rare anomaly, which more commonly aects the right ureter, originates from abnor­mal development of the posterior cardinal veins, the precursors of the inferior vena cava. Further investigation by MRI is indicated if this diagnosis is suggested by the ultrasound ndings. A laparo­scopic or robotic-assisted approach to treatment is preferable to open surgery.
Reux in association with PUJ obstruction
Severe tortuosity and kinking of the proximal ureter associated with high grade VUR (e.g. grades IV and V) can sometimes give rise to xed obstruction to the drainage of urine from the kid­ney. e diagnosis is conrmed by performing MAG3 renography with a catheter in the bladder to ensure that isotope does not reux back to the kidney to interfere with interpretation of the nd­ings. Antegrade pyelography may also be diagnos­tic. Depending on clinical factors the management options include conservative management, pyelo­plasty (possibly combined with ureteric reimplan­tation), and ureteric reimplantation alone. It has been argued that pyeloplasty and ureteric reim­plantation should not be performed simultane­ously for fear of compromising the blood supply to the ureter. However, this appears to be a largely theoretical risk and in practice the two procedures can be safely combined if necessary.
Although primary ureteric reimplantation can be expected to correct the reux it oen fails to alleviate the secondary obstruction – thus neces­sitating a subsequent pyeloplasty.
Natural History of PUJ Obstruction
is is very variable, ranging from complete reso­lution to rapidly increasing obstruction causing deterioration in renal function. In a substantial proportion of cases the obstruction, whilst persist­ing, nevertheless remains stable for many years, with little or no impact on renal function. e later
Presentation 91
https://t.me/medicina_free
Figure 7.8 Bilateral renal duplication within a horseshoe kidney with left lower pole PUJ obstruction.
This 5-year-old girl was referred with increasing left loin pain following conservative management of a prenatally detected uropathy. (a) Contrast CT image showing both upper poles. (b) Image show­ing the functioning right lower pole, ‘chunky’ isthmus and grossly hydronephrotic, non-functioning left lower pole. A left lower pole heminephrectomy with division of isthmus tissue overlying the aorta resulted in complete relief of her symptoms.
onset of PUJ obstruction in a previously normal kidney may be associated with aberrant lower pole vessels rather than intrinsic stenosis (Figure 7. 9).
PRESENTATION
Prenatal detection: PUJ obstruction is the most common clinically signicant uropathy detected during pregnancy. However, mild to
moderate degrees of PUJ obstruction may not be present or may not yet have given rise to detectable dilatation at the time when routine fetal anomaly scans are performed in the second trimester. Such cases either remain undetected or are only detected if additional scans are per­formed later in pregnancy. e severity of dilata­tion (AP diameter of the renal pelvis) is a more accurate predictor of functional impairment than the gestational age at which dilatation was rst detected.