Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_32_библиотеки_им_акад_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
22 Мб
Скачать
https://t.me/medicina_free
8
https://t.me/medicina_free
Duplication Anomalies, Ureteroceles and Ectopic Ureters
PARVIZ HAJIYEV and BERK BURGU
Topics covered
Classication Embryology Pathology and denitions
INTRODUCTION
Complete or partial duplication of the upper urinary tract is a relatively common congenital anomaly with autopsy and radiological data indi­cating an overall incidence of the order of 1–3%. e most common form is partial (incomplete) duplication, in which two ureters emerge sepa­rately from the kidney but then converge to form a single ureter draining via a single ureteric ori­ce. Partial forms of duplication rarely give rise to clinical problems and may be picked up as an incidental nding during urological investigation for unrelated symptoms.
Complete forms of duplication are character­ized by two separate collecting systems in the duplex kidney with ureters which remain sepa­rate throughout their length, entering the lower urinary tract via two separate ureteric openings.
Investigations Management
Complete duplication is much rarer, occurring in less than 1% of individuals, mainly females. Unlike partial duplication, complete duplication anomalies are oen of clinical signicance. ey may be associated with a range of symptoms and complications including urinary tract infection, urinary incontinence, bladder outow obstruc­tion and functional renal damage. Duplication occurs bilaterally in 40% of cases but the ana­tomical pattern is oen dierent between the two upper tracts.
Complete duplication is frequently detected on routine prenatal ultrasound screening but further evaluation with diagnostic imaging is required postnatally. Clinical presentations include urinary tract infection, urinary incontinence, obstructed voiding, pain and urolithiasis.
Upper tract duplication has a familial ten­dency and there is an incidence of 8% in close relatives.
103
104 Duplication Anomalies, Ureteroceles and Ectopic Ureters
https://t.me/medicina_free
EMBRYOLOGY
is is considered in Chapter 1 but can be briey summarized as follows:
During the fourth week of gestation the ure­teral bud branches o from the mesonephric duct and advances toward the metanephric blas­tema to initiate development of the embryonic kidney from around 32 days. A single ureteral bud will usually induce normal nephrogenesis and give rise to a single renal pelvis and normal calyces. Division (bifurcation) of the ureteral bud before it enters the metanephros results in partial duplication – with the ureteral anatomy being determined by the level of bifurcation. Complete duplication occurs when the meso­nephric duct gives rise to two separate ureteral buds which each make contact with the meta­nephric blastema (Figure 8.1). A ureteral bud derived from an aberrant (ectopic) position on the mesonephric duct is more likely to pen­etrate and abnormal part of the metanephric blastema – resulting in defective nephrogenesis and renal dysplasia.
In complete forms of duplication the more caudal of the two ureteral buds (draining the lower pole of the kidney) has a tendency to open in a superior and lateral position in relation to the trigone. is may result in a shorter intramural course of the distal ureter in the bladder predis­posing to reux into the lower pole moiety of the duplex kidney.
Paradoxically, the ureter draining the upper pole moiety invariably drains in a more distal (caudal) position in the urinary tract than the lower pole ureter. is characteristic feature of the ureteral anatomy in upper tract duplication is described a s the Meyer-Weigart law. In females, an ectopic upper pole ureter may enter the lower uri­nary tract at the bladder neck or more distally at a level below the bladder neck and striated sphinc­ter muscles. In the most severe forms of ectopia, the ureter opens at the introitus or drains into the vagina. In males, however, an ectopic upper pole ureter always drains at a supra sphincteric level, typically connecting with the vas, seminal vesicle or ejaculatory duct. e embryological origin of ureteroceles remains poorly understood.
Figure 8.1 Embryological origins of complete
duplication. (a) Accessory ureteral bud (blue) arising in an abnormally cephalad position on the mesonephric duct (green). (b) By 12 weeks the upper pole ureter has been carried with the mesonephric duct to an abnormally distal ecto­pic location. The more caudal ureteral bud (red) may become incorporated into a superolateral position on the trigone, with a short submuco­sal tunnel predisposing to reux. The relative positions of the ureteral orices on the trigone are also illustrated. The characteristic anatomical patter of duplex ureters is dened by the Meyer­Weigart law.
CLASSIFICATION
Upper tract duplication is subdivided into
Complete duplication
Partial duplication
Classication / Ureteroceles 105
https://t.me/medicina_free
e anomalies associated with complete duplica­tion include
Upper pole: ureterocele, ectopic ureter, upper
pole renal dysplasia
Lower pole: vesicoureteral reux
e anomalies associated with partial duplication include
Pelvi ureteric junction obstruction (lower pole)
“Yo yo” reux between the two ureters above
their point of convergence. However, this
is a doubtful clinical entity in children of
unknown clinical signicance
Ureteroceles (Figure 8.2)
ese are classied as
Intravesical (entirely within the bladder)
Extravesical or ectopic (ie, a portion extends beyond and below the bladder neck into the urethra)
A ureterocele is dened as a cystic dilation of the intravesical segment of the distal ureter. e overall incidence of duplex system ureteroceles is 0.02% – with the majority (80%) occurring in females. e renal cortex drained by a ureter
Figure 8.2 Ureteroceles. (a) Cystic dilatation of upper ureteral bud with aberrant interaction with the
metanephric blastema leading to (b) duplex ureterocele and dysplastic upper pole moiety. (c) Single system orthotopic ureterocele. (d) Duplex ectopic ureterocele. (e) Large prolapsing caecouretrocele extending down between the decient trigone and urethra anteriorly and vagina posteriorly.
106 Duplication Anomalies, Ureteroceles and Ectopic Ureters
https://t.me/medicina_free
terminating in a ureterocele is oen dysplastic and the ureter and upper pole collecting system are dilated (hydronephrotic). A ureterocele may lie entirely within the bladder, in which case it is unlikely to interfere with voiding and urinary continence. However, up to 50% of duplex ure­teroceles are termed “ectopic” because they extend extravesically and encroach upon the bladder out­let and proximal urethra. e largest variety is the caeco ureterocele, which extends further down into the urethra and may appear as a cystic mass in perineum by the external urethral meatus. Ectopic ureteroceles can cause bladder outow obstruction giving rise to voiding dysfunction and elevated intravesical pressure – which may have the potential to cause obstructive damage to the contralateral kidney. Elevated intravesical pressure caused by a prolapsed ectopic ureterocele may also exacerbate any existing vesicoureteral reux (VUR) into the ipsilateral lower pole.
e majority of infants with duplex system ureteroceles are now identied by prenatal ultra­sonography. In infants in whom the abnormality has not been identied prenatally, the most com­mon clinical presentation is with urinary tract infection in the early months of life.
Less frequently, the condition presents with symptoms of voiding dysfunction and outow obstruction. Although rare, prolapsed ectopic ure­terocele is nevertheless the most frequent cause of urethral obstruction in girls and may occasionally be accompanied a visible cystic swelling.
In addition to symptoms caused by outow obstruction, other symptomatic presentations in older infants and children include febrile or non­febrile urinary infections, failure to thrive and recurrent abdominal/pelvic pain. Duplication may rarely present with urolithiasis secondary to infection and obstruction.
Whereas the majority of ureteroceles occur in duplex systems, approximately 10% of uretero­celes are associated with a single (non-duplex) upper urinary tract. ese ureteroceles (termed “orthotopic” or “single system”) are almost always intravesical and do not interfere with voiding. Dilatation of the ipsilateral ureter and upper tract is only of mild or moderate severity and function in the ipsilateral kidney is usually either normal or only mildly impaired.
ECTOPIC URETER
is is dened as ureter which enters the urinary tract in a more caudal position than the normal point of entry on the trigone. e estimated inci­dence is 0.01% and it occurs mostly in females – in whom the ectopic ureter may open into the ure­thra, vagina or, very rarely, the cervix or uterus. In males, an ectopic duplex ureter may drain into the proximal urethra, ejaculatory duct or seminal vesicles.
Depending on the level at which the ectopic enters the lower urinary (or genital) tract in rela­tion to the sphincter complex it is dened as being either supra sphincteric or infra sphincteric.
Supra Sphincteric Ectopic Ureter
Because aected children are continent the diagnosis is usually made following the nd­ing of dilatation of the upper pole ureter and/ or collecting system on routine prenatal screen­ing or during the investigation of urinary tract infection.
Infra Sphincteric Ectopic Ureter (Figure 8.3)
As with supra sphincteric forms of ectopic ure­ter, this anomaly may be identied following the discovery of dilatation on prenatal ultrasound screening. Alternatively, it may come to light during investigation of urinary tract infection or symptoms. e classic symptomatic presenta­tion is with constant dribbling of urine which is superimposed upon an otherwise normal pattern of voiding and urinary continence. In theory, this characteristic pattern should serve to distin­guish ectopic ureter from other causes of urinary incontinence but in practice the clinical picture may be less diagnostic. For example, some girls remain dry overnight when lying horizontally and others may experience pooling of urine in the vagina which may enable them to remain relatively dry for variable periods during the day­time. e picture may also be complicated if the girl also suers from wetting due to dysfunctional voiding – as well as experiencing urinary leakage
Ultrasonography 107
https://t.me/medicina_free
during postnatal evaluation of prenatally detected cases or during the investigation of urinary tract infection.
COMPLICATIONS OF PARTIAL DUPLICATION
e term “Yo Yo” reux is applied to the possible crossow of urine between the two ureters of a partial duplication (limbs of a Y) above their con­vergence to form a single ureter. Although, pos­tulated as a possible cause of loin pain in adults there is no evidence that it causes any symptoms in children. Pelvi ureteric junction obstruction in duplex systems almost invariably occurs in the lower pole of a partial duplex kidney (bid pelvis).
INVESTIGATION
Figure 8.3 Diagrammatic representation of infra
sphincteric ectopic ureter.
from the ectopic ureter. Finally, small volumes of urine collecting in the vagina may become infected and present as a vaginal discharge – a relatively common symptom in girls which does not usually merit imaging of the urinary tract.
Physical examination is rarely conrmatory and the diagnosis is based on the characteristic pattern of the incontinence and the ndings of imaging studies. Because duplication is com­monly bilateral the presence of a complete or par­tial duplex system on one side should always raise suspicion of a contralateral duplex system with an occult upper pole and ectopic ureter.
VESICOURETERAL REFLUX
Complete duplication is accompanied by VUR into the ipsilateral lower pole ureter in approxi­mately 50% of cases. is is usually identied
During the physical examination the external genitalia and urethral orice should be inspected, looking for dampness in the region of the introi­tus. Very occasionally a bulging ureterocele can be observed (Figure 8.4).
ULTRASONOGRAPHY
Using ultrasound, it is possible to assess the dis­tribution and severity of dilatation (hydro ureter
Figure 8.4 Prolapsed ureterocele emerging at
the introitus of a neonate.
108 Duplication Anomalies, Ureteroceles and Ectopic Ureters
https://t.me/medicina_free
Figure 8.5 Bladder ultrasonography demon-
strating large ureterocele and dilated upper pole ureter behind the bladder.
and hydronephrosis) and the appearances of the renal parenchyma in the upper and lower poles of both kidneys. A ureterocele can almost always be visualized on ultrasound, providing the blad­der is full (Figure 8.5). Likewise, an ectopic ureter which is dilated can be visualized lying behind the bladder. However, cases of “cryptic duplica­tion” may be missed on ultrasound because the upper pole is small and dysplastic and the ectopic ureter is not dilated and not readily detectable on ultrasound.
RADIONUCLIDE SCAN
Functional imaging with cinic acid (DMSA) scintigraphy is performed to assess the distribution of function between the two kidneys and between the upper and lower pole moieties of a duplex kidney (Figure 8.6).
99m
Tc DMSA can also help to identify an occult duplex system by demonstrating poorly func­tioning dysplastic upper pole parenchyma associated with an infra sphincteric ectopic ureter. Dynamic renography with has the advantage of providing information on drainage as well as dierential function but is less accurate than dierential function in the two moieties of a duplex kidney.
99m
Tc dimercaptosuc-
99m
Tc MAG3
99m
Tc DMSA for quantifying
Figure 8.6 DMSA scintigraphy in a child with
bilateral duplex system ureteroceles. Left upper moiety non-functioning, minimal function in thin rim of renal parenchyma in hydronephrotic right upper moiety. Normal function in both lower moieties.
VOIDING CYSTOURETHROGRAPHY (VCUG)
e VCUG plays an important role when plan­ning management of duplication anomalies. It is an essential investigation if there is any sug­gestion of lower pole VUR (which is present in approximately 50% of cases) and also provides dynamic anatomical information on the ureters, bladder and urethra. is may be particularly helpful in demonstrating partial obstruction of the bladder neck and proximal urethra by a pro­lapsing ureterocele.
Reux into the lower pole of a complete duplex kidney has a characteristic appearance which is likened to a “drooping ower” (Figure 8.7). Reux into the upper pole of a complete duplex system is rare. When a VCUG demonstrates reux into both poles this is usually indicative of a partial duplication. e nding of contralateral VUR may be an important factor when devising an overall plan of management.
Figure 8.7 VCUG demonstrating bilateral lower
https://t.me/medicina_free
pole VUR with characteristic “drooping ower” appearances. Displacement of left lower pole ureter by grossly dilated upper pole ureter.
Management 109
MAGNETIC RESONANCE UROGRAPHY
Magnetic resonance (MR) urography has been used on a selective basis for investigating complex patterns of duplication and detecting a poorly functioning dysplastic upper pole associated with infra sphincteric ectopic ureter. However, it is rapidly becoming the rst line investigation of choice in girls whose urinary incontinence is suspected to be related to a possible ectopic ureter (Figure 8.8). MR urography can yield informa­tion on function as well as providing an accurate delineation of anatomy and vasculature. It does not entail any exposure to radiation but is rela­tively costly and requires the use of sedation or general anesthesia to ensure the child remains still for the duration of the scan.
CYSTOSCOPY
Although not routinely indicated, cystoscopy can nevertheless make an important contribution to
Figure 8.8 MR Urogram demonstrating
an “occult” duplex ectopic ureter which could not be visualized by other imaging techniques.
diagnosis and management in selected cases. For example, visual assessment by cystoscopy (and vaginoscopy) may provide valuable additional information on ureteroceles which was not forthcoming from diagnostic imaging and it may also occasionally identify an occult ectopic ure­teral orice. Endoscopic techniques are widely used for the surgical management of ureteroceles and may also be used for endoscopic correction of VUR.
MANAGEMENT
Upper tract duplication is characterized by considerable diversity of anatomy and func­tion. In addition, it may either be detected prenatally or present clinically with diering symptoms, notably urinary tract infection or
110 Duplication Anomalies, Ureteroceles and Ectopic Ureters
https://t.me/medicina_free
urinary incontinence. Accordingly, there is no single approach to management – which must be adapted to account of the anatomy, function and presenting features of each individual case.
Prenatally Detected Duplication
e majority of infants with prenatally detected upper tract duplication are asymptomatic at the time of birth and have no abnormal clinical nd­ings on examination.
e aims of management of infants with pre­natally detected duplex kidneys can be summa­rized as:
Prevention of febrile urinary tract infections
which might pose threat of new pyelone-
phritic scarring or progression of existing
renal damage.
Relief of obstruction.
Correction of anatomical abnormalities
which would otherwise be destined to cause
symptoms, notably urinary incontinence, in
later childhood.
upper pole system. In infants with prenatally detected ureteroceles, it is performed with the intention of reducing the risk of infection in the obstructed system and protecting the upper pole parenchyma from infective and/or obstructive damage. It can also be used as temporizing mea­sure in children who present with severe infec­tion in the upper pole system.
Endoscopic puncture of a small or medium sized ureterocele can be performed with a 3 Fr Bugbee electrode or with holmium laser inserted via the working channel of a 7.5–10 Fr pediatric cystoscope (Figure 8.9). Alternatively, the ure­terocele can be incised with an electrical hook
However, the long-term natural history of asymp­tomatic infants who have been born with less severe forms of duplication is not well docu­mented. For this reason, it is important to avoid submitting healthy infants to surgical interven­tion which is not justied or which is needlessly invasive.
A number of studies have reported the success­ful conservative management of some forms of prenatally detected duplication such as intravesi­cal ureteroceles associated with non-functioning/ cystic dysplastic upper pole tissue or upper pole moieties which appear non-obstructed on dynamic renography. However, the duration of follow up in such studies has been relatively short (<10 years) and the longer term outcomes of con­servative management are not yet known.
Endoscopic Incision
is is the least invasive form of intervention and is used mainly to decompress an intravesical ure­terocele and facilitate drainage in an obstructed
Figure 8.9 Diagrammatic representation of
simplest intervention-endoscopic puncture. The ureterocele can also be incised more exten­sively by cold knife or laser.
Management / Ectopic Ureter 111
https://t.me/medicina_free
or cold knife. e horizontal incision should be sited close to the junction between the uretero­cele and bladder wall to prevent the creation of a potentially obstructive ap and to reduce the risk of inducing reux.
e main drawback of endoscopic incision is that it can cause the onset of reux in a previously non-reuxing system. is occurs in approxi­mately 50% of cases and is associated with a sig­nicant incidence of urinary infection. For this reason, endoscopic incision results in a require­ment for subsequent secondary surgical interven­tion in at least 20% of cases.
Endoscopic incision can also be applied to the management of extravesical ureteroceles. However, an additional incision distal to the bladder neck at the lowest part of the uretero­cele is advisable to prevent the decompressed ureterocele from lling with urine and causing bladder neck obstruction at the time of voiding. Although, endoscopic incision of an extravesi­cal ureterocele may be a worthwhile short-term measure is rarely curative and additional surgi­cal intervention is required in the majority of cases.
Depending on its size and degree of dilata­tion of the upper tract dilatation, a single system, orthotopic ureterocele can also be managed by endoscopic incision. However, because this car­ries a signicant risk of inducing reux some pediatric urologists favor surgical excision of the ureterocele combined with ureteral reimplanta­tion. is is a relatively straightforward proce­dure with a high success rate.
of ureter. A suprapubic incision and transvesi­cal approach are required to provide adequate access to the region of the bladder neck for excision of a prolapsing ectopic ureterocele (caecoureterocele). is is a technically challeng­ing operation because the bladder neck is oen decient in the vicinity of the ureterocele and bladder neck reconstruction may be required. e parents should be advised of the possible risk of sphincter weakness incontinence. In this con­text, however, there is good published evidence that bladder neck/sphincter weakness in such cases is more likely to be related to a preexisting congenital anatomical deciency than a compli­cation of the surgery.
Intravesical ureteroceles and some extravesi­cal ureteroceles can be managed by upper pole heminephrectomy and excision of an accessible length of ureter performed through a single loin incision. Once the ureter has been tran­sected, urine is aspirated from the ureterocele and residual length of distal ureter – leaving the decompressed ureterocele and “ureteral stump” in situ. When used selectively this “simplied approach” constitutes denitive treatment in the majority of patients, with only 10–20% requir­ing subsequent excision of the ureteral stump and ureterocele and reimplantation of the lower pole ureter.
e various procedures described above are being increasingly performed by a minimally invasive (laparoscopic or robotic assisted) rather than open surgery.
Upper Pole Heminephrectomy or Heminephroureterectomy (Figure 8.10)
Although now being performed less frequently, this procedure retains a valuable role when the upper moiety is non-functioning or poorly func­tioning and the collecting system and ureter are grossly dilated. e denitive surgical manage­ment of a large and/or ectopic ureterocele con­sists of removing the upper pole moiety and as much of the ureter as can be accessed through a ank incision. A second (groin) incision is then used to remove the remaining (distal) section
Ectopic Ureter
Supra-sphincteric
In most cases, the ipsilateral upper pole is non­functioning and heminephrectomy (open or laparoscopic) is sucient. However, this type of ectopic ureter is occasionally associated with reux into the upper pole moiety – for which it is also necessary to remove the ureter. In the rare cases in which there is a worthwhile degree of function in the upper pole the ectopic upper pole ureter and the lower pole ureter can be reim­planted together “en-bloc” into the bladder.