Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_32_библиотеки_им_акад_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
22 Мб
Скачать
302 Pediatric Genitourinary Trauma
https://t.me/medicina_free
Grade V injury is one in which the renal tis­sue is separated into multiple renal fragments (“shattered kidney”). It can be dicult to deter­mine which segments of tissue are poorly per­fused as a result of severe contusion and which segments have been completely devascularized. Massive bleeding and extravasation within Gerota’s fascia is common. Major hilar injury leading to devascularization also constitutes a grade V renal injury.
Management
e goals of care focus on preservation of renal tissue and renal function while minimizing the morbidity and risk of mortality posed by the injury. Most blunt renal injuries can be managed non-operatively, particularly since the major­ity are low grade (I–III). Conservative manage­ment usually involves bed rest until hematocrit measurements have stabilized and hematuria has resolved. Monitoring of vital signs is impera­tive to assess hemodynamic stability. Although reevaluation with ultrasound can be used to detect any expanding urinoma or hematoma, CT imaging is indicated if there is deterioration in the child’s clinical condition or hemodynamic instability which might necessitate surgical inter­vention. Conservative management is highly suc­cessful in preventing long-term complications such as hypertension, loss of renal function and hydronephrosis.
Indications for surgery are frequently relative and include:
Hemorrhage: Intervention may be required
to control active hemorrhage which is caus-
ing hemodynamic instability (e.g. pulsatile
hematoma on CT). Selective angioemboliza-
tion may be eective in stopping bleeding
of minor severity but surgical intervention
should be considered if this is unsuccess-
ful or the child is requiring repeated blood
transfusions.
Urinary extravasation: A minor degree
of contained urinary extravasation may
be managed conservatively and monitored
whereas larger and/or persistent collections
may require percutaneous drainage. Partial disruption of the uretero pelvic junction (UPJ) may be amenable to ureteral stent placement whereas complete disruption may require either percutaneous drainage as a temporizing measure or immediate surgical repair.
“Shattered kidney” (grade V injury): Even in a hemodynamically stable patient, removal of a non-functioning “shattered” kidney may be justied to hasten recovery and reduce long-term complications. In the presence of other intra-abdominal injuries requiring laparotomy, a “shattered” kidney should be removed concurrently.
Hilar injury: e prospect of successful revascularization is minimal when blood supply is compromised and warm isch­emia time exceeds one hour. However, this relatively desperate attempt to conserve the kidney may be justied in very rare circum­stances, such as a solitary kidney or bilateral renal injuries.
At the time of operation, the initial priority is to gain vascular control of the renal pedicle and aorta. Once hemostasis has been achieved, the kidney and collecting system can be inspected, devitalized tissue can be debrided and any defects in the parenchyma closed and covered wherever possible. In certain cases partial nephrectomy may be a better way of preserving the remain­ing viable renal tissue. Urinary extravasation can be managed with a ureteral stent or nephros­tomy tube. As stated above, emergency repair of a severe pedicle injury or thrombosis is unlikely to result in preservation of the kidney since the warm ischemic time will already have been exceeded while the child was being evaluated and resuscitated prior to surgery. Penetrating trauma is most commonly the result of gunshot or stab wounds and is, therefore, largely conned to the older age group. Because these injuries tend to be more severe and involve other organs there is usually a greater requirement for blood transfu­sion and stronger likelihood of nephrectomy. While stab wounds and low-velocity gunshot wounds may cause localized injury, high-velocity gunshot wounds are associated with blast eect
tissue damage, which may make it more dicult
https://t.me/medicina_free
to determine the true extent of injury on initial evaluation.
Outcomes and Complications
The most serious early complication of renal trauma is acute bleeding, with the highest risk being immediately following the injury. Even if there is a low suspicion for severe injury the child should be admitted for bed rest and serial hemoglobin/hematocrit monitoring. Secondary hematuria is not uncommon within the first few days and weeks of the injury. Although it is rarely of sufficient severity to require active surgical intervention secondary hematuria should be monitored carefully to rule out the development of an arteriovenous malformation or pseudoaneurysm. This risk is highest in patients with higher grade trauma who are managed conservatively. Infection is another potential early complication, particu­larly if there is a significant urinoma and a substantial amount of devitalized renal tissue. Initially, it may be difficult to distinguish on ultrasound between old blood products, resolv­ing urinoma, and possible abscess formation but serial imaging should enable this distinc­tion to be made. Outcomes following penetrat­ing injuries to the kidney are generally worse than for blunt injury. The most significant late complications of renal trauma are hyper­tension and loss of renal function. The risk of hypertension is likely to be higher when a significant amount of devascularized renal tis­sue has been left in place. The true incidence of hypertension is difficult to assess because of the lack of reliable long-term data but the avail­able evidence indicates it is relatively rare with an incidence of 1–2%. Nevertheless, monitor­ing of blood pressure is generally advisable in view of the small risk of hypertension, which might indicate late complications requiring medical or surgical management.
Full recovery of function can usually be expected following low-grade trauma (grades I–III), whereas grade IV and V inju­ries are more likely to result in some perma­nent reduction in renal size and function.
Ureteric injury 303
Figure 22.3 A linear scar in the left kidney per-
sisting 3 months following a grade III injury.
Surprisingly, even segments or renal paren­chyma in a shattered kidney may sometimes retain their blood supply and viability and become realigned in a functional configura­tion. However, the prognosis of severe inju­ries can be adversely affected by the presence of persisting morphological changes includ­ing scars, cysts, or segmental hydronephrosis (Figure 22.3). Nuclear medicine studies, such as 99m Tc dimercaptoacetyltriglycine (MAG3) or 99m Tc dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) are helpful in monitoring functional recovery over time and in guiding a decision on whether to perform reconstruction or nephrectomy in the case of an injured kidney, which has been sta­bilized by nephrostomy drainage (Figure 22.4). If the contralateral kidney is healthy, the risk of post-traumatic renal failure is low. Statistically, the risk of injuring a solitary kid­ney, even during contact sports, is extremely low so there is little justification for restricting normal activities and sports.
URETERIC INJURY
Injuries to the ureter are rare and usually result from penetrating trauma or iatrogenic damage – for example during ureteroscopy, tumor resection, or laparoscopy.
304 Pediatric Genitourinary Trauma
https://t.me/medicina_free
Figure 22.4 A 17-year-old boy experienced a
grade IV renal laceration with UPJ disruption following a snowmobile accident. An indwell­ing ureteral stent could not be placed and a nephrostomy tube was used as a temporizing measure. Delayed MAG-3 test demonstrated only 10% function and an elective laparoscopic nephrectomy was performed.
Evaluation
Gross hematuria is not necessarily present even aer a signicant ureteral injury. A high index of suspicion must therefore be maintained to avoid missing the diagnosis. Delayed computerized tomography (CT) imaging with use of contrast to visualize the entire collecting system is most helpful in this regard.
ureteral repair is the creation of a tension free, spatulated anastomosis. Devitalized segments should be excised to ensure that healthy ureteral tissue is used for the anastomosis. Depending on the level and extent of the injury the options include; spatulation with end-to-end anastomo­sis, psoas hitch and Boari ap. For more extensive injuries ureteral substitution by ileal interposi­tion may have to be considered.
Outcomes and Complications
If the injury is not recognized or is not correctly managed the primary complication is urinary extravasation into the retroperitoneum resulting in urinoma or abscess formation. Long-term out­comes following repair are generally favorable – although the published data are sparse.
BLADDER INJURY
Traumatic injuries to the bladder are rare in this age group and are usually associated with other severe injuries including pelvic fractures. Motor vehicle accidents are the leading cause of blunt pelvic trauma and bladder injury. By compari­son to an adult, the bladder in a child is located in a more vulnerable position which is higher in the abdomen and less protected by the bony pelvis. Penetrating injuries of the bladder are exceedingly rare in children and are usually iatrogenic, for example inadvertent damage to the bladder wall during herniotomy or dicult appendectomy.
Management
Management of ureteral injuries in children generally mirrors the management in adults and should be individualized according the site and nature of the injury. Prompt surgical repair is indicated for injuries which are recognized immediately or shortly aer they have occurred. However, a period of temporizing nephrostomy drainage is preferable when the diagnosis is delayed by > 1 week, with denitive repair being delayed for a few months. e key principle of
Evaluation
e hallmark signs of bladder and urethral injury are suprapubic pain, tenderness, inability to uri­nate, gross hematuria, and blood at the urethral meatus. Indications for bladder imaging include gross hematuria and/or urinary retention in con­junction with a pelvic fracture.
e initial CT scan may not be adequate to completely characterize bladder injury, although delayed imaging aer bladder lling may be helpful when looking for possible extravasation.
Urethral injury / Management 305
https://t.me/medicina_free
Other imaging modalities which may be use­ful include cystography or intravenous pyelog­raphy. CT cystography is sensitive and specic but involves signicant radiation exposure and should be used judiciously.
Management
Free leakage of urine into the peritoneum is indicative of an intraperitoneal injury for which surgical intervention is required in the majority of cases. However, non-operative management can be used successfully for small, isolated blad­der injuries. Extraperitoneal perforation, with extravasation conned to the perivesical space, can usually be managed by a period of continu­ous catheter drainage. However, if there are other concurrent injuries requiring surgical interven­tion this may be an opportunity to close the blad­der defect and hasten recovery.
Outcomes and Complications
Early complications include persistent gross hematuria, clot retention, and pelvic abscess. Hematuria is typically self-limiting but may require intermittent or continuous irrigation. Abscess or urinoma can be drained percuta­neously. Large intraperitoneal injuries may be complicated by peritonitis, paralytic ileus and metabolic disturbance, such as hyponatremia, hypokalemia, and elevated serum urea and creat­inine. Late complications are uncommon but can include urinary stula, persistent lower urinary tract symptoms or persistent incontinence.
URETHRAL INJURY
ese are generally conned to males and can result from either direct blunt trauma to the ure­thra or injuries associated with pelvic fracture. In adults, the posterior urethra is supported by the prostate but in boys the prostate has not yet devel­oped so that when the pelvic ring is disrupted, shear forces can disrupt the pelvic oor and drag the membranous urethra apart from the bladder
and prostate. Straddle injuries typically result from falls on bicycles, playground equipment and bars, and fences. e mechanism of injury occurs when the urethra and surrounding corpus spon­giosum are crushed against the pubic rami.
Evaluation
e signs of urethral injury are an inability to urinate, gross hematuria, and blood at the ure­thral meatus.
A retrograde urethrogram is widely regarded as the best imaging study for visualizing the ure­thra. Oblique views are necessary to look for pos­terior extravasation and demonstrate complete continuity of the urethra.
Management
Initial management of urethral injury involves bladder drainage and radiological evaluation. A Foley catheter may be placed into the bladder under radiographic guidance if the urethra is intact with only a small tear. Alternatively, if the patient has already voided and examination does not suggest urethral injury, a urethral catheter can be placed immediately without a retrograde study. If a catheter has been placed previously, it should not be removed. In such cases, an infant feeding tube can be introduced alongside the catheter in order to facilitate the urethrogram and assess injury.
e management of injuries to the bulbar or anterior urethra is typically straightforward and consists of either observation or urethral catheter drainage alone. e primary risk is the later development of a urethral stricture. e initial management of posterior urethral inju­ries is more complex. If possible, placement of a urethral catheter will help to align the urethra as well as providing bladder drainage. However, this may not be feasible if there is complete dis­ruption and the urethra is no longer in conti­nuity. As in adults, the management of these severe injuries is controversial. e options include prolonged suprapubic tube drainage fol­lowed by delayed urethroplasty or, alternatively, immediate exploration with debridement and
306 Pediatric Genitourinary Trauma
https://t.me/medicina_free
primary realignment. If a delayed repair strat­egy is employed, continuous drainage should be maintained for at least 6–8 weeks before ure­throplasty is attempted. Injuries to the urethra which involve the bladder neck and/or prostate require immediate intervention to minimize the risk of long-term complications, such as stricture, incontinence, and stula. Fortunately, such injuries are very uncommon. Traumatic injuries of female urethra are extremely rare because of the shorter length of the urethra and the more protected location. ese inju­ries typically occur in conjunction with severe pelvic fractures and vaginal injury and may consist of either transverse disruption or a lon­gitudinal tear. Conservative management can be employed if the bladder neck is intact and a urethral catheter can be passed into the blad­der. However, immediate surgical repair is indi­cated if the bladder neck is transected or the vagina is also involved in the injury. In some cases, the preferred management may comprise a period of suprapubic catheterization followed by delayed repair. Long-term outcomes are gen­erally poor because a traumatic force which is of sucient severity to cause damage to the female urethra usually causes extensive damage to the tissues supporting the urethra as well as causing pelvic fractures.
INJURIES TO THE EXTERNAL GENITALIA
In the neonatal period, penile injuries are usually iatrogenic and related to circumcision. In older boys, the penis or prepuce may become trapped in a zipper – with resultant contusion or pressure necrosis of the prepuce. Other forms of penile injury include dog bites and high-ow priapism associated with a traumatic arteriovenous stula secondary to perineal trauma.
e testis may be injured as a result of a bicycle crossbar injury in which the testis is compressed against the pubic ramus, causing disruption of the tunica albuginea. Other causes include kicks to the scrotum during sporting activity or rough play and ghts. Traumatic genital injuries are rare in girls and typically result from straddle injuries. Because of the proximity of the urethra and vagina, traumatic injuries of the external genitalia or urethra should prompt an evalua­tion for associated vaginal injuries. A high index of suspicion of possible sexual abuse is required whenever a girl presents with a genital injury, particularly if the nature of the injury seems dis­cordant with the history.
Evaluation and Management
Outcomes and Complications
Stricture formation is the most significant complication following urethral injuries. Experience with urethral stricture and ure­throplasty in children is limited, but the man­agement options are similar to those in adults. Optical urethrotomy may be appropriate for short, well defined strictures. For more exten­sive strictures the choice usually lies between stricture resection and end to end anastomosis or urethroplasty utilizing onlay grafts of buccal mucosa or other materials. A perineal approach usually provides optimal exposure. Injuries to the posterior urethra which involve the blad­der neck, prostatic urethra, and sphincteric complex, carry a high risk of serious long-term complications, notably urinary incontinence and impotence.
Excessive removal of penile skin due to neonatal circumcision can be managed conservatively in the majority of cases but later reconstructive sur­gery (including the use of free skin gras) may occasionally be required if there has been exten­sive excision of penile sha skin. Circumcision injuries involving the glans or urethra are rare but may require complex reconstruction.
Supercial penile contusions and lacerations can typically be managed with topical antibiotic ointments, but may require minor debridement and skin approximation depending on the mech­anism and severity of the injury. Zipper injuries usually occur in uncircumcised boys and may be treated using mineral oil to release the trapped skin from the zipper or dividing the zipper with bone cutters. Genital injuries caused by animal bites should be assessed under anesthesia to fully assess the extent of trauma and broad spectrum
Injuries to the external genitalia / Complications 307
https://t.me/medicina_free
antibiotics and tetanus prophylaxis should be administered. High-ow priapism may be man­aged non-operatively because of the likelihood of spontaneous resolution within days to weeks aer injury. If conservative measures fail, embolization with autologous clot is the preferred treatment.
In cases of scrotal trauma, ultrasound is an excellent investigation to assess any testicu­lar injury. Early scrotal exploration should be undertaken if there is clinical or ultrasound evi­dence of testicular rupture or a signicant tear in the tunica albuginea (Figure 22.5). In rare cases of penetrating scrotal injury a detailed exami­nation is required to determine the depth of penetration prior to treatment by cleansing and debridement.
Operative management is seldom required for uncomplicated genital trauma in young
girls. However, sexual abuse or assault is impli­cated in up to 25% girls presenting with geni­tal injuries. In these circumstances cystoscopy, vaginoscopy, and rectal examination should be performed to fully evaluate any associated injuries. For more extensive vaginal lacerations, primary repair should be performed if possible to reduce the rate of vaginal stenosis and ure­throvaginal stulae.
Complications
Acute complications of penile trauma include bleeding and infection, particularly in cases of animal bites. Late complications of penile injury include penile entrapment (cicatrix), meatal ste­nosis, and unsatisfactory cosmetic outcomes. e outcome of circumcision injuries is gener­ally excellent, although a very small proportion will require further surgery to provide adequate skin coverage of the penile sha. Penetrating scrotal injuries pose a risk of infection but this can be considerably reduced by adequate cleans­ing, debridement, and the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. Inadequate surgical management of a signicant injury to the testis may lead to a pro­longed recovery and convalescence.
e most signicant complication following vaginal trauma is stricture – although this is usu­ally conned to severe injuries. Follow-up into puberty is essential to exclude possible stenosis or hematocolpos, especially in patients with exten­sive urethrovaginal injuries.
Figure 22.5 A 12-year-old boy experienced a
straddle injury with signicant scrotal pain and hematoma. Testicular ultrasound suggested a rupture and exploration is demonstrating a 1 cm tear in the tunica albuginea. 4-0 PDS was used to reapproximate the edges and there was no atrophy on follow-up.
KEY POINTS
Potentially serious renal trauma can occur in children aer seemingly innocuous injury.
All children with suspected renal trauma should be admitted for observa­tion, imaging, and evaluation.
Most cases of renal trauma can be managed conservatively, but grade IV–V injuries are more likely to require intervention.
308 Pediatric Genitourinary Trauma
https://t.me/medicina_free
After recovery from the acute injury, blood pressure should be monitored.
The risk of significant injury to a solitary kidney is extremely low and does not usually justify any restric­tions on everyday life or sporting activity.
Extraperitoneal bladder injuries can be managed conservatively with cath­eter drainage whereas intraperitoneal injury is an indication for surgical repair.
Surgical management of post-traumatic urethral strictures should only be undertaken by an experienced pediat­ric or reconstructive urologist.
e possibility of sexual abuse should always be considered in any child pre­senting with an injury to the external genitalia.
FURTHER READING
Americal Urological Association Guidelines on
UroTrauma. 2017. https://www.auanet.org/
guidelines/urotrauma-guideline#x3296
Buckley JC, McAninch JW. Pediatric renal inju-
ries: management guidelines from a 25-year experience. J Urol. 2004;172(2):687–690, discussion 90.
Buckley JC, McAninch JW. The diagnosis, man-
agement, and outcomes of pediatric renal injuries. Urol Clin North Am. 2006;33(1):33– 40, vi.
McAleer IM, Kaplan GW, LoSasso BE.
Congenital urinary tract anomalies in pediat­ric renal trauma patients. J Urol. 2002;168(4, Pt 2):1808–1810, discussion 10.
Santucci RA, McAninch JW, Sar M, Mario
LA, Service S, Segal MR. Validation of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Organ Injury Severity Scale for the Kidney. J Trauma. 2001;50(2):195–200.
Laparoscopic Paediatric Urology
https://t.me/medicina_free
KARLY ZAHER, SARA LOBO and IMRAN MUSHTAQ
Topics covered
23
Overview of benets and limitations of
laparoscopic surgery in paediatric urology Robotic surgery – Benets and limitations Patient selection Fundamentals of technique: Robotic and
non-robotic Procedures, indications and outcomes
INTRODUCTION
e role of laparoscopy in paediatric urology was initially limited to diagnostic indications, such as the investigation of impalpable testes. In 1976, Cortesi was the rst to report the use of laparos­copy to perform a therapeutic procedure – in the treatment of crypthorchidism. e well-estab­lished benets of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) have been further enhanced by the intro­duction of single site surgery. Innovations in robotics have helped to overcome diculties of working in limited spaces, permitted more eective intracorporeal suturing and provided three-dimensional (3D) visualisation and tech­nology to eliminate manual tremor during operative manoeuvres. These and other devel­opments now enable the surgeon to operate with far greater precision. The advent of MIS
Nephrectomy Heminephrectomy Pyeloplasty (including robotic pyeloplasty) Adrenalectomy Reconstructive surgery Others
and robotics has provided new insights into the anatomy of the urogenital tract and the condi­tions which affect it. It has also created chal­lenging opportunities for minimally invasive paediatric urologists to develop and introduce innovative techniques for reconstructive sur­gery of the lower urinary tract.
BENEFITS AND LIMITATIONS
e acknowledged benets of laparoscopic surgery in children include; reduced postop­erative pain, shorter hospital stay, earlier return to normal activities, improved cosmesis and fewer wound complications. e smaller size of the paediatric patient has the great advan­tage of allowing access to both the upper and
309
310 Laparoscopic Paediatric Urology
https://t.me/medicina_free
lower urinary tract through the same port sites. Laparoscopy also provides superior access to the pelvis when operating, for example, on Müllerian duct remnants, intra-abdominal testes and cloa­cal anomalies.
Paediatric urology encompasses a wide spectrum of conditions (including a variety of congenital anomalies and benign and malig­nant tumours) in patients ranging in age and size from neonates to adolescents. In addition, minimally invasive paediatric urologists face the challenge of having to overcome the techni­cal diculties inherent in operating in relatively conned anatomical spaces (as in the retro­peritoneoscopic [RP] approach). However, these have been largely addressed by advances in cam­era technology and instrumentation. One of the main drawbacks of laparoscopic surgery relates to the high nancial costs of the technology and equipment. Although these additional costs may be partially oset by the economic advantage of a reduced duration of hospital stay this consid­eration is of less importance in children than adults. e complications of laparoscopic sur­gery in children, however, are broadly similar to those in adults.
Robotic Surgery – Benets and Limitations
Robotic surgery oers the benets of a mini­mally invasive approach whilst overcoming some of the limitations of laparoscopic surgery. Robotic surgery provides better visualisation (with 3D, magnied images), superior ergo­nomics, tremor ltration and improved dex­terity than traditional laparoscopy. However, a major limitation of the Da Vinci robotic system is the lack of tactile feedback – which requires the operating surgeon to rely far more on visual information. Another disadvantage is the large capital outlay for the robot and ongoing costs of consumables. ere are also risks which are unique to the robotic system, such as human error in operating the robot and problems aris­ing from mechanical failure and malfunction of the system. Despite recent modications and upgrades, the bulky equipment still demands a sizeable space for storage.
SCOPE OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY IN PAEDIATRIC UROLOGY
MIS now fulls a key role in paediatric urology and used for a wide range of procedures including;
Nephrectomy and partial nephrectomy
Pyeloplasty
Adrenalectomy
Excision/marsupialisation of renal cysts
Pyelolithotomy and ureterolithotomy
Ureteric surgery including; excision of ureteric stump aer partial nephrectomy, ureteroureterostomy, ureterocalicostomy
Ureteric reimplantation
Investigation and management of impalpable testis
Treatment of varicocele
Investigation and treatment of disorders of sex development (DSD), e.g. gonadal biopsy. Gonadectomy
Ovarian harvest for cryopreservation
Excision of Müllerian remnants
Lower urinary tract reconstruction includ­ing; bladder reconstruction (augmentation) Monti/Mitrofano procedures, bladder neck reconstruction and Sling procedure
Contraindications
Almost all conditions in paediatric urology are ame­nable to a minimally invasive approach and there are very few contraindications. e use of MIS has also been extended to the treatment of Wilms tumour. In carefully selected patients the results of laparoscopic total nephrectomy and lymphadenectomy are com­parable to those of open surgery. With increasing experience it is likely that large and more complex Wilms tumours may prove to be amenable to MIS. For the time being, however, most oncology centres continue to favour open surgery for Wilms tumour.
Absolute contraindications to the use of MIS
include:
Signicant comorbidity (e.g. cardiac, respira­tory disease)
Uncorrectable coagulopathies
Sepsis
Fundamentals of technique / Access 311
https://t.me/medicina_free
FUNDAMENTALS OF TECHNIQUE
Anaesthesia
Anaesthesia for MIS procedures in children requires endotracheal intubation and the use of volatile and/or intravenous anaesthetic agents. Because respiration in infants and young chil­dren is predominantly diaphragmatic, abdomi­nal insuation during transperitoneal (TP) surgery may compromise diaphragmatic excur­sion. Insuation pressures are therefore kept low in infants and children. Younger children absorb proportionately more CO2 than other age groups during pneumoperitoneum formation and may also experience greater transient elimination of CO2 postdesuation. For this reason small chil­dren warrant particularly close monitoring dur­ing laparoscopy and the immediate postoperative period. Underbody/overbody warming mats are used routinely in children because they are at sig­nicant risk of developing hypothermia during laparoscopic surgery, especially with prolonged operating times and a high gas ow.
Instrumentation
Laparoscopic instruments are available in a wide range of sizes (2, 2.5, 3 and 5 mm) – although a 5 mm 30° laparoscope provides optimum visuali­sation for most procedures. e Hasson cannula, which is used for the initial access, is available in 5 mm and 10 mm sizes. For diagnostic and recon­structive procedures (e.g. pyeloplasty), the 5 mm cannula is sucient. However, a 10 mm cannula is required when an Endopouch retrieval device is required for specimen extraction. A wide assort­ment of reusable or disposable instrument trocars are available. Bladeless trocars are generally safer for use in children, in whom the abdominal wall is more compliant and less muscular.
abdominal wall. However, the Hasson technique is the preferred method for establishing a pneumo­peritoneum in children. is is an ʻopenʼ proce- dure in which the needle is inserted under direct vision. A stab incision is made in the supraum­bilical skin crease, and is enlarged along Langer’s line. e underlying linea alba is then grasped and opened transversely with scissors or a scalpel. e peritoneum is opened in a similar manner and the Hasson cannula introduced into the peritoneal cavity and secured in place with a skin suture. Because of the limited working space and relatively large size of the liver, spleen and bladder in chil­dren, the insertion of trocars and instrumentation should always be performed under direct vision to avoid iatrogenic complications. For retroperi­toneoscopic (RP) procedures a blunt approach is used to access the retroperitoneum (Figure 23.1).
In common with traditional laparoscopic sur­gery, robotic surgery utilises small incisions and insuation of the anatomical operative space with CO are inserted through access ports and are manipu­lated remotely by the operating surgeon seated at a console. e system has three major components: the robot (mobile tower with three or four arms, including a camera arm and instrument arms), the bedside cart (image processing equipment and light source) and the console (where the surgeon performs the surgery with two handpieces aided by the use of two binocular lenses, which magnify and create a 3D image) (Figure 23.2).
most widely – with instruments available in
. e robotic camera and instruments
2
e Da Vinci robotic surgical system is used
Access
ere are two methods of accessing the perito­neum: in the blind technique a Veress needle is inserted into the peritoneal cavity via the skin adjacent to the umbilicus through all layers of the
Figure 23.1 Port placement for a transperito-
neal laparoscopic nephrectomy.