Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5605_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
22 Мб
Скачать
Use of Medicinal Plants: Interindividual Variability of Their Effects from a Genetic… ITexLi.113841
for activating vitamin K, a cofactor of clotting factors. It was found that individuals
381
https://t.me/medicina_free
with CT and TT genotypes of VKORC1 present a reduction in warfarin activity when administered with cranberry extract by 22% and 11%, respectively [77]. This case is an example of genetic polymorphisms in the pharmacodynamic pathway that may also be involved in plant-drug interactions.
Numerous interactions between plants and medicines have been described and
explained by the pharmacodynamic and metabolization process [78–83] where CYP play a role (Tables
Pharmacodynamics (PD) and pharmacokinetics (PK) are hard to predict in all
).
patients, and best practice involves the use of standard dosing based on weight and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM).
Pharmacodynamics (PD) and pharmacokinetics (PK) are hard to predict in all
patients, and best practice involves the use of standard dosing based on weight and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Pharmacogenetics (PG) is the use of genetic screening to predict metabolic responses to different drugs and enables more accurate predictions of PD and PK to be made. The biggest challenge in reducing metabolic
Pharmacodynamic and/or pharmacokinetic changes
Increased concentration of
*
ARV
Concentration reduction Alteration of GPP Celiprolol Therapeutic failure
Concentration reduction Inhibition of CYP1A2 Antipsychotics and
Increased concentration Unknown Sulfasalazine Increased ADR risk
Synergistic effect Unknown Warfarin Increased
Increased concentration Unknown Palbociclib Increased ADR risk
Concentration reduction Talinolol Therapeutic failure
Increased concentration Inhibition of CYPA4/5 Tacrolimus Increased ADR risk
Concentration reduction Inhibition of GPP Azatioprin,
Increased concentration Inhibition of CYP3A4 Everolimus Increased ADR risk
Reduced bioavailability (dose dependant)
References: [, –].
*
ARV: antirretrovirals.
**
ADR: adverse drug reaction.
Pharmacokinetic
Inhibition of CYP3A4 (intestinal)
Inhibition of CYP2D6 Ritonavir
Inhibition of GPP
Inhibition of GPP Digoxin Therapeutic failure
Examples of influenced drugs
Indinavir Increased ADR risk
Cobicistat
antidepressants
Capecitabine
Enzalutamide
ciclosporin
Probable outcome
Therapeutic failure
hemorrhagic risk
Hepatotoxicity
**
Table 1. Curcuma: approved use for dyspeptic problems [12]. Some studies show a potential role as an immune modulator and anti-inflammatory [73, 82].

Medicinal Plants – Chemical, Biochemical, and Pharmacological Approaches
382
https://t.me/medicina_free
Pharmacodynamic and/or
pharmacokinetic changes
Increased bioavailability Unknown Antirretrovirals Increased ADR
Increased AUC Inhibition of GPP Simvastatin Increased ADR
Inhibition of folic acid
absortion
Antagonism Unknown Warfarin Therapeutic
Increased AUC Inhibition of OATP1A1 and
Reduced bioavailability Nadolol Therapeutic
Decreased absorption Inhibition of OATP1B1,
Decreased absorption Inhibition of MATE1,
Antagonism Unknown Lisinopril Therapeutic
Increased bioavailability Inhibition of GPP Tacrolimus,
Decreased bioavailability Inhibition of OATP1B1,
References: [, –, –].
*
OCT, OCT: organic cation influx transporters. They are responsible for the hepatic and renal transport of
Met for min.
**
ADR: adverse reaction to the drug.
Pharmacokinetic
OATP1A2
OATP1B3
MATE 2
Inhibition of OCT1, OCT2 (when in interaction with Metformin)
OATP2B1, OATP1A2 (gut) Activation of OATP1B3
Examples of influenced drugs
Tacrolimus, ciclosporin
Beta-blockers Increased ADR
Fluoroquinolones Increased ADR
Statins Increased ADR
Atorvastatin Increased ADR
Atorvastatin Increased ADR
*
ciclosporin
Rosuvastatin Therapeutic
Probable outcome
**
risk
Toxicity/ therapeutic failure
risk
failure
risk
risk
risk
failure
risk
risk
failure
Increased ADR risk
failure
Table 2. Green tea: approved use [52] to combat asthenia and also described as having anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, and antiviral potential [87].
instability arises when we face different crops, plant selection, preparation methods and dosage that can vary and contribute to variations in the effectiveness of herbal medicines.
Anthropological studies can help preserve, understand, and respect the cultural context of practices in the use of medicinal plants and understand aspects linked to the variability of responses associated with the environment, adaptability, and the evolution of the human species.

Use of Medicinal Plants: Interindividual Variability of Their Effects from a Genetic… ITexLi.113841
Pharmacodynamic and/or
383
https://t.me/medicina_free
pharmacokinetic changes
Risk of increased viral load Inhibition of CYP3A4 ARV
Concentration reduction CYP3A4 induction Midazolam Therapeutic
Concentration reduction Unknown Imunossupressors Therapeutic
References: [, –, , , , ].
*
ARV: antirretrovirals.
**
ARD: adverse reaction to the drug.
Table 3. Echinacea-approved use for common cold and acne [93].
Pharmacokinetic
Inhibition of CYP1A2, CYP2C9
Examples of influenced drugs
*
Caffeinne, tolbutamid ADR risk
Warfarin Therapeutic
Probable outcome
Therapeutic failure
**
failure
failure
failure
. The anthropological case of cannabis
Cannabis has been used for various purposes across cultures and throughout history. It has been used not only for medicinal but also for recreational, spiritual, and industrial purposes.
Different cultures have developed unique traditions and practices related to can­nabis consumption. Over time, and in different rules, cannabis has been used as an analgesic, for pain relief, as an anti-inflammatory, and to treat various medical condi­tions. Traditional knowledge about the properties and aspects linked to the uses of the plant has been observed to vary between different cultures, often linked to beliefs and practices that are not only cultural but also religious and spiritual. For example, Rastafarians use it as a sacrament and certain Native American tribes use it in sacred rituals. Industrial uses such as hemp fiber production are historically known for manufacturing textiles, ropes, paper, and other products [95]. However, recreational use for its psychoactive properties in many parts of the world, both historically and in contemporary times, is recognized as the “anthropological marker of cannabis,” although different varieties and methods of consumption have emerged based on cultural preferences. The legal status and social acceptance of cannabis vary widely from one region to another. Some countries and states have legalized its recreational and medicinal use, while others maintain strict prohibitions [96].
Gathering data to develop medicinal cannabis use may lead to two types of prod­ucts: herbal medicines based on padronized and/or quantified extracts on one side and medicines based on specific cannabinoids or combinations of the cannabinoids on the other. In any case, an integrated systematic approach shall consider the interindividual variability of their effects from a genetic and anthropological perspective (Figure ).
Finally, high-quality evidence on the short- and long-term safety of medicinal cannabis is still lacking. Although there is no known level of cannabinoid ingestion that will result in a toxic or lethal dose in humans, it is reported that the median lethal dose of THC in animal models ranges from 800 to >9000mg/kg (depending on the species). Thus, the estimates of a lethal dose of THC for a 70kg human range up to >15g, and for CBD, doses of ca. 1000mg/kg have been tolerated in humans [97, 98].

Medicinal Plants – Chemical, Biochemical, and Pharmacological Approaches
384
https://t.me/medicina_free
Figure 7. Research on the therapeutical potential of specific cannabis strains.
. Conclusions
In conclusion, understanding the interindividual variability of the effects of medicinal plants from a genetic and anthropological perspective is crucial to maxi­mizing their benefits while minimizing potential risks. This approach can contribute to developing personalized and culturally sensitive herbal medicine practices based on nutrigenetics and ecogenetics aspects.
In the food supplements market, numerous plants are freely available for sale that people use, either by prescription or self-medication, intending to treat a health prob­lem and often in combination with chemically synthesized medicines. Due to their multifactorial variability, this aspect denotes the concern and attention necessary to guarantee herbal supplements’ standardization and quality control.
Furthermore, this guarantee is fundamental for the safety of consumers and healthcare providers, who already have the factor of interindividual variability to consider in responding to the use of medicinal plants and possible interactions with medications.
The domain of pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics, through the under­standing of mechanisms of genetic variations and associations of differences in physi­ological actions of medicinal plants, allows us to understand how the interindividual variability, in part due to genetic composition, added to the genotypic biodiversity inherent to plants, can influence their physiological effects on the human body. This information can help personalize herbal remedies in a person-centered, holistic healthcare professional approach.

Use of Medicinal Plants: Interindividual Variability of Their Effects from a Genetic…
385
https://t.me/medicina_free
ITexLi.113841
Medicinal Plants – Chemical, Biochemical, and Pharmacological Approaches
386
https://t.me/medicina_free
References
[1] Raskar S et al. Assessing the impact
of geographical distribution and genetic diversity on metabolic profiles of a medicinal plant, Embelia ribes Burm. f. Plants. 2022;(2861):1-19. DOI:10.3390/ plants11212861
[2] Albert A et al. Temperature is the key
to altitudinal variation of phenolics in Arnica montana L. cv. ARBO. Oecologia. 2009;(1):1-8. DOI:10.1007/ s00442-009-1277-1
[3] Karimi A et al. Metabolomics
approaches for analyzing effects of geographic and environmental factors on the variation of root essential oils of Ferula assa-foetida L. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2020;(37):9940-9952. DOI:10.1021/ acs.jafc.0c03681
[4] Ellegren H, Galtier N. Determinants
of genetic diversity. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2016;(7):422-433. DOI:10.1038/nrg.2016.58
[5] Nadeem MA et al. DNA molecular
markers in plant breeding: Current status and recent advancements in genomic selection and genome editing. Biotechnology and Biotechnological Equipment. 2018;(2):261-285. DOI:10.1080/13102818.2017.1400401
[6] Hufbauer RA. Population genetics
of invasions: Can we link neutral markers to management? Weed Technology. 2004;(sp1):1522-1527. DOI:10.1614/0890-037X(2004)018[1522: PGOICW]2.0.CO;2
[7] Sanchez D et al. Improving the
use of plant genetic resources to sustain breeding programs’ efficiency. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2023;(14):1-9. DOI:10.1073/ pnas
[8] Feng Y, Ryan UM, Xiao L. Genetic
diversity and population structure of cryptosporidium. Trends in Parasitology. 2018;(11):997-1011. DOI:10.1016/j. pt.2018.07.009
[9] Zhang J et al. Genetic diversity
and population structure of cannabis based on the genome-wide development of simple sequence repeat markers. Frontiers in Genetics. 2020;(September):1-12. DOI:10.3389/ fgene.2020.00958
[10] Jannatdoust M et al. Analysis
of genetic diversity and population structure of confectionery sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) native to Iran. Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology. 2016;(1):37-44. DOI:10.1007/s12892-015-0052-6
[11] Delfini J et al. Population structure,
genetic diversity and genomic selection signatures among a Brazilian common bean germplasm. Scientific Reports. 2021;(1):1-12. DOI:10.1038/ s41598-021-82437-4
[12] European Medicines Agency.
European Union herbal monograph on Curcuma longa L., rhizoma final. Committee on Herbal Medicinal Products (HMPC). 2018;(September
2018):1-7. Available from: https:// www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/ herbal-monograph/final-european­union-herbal-monograph-curcuma­longa-l-rhizoma-revision-1_en.pdf
[13] Akhter M. Herbal drug interactions.
Research Anthology on Recent Advancements in Ethnopharmacology and Nutraceuticals. 2021;(10):120-141. DOI:10.4018/978-1-6684-3546-5.ch008
[14] Chainani-Wu N. Safety and anti-
inflammatory activity of curcumin:
Use of Medicinal Plants: Interindividual Variability of Their Effects from a Genetic… ITexLi.113841
A component of tumeric (Curcuma
387
https://t.me/medicina_free
longa). Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine (New York, N.Y.). United States. 2003;(1):161-168. DOI:10.1089/107555303321223035
[15] Kocaadam B, Şanlier N. Curcumin,
an active component of turmeric (Curcuma longa), and its effects on health. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 2017;(13):2889-2895. DOI:10.1080/10408398.2015.1077195
[22] Citti C et al. Cannabinoid profiling of
hemp seed oil by liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2019;(February):1-17. DOI:10.3389/ fpls.2019.00120
[23] Gill EW, Paton WDM,
Pertwee RG. Preliminary experiments on the chemistry and pharmacology of cannabis. Nature. 1970;(5267):134-
136. DOI:10.1038/228134a0
[16] Ruby AJ et al. Anti-tumour
and antioxidant activity of natural curcuminoids. Cancer Letters. 1995;(1):79-83. DOI:10.1016/0304-3835(95)03827-J
[17] Indira KIP. Free radical reactions
of curcumin in membrane models. Free Radical Biology and Medicine. 1997;(6):838-843. DOI:10.1016/ S0891-5849(97)00026-9
[18] Cronin JR. Curcumin:
Old spice is a new medicine. Alternative and Complementary Therapies. 2003;(1):34-38. DOI:10.1089/10762800360520776
[19] Chen M et al. Analysis of genetic
and chemical variability of five curcuma species based on DNA barcoding and HPLC fingerprints. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2023;:1-14, 1229041. DOI:10.3389/fpls.2023.1229041
[24] Hanuš LO et al. Phytocannabinoids:
A unified critical inventory. Natural Product Reports. 2016;:1357-1392. DOI:10.1039/c6np00074f
[25] Jin D et al. Secondary metabolites
profiled in cannabis inflorescences, leaves, stem barks, and roots for medicinal purposes. Scientific Reports. 2020;(1):1-14. DOI:10.1038/ s41598-020-60172-6
[26] McPartland JM, Russo EB. Cannabis
and cannabis extracts. Journal of Cannabis Therapeutics. 2001;(3-4):103-
132. DOI:10.1300/J175v01n03_08
[27] Mechoulam R, Gaoni Y. Recent
advances in the chemistry of hashish. Fortschritte der Chemie organischer Naturstoffe = Progress in the chemistry of organic natural products. Progres dans la chimie des substances organiques naturelles. 1967;:175-213. DOI:10.1007/978-3-7091-8164-5_6
[20] Sethi A, Bhandawat A, Pati PK.
Engineering medicinal plant-derived CYPs: A promising strategy for production of high-valued secondary metabolites. Planta. 2022;(6):1-14. DOI:10.1007/s00425-022-04024-9
[21] Chandra S, Lata H,ElSohly MA.
Cannabis Sativa L.-Botany and Biotechnology. Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer; 2017
[28] Pavlovic R et al. Phytochemical
and ecological analysis of two varieties of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) grown in a mountain environment of Italian Alps. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2019;(October):1-20. DOI:10.3389/ fpls.2019.01265
[29] Arévalo RA et al. Los términos
cultivar o variedad de caña de azúcar (Saccharum spp.). Revista Chapingo
Medicinal Plants – Chemical, Biochemical, and Pharmacological Approaches
388
https://t.me/medicina_free
Serie Horticultura. 2006;XII(1):5-9. DOI:10.5154/r.rchsh.2004.04.027
[30] Tooker JF, Frank SD. Genotypically
diverse cultivar mixtures for insect pest management and increased crop yields. Journal of Applied Ecology. 2012;(5):974-985. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02173.x
[31] McPartland JM. Cannabis
systematics at the levels of family, genus, and species. Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research. 2018;(1):203-
212. DOI:10.1089/can.2018.0039
[32] de Meijer EPM et al. The inheritance
of chemical phenotype in Cannabis sativa L. Genetics. 2003;:335-346. DOI:10.1300/J237v08n02_04
[33] Reimann-Philipp U et al. Cannabis
chemovar nomenclature misrepresents chemical and genetic diversity; survey of variations in chemical profiles and genetic markers in Nevada medical cannabis samples. Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research. 2020;(3):215-
230. DOI:10.1089/can.2018.0063
[34] Zandkarimi F et al. Comparison of
the cannabinoid and terpene profiles in commercial cannabis from natural and artificial cultivation. Molecules. 2023;(2):1-15. DOI:10.3390/ molecules28020833
[35] Hazekamp A, Tejkalová K,
Papadimitriou S. Cannabis: From cultivar to chemovar II - A metabolomics approach to cannabis classification. Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research. 2016;(1):202-215. DOI:10.1089/ can.2016.0017
[36] Sawler J et al. The genetic structure
of marijuana and hemp. PLoS One. 2015;(8):1-9. DOI:10.1371/journal. pone.0133292
[37] Li J, Bluth MH. Pharmacogenomics
of drug metabolizing enzymes and transporters: Implications for cancer therapy. Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine. 2011;(1):11-33. DOI:10.2147/PGPM.S18861
[38] Sim SC,Kacevska M,
Ingelman-Sundberg M. Pharmacogenomics of drug­metabolizing enzymes: A recent update on clinical implications and endogenous effects. Pharmacogenomics Journal. 2013;(1):1-11. DOI:10.1038/tpj.2012.45
[39] Fasinu PS et al. The potential of
Sutherlandia frutescens for herb-drug interaction. Drug Metabolism and Disposition. 2013;(2):488-497. DOI:10.1124/dmd.112.049593
[40] Taesotikul T et al. Effects
of Phyllanthus amarus on the pharmacokinetics of midazolam and cytochrome P450 activities in rats. Xenobiotica. 2012;(7):641-648. DOI:10.3109/00498254.2012.655703
[41] Roth M, Obaidat A, Hagenbuch B.
OATPs, OATs and OCTs: The organic anion and cation transporters of the SLCO and SLC22A gene superfamilies. British Journal of Pharmacology. 2012;(5):1260-1287. DOI:10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01724.x
[42] Deodhar M et al. Mechanisms of
cyp450 inhibition: Understanding drug­drug interactions due to mechanism­based inhibition in clinical practice. Pharmaceutics. 2020;(9):1-18. DOI:10.3390/pharmaceutics12090846
[43] Omura T. Forty years of
cytochrome P450. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 1999;(3):690-698. DOI:10.1006/ bbrc.1999.1887
[44] Johnson EF et al. Correlating
structure and function of
Use of Medicinal Plants: Interindividual Variability of Their Effects from a Genetic… ITexLi.113841
drug-metabolizing enzymes:
389
https://t.me/medicina_free
Progress and ongoing challenges. Drug Metabolism and Disposition. 2014;(1):9-22. DOI:10.1124/ dmd.113.054627
[45] Guengerich FP, Waterman MR,
Egli M. Recent structural insights into cytochrome P450 function. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences. 2016;(8):625-640. DOI:10.1016/j. tips.2016.05.006
[46] Rendic S, Guengerich FP. Survey
of human oxidoreductases and cytochrome P450 enzymes involved in the metabolism of xenobiotic and natural chemicals. Chemical Research in Toxicology. 2015;(1):38-42. DOI:10.1021/tx500444e
[47] Zhao M et al. Cytochrome p450
enzymes and drug metabolism in humans. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021;(23):1-16. DOI:10.3390/ijms222312808
[48] José A, Lemos G, Trindade EJ.
Interferências no Efeito Farmacológico Mediadas pelas Biotransformações dos Citocromos P450. Revista Científica do ITPAC. 2014;(2):1-11
[49] Glaeser H et al. Intestinal drug
transporter expression and the impact of grapefruit juice in humans. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 2007;(3):362-370. DOI:10.1038/ sj.clpt.6100056
[50] Guengerich FP. Cytochrome
P450s and other enzymes in drug metabolism and toxicity. AAPS Journal. 2006;(1):E101-E111. DOI:10.1208/ aapsj080112
[51] Sak K. The Val158Met
polymorphism in COMT gene and cancer risk: Role of endogenous and exogenous catechols. Drug
Metabolism Reviews. 2017;(1):56-83. DOI:10.1080/03602532.2016.1258075
[52] EMA Monograph. Community
herbal monograph on Camellia sinensis (L.) Kuntze, non fermentatum folium final discussion in working party on community monographs and community list (MLWP). EMA. 2013;(November 2013):1-5. Available from: www.ema.europa.eu
[53] Lin CH et al. Genetic polymorphism
of catechol O-methyltransferase and pharmacokinetics of levodopa in healthy Chinese subjects. Methods and Findings in Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology. 2009;(6):389-395. DOI:10.1358/mf.2009.31.6.1386990
[54] Wu AH et al. Tea intake, COMT
genotype, and breast cancer in Asian­American women. Cancer Research. 2003;(21):7526-7529
[55] Lai C-Y et al. Genetic polymorphism
of catechol-O-methyltransferase modulates the association of green tea consumption and lung cancer. European Journal of Cancer Prevention. 2019;(4):316-322. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/ eurjcancerprev/fulltext/2019/07000/ genetic_polymorphism_of.10.aspx
[56] Ladero JM. Influence of
polymorphic N-acetyltransferases on non-malignant spontaneous disorders and on response to drugs. Current Drug Metabolism. 2008;(6):532-537. DOI:10.2174/138920008784892038
[57] Agúndez JAG. Polymorphisms
of human N-acetyltransferases and cancer risk. Current Drug Metabolism. Netherlands. 2008;(6):520-531. DOI:10.2174/138920008784892083
[58] Liu MZ et al. Pharmacogenomics
and herb-drug interactions: Merge of
Medicinal Plants – Chemical, Biochemical, and Pharmacological Approaches
390
https://t.me/medicina_free
future and tradition. Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2015;:8, Article ID 321091. DOI:10.1155/2015/321091
[59] Rao T et al. The pharmacogenetics
of natural products: A pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic perspective. Pharmacological Research. 2019;:104283. DOI:10.1016/j. phrs.2019.104283
[60] Gorski JC et al. The effect of
echinacea (Echinacea purpurea root) on cytochrome P450 activity in vivo. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 2004;(1):89-100. DOI:10.1016/j. clpt.2003.09.013
[61] Harris RZ, Jang GR, Tsunoda S. Dietary
effects on drug metabolism and transport: Clinical pharmacokinetics. Clinical Pharmacokinetics. 2003;(13):1071-1088
[62] Yatsunenko T et al. Human gut
microbiome viewed across age and geography. Nature. 2012;(7402):222-
227. DOI:10.1038/nature11053
[63] Stein CM et al. Cyclosporine
pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in African American and white subjects. 2001;(5):317-323. DOI:10.1067/mcp.2001.115073
[64] Dandara C et al. Cytochrome p450
pharmacogenetics in african populations: Implications for public health. Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism and Toxicology. 2014;(6):769-785. DOI:10.1517/17425255.2014.894020
[65] Sabbagh A et al. Arylamine
N-acetyltransferase 2 (NAT2) genetic diversity and traditional subsistence: A worldwide population survey. PLoS One. 2011;:1-10, e18507. DOI:10.1371/ journal.pone.0018507
an “ultra-slow” acetylation NAT2 variant in humans. Human Biology. 2014;(3):185-214. DOI:10.13110/ humanbiology.86.3.0185
[67] Rubas NC, Maunakea A.
Immunoepigenetic-microbiome Axis: Implications for health disparities research in native Hawaiians and Pacific islanders. Hawaii Journal of Health and Social Welfare. 2021;(8):195-198
[68] Thomford NE et al.
Pharmacogenomics implications of using herbal medicinal plants on African populations in health transition. Pharmaceuticals. 2015;(3):637-663. DOI:10.3390/ph8030637
[69] Gurley BJ et al. Clinical assessment
of CYP2D6-mediated herb-drug interactions in humans: Effects of milk thistle, black cohosh, goldenseal, kava kava, St. John’s wort, and Echinacea. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research. 2008;(7):755-763. DOI:10.1002/ mnfr.200600300
[70] Husain I et al. Screening of
medicinal plants for possible herb­drug interactions through modulating nuclear receptors, drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2023;(August
2022):115822. DOI:10.1016/j. jep.2022.115822
[71] Paul P et al. Interactions-
readdressing the issue. Journal of Current Medical Research and Opinion. 2021;(04):895-919. DOI:10.15520/ jcmro.v4i04.414
[72] Sharma AK, Kapoor VK, Kaur G.
Herb–drug interactions: A mechanistic approach. Drug and Chemical Toxicology. 2022;(2):594-603. DOI:10.1080/01480545.2020.1738454
[66] Patillon B et al. A homogenizing
process of selection has maintained
[73] Spanakis M et al. PharmActa:
Empowering patients to avoid clinical