Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_1050_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана
.pdf
■Carefulpositioningandendoscopicvisualizationof
thecatheterandperformingthefirstablationpass
■Cleaningofdeviceexternallywhileperforming
debridementoftissueusingtheendoscopeandcap
■Performingthesecondablationpass
Focalablation ■Endoscopicidentificationoflandmarks
■Attachmentofdevicetoendoscopesuchthatitisin
12o’clockendoscopicview
■Optimaloppositiontotargetedmucosaandenergy
deliveredusing“dualtechnique”withcontinued
ablationofallareas
■Debridementoftissue,cleaningofdevice,and
secondpassofablationforallareas
Follow-up ■Immediatepostprocedureinstructionsaregiven
regardingfoodintake,painmanagement,and
antirefluxmedications.
■Follow-upafter2monthsforrepeatendoscopy,
furtherablation,orbiopsies.
POSTOPERATIVECARE
■
AfterRFAtreatment,patientsmayexperiencechestpainanddysphagiafor3to
4daysthereafter.
■
Postoperativecareincludesapainmanagementwithviscouslidocaineorliquid
acetaminophenwithnarcotic.Aliquiddietisadvisedfor24hoursafter
treatmentandthentoslowlyreturntonormaldiet.
■
Amaintenancedoseofprotonpumpinhibitor(PPI)suchasesomeprazole40mg
twiceadayduringtheentiretreatmentperiodforadequateacidsuppressionis
requiredtopromotehealing.Inaddition,sucralfate1gfourtimesadayfor2
weeksisprescribed.

■
Patientsareusuallydischargedhomeonthesamedayastheprocedure.On
occasion,severechestpainmayrequireadmissionforobservationand
optimizingpainmanagement.
■
Theyareinstructedtobefollowedupfor2monthsaftertheinitialablationwhen
theyarereassessedforfurthertreatmentorbiopsiesifneo-squamous
epitheliumisseen.Approximately3.5treatmentsessionsmaybenecessaryto
clearalldysplasticBEandthiswilldependonthelengthofsegment.
OUTCOMES
■
RFAiseffectivefortreatmentofHGDandLGD.
3
■
Inarandomizedsham-controlledtrial,completeeradicationforHGDwasnoted
in81.0%comparedto19.0%incontrols.Similarly,diseaseprogressionwas
lowerintheablationgroup(3.6%vs.16.3%).10PatientswithLGDachieved
eradicationin90.5%oftheablationgroupascomparedto22.7%ofcontrol
groupattheendof12months.DurabilityofRFAdemonstratederadicationof
dysplasiain98%and91%ofmetaplasiaattheendof3yearssinceablation
therapy.
11
COMPLICATIONS
■
RFAhasalowcomplicationratewithlowadverseevents.Chestpainand
dysphagiaarecommonlyassociatedsymptomslastingforaperiodof3to4
daysposttreatmentandresolvesspontaneouslytobaseline.
12,13
■
Stricturescanoccuronfollow-upandtheratevariesbetween0%and8%,with
longersegmentsandprecedingEMRtobehigherriskfactorsfordeveloping
them.Theycan,however,bemanagedbyendoscopicdilatation.
■

Bleedingisrare(<1%)andencounteredespeciallyinpatientsonantiplateletor
anticoagulationtherapy.
■
NoperforationsorRFA-relateddeathshavebeenreportedafterRFA.Feveris
alsoararecomplicationandcanbemanagedusingantipyretics.
■
Buriedintestinalmetaplasiaorglandshasbeenofconcernpostablationandmay
notbevisibleendoscopically.ItislessfrequentlyreportedafterRFA(0.9%)
andhighlightstheneedfordeependoscopicbiopsies,whichneedtobe
carefullyreviewedbythepathologist.
14
REFERENCES
1.ShaheenNJ,CrosbyMA,BozymskiEM,etal.Istherepublicationbiasinthereportingofcancer
riskinBarrett’sesophagus?Gastroenterology.2000;119:333–338.
2.Hvid-JensenF,PedersenL,DrewesAM,etal.Incidenceofadenocarcinomaamongpatientswith
Barrett’sesophagus.NEnglJMed.2011;365:1375–1383.
3.AmericanGastroenterologicalAssociation,SpechlerSJ,SharmaP,etal.American
GastroenterologicalAssociationmedicalpositionstatementonthemanagementofBarrett’sesophagus.
Gastroenterology.2011;140:1084–1091.
4.NelsenEM,HawesRH,IyerPG.DiagnosisandmanagementofBarrett’sesophagus.SurgClin
NorthAm.2012;92:1135–1154.
5.ChakA,Ochs-BalcomH,FalkG,etal.FamilialityinBarrett’sesophagus,adenocarcinomaof
theesophagus,andadenocarcinomaofthegastroesophagealjunction.CancerEpidemiolBiomarkers
Prev.2006;15:1668–1673.
6.ASGEStandardsofPracticeCommittee,EvansJA,EarlyDS,etal.Theroleofendoscopyin
Barrett’sesophagusandotherpremalignantconditionsoftheesophagus.GastrointestEndosc.
2012;76:1087–1094.
7.SharmaP,DentJ,ArmstrongD,etal.Thedevelopmentandvalidationofanendoscopicgrading
systemforBarrett’sesophagus:thePragueC&Mcriteria.Gastroenterology.2006;131:1392–1399.
8.EndoscopicClassificationReviewGroup.Updateontheparisclassificationofsuperficial
neoplasticlesionsinthedigestivetract.Endoscopy.2005;37:570–578.
9.LevineDS,HaggittRC,BlountPL,etal.AnendoscopicbiopsyprotocolcandifferentiatehighgradedysplasiafromearlyadenocarcinomainBarrett’sesophagus.Gastroenterology.1993;105:40–50.
10.ShaheenNJ,SharmaP,OverholtBF,etal.RadiofrequencyablationinBarrett’sesophaguswith
dysplasia.NEnglJMed.2009;360:2277–2288.
11.ShaheenNJ,OverholtBF,SamplinerRE,etal.Durabilityofradiofrequencyablationin
Barrett’sesophaguswithdysplasia.Gastroenterology.2011;141:460–468.
12.SharmaVK.AblationofBarrett’sesophagususingtheHALOradiofrequencyablationsystem.
TechniquesGastrointestEndosc.2010;12:26–34.
13.vanVilsterenFG,BergmanJJ.Endoscopictherapyusingradiofrequencyablationfor
esophagealdysplasiaandcarcinomainBarrett’sesophagus.GastrointestEndoscClinNAm.

2010;20:55–74,vi.
14.GrayNA,OdzeRD,SpechlerSJ.BuriedmetaplasiaafterendoscopicablationofBarrett’s
esophagus:asystematicreview.AmJGastroenterol.2011;106:1899–1908;quiz1909.
15.FrantzDJ,DellonES,ShaheenNJ.RadiofrequencyablationofBarrett’sesophagus.Techniques
GastrointestEndosc.2010;12:100–107.

Chapter11
EndoscopicMucosal
ResectionforBarrett
Neoplasia
ShajanPeterC.MelWilcox
KlausMönkemüller
DEFINITION
■
Barrettesophagus(BE)isastrongriskfactorforesophagealadenocarcinoma.
1
■
TheannualriskofBEprogressiontoadenocarcinomarangesfrom01.12%to
0.61%.
1,2
■
Thetraditionaltreatmentofchoicefor“resectable”esophagealadenocarcinoma
isesophagectomy.
■
However,surgicalresectionisstillassociatedwithsignificantmortalityand
morbidity,eveninhigh-volumecentersandespeciallyinelderlyorpoor
surgicalcandidates.
3
■
Thus,duringthelasttwodecades,patientswithearlycancerorthosewithhigh-
gradedysplasiahavebeensuccessfullytreatedwithendoscopicresection
methods.
4,5
■
Themostcommonmethodusedisendoscopicmucosalresection(EMR)or
“mucosectomy.”
4,5

DIFFERENTIALDIAGNOSIS
■
Thedifferentialdiagnosisofmucosalneoplasiaofthedistalesophagusis
narrow.Themostcommonmalignantneoplasiaofthedistalesophagusis
adenocarcinoma,followedbysquamouscellcancer.
4,5
■
Proximalstomachcancersuchascardiacorfundicadenocarcinomaextending
intotheesophagusmaybedifficulttodifferentiatefromdistalesophageal
adenocarcinoma.
■
Submucosaltumorssuchasgastrointestinal(GI)tumors,spindlecelltumors,
lipoma,andleiomyomaareeasilydifferentiatedfrommucosallesionsasthese
tumorsgenerallyhaveanormaloverlyingmucosa.
PATIENTHISTORYANDPHYSICALFINDINGS
■
MostpatientswithBarrett’sneoplasiadonothaveanyspecificsymptomsand
BEisdiscoveredincidentallyduringanupperGIendoscopyperformedfor
theevaluationofgastroesophagealrefluxsymptoms,dyspepsia,orabdominal
pain.
6
■
However,Barrett’sneoplasiaismorecommoninpatientswiththefollowing
characteristics:male,centralobesity,Caucasian,ageolderthan50years,
tobaccouse,andchronicgastroesophagealrefluxdisease(GERD).
6
■
AlthoughrefluxofacidisacommonoccurrenceinBE,ahighproportionofBE
patientsdenyahistoryofrefluxsymptoms.
7
■
Therefore,anypatientundergoingupperendoscopyshouldbecarefully
investigatedforcolumnar-linedepitheliumandintestinalmetaplasiaofthe
distalesophagus,withspecialattentiontopatientswiththeriskfactors
mentionedearlier.

IMAGINGANDOTHERDIAGNOSTICSTUDIES
■
RadiologicstudiesdonotplayaroleintheevaluationofBEunlessthereisa
stricturepresent(benignormalignant).Inthisinstance,abarium
esophagogramcanbehelpfultodeterminethelengthandcharacteristicsof
thestenosis.
■
Althoughcomputedaxialtomographyisusefultoevaluateforlungmetastasis
andmediastinalandperigastriclymphnodeinvolvementinesophageal
adenocarcinoma,itsroleinpatientswithearlyBarrettneoplasiaisnegligible,
asmostofthesepatientshavelocaldisease,whichdoesnotextendbeyondthe
submucosaoftheesophagus.
■
PatientswithBarrett’scancerinvadingthesubmucosa(sm1)haveaverylow
riskoflymphnodemetastasisandthusareidealcandidatesforEMR.
4–6
■
Inthepast,endoscopicultrasound(EUS)wasusedtodeterminethedepthofGI
layersinvolvementinearlyBarrettneoplasia.
8
■
However,thesensitivityandspecificityofEUSforearlyBarrettneoplasiaare
lowandtheresultscanbemisleading.
8
■
ThemainstayofdiagnosisofBEiswithlightendoscopy,ideallyusinghighdefinitionendoscopesandequipment.
9
■
Itisveryimportanttomeasuretheproximaldistanceofextensionofcylindrical-
typeepitheliumintotheesophagus.TheextentofBEsegmentshouldbe
definedusingthePragueC&Mclassificationincludingthelengthofthe
circumferentialsegment(C)andthemaximalextentoftheBEsegment(M).
10
■
Theuseofvariousstainingagentsanddyes(chromoendoscopy)suchas
methyleneblue(FIG1)andindigocarmineoragentssuchasaceticacid
(FIG2)enhancesthemucosalpitpatternanalysis(seethefollowingtext)and

thusfacilitatesthedetectionhigh-gradedysplasiaandcarcinoma.
9
■
OtherimagingmodalitiesthatmighthelpindelineatingBEarenarrowband
imaging(NBI)(FIG3),autofluorescenceimaging,andconfocallaser
endoscopy.

■
Magnificationendoscopyisalsoimportanttocharacterizethemucosalsurface
andpitpattern(FIG4).
■
ThemostwidespreadclassificationusedtocategorizethepitpatterninBEisthe
Endoclassification(adaptedfromS.E.Kudo).
11
■
Thisclassificationcategorizestheopeningofthepitsintoround(I),stellaror
asteroid(II)(seeFIG2),tubularelongated(IIIL),tubularshortorround
(IIIS)(seeFIG1),gyrusorsulcusbranched(IV)(seeFIG4),andirregularor
amorphous(V)(FIG5).

■
TypesI,II,andIIIpitpatternsare“benign,”whereaspitpatterntypesIVandV
aremorecommonlypresentinadvancedneoplasiaorcarcinoma.
■
Chromoendoscopyisperformedtoaidinobtainingdirected(i.e.,targeted)
biopsiespriortomucosectomytodefinethepreciseextentofneoplastic
involvement.
■
Targetedbiopsiesareobtainedfromvisibleabnormalities,followedbyfourquadrantbiopsiesofevery1to2cmoftheBEsegment(Seattleprotocol;see
Chapter10)andtheseshouldbereviewedbyadedicatedGIpathologist.
ENDOSCOPICMANAGEMENT
■
ThetwomostimportantindicationsforEMRofBarrett’sneoplasiaare
diagnosticandtherapeutic.
5,6,12
■
EMRcanbegenerallyattemptedifthelesionsaresmallerthan20mmin
diameter.
■
Endoscopicsubmucosaldissection(ESD)shouldbereservedforlargerlesions.
■
However,ESDisatechniquethathasbeenmainlyusedforearlysquamouscell
canceroftheesophagus.TheresultsofESDforBarrettneoplasiaarestill
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
