Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3753_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
24 Мб
Скачать
258 M. Castillo-Sang
with biventricular failure VA-ECMO is a reliable approach (but does not offload the left ventricle), while those with isolated left ventricular failure can be stabilized with either Impella (Abiomed, Danvers, Massachusetts, USA), IABP or another temporary percutaneous left ventricular assist device.
Mitral valve pathology
The type/etiology of mitral valve pathology is very relevant in the early stages of evaluation of the patient in cardiogenic shock. In general, pathology can be primary (including endocardi­tis) or secondary mitral valve regurgitation; mitral regurgitation or stenosis; mitral prosthesis malfunction (Table 2).
Different forms of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery
There are different techniques for minim ally invasive mitral valve surgery that vary by center and surgeon. In all, in the United States approximately 23–25% of all mitral valve oper­ations are performed minimally invasive with 8% robotic assisted and the rest with other forms of minimally invasive techniques, predominantly right minithoracotomy [11, 12]. In Germany 55% of all mitral valve operations were performed minimally invasive while in Italy up to 71% of all mitral operations were performed minimally invasive based on a multicenter study [13, 14]. In the United Kingdom, based on study including three centers 27% of all mitral valve operations were performed minimally invasive between 2008 and 2016 [15].
The endoscopic approach to mitral valve surgery
We perform our operations endoscopically assisted using a 5 mm 30-degree thoracoscope positioned in the second intercostal space and mid clavicular line allowing us to create a small
1.5–2-inches right chest working incision in the 4th intercostal space lateral to the nipple in men and lateral to the breast in women. We nd that
in order to insert mitral prostheses into the chest without undue deformation the minimal size incision is 1.5 inches (Fig. 2A and B). We use a deployable crossclamp (Cygnet clamp, Peters Surgical, Bobigny France) applied through the right minithoracotomy. A 5 mm port in the 4th parasternal space is used for an atrial lift retractor.
Contraindications to endoscopic mitral surgery approach in cardiogenic shock
In the past many have deemed a prior right chest operation as a contraindication to endoscopic minimally invasive heart surger y, but we nd that this is relative to the type of previous oper­ation. If the patient had undergone a video assisted lung resection an endoscopic mitral valve surgery is possible within the reasonable time it takes to take down adhesions. We have routinely performed endoscopic mitral valve surgery in patients who underwent right thora­cotomies, but the time spent carefully taking down lung adhesions may prove too long in the setting of cardiogenic shock. Patients who had empyema and mechanical or chemical pleu­rodesis on the right side are true contraindica­tions [12].
We perform the endoscopic mitral operation
in patients with systemic or near-systemic pul­monary artery pressures as well as those with a previous open-heart operation as this has been proven to be safe in redo sternotomies and in minimally invasive approaches [16, 17]. One true anatomical contraindication for endoscopic mitral surgery in cardiogenic shock is the pres­ence of severe mitral annular calcication unless there is availability of an off label transcatheter balloon expandible valve with direct surgical implantation into mitral annular calci
cation (MAC), but we have not experienced this oper­ation in the setting of cardiogenic shock.
Our experience
Our decision-making process in patients pre­senting with severe mitral stenosis or regurgita­tion, respiratory failure, on inotropic/pressor
Endoscopic Mitral Surgery in Cardiogenic Shock 259
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Table 2 Etiology and management of severe mitral pathology in cardiogenic shock
Etiology Pulmonary
Primary MR Start if
Infectious MR
Secondary MR
Bioprosthetic valve MR or MS (structural deterioration)
Mechanical valve MR or MS
Rheumatic MS
Rheumatic MR
Etiological classication of cardiogenic shock accompanying severe mitral valve disease. TMVr = transcatheter mitral valve repair. TMVR = transcatheter mitral valve replacement. PTMB = percutaneous transcatheter mitral balloon valvuloplasty. MR = mitral regurgitation. MS = mitral stenosis. RV = right ventricle. SVO2 = mixed venous oxygen saturation
vasodilator
depressed RV and/or PAS 2/3 systemic
Start if depressed RV and/or PAS 2/3 systemic
Start if depressed RV and/or PAS 2/3 systemic
Start if depressed RV and/or PAS 2/3 systemic
Start if depressed RV and/or PAS 2/3 systemic
Start if depressed RV and/or PAS 2/3 systemic
Start if depressed RV and/or PAS 2/3 systemic
Inotropic support Mechanical
Implement early (SBP >90 mmHg with elevated lactate, large base decit or SVO2 <60%)
Implement early (SBP >90 mmHg with elevated lactate, large base decit or SVO2 <60%)
Implement early (SBP >90 mmHg with elevated lactate, large base decit or SVO2 <60%)
Implement early (SBP >90 mmHg with elevated lactate, large base decit or SVO2 <60%)
Implement early (SBP >90 mmHg with elevated lactate, large base decit or SVO2 <60%)
Implement early (SBP >90 mmHg with elevated lactate, large base decit or SVO2 <60%)
Implement early (SBP >90 mmHg with elevated lactate, large base decit or SVO2 <60%)
support
When 1 high­dose or 2 inotropes with SVO2 <60%
When 1 high­dose or 2 inotropes with SVO2 <60%
When 1 high­dose or 2 inotropes with SVO2 <60%
When 1 high­dose or 2 inotropes with SVO2 <60%
When 1 high­dose or 2 inotropes with SVO2 <60%
When 1 high­dose or 2 inotropes with SVO2 <60%
When 1 high­dose or 2 inotropes with SVO2 <60%
Transcatheter (TMVr/R)
TEER option Endoscopic
No TMVr/R option
TEER option Endoscopic
Valve in valve option
No TMVr/R option
Primary PTMB if criteria met
No TMVr/R option
Surgical therapy
option
Endoscopic option
option
Endoscopic option if no TMVR
Endoscopic option
Endoscopic option if no PTMB
Endoscopic option
support and/or mechanical circulatory support hinges on the viability of the patient, expected quality of life and patients wishes. A clear and candid conversation with the patient and family about the expected risks and benets of a mitral valve operation under the above circumstances is paramount.
Our experience in managing mitral valve
patients in cardiogenic shock in the last two years
is summarized in Table 3. We have encountered patients in different levels of shock, some requiring only an inotrope and/or pressor while others required advanced mechanical support. The etiology behind the mitral valve pathology varied, the most common being ischemic mitral regurgitation (secondary MR) with an acute on chronic presentation due to decompensation. The predominant mechanical support was IABP
260 M. Castillo-Sang
AB
Fig. 2 A and B Surgeons view of the operative eld using the 5 mm 30-degree angled endoscope
Table 3 Two-year experience of endoscopic mitral valve surgery in cardiogenic shock
Patient Age Etiology Procedure Pharmacologic
1 52 Papillary rupture-ischemic MR MVR Pressor + Inotrope Impella
2 68 Acute on chronic ischemic MR MVR Pressor + Inotrope Impella Yes
3 64 Acute on chronic ischemic MR Redo-
4 70 Acute presentation of chronic
Rheumatic MR
5 69 Acute presentation of chronic
Rheumatic MR
6 65 Acute on chronic ischemic MR MVR/
7 27 Endocarditis acute MR MVR Pressor + Inotrope None Yes
8 31 Endocarditis acute MR MVR Pressor + Inotrope None Yes
9 57 Acute presentation of Rheumatic
MR/MS
10 58 Acute presentation of RheumaticMSMVR Pressor IABP Yes
MVR
MVR/ TVR
MVR/ TVR
TVR
MVR Inotrope IABP Yes
support
Pressor + Inotrope Impella Yes
Pressor + Inotrope IABP No
Pressor + Inotrope Impella Yes
Pressor + Inotrope IABP Yes
Mechanical support
VA-ECMO
Nitric oxide
Yes
11 50 Papillary rupture non-ischemic MVr Pressor + Inotrope IABP No
12 62 Endocarditis + chronic primary MR MVR/
TVr
13 53 Acute on chronic ischemic MR MVR/
TVr
Unpublished data of endoscopic mitral valve surgeries performed in the setting of cardiogenic shock and mitral valve disease. MR, mitral regurgitation. IABP, intra-aortic balloon pump. MVR, mitral valve replacement. MVr, mitral valve repair. TVR, tricuspid valve repair. ABE, acute bacterial endocarditis. VA ECMO, veno-arterial extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation. MS, mitral stenosis. Impella (Abiomed, Danvers, Massachusetts, USA)
Pressor + Inotrope IABP Yes
Inotrope IABP Yes
Endoscopic Mitral Surgery in Cardiogenic Shock 261
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
followed by Impella (Abiomed, Danvers, Mas­sachusetts, USA). There were no operative mortalities, and all patients were discharged from the hospital. One patient died at 4 months from recidivism of IVDA, 12 were alive at follow-up up to 1 year. There were no operative strokes and one patient required hemodialysis postopera­tively for one month.
2 Operative Considerations
Anesthesia considerations
There are several considerations for the anes­thesia team managing the cardiogenic shock patient undergoing endoscopic mitral valve sur­gery. An important one is whether a double­lumen or single-lumen endotracheal tube will be used. We routinely use single-lumen tubes.
On induction of anesthesia, we focus on right ventricular protection for those without mechanical or with only an IABP. We prevent hypotension and once the patient is orotracheally intubated, or when connected to the anesthesia circuit if previously intubated, the inhaled nitric oxide is started 40 PPM if the systolic pulmonary artery pressure is greater than 2/3 systemic or at 20 PPM between 50% and 2/3 systemic (Fig. 3A and B). This dosing is based on the response we have observed in the operating room in acute
settings with active pulmonary edema compli­cating right ventricular dysfunction.
Cannulation strategy
If we have the advantage of a preoperative CT scan to evaluate the aorto-iliac vasculature we opt to cannulate via the femoral vessels or alternatively via the right axillary artery (for those with prohibitive aorto-iliac disease). Our axillary cannulation consists of a pursestring on the artery and direct cannulation with a 15 or 17 Fr cannula with transesophageal echo guidance to identify the guidewire in the ascending or descending aorta. In cannulating the axillary artery, one must have a left arm arterial line, but we request bilateral arm arterial lines. The venous cannulation is universally via the com­mon femoral vein with a two-stage 23Fr to 27Fr cannula (23Fr for BSA 1.6 m2; 25Fr for 1.6–
2.2m2; 2Fr for 2.2m2 or higher) (Fig. 4). We favor the bicaval cannulas such as the Medtronic Bio-Medicus NextGen (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA). In patients supported with VA-ECMO we convert the cannulation to the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit and at the end of the operation, depending on the myocardial contractility weaning off bypass we decannulate or convert again to VA-ECMO.
The mitral valve replacement is performed with prosthesis selection based on standard EACTS or AHA guidelines. For those patients
Fig. 3 A intraoperative vital signs at the time of induction of a patient supported with inotropes showing systemic pressures preserved, pulmonary artery pressures
(105/50 mmHg) over 2/3 systemic and an elevated CVP of 27 mmHg. B This patient was supported with an IABP and inhaled nitric oxide
262 M. Castillo-Sang
Fig. 4 Femoral canulation strategy
on inotropic or IABP support and less than 60 years old we select a mechanical prosthesis if no contraindications for anticoagulation exist. For those with deeper hemodynamic compromise requiring Impella (Abiomed, Danvers, Mas­sachusetts, USA), VA-ECMO or both, we elect to place a bioprosthesis. The argument for the latter is that with full unloading of the ven­tricular preload there will be stasis and poor washing of the prosthesis which may lead to thrombosis [18].
Cardioplegia
We exclusively use Del Nido Cardioplegia for all minimally invasive mitral valve operations. In the setting of cardiogenic shock having adequate cardiac protection to minimize myocardial dys­function is paramount, but it is also important to abbreviate the crossclamp time. Our arresting dose is 1,000 to 1,200 ml and redosing is
performed at 60– 70 min with 300–500 ml extra if 30 or more minutes of work are required.
Application of the crossclamp can be chal­lenging in cases where there is an indwelling Impella pump (Abiomed, Danvers, Mas­sachusetts, USA). In our experience applying a soft insert crossclamp such as the Cygnet clamp (Peters Surgical, Bobigny France) results in better occlusion of the aorta. One should turn to bypass mode the Impella device and advance it as much as possible into the ventricle so as to crossclamp only the smaller diameter driveline. Alternatively, the Impella can be pulled back into the descending aorta to apply the crossclamp understanding that it will not be reinserted and that a new one or an alternative mechanical support will be needed at the end of the case. In cases where the ascending aorta cannot be clamped and there is no aortic insufciency brillatory arrest with hypothermia is also an acceptable option in the absence of Impella pump.
Endoscopic Mitral Surgery in Cardiogenic Shock 263
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Fig. 5 Preoperative chest X-ray of a patient presenting in cardiogenic shock and acute severe mitral regurgitation secondary to papillary muscle rupture showing pulmonary
Volume and coagulopathy management on cardiopulmonary bypass
Patients undergoing emergent mitral valve oper­ations in the setting of acute cardiovascular decompensation are volume overloaded (Fig. 5). Managing their volume overload improves pul­monary function, right ventricular recovery as well as hepatic congestion increasing the proba­bility of renal recovery and weaning off inotropic and/or mechanical support. Alleviating hepatic congestion will also improve the coagulation prole and risk of postoperative bleeding. For patients with longer standing heart failure and hepatic congestion with documented coagulopa­thy and on preoperative anticoagulation we will prime the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit with
edema. A pulmonary artery catheter, a percutaneous temporary LVAD and an endotracheal tube are in place
fresh frozen plasma typically 3–4 units. We also aggressively ultraltrate and remove volume from the patient between 2–5 L depending on the preoperative condition.
Conduct of replacement
Mitral valve replacement should be chordal sparing and the choice of valve prosthesis is a result of a discussion with the patient/family and clinical situation. We arrest the heart with ante­grade cardioplegia and enter the heart through the interatrial groove. Once the atrial exposure is achieved using the USB Medical HV retractor (USB-Medical, Hatboro, PA, USA) the anterior leaet of the mitral valve is resected preserving the commissural and all posterior chordae. If the
264 M. Castillo-Sang
Fig. 6 Implanted bioprosthesis using an endoscopic technique
replacement is performed for an ischemic/ruptured papillary muscle it is impor­tant to resect all non-viable tissue and if neces­sary recreate the chords using ePTFE (Fig. 6). It is important to have appropriate chest and mediastinal drainage postoperatively as pleural and pericardial effusions can be common in the postoperative period. On elective cases we deploy a 24 Fr soft silastic drain in the peri­cardium through the oblique sinus and a 19 Fr in the right pleural cavity. For emergent cases we use two 24 Fr drains in the pleural cavity and one
hemodynamic stability and recovery. For patients with biventricular dysfunction and pulmonary hypertension a combination of epinephrine, mil­rinone and inhaled nitric oxide are our preferred combination. Patients will be transported to the intensive care unit on inhaled nitric oxide for a wean that will depend on the pulmonary artery pressures and right sided lling pressures. Once the patient is capable of taking oral sildenalwe start it and continue this treatment if the pul­monary artery pressures and right ventricular function dictate it.
in the pericardium.
weaned off onto inotropes alone removal of these devices is important to avoid the need for anti-
3 Postoperative Management
coagulation posto peratively. We universally perform a groin cutdowns to remove devices such as Impella, IABP and VA-ECMO cannulas
Postoperative inotropic support and fate of the mechanical support
and are prepared to perform a thrombectomy in all these cases. Our rationale is that attempting a
percutaneous approach for removal may lead to Once the endoscopic mitral operation is com­pleted, if the patient is not mechanically sup­ported, judicious use of inotropes allows for
complications that can jeopardize a favorable
outcome for the patient. In removing mechanical
support that requires anticoagulation one also
For those on mechanical support that can be
Endoscopic Mitral Surgery in Cardiogenic Shock 265
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
decreases the risk for acute blood loss anemia and transfusions which can perseverate right ventricular dysfunction.
4 Severe Mitral Valve Stenosis
PULMONARY EDEMA
DIASTOLIC + SYSTOLIC
HEART FAILURE AND
SHOCK
ACUTE ON CHRONIC
SYSTOLIC HEART
FAILURE AND
CARDIOGENIC SHOCK
CHRONIC SECONDARY
MR WITH ACUTE
EXACERBATION (NEW
AMI, WORSENING
LVEF)
CHRONIC RHEUMATIC
MR (VOLUME
DECOMPENSATION)
CHRONIC PRIMARY MR
(ACUTE WORSENING
OF MR)
Patients presenting acutely with decompensated severe mitral valve stenosis are typically in diastolic heart failure with pulmonary edema and a degree of low cardiac output state which negates afterload reduction but requires support to improve forward cardiac ow and decrease pulmonary congestion. This often cannot be achieved with pharmacological agents alone and thus needs mechanical support, typically in the form of an intra-aortic counter pulsation balloon. In addition, many of these patients will go into atrial brillation which places them in a low cardiac output state despite of preserved or
ACUTE SYSTOLIC HEART
CARDIOGENIC SHOCK
ACUTE ISCHEMIA WITH
PAPILLARY RUPTURE
slightly depressed LVEF. We have experienced a
systolic function deterioration in these patients
perhaps also secondary to a systemic inamma-
tory response that compounds the diastolic fail-
ure and ultimately leads to more advanced
hemodynamic support such as Impella
ACUTE PRESENTATION
OF MITRAL VALVE
DISEASE
PULMONARY EDEMA
DIASTOLIC FAILURE AND LOW CARDIAC
OUTPUT
FAILURE AND
INFECTIOUS ACUTE
DAMAGE (CORONARY
EMBOLIZATION)
CARDIOGENIC AND
SEPTIC SHOCK
RHEUMATIC MITRAL
+
STENOSIS MR WITH
-
NORMAL OR
DEPRESSED LVEF
REGURGITATION OF
ANY NATURE WITH
(Abiomed, Danvers, Massachusetts, USA) and/or
VA-ECMO implantation. Others have reported
the presentation of severe mitral stenosis as car-
diogenic shock with variable outcomes (Fig. 7A–
C) [19]. Atrial brillation is poorly tolerated in
mitral stenosis and leads to further decrement of
the cardiac output and use of inotropic drugs
often precipitates this circumstance [20]. For this
reason, it is important to identify the need and
institute mechanical support early to maintain a
better hemodynamic state and preserve end organ
function. In these situations, early operation is
the key to having a favorable outcome.
MITRAL
NORMAL OR
DEPRESSED LVEF
Fig. 7 A Intraoperative transesophageal echo showing smoke in the left atrium and a poorly opening mitral valve. B Severe mitral stenosis with color ow. C Intraoperative picture of the severely stenotic rheumatic mitral valve
266 M. Castillo-Sang
Patient with decompensated presentation of mitral stenosis require management in the intensive care unit with invasive monitoring in the form of pulmonary artery catheter, arterial line and foley catheter. Goal directed therapies need to be instituted to maintain adequate cardiac output, minimize pulmonary edema and to pre­serve the right ventricular function [21, 22]. In doing this end-organ function is preserved in the kidneys and liver. Maintaining mean arterial pressure of at least 65 mmHg, a cardiac index of 2 L/min/m
2
and a central venous pressure below 15 mmHg are important goals. Often times these patients have signicant pulmonary hypertension and elevated pulmonary vascular resistance which taxes the right ventricular function and can lead to cardio-renal syndrome. We are relatively liberal in the use of inhaled pulmonary vasodilators such as inhaled iloprost or nitric oxide (for non-intubated patients) or nitric oxide (in intubated patients) to support the right ven­tricle [23, 24]. We also favor the use of milrinone for pulmonary vasodi lation if tolerated by the hemodynamics and cardiac rhythm without inducing vasoplegia or atrial brillation. For those with a uremic syndrome and vo lume overload it is important to institute renal replacement therapy and improve the overall metabolic state of the patient as well as to improve platelet function.
The rst-line management of mitral stenosis is percutaneous transcatheter mitral balloon valvu­loplasty (PTMB) and this has been used even in
the setting of cardiogenic shock [25]. Patients with rheumatic stenosis and accompanying regurgitation or valve calcication are not can­didates to PTMB and in these patients our approach for isolated mitral or mitral and tri­cuspid valve surgery is universally through the right chest endoscopically with a 1.5– 2-inch incision at the 4th intercostal space and with a 5 mm 30-degree angled scope in the 2nd inter­costal space mid-clavicular line (Fig. 8) with a femoral vessel cutdown of 1–2-inch incision which has been proven to be safe and effective in rheumatic mitral stenosis [26]. This is the case even in emergency operations and reoperations with no sternotomy conversions and an average of 5–7 such operations per year.
We would be remiss not to emphasize that it is paramount that not only the surgeon be com­fortable with elective complex endoscopic mitral valve surgery, but also the anesthesia, perfusion and nursing members of the team as many of these operations take place outside of regular work hours and are performed perhaps with less familiarized members of the team. To this end we recommend that everyone in the cardiac team gets experience performing endoscopic valve surgery.
5 Ruptured Papillary Muscle
CHRONIC SECONDARY MR
WITH ACUTE
EXACERBATION (NEW
AMI, WORSENING LVEF)
ACUTE ON CHRONIC
SYSTOLIC HEART FAILURE
AND
CARDIOGENIC SHOCK
CHRONIC RHEUMATIC MR
(VOLUME
DECOMPENSATION)
CHRONIC PRIMARY MR
(ACUTE WORSENING OF
MR)
PULMONARY EDEMA
DIASTOLIC + SYSTOLIC
HEART FAILURE AND
SHOCK
ACUTE SYSTOLIC HEART
FAILURE AND
CARDIOGENIC SHOCK
ACUTE ISCHEMIA WITH
PAPILLARY RUPTURE
ACUTE PRESENTATION OF
MITRAL VALVE DISEASE
INFECTIOUS ACUTE
DAMAGE
(EMBOLIZATION)
CARDIOGENIC AND SEPTIC
SHOCK
DIASTOLIC FAILURE AND
RHEUMATIC MITRAL
+
STENOSIS MR WITH
-
NORMAL OR DEPRESSED
LVEF
PULMONARY EDEMA
LOW CARDIAC OUTPUT
MITRAL REGURGITATION
OF ANY NATURE WITH
NORMAL OR DEPRESSED
LVEF
Endoscopic Mitral Surgery in Cardiogenic Shock 267
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Fig. 8 Postoperative picture 10 days after surgery showing the endoscopic approach. A =5 mm 30-degree endoscope. B =Atrial lift retractor port. C =Chest drain