Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3753_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
24 Мб
Скачать
Endoscopic Vein Harvest Using an Open System (Terumo®) 121
Artery clip
Fig. 12 Grabbing the LSV
Fig. 13 Tributary on right
button (this will advance from the right-hand side) so the tributary sits in the slit between the bipolar tips of the V cutter (Fig. 13).
Ensure the ground electrode on the V cutter is
placed against the tunnel wall. Slowly advance
the V cutter button forwards whilst pressing the diathermy foot pedal until the tributary is cau­terised and cut. Similarly, if there is a left sided tributary, rotate the harvester anticlockwise and the V cutter will advance from the left (Fig. 14).
122 D. Croft et al.
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Fig. 14 Tributary on left
If haemostasis is not achieved at this point, then spot cautery can be used. This is done by releasing the vein from the V keeper and positioning the ground electrodes of the V cutter into the area of the tunnel wall that is bleeding. Move the blue cautery switch across laterally and hold whilst pressing the foot pedal to cauterise the area, releasing after 2 s.
The grey wiper ring on the handle of the harvester operates a wiper blade which cleans the endoscope lens if required.
There is the option to cauterise and cut by performing tributary isolation. This is achieved by releasing the LSV from the V keeper and capturing the specic tributary. If the tributary is on the right, insert into the V keeper with the V lock at the bottom. For a left sided tributary insert the vein with the V lock at the top. Fol­low the previous steps for rotating the har­vester and advancing the V cutter.
Continue the harvesting process until all the tributaries have been cauterised and cut. Release the vein from the V keeper and turn off the CO
and light source. The vein can
2
now be divided proximally in the thigh or
distally (if the lower leg vein is harvested) and then pulled out through the incision.
After ligating or clipping the tributaries, ush the vein as per institutional protocol to remove any potential clots. Evacuate any blood from the tunnel before closing the skin incision with a subcuticular suture and the stab inci­sion with an interrupted suture (See Video 3).
Note: There may be occasions when extending the incision is necessary to access tethered tributaries at the entrance of the tunnel. Similarly have a low threshold to open certain points along the harvest site if difculties arise.
4 Traps, Tips and Tricks
4.1 Bleeding
If haemostasis is not achieved internally by spot cautery, bleeding within the tunnel may obstruct the view of the operator. In this case remove the harvester from the tunnel and apply pressure to the area externally for approximately 3 to
Endoscopic Vein Harvest Using an Open System (Terumo®) 123
Video 3 Harvest of LSV (https://doi.org/10.1007/000-a7f)
5 minutes then continue (Fig. 15). A suction catheter attached to a cell salvage system can be used to evacuate blood from the tunnel (Fig. 16). If bleeding persists then it may be necessary to insert a drain (as per surgeonsguidance or local protocol).
Tips to avoid bleeding
During the dissection, advance the dissector forwards then backwards, this allows the tunnel to inate with CO
thus enabling a better visual
2
eld and will reduce the risk of damage to the vein, bleeding or fat disruption.
During harvesting keep the vein in the middle of the tunnel and avoid dragging the harvester on the bottom, this will avoid bleeding and fat disturbance.
4.2 Large or Bifurcating Tributaries
These can sometime tether the vein and it can be difcult to dissect. Manipulation of the dissector within the tunnel manually can enable the oper­ator to accurately direct the tip of the dissector around such tethered tributaries. Large tributaries may sometimes bleed after cauterising and
cutting which can obstruct the view of the operator, therefore leaving them till the end when all other tributaries have been divided, may prevent this. Note: It may be helpful to perform tributary isolation to have better exposure of the large tributary. Alternatively, the operator can divide the tributary by performing a stab incision and grab the large tributary with an artery clip.
4.3 Fat in Tunnel
Fat disru ption, particularly at the beginning of the harvest when inserting the harvester or producing a false tunnel, can obstruct the view and cause endless problems with the harvesting process. If this occurs the harvester will need to be removed, cleaned of fat debris and reinserted. It is important to disrupt as little fat as possible ensuring a clean dissection and thus a fat free tunnel.
Tip
To ensure minimal fat disruption keep the cone tip in the plane between the vein and fat during the posterior and anterior dissection.
Fat stuck to the tip of the harvester can
sometimes be removed by extending the V
124 D. Croft et al.
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Fig. 15 Dealing with branch bleeding
keeper in the hope it will become dislodged from the end of the harvester to allow the harvesting process to progress (See Video 4).
4.4 Superficial Saphenous Vein
In our experience, these veins tend to be dif­cult to dissect due to their adherence to the anterior tunnel wall. Performing a posterior dis­section rst can make the anterior dissection easier. Thin legs and vein adherence can be challenging to dissect as too much pushing may cause damage to the vein and there is a danger of perforating the skin with the tip of the dissector.
Tip
When it is difcult to advance the dissector through the fat it may be necessary to adopt a twisting action side to side to aid
advancement whilst applying external counter­pressure at the tip of the dissector. In these sit­uations, have a low threshold to perform an open vein harvest.
4.5 Orientation
The camera can inadvertently twist which will produce an incorrect position of the vein on the monitor. To avoid this the operator must main­tain correct positioning of equipment during the harvesting process to ensure optimum orien­tation of the image (Fig. 17).
4.6 CO2Blockage
Fat and debris may occlude or impair CO insufation, if this occurs remove the harvester
2
Endoscopic Vein Harvest Using an Open System (Terumo®) 125
Fig. 16 Use of suction
and clean the end with a damp swab. The CO tube on the harvester may also be evacuated by using a 20 ml syringe of air.
4.7 Thermal Spread
Dissect enough tributary length to avoid the spread of thermal damage when cauterising and cutting tributaries.
4.8 Twisted/Tangled Vein
If the vein becomes twisted around or tangled within the V Keeper, then release the V Lock and carefully free the vein. Once freed, recapture the vein in the V Keeper and continue with the harvest. In the event of a tangled or twisted vein
around the V Keeper, where the view is
2
obstructed by blood or debris, open the leg to safely free the vein under direct vision.
5 Post-operative Complications
5.1 CO2Embolus
Although rare, carbon dioxide insufation during EVH can enter a tributary or damaged saphenous vein. This is potentially fatal and can cause CO bubbles to collect in the right atrium (which may be visible on trans-oesophageal echocardiogram (TOE)) and may result in changes to the haemodynamic status of the patient. In such circumstances discontinue CO immediately and treat the haemodynami c status of the patient accordingly [4].
insufation
2
2
126 D. Croft et al.
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Video 4 Traps, tips and tricks (https://doi.org/10.1007/000-a7j)
Fig. 17 Correct orientation
Endoscopic Vein Harvest Using an Open System (Terumo®) 127
5.2 Saphenous Nerve Injury
In the thigh there can be altered sensation and increased pain from injury to the medial femoral cutaneous nerve. Similarly, the medial surface of the lower leg can be affected when harvesting LSV from below the knee. These symptoms are temporary and should resolve in approximately 6 months [5].
As with open vein harvesting haematoma and infection are post-operative complications and treatment will follow institutional guidelines.
References
1. Zenati MA, Bhatt DL, Bakaeen FG, Stock EM,
Biswas K, Gaziano M, Kelly RF, Tseng EE, Bitondo J, Quin JA, Hossein Almassi G, Haime M, Hattler B, DeMatt, E, Scrymgeour A. GD Huang 2019
Randomized trail of endoscopic or open vein-graft harvesting for coronary-artery bypass. 2019;380:132–
41.
2. Health and Safety Executive.:Back Pain. https://www.
hse.gov.uk/msd/backpain/index.htm. Accessed 21
May 2021.
3. Cohn JD, Korver KF. Optimizing Saphenous vein site selection using intraoperative venous duplex ultra­sound scanning. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79:2013–7.
4. Lin TY, Chiu MK, Wang MJ, Chu SH. Carbon dioxide embolism during endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting in coronary artery bypass surgery. J Thorac and Cardio Surg. 2013;126(6):2011–105.
5. Raja SG, Sarang Z. Endoscopic vein harvesting: technique, outcomes, concerns and controversies. J Thorac Dis. 2013;5 Suppl 6:630–7.
Further Reading
6. 888627_VS-PLUS-Brochure_USletter_MAR2018_ FINAL-LR.pdf (terumo-cvs.com)
Endoscopic Mitral Valve Surgery
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Using the External Clamp
Patrick Perier
Abstract
Fear change and it will destroy you, embrace change and it will enlarge you. Elizabeth Moon in the Speed of Dark
Minimally invasivemitral valve surgery has become along the years more and more accepted by the surgical community, and more and more demanded by the patients. In Germany, isolated mitral valve repair is per­formed minimally invasively in more than 50% of the cases. Many different approaches are existing: direct Vision, totally endoscopic operation, peripheral cannulation, central can­nulation, depending on the surgeons prefer­ences. One differentiation is the use of external clamp or endo aortic occlusion. We will concentrate in this article on the descrip­tion of our use of the external clamp. Empha­sis has to be placed on the advantages of the totally endoscopic approach: limited incision,
Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21104-1_8. The
videos can be accessed individually by clicking the DOI link in the accompanying gure caption or by scanning this link with the SN More Media App.
P. Perier (&) Herz und Gefäß Klinik, Salzburger Leite 1, 97616 Bad Neustadt/Saale, Germany e-mail: pperier@club-internet.fr
no rib spreading to ensure limited postopera­tive pain and a quick recovery. Moreover; everyone in the operating room can follow the operation, which strengthens the links between the members of the team, but also this allows to train in a very effective way.
Keywords
Heart valveMitral valve repairMitral valve
Valve diseaseSurgeryMinimally
invasive approach
Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery started in 1996 when Alain Carpentier performed the rst successful video assisted mitral valve repair [1]. Pioneers like Fred Mohr [2] and Hugo Vanermen [3] have further developed the tech­nique which progressively has become a routine approach for mitral valve surgery in many cen­ters. In Germany, more than half of the operation on isolated mitral valve regurgitation are per­formed minimally invasively. The presumed benets of this approach for both mitral valve repair and mitral valve replacement include improved cosmetic, but also a reduction in post­operative pain, blood loss, blood transfusi on, hospital stay, and time to return to normal activity; of course, there is no risk of sternal infection. Numerous studies have conrmed the safety of this approach, and the excellent mid­term outcomes [4]. It has been shown that mitral
External clamp
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 J. Zacharias (ed.), Endoscopic Cardiac Surgery,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21104-1_8
129
130 P. Perier
valve repair can be performed with the same efciency as a standard sternotomy, and with the same rate of repair [5].
Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery is a spectrum, with different varieties of incisions, means of cannulation and means of visualization. Schematically it can be divided in two groups. In the rst group, direct vision is used. It is the most popular, but it is associated with a longer incision and most often a rib-spreading retractor is nee­ded. This minimizes the full advantage of mini­mally invasive approach. In the second group, endoscopic guidance (whether traditional or robotic) with improved visualization allows to further reduce invasiveness and trauma, thus enhancing the advantages of minimally invasive surgery [6, 7]. The recent development of 3-D visualization has greatly improved the comfort, the precision and has led to a decrease in the operating and ischemic time.
To achieve good results and master this approach, a learning cu rve is necessary which may create a reluctancy to adopt this technique [810].
Two different methods of cross clamping the aorta is a vailable: the endo-aortic balloon occlusion or the external trans thoracic cross clamping which is the subject of this chapter. There is little evidence to choose one option or the other, and in end effect it is more a question of personal inclination [11].
1 Arguments for the External
Clamp
Surgeons performing minimally invasive mitral valve repai r usually adopt one way of clamping the aorta external or internal and stick to this method. Since the beginning of our experience, we have chosen to use the external clamp for its ease of use. Other elements are to be taken into consideration, among which the economic aspect plays is key. It is a fact that the price of the endo­aortic balloon system is signicant, whereas for the external clamp, apart from the clamp bought
once for all, the only expenses are a 4-0 suture and a cannula for the injection of the cardioplegia.
Another point that will become increasingly important is the environmental impact. The amount of waste in the operating room after using an endo clamp is considerably greater (Fig. 1) than after using an external clamp (Fig. 2) as shown in the attached pictures, and that is not considering the negative impact on the environment of the manufacture of this material. In comparison, the carbon footprint of the ex­ternal clamp is negligible.
The external clamp is always ready for use. In contrast over the years, due to technical failures, the production of the endo-balloon has been stopped several times, sometime for a long per­iod, obliging its users to switch to another method. The reliability of the device is questionable.
2 Preoperative Decision Making
Process
Once the indication for mitral surgery has been retained, it is necessary to decide if the patient can be operated minimally invasively, and this depends on the level of expertise.
In advanced centers where minimally invasive mitral valve surgery is routinely performed, all patients referred for mitral surgery are operated minimally invasively with or without concomi­tant tricuspid repair, atrial brillation ablation or ASD. The contraindications are patients with previous right thoracotomy, severe peripheral vascular disease, or particularly important bar of calcium of the posterior annulus, which may be a relative contraindication. A previous sternotomy is not a contraindication.
For surgeons with less experience, the selec­tion of patients is crucial, and a step-by-step strategy is mandatory to ensure a safe outcome with a good result. Easy patients should be tackled rst, isolated mitral valve dysfunction like annular dilatation, mitral valve replacement, easy prolapse of the posterior leaet. The
Endoscopic Mitral Valve Surgery Using the External Clamp 131
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Fig. 1 Waste in the OR after the use of an endo-clamp
difculty of the cases may be progressively increased, and then it is possible to add ablation, then tricuspid repair and then a combination of the three.
3 Preoperative Radiological
Examinations
A computed tomographic angiography from the neck to the thighs may be performed. It will assess:
The ascending aorta (dimensions and quality)The presence of signicant mitral
calcications
– The most appropriate intercostal space to
access the mitral valve.
The descending and abdominal aorta
The iliac and femoral vessels ruling out
aneurysm, severe arteriosclerotic disease, or
dissection.
In our center, we do not perform this exami­nation routinely, except for patients above 75 years of age, or patients with history of peripheral vascular disease.
4 Anesthesia and Positioning
of the Patient
A routine anesthesia is performed. The only particular point for minimally invasive surgery is the question of intubation: single lumen or dou­ble lumen tube. There are advantages to both approaches. With the single lumen tube, one has