Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3753_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
24 Мб
Скачать
Endoscopic Closed Tunnel Conduit Harvesting: Tips, Tricks and Traps 101
West retractor
Radial artery
Fig. 8 Illustrates the initial exposure of the radial artery in the wrist
Fig. 9 Illustrates the isolated radial artery before harvesting
Vesiloop
Radial artery
102 B. Krishnamoorthy and J. Blackmore
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Dissecng cone
Radial artery
Fig. 10 Illustrates the tunnel in the hand and the endoscopic dissection tip
Allens Test is again performed to ensure ade­quate hand perfusion by the ulnar artery. The bulldog clamp is then removed, and additional dissection of the RA pedicle and anterior fascia is performed as far proximal as possible to allow for safe entry of the endoscopic harvesting device. Exsanguinate the arm with an Esmark bandage and inate the tourniquet.
The endoscopic harvesting device is then introduced into the incision (Fig. 10) in between the RA pedicle and the anterior fascia. Dissection is performed initially by an anterior pass fol­lowing along the vena comitantes on either side. An additional posterior pass is then performed to identify any branches and connective tissue on the posterior aspect of the pedicle. During these dissection passes, it is important to glance away from the monitor down to the surgical eld on occasion to assess the progress up the arm. The length of the RA is shorter than what a harvester will be accustomed to with the SV, therefore the proximal limit of dissection may be reached sooner than anticipated. The RA harvest differs from that of the SV in that the entirety of the harvesting device will not be needed to reach the endpoint. As the proximal limit of dissection is approached, there will be an increase in adipose tissue (Fig. 11) on and around the radial pedicle. Take caution when approaching branches for
dissection as they are much more fragile than those of the SV (Fig. 12).
Cauterization:
Blunt tissue dissection is followed by the cau­terization step. Introduce the device into the trocar, but do not proceed all the way into the tunnel. This pause allows you to evaluate the tunnel directly in front of the trocar. At this point, you can advance the cautery sheers to ligate any branches that would impede progression of the device and to also begin the anterior fasciotomy (Fig. 13). Continue the anterior fasciotomy approximately 1/3 the distance up the forearm, following the tendon of the brachioradialis muscle. Conclude the fasciotomy as the tendon crosses to the opposite side of the tunnel. Cau­terize each branch as they are encountered to avoid avulsion injury. Branches of the RA are extremely small and fragile making them sus­ceptible to avulsion. When the proximal limit of dissection has been reached, retrace the length of the pedicle to ensure that all branches and con­nective tissue have been ligated.
The harvesting device is then inserted the length of the tunnel to the proximal limit of dissection. Palpate the distal end of the device while watching the monitor to determine the desired ligation point. Using an #11 scalpel,
Endoscopic Closed Tunnel Conduit Harvesting: Tips, Tricks and Traps 103
Branch
Fig. 11 Illustrates the clear hand tunnel and branches of the radial artery
Fig. 12 Illustrates the dissected radial artery within the tunnel in the hand
puncture the skin down to the distal tunnel, carefully observing the tip of the blade to avoid injury to the pedicle. Insert a tonsil hemostat through the incision site and open the tips to
stretch open the anterior fascia. When clamping the pedicle, consider the depth of the tunnel that it will need to be pulled through. This depth should coincide with an equal length on the
Dissected Radial artery
104 B. Krishnamoorthy and J. Blackmore
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Hemopro probe
Fascia
Radial artery
Fig. 13 Illustrates the anterior fasciotomy
proximal side of the clamp to avoid tension. With the pedicle clamped, remove the hemostat from the tunnel. Divide the pedicle under direct vision and ligate the proximal stump with a stick-tie using a 2–0 silk suture.
Conduit Preparation:
When the pedicle has been completely remo ved from the tunnel, deate the tourniquet, if using. At this point, the distal end remains intact and blood ow should be observed from the proxi­mal, ligated end. Place a soft bulldog on the ligated end and irrigate the pedicle with Papaverine (Fig. 14). Using a small clip applier, inspect the pedicle for branches and clip as they are encountered. A large clip can be applied to the connective tissue to denote the proximal end of the conduit to aid in maintaining orientation. Clamp the distal end of the radial pedicle with a right-angle hemostat and ligate with a scalpel. The distal RA stump is then tied off with a silk tie. Engage the proximal end of the RA and ush with vessel solution. The pedicle is then placed in a specimen cup with vessel solution and stored
in a warmer at 37 °C (98°F). The wrist inci sion is closed in usual fashion. The stab-and-grab inci­sion is closed with a single gure-of-eight sub­cutaneous stitch using a 3–0 Vicryl (Fig. 15). Cover each incision with appropriate bandages. The arm is wrapped with a Kerlex dressing fol­lowed by an ACE wrap. A continuous pulse oximeter is placed on the thumb to verify ade­quate perfusion. The wraps are removed on POD 1 to inspect for hematoma formation and baseline strength and sensation of the hand and arm.
Body Habitus Considerations:
The body habitus of the patient can provide additional variables that further complicate the procedure. Thin patients generally provide har­vesting advantages as the initial dissection to the RA is simplied, the tunnel is easily maintained, and the depth of which the RA pedicle needs to traverse for ligation is minimal. Obese and muscular patients, however, provide certain procedural difculties. A wrist with excess adi­pose tissue causes the initial dissection down to the RA to become challenging. If using a closed-
Endoscopic Closed Tunnel Conduit Harvesting: Tips, Tricks and Traps 105
Radial artery
Fig. 14 Illustrates the harvested radial artery with bulldog clip
Fig. 15 Illustrates the closed arm after radial artery harvesting
106 B. Krishnamoorthy and J. Blackmore
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Video 3 Endoscopic radial artery harvest (https://doi.org/10.1007/000-a7e)
CO2tunnel, an obese arm can cause the tunnel to collapse. In addition to collapsing the tunnel, the main disadvantage that a muscular arm produces is that of the depth which the radial pedicle must be retrieved for the stab-and-grab ligation (Video 3).
General Concepts:
A harvester should be experienced and procient with endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting before attempting an endoscopic radial artery harvest. The branches of the RA are prone to avulsion and the risk of vasospasm is high due to vessel manipulation. Harvesters should have completed 50–75 endoscopic SV harvests inde­pendently prior to pursuing ERAH. If possible, formal training in a cadaver lab should be obtained prior to attempting in the operating room. In our experience, the non-dominant hand should be the rst choice, but the domi­nant hand does not need to be avoided if that
RA proves to be the best conduit for harvest­ing. Internal evaluation of the patients grip strength 3 months after surgery has shown no loss of strength from the donor arm.
5 Conclusion
Evidence continues to suggest the RA provides superior patency rates compa red to the SV and comparable patency rates to the RITA. There is less risk associated with using the RA compared to the RITA. For these reasons, the RA should be the second choice for coronary revascularization conduit, following the LITA. ERAH has been proven to be a safe surgical technique with no effects on graft patency or mortality [30]. Com­pared to open harvesting, ERAH results in improved cosmesis, less pain, and fewer neuro­logic complications [31, 32].
Endoscopic Closed Tunnel Conduit Harvesting: Tips, Tricks and Traps 107
References
1. Collins JP. New standards and criteria for accredi­tation of hospitals and posts for surgical training. ANZ J Surg. 2008;78(4):277–81.
2. Krishnamoorthy B, Critchley WR, Bhinda P, Crock­ett J, John A, Bridgewater BJ, et al. Does the introduction of a comprehensive structured training programme for endoscopic vein harvesting improve conduit quality? A multicentre pilot study. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015;20(2):186–93.
3. Klassen RM, Klassen JRL. Self-efcacy beliefs of medical students: a critical review. Perspect Med Educ. 2018;7(2):76–82.
4. Goldman S, Zadina K, Moritz T, Ovitt T, Sethi G, Copeland JG, et al. Long-term patency of saphenous vein and left internal mammary artery grafts after coronary artery bypass surgery: results from a Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44(11):2149–56.
5. Mitchel P. Goldman RAW. Chapter 12: Clinical Methods for Sclerotherapy of Telangiectasias,: Else­vier; 2017.
6. Chen SS, Prasad SK. Long saphenous vein and its anatomical variations. Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2009;12(1):28–31.
7. Krishnamoorthy B, Critchley WR, Glover AT, Nair J, Jones MT, Waterworth PD, et al. A random­ized study comparing three groups of vein harvesting methods for coronary artery bypass grafting: endo­scopic harvest versus standard bridging and open techniques. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012;15(2):224–8.
8. Slim K, Bazin JE. From informed consent to shared decision-making in surgery. J Visc Surg. 2019;156 (3):181–4.
9. Krishnamoorthy B, Critchley WR, Thompson AJ, Payne K, Morris J, Venkateswaran RV, et al. Study Comparing Vein Integrity and Clinical Outcomes in Open Vein Harvesting and 2 Types of Endoscopic Vein Harvesting for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft­ing: The VICO Randomized Clinical Trial (Vein Integrity and Clinical Outcomes). Circulation. 2017;136(18):1688–702.
10. Illig KA, Rhodes JM, Sternbach Y, Green RM. Financial impact of endoscopic vein harvest for infrainguinal bypass. J Vasc Surg. 2003;37(2): 323–30.
11. Garcia-Altes A, Peiro S. A systematic review of cost­effectiveness evidence of endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting: is it efficient? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011;41(6):831–6.
12. Luckraz H, Cartwright C, Nagarajan K, Kaur P, Nevill A. Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event and patientsquality of life after endoscopic vein harvesting as compared with open vein harvest (MAQEH): a pilot study. Open Heart. 2018;5(1): e000694.
13. Brown EN, Kon ZN, Tran R, Burris NS, Gu J, Laird P, et al. Strategies to reduce intraluminal clot formation in endoscopically harvested saphenous veins. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;134 (5):1259–65.
14. Carpentier A, Guermonprez JL, Deloche A, Frechette C, DuBost C. The aorta-to-coronary radial artery bypass graft. A technique avoiding patholog­ical changes in grafts. Ann Thorac Surg. 1973;16 (2):111–21.
15. Verma S, Szmitko PE, Weisel RD, Bonneau D, Latter D, Errett L, et al. Should radial arteries be used routinely for coronary artery bypass grafting? Circu­lation. 2004;110(5):e40–6.
16. Acar C, Jebara VA, Portoghese M, Beyssen B, Pagny JY, Grare P, et al. Revival of the radial artery for coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 1992;54(4):652–9; discussion 9–60.
17. Collins P, Webb CM, Chong CF, Moat NE, Radial Artery Versus Saphenous Vein Patency Trial I. Radial artery versus saphenous vein patency ran­domized trial: ve-year angiographic follow-up. Circulation. 2008;117(22):2859–64.
18. Gaudino M, Benedetto U, Fremes S, Biondi-Zoccai G, Sedrakyan A, Puskas JD, et al. Radial-Artery or Saphenous-Vein Grafts in Coronary-Artery Bypass Surgery. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(22):2069–77.
19. Marchese RM, Geiger Z. Anatomy, Shoulder and Upper Limb, Forearm Radial Artery. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL); 2021.
20. Glover NM, Murphy PB. Anatomy, Shoulder and Upper Limb, Radial Nerve. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL); 2021.
21. Hillis LD, Smith PK, Anderson JL, Bittl JA, Bridges CR, Byrne JG, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Associa­tion Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;143(1):4–34.
22. Baudo M, Gaudino M. Radial artery and right internal thoracic artery: jousting for the throne of coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Transl Med. 2017;5(17):354.
23. Gaudino M, Lorusso R, Rahouma M, Abouarab A, Tam DY, Spadaccio C, et al. Radial artery versus right internal thoracic artery versus saphenous vein as the second conduit for coronary artery bypass surgery: a network meta-analysis of clinical out­comes. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8(2): e010839.
24. Tranbaugh RF, Schwann TA, Swistel DG, Dim­itrova KR, Al-Shaar L, Hoffman DM, et al. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery using the radial artery, right internal thoracic artery, or saphenous vein as the second conduit. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;104(2):553–
9.
25. Navia JL, Olivares G, Ehasz P, Gillinov AM, Svensson LG, Brozzi N, et al. Endoscopic radial artery harvesting procedure for coronary artery
108 B. Krishnamoorthy and J. Blackmore
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
bypass grafting. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;2 (4):557–64.
26. Nguyen JD, Duong H. Anatomy, Shoulder and
Upper Limb, Hand Arteries. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL); 2021.
27. Gellman H, Botte MJ, Shankwiler J, Gelberman RH. Arterial patterns of the deep and supercial palmar arches. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;383:41–6.
28. Kumar K, Railton C, Tawc Q. Tourniquet applica­tion during anesthesia: What we need to know?J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2016;32(4):424–30.
29. Gaudino M, Benedetto U, Fremes SE, Hare DL, Hayward P, Moat N, et al. Effect of Calcium-Channel Blocker Therapy on Radial Artery Grafts After Coronary Bypass Surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73(18):2299–306.
30. Rahouma M, Kamel M, Benedetto U, Ohmes LB, Di Franco A, Lau C, et al. Endoscopic versus open radial artery harvesting: A meta-analysis of random­ized controlled and propensity matched studies. J Card Surg. 2017;32(6):334–41.
31. Bisleri G, Giroletti L, Hrapkowicz T, Bertuletti M, Zembala M, Arieti M, et al. Five-Year Clinical Outcome of Endoscopic Versus Open Radial Artery Harvesting: A Propensity Score Analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;102(4):1253–9.
32. Patel AN, Henry AC, Hunnicutt C, Cockerham CA, Willey B, Urschel HC, Jr. Endoscopic radial artery harvesting is better than the open technique. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;78(1):149–53; discussion-53.
Endoscopic Vein Harvest Using
®
an Open System (Terumo
Donna Croft, Steven Power, and Louise Parry
)
Abstract
The advent of endoscopic vein harvesting (EVH) has allowed operators to harvest the long saphenous vein (LSV) through small incisions. This has translated into a reduction in leg wound infections, pain, hospital length of stay and recent studies demonstrate it to be equal to open vein harvesting (OVH) with regards to long term vein graft patency. Within our institution, EVH is routinely performed by a Surgical Care Practitioner (SCP) for most patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafts (CABG). The EVH system routinely used at our institution is the Terumo sel Harvesting System. The learning curve for EVH is steep and although we have encoun­tered many traps along the way, we have
Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21104-1_7. The
videos can be accessed individually by clicking the DOI link in the accompanying gure caption or by scanning this link with the SN More Media App.
D. Croft (&) S. Power L. Parry Lancashire Cardiac Centre, Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Blackpool, UK e-mail: donna.croft2@nhs.net
®
Virtuosaph®Plus Endoscopic Ves-
developed some tips and tricks that we would like to share with you within this chapter. Drawing on our experiences at Blackpool this chapter will walk the operator through the steps required to ensure successful EVH for patients undergoing CABG. It will begin with the preoperative assessment of patients for EVH, followed by the procedure. This is broken down into two parts; the dissection and the harvest, followed by postoperative complications.
Keywords
Endoscopic vein harvestingEVHTerumo Long saphenous veinCoronary artery bypass surgery
CABG
1 Introduction
Use of an Endoscopic Vein Harvest (EVH) technique, when harvesting the Long Saphenous Vein (LSV) for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery (CABG), has been shown to reduce leg wound complications when compared to open vein harvesting, with no signicant difference in the rate of major adverse cardiac events [1].
The EVH programme was initiated at Black-
pool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 J. Zacharias (ed.), Endoscopic Cardiac Surgery,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21104-1_7
109
110 D. Croft et al.
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
in 2007 and has become the standard practice for all patients undergoing CABG. Currently, approximately 75% of patients undergoing CABG surgery at the trust receive EVH using the TerumoEVH system.
2 Pre-operative Considerations
2.1 Equipment Preparation
Prior to undertaking your rst EVH procedure, it is important to ensure you have all the equipment available, that it is working and that all the equipment is compatible with each other.
The following equipment is essential (Fig. 1):
Non-disposable
Video stack system and camera.
CO
insufation system.
2
A compatible light lead.
A compatible generator (See Table 1).
TerumoEndoscope (MCENDO550).
Disposable
Virtuosaph
®
Plus Endoscopic Vein Harvest-
ing System.
Camera cover.
CO
insufation tubing.
2
2.2 Orientation to the Terumo
System (See Video 1)
See Fig. 2
Fig. 1 EVH equipment