Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5528_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
26 Мб
Скачать
280 J. Mirkovic & E. Yang
95. Nadiarnykh, O., LaComb, R. B., Brewer, M. A., and Campagnola, P. J. Alterations of the extracellular matrix in ovarian cancer studied by second harmonic generation imaging microscopy. BMC Cancer, 10: 94 (2010).
96. Yang, Y., Wang, T., Brewer, M., and Zhu, Q. Quantitative analysis of angle-resolved scattering properties of ovarian tissue using optical coherence tomography. Journal of Biomedical Optics, 17(9): 90503–90501 (2012).
97. Yang,Y., et al. Optical scattering coefficient estimated by optical coherence tomogra­phy correlates with collagen content in ovarian tissue. Journal of Biomedical Optics, 16(9): 090504 (2011).
98. Srivastava, S., Rodríguez, J. J., Rouse, A. R., Brewer, M. A., and Gmitro, A. F. Computer-aided identification of ovariancancer in confocal microendoscope images. Journal of Biomedical Optics, 13(2): 024021 (2008).
99. Kindelberger, D. W., et al. Intraepithelial carcinoma of the fimbria and pelvic serous carcinoma: Evidence for a causal relationship. American Journal of Surgical Pathol- ogy, 31(2): 161–169 (2007).
100. Crum, C. P., et al. The distal fallopian tube: A new model for pelvic serous carcino­genesis. Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology 19(1): 3–9 (2007).
101. Lee, Y., et al. Advances in the recognition of tubal intraepithelial carcinoma: Appli­cations to cancer screening and the pathogenesis of ovarian cancer. Advances In Anatomic Pathology, 13(1): 1–7 (2006).
102. Medeiros, F., et al. The tubal fimbria is a preferred site for early adenocarcinoma in women with familial ovarian cancer syndrome. American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 30(2): 230–236 (2006).
103. Meserve, E. E. K., Brouwer, J., and Crum, C. P. Serous tubal intraepithelial neoplasia: The concept and its application. Modern Pathology, 30(5): 710–721 (2017).
104. Rodriguez, E. F., Lum, D., Guido, R., and Austin, R. M. Cytologic findings in exper­imental in vivo fallopian tube brush specimens. Acta Cytologica, 57(6): 611–618 (2013).
105. Lum, D., et al. Brush cytology of the fallopian tube and implications in ovarian cancer screening. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 21(5): 851–856 (2014).
106. Chene, G., et al. Dynamic real-time in vivo confocal laser endomicroscopy of the fallopian tube during laparoscopy in the prevention of ovarian cancer. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 216: 18–23 (2017).
107. Kirillin, M., Panteleeva, O., Yunusova, E., Donchenko, E., and Shakhova, N. Cri­teria for pathology recognition in optical coherence tomography of fallopian tubes. Journal of Biomedical Optics, 17(8): 081413–081411 (2012).
108. Wu, T.-Y., Rouse, A. R., Chambers, S. K., Hatch, K. D., and Gmitro, A. F. Confo­cal microlaparoscope for imaging the fallopian tube. Journal of Biomedical Optics 19(11): 116010 (2014).
109. Pierangelo, A., Fuks, D., Benali, A., Validire, P.,and Gayet, B. Diagnostic accuracy of confocal laser endomicroscopy for the ex vivo characterization of peritoneal nodules during laparoscopic surgery. Surgical Endoscopy, 31(4): 1974–1981 (2017).
,
© 2024 World Scientific Publishing Company
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813206984_0014

Hepatobiliary System Chapter

14
Erin Rubin∗, James Park Dewar∗, Daniel Schmolze

Introduction

, and Wei Zheng
Second to the skin, the liver is the largest and heaviest organ in the human body. There are many functions of the human liver. These are not limited to, but include, the metabolism of food, alcohol, andmedications, the storageof nutrients, and cleaning waste. Approximately 80% of the blood delivered to the liveris through the portal vein, filled with blood high in nutrients;20% is provided via the hepatic artery,rich in oxygenated blood. The liver produces bile, albumin,and most of the clotting factors.There are many cell types that comprise this organ, with the majority being the parenchymal epithelial cell hepatocytes. There are biliary epithelial cells and non-parenchymal cells
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Texas Health Science
Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Department of Pathology, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA.
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta,
GA, USA.
281
282 E. Rubin
et al.
including hepatic stellate cells or Ito cells. The liver sinusoids are lined with sinusoidal endothelial cells and phagocytic Kupffer cells. Each of these cell types has the potential to become neoplastic. The most common benign tumor of the liver is a cavernous hemangioma and the most common primary malignant tumor of the liver is hepatocellular carcinoma. Many of the diseases of the liver are caused by alcohol use, metabolic syndrome, and hepatitis viral infections: most commonly hepatitis B virus or hepatitis C virus. Liver disease is a major cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. Accurate diagnosis is essential for proper treatment.
The liver is found in the right upper abdomen, below the diaphragm and under the ribs. Imaging of solid organs remains a challenge due to accessibility. Recent advances in biological imaging devices provide oppor­tunities in the field of transplantation for pre-transplant donor evaluation of organ viability and intraoperative ly during laparoscopic or open surgery. Whole-body, non-invasive, radiologic imaging techniques have rapidly advanced to include Positron emission tomography (PET), MRI, and CT. The resolution, however, of these modalities is limited. Histopathologic analysis is still a mainstay in the diagnostic workup of liverdiseases, includ­ing neoplastic and non-neoplastic diseases. The gold standard of micro­scopic imaging remains the formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE), 4 µm tissue section stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). For the liver, the ideal specimens are obtained using 15- or 18-gauge core needle biopsies. There are several drawbacks to performing a core needle biopsy of the liver. The FFPE technique is invasive and there is a time delay. The image is static and represents only one time point. Only after 4–12 hours can early coagulative necrosis be seen by H&E analysis.
The most rapid, microscopic, diagnostic technique used in clinical settings is the cryosection (or frozen section). This technique is used for intraoperative assessment of margin status during tumor resections, pre­transplant donor evaluation, and other time-sensitive evaluations. Cryosec­tions aremore diagnostically challenging,with more falsenegative and false positiveresults than FFPE sections. In vivo imaging modalities are superior to both FFPE and cryosections in that they are real-time non-invasive and result in little tissue injury. More than cryosection, in vivo imaging has the potential to provide insight into functionality, viability, necrosis, and ade­quacy of flow. There is less risk of sampling error as it is easier to image a
Hepatobiliary System 283
larger surface area rather than the limitations of a single sample. There are no freezing or cutting artifacts or tissue loss, as seen in the intraoperative construction of the H&E stained cryosection.
Non-invasive, high-resolution imaging of the liver is an attractive prospect for several reasons. A core needle biopsy carries an increased risk of bleeding, particularly in patients with coagulation abnormalities. Most of the clotting factors are made by the liver. Fear of bleeding may prompt smaller biopsies, which may be non-diagnostic or inaccurate.
1, 2
Second,
random percutaneous liver biopsy can lead to sampling error, even for dis-
3,4
eases which involve the entire liver, such as hepatitis.
Mini-laparoscopy
can help target biopsies and has been shown to improve diagnostic accu-
5, 6
racy,
but an invasive biopsy is still ultimately required.
Recent advances in optical imaging technologies have become a sig­nificant source of innovation in histopathologic diagnosis. This exciting new technology provides pathologists and clinicians with a potentially new way to visualize and generate diagnoses in patients, real time, both in vivo and ex vivo. A growingarray of optical imaging techniques have been inves­tigated as alternatives or as adjunct approaches to diagnosis. This powerful technique will potentially allow for the clinical assessment of hepatic dis­eases at the microscopic level, both real time and in vivo.Atthistime, the techniques include optical coherence tomography, conventional confo­cal microscopy, and confocal endomicroscopy. These promising imaging modalities go beyond hematoxylin and e osin (H&E) histopathologic eval­uation by offering an instant, minimally inva sive, or non-invasive diagnosis in tissues (the so-called optical biopsy). These can also provide dynamic monitoring and screening of pathologic tissue to guide targeted tissue sam­pling and to improve diagnostic accuracy.
As in most solid organs, in vivo microscopy (IVM) of the liver is at a relatively early stage of development. Unlike the skin, gastrointesti­nal and genitourinary tract, most solid organs are not readily accessible. Other barriers to IVM include limited depth of penetration, photobleach­ing, phototoxicity, image quality, the large size of imaging devices, and how to maintain sterility. The limitation of the depth of penetration has con­strained in vivo imaging to a few hundred microns below the liver surface. In non-neoplastic diseases with global liver involvement, such as hepatitis, this limitation is less important. In vivo imaging has been successfully
284 E. Rubin
et al.
applied in such diseases, with promising early results. These studies have used confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) by adapting the devices now widely availablefor use in the tubular gastrointestinaltract. Neoplastic liver applications have so far been limited to either animal models or ex vivo experiments. As in vivo imaging devices continue to become smaller and more flexible, this field will advance faster. New avenues for imaging small branches of the biliary tree or hepatic vasculature and hepatic neoplasms will become feasible. This chapter will focus on the major advances of in vivo and ex vivo studies in humans and animals, as well as preclinical evidence of diagnostic capacity and potential clinical applications of these imaging technologies. This chapter will assess the strengths and limitations of each approach, specific to hepatobiliary pathology, with an eye toward possible future developments.

Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)

As fully discussed in other chapters, OCT is an interference-based optical imaging modality, which fills a resolution gap between ultrasound imag­ing and confocal endoscopic imaging. The image resolution of standard OCT is similar to a 4x objective (N.A. 0.1) of a light microscope (approx­imately 2–10 µm). Although this resolution is not sufficient for routine histopathologic diagnoses, OCT is advantageous in that it provides a good penetration depth of up to 2–3 mm. OCT allows assessment of different layers of tissue components with a relatively high resolution (10 to 100 times finer than standard clinical ultrasound). OCT has been applied to image human as well as animal liver tissue ex vivo. OCT has been used to image biopsy specimens and has been found to be able to distinguish normal, early cancer, and cancerous liver tissues. The histological architecture and bland cytology of normal liver can be read­ily visualized by en face tomographic imaging, including central veins, hepatocyte cords, sinusoidal spaces, and the portal triad (portal vein, hep­atic artery, and bile duct). OCT imaging of a wide variety of histological subtypes of hepatocellular carcinoma was able to identify malignant cyto­logical features, particularly nuclear atypia (enlarged convoluted nuclei) and thickened fibrous bands.
8
Ex vivo OCT imaging of human normal liver
7
In the research setting,
Hepatobiliary System 285
tissue revealed intrahepatic bile duct, including biliary epithelium, subep­ithelial lamina propria, and fibroadipose connective tissue.The surrounding hepatic parenchyma had a homogeneous contrast and was seen underlying the connective tissue.
9
In contrast, visualizing intrahepatic cholangiocar­cinoma using OCT exhibited a unique feature of the portal vein showing a blurred pattern in the lateral direction and an aggregated distribution in the axial direction.
8
A recent human pilot study extended OCT’s applica­tiontothein vivo level. The study performed endoscopic OCT imaging of the intrahepatic biliary tree and showed the feasibility of OCT in dis­tinguishing non-neoplastic from neoplastic lesions in vivo. Biliary ductal epithelium and subepithelial structures, including peribiliary glands, vas­culature, and hepatic parenchyma were observed. In two c ases of papillary cholangiocarcinoma, OCT was able to identify the characteristic papil­lary epithelial architecture and quantify epithelial thickness without OCT­related complications.This preliminary study is highly meaningful because the diagnosis of bile duct lesions obtained by traditional ERCP biopsy is often non-diagnostic. The sensitivityof intraductal brush cytology is highly variable. In addition, endoscopic OCT can provide broad-field, subsurface, and near-microscopic imaging of hepatobiliary tract in real time during the endoscopy procedure. These results suggest that OCT has the capacity and potential to reduce sampling errors and improve diagnostic sensitivity by identifying suspicious lesions and guiding targeted biopsies and surgical interventions. As the usage expands and more validation studies are con­ducted with OCT in evaluating hepatobiliary lesions, we expect that OCT will play a more significant impact on the clinical diagnosis and manage­ment of liver diseases.

Conventional Confocal Microscopy and Confocal Endomicroscopy

Reflectance confocal microscopy utilizes a near-infrared laser beam to illuminate tissue and detects the natural differences of tissue refractivity, without the application of exogenous contrast agents. Any structure with high refractivity is displayed as white on a computer monitor, whereas any substance with no refractivity is visualized as black. Reflectance confocal
286 E. Rubin
et al.
microscopy has been utilized to assess liver parenchyma both in vivo and ex vivo. In vivo reflectance confocal images from a series of normal rat
livers readily revealed essential architectural elements such as hepatic cell plates, sinusoids, venules, and portal vein spaces. Canaliculi could also be identified. However, defining the limits of the basic parenchymal unit was not successful because reflectance confocal does not allow recognition of differences in refractivity between hepatocytes of different acinar zones. Due to low resolution, the evaluation of hepatocyte intracellular detail was unsatisfactory.
10
Both fibrosis and steatosis were able to be evaluated using ex vivo reflectance confocal microscopy in both diseased and non-diseased states froma series of 12 human liver biopsy samples.Steatosis wasdepicted as well-demarcated, non-refractive globules of various sizes, ranging in diameter from 7.2 to 29 µm. Portal tract fibrosis was observed as the coarse bundles or networks of highly refractive materials in the portal space.
11
Common types of primary and secondary hepatic tumors were also satis­factorily evaluated with reflectance confocal microscopy, showing loss of hepatic architecture and newly formed structures, such as large vascular spaces, reactive fibroblasts, calcification, and inflammatory infiltrates.
Fluorescence confocal microscopy uses laser illumination to excite exogenously-induced fluorescent probes and collects excited signals from the tissue, allowing specific structure labeling and imaging. It is most com­monly implemented form of confocal microscopy. Obstacles of in vivo imaging include photobleaching and phototoxicity, which is inherent to any technique that uses fluorescence. The imaging techniques, although higher in resolution than radiologic imaging, are not able to view deeply into the tissue. So, for example, if the liver capsule is fibrotic, assessment of the tissue deep to the capsule is impaired. Imaging of a cross-section, wedge, or needle biopsy is possible, however.
Conventional fluorescent confocal microscopes are bulky instruments normally used in research laboratory settings. This imaging technique has been used to study almost all types of hepatobiliary diseases in human and in animal cell lines for decades by introducing various fluorescent labeling molecules. However,it was only a recent developmentto apply conventional confocal microscopy for in vivo imaging of the hepatobiliary system. By using fluorescent probes to label multiple cells and molecules simultane­ously in vivo on animal models, this new methodology allows researchers
Hepatobiliary System 287
to observe different hepatic parenchymal cells in their native environment. Hepatocytes, endothelial cells, and leukocytes were able to be visualized at the cellular or even subcellular level. With this technique, researchers are able to track temporospatial changes in morphology, metabolism, and function of hepatobiliary cells under various physiological or pathological conditions.
12
Recent advances in instrument miniaturization have led to the devel­opment of fluorescein-aided, miniprobe-based confocal laser endomicro­scope (CLE). This flexible, optical fiber can be placed through the working channel of standard endoscopes or laparoscopes. Moreover,in recent years, confocal laser-based imaging devices have been developed that are small enough to fit within a biopsy needle, enabling so-called needle-based con­focal laser endomicroscopy (nCLE). This exciting advancement for in vivo microscopy of solid organs has great potential applications, such as more accurate targeting of biopsies. Despite a fixed imaging depth and relatively low resolution of CLE, faster image acquisition and real-time in vivo his­tology examination during ongoing endoscopy or surgery have prompted the exploration of the application of this technique in hepatobiliary imag­ing and diagnosis. Animal studies do not have the limitations and safety issues of human trials, so many fluorescent contrast agents were first inves­tigated on animals and were later rapidly transferred into human applica-
13
tions.
For example, one initial animal trial in normal mouse liver revealed that CLE, with intravenous application of fluorescent contrast acriflavine, clearly identifiedthe lobular patternof the hepatic cells and surfaceendothe­lial cells. Subnuclear details of liver cells were also visible. The study also demonstrated that CLE images were comparable with corresponding
14
10µm-thick hematoxylin–eosin-stained tissue images.
Another early in vivo animal study used CLE to image dense mononuclear inflammatory infiltration in IL-12-induced hepatitis model and to visualize bile ductular proliferation and bile canaliculi dilation in a common bile duct ligation
15
model.
The CLE histologic images correlated well with conventional histology. A subsequent animal trial investigated the role of CLE in the evaluation of cirrhosis. After intravenous injection of fluorescein and using a probe of 50 or 100 µm working distances, CLE was able to visualizecords of hepatocytes radiating toward central venules in normal livers and dis­torted hepatic architecture was observed in cirrhotic rats. Moreover, CLE
288 E. Rubin
(a) (b) (c)
et al.
(a)
(a)
Figure 1. In vivo nCLE imaging of normal and cirrhotic rat livers. (Top row) Regular cords of hepatocytes are seen radiating toward a central venule in healthy livers. (a) = 0 µm probe, (b) = 50µm probe, (c) = 100µm probe. (Middle row) Images from cirrhotic livers, acquired from within the hepatic parenchyma, show irregular clumps of cells separated by bright bands. (Bottom row) a distinctive reticular pattern, seen in cirrhotic livers but only at the surface with the 0µm probe. Adapted from Ref. [16].
(b) (c)
with a probe of 0 µm working distance identified a unique reticular pattern on the liver surface that was only found in cirrhosis (Figure 1). This sug­gested that CLE could provide sufficient detail to distinguish normal from cirrhotic livers.
16
Another animal study using dual wavelength CLE in vivo imaged flu­orescein at 488 nm and indocyanine green at 660 nm in a porcine model of laparoscopic microwave liver ablation. The study showed that dual wavelength CLE permitted the distinction of in vivo of thermally ablated
Hepatobiliary System 289
liverfrom healthy liverduring laparoscopic surgerybased on loss of fluores­cence intensity. CLE imaging of fluorescein provided good visualization of the hepatic microvasculature; whereas, CLE imaging of indocyanine green clearly displayed the hepatic sinusoid architecture and interlobular septations.
17
A limited number of experiments have investigated the potential of in vivo microscopy to obtain temporal information, whether in the liver or in any other organ system. These capabilities of IVM tend not to translate neatly into pre-existing diagnostic frameworks but offer perhaps the most potential for novel insights into disease processes.
One such study has been performed in the liver, using a mouse model to examine both the spatial and temporal patterns of hepatocyte apoptosis.
21
Three different fluorophores were used: acriflavine (to provide hepatocyte contrast), FITC-labeleddextran (predominantly used to investigatechanges in vascular permeability), and fluorescently labeled poly-caspase inhibitor (FLIVO). Following Jo2-induced apoptosis, images were consecutively acquired from the same region of the liver surface at 5–10 minute intervals for up to 4 hours. Detailed sequential morphologic changes of apoptosis were observed, including the initial formation of cell membrane vesicles, cell swelling, and eventual nuclear blebbing and pyknosis (Figure 2).

Representative Human Confocal Laser Endomicroscopic Studies

The first report of the application of CLE for in vivo imaging of human liver was in 25 patients with suspected liver disease. intravenously administrated as a contrast agent during laparoscopy. Basic features of liver microarchitecture could be clearly visualized. In fatty liver disease, liver steatosis was reliably identified and graded by a black appear­ance due to lack of fluorescent signal. Macrovesicular or microvesicular fat inclusions could be distinguished from single-cell necrosis.
In vivo evaluation of fibrosis and cirrhosis was achieved by the iden­tification of connective tissue strands, of capsular and pericellular fibrosis, and of a micronodular liver surface by virtue of fluorescent labeling of elastic and collagenous structures (Figure 3).
18
Fluorescein was