Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_4538_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
26 Мб
Скачать
3 Sleep Related Breathing Disorders
https://t.me/medicina_free
63
The correction of nose disorders, should be performed to improve OSA tolerance to CPAP.
Some authors refer that daytime nasal obstruction is an independent risk factor for OSA [44].
Because increasing nasal resistance, results in increased of negative oropharyn­geal pressure during inspiration, leading to upper airway collapse.
The craniofacial morphology, the neck diameter and length, the tongue, the phar­ynx, and the larynx must be observed.
Features such as retrognathia, tonsillar hypertrophy, enlarged tongue or soft pal­ate, inferiorly positioned hyoid bone, maxillary and mandibular retroposition and decreased posterior airway space can narrow upper airway dimensions, narrow upper airway dimensions and promote the occurrence of apneas and hypopneas dur­ing sleep.
The most common craniofacial abnormalities associated with OSA are retrogna­thia and a high palate arch.
Retrognathia pushes the base of the tongue backward, producing a diminished retroglossal space. In many patients ,that are mouth breathers, since childood,the palate wil be high.
There is a need to check the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), where a typical click or jam can be felt on movement which might result from bruxism. I might worsens the airway collapse.
During mouth examination, many patients present macroglossia or retroposition of the tongue. This may inuence sleep even more in the supine position.
Malocclusion, mainly in Angle 2, leads to retroposition of the tongue.
A exible berscope is used to evaluate the nose, the nasopharynx, pharynx walls, epiglottis, and larynx.
The obstruction is more severe, if there is a voluminous tongue.
Mallampati score or Friedman tongue position the score is done to classify the relation of the tongue and is scored from 1 to 4.
The palatine tonsils’ size is also important, and we can score from 0 to 4, a major factor for obstruction [16].
The enlarged or elongated uvula and palate contribute to snoring and OSA by vibration or reduction of the retro-palatine space. Enlarged tonsils can accompany these features.
The golden standard for pharyngeal evaluation is nose–pharynx–larynx endoscopy.
Examination can be performed to see the anatomy, the obstruction zone and the patient breathing pattern.
The examination should be completed in some situations with drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE). Although it may increase cost and time, it allows an accu­rate airway examination.
OSA patients also may have dental problems, like dental caries, and teeth grind­ing from bruxism. This can be observed in sleep by the partner.
During the clinical examination, we must pay attention to the cranial anatomy, the neck diameter, nose, palate, teeth, tongue, pharynx, and larynx.
64
https://t.me/medicina_free
F. Fernandes
All ndings should be recorded in the clinical history or examination protocol, for clinical evaluation and for treatment of the patient.
Finally, the clinical history and examination must be complemented with other exams to get the precision diagnosis, for a correct treatment [20, 45].
Take-Home Message
• OSA is characterized by repetitive episodes of complete (apnea) or partial
(hypopnea) upper airway obstruction during sleep and can occur in any age
group. It often results in a reduction of blood oxygen saturation and is generally
terminated by brief arousals from sleep. These events last a minimum of 10
seconds.
• Central Sleep apnea is characterized by a crescendo-decrescendo ventilation pat-
tern- associated with central apnea–hypopnea. Heart failure is the primary cause
of CSA-CSB.
• Sleep-related hypoventilation disorder is characterized by insufcient sleep-
related ventilation, resulting in abnormally high arterial partial pressure of car-
bon dioxide (PaCO2) during sleep. There are diverse types.
• Sleep-related hypoxemia is related to signicant hypoxemia during sleep and is
secondary to a medical or neurological disorder.
• Risk factors for OSA include being male, excessive body weight, age, race,
familial and genetic predisposition, alcohol, smoking, and hormonal changes.
References
1. American Academy of Sleep Medicine. International classication of sleep disorders. 3rd ed. Darien: American Academy of Sleep Medicine; 2014.
2. Berry RB, Quan Stuart S, Abreu Alexandre R, Brooks R, Bibbs Marietta L, del Lourdes R, Harding SM, Lloyd RM, Min MM, Plante David T, Marcus CL, Troesler Matthew M, Vaughn BV, for the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. The AASM manual for the scoring of sleep and associated events: rules, terminology and technical specications, version 2.6. Darien: American Academy of Sleep Medicine; 2020. www.aasmnet.org
3. Charcionite K, Garounskaité R, Slekyte G, Danila D, Zablockis R.Evaluation of obstructive sleep apnea phenotypes treatment effectiveness. Medicina (Kaunas). 2021;574(4):335.
4. Pepin JL, Guillot M, Tamisier R, Levy P.The upper airway resistance syndrome. Respiration. 2012;83:559–66.
5. Punjabi NM. The epidemiology of adult obstructive sleep apnea. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2008;5:136–43.
6. Budhiraja R, Budhiraja P, Quan SF.Sleep-disordered breathing and cardiovascular disorders. Respir Care. 2010;55:1322–32.
7. Pamidi S, Aronsohn RS, Tasali E.Obstructive sleep apnea: role in the risk and severity of diabetes. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;24:703–15.
8. Marcus CL, Brooks LJ, Davidson Ward S, et al. Diagnosis and management of childhood obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: technical report. Pediatrics. 2012;130:e714–55.
9. Peer A, Lorber A, Suraiya S, Malhotra A, Pillar G.The occurrence of Cheyne–Stokes respira­tion in congestive heart failure: the effect of age. Front Psychiatry. 2010;1:133.
10. Guilleminault C, Cao M, Yue HJ, Chawla P.Obstructive sleep apnea and chronic opioid use. Lung. 2010;188:459–68.
3 Sleep Related Breathing Disorders
https://t.me/medicina_free
11. Burgess KR, Lucas SJ, Shepherd KL, etal. Worsening of central sleep apnea at high altitude— a role for cerebrovascular function. J Appl Physiol. 2013;114:1021–8.
12. Westhoff M, Arzt M, Litterst P. Prevalence and treatment of central sleep apnea emerging after initiation of continuous positive airway pressure in patients with obstructive sleep apnea without evidence of heart failure. Sleep Breath. 2012;16:71–8.
13. Chebbo A, Tfaili A, Jones SF. Hypoventilation syndromes. Med Clin N Am. 2011;95:1189–202.
14. Piper AJ, Grunstein RR.Obesity hypoventilation syndrome: mechanisms and management. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;183:292–8.
15. Ize-Ludlow D, Gray JA, Sperling MA, etal. Rapid-onset obesity with hypothalamic dys­function, hypoventilation, and autonomic dysregulation presenting in childhood. Pediatrics. 2007;120:e179–88.
16. Ambrosino N, Carpenè N, Gherardi M.Chronic respiratory care for neuromuscular diseases in adults. Eur Respir J. 2009;34:444–51.
17. Kezirian EJ, Chang JL.Snoring without OSA and health consequences: the jury is still out. Sleep. 2013;36:613.
18. Lee SA, Amis TC, Byth K, etal. Heavy snoring as a cause of carotid artery atherosclerosis. Sleep. 2008;31:1207–13.
19. Rich J, Raviv A, Raviv N, Brietzke SE.An epidemiologic study of snoring and all-cause mor­tality. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011;145:341–6.
20. Ustun B, Westover MB, Rudin C, Bianchi MT.Clinical prediction models for sleep apnea: the importance of medical history over symptoms. J Clin Sleep Med. 2016;12(2):161–8.
21. Rundo JV.Obstructive sleep apnea basics. Clev Clin J Med. 2019;86(9 Suppl 1):2–9.
22. Papadavid E, Dalamaga M, Vlami K, Koumaki D, Gyftopoulos S, Christodoulatos GS, Papiris S, Rigopoulos D.Psoriasis is associated with risk of obstructive sleep apnea independently from metabolic parameters and other comorbidities: a large hospital-based case-control study. Sleep Breath. 2017;21(4):949–58.
23. Young T.Menopausal status and sleep-disordered breathing in the Wisconsin Sleep Cohort Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003;167:1181–5.
24. Friedman M, Bliznikas D, Klein M, etal. Comparison of the incidences of obstructive sleep apnea–hypopnea syndrome in African Americans versus Caucasian–Americans. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006;134:545–50.
25. Patel SR, Larkin EK, Redline S.Shared genetic basis for obstructive sleep apnea and adiposity measures. Int J Obes. 2008;32:795–800.
26. Kirkham EM, Hatsukami TS, Heckbert SR, Sun J, Canton G, Yuan C, Weaver EM.Association between snoring and high-risk carotid plaque features. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;157(2):336–44.
27. Sjoholm TT, Lowe AA, Miyamoto K, etal. Sleep bruxism in patients with sleep-disordered breathing. Arch Oral Biol. 2000;45:889–96.
28. Kostrzewa-Janicka J, Jurkoswki P, Życińska K, Przybyłowska D, Mierzwińska-Natalska E.Bruxism. Neurosci Res. 2015;16:9–14.
29. Viera AJ, Bond MM, Yates SW. Diagnosing night sweats. Am Fam Physician. 2003;67:1019–24.
30. Wise SK, Wise JC, Del Gaudio JM.Gastroesophageal reux and laryngopharyngeal reux in patients with sleep-disordered breathing. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006;135:253–7.
31. Hajduk IA, Strollo PJJ, Jasani RR, etal. Prevalence and predictors of nocturia in obstructive sleep apnea–hypopnea syndrome—a retrospective study. Sleep. 2003;26:61–4.
32. Chugh DK, Dinges DF.Mechanisms of sleepiness in obstructive sleep apnea. In: Sleep apnea: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment, lung biology in health and disease. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2002. p.265–85.
33. Young T, Blustein JF, et al. Sleep-disordered breathing and motor vehicle accidents in a populations- based sample of employed adults. Sleep. 1997;20:608–13.
34. Johns MW. A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: the Epworth sleepiness scale. Sleep. 1991;14:540–5.
65
66
https://t.me/medicina_free
35. Engleman HM, Hirst WS, Douglas NJ.Under reporting of sleepiness and driving impairment in patients with sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome. J Sleep Res. 1997;6:272–5.
36. Fanfulla F, Pinna GD, Marrone O, D’Artavilla Lupo N, Arcovio S, Bonsignore MR, Morrone E.Determinants of sleepiness at wheel and missing accidents in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Front Neurosci. 2021;15:656303.
37. Appleton SL, Gill TK, Lang CJ, Taylor AW, McEvoy RD, Stocks NP, González-Chica DA, Adams RJ.Prevalence and comorbidity of sleep conditions in Australian adults: 2016 Sleep Health Foundation national survey. Sleep Health. 2017;4(1):13–9.
38. Provini F, Vetrugno R, Lugaresi E, et al. Sleep-related breathing disorders and headache. Neurol Sci. 2006;27(Suppl 2):S149–S52.
39. Ferini-Strambi L, Baietto C, Di Gioia MR, et al. Cognitive dysfunction in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA): partial reversibility after continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Brain Res Bull. 2003;61:87–92.
40. Mullins AE, Kam K, Parekh A, Bubu OM, Osorio RS, Varga AW.Obstructive sleep apnea and its treatment in aging: effects on Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Dis. 2020;145:105054.
41. Kjelsberg FN, Ruud EA, Stavem K.Predictors of symptoms of anxiety and depression in obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep Med. 2005;6:341–6.
42. Cho JW, Duffy JF. Sleep disorders and sexual dysfunction. World J. Mens Health. 2019;37(3):261–75.
43. Topuz MF, Oğhan F, Akdağ G, Gülhan PY, Erdoğan O, Arık Ö, Ceyhan A, Türe N, Güvey A.Effects of hypoxia on the vestibular system in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome observed on a video head impulse test. ENT Updates. 2021;11(3):148–52.
44. Lofaso F, Coste A, d'Ortho MP, Zerah-Lancner F, Delclaux C, Goldenberg F, Harf A.Nasal obstruction as a risk factor for sleep apnea syndrome. Eur Respir J. 2000;16:639–43.
45. Abbasi A, Gupta SS, Sabharwal N, Meghrajani V, Sharma S, Kamholz S, Kupfer Y.A compre­hensive review of obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep Sci. 2021;14(2):142–54.
F. Fernandes
Diagnosis: How Is Diagnosis Performed
https://t.me/medicina_free
EdilsonZancanella, BrunoBernardoDuarte, MichelBurihanCahali, andCarolinaFerrazde PaulaSoares
4.1 Clinical History
The diagnostic approach of any disease presupposes an investigation initiated by a detailed anamnesis, pertinent physical examination, and the elaboration of differen­tial diagnoses. The request for complementary tests aims to conrm the diagnosis, establish the criteria of severity, and assist in clinical considerations for the thera­peutic approach.
Anamnesis in sleep medicine also has its usefulness in identifying risk factors, con­ducting clinical research, and differential diagnoses of sleep diseases. It is well known that, in adults, the main symptom of sleep disease is excessive daytime sleepiness. However, it is also seen for clinical psychiatric and drug disorders [1]. To differentiate
4
E. Zancanella (*) Discipline of Otorhinolaryngology at the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
Sleep Medicine Service in the Otolaryngology Division, Hospital of Clinics, Campinas, Brazil
B. B. Duarte Otorhinolaryngology Service at Hospital PUC-Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
Discipline of Otorhinolaryngology at the Faculty of Medicine of the Pontical Catholic University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
M. B. Cahali Division of Sleep Medicine and Sleep Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology, Hospital das Clínicas, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Division of Sleep Medicine and Sleep Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology, Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
C. F. de PaulaSoares Otorhinolaryngology at Faculty Assis Gurgacz, Cascavel, Brazil
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 P. M. Baptista et al. (eds.), Obstructive Sleep Apnea,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35225-6_4
67
68
https://t.me/medicina_free
if the excessive daytime sleepiness is caused by Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA), it is crucial to carry out a complete clinical history and a complete sleep history, addressing various issues, such as sleep habits and the number of hours spent per night.
To make an adequate history considering a patient’s sleep, it is essential to know of the variability of normal sleep. If health professionals who work with sleep do not look at this peculiarity of sleep physiology, the clinical history will become inadequate. Sleep considered as “normal” must be interpreted through variables that include age group, culture, ethnicity, gender, genetics, and individual [2]. Roughly speaking, normal sleep occurs when an individual wakes up with a refreshing sleep sensation, without excessive daytime sleepiness, on the following day. However, this analysis is relatively supercial to a health professional who proposes to assist individuals with sleep complaints.
It is known that there are several risk factors for the development of snoring and OSA, so it is crucial to question them in the anamnesis of a patient with suspected obstructive sleep [3]. The following questions should always be present in a sleep anamnesis for these patients:
– When did the symptoms start? – Do symptoms correlate with weight gain? – Did symptoms start after starting new medications or alcohol use? – Have day and night symptoms worsened with increased frequency and intensity
of snoring?
– Is there a relationship between symptoms and menopause? – Is there a relationship with symptoms of gastroesophageal or pharyngeal–laryn-
geal reux?
– Is there a family history of nocturnal snoring or OSA?
E. Zancanella et al.
These questions are important because obesity, alcohol consumption, meno­pause, medications that cause muscle relaxation, and pharyngeal–laryngeal reux are risk factors for obstructive sleep breathing [3, 4]. In addition, some studies show a correlation between OSA and gastroesophageal reux (GERD) [5].
Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS), as the main symptom of sleep disorders in adults, can be evaluated objectively and subjectively. The objective instruments for assessing EDS are the wakefulness maintenance tests (MWT) and multiple sleep latencies (MSLT), which are tests that are difcult to logistic, and little used in clini­cal practice [1, 6]. The subjective instruments for evaluating EDS are sleep ques­tionnaires. In addition to the questionnaires to assess EDS, there are others specic to each sleep disease and assess patient’s quality of life with symptoms or after treatment [7]. These questionnaires will be covered below.
4.1.1 Sleep Questionnaires intheApproach totheOSA
Sleep questionnaires are essential for triaging severe cases, to measuring the impacts of sleep on individual life quality, deciding the best complementary sleep examina­tion method to be requested, monitoring the response to the proposed treatments, for epidemiological studies and [3].
Name:
T
In a car, while stopped for a few minutes in the traffic
https://t.me/medicina_free
4 Diagnosis: How Is Diagnosis Performed
69
4.1.1.1 Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)
ESS is currently the subjective test for evaluating drowsiness most used in clinical practice. It is relatively simple and self-administered, which quanties the risk of the individual falling asleep in 8 specic daily life situations [7]. Most studies con­sider that a score lower than 10 points means the absence of excessive daytime sleepiness. A score greater than or equal to 10 points is classied as excessive day­time sleepiness [8] (Fig.4.1).
Although widely used, its real value for patients with OSA is not yet fully estab­lished; often, even a patient with severe OSA may not present the symptom of ESS [9]. In a study to screen professional drivers for the diagnosis of OSA, low sensitiv­ity (53.2%) and low specicity (58.8%) were found for the diagnosis of moderate and severe OSA [9].
The ESS is reproducible when applied at different times; a study showed no changes in the values answered by the volunteers after 71 days of the applica­tion [10].
When the correlation between ESS and polysomnography values is checked, a study demonstrated that the higher the AHI value, the higher the ESS [8]. Another
THE EPWORTH SLEEPINESS SCALE
oday’s date: Your age (years):
Your sex (male = M; female = F):
How likely are you to doze off or fall asleep in the following situations, in contrast to feeling just tired? This refers to your usual way of life in recent times. Even if you have not done some of these things recently try to work out how they would have affected you. Use the following scale to choose the most appropriate number for each situation:
0 = would never doze 1 = slight chance of dozing 2 = moderate change of dozing 3 = high chance of dozing
Chance
of
dozingSituation
Sitting and reading Watching TV Sitting, inactive in a public place (e.g. a theater or a meeting) As a passenger in a car for an hour without a break Lying down to rest in the afternoon when circumstanc­ es permit Sitting and talking to someone Sitting quietly after a lunch without alcohol
Fig. 4.1 The Epworth Sleepiness Scale. (Taken from article [8])
70
https://t.me/medicina_free
study found that the ESS values were signicantly higher in severe OSA carriers when compared with mild and moderate apneas (p<0.001). However, no statistical difference was found in the ESS values between mild and moderate forms [11].
E. Zancanella et al.
4.1.1.2 Berlin Questionnaire
The Berlin questionnaire is a tool used to verify the probability of an individual hav­ing OSA.Unlike sleepiness scales, such as ESS, the evaluation by this questionnaire is directly related to the OSA entity. Therefore, it is recommended to be used in primary health units by family physicians to screen individuals who need to perform polysomnography [3].
This questionnaire uses symptom and physical examination data to achieve the nal score. It consists of 10 questions divided into three categories, including: (1) The severity of snoring, including a question about OSA (items 1–5 of the question­naire); (2) Excessive daytime sleepiness and fatigue (items 6–9); (3) Presence of systemic arterial hypertension or obesity (item 10). In addition, the questionnaire also includes information about age, gender, height, and weight [12].
If the individual responds positively to at least one item in two of the three cate­gories, it is classied as high risk for OSA.The Berlin questionnaire has a sensitiv­ity between 69 and 86%, and a specicity of 56–95%, with a positive predictive value ranging from 77 to 96% for OSA diagnosis in patients with such suspected disease [3]. In addition, a Korean study demonstrated a strong correlation between positive Berlin questionnaire results and AHI [12].
In clinical practice, the Berlin questionnaire has another practical utility in con­sultations performed by anesthesiologists before surgical procedures. Knowing the increased risk for anesthetic and surgical complications in patients with OSA, it is used in preanesthetic consultations to verify the need to perform a sleep monitoring test or prevent possible surgical and anesthetic complications in individuals with suspected OSA.
4.1.2 STOP-BANG Questionnaire
The STOP questionnaire was developed by Chung etal. [13] to be applied by anes­thesiologists in preanesthetic consultations to assess the suspected diagnosis of OSA.It consists of four YES/NO questions about snoring, physical fatigue, wit­nessed sleep breathing pauses, and systemic blood pressure. It presents a sensitivity of 79.5% and specicity of 48.6% to detect individuals with an AHI greater than 30 events per hour [13]. STOP is a mnemonic rule for the 4 English terms: Snoring, Tiredness, Observed apneas, and blood Pressure.
To increase the sensitivity and specicity of this questionnaire, it was proposed the addition of four factors to the STOP questionnaire: body mass index (BMI), age, cervical circumference, and gender. Thus, the STOP-BANG questionnaire was cre­ated, which increased sensitivity to almost 100%, although specicity decreased to 37% [14]. STOP-BANG obeys the mnemonic rule of English terms, namely:
4 Diagnosis: How Is Diagnosis Performed
https://t.me/medicina_free
Snoring, Tiredness, Observed apneas and blood Pressure (STOP), BMI, Age, Neck circumference, and Gender (BANG).
This questionnaire has the advantage of being very direct and applied quickly (usually takes about 1–2min). A score of at least three afrmative answers is used as a cutoff point to separate individuals with a low and high risk of having OSA [9].
71
4.2 Physical Examination intheDiagnosis ofOSA
The recognition of characteristics on physical examination, which are associated with the presence and/or severity of OSA clinical suspicion, allows early and indi­vidualized intervention for the patient. Despite having been the target of studies for more than 40years, there is no nding of high-specicity physical examination for the diagnosis of sleep apnea [15]. However, the heterogeneity of pathophysiological and clinical phenotypes may reason the absence of a characteristic sign. Still, sev­eral populations and case-control studies had shown anthropomorphic characteris­tics associated with the prevalence and severity of OSA and therapeutic success rates. In addition, a higher prevalence of OSA in middle age and male gender are highlighted [16].
Body mass index (BMI) is, admittedly, a measure of overweight and obesity is strongly correlated with OSA diagnosis [3].
A BMI greater than 25kg/m2 increases the risk of apnea by 2 times, and BMI greater than 30kg/m2 increases the risk four times [17]. Other measures related to body adiposity, such as neck circumference (NC) and the ratio between waist and hip, correlate with moderate OSA. Still, after correction with a model including BMI, NC, and waist-hip ratio, only BMI and NC are risk factors [16]. A NC of at least 40cm has a sensitivity of 61% and a specicity of 93% for OSA regardless of gender. Several diagnostic screening questionnaires containing age, gender, BMI, and NC showed high predictive diagnostic power [3, 12, 13, 18].
The specic physical examination of the upper airways has some relationships with the therapy to be indicated [1921]. Nasal alterations with associated septal deviation and of inferior turbinate hypertrophy have a higher prevalence among apneic rather than controlled-group individuals [19], without an association with the severity of OSA [22]. Nasal breathing difculties are related to poor adaptation to continuous pressure equipment (CPAP) [23] (Fig.4.2).
The oropharynx examination of the is subjectively standardized by the position of the structures within the cavity. We classied the palatine tonsils in 5°: 0 tonsils removed; 1 occupies less than 25% of the space between the sidewall and the mid­line; 2 occupies between 25 and 50% of the area between the lateral wall and the midline; 3 occupies more than 50% and less than 75% of the space between sidewall and midline; 4 occupies more than 75% up to 100% of the distance between the side walls and the midline. The actual volume of tonsils is agreed with subjective clas­sication, with a correlation between tonsillar hypertrophy and the presence of sleep apnea, but not with severity [24]. The position of the relaxed tongue inside the
72
Nature Reviews | Disease Primers
ab
cd
https://t.me/medicina_free
E. Zancanella et al.
Mandible
Tonsils
Epiglottis
Adenoids
2
Trachea
Uvula
3
Soft
palate
1
6
Tongue
4
Hyoid bone
Hard
palate
8
1
7
2
6
9
4
3
5
Fig. 4.2 (a) Normal anatomy. (b) Typical anatomical changes in obstructive sleep apnoea syn- drome (OSAS): a long soft palate and enlarged uvula (1); a reduced retroglossal pharyngeal airway space (2); an increased distance between the hyoid bone and the mandible(3); a shorter and more vertical mandible (4); a retro-position of the mandible, which is measured by the angle (retrogna­thia) (5); dental overbite or loss of normal dental occlusion (6); tonsillar hypertrophy (7); adenoid hypertrophy (8);and macroglossia (unusual large tongue) (9). [Lévy, P. etal. (2015) Obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers doi:10.1038/nrdp.2015.15]
ab
Fig. 4.3 Mallampati classication, Friedman adaptation et al. 1999. (a) Mallampati 1. (b) Mallampati 2. (c) Mallampati 3. (d) Mallampati 4
mouth concerning the palate is classied as the Mallampati index (Fig. 4.3). Alterations of the oropharynx (such as positioned retro palate, thick palate, and uvula, medialized tonsillar pillars, and tonsillar hypertrophy, grade 3 or 4) are asso­ciated with the presence of OSA [19, 21, 25]. The association of BMI, Mallampati classication and tonsils grade was organized into a model that predicts the OSA risk and the success of pharyngeal surgery. In adults, uvulopalatopharyngoplasty