Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_4538_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
26 Мб
Скачать
22
https://t.me/medicina_free
S. Op de Beeck et al.
associated with the upper airway collapse site [15]. A posteriorly located tongue, dened as narrowing of the airway due to posterior displacement of the tongue, is associated with a small NED, reected by a somewhat “at” ow shape. Isolated palatal collapse, i.e., collapse without the involvement of the tongue, and lateral wall collapse are associated with moderate NED, and epiglottic collapse with high NED, reected by a large and sharp inspiratory peak [15]. The presence of high NED during epiglottic collapse has recently been conrmed during DISE [16].
Azarbarzin etal. [17] showed it is possible to identify epiglottic collapse and palatal prolapse using nasal pressure airow shape. Epiglottic collapse was charac­terized by a rapid fall in inspiratory ow (discontinuity index), high variability in both inspiratory and expiratory ow (inspiratory and expiratory jaggedness) and reduced tidal volume (expressed as the ratio of peak expiratory ow and tidal vol­ume). Palatal prolapse, dened as “ballooning” of the palate into the nasopharynx during expiration, was shown to be associated with expiratory ow limitation quan­tied using the expiratory ow limitation index (EFLi) [18].
Recent research could also demonstrate the potential of predicting the site col­lapse during DISE from a separate routine baseline PSG.In this model, CCCp and lateral wall collapse were characterized by scoopy, left skewed breaths and opposed to tongue base and epiglottic collapse [19].
2.3 Upper Airway Collapsibility
Upper airway collapsibility is the second pathophysiological trait and can be regarded as both an anatomical and physiological trait (Fig.2.8). The higher the upper airway collapsibility, the easier the upper airway will collapse and the nar­rower the upper airway tends to be [20]. As such, patients with a higher collapsibil­ity will be more prone to suffer from apneas and hypopneas and will inherently be at greater risk of developing OSA [21, 22].
Upper airway collapsibility is inuenced by obesity [21] and greater in supine compared to lateral position [2325], but the inuence of sleep stage [2327] and sex [28, 29] is ambiguous. Collapsibility was shown to differ between REM and NREM stages [26, 27], although other studies did not seem to nd any differences [2325]. Sex alone does not seem to inuence upper airway collapsibility [28, 29]. However, if corrected for obesity, women tend to have a lower airway collapsibil­ity [29].
In patients with small NED values, the upper airway likely behaves as a Starling resistor [3033]. In a Starling resistor model, the upper airway is modeled as a col­lapsible segment surrounded by the noncollapsible nasal and tracheal segments [34]. If the upstream pressure at the nasal segment is lower than the critical closing pressure (P Flow limitation will occur if the downstream pressure is lower than P
), as dened by the surrounding tissue, the upper airway will collapse.
crit
, [26, 32,
crit
33]. However, in patients with large NED, the Starling resistor might not be the best
model to describe the upper airway. Alternative models are thus needed, and the
2 Pathophysiology ofObstructive Sleep Apnea
https://t.me/medicina_free
h/
dŚĞƌĂƉĞƵƟĐWW
ůĞǀĞů
ůŝŶŝĐĂůĐŽůůĂƉƐŝďŝůŝƚLJ
ƐĐŽƌĞ
23
W
ĚĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĂƟŽŶ
Đƌŝƚ
hƉƉĞƌĂŝƌǁĂLJ
ĐŽůůĂƉƐŝďŝůŝƚLJ
Fig. 2.8 Upper airway collapsibility can be assessed using different techniques: by determining the critical closing pressure of the upper airway or P (noninvasive measurement technique). Currently, there is no clinical standard measurement method that can be used for upper airway collapsibility assessment, yet the therapeutic CPAP level, clinical collapsibility score and determining the upper airway collapsibility index (UACI) using a wakefulness test holds promise for future clinical application
(gold standard) or using ow shape analysis
crit
ĂƐĞůŝŶĞW^'ĂŝƌŇŽǁ
ĂŶĂůLJƐŝƐ
Starling resistor might not be usable as a universal model for upper airway collaps­ibility [30, 35, 36].
Upper airway collapsibility can be measured using the gold-standard technique, which involves determining the critical closing pressure using upper airway pres­sure drops. However, due to the rigorousness of this method, this technique is not used in routine clinical practice. Furthermore, it has been shown feasible to use brief negative airway pulses in awake patients to determine the upper airway collapsibil­ity index [37, 38]. While this technique shows great potential for application in clinical practice, as it can be performed in awake patients, invasive techniques are still needed, including the catheter insertion. Regarding other potential clinical mea­sures, the therapeutic CPAP level predicts upper airway collapsibility [39], and a clinical score was developed to distinguish between male patients with high and low collapsibility [40]. Recently, however, a new innovative, noninvasive technique was developed to estimate upper airway collapsibility using the airow signal as recorded during diagnostic polysomnography (Fig.2.8).
2.3.1 Critical Closing Pressure (P
The gold-standard measurement technique involves determining the critical closing pressure (P
) using upstream (nasal) pressure drops. P
crit
nasal pressure at which the upper airway remains patent [33]. To measure P pressure at the nose is repeatedly lowered while simultaneously monitoring airow. After several pressure drops, a linear regression line is tted through the different
crit
)
is dened as the minimal
crit
, the
crit
24
https://t.me/medicina_free
S. Op de Beeck et al.
sample points. The physiological P
is dened as the zero-ow intercept from the
crit
linear portion of the ow-pressure curve [41].
P
can be measured under active (active P
crit
tions. The rst reports on measurements of P measure active P
, the pressure is rst dialed up to the holding pressure, dened as
crit
) or passive (passive P
crit
describe active P
crit
) condi-
crit
[22, 32, 33]. To
crit
the pressure at which all apneas, hypopneas and ow limited breaths are abolished, during steps of 5min each [33]. The holding pressure equals the “effective continu­ous positive airway pressure (CPAP)” or “upper airway opening pressure” [26, 42]. In a next step, the critical closing pressure is determined. Active P
is determined
crit
by gradually lowering the upper airway pressure. At each pressure level, ow is measured. This is repeated until no stable breathing can be achieved anymore. The results are then plotted on a pressure–ow curve, and a linear regression line is esti­mated. The x-intercept of this line, where ow is zero, is the critical closing pressure [32, 33]. To assess passive P
, ow is dropped to different pressure levels from the
crit
holding pressure. After each pressure drop, the pressure is set back to the holding pressure [4, 43]. In contrast to the active method, the passive method minimizes the recruitment of upper airway muscles.
Upper airway collapsibility can also be quantied using ventilatory parameters. The higher the ventilation at a certain nasal pressure, the less collapsible the airway and vice versa [4, 43]. This method is based on the measurement methods that were previously described in the literature for P
[4, 25, 32, 33]. However, instead of
crit
measuring pressure, ow is measured. Briey, to assess both passive and active V0 (ventilation at 0cm H2O) in one run, the mask pressure is rst dialed up to the hold­ing pressure. Passive V0 is determined by dialing down the pressure to 0cm H2O during 5 breaths. To determine active V0, the pressure is lowered from the holding pressure until the minimal pressure level (CPAP
) is achieved at which no arousals
min
occur. Active V0 is then determined by an active drop [43].
Recently, P
could be measured during DISE, showing a more reliable P
crit
crit
mea­surement using the ventilation method. Furthermore, patients with CCCp showed a wide range of P
values, indicating no clear association between P
crit
and CCCp [44].
crit
2.3.2 Clinical Techniques
In awake patients, upper airway collapsibility can be assessed with the upper airway collapsibility index (UACI). The UACI is measured by applying brief (250ms) pulses of negative airway pressure (12cm H2O) during awake early inspiration and is calculated as the pressure difference between the choanae and the epiglottis during the brief pulse [37, 38]. Although collapsibility in awake conditions is sys­tematically lower compared to during sleep, the UACI is signicantly correlated with P
measurements [38]. A recent study even showed that the UACI value could
crit
separate individuals with subatmospheric P atmospheric values [37]. While this technique shows great promise as a potential clinical method, the invasiveness and used materials hamper its applicability.
values from individuals with supra-
crit
x
2 Pathophysiology ofObstructive Sleep Apnea
https://t.me/medicina_free
25
Another method that could be applied in clinical practice was recently developed by Genta etal. [40]. Combining NREM-OAI/AHI, waist circumference, obstructive apnea duration and REM-AHI in a clinical score was able to predict a P
>2.5cm
crit
H2O.A clinical score 3 showed a sensitivity of 90.9% and specicity of 84.3%, highlighting the potential clinical value of this method. Furthermore, in patients (previously) treated with CPAP, the therapeutic CPAP level can also be used as a surrogate for collapsibility [39]. Specically, a therapeutic CPAP level of ≤8cm H2O showed a sensitivity of 75% and specicity of 91% in an independent dataset for having a mildly collapsible upper airway.
2.3.3 Baseline PSG Airflow Analysis
Several problems arise in using the above explained gold-standard methods to mea­sure P the technique and the need for trained personnel overnight. No clinically applicable method is currently available in routine clinical practice.
Azarbarzin etal. [45]. They showed that active P both peak and mid-inspiratory ow (as measured during natural NREM sleep) as well as active tions. The rationale of this study was based on the construction of the pressure–ow curve and the assumption that a change in pressure (x-intercept) is partly captured by the ow (y-intercept) [45].
minimal ventilation at normal ventilatory drive is dened as passive ventilation (V contrast, ventilation at maximal ventilatory drive, just preceding arousal, is dened as active ventilation (V
V
while V
including the requirement of specialized equipment, the invasiveness of
crit,
A noninvasive method to determine collapsibility was recently developed by
was signicantly correlated with
crit
, the maximal ow at atmospheric pressures under active condi-
ma
Alternatively, ventilation parameters can be used to dene collapsibility. The
). V
passive
thus reects the inherent collapsibility of the upper airway during sleep,
passive
is the ventilation at which no additional muscles are recruited. By
passive
). At V
active
considers upper airway muscle activity [4, 43, 46].
active
, upper airway muscles are optimally recruited.
active
2.4 Ventilatory Control Stability
The most commonly used ventilatory control parameter is loop gain, a measure of the sensitivity of the ventilatory chemical control system. Loop gain can be seen as a central component of sleep apnea and is calculated as the ratio of the ventilatory response and its associated ventilatory disturbance (Fig.2.9) [47]. A loop gain at a phase angle of 180° between 0 and 1 will result in a stable system. A ventilatory disturbance will lead to a ventilatory response with a smaller magnitude than the initial disturbance, eventually returning to the original ventilation level. A loop gain closer to 0 will lead to a faster return to the initial ventilation level, signifying a more stable control system. A loop gain of 1 results in a cyclical ventilation,
26
a
https://t.me/medicina_free
S. Op de Beeck et al.
b
Fig. 2.9 Loop gain is dened as the ratio of a ventilatory disturbance and its associated ventilatory reaction. (a) Example of ventilation with a loop gain equaling 0.75. A ventilatory disturbance (orange arrow) causes a ventilatory reaction (blue arrow) with a magnitude of 75% of the initial (orange arrow) disturbance. In turn, the ventilatory response (blue arrow) becomes a ventilatory disturbance, causing a ventilatory reaction (red arrow) of 75% of its magnitude, nally resulting in a restoration of the initial ventilation. (b) Example trace of loop gain of 1. A ventilatory distur­bance in a system with a loop gain of 1 will result in an unstable system. A loop gain of 1 will cause a ventilatory response (blue arrow) with the same magnitude as the initial disturbance (orange arrow). (Based on Wellman etal. [47])
uctuating around the initial ventilation level. A loop gain higher than 1 will cause highly unstable breathing, as the ventilatory response will be higher than the venti­latory disturbance. If the loop gain is 1, a return to the initial ventilation is only possible with external measures (e.g., arousal).
The major determinants of loop gain are plant gain and controller gain. Controller gain determines the response to a change in concentration of CO2, while plant gain is the amount that CO2 changes for a given change in ventilation [48].
Loop gain can be measured using a gold-standard measurement technique or using recently developed noninvasive measurement methods (Fig.2.10). Currently, no clinical standard method is available. However, recently Messineo etal. showed that breath- holding maneuvers during wakefulness is associated with loop gain [49]. Patients with a higher loop gain showed a shorter maximal breath-hold dura­tion and a more signicant ventilatory response to 20-s breath-holds [49]. This tech­nique, as such, shows promise for future clinical applications.
2.4.1 Airflow Pressure Drops
The gold-standard measurement technique involves the use of airow pressure drops. As the upper airway has a collapsible segment, the upper airway can be held
2 Pathophysiology ofObstructive Sleep Apnea
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 2.10 Loop gain can be measured using airow pressure drops (gold standard) or using PSG ow analysis (noninvasive technique). Currently, no clinical measurement method is available, but recently Messineo etal. [49] developed a new technique using breath holding
ŝƌŇŽǁ
ƉƌĞƐƐƵƌĞĚƌŽƉƐ
27
ƌĞĂƚŚͲŚŽůĚ
ĚƵƌĂƟŽŶ
ĂƐĞůŝŶĞW^'
ĂŝƌŇŽǁĂŶĂůLJƐŝƐ
>ŽŽƉŐĂŝŶ
open using positive pressure. Like the gold-standard method to determine the P
crit
determination of loop gain also requires pressure drops.
To measure loop gain, the mask pressure (P
) is abruptly lowered by decreas-
mask
ing the applied pressure from the holding level, dened as the minimal pressure needed to keep the upper airway patent. After a minor delay, the upper airway mus­cles will be recruited to increase airow and partially restore ventilation. Under the reduced pressure, a new steady-state ventilation will be achieved. The difference between the normal ventilation and the new steady state is called the disturbance. Due to this suboptimal new steady state, CO2 will accumulate in the body and ven­tilatory drive increases. The mask pressure is dialed up again to the normal level to measure this ventilatory drive. The ventilatory sensitivity will cause an overshoot in ventilation (response). Loop gain is dened as the ratio of the response and the dis­turbance [4]. In general, loop gain is measured during NREM sleep and tends to be lower in REM compared to NREM sleep [50].
2.4.2 Baseline PSG Airflow Analysis
The rationale behind the noninvasive technique using ow signals to measure loop gain, is that the apneas and hypopneas that naturally occur during sleep, will cause disturbances in ventilation [51]. These disturbances will cause a change in the ventilatory drive. The magnitude of this change is determined by loop gain (ratio of response and disturbance). By tting a ventilatory control model, adjusted for changes in ventilatory drive due to arousals and/or changes in chem­ical concentrations, loop gain can be calculated from a standard baseline poly­somnography [51].
A second ventilatory control stability parameter is the ventilatory response to arousal, dened as the increase in ventilatory drive attributed to arousal from sleep [51, 52]. The ventilatory response to arousal cannot be explained by an increase in chemical drive, which is attributed to loop gain [46].
,
28
https://t.me/medicina_free
S. Op de Beeck et al.
2.5 Pharyngeal Muscle Responsiveness
During the transition between wake and sleep, the odds of collapse are higher due to a decrease in muscle activity. Pharyngeal muscle responsiveness is dened as a patient’s ability to prevent or overcome upper airway collapse by recruiting the upper airway muscles during sleep. In addition, high pharyngeal muscle responsive­ness implies strong muscle recruitment to keep the upper airway patent, reducing the chances of upper airway collapse.
Pharyngeal muscle responsiveness can be measured using a gold-standard tech­nique involving diaphragm EMG measurements using pressure drops or ow analy­sis techniques (Fig.2.11).
2.5.1 Airflow Pressure Drops
As for the other traits, the gold-standard technique to measure pharyngeal muscle response requires pressure drops. By dropping the upper airway pressure from the holding pressure to suboptimal pressures, ventilation will also suddenly drop. This drop in ventilation will cause an increase in ventilatory drive achieved by an increase in pharyngeal muscle activity. In turn, the increased muscle activity will lead to rise in ventilation toward a new, suboptimal steady-state ventilation.
The gold-standard method to measure muscle activity uses intramuscular elec­trodes. In this way, muscular activity can be determined as the response to the intra­luminal pressure associated with lowering the applied pressure from the holding pressure [53].
Alternatively, ventilation measures during airow pressure drops can dene upper airway muscle responsiveness. Using this technique, the difference between the ventilation immediately after the airow pressure drop and the new, suboptimal, steady state is dened as the pharyngeal muscle responsiveness [4].
Fig. 2.11 Upper airway muscle responsiveness can be measured using airow pressure drops (gold standard) or using PSG ow analysis (noninvasive technique)
ŝƌŇŽǁ
ƉƌĞƐƐƵƌĞ
ĚƌŽƉƐ
ŶŽĐůŝŶŝĐĂů
ƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚ
ĂƐĞůŝŶĞW^'
ĂŝƌŇŽǁ
ĂŶĂůLJƐŝƐ
WŚĂƌLJŶͲ ŐĞĂůŵƵƐĐůĞ ƌĞƐƉŽŶƐŝǀĞͲ
ŶĞƐƐ
2 Pathophysiology ofObstructive Sleep Apnea
https://t.me/medicina_free
29
2.5.2 Baseline PSG Airflow Analysis
Using polysomnography signal analysis, pharyngeal muscle compensation is calcu­lated based on ventilatory parameters. As described earlier, passive ventilation is dened as the ventilation at which no additional muscles are recruited. Furthermore, active ventilation is the ventilation just before arousal, at maximal ventilatory drive and as such at maximal muscle recruitment. Therefore, compensation is dened by the difference between active ventilation (V
) and passive ventilation (V
active
passive
) [46].
2.6 Arousal Threshold
Arousal threshold is the threshold at which an arousal stimulus will lead to an arousal response [54]. This arousal stimulus can be external (e.g., noise) but can also be triggered by the central nervous system [55, 56]. An internal trigger can be an increased ventilatory drive to restore ventilation during a ventilatory disturbance. The arousal threshold is then dened as the ventilatory drive causing arousal.
An increased ventilatory drive will activate and stiffen the upper airway muscles. Therefore, a high arousal threshold allows the ventilatory drive to rise to levels needed for the upper airway muscles to restore ventilation [57]. However, a high arousal threshold is also associated with longer apneas/hypopneas and can cause deeper oxygen desaturations. By contrast, a low arousal threshold is associated with an increased propensity to wake up, preventing stable sleep and perpetuating cycli­cal breathing [57].
Arousal threshold can be assessed using invasive gold-standard techniques or noninvasive alternatives including ow analysis. Currently, there is no clinical stan­dard method available; however, a model including clinical parameters was recently developed (Fig.2.12).
Fig. 2.12 The arousal threshold can be measured using airow pressure drops (gold standard) or using baseline polysomnography (PSG) analysis (noninvasive technique). Currently, no clinical standard method is available; however, a model using clinical parameters shows potential for future clinical application
/ŵƉŽƐĞĚ ƉƌĞƐƐƵƌĞ
ĚƌŽƉƐ
ůŝŶŝĐĂů
ƉĂƌĂŵĞƚĞƌƐ
ĂƐĞůŝŶĞW^'
ƉĂƌĂŵĞƚĞƌƐ
ƌŽƵƐĂů
dŚƌĞƐŚŽůĚ
30
https://t.me/medicina_free
S. Op de Beeck et al.
2.6.1 Airflow Pressure Drops
Like the previously described techniques, the gold-standard technique to determine arousal threshold includes pressure drops. To assess arousal threshold, adequate ventilatory drive measurements are needed. This can be achieved by measuring epi­glottic pressure, diaphragm EMG or esophageal pressure or mathematical modeling.
Using an epiglottic catheter, the arousal threshold is determined as the epiglottic pressure immediately preceding an arousal [57]. Similarly, diaphragm activity can be measured using an intraesophageal diaphragm EMG catheter. Using esophageal pressure measurements, increasing or decreasing pressure swings reect increasing or decreasing ventilatory drive [5759].
In another method [4], ventilatory drive is determined using a mathematical model with parameters derived from the individual ventilation signal. An exponen­tial decay characterizes ventilation after an arousal. The delay and time constant characterizing this exponential decay can be used to determine the ventilatory drive at each time point during a ventilatory disturbance. This method assumes that the delay and time constant of the increase in ventilatory drive (which is modeled) equals the time constant and delay of ventilation after arousal (which is observed). As such, these parameters can be used to model the ventilatory drive in time. The calculated ventilatory drive before arousal, is then dened as the arousal threshold.
2.6.2 Clinical Parameters
Alternative techniques to determine the arousal threshold have been developed. Edwards etal. [57] showed that combining the apnea–hypopnea index, oxygen satu­ration and the fraction of hypopneas could estimate the chance of a patient having a low arousal threshold (dened as less than 15cm H2O peak epiglottic pressure). However, this metric is not able to determine the exact arousal threshold.
2.6.3 Baseline PSG Airflow Analysis
Furthermore, recently, an algorithm to estimate the arousal threshold was developed by Sands etal. [58]. This algorithm was based on the method of Wellman etal. [4] in which the ventilatory drive was modeled based on the exponential decay of the ventilatory signal. However, instead of using external pressure drops to provoke airow disturbances, the naturally occurring apneas and hypopneas in OSA patients are used.
2 Pathophysiology ofObstructive Sleep Apnea
https://t.me/medicina_free
31
2.7 Interplay Between theDifferent
Pathophysiological Traits
To prevent OSA, the major traits of each OSA patient must interact to produce sta­ble breathing during sleep that does not cause arousal [60].
To show the interactions between the different traits, the traits can be plotted on a graph of ventilatory drive against ventilation (Fig.2.13) [4, 43]. When the airway is patent during resting breathing (eupnea), ventilation matches the ventilatory drive (V
). The arousal threshold is dened as the ventilatory drive at which a patient
eupnea
arouses and can be plotted as a vertical line (green dashed line). V ventilation that can be tolerated without arousal. Loop gain is then dened as the reciprocal of the slope connecting V by V
Fig. 2.13 Interplay between the different pathophysiological traits. The pathophysiological traits can be plotted on a graph explaining ventilation as a function of ventilatory drive. (Based on Wellman etal. [43])
, which is the ventilation that can be achieved through the upper airway
passive
eupnea
and V
. Passive collapsibility is reected
arousal.
is the lowest
arousal