Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3720_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана
.pdf
The Impact of Thrombus as a Cause and as a Result of Complicated PCI Chapter | 14 213
https://t.me/med1917
FIGURE 14.7 Thrombus embolization during percutaneous coronary intervention of a right coronary artery chronic total occlusion (RCA
CTO). A 64-year-old man presented with stable angina and newly diagnosed decreased left-ventricular systolic function. (A) Angiography revealed an
RCA CTO (yellow arrow) with a clear proximal cap, length 50 mm, septal and epicardial collaterals. (B and C) The RCA ostium was engaged with an
8-Fr Amplatz Left 1 and the left coronary ostium was engaged with an 8-Fr EBU 3.75 guide catheter. The CTO was successfully crossed using the
CrossBoss catheter (yellow arrow) and the “fast spin” technique (“true to true” crossing), as confirmed on orthogonal projections (yellow arrow). (D)
The lesion was predilated with a 2.5 30-mm ba lloon and intravascular ultrasound revealed underexpanded stents and neointimal hyperplasia. (E) The
lesion was predilated multiple times with a 3.5 15-mm Angiosculpt balloon followed by implantation of a 3.5 38 -mm drug-eluting stent (DES) in
the mid-RCA and a 4.0 28-mm DES in the proximal RCA, covering the ostium. Postdilation was performed with a 3.5 25-mm noncompliant
balloon and a 4.0 8-mm Ostial flash balloon (yellow arrow). (F and H) Final angiography revealed a lesion at the distal RCA bifurcation (yellow
arrow), followed by occlusion of the right posterolateral branch (yellow arrow). Activate d clotting time was 259 s. Aspiration thrombectomy with an
Export catheter (Medtronic) retrieved a large thrombus (a s confirmed by histologic examination [G]), (I) followed by restorat ion of antegrade TIMI 3
flow in all distal branches.

214 Cardiovascular Thrombus
https://t.me/med1917
Treatment of coronary complications leading to coronary thrombus formation should consist of (1) general treatment
measures for coronary thrombus (Fig. 14.2) and (2) specific treatment of the underlying coronary complication (Fig. 14.4).
For example, coronary dissection is treated with stent implantation (ensuring that guidewire position is not lost), stent
underexpansion is treated with high-pressure balloon inflations, and equipment loss or entrapment is treated with retrieval
of the lost coverage or by covering it with stents.
CONCLUSIONS
Coronary thrombus can be both the cause and the result of coronary complications. An intensive antithrombotic regimen
that combines antithrombin and antiplatelet treatments is critical to preventing and managing thrombus. A stepwise
systematic approach to the management of thrombotic lesions could improve the likelihood of restoring antegrade flow,
while minimizing the risk of distal embolization or other complications. Treating the underlying coronary pathology that
led to thrombus formation during PCI is important for minimizing its consequences and reducing the risk for recurrence.
DISCLOSURES
Dr. Karacsonyi: none.
Dr. Ungi: none.
Dr. Banerjee: research grants from Gilead and the Medicines Company; consultant/speaker honoraria from Covidien and Medtronic; ownership
in MDCARE Global (spouse); intellectual property in HygeiaTel.
Dr. Henry: none.
Dr. Brilakis: consulting/speaker honoraria from Abbott Vascular, Asahi, Cardinal Health, Elsevier, GE Healthcare, and St. Jude Medical;
research support from Boston Scientific and InfraRedx; spouse is employee of Medtronic.
REFERENCES
[1] Shemisa K, Karatasakis A, Brilakis ES. Management of guidewire-induced distal coronary perforation using autologous fat particles versus coil
embolization. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv February 01, 2017;89(2):253e8. Epub 2016/05/05. eng, 27143506.
[2] Tarar MN, Christakopoulos GE, Brilakis ES. Successful management of a distal vessel perforation through a single 8-French guide catheter:
combining balloon inflation for bleeding control with coil embolization. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv September 2015;86(3):412e6. Epub 2015/04/
10. eng, 25854795.
[3] Sandoval Y, Lobo AS, Brilakis ES. Covered stent implantation through a single 8-French guide catheter for the management of a distal coronary
perforation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv March 17, 2017. Epub 2017/03/18. eng, 28303639.
[4] Brilakis ES, Grantham JA, Banerjee S. “Ping-pong” guide catheter technique for retrograde intervention of a chronic total occlusion through an
ipsilateral collateral. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv September 01, 2011;78(3):395e9. Epub 2010/11/10. eng, 21061243.
[5] O’Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, Casey Jr DE, Chung MK, de Lemos JA, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of
ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice
Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol January 29, 2013;61(4):e78e140. Epub 2012/12/22. eng, 23256914.
[6] Echavarria-Pinto M, Lopes R, Gorgadze T, Gonzalo N, Hernandez R, Jimenez-Quevedo P, et al. Safety and efficacy of intense antithrombotic
treatment and percutaneous coronary intervention deferral in patients with large intracoronary thrombus. Am J Cardiol June 15,
2013;111(12):1745e50. 23528026.
[7] De Maria GL, Alkhalil M, Oikonomou EK, Wolfrum M, Choudhury RP, Banning AP. Role of deferred stenting in patients with ST elevation
myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Intervent Cardiol March 28,
2017. 28370496.
[8] Escaned J, Echavarria-Pinto M, Gorgadze T, Gonzalo N, Armengol F, Hernandez R, et al. Safety of lone thrombus aspiration without concomitant
coronary stenting in selected patients with acute myocardial infarction. EuroIntervention February 22, 2013;8(10):1149e56. 23425541.
[9] Brilakis ES, Lichtenwalter C, Banerjee S. “Armored” aspiration catheter technique to enhance aspiration catheter delivery in challenging thrombus-
containing lesions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv November 15, 2009;74(6):846e9. 19496134.
[10] Stys AT, Stys TP, Rajpurohit N, Khan MA. A novel application of GuideLiner catheter for thrombectomy in acute myocardial infarction: a case
series. J Invasive Cardiol November 2013;25(11):620e4. 24184899.
[11] Stys A, Stys T, Khan M, Rajpurohit N. What to do when your aspiration thrombectomy catheter gets overwhelmed. Cath Lab Dig 2015;23(3).
[12] Ben-Dor I, Maluenda G, Pichard AD, Satler LF, Gallino R, Lindsay J, et al. The use of excimer laser for complex coronary artery lesions. Cardiovasc
Revasc Med 2011 ;12(1):69.e1e8. Epub 2011/01/19. eng, 21241980.
[13] Topaz O, Minisi AJ, Morris C, Mohanty PK, Carr Jr ME. Photoacoustic fibrinolysis: pulsed-wave, mid-infrared laser-clot interaction. J Thromb
Thrombolysis 1996;3(3):209e14. Epub 1996/01/01. eng, 10613984.
[14] Badr S, Ben-Dor I, Dvir D, Barbash IM, Kitabata H, Minha S, et al. The state of the excimer laser for coronary intervention in the drug-eluting stent
era. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 2013 ;14(2):93e8. Epub 2013/01/22. eng, 23332778.

The Impact of Thrombus as a Cause and as a Result of Complicated PCI Chapter | 14 215
https://t.me/med1917
[15] Topaz O, Minisi AJ, Bernardo NL, McPherson RA, Martin E, Carr SL, et al. Alterations of platelet aggregation kinetics with ultraviolet laser
emission: the “stunned platelet” phenomenon. Thromb Haemost October 2001;86(4):1087e93. Epub 2001/11/01. eng, 11686328.
[16] Dorr M, Vogelgesang D, Hummel A, Staudt A, Robinson DM, Felix SB, et al. Excimer laser thrombus elimination for prevention of distal
embolization and no-reflow in patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction: results from the randomized LaserAMI study. Int J Cardiol
March 02, 2007;116(1):20e6. Epub 2006/08/08. eng, 16891005.
[17] Stone GW, Webb J, Cox DA, Brodie BR, Qureshi M, Kalynych A, et al. Distal microcirculatory protection during percutaneous coronary inter-
vention in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Assoc March 02, 2005;293(9):1063e72.
15741528.
[18] Carrozza Jr JP, Mumma M, Breall JA, Fernandez A, Heyman E, Metzger C. Randomized evaluation of the TriActiv balloon-protection fl ush and
extraction system for the treatment of saphenous vein graft disease. J Am Coll Cardiol November 01, 2005;46(9):1677e83. Epub 2005/11/01. eng,
16256868.
[19] Farooq V, Serruys PW, Mustafa AH, Mamas MA, Malik N, Alhous HA, et al. Forward and back aspiration during ST-elevation myocardial
infarction: a feasibility study. EuroIntervention April 08, 2016;11(14):e1639e48. 27056124.
[20] Assali AR, Sdringola S, Ghani M, Denkats AE, Yepes A, Hanna GP, et al. Intracoronary adenosine administered during percutaneous intervention in
acute myocardial infarction and reduction in the incidence of “no reflow” phenomenon. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv September 2000;51(1):27e31.
discussion 2, 10973014. Epub 2000/09/06. eng.
[21] Fischell TA, Subraya RG, Ashraf K, Perry B, Haller S. “Pharmacologic” distal protection using prophylactic, intragraft nicardipine to prevent no-
reflow and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction during elective saphenous vein graft intervention. J Invasive Cardiol February 2007;19(2):58e62.
Epub 2007/02/03. eng, 17268038.
[22] Zoghbi GJ, Goyal M, Hage F, Meyers RP, Papapietro SE, Brott BC, et al. Pretreatment with nitroprusside for microcirculatory protection in
saphenous vein graft interventions. J Invasive Cardiol February 2009;21(2):34e9. Epub 2009/02/03. eng, 19182287.
[23] Michaels AD, Appleby M, Otten MH, Dauterman K, Ports TA, Chou TM, et al. Pretreatment with intragraft verapamil prior to percutaneous
coronary intervention of saphenous vein graft lesions: results of the randomized, controlled vasodilator prevention on no-reflow (VAPOR) trial.
J Invasive Cardiol June 2002;14(6):299e302. Epub 2002/06/04. eng, 12042618.
[24] Ali A, Cox D, Dib N, Brodie B, Berman D, Gupta N, et al. Rheolytic thrombectomy with percutaneous coronary intervention for infarct size
reduction in acute myocardial infarction: 30-day results from a multicenter randomized study. J Am Coll Cardiol July 18, 2006;48(2):244e52.
16843170.
[25] Parodi G, Valenti R, Migliorini A, Maehara A, Vergara R, Carrabba N, et al. Comparison of manual thrombus aspiration with rheolytic throm-
bectomy in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation Cardiovascular interventions June 2013;6(3):224e30. 23735474.
[26] Vergara R, Valenti R, Migliorini A, Parodi G, Giurlani L, Marrani M, et al. Rheolytic thrombectomy for acute myocardial infarction complicated by
cardiogenic shock. J Invasive Cardiol December 2016;28(12):E193e7. 27187985.
[27] Svilaas T, Vlaar PJ, van der Horst IC, Diercks GF, de Smet BJ, van den Heuvel AF, et al. Thrombus aspiration during primary percutaneous
coronary intervention. N Engl J Med February 07, 2008;358(6):557e67. Epub 2008/02/08. eng, 18256391.
[28] Vlaar PJ, Svilaas T, van der Horst IC, Diercks GF, Fokkema ML, de Smet BJ, et al. Cardiac death and reinfarction after 1 year in the Thrombus
Aspiration during Percutaneous coronary intervention in Acute myocardial infarction Study (TAPAS): a 1-year follow-up study. Lancet June 07,
2008;371(9628):1915e20. Epub 2008/06/10. eng, 18539223.
[29] Frobert O, Lagerqvist B, Olivecrona GK, Omerovic E, Gudnason T, Maeng M, et al. Thrombus aspiration during ST-segment elevation myocardial
infarction. N Engl J Med October 24, 2013;369(17):1587e97. 23991656.
[30] Olivecrona GK, Lagerqvist B, Frobert O, Gudnason T, Maeng M, Ramunddal T, et al. Impact of thrombus aspiration during ST-Elevation
Myocardial Infarction: a six month composite endpoint and risk of stroke analyses of the TASTE trial. BMC Cardiovasc Disord April 01,
2016;16:62. Pubmed Central PMCID: 4818511. Epub 2016/04/03. eng, 27036735.
[31] Jolly SS, Cairns JA, Yusuf S, Meeks B, Pogue J, Rokoss MJ, et al. Randomized trial of primary PCI with or without routine manual thrombectomy.
N Engl J Med April 9, 2015;372(15):1389e98. 25853743.
[32] Jolly SS, Cairns JA, Yusuf S, Rokoss MJ, Gao P, Meeks B, et al. Outcomes after thrombus aspiration for ST elevation myocardial infarction: 1-year
follow-up of the prospective randomised TOTAL trial. Lancet January 09, 2016;387(10014):127e
26474811.
[33] Jolly SS, James S, Dzavik V, Cairns JA, Mahmoud KD, Zijlstra F, et al. Thrombus aspiration in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: an
individual patient meta-analysis: Thrombectomy Trialists Collaboration. Circulation January 10, 2017;135(2):143e52. 27941066.
[34] Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, Bailey SR, Bittl JA, Cercek B, et al. 2015 ACC/AHA/SCAI focused update on primary percutaneous
coronary intervention for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: an update of the 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous
coronary intervention and the 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American
College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and
Interventions. Circulation March 15, 2016;133(11):1135e47. 26490017.
[35] Roffi M, Patrono C, Collet JP, Mueller C, Valgimigli M, Andreotti F, et al. 2015 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in
patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: Task force for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting
without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J January 14, 2016;37(3):267e315. 26320110.
[36] Lagerqvist B, Frobert O, Olivecrona GK, Gudnason T, Maeng M, Alstrom P, et al. Outcomes 1 year after thrombus aspiration for myocardial
infarction. N Engl J Med September 18, 2014;371(12):1111e20. 25176395.
35. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC5007127,

216 Cardiovascular Thrombus
https://t.me/med1917
[37] Stone GW, Maehara A, Witzenbichler B, Godlewski J, Parise H, Dambrink JH, et al. Intracoronary abciximab and aspiration thrombectomy in
patients with large anterior myocardial infarction: the INFUSE-AMI randomized trial. J Am Med Assoc May 02, 2012;307(17):1817e26.
22447888.
[38] Sardella G, Mancone M, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Agati L, Scardala R, Carbone I, et al. Thrombus aspiration during primary percutaneous coronary
intervention improves myocardial reperfusion and reduces infarct size: the EXPIRA (thrombectomy with export catheter in infarct-related artery
during primary percutaneous coronary intervention) prospective, randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol January 27, 2009;53(4):309e15. Epub 2009/
01/24. eng, 19161878.

Chapter 15
https://t.me/med1917
Stent Thrombosis: Early, Late, and Very
Late
Thomas E. Watts, Arka Chatterjee and Massoud A. Leesar
University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
The advent of coronary artery stenting greatly improved the safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention
(PCI), as it offered reduced rates of acute vessel closure and improved long-term patency rates. In the early phase of
balloon angioplasty the procedure’s associated morbidity, mortality, and rates of need for emergent coronary artery bypass
surgery due to dissections, acute vessel closure, and perforations were a source of great concern. For example, acute
occlusion rates of 6.8% were encountered in the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute registry [1]. Coronary stents
were then developed to maintain vessel patency postangioplasty, to manage acute occlusion, and to decrease substantially
the rate of restenosis. However, stent thrombosis became the most recognized complication of coronary stenting.
DEFINITION OF STENT THROMBOSIS
Prior to 2007 no standard definition of stent thrombosis was available. Early studies with both bare metal stents (BMSs)
and drug-eluting stents (DESs) used varying definitions and timings of occurrence and levels of certainty when adjudicating stent thrombosis as a clinical end point [2]. Only in 2007 did the Academic Research Consortium (ARC) propose
standard criteria describing the certainty of thrombus diagnosis, timing, and mechanisms of stent thrombosis [2]. These
definitions are as follows:
1. Acute stent thrombosis occurs from time 0 to 24 h after stent implantation.
2. Subacute stent thrombosis occurs 24 h to 30 days after stent implantation.
3. Late stent thrombosis occurs 30 days to 1 year after stent implantation.
4. Very late stent thrombosis occurs more than 1 year after stent implantation [2].
As for the level of certainty pertaining to the identification of stent thrombosis, definite stent thrombosis is an event in
which there are new ischemic symptoms, electrocardiographic (ECG) changes, rise and fall of cardiac biomarkers, and
angiographic or pathologic evidence of stent thrombosis [2]. Probable stent thrombosis includes any unexplained death
within 30 days of stent implantation or any myocardial infarction in the territory of the previously implanted stent without
angiographic confirmation of stent thrombosis and without any other cause [2]. Possible stent thrombosis is defined as any
unexplained death more than 30 days after stent implantation [2]. Armed with these definitions, studies of BMSs and DESs
then became more consistent with adjudicating clinical end points and with accuracy in defining the incidence of stent
thrombosis as newer-generation stents were introduced and improvements in medical therapy achieved.
INCIDENCE OF STENT THROMBOS IS
During the initial era of coronary stent utilization, only stainless steel, self-expanding scaffolds were applied. They were
used as a “bailout” technology for management of acute vessel closure during percutaneous coronary angioplasty. In this
setting, despite the presence of adequate pharmacotherapeutic systemic anticoagulation, the rate of stent thrombosis
remained as high as 20% [3]. Then, even with the addition of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) of aspirin and dipyridamole,
Cardiovascular Thrombus. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812615-8.00015-6
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
217

218 Cardiovascular Thrombus
https://t.me/med1917
the stent occlusion rate remained as high as 24% in these self-expanding stainless steel scaffolds [4]. Acute coronary
syndrome (ACS), chronic occlusion, and interruption of anticoagulation were all factors that led to higher stent thrombosis
rates [4]. In the sentinel study that randomized patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) and noncomplex lesions
to revascularization with balloon expandable stents versus percutaneous balloon angioplasty all patients were treated with
systemic anticoagulation, aspirin, dipyridamole, and postdilation after stent implantation. The findings indicated that
in-hospital stent thrombosis rates were lowered to a rate of 3.5% [5]. However, long-term outcomes were not reported [5].
Further evaluation regarding the optimal antiplatelet and anticoagulant regimens reported stent thrombosis rates as low as
0.5%e0.8% at 30 days with the use of aspirin and ticlopidine as a DAPT combination, which was superior to aspirin and
warfarin or aspirin and phenprocoumon, or aspirin alone [6,7]. DESs were designed to prevent restenosis and the need for
repeat revascularization. Despite the initial concerns, the incidence of stent thrombosis in DES is similar to that in BMSs,
ranging from 0.6% to 3.2% for BMS and from 0.6% to 3.4% for the DES [8].
The BMS and DES, as well as bio-resorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) DES, were developed to prevent neointimal
hyperplasia, prevent luminal restenosis, and decrease meaningfully the need for target-lesion revascularization. Concerns
were raised based on the experience of the original trials that, with the special patt ern of continued DES drug delivery as
accompanied by delayed endothelialization and hypersensitivity reactions, the rate of stent throm bosis was higher than
those observed with the BMS [9e12]. In an initial pooled analysis of the RAVEL, SIRIUS, and TAXUS trials comparing
first-generation sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting DESs versus BMSs, the incidence of stent thrombosis was higher in DES
than in BMS [13]. In a subsequent pooled analysis of these same trials that readjudicated all events applying the previously
mentioned ARC definitions of de finite, probable, and possible stent thrombosis, there was no difference in the rates of
stent thrombosis between first-generation DESs and BMSs at 1 and 4 years of follow-up, with rates of 1.5%e1.8% and
1.4%e1.7%, respectively [14]. Furthermore, although the first-generation DES had improved rates of restenosis and
target-lesion revascularization, data suggested that following the planned discontinuation of DAPT there was an increase in
late clinical events with DES compared with BMS. Definite late stent thrombosis rates of 2.6% and 1.3%, respectively,
were observed [10]. Very late stent thrombosis (>1 year after implantation) among patients who received the firstgeneration DES occurred at a rate of 0.4%e0.6% per year [15]. The second-generation DES, with everolimus and
zotarolimus as the drug coating, represented the newer polymer coatings’ capabilities. This resulted in improved rates of
1-year definite stent thrombosis to 1.2% and 0.3%, respectively [16]. A comprehensive network meta-analysis comparing
49 trials, including all types of BMS and DES, found that the cobaltechromium everolimus-eluting stent had the lowest
rate of stent thrombosis at 30 days and this finding persisted at 1 and 2 years of follow-up [17].
Most recently, the BVSs were specifically designed and introduced in an effort to eliminate the clinical phenomena of
late stent restenosis and thrombosis. The technical rationale for the utilization of BVSs was to provide temporary initial
mechanical support and scaffolding to the treated lesion’s site while delivering adequate restenosis-inhibiting drug therapy
with intent to enable later on resolution of the stent’s material with consequent restoration of normal vasomotor responses.
This technological approach also aimed at decreasing the need for coronary artery bypass surgery for lesion recurrence.
However, experience with the first generation of these devices raised valid questions concerning the phenomenon of
scaffold thrombosis (ScT). The 3-year results from the ABSORB II study showed higher thrombosis rates (3% vs. 0%)
with BVS [18]. Identical observations were made in the 2015 ABSORB III trial, whereby a non-statistically signifi
difference existed in the rate of device thrombosis at 1 year, 1.5% in BVS versus 0.7% in DES [19]. A meta-analysis of
seven high-quality randomized trials comparing BVS with DES denotes these findings as well, with a pooled estimate rate
of stent thrombosis of 2.4% versus 0.7%. Notably, the incidence of ScT remained over time higher than that found with
metallic stents, i.e., in the early, late, and very late periods [20]. Recurrent ScT is another significant concern, with several
studies reporting rates of this unwarranted phenomenon in the range of 5.9%e18.8% [21e24].
cant
CLINICAL PRESENTATION, DIAGNOSIS, AND MORTALITY
The clinical presentation of stent thrombosis can vary based on the clinical context, the pathophysiologic mechanism, and
the related coronary anatomy. Patients can present with sudden death or develop ACS with corresponding abnormal
myocardial biomarkers and accompanying ischemic ECG changes in the leads reflecting the territory of the event-related
vessel. Some patients, in fact, can be asymptom atic despite the presence of stent thrombosis, especially those with
collateral vessels supplying the territory at risk [8]. The gold standard diagno sis of stent thrombosis is a filling defect on
coronary angiography, indicating the presence of thrombus within the lumen of the stented segment of the vessel [8].
Intravascular imaging with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and especially with the optical coherence tomography (OCT)
technology can be used to solidify the diagnosis and to identify the pathophysiologic mechanism [8]. Mortality after stent
thrombosis is high, with reported incidence of 11%e42% [15,21e35]. Like the clinical presentation, mortality in this

Stent Thrombosis Chapter | 15 219
https://t.me/med1917
scenario depends on factors such as acuity of presentation, pathophysiologic mechanism, the coronary anatomy, and
whether the initial stent implantation was for the clinical picture of ACS or for non-ACS. A significant study comparing the
outcome for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) caused by de novo coronary thrombosis
versus by stent thrombosis found lower reperfusion rates (80.4% vs. 93.9%) and higher distal embolization rates (6.5% vs.
0%) in patients with stent thrombosis [27].
PATHOPHYSIOLOGIC MECHANISMS OF STENT THROMBOSIS
Stent thrombosis can be caused by various mechanisms. Patient-related factors, pharmacologic factors, lesion- and
procedure-related factors, and postprocedural factors can play a role. Overall, the development of thrombus within the
lumen of a stent can be the result of one or more of the following: activation of the extrinsic coagulation cascade from
exposure to subendothelial tissue, to stent struts, or to the polymer coatings; inadequate inhibition of platelet activation;
activation of the intrinsic coagulation cascade from low shear stress due to slow coronary flow; or the presence of a
prothrombotic state [8]. In a post hoc analysis of the ACUITY trial patient-related factors, including insulin-dependent
diabetes, renal insufficiency, baseline hemoglobin, and the extent of CAD, were all associated with higher rates of stent
thrombosis [27]. In a substudy of the HORIZONS-AMI trial procedural factors identified by IVUS, including minimal
luminal area <5mm
with early stent thrombosis [36]. Another report from a meta-analysis discovered that early discontinuation of DAPT, total
stent length, and the extent of underlying CAD were the most important predictors of stent thrombosis [37]. The Dutch
Stent Thrombosis Registry analyzed experience with 21,009 patients who underwent BMS or DES implantation for either
stable CAD or ACS. The average follow-up was 30.9 months [22] and the rate of definite stent thrombosis was 2.1% [22].
Compared with matched control subjects, patients with stent thrombosis were more likely to have stent undersizing,
malignancy, coronary artery atherosclerosis proximal or distal to the stented lesion, diabetes mellitus, coronary dissection,
stented bifurcation lesion, left-ventricular ejection fraction of <30%, peripheral arterial disease, the use of a DES, younger
age, or interrupted aspirin or clopidogrel treatment [22]. Patients who had stents implant ed for stable CAD had a lower rate
of stent thrombosis (1%) compared with the 1.8% rate in the non-ST-segment elevation type of ACS (NSTE-ACS) and the
4.3% rate in STEMI patients [22]. The patients with stents implanted for STEMI management developed more early stent
thrombosis compared with NSTE-ACS patients and with stable CAD patients, who exhibited more late and very late stent
thrombosis [22]. In a group of patients who had stents placed for stable CAD and presented with subacute stent thrombosis,
a cause for the thrombosis was identified by IVUS in 78% of the patients. Intriguingly, more than one cause accountable
for stent thrombosis was identified in 48% of the patients [38]. A majority of these patients had a reduced luminal area
(<80% of the reference lumen) due to stent underexpansion and malapposition [38]. Coronary dissection and tissue
protrusion were commonly identified as well [38]. In an autopsy study that examined patients who had a first-generation
sirolimus- or paclitaxel-eluting DES implanted more than 30 days prior to death, delayed arterial healing and less stent
endothelization were more common than in a control group of patients who had a BMS [39]. Stent malapposition, delayed
arterial healing, hypersensitivity reactions (Fig. 15.1), stent strut penetrating a necrotic core, and bifurcation stenting were
all associated with increased rates of late stent thrombosis in the first-generation group [39]. Incomplete stent apposition as
well may be the result of positive vessel wall remodeling from chronic inflammation and delayed arterial healing that lead
to necrosis and vessel erosion surrounding the stent [40]. Neoatherosclerosis with neointimal plaque rupture is another
important cause of very late stent thrombosis in both DESs and BMSs [41]. Stent fracture can also serve as a nidus for the
formation of stent thrombosis, especially in tortuous and angulated right coronary arteries. The rate of stent fracture in firstgeneration DESs is reported to be from 0.8% to 7.7% in one review [42].
Sotomi et al. reviewed 100 case reports of reported ScT with intravascular imaging to categorize the mechanical causes
behind ScT [43]. Figs. 15.2 and 15.3 demonstrate examples of OCT imaging that was applied for the identification of the
causes of ScT. In resonance with DES thrombosis a stent malapposition was the most common cause of both early and late,
and very late, ScT. Deviceevessel mismatch is another mechanism of stent thrombosis cause, which needs to be differentiated from the concept of “undersizing.” This implies deployment of a larger scaffold relative to vessel caliber, which
then creates a high density of polymer within a small area, thus increasing thrombogenicity. Acute disruption to varying
degrees was observed in ScT cases whereby near-complete disruption created a loss of structural integrity and device
recoil. Among cases with late and very late ScT the late discontinuity of nonendothelialized struts may be a major
mechanical precipitant of thrombus formation. Overlap of scaffolds can contribute to stent thrombosis in two fashions: the
inner struts in the overlap segment do not endothelialize and the larger effective strut size in the “stacked” overlap zone can
cause increased neointimal response. Neoatherosclerosis has been detected as well in late ScT cases. A noteworthy finding
is the presence of peristrut low-intensity areas
2
, stent malapposition, plaque protrusion, edge dissection, and residual stenosis, were all associated
, especially in post-ACS patients who have ScT. These areas are thought to

220 Cardiovascular Thrombus
https://t.me/med1917
(A) (B)
(C)
FIGURE 15.1 (A) Angiogram of a patient with anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who received a Cypher DES 3 years prior to
presentation demonstrating a thrombotic occlusion of the mid-left anterior descending artery. (B) Angiogram following antegrade flow restoration with
balloon angioplasty. Intravascular ultrasound was performed to elucidate the cause of thrombosis. (C, D) Smaller reference diameters distally and
proximally. (E) Acquired malapposition of the stent because of the presence of a large aneurysm (white double arrows) probably related to hypersensitivity reactions as reported with the Cypher DES. DES, drug eluting stent.
(D)
(E)
be in a peristrut inflammation process per histology studies. Animal studies suggest that inflammation triggered by BVS
struts may be significantly more than that affecting everolimus-eluting cobaltechromium stents [44].
PHARMACOTHERAPY
DAPT had been shown early on as effective pharmacotherapy for rate reduction of stent thrombosis. Initially the use of
aspirin and ticlopidine was shown to be superior to aspirin a lone or aspirin and warfarin in the STARS trial [6]. Further
studies using clopidogrel compared with ticlopidine showed similar rates of cardiac events with better patient compliance
and fewer noncardiac side effects [45e47]. Newer P2Y12 inhibitors prasugrel and ticagrelor demonstrated improved
platelet inhibition and decreased rate of stent thrombosis compared with clopidogrel in the TRITON-TIMI 38 and PLATO
trials, respectively [48,49]. In 2016 the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association issued a focused
updated guideline document on DAPT with recommendations for the agent of choice, as well as the duration of therapy, for
BMSs and DESs in the treatment of stable CAD and ACS, for rate reduction of stent thrombosis as balanced with bleeding
risks [50]. With low stent thrombosis rates associated with second- and third-generation DESs, very large trials are required
to detect any difference in stent thrombosis based on DAPT duration. The DAPT study randomized 9961 patients
12 months after DES implantation to continue DAPT or placebo for an additional 18 months [51]. The prolonged DAPT
group had a significantly lower incidence of stent thrombosis (0.4% vs. 1.4%), albeit at a cost of increased moderate or
severe bleeding (2.5% vs. 1.6%). The study investigators also used these data to create a personalized score for individual
patients to assist clinicians in reaching a decision concerning prolonged versus curtailed DAPT duration. This score is
based on nine simple variables [52]. With an emphasis on personalized medicine in the current era it is also possible that
genotype determination for clopidogrel metabolism will assist in pairing the patient with the proper antiplatelet medication
and, consequently, decrease the phenomenon of stent thrombosis. The IGNITE registry data suggest that patients with
loss-of-function alleles for the CYP2C19 gene carry a significantly higher incidence of adverse events with clopidogrel
treatment [53]. At the time of publication, the TAILOR-PCI (Tailored Antiplatelet Therapy Following PCI) trial, a randomized trial, is under way to investigate the effects of genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy in patients post-PCI and is
expected to provide further guidance. It should be noted that proper DAPT duration for BVS is difficult to “set in stone,” as
most patients with late or very late ScT in clinical trials had stopped DAPT. Thus, a prolonged period of treatment should
be preferable in the management of BVS patients [54].

Stent Thrombosis Chapter | 15 221
https://t.me/med1917
(A)
(C)
(B)
(D)
FIGURE 15.2 (A) An example of incomplete strut apposition: there are four malapposed struts between the ten and the twelve o’clock positions. (B)
Tissue prolapse: in the presence of tissue prolapse as defined by tissue protruding between the struts, the prolapsed area was measured as the difference
between the stent and the luminal area (highlighted in green in B2). (C) An example of edge dissection (arrow) distal to the BVS. (D) A BVS strut
fracture/disruption. This cross section at the level of the left anterior descending artery (LAD)ediagonal (D1) carina depicts a scaffold pattern irregularity
with an overhanging strut (arrow) located in the center of the vessel without obvious connection to the expected/adjacent strut pattern. BVS, bio-resorbable
vascular scaffold.
Intraprocedural anticoagulation also plays a role in the prevention of stent thrombosis, mostly the acute stent thrombosis. Both unfractionated heparin and bivalirudin are well studied and accepted as anticoagulants for PCI that utilizes
either BMS or DES. Nevertheless, although associated with less bleeding, bivalirudin has been associated with an
increased risk of acute stent thrombosis [55]. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors and unfractionated heparin have been
shown to prevent acute stent thrombosis in patients with STEMI; however, in the current era of more potent P2Y12
inhibitors their role is less appreciated [56].
INTRAVASCULAR IMAGING: IDENTIFICATION OF POTENTIAL MECHANISMS/STENT
OPTIMIZATION
As mentioned previously, intravascular imaging with IVUS and OCT is critical for determination of the mechanistic
etiology of stent thrombosis. However, along with the initial intervention of stent implantation both modalities can be used

222 Cardiovascular Thrombus
https://t.me/med1917
(A)
FIGURE 15.3 (A) Early scaffold thrombosis (ScT): 6 days post-scaffold implantation for inferior STEMI. OCT revealed malapposition in the proximal
part of the scaffold as the key mechanism for the development of ScT. (B) OCT images from ScT taken 8 days after the scaffold implantation for nonSTEMI. Three-dimensional reconstruction OCT images reveal deviceevessel mismatch as the key mechanism for ScT formation. OCT, optical coherence
tomography; STEMI, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
(B)
to guide appropriate stent sizing and to optimize the results, thus leading to better outcomes and less stent thrombosis. A
meta-analysis examining the outcome of IVUS-g uided PCI in DES placement found that the rate of stent thrombosis was
less in IVUS-guided versus angiography-guided PCI with DES [57]. A trial comparing OCT-guided against IVUS-guided
versus angiography-guided PCI found that in addition to IVUS, the OCT technology is an effective tool for appropriate
stent sizing and optimization of PCI [58]. The effectiveness of intravascular imaging for PCI optimization can probably be
attributed to several factors, including improved stent sizing, optimal stent apposition, greater minimal luminal area, and
early detection of edge dissection.
CONCLUSION
Since the early phase of the introduction of coronary stenting to interventional cardiology improvements in stent design,
procedural techniques and pharmacologic strategies have greatly reduced the risk of stent thrombosis. However, despite
these advances, stent thrombosis remains an important phenomenon and clinical entity. This complication, especially in
regard to the newly developed BVS systems, requires recognition, accurate diagnosis, and proper management. It is hoped
that continued advancements in device design, increased usage of intravascular imaging for device optimization, and
personalized targeted pharmacotherapy will result in a meaningful additional decrease in the incidence of this serious
clinical problem.
REFERENCES
[1] Detre K, Holubkov R, Kelsey S, et al. One-year follow-up results of the 1985e1986 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute’s Percutaneous
Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty Registry. Circulation 1989;80:421e8.
[2] Cutlip DE, Windecker S, Mehran R, et al. Clinical endpoints in coronary stent trials: a case for standardized definitions. Circulation
2007;115:2344e51.
[3] de Feyter PJ, DeScheerder I, van den BM, Laarman G, Suryapranata H, Serruys PW. Emergency stenting for refractory acute coronary artery
occlusion during coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 1990;66:1147e50.
[4] Serruys PW, Strauss BH, Beatt KJ, et al. Angiographic follow-up after placement of a self-expanding coronary-artery stent. N Engl J Med
1991;324:13e7.
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
