Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3720_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
30 Мб
Скачать
160 Cardiovascular Thrombus
https://t.me/med1917
[61] Burke AP, Farb A, Malcom GT, Liang YH, Smialek J, Virmani R. Coronary risk factors and plaque morphology in men with coronary disease who
died suddenly. N Engl J Med 1997;336(18):1276e82.
[62] Motoyama S, Sarai M, Harigaya H, Anno H, Inoue K, Hara T, et al. Computed tomographic angiography characteristics of atherosclerotic plaques
subsequently resulting in acute coronary syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54(1):49e57.
[63] Motoyama S, Ito H, Sarai M, Kondo T, Kawai H, Nagahara Y, et al. Plaque characterization by coronary computed tomography angiography and
the likelihood of acute coronary events in mid-term follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015;66(4):337e46. [64] Falk E. Why do plaques rupture? Circulation 1992;86(6 Suppl):III30e42. [65] Zhao Z, Witzenbichler B, Mintz GS, Jaster M, Choi SY, Wu X, et al. Dynamic nature of nonculprit coronary artery lesion morphology in STEMI: a
serial IVUS analysis from the HORIZONS-AMI trial. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;6(1):86e95. [66] Nair A, Margolis MP, Kuban BD, Vince DG. Automated coronary plaque characterisation with intravascular ultrasound backscatter: ex vivo
validation. EuroIntervention 2007;3(1):113e20. [67] Haro LH, Decker WW, Boie ET, Wright RS. Initial approach to the patient who has chest pain. Cardiol Clin 2006;24(1). 1e17, v. [68] Antman EM, Cohen M, Bernink PJ, McCabe CH, Horacek T, Papuchis G, et al. The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non-ST elevation MI: a
method for prognostication and therapeutic decision making. J Am Med Assoc 2000;284(7):835e42. [69] Granger CB, Goldberg RJ, Dabbous O, Pieper KS, Eagle KA, Cannon CP, et al. Predictors of hospital mortality in the global registry of acute
coronary events. Arch Intern Med 2003;163(19):2345e53. [70] Beltrame JF. Assessing patients with myocardial infarction and nonobstructed coronary arteries (MINOCA). J Intern Med 2013;273(2):182e5. [71] Rouan GW, Lee TH, Cook EF, Brand DA, Weisberg MC, Goldman L. Clinical characteristics and outcome of acute myocardial infarction in patients
with initially normal or nonspecic electrocardiograms (a report from the Multicenter Chest Pain Study). Am J Cardiol 1989;64(18):1087e92. [72] Maznyczka A, Kaier T, Marber M. Troponins and other biomarkers in the early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. Postgrad Med
2015;91(1076):322e30. [73] Apple FS, Pearce LA, Smith SW, Kaczmarek JM, Murakami MM. Role of monitoring changes in sensitive cardiac troponin I assay results for early
diagnosis of myocardial infarction and prediction of risk of adverse events. Clin Chem 2009;55(5):930e7. [74] Garcia-Garcia HM, Jang IK, Serruys PW, Kovacic JC, Narula J, Fayad ZA. Imaging plaques to predict and better manage patients with acute
coronary events. Circ Res 2014;114(12):1904e17. [75] Foy AJ, Liu G, Davidson Jr WR, Sciamanna C, Leslie DL. Comparative effectiveness of diagnostic testing strategies in emergency department
patients with chest pain: an analysis of downstream testing, interventions, and outcomes. J Am Med Assoc Intern Med 2015;175(3):428e36. [76] Saeian K, Rhyne TL, Sagar KB. Ultrasonic tissue characterization for diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in the coronary care unit. Am J
Cardiol 1994;74(12):1211e5. [77] Garg P, Underwood SR, Senior R, Greenwood JP, Plein S. Noninvasive cardiac imaging in suspected acute coronary syndrome. Nat Rev Cardiol
2016;13(5):266e75. [78] Kontos MC, Arrowood JA, Jesse RL, Ornato JP, Paulsen WH, Tatum JL, et al. Comparison between 2-dimensional echocardiography and
myocardial perfusion imaging in the emergency department in patients with possible myocardial ischemia. Am Heart J 1998;136(4 Pt 1):724e33. [79] Litt HI, Gatsonis C, Snyder B, Singh H, Miller CD, Entrikin DW, et al. CT angiography for safe discharge of patients with possible acute coronary
syndromes. N Engl J Med 2012;366(15):1393e403. [80] Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, Casey Jr DE, Ganiats TG, Holmes Jr DR, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of
patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force
on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2014;130(25):e344e426. [81] Cowley MJ, DiSciascio G, Rehr RB, Vetrovec GW. Angiographic observations and clinical relevance of coronary thrombus in unstable angina
pectoris. Am J Cardiol 1989;63(10):108Ee13E. [82] Alpert DH, Hirsh PD, Cowley MJ, Vetrovec GW. Angiographic demonstration of plaque ssure associated with acute coronary occlusion. Am
Heart J 1989;117(1):185e6. [83] Vetrovec GW, Cowley MJ, Overton H, Richardson DW. Intracoronary thrombus in syndromes of unstable myocardial ischemia. Am Heart J
1981;102(6 Pt 2):1202e8. [84] Kerensky RA, Wade M, Deedwania P, Boden WE, Pepine CJ. Veterans Affairs Non QWISi-HTI. Revisiting the culprit lesion in non-Q-wave
myocardial infarction. Results from the VANQWISH trial angiographic core laboratory. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39(9):1456e63. [85] Ambrose JA, Winters SL, Stern A, Eng A, Teichholz LE, Gorlin R, et al. Angiographic morphology and the pathogenesis of unstable angina
pectoris. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985;5(3):609e [86] Layland J, Carrick D, McEntegart M, Ahmed N, Payne A, McClure J, et al. Vasodilatory capacity of the coronary microcirculation is preserved in
selected patients with non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2013;6(3):231e6. [87] Layland J, Oldroyd KG, Curzen N, Sood A, Balachandran K, Das R, et al. Fractional ow reserve vs. angiography in guiding management to
optimize outcomes in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the British Heart Foundation FAMOUS-NSTEMI randomized trial. Eur
Heart J 2015;36(2):100e11. [88] Sels JW, Tonino PA, Siebert U, Fearon WF, Vant Veer M, De Bruyne B, et al. Fractional ow reserve in unstable angina and non-ST-segment
elevation myocardial infarction experience from the FAME (Fractional ow reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study. JACC
Cardiovasc Interv 2011;4(11):1183e9. [89] Barbato E, Toth GG, Johnson NP, Pijls NH, Fearon WF, Tonino PA, et al. A prospective natural history study of coronary atherosclerosis using
fractional ow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;68(21):2247e55.
16.
Acute Coronary Syndrome: Thrombotic Lesions in Patients With Unstable Angina Chapter | 10 161
https://t.me/med1917
[90] Nair A, Kuban BD, Tuzcu EM, Schoenhagen P, Nissen SE, Vince DG. Coronary plaque classication with intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency
data analysis. Circulation 2002;106(17):2200e6.
[91] Gyongyosi M, Yang P, Hassan A, Weidinger F, Domanovits H, Laggner A, et al. Arterial remodelling of native human coronary arteries in patients
with unstable angina pectoris: a prospective intravascular ultrasound study. Heart 1999;82(1):68e74.
[92] Gyongyosi M, Yang P, Hassan A, Domanovits H, Laggner A, Weidinger F, et al. Intravascular ultrasound predictors of major adverse cardiac
events in patients with unstable angina. Clin Cardiol 2000;23(7):507e15.
[93] Batty JA, Subba S, Luke P, Gigi LW, Sinclair H, Kunadian V. Intracoronary imaging in the detection of vulnerable plaques. Curr Cardiol Rep
2016;18(3):28.
[94] Sinclair H, Bourantas C, Bagnall A, Mintz GS, Kunadian V. OCT for the identication of vulnerable plaque in acute coronary syndrome. JACC
Cardiovasc Imaging 2015;8(2):198e209.
[95] Tanaka A, Imanishi T, Kitabata H, Kubo T, Takarada S, Tanimoto T, et al. Morphology of exertion-triggered plaque rupture in patients with acute
coronary syndrome: an optical coherence tomography study. Circulation 2008;118(23):2368e73.
[96] Mizuno K, Satomura K, Miyamoto A, Arakawa K, Shibuya T, Arai T, et al. Angioscopic evaluation of coronary-artery thrombi in acute coronary
syndromes. N Engl J Med 1992;326(5):287e91.
[97] Hiruta N, Uchida Y, Maezawa Y, Shimoyama E, Uchida Y. Molecular imaging of apolipoprotein B-100 in human coronary plaques by color
uorescent angioscopy and microscopy. Int Heart J 2013;54(2):68e74.
[98] RofM, Patrono C, Collet JP, Mueller C, Valgimigli M, Andreotti F, et al. 2015 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes
in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: Task Force for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2016;37(3):267e315.
[99] Oler A, Whooley MA, Oler J, Grady D. Adding heparin to aspirin reduces the incidence of myocardial infarction and death in patients with unstable
angina. A meta-analysis. J Am Med Assoc 1996;276(10):811e5.
[100] Petersen JL, Mahaffey KW, Hasselblad V, Antman EM, Cohen M, Goodman SG, et al. Efcacy and bleeding complications among patients
randomized to enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin for antithrombin therapy in non-ST-Segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: a systematic overview. J Am Med Assoc 2004;292(1):89e96.
[101] Stone GW, McLaurin BT, Cox DA, Bertrand ME, Lincoff AM, Moses JW, et al. Bivalirudin for patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J
Med 2006;355(21):2203e16.
[102] Effects of tissue plasminogen activator and a comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in unstable angina and non-Q-wave
myocardial infarction. Results of the TIMI IIIB Trial. Thrombolysis in Myocardial Ischemia. Circulation 1994;89(4):1545e56.
[103] Antithrombotic Trialists C, Baigent C, Blackwell L, Collins R, Emberson J, Godwin J, et al. Aspirin in the primary and secondary prevention of
vascular disease: collaborative meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomised trials. Lancet 2009;373(9678):1849e60.
[104] Giugliano RP, White JA, Bode C, Armstrong PW, Montalescot G, Lewis BS, et al. Early versus delayed, provisional eptibatide in acute coronary
syndromes. N Engl J Med 2009;360(21):2176e90.
[105] Valgimigli M, Biondi-Zoccai G, Tebaldi M, vant Hof AW, Campo G, Hamm C, et al. Tiroban as adjunctive therapy for acute coronary
syndromes and percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Eur Heart J 2010;31(1):35e49.
[106] Schwartz GG, Olsson AG, Ezekowitz MD, Ganz P, Oliver MF, Waters D, et al. Effects of atorvastatin on early recurrent ischemic events in acute
coronary syndromes: the MIRACL study: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Assoc 2001;285(13):1711e8.
[107] Fanning JP, Nyong J, Scott IA, Aroney CN, Walters DL. Routine invasive strategies versus selective invasive strategies for unstable angina and
non-ST elevation myocardial infarction in the stent era. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;(5):CD004815.
[108] Fox KA, Clayton TC, Damman P, Pocock SJ, de Winter RJ, Tijssen JG, et al. Long-term outcome of a routine versus selective invasive strategy in
patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome a meta-analysis of individual patient data. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55(22):2435e45.
[109] Sianos G, Morel MA, Kappetein AP, Morice MC, Colombo A, Dawkins K, et al. The SYNTAX Score: an angiographic tool grading the
complexity of coronary artery disease. EuroIntervention 2005;1(2):219e27.
[110] De Ferrari GM, Fox KA, White JA, Giugliano RP, Tricoci P, Reynolds HR, et al. Outcomes among non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary
syndromes patients with no angiographically obstructive coronary artery disease: observations from 37,101 patients. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care 2014;3(1):37e45.
[111] Writing Committee M, Thomas RJ, King M, Lui K, Oldridge N, Pina IL, et al. AACVPR/ACCF/AHA 2010 update: performance measures on
cardiac rehabilitation for referral to cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention services: a report of the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on performance measures (Writing Committee to develop clinical performance measures for cardiac rehabilitation). Circulation 2010;122(13):1342e50.
[112] Holmes Jr DR, Dehmer GJ, Kaul S, Leifer D, OGara PT, Stein CM. ACCF/AHA clopidogrel clinical alert: approaches to the FDA boxed
warning: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on clinical expert consensus documents and the American Heart Association endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;56(4):321e41.
[113] Price MJ, Berger PB, Teirstein PS, Tanguay JF, Angiolillo DJ, Spriggs D, et al. Standard- vs high-dose clopidogrel based on platelet function
testing after percutaneous coronary intervention: the GRAVITAS randomized trial. J Am Med Assoc 2011;305(11):1097e105.
Chapter 11
https://t.me/med1917
Practical Perspectives on the Guidelines for Management of Coronary Thrombus
Oliver P. Guttmann, Amir Orlev, Krishnaraj S. Rathod, Daniel A. Jones and Elliot J. Smith
Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
INTRODUCTION
Thrombus is a distinctive histopathological feature of patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and constitutes an adverse nding that signicantly affects interventional management. Although angiography seems to un­derestimate the presence of thrombi, they are very frequently detected in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and tend to be larger than in non-ST-elevation ACS. Sianos et al. [1] reported that up to 91.6% of STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI showed intracoronary (IC) thrombosis at angiography. Thrombus may also complicate other complex anatomic conditions associated with an altered ow, such as ectatic or aneurysmal coronary arteries, degenerate venous grafts, or previous coronary stents. A large thrombus burden has been associated with PCI failure in patients with STEMI in previous retrospective, nonrandomized studies [1e3]. In the largest such study [3], among 900 patients with STEMI treated with primary or rescue PCI, the presence of large thrombus (30% of cases) was strongly associated with higher rates of impaired ow measured by TIMI (thrombolysis in myocardial infarction) ow grade <3 and nal myocardial blush grade (MBG) grade 0/1, resulting in increased mortality at 2 years (adjusted hazard ratio 1.66 [1.04, 2.68], P ¼ .04). This chapter presents the authorsper­spectives on thrombus management as reected in the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology (AHA/ACC) guidelines, depicts exemplary cases, and describes select exceptions to these guidelines.
PROGNOSTIC SIGNIFICANCE OF THROMBUS
The grading and classication of coronary thrombi [4,5] are important tools for management decisions and therapy assessment in coronary interventions. A detailed description of these concepts is presented in Chapter 12 in this book.
The presence of thrombus in the coronary circulation is predictive of poor prognosis and a well-known risk factor for long-term adverse cardiovascular events, including distal embolization, stent thrombosis, and inhibition of myocardial perfusion [1,3,6e11]. The risk appears to be proportional to the size and composition of the thrombus. Studies indicate that distal embolization is very common, with rates of up to 18%. This leads to higher incidence of slow/no-reow rates and, therefore, lower procedural success rates. Patients with distal embolization during primary PCI also present with lower left­ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), increased troponin, and Creatine Kinase (CK) elevation and have an increased in­hospital and late mortality rates [11e14]. In addition to size and thrombus composition, TIMI ow grade before PCI, target lesion length, and vessel diameter are predictors of distal embolization [6,15]. Thrombi with a high erythrocyte component have been shown to be associated with distal embolization [7,16]. Hence, predicting thrombus burden and its composition before primary PCI may affect consequent decisions concerning adjunctive antithrombotic drugs and, potentially, adding aspiration. This process is crucial for both angiographic and clinical outcomes through improvement of the epicardial ow and myocardial perfusion.
Cardiovascular Thrombus. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812615-8.00011-9
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
163
164 Cardiovascular Thrombus
https://t.me/med1917
MANAGEMENT OF HIGH THROMBUS BURDEN
The removal of thrombus before any other step of intervention may dramatically decrease the risk of no ow, and has the potential for survival improvement; however, the optimal approach for thrombus-containing lesions is still evolving. Current management guidelines offer thrombus removal with standard mechanical aspiration catheters combined with pharmacotherapy; however, additional devices and techniques are available as well. These include proximal or distal anti­embolic protection devices (EPDs) and higher technology devices with power-based mechanical energy allowing frag­mentation and removal of thrombus. This concept is delineated in Chapter 12 in this book.
Overall, our perspective is that studies of thrombectomy before stenting have produce d conicting results and there is no guideline-based consensus as t o their routine use in lesions containing thrombus. Other direct thrombus man­agement options include covered and self-expandable stents or deferred stenting after prolonged infusion of antith­rombotic drugs.
PHARMACOLOGICAL STRATEGIES FOR INTRACORONARY THROMBUS
This topic is detailed in Chapter 12 in this book. In brief, the pharmacotherapy available in the cardiac catheterization suite includes glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors, the direct thrombin inhibitor bivalirudin, and thrombolytic agents. Postprocedural options include antiplatelet therapy, prolonged use of GP IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors, low-molecular-weight heparin, direct thrombin inhibitors, and factor Xa inhibitors.
Most of the studies that support the use of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors in ACS were performed before the routine use of P2Y12 inhibitors and other anticoagulants such as fondaparinux. There have been studies that have investigated their use in patients undergoing PCI for STEMI and have looked specically at the timing of use and route of administration in addition to the dual antiplatelet therapy. Localized directed IC administration of abciximab in the infarct-related artery has attracted some research interest. The theoretical advantage of this approach is provision of a higher concentration of active drug at the site of thrombus, given that abciximab has a short plasma half-life. The INFUSE-AMI trial was a randomized 2 2 factorial single-blinded trial of STEMI patients with left an terior descending artery (LAD) occlusion undergoing PCI. In this study, all patients received dual antiplatelet therapy with patients randomized to a single 0.25 mg/kg IC bolus of abciximab with bivalirudin versus bivalirudin alone, as well as manual aspiration thrombectomy versus PCI alone. The primary end point was 30-day infarct size, which was assessed with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. The study found that there was a 2.3% reduction in the primary end point with the use of IC abciximab (15.1% vs. 17.9%; P ¼ .03). However, early markers of microcirculatory reperfusion (MBG and ST-segment resoluti on [STR]) wer e not improved. Furthermore, the improvement in infarct size at 30 days was modest and much less than what was considered clinically relevant at the start of the study [17].
The signicantly larger (n ¼ 2065) trial termed AIDA STEMI (Abciximab Intracoronary vs. Intravenous Drug Application in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) compared IC bolus (via guide catheter) versus intravenous abciximab in patients with STEMI, and it showed no difference in the composite primary end point (all-cause mortality, recurrent infarction, or new congestive heart failure at 90 days: 7.0 vs. 7.6%; odds ratio 0.91; 95% CI 0.64e1.28; P ¼ .58) [18].A meta-analysis pooling the data from several trials also demonstrated no benet from routine IC administration [19].Asof this writing, the evidence does not support routine use of IC abciximab in STEMI; however, using GP IIb/IIIa select receptor inhibitors as bailout therapy in the event of angiographic evidence of a large thrombus or slow or no reow, and other thrombotic complications, is reasonable, as suggested by the latest guidelines [20]. It is worth highlighting, though, that at this writing, this strategy has not been tested in a randomized trial, and evidence supporting IC and locally directed therapy (i.e., via ClearWay catheter) is still needed. In this context, Case 1 represents the useful utilization of guideline recommendations for treatment with a GP IIb/IIIa platelet receptor antagonist in ACS. The 66-year-old patient presented with intermittent chest pain since completing a triathlon 2 weeks earlier. The past medical history was unremarkable aside from a family history of ischemic heart disease. The admission ECG demonstrated inferior T-wave inversion and serum troponin T was elevated. Coronary arteriography identied a proximally occluded right coronary artery (RCA) with organized thrombus (Fig. 11.1A). The left-ventricular function was preserved, with the left-ventricular angiogram demonstrating a viable inferior wall. Accordingly, an attempt to open the RCA was indicated. Despite wire escalation the procedure was abandoned with TIMI 1 ow and a decision made to treat with the GP IIb/IIIa platelet receptor antagonist eptibatide for 24e48 h. Subsequent staged angiography demonstrated a patent RCA with TIMI 3 ow without any thrombus, but in the distal segment of the RCA a severe lesion was present (Fig. 11.1B). A 3.0 33-mm drug eluting stent (DES) was deployed with good result into the RCA proximal to the bifurcation of posterior descending artery (PDA) and posterior left ventricular branch of the right coronary artery (PLV).
Practical Perspectives on the Guidelines for Management of Coronary Thrombus Chapter | 11 165
https://t.me/med1917
FIGURE 11.1 Left panel: The right coronary artery is occluded mid vessel at presentation. Right panel: The same vessel imaged at cardiac cathe-
terisation 48 hours later after GpIIb/IIIa receptor antagonist infusion is now patent, as visualised prior to coronary stenting.
Local Thrombolysis
IC thrombolysis has demonstrated promising results in STEMI patients during primary PCI [21,22] as well as being an adjunct to PCI in cases of a large thrombus burden [23]. The DISSOLUTION trial (Delivery of Thrombolytic Therapy Prior to Thrombectomy in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary PCI) is the only randomized study that has investigated the effect of IC thrombolytic use prior to aspiration thrombectomy in patients with STEMI [24]. The study enrolled 102 patients comparing IC thrombolysis using urokinase at 200,000 U injected via a microcatheter prior to aspiration thrombectomy with IC normal saline in patients with large thrombus. The study found that patients treated with IC thrombolysis up front before aspiration thrombectomy compared with the control had an increased rate of TIMI 3 ow (90% vs. 66%; P ¼ .008), increased rate of STR >70% (82% vs. 55%, P ¼ .006), increased rate of MBG 2 or 3 (68% vs. 45%; P ¼ .028), and a lower rate of major adverse coronar y events (MACEs) at 6 months (6% vs. 21%; P ¼ .044); however, the last was driven by a reduction in rehospitalization for heart failure. Furthermore, up-front IC thrombolysis resulted in a larger volume of thrombus aspirate from subsequent manual thrombectomy. Additional larger randomized trials are needed to validate these ndings and test the safety and efcacy of IC thrombolytic agents as an adjunct to PCI. In fact, at this writing, the ongoing T-TIME study (Trial of Very Low-Dose and Low-Dose Adjunctive AlTeplase During Primary PCI) selects patients with an occluded artery and heavy thrombus burden at initial angiography and is a phase II double-blind, randomized, parallel group, placebo-controlled dose-ranging clinical trial evaluating two reduced doses of the thrombolytic alteplase delivered locally compared with placebo in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI. The study will investigate the question of whether a pharmacological strategy involving reduced-dose alteplase given early during the primary PCI will both p revent and treat distal microvascular thrombosis and micro­vessel occlusion and, subsequen tly, reduce infarct size.
Novel Therapies
More recently, novel oral anticoagulants termed DOACs (direct oral anticoagulants) are being used in place of warfarin or other coumarins for the prevention of thrombotic complications of atrial brillation and deep vein thrombosis (see Chapter 23 Consequently, a number of studies are now investigating the DOACs benets in the setting of ACS. Double­blind randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to investigate the benets of the direct thrombin inhibitors dabigatran and ximelagatran as well as the factor Xa inhibitors, apixaban, rivaroxaban, and darexaban, in patients with ACS are in the recruiting or reporting phase. Rivaroxaban, because of its potent factor Xa inhibition, reduces clotting and in an experimental study was shown to modify the brin network with thicker bers and larger pores, which resulted in greater permeation of ow through the clots [25]. Hence, it may facilitate resolution of thrombi. Isolated case reports have demonstrated that rivaroxaban can be used alongside dual-antiplatelet drugs for thrombus resolution, especially in ectatic aneurysmal vessels where stenting is problematic [26]. Randomized trial data are limited, although the GEMINI-ACS-1 [27], a double-blind, multicenter study that randomized patients with ACS to receive low-dose rivaroxaban with a P2Y12 inhibitor, showed a risk of clinically significant bleeding similar to that of aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor, whereas in the ATLAS ACS-2-TIMI-51 trial, STEMI patients following stenting were found to have reduced cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke with the addition of rivaroxaban to dual antiplatelet therapy, compared with placebo [28,29].
166 Cardiovascular Thrombus
https://t.me/med1917
MECHANICAL STRATEGIES
Thrombectomy Devices
Thrombectomy has emerged as a useful tool to reduce thrombus burden and thus distal embolization, further enhancing the benets of primary PCI. Various thrombectomy devices have been developed, allowing manual or mechanical removal of IC thrombi. All thrombectomy devices have shown benets compared with conventional primary PCI, when surrogate end points, such as angiographic ow assessment, LVEF assessment, infarct size reduction by perfusion imaging, enzymatic analysis, and STR, have been used [30e32]. As of this writing, evidence about hard end points from RCTs comparing manual and mechanical thrombectomy is limited and even conicting (Table 11.1). Recent large RCTs demonstrated no benet of routine thrombectomy. Indeed, in the TOTAL study, the risk of stroke within the rst 30 days in patients treated with manual aspiration thrombectomy was increased compared with no device. This could be a manifestation of systemic embolization from the thrombectomy catheter tip. For this reason, it is recommended to deeply engage the guiding catheter (cannulation) into the coronary ostium during the thrombus aspiration process to prevent embolization to the systemic and cerebral circulations.
As a result of these large RCTs, the current recommendations from the ESC and ACC/AH A/SCAI guidelines are that thrombectomy is not recommended as a routine procedure prior to PCI in patients with STEMI, but rather as a treatment option in highly selected patients with STEMI (e.g., large thrombus burden). Interestingly, a patient-level meta-analysis of the large RCTs demonstrated that in the subgroup with high thrombus burden (TIMI thrombus grade 3), thrombus aspiration was associated with fewer cardiovascular deaths (170 [2.5%] vs. 205 [3.1%]; HR 0.80; 95% CI 0.65e0.98; P ¼ .03), suggesting a benet and a role for continued use of thrombus removal [33]. In perspective, however, most studies include all comers, thus, there is no surprise that many thrombus aspiration studies do not demonstrate a signicant result.
Subgroup analysis of patients with high thrombus burden is practical and useful in guiding clinicians in daily practice. The timing of presentation and, therefore, the qualityof the thrombus following the onset of the MI is also a crucial point, which determines the outcome of aspiration and PCI. Most studies have not taken this concept into consideration and
TABLE 11.1 Manual Thrombectomy Trials and Outcomes
Clinical End Point
Trial Primary End Point
Phase II
Chao et al. [34] TIMI flow þ MBG NA () 0.014 þ ([) <0.001
Liistro et al. [35] ST resolution () 6-month MACE ([) 0.001
Buzotta et al. [30] MBG þ ST resolution () 30-day MACE ([) 0.020 þ ([) 0.034
De Luca et al. [31] MBG þ ST resolution () 6-month MACE ([) 0.030 þ ([) 0.020
Dudek et al. [36] () ST resolution () 6-month mortality ()
Sardella et al. [37] MBG þ ST resolution ([) 2-year cardiac death 0.001 and
Ciszewski et al. [38] Myocardial salvage () In-hospital mortality ([) 0.020
Silva-Orrego et al. [39] MBG þ ST resolution () In-hospital MACE ([) 0.030 þ ([) 0.020
Phase III
Stone et al. [17] () Infarct size NA () 0.51
Svilass et al. [12] MBG ([) 1-year cardiac 0.02 and all-cause
Chevalier et al. [40] MBG þ () ST resolution () 30-day MACE ([) 0.025 þ () 0.218
Frobert et al. [41] () 30-day mortality () 30-day mortalityþ() 30-day MACE () 0.63
Jolly S et al. [33] () Mortality and MACE at
180 days
(MACE and Mortality)
MACE 0.04
mortality 0.04
() Mortality and MACE at 180 days () 0.86
(Result) Primary End Point Significance
()
([) <0.001
MACE, major adverse coronary events; MBG, myocardial blush grade; TIMI, thrombolysis in myocardial infarction.
Practical Perspectives on the Guidelines for Management of Coronary Thrombus Chapter | 11 167
https://t.me/med1917
this might have inuenced the ndings of nonsuperiority of aspiration compared with PCI. As per the recent ESC updated guidelines, in cases of large residual thrombus burden after opening the vessel with a guidewire or a balloon, thrombus aspiration may be considered [20].
Case 2 illustrates the utilization of thrombectomy as indicated by the aforementioned guidelines. A 26-year-old man
who presented with chest pain and anterior STEMI had a history of nephrotic syndrome.
Coronary arteriography demonstrated a visible thrombus in the proximal LAD with reduced distal ow (Fig. 11.2A). Optical coherence tomography imaging conrmed the presence of thrombus with no associated coronary plaque rupture (Fig. 11.2B). IC treatment with the GP IIb/IIIa platelet receptor antagonist eptibatide was administered followed by thrombus aspiration using an Export aspiration catheter. A large burden of heavy white and red thrombus was aspirated and an improvement in distal ow was noted (Fig. 11.2C). Medical treatment with eptibatide for 48 h and anticoagulation with fondaparinux and prasugrel were given after the angiogram. Echocardiography revealed impaired left-ventricular function with apical thrombus. A repeat angiogram 2 weeks later demonstrated an unobstructed LAD with TIMI 3 ow (Fig. 11.2D).
Distal Protection Devices
Distal EPDs have been designed to minimize the distal embolization of debris during coronary intervention. They are predominantly used in saphenous vein graft (SVG) intervention, with old RCTs supporting their use in reducing distal
(A)
(C)
(B)
(D)
FIGURE 11.2 (A) Thrombus in proximal to middle left anterior descending artery. (B) Optical coherence tomography imaging demonstrating
intracoronary thrombus. (C) Thrombus removed using thrombectomy catheter. (D) Angiogram after thrombus aspiration.
168 Cardiovascular Thrombus
https://t.me/med1917
embolization, no reow, and periprocedural MI [42,43]. Examples of EPDs include proximal occlusion aspiration device and distal lter, which uses a distal basket to trap the debris and maintain distal perfusion. Evidence for the use of EPDs in native coronary arteries is limited to studies in STEMI, which fail to demonstrate any benecial effect of routine embolic protection on myocardial reperfusion or clinical outcomes. Thus, the aforementioned European and American guidelines for revascularization recommend the use of EPDs for PCI of SVG lesions if technically feasible (ESC class IB and AHA/ ACC class 1B). Notably, despite the recommendations of these guidelines, the actual use of protection devices in real-word clinical practice is surprisingly low. In one 2015 trial, the EPDs were used in only 21% of contemporary SVG PCIs [44]. The limited use of EPDs could be explained by thei r small size, the lack of support for utilization based on studies that failed to demonstrate an advantage of use, and the new dual antiplatelet therapy and statins that may have an impact on the safety and durability of SVG PCI. The clinical benet of EPDs in carotid artery stenting is more established and rec­ommended in international guidelines. A 2017 study reported by Knappich and colleagues showed signicant clinical benet of lower stroke and death rates after carotid stenting [45]. Case 3 describes the application of a distal protection device as recommended by the guidelines: a 72-year-old woman presented with chest pain and 1 month of shortness of breath. ECG demon strated T-wave inversion in the lateral leads and the serum troponin T level was elevated. The medical history included coronary artery bypass surgery 15 years earlier (grafts included left internal mammary artery (LIMA) to LAD, SVG to RCA, SVG to obtuse marginal branch of the circumex artery (OM)1, and SVG to OM2). Coronary arteriography disclosed occluded native vessels, patent LIMA to LAD, severe lesi on in the SVG to the RCA, and severe lesion with thrombus in the SVG to OM, the last considered the acute culprit lesion (Fig. 11.3A). PCI of this vessel
(A)
(C)
(B)
(D)
FIGURE 11.3 (A) SVG to OM lesion and thrombus. (B) SVG to OM Spider protection device deployment. (C) SVG to OM after stent deployed.
(D) SVG to OM stent 7 days poststenting. SVG, saphenous vein graft; OM, Obtuse marginal branch of the circumex artery.
Practical Perspectives on the Guidelines for Management of Coronary Thrombus Chapter | 11 169
https://t.me/med1917
included two boluses of IC eptibatide followed by Spider protection device deployment and thrombus aspiration by Export catheter with no thrombus seen in the aspirate (Fig. 11.3B). A direct DES was deployed in the SVG with resultant TIMI 3 ow (Fig. 11.3C). The Spider protection device s basket was taken out with no debris embolized distally. Selective angiogram 7 days later during stenting of the SVG RCA lesion demonstrated good results in the stented SVG OM (Fig. 11.3D).
Excimer Laser
Utilization of the US FDA-approved excimer l aser is a potentially useful strategy in large thrombus burden as it can dissipate thrombus, can vaporize procoagulant mediators [46,47], and may suppress platelet aggregation [50]. Laser therapy also has a debulking effect on atherosclerotic plaques and may reduce distal embolization and microvascular dysfunction and facilitate stent deployment [49,50]. Despite the appeal of laser therapy for thrombus removal, only limited clinical data are available supporting its use. The largest study at this writing, the multicenter registry Cohort of Acute Revascularization of Myocardial Infarction with Excimer Laser (CARMEL), enrolled 151 acute MI (AMI) patients, 65% of whom had large thrombus burden in the culprit artery [48] . The use of excimer laser resulted in signicantly improved TIMI ow grade (1.2e2.8), with an associated reduction in angiographic stenosis (83%e52%). There was a low rate (8.6%) of MACEs [51]. The maximal effect was observed in arteries with a large angiographic thrombus burden. Only one RCT has been performed, in a small number of AMI patients, demonstrating the safety and feasibility of laser use with outcomes comparable to those of standard treatment; however, further study is needed [52].
Stent Choice for Thrombotic Conditions
This topic is covered thoroughly in Chapter 19 in this book.
Overall, there has been exploration of the yield of a bare metal stent platform covered with a polyethylene terephthalate mesh (MGuard stent) that aims to trap thrombus and hence prevent distal embolization [53]. There has been one multi­center randomized study (n ¼ 433) comparing the efcacy of the MGuard stent with that of conventional stents (either bare metal stent (BMS) or DES) in STEMI. The primary outcome of complete STR postprocedure was signicantly better in the patients randomized to the MGuard stenting arm compared with conventional stenting (57.8% vs. 44.7%, absolute dif­ference 13.2%; 95% CI 3.1%e23.3%; P ¼ .008) [54]. Subgroup analyses showed the highest differences favoring the MGuard stent in cases with large thrombus burden; however, the incidence of repeat revascularization was higher than in the control group (8.6% vs. 0.9%, P ¼ .0003). Limitations of the MGuard are coverage of side branches with mesh and the bulkiness of the device. Further evaluation of the MGuard stent was provided in the MASTER II trial, an international, multicenter, randomized trial designed to enroll 1114 patients to show the superiority of the MGuard stent vs. conventional PCI in clinical events such as death or MI. However, because of a higher than expected frequency of stent dislodgment, the study was voluntarily suspended in April 2014 after enrollment of 310 patients (155 pati ents per group). Analysis of this limited size cohort showed no benet of the MGuard stent in any of the end points (STR 56.9% vs. 59.3% for the control group, P ¼ .68; mortality 0.6% vs. 1.9%, respectively, P ¼ .62). Similarly, a pooled analysis of the MASTER I and II trials (n ¼ 743) failed to show better myocardial reperfusion (STR 57.5% for the MGuard vs. 50.7% for the control group, P ¼ .07), although mortality at 30 days was lower (0.3% vs. 1.9%, P ¼ .03) [55]. Thus, data from randomized trials suggest that the use of the MGuard stent may reduce distal embolization and may improve survival at 30 days compared with other commercially available coronary stents, although ultimately, larger clinical outcome trials are needed to determine if this strategy of trapping the thrombus with a mesh-covered stent improves clinical outcomes and whether it would be optimal to have a drug-eluting version to avoid restenosis.
As for self-expanding stents, vessels with a large thrombus burden carry the risk of distal embolization when stenting with a balloon-expandable stent [56]. The STENTYS stent is a nitinol self-expanding stent made for atraumatic deployment. Gentle deployment of the STENTYS stent from distal to proximal may capture loose thrombus and reduce the likelihood of the thrombus dislodging and traveling distally during stent deployment [55]. The evidence on self-apposing stents originates from the APPOSITION program [55e58]. In the most recent randomized APPOSITION IV study involving 152 STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI, the self-apposing, sirolimus-eluting STENTYS stent was equivalent to a conventional drug-eluting balloon-expandable stent with respect to late stent strut apposition and coverage at 9 months; however, stent strut apposition and coverage at 4 months were signicantly better in the STENTYS group
[58]. Use of this stent in specic high thrombus lesions has not been directly studied.
170 Cardiovascular Thrombus
https://t.me/med1917
The Deferred Stenting Management Strategy
Deferring stenting in primary PCI has been investigated as an option to reduce distal embolization of thrombotic material and preserve microcirculatory function, especially in the presence of a high thrombus burden. Two small studies found conicting results regarding the effect of deferred stenting [59,60]. In the larger (1215 STEMI patients) DANAMI 3-DEFER (Danish Third Study of Optimal Acute Treatment of Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial InfarctioneDeferred vs. conventional stent implantation in patients with STEMI) trial [61], the deferred stenting (48 h post-index procedure) had no effect on the primary clinical outcome (composite of all-cause mortality, nonfatal MI, or ischemia-driven revascularization of the infarct-related artery lesions), and routine deferred stenting was associated with a higher need for target-vessel revascularization. Based on these ndings, the established guidelines do not recommend the routine use of deferred stenting [20]. However, a certain limitation of these guidelines rests with the interpretation of routine use.Select cases of high thrombus burden may, in fact, benet from this specic stent strategy. Overall, the burden of high thrombus volume on interventions remains a major technical challenge [62] and the interventionalist carries the responsibility for nding a patient-specic therapeutic solution [63]. This frequently challenges the operator to introduce a nonconventional thrombus removal strategy [64]. It raises the notion that potentially, deferred stenting management may be considered a valid option alongside adjunctive pharmacology for selected patients, despite the current negative recommendation from the recognized guidelines.
APPROACHES IN EXCEPTION TO THE CURRENT GUIDELINES
In cases of coronary arteries with massive thrombus burden, it is important to extract the thrombus completely to restore coronary ow and prevent no reow and continued aggressive thrombus accumulation [65]. A major limitation of current standard aspiration thrombectomy is the small inner cross-sectional area whereby the suction power is often insufcient to evacuate occlusive thrombotic material [66]. Furthermore, a large thrombus may become entrapped at the tip of the aspiration device and then inadvertently released during device withdrawal. This can cause embolic stroke or occlusion of another artery, which may explain the reported signal for increased risk of stroke with the use of aspiration catheters. An alternative thrombus management solution has been introduced, involving a mother/daughtercatheter technique for improved aspiration. Herein a 6-Fr catheter is inserted into an 8-Fr catheter, with the mothercatheter shortened to enable the daughtercatheter to reach the distal segment of the target artery [67e69]. Although shown as an efcient technique, serious complications can occur, including coronary dissection, distal embolization, and systemic embolization. Accordingly, this technique should be considered only in select cases in which the coronary artery is large enough to accommodate the catheters and the operator experienced in preventing embolization.
Importantly, another alternative revascularization approach should be taken into consideration. At times, in select cases, it appears that the best management option is to simply leave the thrombus burden untouched. For example, in symp­tomatic, ischemic patients post-coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABGS) who exhibit early acute vein graft failure, rather than dealing with the thrombotic graft, native vessel intervention is preferred wherever possible, even if it involves revascularization of an existing chronic total occlusion (CTO) lesion. This approach reduces the considerable risk of intragraft intervention, such as distal embolization, no reow, and MI. Thus, although CTO revascularization in this clinical setting is challenging, a subset of favorable CTO features for procedural success can be rapidly determined using contralateral injections for distal visualization of the CTO-containing vessel. To summarize, this approach of entirely abandoning the thrombuscan result in avoiding the potential pitfalls and complications of treating high thrombus burden in a venous bypass graft. Thus, interventionists performing primary PCI should be familiar with this approach. Case 4 demonstrates the application of this unique strategy in a symptomatic patient (Fig. 11.4).
EXPERT OPINION
The presence of thrombus in patients presenting with ACS constitutes a common and adverse nding. There is conicting evidence as to the ideal treatment. In the presence of a large thrombus burden, we would recommend crossing the lesion with a dedicated PCI wire and considering administration of IC GP IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist, accompanied by aspiration thrombectomy. This should be performed only with deep guide catheter engagement to decrease the risk of systemic thromboembolism. If despite this pretreatment and balloon angioplasty the persistence of a large thrombus burden remains evident, then IC thrombolysis or deferred stenting following prolonged infusions of GP IIb/IIIa (24e48 h) receptor antagonist should be considered. Application of mechanical, powe r-based thrombus extraction or vaporization technology is an option in select cases with signicant thrombus burden, especially when resistant thrombus is encountered.