Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3720_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана
.pdf
160 Cardiovascular Thrombus
https://t.me/med1917
[61] Burke AP, Farb A, Malcom GT, Liang YH, Smialek J, Virmani R. Coronary risk factors and plaque morphology in men with coronary disease who
died suddenly. N Engl J Med 1997;336(18):1276e82.
[62] Motoyama S, Sarai M, Harigaya H, Anno H, Inoue K, Hara T, et al. Computed tomographic angiography characteristics of atherosclerotic plaques
subsequently resulting in acute coronary syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54(1):49e57.
[63] Motoyama S, Ito H, Sarai M, Kondo T, Kawai H, Nagahara Y, et al. Plaque characterization by coronary computed tomography angiography and
the likelihood of acute coronary events in mid-term follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015;66(4):337e46.
[64] Falk E. Why do plaques rupture? Circulation 1992;86(6 Suppl):III30e42.
[65] Zhao Z, Witzenbichler B, Mintz GS, Jaster M, Choi SY, Wu X, et al. Dynamic nature of nonculprit coronary artery lesion morphology in STEMI: a
serial IVUS analysis from the HORIZONS-AMI trial. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;6(1):86e95.
[66] Nair A, Margolis MP, Kuban BD, Vince DG. Automated coronary plaque characterisation with intravascular ultrasound backscatter: ex vivo
validation. EuroIntervention 2007;3(1):113e20.
[67] Haro LH, Decker WW, Boie ET, Wright RS. Initial approach to the patient who has chest pain. Cardiol Clin 2006;24(1). 1e17, v.
[68] Antman EM, Cohen M, Bernink PJ, McCabe CH, Horacek T, Papuchis G, et al. The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non-ST elevation MI: a
method for prognostication and therapeutic decision making. J Am Med Assoc 2000;284(7):835e42.
[69] Granger CB, Goldberg RJ, Dabbous O, Pieper KS, Eagle KA, Cannon CP, et al. Predictors of hospital mortality in the global registry of acute
coronary events. Arch Intern Med 2003;163(19):2345e53.
[70] Beltrame JF. Assessing patients with myocardial infarction and nonobstructed coronary arteries (MINOCA). J Intern Med 2013;273(2):182e5.
[71] Rouan GW, Lee TH, Cook EF, Brand DA, Weisberg MC, Goldman L. Clinical characteristics and outcome of acute myocardial infarction in patients
with initially normal or nonspecific electrocardiograms (a report from the Multicenter Chest Pain Study). Am J Cardiol 1989;64(18):1087e92.
[72] Maznyczka A, Kaier T, Marber M. Troponins and other biomarkers in the early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. Postgrad Med
2015;91(1076):322e30.
[73] Apple FS, Pearce LA, Smith SW, Kaczmarek JM, Murakami MM. Role of monitoring changes in sensitive cardiac troponin I assay results for early
diagnosis of myocardial infarction and prediction of risk of adverse events. Clin Chem 2009;55(5):930e7.
[74] Garcia-Garcia HM, Jang IK, Serruys PW, Kovacic JC, Narula J, Fayad ZA. Imaging plaques to predict and better manage patients with acute
coronary events. Circ Res 2014;114(12):1904e17.
[75] Foy AJ, Liu G, Davidson Jr WR, Sciamanna C, Leslie DL. Comparative effectiveness of diagnostic testing strategies in emergency department
patients with chest pain: an analysis of downstream testing, interventions, and outcomes. J Am Med Assoc Intern Med 2015;175(3):428e36.
[76] Saeian K, Rhyne TL, Sagar KB. Ultrasonic tissue characterization for diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in the coronary care unit. Am J
Cardiol 1994;74(12):1211e5.
[77] Garg P, Underwood SR, Senior R, Greenwood JP, Plein S. Noninvasive cardiac imaging in suspected acute coronary syndrome. Nat Rev Cardiol
2016;13(5):266e75.
[78] Kontos MC, Arrowood JA, Jesse RL, Ornato JP, Paulsen WH, Tatum JL, et al. Comparison between 2-dimensional echocardiography and
myocardial perfusion imaging in the emergency department in patients with possible myocardial ischemia. Am Heart J 1998;136(4 Pt 1):724e33.
[79] Litt HI, Gatsonis C, Snyder B, Singh H, Miller CD, Entrikin DW, et al. CT angiography for safe discharge of patients with possible acute coronary
syndromes. N Engl J Med 2012;366(15):1393e403.
[80] Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, Casey Jr DE, Ganiats TG, Holmes Jr DR, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of
patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force
on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2014;130(25):e344e426.
[81] Cowley MJ, DiSciascio G, Rehr RB, Vetrovec GW. Angiographic observations and clinical relevance of coronary thrombus in unstable angina
pectoris. Am J Cardiol 1989;63(10):108Ee13E.
[82] Alpert DH, Hirsh PD, Cowley MJ, Vetrovec GW. Angiographic demonstration of plaque fissure associated with acute coronary occlusion. Am
Heart J 1989;117(1):185e6.
[83] Vetrovec GW, Cowley MJ, Overton H, Richardson DW. Intracoronary thrombus in syndromes of unstable myocardial ischemia. Am Heart J
1981;102(6 Pt 2):1202e8.
[84] Kerensky RA, Wade M, Deedwania P, Boden WE, Pepine CJ. Veterans Affairs Non QWISi-HTI. Revisiting the culprit lesion in non-Q-wave
myocardial infarction. Results from the VANQWISH trial angiographic core laboratory. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39(9):1456e63.
[85] Ambrose JA, Winters SL, Stern A, Eng A, Teichholz LE, Gorlin R, et al. Angiographic morphology and the pathogenesis of unstable angina
pectoris. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985;5(3):609e
[86] Layland J, Carrick D, McEntegart M, Ahmed N, Payne A, McClure J, et al. Vasodilatory capacity of the coronary microcirculation is preserved in
selected patients with non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2013;6(3):231e6.
[87] Layland J, Oldroyd KG, Curzen N, Sood A, Balachandran K, Das R, et al. Fractional flow reserve vs. angiography in guiding management to
optimize outcomes in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the British Heart Foundation FAMOUS-NSTEMI randomized trial. Eur
Heart J 2015;36(2):100e11.
[88] Sels JW, Tonino PA, Siebert U, Fearon WF, Van’t Veer M, De Bruyne B, et al. Fractional flow reserve in unstable angina and non-ST-segment
elevation myocardial infarction experience from the FAME (Fractional flow reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study. JACC
Cardiovasc Interv 2011;4(11):1183e9.
[89] Barbato E, Toth GG, Johnson NP, Pijls NH, Fearon WF, Tonino PA, et al. A prospective natural history study of coronary atherosclerosis using
fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;68(21):2247e55.
16.

Acute Coronary Syndrome: Thrombotic Lesions in Patients With Unstable Angina Chapter | 10 161
https://t.me/med1917
[90] Nair A, Kuban BD, Tuzcu EM, Schoenhagen P, Nissen SE, Vince DG. Coronary plaque classification with intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency
data analysis. Circulation 2002;106(17):2200e6.
[91] Gyongyosi M, Yang P, Hassan A, Weidinger F, Domanovits H, Laggner A, et al. Arterial remodelling of native human coronary arteries in patients
with unstable angina pectoris: a prospective intravascular ultrasound study. Heart 1999;82(1):68e74.
[92] Gyongyosi M, Yang P, Hassan A, Domanovits H, Laggner A, Weidinger F, et al. Intravascular ultrasound predictors of major adverse cardiac
events in patients with unstable angina. Clin Cardiol 2000;23(7):507e15.
[93] Batty JA, Subba S, Luke P, Gigi LW, Sinclair H, Kunadian V. Intracoronary imaging in the detection of vulnerable plaques. Curr Cardiol Rep
2016;18(3):28.
[94] Sinclair H, Bourantas C, Bagnall A, Mintz GS, Kunadian V. OCT for the identification of vulnerable plaque in acute coronary syndrome. JACC
Cardiovasc Imaging 2015;8(2):198e209.
[95] Tanaka A, Imanishi T, Kitabata H, Kubo T, Takarada S, Tanimoto T, et al. Morphology of exertion-triggered plaque rupture in patients with acute
coronary syndrome: an optical coherence tomography study. Circulation 2008;118(23):2368e73.
[96] Mizuno K, Satomura K, Miyamoto A, Arakawa K, Shibuya T, Arai T, et al. Angioscopic evaluation of coronary-artery thrombi in acute coronary
syndromes. N Engl J Med 1992;326(5):287e91.
[97] Hiruta N, Uchida Y, Maezawa Y, Shimoyama E, Uchida Y. Molecular imaging of apolipoprotein B-100 in human coronary plaques by color
fluorescent angioscopy and microscopy. Int Heart J 2013;54(2):68e74.
[98] Roffi M, Patrono C, Collet JP, Mueller C, Valgimigli M, Andreotti F, et al. 2015 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes
in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: Task Force for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting
without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2016;37(3):267e315.
[99] Oler A, Whooley MA, Oler J, Grady D. Adding heparin to aspirin reduces the incidence of myocardial infarction and death in patients with unstable
angina. A meta-analysis. J Am Med Assoc 1996;276(10):811e5.
[100] Petersen JL, Mahaffey KW, Hasselblad V, Antman EM, Cohen M, Goodman SG, et al. Efficacy and bleeding complications among patients
randomized to enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin for antithrombin therapy in non-ST-Segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: a systematic
overview. J Am Med Assoc 2004;292(1):89e96.
[101] Stone GW, McLaurin BT, Cox DA, Bertrand ME, Lincoff AM, Moses JW, et al. Bivalirudin for patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J
Med 2006;355(21):2203e16.
[102] Effects of tissue plasminogen activator and a comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in unstable angina and non-Q-wave
myocardial infarction. Results of the TIMI IIIB Trial. Thrombolysis in Myocardial Ischemia. Circulation 1994;89(4):1545e56.
[103] Antithrombotic Trialists C, Baigent C, Blackwell L, Collins R, Emberson J, Godwin J, et al. Aspirin in the primary and secondary prevention of
vascular disease: collaborative meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomised trials. Lancet 2009;373(9678):1849e60.
[104] Giugliano RP, White JA, Bode C, Armstrong PW, Montalescot G, Lewis BS, et al. Early versus delayed, provisional eptifibatide in acute coronary
syndromes. N Engl J Med 2009;360(21):2176e90.
[105] Valgimigli M, Biondi-Zoccai G, Tebaldi M, van’t Hof AW, Campo G, Hamm C, et al. Tirofiban as adjunctive therapy for acute coronary
syndromes and percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Eur Heart J 2010;31(1):35e49.
[106] Schwartz GG, Olsson AG, Ezekowitz MD, Ganz P, Oliver MF, Waters D, et al. Effects of atorvastatin on early recurrent ischemic events in acute
coronary syndromes: the MIRACL study: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Assoc 2001;285(13):1711e8.
[107] Fanning JP, Nyong J, Scott IA, Aroney CN, Walters DL. Routine invasive strategies versus selective invasive strategies for unstable angina and
non-ST elevation myocardial infarction in the stent era. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;(5):CD004815.
[108] Fox KA, Clayton TC, Damman P, Pocock SJ, de Winter RJ, Tijssen JG, et al. Long-term outcome of a routine versus selective invasive strategy in
patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome a meta-analysis of individual patient data. J Am Coll Cardiol
2010;55(22):2435e45.
[109] Sianos G, Morel MA, Kappetein AP, Morice MC, Colombo A, Dawkins K, et al. The SYNTAX Score: an angiographic tool grading the
complexity of coronary artery disease. EuroIntervention 2005;1(2):219e27.
[110] De Ferrari GM, Fox KA, White JA, Giugliano RP, Tricoci P, Reynolds HR, et al. Outcomes among non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary
syndromes patients with no angiographically obstructive coronary artery disease: observations from 37,101 patients. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc
Care 2014;3(1):37e45.
[111] Writing Committee M, Thomas RJ, King M, Lui K, Oldridge N, Pina IL, et al. AACVPR/ACCF/AHA 2010 update: performance measures on
cardiac rehabilitation for referral to cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention services: a report of the American Association of Cardiovascular
and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on performance
measures (Writing Committee to develop clinical performance measures for cardiac rehabilitation). Circulation 2010;122(13):1342e50.
[112] Holmes Jr DR, Dehmer GJ, Kaul S, Leifer D, O’Gara PT, Stein CM. ACCF/AHA clopidogrel clinical alert: approaches to the FDA “boxed
warning”: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on clinical expert consensus documents and the American Heart
Association endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol
2010;56(4):321e41.
[113] Price MJ, Berger PB, Teirstein PS, Tanguay JF, Angiolillo DJ, Spriggs D, et al. Standard- vs high-dose clopidogrel based on platelet function
testing after percutaneous coronary intervention: the GRAVITAS randomized trial. J Am Med Assoc 2011;305(11):1097e105.

Chapter 11
https://t.me/med1917
Practical Perspectives on the Guidelines
for Management of Coronary Thrombus
Oliver P. Guttmann, Amir Orlev, Krishnaraj S. Rathod, Daniel A. Jones and Elliot J. Smith
Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
INTRODUCTION
Thrombus is a distinctive histopathological feature of patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and
constitutes an adverse finding that significantly affects interventional management. Although angiography seems to underestimate the presence of thrombi, they are very frequently detected in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)
patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and tend to be larger than in non-ST-elevation ACS.
Sianos et al. [1] reported that up to 91.6% of STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI showed intracoronary (IC)
thrombosis at angiography. Thrombus may also complicate other complex anatomic conditions associated with an altered
flow, such as ectatic or aneurysmal coronary arteries, degenerate venous grafts, or previous coronary stents. A large
thrombus burden has been associated with PCI failure in patients with STEMI in previous retrospective, nonrandomized
studies [1e3]. In the largest such study [3], among 900 patients with STEMI treated with primary or rescue PCI, the
presence of large thrombus (30% of cases) was strongly associated with higher rates of impaired flow measured by TIMI
(thrombolysis in myocardial infarction) flow grade <3 and final myocardial blush grade (MBG) grade 0/1, resulting in
increased mortality at 2 years (adjusted hazard ratio 1.66 [1.04, 2.68], P ¼ .04). This chapter presents the authors’ perspectives on thrombus management as reflected in the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the American Heart
Association/American College of Cardiology (AHA/ACC) guidelines, depicts exemplary cases, and describes select
exceptions to these guidelines.
PROGNOSTIC SIGNIFICANCE OF THROMBUS
The grading and classification of coronary thrombi [4,5] are important tools for management decisions and therapy
assessment in coronary interventions. A detailed description of these concepts is presented in Chapter 12 in this book.
The presence of thrombus in the coronary circulation is predictive of poor prognosis and a well-known risk factor for
long-term adverse cardiovascular events, including distal embolization, stent thrombosis, and inhibition of myocardial
perfusion [1,3,6e11]. The risk appears to be proportional to the size and composition of the thrombus. Studies indicate that
distal embolization is very common, with rates of up to 18%. This leads to higher incidence of slow/no-reflow rates and,
therefore, lower procedural success rates. Patients with distal embolization during primary PCI also present with lower leftventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), increased troponin, and Creatine Kinase (CK) elevation and have an increased inhospital and late mortality rates [11e14]. In addition to size and thrombus composition, TIMI flow grade before PCI,
target lesion length, and vessel diameter are predictors of distal embolization [6,15]. Thrombi with a high erythrocyte
component have been shown to be associated with distal embolization [7,16]. Hence, predicting thrombus burden and its
composition before primary PCI may affect consequent decisions concerning adjunctive antithrombotic drugs and,
potentially, adding aspiration. This process is crucial for both angiographic and clinical outcomes through improvement of
the epicardial flow and myocardial perfusion.
Cardiovascular Thrombus. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812615-8.00011-9
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
163

164 Cardiovascular Thrombus
https://t.me/med1917
MANAGEMENT OF HIGH THROMBUS BURDEN
The removal of thrombus before any other step of intervention may dramatically decrease the risk of no flow, and has the
potential for survival improvement; however, the optimal approach for thrombus-containing lesions is still evolving.
Current management guidelines offer thrombus removal with standard mechanical aspiration catheters combined with
pharmacotherapy; however, additional devices and techniques are available as well. These include proximal or distal antiembolic protection devices (EPDs) and higher technology devices with power-based mechanical energy allowing fragmentation and removal of thrombus. This concept is delineated in Chapter 12 in this book.
Overall, our perspective is that studies of thrombectomy before stenting have produce d conflicting results and there
is no guideline-based consensus as t o their routine use in lesions containing thrombus. Other direct thrombus management options include covered and self-expandable stents or deferred stenting after prolonged infusion of antithrombotic drugs.
PHARMACOLOGICAL STRATEGIES FOR INTRACORONARY THROMBUS
This topic is detailed in Chapter 12 in this book. In brief, the pharmacotherapy available in the cardiac catheterization suite
includes glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors, the direct thrombin inhibitor bivalirudin, and thrombolytic agents.
Postprocedural options include antiplatelet therapy, prolonged use of GP IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors, low-molecular-weight
heparin, direct thrombin inhibitors, and factor Xa inhibitors.
Most of the studies that support the use of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors in ACS were performed before the routine use of
P2Y12 inhibitors and other anticoagulants such as fondaparinux. There have been studies that have investigated their use in
patients undergoing PCI for STEMI and have looked specifically at the timing of use and route of administration in
addition to the dual antiplatelet therapy. Localized directed IC administration of abciximab in the infarct-related artery has
attracted some research interest. The theoretical advantage of this approach is provision of a higher concentration of active
drug at the site of thrombus, given that abciximab has a short plasma half-life. The INFUSE-AMI trial was a randomized
2 2 factorial single-blinded trial of STEMI patients with left an terior descending artery (LAD) occlusion undergoing
PCI. In this study, all patients received dual antiplatelet therapy with patients randomized to a single 0.25 mg/kg IC bolus
of abciximab with bivalirudin versus bivalirudin alone, as well as manual aspiration thrombectomy versus PCI alone. The
primary end point was 30-day infarct size, which was assessed with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. The study found
that there was a 2.3% reduction in the primary end point with the use of IC abciximab (15.1% vs. 17.9%; P ¼ .03).
However, early markers of microcirculatory reperfusion (MBG and ST-segment resoluti on [STR]) wer e not improved.
Furthermore, the improvement in infarct size at 30 days was modest and much less than what was considered clinically
relevant at the start of the study [17].
The significantly larger (n ¼ 2065) trial termed AIDA STEMI (Abciximab Intracoronary vs. Intravenous Drug
Application in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) compared IC bolus (via guide catheter) versus intravenous abciximab
in patients with STEMI, and it showed no difference in the composite primary end point (all-cause mortality, recurrent
infarction, or new congestive heart failure at 90 days: 7.0 vs. 7.6%; odds ratio 0.91; 95% CI 0.64e1.28; P ¼ .58) [18].A
meta-analysis pooling the data from several trials also demonstrated no benefit from routine IC administration [19].Asof
this writing, the evidence does not support routine use of IC abciximab in STEMI; however, using GP IIb/IIIa select
receptor inhibitors as bailout therapy in the event of angiographic evidence of a large thrombus or slow or no reflow, and
other thrombotic complications, is reasonable, as suggested by the latest guidelines [20]. It is worth highlighting, though,
that at this writing, this strategy has not been tested in a randomized trial, and evidence supporting IC and locally directed
therapy (i.e., via ClearWay catheter) is still needed. In this context, Case 1 represents the useful utilization of guideline
recommendations for treatment with a GP IIb/IIIa platelet receptor antagonist in ACS. The 66-year-old patient presented
with intermittent chest pain since completing a triathlon 2 weeks earlier. The past medical history was unremarkable aside
from a family history of ischemic heart disease. The admission ECG demonstrated inferior T-wave inversion and serum
troponin T was elevated. Coronary arteriography identified a proximally occluded right coronary artery (RCA) with
organized thrombus (Fig. 11.1A). The left-ventricular function was preserved, with the left-ventricular angiogram
demonstrating a viable inferior wall. Accordingly, an attempt to open the RCA was indicated. Despite wire escalation the
procedure was abandoned with TIMI 1 flow and a decision made to treat with the GP IIb/IIIa platelet receptor antagonist
eptifibatide for 24e48 h. Subsequent staged angiography demonstrated a patent RCA with TIMI 3 flow without any
thrombus, but in the distal segment of the RCA a severe lesion was present (Fig. 11.1B). A 3.0 33-mm drug eluting stent
(DES) was deployed with good result into the RCA proximal to the bifurcation of posterior descending artery (PDA) and
posterior left ventricular branch of the right coronary artery (PLV).

Practical Perspectives on the Guidelines for Management of Coronary Thrombus Chapter | 11 165
https://t.me/med1917
FIGURE 11.1 Left panel: The right coronary artery is occluded mid vessel at presentation. Right panel: The same vessel imaged at cardiac cathe-
terisation 48 hours later after GpIIb/IIIa receptor antagonist infusion is now patent, as visualised prior to coronary stenting.
Local Thrombolysis
IC thrombolysis has demonstrated promising results in STEMI patients during primary PCI [21,22] as well as being an
adjunct to PCI in cases of a large thrombus burden [23]. The DISSOLUTION trial (Delivery of Thrombolytic Therapy
Prior to Thrombectomy in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary PCI) is the only
randomized study that has investigated the effect of IC thrombolytic use prior to aspiration thrombectomy in patients with
STEMI [24]. The study enrolled 102 patients comparing IC thrombolysis using urokinase at 200,000 U injected via a
microcatheter prior to aspiration thrombectomy with IC normal saline in patients with large thrombus. The study found that
patients treated with IC thrombolysis up front before aspiration thrombectomy compared with the control had an increased
rate of TIMI 3 flow (90% vs. 66%; P ¼ .008), increased rate of STR >70% (82% vs. 55%, P ¼ .006), increased rate of
MBG 2 or 3 (68% vs. 45%; P ¼ .028), and a lower rate of major adverse coronar y events (MACEs) at 6 months (6% vs.
21%; P ¼ .044); however, the last was driven by a reduction in rehospitalization for heart failure. Furthermore, up-front IC
thrombolysis resulted in a larger volume of thrombus aspirate from subsequent manual thrombectomy. Additional larger
randomized trials are needed to validate these findings and test the safety and efficacy of IC thrombolytic agents as an
adjunct to PCI. In fact, at this writing, the ongoing T-TIME study (Trial of Very Low-Dose and Low-Dose Adjunctive
AlTeplase During Primary PCI) selects patients with an occluded artery and heavy thrombus burden at initial angiography
and is a phase II double-blind, randomized, parallel group, placebo-controlled dose-ranging clinical trial evaluating two
reduced doses of the thrombolytic alteplase delivered locally compared with placebo in STEMI patients undergoing
primary PCI. The study will investigate the question of whether a pharmacological strategy involving reduced-dose
alteplase given early during the primary PCI will both p revent and treat distal microvascular thrombosis and microvessel occlusion and, subsequen tly, reduce infarct size.
Novel Therapies
More recently, novel oral anticoagulants termed DOACs (direct oral anticoagulants) are being used in place of warfarin
or other coumarins for the prevention of thrombotic complications of atrial fibrillation and deep vein thrombosis (see
Chapter 23 Consequently, a number of studies are now investigating the DOACs benefits in the setting of ACS. Doubleblind randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to investigate the benefits of the direct thrombin inhibitors dabigatran and
ximelagatran as well as the factor Xa inhibitors, apixaban, rivaroxaban, and darexaban, in patients with ACS are in the
recruiting or reporting phase. Rivaroxaban, because of its potent factor Xa inhibition, reduces clotting and in an experimental
study was shown to modify the fibrin network with thicker fibers and larger pores, which resulted in greater permeation of
flow through the clots [25]. Hence, it may facilitate resolution of thrombi. Isolated case reports have demonstrated that
rivaroxaban can be used alongside dual-antiplatelet drugs for thrombus resolution, especially in ectatic aneurysmal vessels
where stenting is problematic [26]. Randomized trial data are limited, although the GEMINI-ACS-1 [27], a double-blind,
multicenter study that randomized patients with ACS to receive low-dose rivaroxaban with a P2Y12 inhibitor, showed a risk
of clinically significant bleeding similar to that of aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor, whereas in the ATLAS ACS-2-TIMI-51
trial, STEMI patients following stenting were found to have reduced cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), or
stroke with the addition of rivaroxaban to dual antiplatelet therapy, compared with placebo [28,29].

166 Cardiovascular Thrombus
https://t.me/med1917
MECHANICAL STRATEGIES
Thrombectomy Devices
Thrombectomy has emerged as a useful tool to reduce thrombus burden and thus distal embolization, further enhancing the
benefits of primary PCI. Various thrombectomy devices have been developed, allowing manual or mechanical removal of
IC thrombi. All thrombectomy devices have shown benefits compared with conventional primary PCI, when surrogate end
points, such as angiographic flow assessment, LVEF assessment, infarct size reduction by perfusion imaging, enzymatic
analysis, and STR, have been used [30e32]. As of this writing, evidence about hard end points from RCTs comparing
manual and mechanical thrombectomy is limited and even conflicting (Table 11.1). Recent large RCTs demonstrated no
benefit of routine thrombectomy. Indeed, in the TOTAL study, the risk of stroke within the first 30 days in patients treated
with manual aspiration thrombectomy was increased compared with no device. This could be a manifestation of systemic
embolization from the thrombectomy catheter tip. For this reason, it is recommended to deeply engage the guiding catheter
(cannulation) into the coronary ostium during the thrombus aspiration process to prevent embolization to the systemic and
cerebral circulations.
As a result of these large RCTs, the current recommendations from the ESC and ACC/AH A/SCAI guidelines are that
thrombectomy is not recommended as a routine procedure prior to PCI in patients with STEMI, but rather as a treatment
option in highly selected patients with STEMI (e.g., large thrombus burden). Interestingly, a patient-level meta-analysis of
the large RCTs demonstrated that in the subgroup with high thrombus burden (TIMI thrombus grade 3), thrombus
aspiration was associated with fewer cardiovascular deaths (170 [2.5%] vs. 205 [3.1%]; HR 0.80; 95% CI 0.65e0.98;
P ¼ .03), suggesting a benefit and a role for continued use of thrombus removal [33]. In perspective, however, most studies
include all comers, thus, there is no surprise that many thrombus aspiration studies do not demonstrate a significant result.
Subgroup analysis of patients with high thrombus burden is practical and useful in guiding clinicians in daily practice.
The timing of presentation and, therefore, the “quality” of the thrombus following the onset of the MI is also a crucial
point, which determines the outcome of aspiration and PCI. Most studies have not taken this concept into consideration and
TABLE 11.1 Manual Thrombectomy Trials and Outcomes
Clinical End Point
Trial Primary End Point
Phase II
Chao et al. [34] TIMI flow þ MBG NA () 0.014 þ ([) <0.001
Liistro et al. [35] ST resolution () 6-month MACE ([) 0.001
Buzotta et al. [30] MBG þ ST resolution () 30-day MACE ([) 0.020 þ ([) 0.034
De Luca et al. [31] MBG þ ST resolution () 6-month MACE ([) 0.030 þ ([) 0.020
Dudek et al. [36] () ST resolution () 6-month mortality ()
Sardella et al. [37] MBG þ ST resolution ([) 2-year cardiac death 0.001 and
Ciszewski et al. [38] Myocardial salvage () In-hospital mortality ([) 0.020
Silva-Orrego et al. [39] MBG þ ST resolution () In-hospital MACE ([) 0.030 þ ([) 0.020
Phase III
Stone et al. [17] () Infarct size NA () 0.51
Svilass et al. [12] MBG ([) 1-year cardiac 0.02 and all-cause
Chevalier et al. [40] MBG þ () ST resolution () 30-day MACE ([) 0.025 þ () 0.218
Frobert et al. [41] () 30-day mortality () 30-day mortalityþ() 30-day MACE () 0.63
Jolly S et al. [33] () Mortality and MACE at
180 days
(MACE and Mortality)
MACE 0.04
mortality 0.04
() Mortality and MACE at 180 days () 0.86
(Result) Primary
End Point Significance
()
([) <0.001
MACE, major adverse coronary events; MBG, myocardial blush grade; TIMI, thrombolysis in myocardial infarction.

Practical Perspectives on the Guidelines for Management of Coronary Thrombus Chapter | 11 167
https://t.me/med1917
this might have influenced the findings of nonsuperiority of aspiration compared with PCI. As per the recent ESC updated
guidelines, in cases of large residual thrombus burden after opening the vessel with a guidewire or a balloon, thrombus
aspiration may be considered [20].
Case 2 illustrates the utilization of thrombectomy as indicated by the aforementioned guidelines. A 26-year-old man
who presented with chest pain and anterior STEMI had a history of nephrotic syndrome.
Coronary arteriography demonstrated a visible thrombus in the proximal LAD with reduced distal flow (Fig. 11.2A).
Optical coherence tomography imaging confirmed the presence of thrombus with no associated coronary plaque rupture
(Fig. 11.2B). IC treatment with the GP IIb/IIIa platelet receptor antagonist eptifibatide was administered followed by
thrombus aspiration using an Export aspiration catheter. A large burden of heavy white and red thrombus was aspirated and
an improvement in distal flow was noted (Fig. 11.2C). Medical treatment with eptifibatide for 48 h and anticoagulation with
fondaparinux and prasugrel were given after the angiogram. Echocardiography revealed impaired left-ventricular function
with apical thrombus. A repeat angiogram 2 weeks later demonstrated an unobstructed LAD with TIMI 3 flow (Fig. 11.2D).
Distal Protection Devices
Distal EPDs have been designed to minimize the distal embolization of debris during coronary intervention. They are
predominantly used in saphenous vein graft (SVG) intervention, with old RCTs supporting their use in reducing distal
(A)
(C)
(B)
(D)
FIGURE 11.2 (A) Thrombus in proximal to middle left anterior descending artery. (B) Optical coherence tomography imaging demonstrating
intracoronary thrombus. (C) Thrombus removed using thrombectomy catheter. (D) Angiogram after thrombus aspiration.

168 Cardiovascular Thrombus
https://t.me/med1917
embolization, no reflow, and periprocedural MI [42,43]. Examples of EPDs include proximal occlusion aspiration device
and distal filter, which uses a distal basket to trap the debris and maintain distal perfusion. Evidence for the use of EPDs in
native coronary arteries is limited to studies in STEMI, which fail to demonstrate any beneficial effect of routine embolic
protection on myocardial reperfusion or clinical outcomes. Thus, the aforementioned European and American guidelines
for revascularization recommend the use of EPDs for PCI of SVG lesions if technically feasible (ESC class IB and AHA/
ACC class 1B). Notably, despite the recommendations of these guidelines, the actual use of protection devices in real-word
clinical practice is surprisingly low. In one 2015 trial, the EPDs were used in only 21% of contemporary SVG PCIs [44].
The limited use of EPDs could be explained by thei r small size, the lack of support for utilization based on studies that
failed to demonstrate an advantage of use, and the new dual antiplatelet therapy and statins that may have an impact on the
safety and durability of SVG PCI. The clinical benefit of EPDs in carotid artery stenting is more established and recommended in international guidelines. A 2017 study reported by Knappich and colleagues showed significant clinical
benefit of lower stroke and death rates after carotid stenting [45]. Case 3 describes the application of a distal protection
device as recommended by the guidelines: a 72-year-old woman presented with chest pain and 1 month of shortness of
breath. ECG demon strated T-wave inversion in the lateral leads and the serum troponin T level was elevated. The medical
history included coronary artery bypass surgery 15 years earlier (grafts included left internal mammary artery (LIMA) to
LAD, SVG to RCA, SVG to obtuse marginal branch of the circumflex artery (OM)1, and SVG to OM2). Coronary
arteriography disclosed occluded native vessels, patent LIMA to LAD, severe lesi on in the SVG to the RCA, and severe
lesion with thrombus in the SVG to OM, the last considered the acute culprit lesion (Fig. 11.3A). PCI of this vessel
(A)
(C)
(B)
(D)
FIGURE 11.3 (A) SVG to OM lesion and thrombus. (B) SVG to OM Spider protection device deployment. (C) SVG to OM after stent deployed.
(D) SVG to OM stent 7 days poststenting. SVG, saphenous vein graft; OM, Obtuse marginal branch of the circumflex artery.

Practical Perspectives on the Guidelines for Management of Coronary Thrombus Chapter | 11 169
https://t.me/med1917
included two boluses of IC eptifibatide followed by Spider protection device deployment and thrombus aspiration by
Export catheter with no thrombus seen in the aspirate (Fig. 11.3B). A direct DES was deployed in the SVG with resultant
TIMI 3 flow (Fig. 11.3C). The Spider protection device ’ s basket was taken out with no debris embolized distally. Selective
angiogram 7 days later during stenting of the SVG RCA lesion demonstrated good results in the stented SVG OM
(Fig. 11.3D).
Excimer Laser
Utilization of the US FDA-approved excimer l aser is a potentially useful strategy in large thrombus burden as it can
dissipate thrombus, can vaporize procoagulant mediators [46,47], and may suppress platelet aggregation [50]. Laser
therapy also has a debulking effect on atherosclerotic plaques and may reduce distal embolization and microvascular
dysfunction and facilitate stent deployment [49,50]. Despite the appeal of laser therapy for thrombus removal, only
limited clinical data are available supporting its use. The largest study at this writing, the multicenter registry Cohort of
Acute Revascularization of Myocardial Infarction with Excimer Laser (CARMEL), enrolled 151 acute MI (AMI)
patients, 65% of whom had large thrombus burden in the culprit artery [48] . The use of excimer laser resulted in
significantly improved TIMI flow grade (1.2e2.8), with an associated reduction in angiographic stenosis (83%e52%).
There was a low rate (8.6%) of MACEs [51]. The maximal effect was observed in arteries with a large angiographic
thrombus burden. Only one RCT has been performed, in a small number of AMI patients, demonstrating the safety
and feasibility of laser use with outcomes comparable to those of standard treatment; however, further study is
needed [52].
Stent Choice for Thrombotic Conditions
This topic is covered thoroughly in Chapter 19 in this book.
Overall, there has been exploration of the yield of a bare metal stent platform covered with a polyethylene terephthalate
mesh (MGuard stent) that aims to trap thrombus and hence prevent distal embolization [53]. There has been one multicenter randomized study (n ¼ 433) comparing the efficacy of the MGuard stent with that of conventional stents (either bare
metal stent (BMS) or DES) in STEMI. The primary outcome of complete STR postprocedure was significantly better in the
patients randomized to the MGuard stenting arm compared with conventional stenting (57.8% vs. 44.7%, absolute difference 13.2%; 95% CI 3.1%e23.3%; P ¼ .008) [54]. Subgroup analyses showed the highest differences favoring the
MGuard stent in cases with large thrombus burden; however, the incidence of repeat revascularization was higher than in
the control group (8.6% vs. 0.9%, P ¼ .0003). Limitations of the MGuard are coverage of side branches with mesh and the
bulkiness of the device. Further evaluation of the MGuard stent was provided in the MASTER II trial, an international,
multicenter, randomized trial designed to enroll 1114 patients to show the superiority of the MGuard stent vs. conventional
PCI in clinical events such as death or MI. However, because of a higher than expected frequency of stent dislodgment, the
study was voluntarily suspended in April 2014 after enrollment of 310 patients (155 pati ents per group). Analysis of this
limited size cohort showed no benefit of the MGuard stent in any of the end points (STR 56.9% vs. 59.3% for the control
group, P ¼ .68; mortality 0.6% vs. 1.9%, respectively, P ¼ .62). Similarly, a pooled analysis of the MASTER I and II trials
(n ¼ 743) failed to show better myocardial reperfusion (STR 57.5% for the MGuard vs. 50.7% for the control group,
P ¼ .07), although mortality at 30 days was lower (0.3% vs. 1.9%, P ¼ .03) [55]. Thus, data from randomized trials
suggest that the use of the MGuard stent may reduce distal embolization and may improve survival at 30 days compared
with other commercially available coronary stents, although ultimately, larger clinical outcome trials are needed to
determine if this strategy of trapping the thrombus with a mesh-covered stent improves clinical outcomes and whether it
would be optimal to have a drug-eluting version to avoid restenosis.
As for self-expanding stents, vessels with a large thrombus burden carry the risk of distal embolization when stenting
with a balloon-expandable stent [56]. The STENTYS stent is a nitinol self-expanding stent made for atraumatic
deployment. Gentle deployment of the STENTYS stent from distal to proximal may capture loose thrombus and reduce the
likelihood of the thrombus dislodging and traveling distally during stent deployment [55]. The evidence on self-apposing
stents originates from the APPOSITION program [55e58]. In the most recent randomized APPOSITION IV study
involving 152 STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI, the self-apposing, sirolimus-eluting STENTYS stent was
equivalent to a conventional drug-eluting balloon-expandable stent with respect to late stent strut apposition and coverage
at 9 months; however, stent strut apposition and coverage at 4 months were significantly better in the STENTYS group
[58]. Use of this stent in specific high thrombus lesions has not been directly studied.

170 Cardiovascular Thrombus
https://t.me/med1917
The Deferred Stenting Management Strategy
Deferring stenting in primary PCI has been investigated as an option to reduce distal embolization of thrombotic material
and preserve microcirculatory function, especially in the presence of a high thrombus burden. Two small studies found
conflicting results regarding the effect of deferred stenting [59,60]. In the larger (1215 STEMI patients) DANAMI
3-DEFER (Danish Third Study of Optimal Acute Treatment of Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial
InfarctioneDeferred vs. conventional stent implantation in patients with STEMI) trial [61], the deferred stenting (48 h
post-index procedure) had no effect on the primary clinical outcome (composite of all-cause mortality, nonfatal MI, or
ischemia-driven revascularization of the infarct-related artery lesions), and routine deferred stenting was associated with a
higher need for target-vessel revascularization. Based on these findings, the established guidelines do not recommend the
routine use of deferred stenting [20]. However, a certain limitation of these guidelines rests with the interpretation of
“routine use.” Select cases of high thrombus burden may, in fact, benefit from this specific stent strategy. Overall, the
burden of high thrombus volume on interventions remains a major technical challenge [62] and the interventionalist carries
the responsibility for finding a patient-specific therapeutic solution [63]. This frequently challenges the operator to
introduce a nonconventional thrombus removal strategy [64]. It raises the notion that potentially, deferred stenting
management may be considered a valid option alongside adjunctive pharmacology for selected patients, despite the current
negative recommendation from the recognized guidelines.
APPROACHES IN EXCEPTION TO THE CURRENT GUIDELINES
In cases of coronary arteries with massive thrombus burden, it is important to extract the thrombus completely to restore
coronary flow and prevent no reflow and continued aggressive thrombus accumulation [65]. A major limitation of current
standard aspiration thrombectomy is the small inner cross-sectional area whereby the suction power is often insufficient to
evacuate occlusive thrombotic material [66]. Furthermore, a large thrombus may become entrapped at the tip of the
aspiration device and then inadvertently released during device withdrawal. This can cause embolic stroke or occlusion of
another artery, which may explain the reported signal for increased risk of stroke with the use of aspiration catheters. An
alternative thrombus management solution has been introduced, involving a “mother/daughter” catheter technique for
improved aspiration. Herein a 6-Fr catheter is inserted into an 8-Fr catheter, with the “mother” catheter shortened to enable
the “daughter” catheter to reach the distal segment of the target artery [67e69]. Although shown as an efficient technique,
serious complications can occur, including coronary dissection, distal embolization, and systemic embolization.
Accordingly, this technique should be considered only in select cases in which the coronary artery is large enough to
accommodate the catheters and the operator experienced in preventing embolization.
Importantly, another alternative revascularization approach should be taken into consideration. At times, in select cases,
it appears that the best management option is to simply leave the thrombus burden untouched. For example, in symptomatic, ischemic patients post-coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABGS) who exhibit early acute vein graft failure,
rather than dealing with the thrombotic graft, native vessel intervention is preferred wherever possible, even if it involves
revascularization of an existing chronic total occlusion (CTO) lesion. This approach reduces the considerable risk of
intragraft intervention, such as distal embolization, no reflow, and MI. Thus, although CTO revascularization in this
clinical setting is challenging, a subset of favorable CTO features for procedural success can be rapidly determined using
contralateral injections for distal visualization of the CTO-containing vessel. To summarize, this approach of entirely
“abandoning the thrombus” can result in avoiding the potential pitfalls and complications of treating high thrombus burden
in a venous bypass graft. Thus, interventionists performing primary PCI should be familiar with this approach. Case 4
demonstrates the application of this unique strategy in a symptomatic patient (Fig. 11.4).
EXPERT OPINION
The presence of thrombus in patients presenting with ACS constitutes a common and adverse finding. There is conflicting
evidence as to the ideal treatment. In the presence of a large thrombus burden, we would recommend crossing the lesion
with a dedicated PCI wire and considering administration of IC GP IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist, accompanied by aspiration
thrombectomy. This should be performed only with deep guide catheter engagement to decrease the risk of systemic
thromboembolism. If despite this pretreatment and balloon angioplasty the persistence of a large thrombus burden remains
evident, then IC thrombolysis or deferred stenting following prolonged infusions of GP IIb/IIIa (24e48 h) receptor
antagonist should be considered. Application of mechanical, powe r-based thrombus extraction or vaporization technology
is an option in select cases with significant thrombus burden, especially when resistant thrombus is encountered.
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
