Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3720_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
30 Мб
Скачать
Practical Perspectives on the Guidelines for Management of Coronary Thrombus Chapter | 11 171
https://t.me/med1917
(A)
(C)
(B)
(D)
FIGURE 11.4 (A) Diagnostic angiogram revealing left anterior descending artery disease and CTO occlusion of the native proximal circumex (Cx)
artery. (B) Occlusion of the saphenous vein graft to the PDA of the Cx. Severe disease with accompanying thrombus in the body of the obtuse marginal vein graft (OMVG) is shown. A decision was made to abandonthe option of thrombus revascularization. (C) Contralateral injection through the OMVG revealed a short segment of occlusion. (D) Final angiogram demonstrating successful results following percutaneous coronary intervention to the native Cx.
SUMMARY
The presence of IC thrombotic lesions, especially those with a high thrombus burden, during PCI is associated with decreased antegrade epicardial ow, distal embolization, no-reow phenomenon, myocardial damage, and poor clinical outcomes. Knowledge a nd understanding of the current established guidelines for treatment of ischemic thrombotic syndromes and comprehension of their specic recommendations for treatment strategies are of paramount clinical importance. The utilization of specic thrombus-bound pharmacological agents and incorporation of dedicated thrombus-targeting interventional techniques should be considered during PCI for ACS, non-STEMI, and STEMI alike. In the majority of cases a drug eluting stent(s) should be implanted to complete revascularization. Howev er, in selected cases a dedicated stent or inde ed no stent at all may be preferred. All aspects of treatment during primary PCI need to be modied with respect to the risk prole, thrombus burden, availability of medical resources, and operator’s experience.
172 Cardiovascular Thrombus
https://t.me/med1917
REFERENCES
[1] Sianos G, Papafaklis MI, Daemen J, Vaina S, van Mieghem CA, van Domburg RT, Michalis LK, Serruys PW. Angiographic stent thrombosis after
routine use of drug-eluting stents in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the importance of thrombus burden. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:573e83.
[2] Miranda-Guardiola F, Rossi A, Serra A, Garcia B, Rumoroso JR, Iñiguez A, Vaquerizo B, Triano JL, Sierra G, Bruguera J, Spanish AMIR.
Angiographic quantication of thrombus in ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction presenting with an occluded infarct-related artery and its relationship with results of percutaneous intervention. J Interv Cardiol 2009;22:207e15.
[3] Sianos G, Papafaklis MI, Serruys PW. Angiographic thrombus burden classication in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. J Invasive Cardiol 2010;22:6Be14B.
[4] Sherman CT, Litvack F, Grundfest W, Lee M, Hickey A, Chaux A, Kass R, Blanche C, Matloff J, Morgenstern L. Coronary angioscopy in patients
with unstable angina pectoris. N Engl J Med 1986;315:913e9.
[5] Gibson CM, de Lemos JA, Murphy SA, Marble SJ, McCabe CH, Cannon CP, Antman EM, Braunwald E, TIMI SG. Combination therapy with
abciximab reduces angiographically evident thrombus in acute myocardial infarction: a TIMI 14 substudy. Circulation 2001;103:2550e4.
[6] Napodano M, Ramondo A, Tarantini G, Peluso D, Compagno S, Fraccaro C, Frigo AC, Razzolini R, Iliceto S. Predictors and time-related impact of
distal embolization during primary angioplasty. Eur Heart J 2009;30:305e13.
[7] Fokkema ML, Vlaar PJ, Svilaas T, Vogelzang M, Amo D, Diercks GF, Suurmeijer AJ, Zijlstra F. Incidence and clinical consequences of distal
embolization on the coronary angiogram after percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2009;30:908e15.
[8] Singh M, Berger PB, Ting HH, Rihal CS, Wilson SH, Lennon RJ, Reeder GS, Bresnahan JF, Holmes DR. Inuence of coronary thrombus on
outcome of percutaneous coronary angioplasty in the current era (the Mayo Clinic experience). Am J Cardiol 2001;88:1091e6.
[9] Fukuda D, Tanaka A, Shimada K, Nishida Y, Kawarabayashi T, Yoshikawa J. Predicting angiographic distal embolization following percutaneous
coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 2003;91:403e7.
[10] Iijima R, Shinji H, Ikeda N, Itaya H, Makino K, Funatsu A, Yokouchi I, Komatsu H, Ito N, Nuruki H, Nakajima R, Nakamura M. Comparison of
coronary arterial nding by intravascular ultrasound in patients with transient no-reowversus reowduring percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndrome. Am J Cardiol 2006;97:29e33.
[11] Henriques JP, Zijlstra F, Ottervanger JP, de Boer MJ, van t Hof AW, Hoorntje JC, Suryapranata H. Incidence and clinical signicance of distal
embolization during primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2002;23:1112e7.
[12] Svilaas T, Vlaar PJ, van der Horst IC, Diercks GF, de Smet BJ, van den Heuvel AF, Anthonio RL, Jessurun GA, Tan ES, Suurmeijer AJ, Zijlstra F.
Thrombus aspiration during primary percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med 2008;358:557e67.
[13] Freeman MR, Williams AE, Chisholm RJ, Armstrong PW. Intracoronary thrombus and complex morphology in unstable angina. Relation to timing
of angiography and in-hospital cardiac events. Circulation 1989;80:17e23.
[14] Zhao XQ, Théroux P, Snapinn SM, Sax FL. Intracoronary thrombus and platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade with tiroban in unstable
angina or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. Angiographic results from the PRISM-PLUS trial (Platelet receptor inhibition for ischemic syndrome management in patients limited by unstable signs and symptoms). PRISM-PLUS Investigators. Circulation 1999;100:1609e15.
[15] Kirma C, Izgi A, Dundar C, Tanalp AC, Oduncu V, Aung SM, Sonmez K, Mutlu B, Ozdemir N, Erentug V. Clinical and procedural predictors of
no-reow phenomenon after primary percutaneous coronary interventions: experience at a single center. Circ J 2008;72:716e21.
[16] Yunoki K, Naruko T, Inoue T, Sugioka K, Inaba M, Iwasa Y, Komatsu R, Itoh A, Haze K, Yoshiyama M, Becker AE, Ueda M. Relationship of
thrombus characteristics to the incidence of angiographically visible distal embolization in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with thrombus aspiration. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2013;6:377e85.
[17] Stone GW, Maehara A, Witzenbichler B, Godlewski J, Parise H, Dambrink JH, Ochala A, Carlton TW, Cristea E, Wolff SD, Brener SJ,
Chowdhary S, El-Omar M, NeunteuT, Metzger DC, Karwoski T, Dizon JM, Mehran R, Gibson CM, INFUSE-AMI. Intracoronary abciximab and aspiration thrombectomy in patients with large anterior myocardial infarction: the INFUSE-AMI randomized trial. J Am Med Assoc 2012;307:1817e26.
[18] Thiele H, Wöhrle J, Hambrecht R, Rittger H, Birkemeyer R, Lauer B, Neuhaus P, Brosteanu O, Sick P, Wiemer M, Kerber S, Kleinertz K, Eitel I,
Desch S, Schuler G. Intracoronary versus intravenous bolus abciximab during primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a randomised trial. Lancet 2012;379:923e31.
[19] Piccolo R, Eitel I, Iversen AZ, Gu YL, Dominguez-Rodriguez A, de Smet BJ, Mahmoud KD, Abreu-Gonzalez P, Thiele H, Piscione F. Intra-
coronary versus intravenous bolus abciximab administration in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a pooled analysis of individual patient data from ve randomised controlled trials. EuroIntervention 2014;9:1110e20.
[20] Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, Antunes MJ, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Bueno H, Caforio ALP, Crea F, Goudevenos JA, Halvorsen S, Hindricks G,
Kastrati A, Lenzen MJ, Prescott E, RofM, Valgimigli M, Varenhorst C, Vranckx P, Widimský P. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: the Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2017;2017.
[21] Kelly RV, Crouch E, Krumnacher H, Cohen MG, Stouffer GA. Safety of adjunctive intracoronary thrombolytic therapy during complex percu-
taneous coronary intervention: initial experience with intracoronary tenecteplase. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2005;66:327e32.
[22] Sezer M, Oaz H, Gören T, Okçular I, Umman B, Nis¸anci Y, Bilge AK, Sanli Y, Meriç M, Umman S. Intracoronary streptokinase after primary
percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med 2007;356:1823e34.
[23] Kim JS, Kim JH, Jang HH, Lee YW, Song SG, Park JH, Chun KJ. Successful revascularization of coronary artery occluded by massive intra-
coronary thrombi with alteplase and percutaneous coronary intervention. J Atheroscler Thromb 2010;17:768e70.
Practical Perspectives on the Guidelines for Management of Coronary Thrombus Chapter | 11 173
https://t.me/med1917
[24] Greco C, Pelliccia F, Tanzilli G, Tinti MD, Salenzi P, Cicerchia C, Schiariti M, Franzoni F, Speziale G, Gallo P, Gaudio C. Usefulness of local
delivery of thrombolytics before thrombectomy in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (the delivery of thrombolytics before thrombectomy in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention [DISSOLUTION] randomized trial). Am J Cardiol 2013;112:630e5.
[25] Varin R, Mirshahi S, Mirshahi P, Klein C, Jamshedov J, Chidiac J, Perzborn E, Mirshahi M, Soria C, Soria J. Whole blood clots are more resistant to
lysis than plasma clotsegreater efcacy of rivaroxaban. Thromb Res 2013;131:e100e9. [26] Jamal N, Bapumia M. Dual antiplatelet agents and Rivaroxaban for massive intracoronary thrombus in STEMI. Clin Case Rep 2015;3:927e31. [27] Ohman EM, Roe MT, Steg PG, James SK, Povsic TJ, White J, Rockhold F, Plotnikov A, Mundl H, Strony J, Sun X, Husted S, Tendera M,
Montalescot G, Bahit MC, Ardissino D, Bueno H, Claeys MJ, Nicolau JC, Cornel JH, Goto S, Kiss RG, Güray Ü, Park DW, Bode C, Welsh RC,
Gibson CM. Clinically signicant bleeding with low-dose rivaroxaban versus aspirin, in addition to P2Y12 inhibition, in acute coronary syndromes
(GEMINI-ACS-1): a double-blind, multicentre, randomised trial. Lancet 2017;389:1799e808. [28] Mega JL, Braunwald E, Murphy SA, Plotnikov AN, Burton P, Kiss RG, Parkhomenko A, Tendera M, Widimsky P, Gibson CM. Rivaroxaban in
patients stabilized after a ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results from the ATLAS ACS-2-TIMI-51 trial (Anti-Xa therapy to lower
cardiovascular events in addition to standard therapy in subjects with acute coronary syndrome-thrombolysis in myocardial infarction-51). J Am Coll
Cardiol 2013;61:1853e9. [29] Gibson CM, Chakrabarti AK, Mega J, Bode C, Bassand JP, Verheugt FW, Bhatt DL, Goto S, Cohen M, Mohanavelu S, Burton P, Stone G,
Braunwald E, TIMI. I, ATLAS-ACS. Reduction of stent thrombosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes treated with rivaroxaban in ATLAS-
ACS 2 TIMI 51. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;62:286e90. [30] Burzotta F, Trani C, Romagnoli E, Mazzari MA, Rebuzzi AG, De Vita M, Garramone B, Giannico F, Niccoli G, Biondi-Zoccai GG, Schiavoni G,
Mongiardo R, Crea F. Manual thrombus-aspiration improves myocardial reperfusion: the randomized evaluation of the effect of mechanical
reduction of distal embolization by thrombus-aspiration in primary and rescue angioplasty (REMEDIA) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:371e6. [31] De Luca L, Sardella G, Davidson CJ, De Persio G, Beraldi M, Tommasone T, Mancone M, Nguyen BL, Agati L, Gheorghiade M, Fedele F. Impact
of intracoronary aspiration thrombectomy during primary angioplasty on left ventricular remodelling in patients with anterior ST elevation
myocardial infarction. Heart 2006;92:951e7. [32] Ikari Y, Sakurada M, Kozuma K, Kawano S, Katsuki T, Kimura K, Suzuki T, Yamashita T, Takizawa A, Misumi K, Hashimoto H, Isshiki T, I.
VAMPIRE. Upfront thrombus aspiration in primary coronary intervention for patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction: report
of the VAMPIRE (VAcuuM asPIration thrombus REmoval) trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2008;1:424e31. [33] Jolly SS, James S, Dzavík V, Cairns JA, Mahmoud KD, Zijlstra F, Yusuf S, Olivecrona GK, Renlund H, Gao P, Lagerqvist B, Alazzoni A, Kedev S,
Stankovic G, Meeks B, Frøbert O. Thrombus aspiration in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: an individual patient meta-analysis:
thrombectomy trialists collaboration. Circulation 2017;135:143e52. [34] Chao CL, Hung CS, Lin YH, Lin MS, Lin LC, Ho YL, Liu CP, Chiang CH, Kao HL. Time-dependent benet of initial thrombosuction on
myocardial reperfusion in primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Int J Clin Pract 2008;62:555e61. [35] Liistro F, Grotti S, Angioli P, Falsini G, Ducci K, Baldassarre S, Sabini A, Brandini R, Capati E, Bolognese L. Impact of thrombus aspiration on
myocardial tissue reperfusion and left ventricular functional recovery and remodeling after primary angioplasty. Circ Cardiovasc Interv
2009;2:376e83. [36] Dudek D, Mielecki W, Burzotta F, Gasior M, Witkowski A, Horvath IG, Legutko J, Ochala A, Rubartelli P, Wojdyla RM, Siudak Z, Buchta P,
Pregowski J, Aradi D, Machnik A, Hawranek M, Rakowski T, Dziewierz A, Zmudka K. Thrombus aspiration followed by direct stenting: a novel
strategy of primary percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Results of the Polish-Italian-Hungarian
RAndomized ThrombEctomy Trial (PIHRATE Trial). Am Heart J 2010;160:966e72. [37] Sardella G, Mancone M, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Agati L, Scardala R, Carbone I, Francone M, Di Roma A, Benedetti G, Conti G, Fedele F. Thrombus
aspiration during primary percutaneous coronary intervention improves myocardial reperfusion and reduces infarct size: the EXPIRA (thrombec-
tomy with export catheter in infarct-related artery during primary percutaneous coronary intervention) prospective, randomized trial. J Am Coll
Cardiol 2009;53:309e15. [38] Ciszewski M, Pregowski J, Teresinska A, Karcz M, Kalinczuk Ł, Pracon R, Witkowski A, Ru_zyłło W. Aspiration coronary thrombectomy for acute
myocardial infarction increases myocardial salvage: single center randomized study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2011;78:523e31. [39] Silva-Orrego P, Colombo P, Bigi R, Gregori D, Delgado A, Salvade P, Oreglia J, Orrico P, de Biase A, Piccalò G, Bossi I, Klugmann S. Thrombus
aspiration before primary angioplasty improves myocardial reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction: the DEAR-MI (Dethrombosis to Enhance
Acute Reperfusion in Myocardial Infarction) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:1552e9. [40] Chevalier B, Gilard M, Lang I, Commeau P, Roosen J, Hanssen M, Lefevre T, Carrié D, Bartorelli A, Montalescot G, Parikh K. Systematic primary
aspiration in acute myocardial percutaneous intervention: a multicentre randomised controlled trial of the export aspiration catheter. EuroIntervention
2008;4:222e8. [41] Fröbert O, Lagerqvist B, Olivecrona GK, Omerovic E, Gudnason T, Maeng M, Aasa M, Angerås O, Calais F, Danielewicz M, Erlinge D, Hellsten L,
Jensen U, Johansson AC, Kåregren A, Nilsson J, Robertson L, Sandhall L, Sjögren I, Ostlund O, Harnek J, James SK, Taste T. Thrombus aspiration
during ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2013;369:1587e97. [42] Baim DS, Wahr D, George B, Leon MB, Greenberg J, Cutlip DE, Kaya U, Popma JJ, Ho KK, Kuntz RE, Saphenous vein graft Angioplasty Free of
Emboli Randomized (SAFER) Trial Investigators. Randomized trial of a distal embolic protection device during percutaneous intervention of
saphenous vein aorto-coronary bypass grafts. Circulation 2002;105:1285e90. [43] Stone GW, Rogers C, Hermiller J, Feldman R, Hall P, Haber R, Masud A, Cambier P, Caputo RP, Turco M, Kovach R, Brodie B, Herrmann HC,
Kuntz RE, Popma JJ, Ramee S, Cox DA, FilterWire EXREI. Randomized comparison of distal protection with a lter-based catheter and a balloon
occlusion and aspiration system during percutaneous intervention of diseased saphenous vein aorto-coronary bypass grafts. Circulation
2003;108:548e53.
174 Cardiovascular Thrombus
https://t.me/med1917
[44] Brennan JM, Al-Hejily W, Dai D, Shaw RE, Trilesskaya M, Rao SV, Brilakis ES, Anstrom KJ, Messenger JC, Peterson ED, Douglas PS,
Sketch MH. Three-year outcomes associated with embolic protection in saphenous vein graft intervention: results in 49 325 senior patients in the Medicare-linked National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI Registry. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2015;8:e001403.
[45] Knappich C, Kuehnl A, Tsantilas P, Schmid S, Breitkreuz T, Kallmayer M, Zimmermann A, Eckstein HH. The use of embolic protection devices is
associated with a lower stroke and death rate after carotid stenting. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2017;10:1257e65.
[46] Topaz O, Minisi AJ, Bernardo NL, et al. Alterations of platelet aggregation kinetics with ultraviolet laser emission: the stunned platelet
phenomenon. Thromb Haemost 2001;86:1087e93.
[47] Topaz O. Plaque removal and thrombus dissolution with pulsed-wave lasersphotoacoustic energy-biotissue interactions and their clinical
manifestations. Cardiology 1996;87:384e91.
[48] Topaz O, Topaz A. Laser in acute myocardial infarction. In: Topaz O, editor. Lasers in cardiovascular interventions. London, UK: Springer; 2015.
p. 55e68.
[49] Rawlins J, Talwar S, Green M, OKane P. Optical coherence tomography following percutaneous coronary intervention with Excimer laser coronary
atherectomy. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 2014;15:29e34. [50] Fracassi F, Roberto M, Niccoli G. Current interventional coronary applications of excimer laser. Expert Rev Med Devices 2013;10:541e9. [51] Topaz O, Ebersole D, Das T, Alderman EL, Madyoon H, Vora K, Baker JD, Hilton D, Dahm JB, CARMEL MT. Excimer laser angioplasty in acute
myocardial infarction (the CARMEL multicenter trial). Am J Cardiol 2004;93:694e701. [52] Dörr M, Vogelgesang D, Hummel A, Staudt A, Robinson DM, Felix SB, Dahm JB. Excimer laser thrombus elimination for prevention of distal
embolization and no-reow in patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction: results from the randomized LaserAMI study. Int J Cardiol
2007;116:20e6. [53] Gracida M, Romaguera R, Jacobi F, Gómez-Hospital JA, Cequier A. The MGuard coronary stent: safety, efcacy, and clinical utility. Vasc Health
Risk Manag 2015;11:533e9. [54] Stone GW, Abizaid A, Silber S, Dizon JM, Merkely B, Costa RA, Kornowski R, Abizaid A, Wojdyła R, Maehara A, Dressler O, Brener SJ, Bar E,
Dudek D. Prospective, randomized, multicenter evaluation of a polyethylene terephthalate micronet mesh-covered stent (MGuard) in ST-segment
elevation myocardial infarction: the MASTER trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;60:1975e84. [55] van Geuns RJ, Tamburino C, Fajadet J, Vrolix M, Witzenbichler B, Eeckhout E, Spaulding C, Reczuch K, La Manna A, Spaargaren R, García-
García HM, Regar E, Capodanno D, Van Langenhove G, Verheye S. Self-expanding versus balloon-expandable stents in acute myocardial
infarction: results from the APPOSITION II study: self-expanding stents in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Interv
2012;5:1209e19. [56] Koch KT, Grundeken MJ, Vos NS, IJsselmuiden AJ, van Geuns RJ, Wessely R, Dengler T, La Manna A, Silvain J, Montalescot G, Spaargaren R,
Tijssen JG, Amoroso G. One-year clinical outcomes of the STENTYS Self-Apposing coronary stent in patients presenting with ST-segment
elevation myocardial infarction: results from the APPOSITION III registry. EuroIntervention 2015;11:264e71. [57] Amoroso G, van Geuns RJ, Spaulding C, Manzo-Silberman S, Hauptmann KE, Spaargaren R, García-García HM, Serruys PW, Verheye S.
Assessment of the safety and performance of the STENTYS self-expanding coronary stent in acute myocardial infarction: results from the
APPOSITION I study. EuroIntervention 2011;7:428e36. [58] van Geuns RJ, Yetgin T, La Manna A, Tamburino C, Souteyrand G, Motreff P, Koch KT, Vrolix M, IJsselmuiden A, Amoroso G, Berland J,
Montalescot G, Teiger E, Christiansen EH, Spaargaren R, Wijns W. STENTYS Self-Apposing sirolimus-eluting stent in ST-segment elevation
myocardial infarction: results from the randomised APPOSITION IV trial. Euro Interv 2016;11:e1267e74. [59] Carrick D, Oldroyd KG, McEntegart M, Haig C, Petrie MC, Eteiba H, Hood S, Owens C, Watkins S, Layland J, Lindsay M, Peat E, Rae A,
Behan M, Sood A, Hillis WS, Mordi I, Mahrous A, Ahmed N, Wilson R, Lasalle L, Généreux P, Ford I, Berry C. A randomized trial of deferred
stenting versus immediate stenting to prevent no- or slow-reow in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (DEFER-STEMI). J Am Coll
Cardiol 2014;63:2088e98. [60] Belle L, Motreff P, Mangin L, Rangé G, Marcaggi X, Marie A, Ferrier N, Dubreuil O, Zemour G, Souteyrand G, Caussin C, Amabile N, Isaaz K,
Dauphin R, Koning R, Robin C, Faurie B, Bonello L, Champin S, Delhaye C, Cuilleret F, Mewton N, Genty C, Viallon M, Bosson JL, Croisille P, I.
MIMI. Comparison of immediate with delayed stenting using the minimalist immediate mechanical intervention approach in acute ST-segment-
elevation myocardial infarction: the MIMI study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2016;9:e003388. [61] Kelbæk H, Høfsten DE, Køber L, et al. Deferred versus conventional stent implantation in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
(DANAMI 3-DEFER): an open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2016;387:2199e206. [62] Topaz O. The thrombus containing lesion. In: Topol EJ, Teirstein, editors. Textbook of intrventional cardiology. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier;
2015. p. 439e63. [63] Topaz O. Editorial. Revascularization of thrombus laden lesions in AMI-the burden on the interventionalist. J Invas Cardiol 2007;19:324e5. [64] Topaz O. Editorial. Novel thrombus displacement technology for STEMI revascularization. CCI 2012;80:65e6. [65] Topaz O. Editorial. On the hostile massive thrombus and the means to eradicate it. CCI 2005;65:280e1. [66] Topaz O. Editorial. Comparison between thrombus removal devices: aspirations meet reality. CCI 2011;78:20e2. [67] Onoda S, Mutoh M, Ishikawa T, et al. Usefulness of a 6 fr right judkins catheter for mechanically extracting a massive intracoronary thrombus from
an ectasic right coronary artery: a report on two different cases of thrombectomy. Jpn Heart J 2004;45:673e8.
[68] Kim DK, Ko SH, Seo GW, et al. Mechanical extraction of a massive intracoronary thrombus from the super-dominant right coronary artery in
thrombogenic lung cancer patient. Korean Circ Journal 2015;45:248e52.
[69] Mani AJ. Novel use of a guide extension mother-and-child catheter for adjunctive thrombectomy during percutaneous coronary intervention for
acute coronary syndromes. J Invas Cardiol 2014;26:249e54.
Chapter 12
https://t.me/med1917
Thrombus Classifications: Critical Tools for Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiovascular Procedures
On Topaz
1
Charles George Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Asheville, NC, United States;2Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States;
3
Brooklyn Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, United States
1,2
and Allyne Topaz
3
INTRODUCTION
Atherosclerotic plaques and accompanying thrombus share a complex morphologic structure, which can cause severe impairment of blood ow and decrease tissue perfusion. This process accounts for the development of coronary and peripheral ischemic syndromes [1,2]. Consequently, thrombus is recognized as a critical nding during diagnostic angi­ography and interventions, with a profound impact on prognosis in patients with ischemic heart disease [3]. Identication of intracoronary thrombus calls for careful assessment of the thrombotic structure and proper selection of tailored phar­macotherapy [4] and revascularization tools [5e10]. As thrombus is frequently found in patients with unstable angina pectoris and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) [11e14], it imposes a considerable challenge to the performance and the outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) [15]. This stems from the unique morphologic characteristics and physical properties of the thrombus structure [8,16]. Intriguingly, despite constant improvements of treatment strategies, as of this writing, thrombus remains a strong predictor of PCI-induced major adverse coronary events, including development of acute and late stent thrombosis [17], increased rate of in-hospital complications, AMI, and death at 6 months [18e20]. Furthermore, in patients who exhibit residual thrombus postprocedure, it continues to exert a deleterious effect on the outcome. Illustrating this point, Harjai and colleagues [21] discovered that in AMI patients in whom PCI gained antegrade thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) grade 2 or 3 ow, the identication of residual intracoronary thrombus is associated with worse cardiovascular outcomes. Thus, the quest for improved recognition, assessment, and dedicated treatment strategies for the management of thrombotic lesions and vessels continues to evolve [3,8,16].
RATIONALE FOR UTILIZATION OF THROMBUS CLASSIFICATIONS
The interference of thrombus with blood ow and its capability of discharging procoagulants and vasoactive reactants play a major clinical role. During cardiovascular interventions the clinical and angiographic response of thrombus to phar­macotherapy interventional equipment varies and, frequently, is quite unpredictable. Hence, a need arises to describe the morphology and size of the thrombus. For that purpose, several classications offer direct clinical/angiographic assessment of the volume/burden of the offending thrombus [22]. Altogether, the utilization of thrombus classicationsdas displayed in Table 12.1dcan enhance accuracy, safety, and efcacy of PCI, leading to the performance of high-quality interventions
[16]. Intriguingly, despite the recognition of the critical role thrombus plays and its signicant impact on PCI outcome [23e26], a relatively small number of publications on revascularization for ischemic coronary syndromes actually
document the presence of intracoronary thrombus. Furthermore, even studies that report the presence of thrombus infrequently describe morphology or grade the thrombotic load [27]. The aim of this chapter is to highlight the details and
Cardiovascular Thrombus. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812615-8.00012-0
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
175
176 Cardiovascular Thrombus
https://t.me/med1917
TABLE 12.1 Factors Promoting Formation of a Large Thrombus Size
Slow blood flow in a thrombus-containing vessel Acute myocardial infarction: prolonged time interval between onset of chest pain to percutaneous intervention, usually longer than 6 h Acute vessel closure Vessel dissection Vessel perforation Large vessel diameter Aneurysm Old bypass saphenous vein graft Syndromes of hypercoagulopathy Inadequate anticoagulation Large metal burden (stents, guidewires) Cocaine use Metamphetamine and sport supplements use
role of contem porary angiographic classications for thrombus scoring. This approach should provide a practical platform for subsequent improvement of the outcome and prognosis of coronary as well as peripheral vascular interventions.
THROMBUS: FROM FORMATION TO ACCUMULATION
The critical processes accountable for thrombus formation are initiated when disr upted, highly thrombogenic sub­endothelial matrix and plaque are exposed to circulating platelets and white blood cells. This activates the coagulation cascade leading to platelet adhesion and aggregation and the creation of thrombus (Fig. 12.1). Concomitant release of tissue factor from the arterial injury site activates the extrinsic coagulation cascade and promotes brin formati on. The activated platelets release powerful vasoconstricti ve compounds and aggregation agents such as serotonin, adenosine diphosphate, thromboxane A
, oxygen-derived free radicals, endothelin, and platelet-activating factor [28]. As the
2
thrombus vigorously accumulates, blood ow at and distal to the thrombotic lesion turns slow and turbulent. Clinically, the accompanying vasoconstriction further impairs myocardial perfusion, adversely affects the hemodynamics, and enhances development of ischemic coronary events [29]. Moreover, during PCIs, operators frequently are challenged by the marked friability of the thrombus at the targeted lesion. Yet, at times, an opposite reaction of the thrombus is encountered, with marked resistance to removal attempts by extraction techniques. Such structural instability and rigidity occurs while the
FIGURE 12.1 Histopathology of a cross section of a heavy-burden occlusive coronary thrombus (T) (Elastin Van Gieson Staining, ELVG4x). Courtesy
of Shannon Mackey-Bojack. The Jesse E. Edwards Registry of Cardiovascular Disease, Nasseff Heart Center, United Hospitals, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, St. Paul, MN; From Topaz O, The thrombus containing lesion. In: Topol EJ, Teirstein P, editors. Textbook of Interventional Cardiology. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2015, with permission.
Thrombus Classifications: Critical Tools for Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiovascular Procedures Chapter | 12 177
https://t.me/med1917
FIGURE 12.2 Thrombus as explored by scanning electron microscope. The crisscrossing thick and thin brin bers create a scaffolding for the
thrombus structure. Platelets (violet color) and red blood cells are attached to the brin net. From Textbook of Interventional Cardiology. 6th ed. Topol E, Teirstein PS, editors. Philadelphia: Elsevier. p. 338. With permission (courtesy of Marc Carr Jr, MD, PhD).
thrombus may loosely or rmly adhere to the underlying atherosclerotic plaque and vessel wall. This duality of response and seemingly contradictory characteristics of thrombus, i.e., eith er marked friability or a resistance, stem from cumulative effects, which are generated by an assortment of thrombus components. Structurally, the thrombus is supported by a framework made of brin bers [30], which anchor platelets and red blood cells as shown in Fig. 12.2. Two distinct types of branching brin bers are organized in a three-dimensional network. Thin bers are more dense and exhibit resistance to degradation due to higher elastic modulus (i.e., expression of resistance). Thus, thin bers demonstrate more resistance to deformation by mechanical tools and pharmacologic agents. The opposite holds true for thick brin bers, which are more rapidly dissolved by brinolytic agents, exert lower elastic modulus, and are more easily deformed by external forces (e.g., guidewires, balloons, stents, etc.). There are numerous causes behind the formation of thin versus thick brin bers. There are genetic causes, such as Dusarts disease (autosomal dominant disorder of qualitatively abnormal brinogens), which causes formation of thin bers with increased resistance to degradation and a hypercoagulable state. In addition, acquired etiologies such as diabetes mellitus may cause hyperglycosylation of brinogen leading to formation of thinner bers capable of increased resistance to degradation. Ionic causes, such as pH shifts, ionic strength changes, or calcium concentrations can also affect ber size. Kinetic causes, including rapid assembly, will also create thinner bers. Platelets, red blood cells, procoagulants, and vasoconstrictors are anchored to the matrix of the crisscrossing bers. Abnormalities in platelet function can persist and also predict adverse clinical events following PCI [31,32]. In patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes, the platelets that adhere to the thrombus exert a signicant increase in contractile force. This leads to increased platelet aggregation and the entire thrombotic structure exhibits increased elastic modulus [23,24]. The platelets sustain and amplify the coagulant response at the plaque site and further release procoagulant platelet-derived micro­particles [33]. Prominent factors accounting for the formation of a high-grade thrombus burden are displayed in Table 12.1. Two factors, which have drawn recent attention, are hyperglycemia and an increased white blood cell count [29]. Both factors additionally portend the lack of ST-segment resolution in AMI and are associated with worse PCI outcome [34].
Table 12.1 depicts a list of factors promoting formation of a large thrombus burden.
SCORING SYSTEMS FOR CORONARY THROMBUS
Angiography remains the most practical imaging modality for identication and quantication of intracoronary and peripheral arterial thrombus during the diagnostic and intervention portions of cardiac and vascular catheterization. Classication and scoring systems are useful for quantication and qualication of the thrombus burden. Table 12.2 describes the utility of thrombus classications. These systems provide clinicaleangiographic correlation with resultant effect on management decisions prior to, during, and after interventions. The widely used TIMI thrombus grading clas­sication as displayed in Table 12.3 was published in 1985 by the TIMI study investigators. This innovative scale was based on the recognition that the yield of thrombolytic therapy for evolving AMI was dened by varying sizes and load of
178 Cardiovascular Thrombus
https://t.me/med1917
TABLE 12.2 Utility of Thrombus Classifications
1. Provide a universal method of assessment for thrombus burden
2. Readily available angiographic method for quantification of thrombus size, morphology, and location
3. Based on visual analysis without contact with the occlusive thrombus
4. Enhance choice of revascularization strategy and tools
5. Allow thrombus comparison with previous diagnostic angiograms and interventions
6. Enable correlation and prediction of the effect of the thrombus burden on subsequent clinical events and outcomes
TABLE 12.3 The TIMI Thrombus Grading Classification
Grade 0: No angiographic evidence of thrombus.
Grade 1: Angiographic suggestion of thrombus,
1. decreased contrast density,
2. haziness of the contrast,
3. irregular contour of the atherosclerotic plaque,
4. a smooth convex meniscus at the site of a total occlusion, is considered suggestive but not firmly diagnostic of thrombus.
Grade 2: Definite thrombus present in multiple angiographic projections. Features include marked irregular plaque contour with a significant filling defect . The thrombus’s greatest dimension is <1/2 of the vessel diameter.
Grade 3: Definite thrombus appears in multiple angiographic views with its greatest dimension from >1/2 to <2 times the vessel diameter.
Grade 4: Definite large-size thrombus present with greatest dimension >2 times the vessel diameter.
Grade 5: Definite total thrombotic occlusion of a vessel. A convex margin stains with contrast, persisting for several cardiac cycles.
angiographically evident intracoronary thrombi [35]. Relying on visual assessment of cineangiographic views of the thrombus size compared with the diameter of the host vessel, this original TIMI thrombus classication was dened as follows: in TIMI thrombus grade 0, no cineangiogr aphic characteristics of thrombus are present; in TIMI thrombus grade 1, possible thrombus is present as determined by such angiography characteristics as reduced contrast density, hazine ss, irregular lesion contour, or a smooth convex meniscusat the site of total occlusion suggestive but not diagnostic of thrombus; in TIMI thrombus grade 2, there is denite thrombus, with greatest dimensions <1/2 the vessel diameter; in TIMI thrombus grade 3, there is denite thrombus but with greatest linear dimension >1/2 but <2 vessel diameters; in TIMI thrombus grade 4, there is denite thrombus, with the largest dimension >2 vessel diameters; and in TIMI thrombus grade 5, there is total occlusion. While this classication is user friendly and universally accepted, the accuracy of both the scores lowest level, i.e., grade 0, and the scores highest level, i.e., grade 5, can be questioned. With its hallmark characteristic of TIMI 0 ow, the ischemic vessel that contains a thrombus grade 5 is totally occluded. Consequently, the actual ratio between the volume of the underlying plaque and the associated thrombus volume is unknown, yet the assumption of the TIMI scale is that this grade represents the highest thrombus burden. Fig. 12.3AeK presents the different TIMI grades.
In a development intent on overcoming the limitation of the original TIMI grade 5, an important modication was introduced in 2007 by the Thoraxcenter investigators from Rotterdam, the Netherlands [36]. They added a critical step to the recognition and management of this specic grade consisting of a restratication process as shown in Table 12.4. The restratication method incorporates insertion of a thin PCI guidewire or a 1.5-mm balloon for crossing and recanalization of the occlusive grade 5 thrombus. This signicantly improves the determination of an underlying occlusive thrombus because in most instances this intervention restores at least some measure of antegrade ow. The next step is angiographic stratication of the exposedthrombus within the recanalized artery. Accordingly, a small thrombus burden is represented by grades 1e3 and a large thrombus burden is referred to as grade 4. Then the optimal revascularization tool can be selected for application. From a practical standpoint, the stratied small residual thrombus can be managed with an aspiration catheter followed by implantation of any stent. Adjunct pharmacotherapy can be tailored as well to the targets needs. For efcient removal, the large-size residual thrombus, especially when resisting standard aspiration, requires application of a powe r-based mechanical thrombectomy device [37]. Among the prominent devices for this task are rheolytic thrombectomy, excimer laser, and the X-Sizer [38e40], with subsequent post-thrombus-removal utilization of
Thrombus Classifications: Critical Tools for Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiovascular Procedures Chapter | 12 179
https://t.me/med1917
(A) (B)
(C)
(E)
(F)
(D)
FIGURE 12.3 (AeK) Grades of thrombus as dened by the classic TIMI thrombus grading and stratication. (A) Grade 0: no thrombus present. The
marked plaque (red circle) exhibits smooth and clear borders without haziness, located in the middle segment of the left anterior descending artery. (B) Grade 1: suspected thrombus in the plaque occupying the middleedistal right coronary artery (red circle). (C) Grade 2: eccentric plaque and associated thrombus located in the distal left main coronary artery (red circle). (D) Grade 3 thrombus in the middle segment of the right coronary artery (red circle). (E) Grade 4: represented by heavy layers of thrombus almost completely obstructing distal ow. (F) Grade 5: total thrombotic occlusion of the proximal left anterior descending artery in a patient with acute anterior wall myocardial infarction (red arrow). (G) Restratication of the grade 5: utilizing a guidewire and a small balloon, the thrombus was transformed to grade 2 (red circle). Thus, the initial thrombus corresponds to thrombus grade 5 type A. (H) Final percutaneous coronary intervention results after stenting of the target lesion demonstrating marked patency of the vessel and no residual thrombus (nal grade 0). (I) Thrombus grade 5 in the ostium-proximal portion of an old saphenous vein bypass graft in a patient with unstable angina and ischemia of the inferior-lateral wall (red circle). (J) Grade 5 stratication resulted in the guidewire being able to cross the total thrombotic occlusion and positioned distally, but no antegrade ow was restored. This corresponds to grade 5 type B. (K) Final angiography after application of excimer laser and stenting over the guidewire reveals adequate patency of the old graft with no residual thrombus.
(G)
180 Cardiovascular Thrombus
https://t.me/med1917
(H)
(J) (K)
(I)
TABLE 12.4 The Restratification of TIMI Thrombus Grade 5
Angiographic grade 5 TIMI thrombus is followed with advancement of a percutaneous coronary intervention guiding wire or a small balloon across the thrombotic total occlusion. This, in most instances, causes restoration of antegrade flow in the treated artery. Repeat coronary angiography demonstrates the level of underlying thrombus burden. Then thrombus restratification ensues: Grade 0: No residual thrombus Grades 1e3: Small residual thrombus Grade 4: Large residual thrombus
FIGURE 12.3 cont’d