Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_921_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
31 Мб
Скачать
Section 1: General Topics
Tab le 1
Laboratory Evaluation of Immune and Nutritional Parameters to
Help Predict Healing Response to Injury and Surgery
Laboratory Value
Prealbumin Severe risk: <10 mg/dL
Albumin 3.5-5.5 g/dL Overall protein-energy malnutrition; acute trends indicate improve-
Total protein 5.5-8.0 g/dL Global protein-energy nutrition status of the patient
Total lymphocyte
count
Total cholesterol Severe risk: <50 mg/dL
also must be evaluated to improve healing and help prevent complications caused by infection parameters should be identified, with appropriate management strategies ini­tiated immediately. However, because timing often is critical in limb salvage procedures and amputations, complete correction of immune and nutritional deficits often is not feasible; correction must simply be initiated and continued throughout the perioperative period and through hospital discharge.
Commonly Accepted Normal Range or Threshold
Moderate risk: 10-17 mg/dL
Malnutrition: <1,500 cells/mm
At risk: <150 mg/dL
should be maximized (for example, catheterization, control of hypertension,
1,2
(Table 1). These
and diabetes). Venous outflow also may be diminished in these patients, so ad­equate planning must be undertaken if limb salvage is planned (for example, sa­phenous mapping for an arterial-venous loop to provide a vascular axis for a free flap). Peripheral vascular disease typi­cally is progressive, and multiple periph­eral vascular revisions may be required. The use of limb salvage in this setting may be guided by the surgeon’s experi-
3
ence, direct input from the patient, and
Vascular Status
The principles of evaluating and treat-
a global assessment of quality of life if
multiple major revisions are required. ing peripheral vascular disease are par­ticularly important because adequate vascularity is a critical factor when de­ciding on limb salvage or amputation. Adequate arterial inflow is mandatory for all patients undergoing limb salvage, whether in the setting of infection, trau­ma, the immediate coverage of defects after tumor resection (Figure 1), or com­plications from external beam radiation. Patients with peripheral vascular dis­ease often are elderly, diabetic, and/or smokers and may have preexisting car­diac disease. Thus, these patients have important risk factors for perioperative complications. These risk factors must be evaluated (for example, cardiac stress testing), and the patient’s health status
Considerations for Limb
Salvage or Amputation
Peripheral Vascular
Arterial Disease
Adequate arterial blood supply to the
tissues is necessary for normal tissue
metabolism and healing, and arterial in-
flow must be adequate before limb sal-
vage or amputation can be considered.
The less complex Fontaine classification
and the more inclusive Rutherford clas-
sification of peripheral vascular arterial
disease (PVAD) are useful screening
tools that use patient symptoms and
objective measures (arterial pressures)
to allow stratification of patients with
preexisting PVAD (Table 2).
Comments
Overall protein-energy malnutrition; one of the most rapidly changing
nutritional parameters to follow in the acute setting.
ments in nutrition.
Protein-energy malnutrition and immune status; low values are
considered ominous for healing complications that may not be able to be treated acutely.
Overall caloric malnutrition; very low values indicate severe malnutri-
tion, which requires intensive nutritional supplementation; at risk for mortality.
Newer classification schemes for pre­dicting outcomes have been presented and are being validated.3 However, the most basic and often simplest methods to help determine successful healing af­ter limb salvage or amputation are still the direct physical examination and an arterial evaluation. Arterial assessment includes both noninvasive and invasive evaluations. Physical examination of pulses along with a bedside Doppler examination are quick and easy initial examinations. Arteriography, computer­assisted arteriography, and magnetic resonance arteriography are evaluation tools to better assess and plan the tech­nical execution of a surgical procedure and have their relative merits (Table 3). Transcutaneous oxygen measurements are supplemental and of greater use in the noninvasive evaluation of chronic wound healing potential. Such measure­ment provides information pertaining to a site-specific area but has limitations when edema is present and is highly operator dependent; its greatest utility is when amputation is selected and data on healing potential are desired at a certain level of amputation. All of these evaluations, however, must be tempered with experience and sound clinical judgment.
Venous outflow is important to con­trol chronic tissue changes as well as
Atlas of Amputations and Limb Deciencies, Fourth Edition © 2016 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
42
Chapter 4: General Principles of Limb Salvage Versus Amputation in Adults
Figure 1
after tumor and vessel resection: clamps are on the arterial stumps, and a saphenous vein graft (arrow) will be used. C, Photograph of the nal recon­structi on for limb salvage that used r eversed saphenous vein fo r arterial and venous recons truction, sural ner ve grafts for motor ne rve reconstructio n, and anterolateral thigh free ap for coverage of the soft-tissue defect. (Courtesy of Stephen J. Kovach III, MD, Philadelphia, PA.)
Tab le 2
Stage Clinical Findings Grade Category Clinical Findings
the health of tissues in the immediate perioperative period of limb salvage (for example, free tissue transfers) (Fig- ure 2). Surrogate methods to improve venous return and reduce edema, such as intermittent gradient compression de­vices, frequent medical wraps (for exam­ple, calamine/gelatin paste dressings), and compression stockings, are vital to improving venous return and pre­venting chronic adverse tissue changes. In the immediate postoperative period
A, MRI of a popliteal fossa tumor (long arrow) involving the popliteal vessels (short arrow). B, Intraoperative photograph of the defect
Classications of Peripheral Vascular Arterial Disease
Fontaine Classification Rutherford Classification
I Asymptomatic 0 0 Asymptomatic
IIa Mild claudication
IIb Moderate to severe claudication 2 Moderate claudication
III Ischemic rest pain 3 Severe claudication
IV Ulcer/gangrene II 4 Ischemic rest pain
I
III
of limb salvage (after free-tissue trans­fers to maintain an amputation level or salvage an entire limb), mild elevation, adequate pharmacologic anticoagula­tion, and dangling protocols assist in preventing venous occlusion, which, if severe, can result in microanastomotic arterial thrombosis.
Limb edema often is caused by multiple factors, including venous in­sufficiency, reperfusion overload, and cardiac, renal, and primary/secondary
1 Mild claudication
5 Minor tissue loss
6 Major tissue loss
lymphatic insufficiency. The effects of chronic edema resulting from any of the primary causes can be compounded by a secondary etiology as well as poor nutrition (low serum albumin/protein level, resulting in low serum oncotic pressure). Regardless of the cause, ede­ma is believed to result in a relative re­duction of local tissue oxygen perfusion, thus potentiating poor healing. Edema may delay wound healing or result in tissue ulceration.4 In most patients,
© 2016 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Atlas of Amputations and Limb Deciencies, Fourth Edition
43
Section 1: General Topics
Tab le 3
Tools for Arterial Evaluation
Doppler Examination CTA MRA Arteriography
Indication Evaluation of ow beyond
pulse palpation
Utility Easily performed by clinician
at bedside with simple handheld Doppler to determine phasicity of arterial ow and augmen­tation of ow by checking retrograde lling of the ar­terial tree. Advanced color ow and velocity gradients can identify occult intimal lesions.
CTA = computer-assisted arteriography, MRA = magnetic resonance arteriography.
Evaluation of arterial in-
ow when Doppler ex­amination is limited or preoperative planning requires investigation of arterial lumen.
Evaluation of major
arterial network to determine patency of vessels for preoperative planning; especially useful in patients not suited for MRI. Easier to interpret than MRA.
Patients who have undergone a mastectomy or axillary dissection may have chronic edema in the upper limbs. Primary lymphatic patency should be investigated in the setting of massive refractory edema that is uncontrolled by medical maximization and standard control methods, such as manual edema control programs, edema pumps, and garments. Preoperative investigations include dye-based and scintigraphic lymphangiograms. Although in its in fancy, vascularized lymph node transfer may be helpful in controlling massive edema in patients with refractory edema that impedes healing after limb salvage
5
Figure 2
partial ap necrosis secondary to poor ve­nous outow. (Courtesy of Christopher Bibbo, DO, FACS, Marsheld, WI.)
Postoperative photograph of
or amputation.
Nerve Injury and Psychological and Psychiatric Conditions
Acute nerve injury is most likely to occur in patients as the result of a traumatic injury or in those with musculoskeletal
temporary control of edema can be ob­tained during tissue healing; however, in certain patients (for example, those with Milroy disease, those treated with radiation, or patients who have under­gone lymph node dissection), edema in the lower limb may impede successful limb salvage.
tumors as a result of the oncologic re­section. Acute nerve injury is not a re­liable predictor of success or failure of either limb salvage or amputation.6 In general, nerve transections are amenable to direct grouped fascicular repair. The recovery of nerve injuries is expected at a rate of 1 mm/day. Nerve injuries
Same as CTA Same as CTA and when percu-
Same as CTA; longer
time for image acquisition and more dicult in extremity arterial evaluation.
taneous interventions are being considered.
Fine details and run-o (opera-
tor dependent). To enhance healing, stenting with or without mechanical ablation of lesions can be performed to maximize ow velocity across stenotic areas before limb salvage or amputation.
that pose special problems in trauma patients are segmental nerve loss (Fig- ure 3) and severe brachial plexopathies with nerve root avulsion. Nerve trans­fer and grafting techniques are avail­able that will produce good functional results in the upper limb.
6
The loss of nerve segments in a mu­tilated lower limb is problematic. These cases require specialized techniques, in­cluding free vascularized nerve trans-
-
fers, in situ nerve transfers, and muscle and tendon transfers or tenodesis. In a patient being treated with a limb salvage protocol in whom vascular, bony, and soft-tissue issues have been successfully managed or who has a limb with only an isolated nerve injury, strong consid­eration should be given to the contin­uation of limb salvage efforts. This is especially true if some motor function is anticipated. Pure sensory deficits in a lower limb in an otherwise supple limb are not necessarily indications for amputation. Appropriate bracing and skin protection measures may allow the limb to assist in functional ambulation. Salvage should be given even greater consideration in an upper limb because of the devastating nature of upper limb amputations, especially if a lower limb
Atlas of Amputations and Limb Deciencies, Fourth Edition © 2016 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
44
Chapter 4: General Principles of Limb Salvage Versus Amputation in Adults
Figure 3
repair (B) in a patient with traumatic segmental loss of the common peroneal nerve after an open knee dislocation. (Courtesy of Christopher Bibbo, DO, FACS, Marsheld, WI.)
Intraoperative photographs of a full-length sural nerve graft (A), which was divided into three cables for grouped fascicular
amputation is already present.
The treatment of a limb with isolated, long-segment nerve loss can be managed with grouped fascicular nerve grafting accompanied by a long recovery period; however, there is the potential for irre­versible muscle wasting. In patients with nerve loss accompanied by composite tissue loss (nerve plus bone, muscle, and skin) or late loss of function, free functional muscle transfers have become a valuable tool for accomplishing limb
7-16
salvage
(Figure 4).
Patients with chronic pain syndrome (type I or II) who experience trauma or massive infection require special con­sideration. In these patients, the limb may have substantial tissue changes and limited function before the trau­matic injury or the onset of infection.
Figure 4
tissue ap. Motor branch to gracilis muscle (inset, white dashed circle) is anastomosed to the proximal musculocutaneous nerve using subcostal nerve grafts (white arrow). Arterial and venous vessels are microanastomosed to branches of the brachial vessels. (Courtesy of L. Scott Levin, MD, Philadelphia, PA.)
Intraoperative photograph of arm reconstruction with a functional gracilis free-
In addition to the physical state of the limb, these patients frequently have substantial psychological disability that manifests as anxiety or depressive dis­orders, including posttraumatic stress disorder (Axis I disorder), which may be compounded by their current traumatic injury (Axis III disorder).17 These pa­tients should undergo a thorough neu­ropsychiatric evaluation as part of the global salvage versus amputation eval­uation. The patient’s psychological and
psychiatric profile weighs heavily into the equation that determines functional recovery and overall quality of life. In up to 50% of patients with type I chronic pain syndrome, pain will worsen with amputation;18 nevertheless, the patient may elect amputation after thorough counseling (Figure 5). Limb salvage procedures can also result in substantial additional physiologic stress for these patients, deterioration of their mental
health status, and worsening of their pain syndrome. However, appropriate multidisciplinary counseling, careful planning, and realistic expectations can achieve reasonable outcomes after limb salvage.
Unique considerations also apply to patients who sustain complete spinal cord injuries or severe closed head in­juries. In patients who are paraplegic, the level of injury, overall limb function,
© 2016 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Atlas of Amputations and Limb Deciencies, Fourth Edition
45
Section 1: General Topics
Figure 5
old patient wi th type I chronic pain sy ndrome who smokes and had ve sur geries for polymicro bial drug-resistant osteomyelitis (staged as Cierny-Mader type B-IV). The patient elected transtibial amputation. (Courtesy of Christopher Bibbo, DO, FACS, Marsheld, WI.)
and the care setting are critical in deter­mining whether to proceed with limb salvage or amputation. For example, if the patient has the potential to use a “stander” platform, or the limbs assist with sitting and balance, salvage should be considered. Limb salvage of an upper limb is warranted in paraplegic patients because the upper limb often is the patient’s last resource for independent function. Patients who are either paraple­gic or quadriplegic with an at-risk limb require thorough evaluation. If the limb is a liability to the patient’s near-term overall health or survival, amputation may be the best option (Figure 6). Pa­tients with closed head injuries and an expected poor recovery must be evaluat-
Clinical photograph (A) and AP radio graph (B) of the infecte d lower limb of a 38-year-
having a functional or useful limb re­quire a preemptive psychological and psychiatric evaluation along with a glob­al assessment of future quality of life, with or without the limb. The surgeon must remember that all patients value an intact body image, which directly af fects mental health and global quality of life. Thus, the value of a psycholog­ical and psychiatric evaluation and an open dialogue with the surgical team, which concentrates on realistic goals, outcomes, and patient desires, are vitally important. In situations in which limb preservation or amputation is required to preserve life, the surgical team may have to make a decision without input
from the patient. ed and managed in the acute setting (life over limb), but the long-term sequelae of their brain injuries, including useful functional status, must be considered.
Patients with progressive neurolog-
ic conditions who have little chance of
Functional Potential
and Quality of Life
The assessment of future limb function
is made by the treating orthopaedic sur-
geon in conjunction with input from the
physical medicine and the rehabilitation teams. Typically, motor function and pa­tient motivation are the key factors in achieving optimal function and quality of life. The patient’s perception of his or her future quality of life may be strongly influenced by the surgical team leader’s expertise and experience; therefore, it is important that the surgeon provide an unbiased assessment of the pros and cons of limb salvage and amputation.
Multidisciplinary Resources
Complex limb salvage or major ampu­tation surgery require a comprehensive, sophisticated set of surgical services, including trauma, oncologic, orthopae­dic, plastic reconstructive, and vascular disciplines. Ancillary services, includ­ing physical medicine, rehabilitation, prosthetics and orthotics, physical and occupational therapy, psychology, psy­chiatry, and discharge planning should also be available to aid the patient throughout his or her hospitalization and during the rehabilitation phases of recovery.
Infection in an Adult
The need to consider limb salvage in the setting of musculoskeletal infections is common. Severe necrotizing infec­tions may occur in otherwise healthy
-
patients, but patients who are immuno­compromised are more likely to have an at-risk limb and systemic sepsis. In addi­tion, these patients often have diabetes and poor glucose control. Other at-risk subgroups include patients with phar­macologic immune suppression, such as those who have had a solid organ trans­plant and are steroid dependent; those receiving tumor necrosis factor-α and in­terleukin-6 suppression for conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis or Crohn disease; and patients with cancer. Infec­tion control is essential because contin­ued infection results in tissue death and local and regional arterial and venous thrombosis, which perpetuate the pro­cess of tissue necrosis.
Atlas of Amputations and Limb Deciencies, Fourth Edition © 2016 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
46
Chapter 4: General Principles of Limb Salvage Versus Amputation in Adults
Figure 6
current decubitus ulcers (after failure of previous rotation aps), diuse osteomyelitis, pathologic fractur e of the hip and acetabulum, an d xed ankle and knee  exion deformit y. Intraoperative pho­tographs show the massive decubitus ulcer that extended to the hip joint and pathologic fracture (B), enucleation of the infected femur (C), and creation of the thigh llet ap (D). E, Final AP radio­graph of the inter nal hemipelvectomy res ection and creation of th e pelvic sling with biol ogic mesh (dashed circle). F, Final intraoperative photograph of the pelvic resection margins and inset thigh llet ap. The ap is made slightly large to re-create the silhouette of a limb, as well as provide re­dundant tissue for p ossible future needs . (Courtesy of Christophe r Bibbo, DO, FACS, Marsheld, WI.)
Bacterial infections remain the most common type of infections, whether the primary source is the integument or muscle.19 Direct extension of the in­fection into other tissues can be rapid, especially in necrotizing infections. The immediate goals of limb salvage are to halt further spread of the infection (thus limiting systemic toxicity and the
A, Pelvic radiograph of a patient with septic T5-level paraplegia with massive re-
amount of local tissue destruction) and preservation of the integrity of the major and secondary vessels of the limb.
Fungal infections are suspect for underlying immune suppression and may involve soft tissue and bone and disseminate to internal organs. Fun­gal infections in patients who are im­munocompromised may be extremely
Figure 7
blastomycosis, with concomitant involvement of the spleen, liver, and skin, in an immuno­compromised patient. A staged reconstruction of the calcaneus using multiple débridements, uconazole/voriconazole antifungal beads, and massive autologous bone grafting result­ed in salvage of the patient’s foot. (Courtesy of Christopher Bibbo, DO, FACS, Marsheld, WI.)
MRI scan of a massive calcaneal
difficult to eradicate and often have high morbidity and mortality rates, neces­sitating consideration of amputation. However, if the patient has adequate physiologic reserve to tolerate multiple wide débridements and long-term anti­fungal therapy and the potential for use of a functionally salvageable limb, then attempts at limb salvage are warranted (Figures 7 and 8).
When acute or chronic osteomyeli­tis is present, thorough débridement is needed. The patient’s comorbidities and the extent of the osseous infection are critical factors when undertaking limb salvage for osteomyelitis. The Cierny-Mader classification for chronic adult osteomyelitis (Table 4) provides categoric descriptive items that should be considered; however, this tool cannot dictate treatment plans. The key assess­ments as outlined in this chapter also must be examined. Evaluation tools for osteomyelitis include plain radiographs and indium-111/technetium dual­window scans with “spot” CT and MRI.
The most reliable method for the diagnosis of osteomyelitis is the anal­ysis of deep bone cultures surgically
© 2016 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Atlas of Amputations and Limb Deciencies, Fourth Edition
47
Section 1: General Topics
Figure 8
operative photograph of the limb. Purpuric skin discoloration may be seen in mucormycosis infections along with dark discoloration of the deep soft tissues. Intraoperative photographs of the limb salvage procedure that included multiple débridements and an amphotericin rod and beads, paren­teral liposomal amphotericin, wide resection of the involved skin and bone, followed by a peroneus brevis ap (B) and use of a ne-wire frame (C).
D, Final radiograph showing successful limb salvage with tibiotalar fusion. (Courtesy of Christopher Bibbo, DO, FACS, Marsheld, WI.)
Tab le 4
Anatomic Location
I = Medullary II = Supercial III = Localized IV = Diuse
An extensive mucormycosis infection developed in the lower limb of a patient with type 1 diabetes after an open ankle fracture. A, Pre-
Cierny-Mader Classication of Adult (Chronic) Osteomyelitis
Type A Host Type B Host Type C Host
Healthy patient; nor-
mal response to stress and trauma; normal response to infection.
Comorbidities
compromise both healing and the response to treatment.
Comorbidities
so severe that treatment is worse than disease; treatment is to ob­serve and palliate or amputate.
stabilization, and restoration of bone and soft-tissue integrity are needed (Figure 10).
Infected joint prostheses with non­healing wounds that expose the implant present a considerable challenge to suc­cessful limb salvage. However, diligent care and adherence to the principles of adequate débridements, culture- specific antibiotics, bony stabilization, and wound coverage, may allow the limb to be salvaged; more challenging cases may require flap coverage (Figures 11
obtained from a patient who has not been given antibiotics for 5 to 7 days before the specimen is obtained. Os­teomyelitis is a biologically complex disease. Deep bone specimens must be obtained because surface areas will be heavily contaminated. Specimens should be sent for aerobe, anaerobe, acid fast, and fungal cultures. Speci­mens with negative cultures should be held for bacterial 16S polymerase chain reaction testing and, if appro­priate, 18S polymerase chain reaction testing for fungal infections. However, patients with the most complex cases
of osteomyelitis may still warrant limb salvage, even if an unstable soft- tissue envelope is present (Figure 9).
Infection in the Upper Limb
Infections of the upper limb are less common, with hand infections compris­ing the bulk of upper limb infections. Nonetheless, upper limb amputations are very disabling, so every effort should be made to preserve an infected limb. In patients with diabetes, upper limb infec­tions are extremely serious, especially when osteomyelitis is present. Multiple staged irrigations and débridements,
and 12) or late functional free-flap tissue transfers (Figure 4).
Because the upper limb has highly specialized functions, limb salvage is the preferred option if feasible. When salvage is not possible, amputation and prosthetic fitting should be considered. In the past, upper limb prostheses pro­vided limited function; however, cur­rent techniques to augment function, such as targeted muscle reinnervation techniques, hold promise for regaining motor group function that will facil­itate the improved use of upper limb prostheses.
20
Atlas of Amputations and Limb Deciencies, Fourth Edition © 2016 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
48
Chapter 4: General Principles of Limb Salvage Versus Amputation in Adults
Figure 9
soft-tissue envelope. A, Clinical photograph of the unstable soft-tissue envelope. B, AP radiograph shows diuse grade IVB osteomyelitis. C, Oblique radiograph shows posttraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head and neck (arrow). D, Intraoperative photograph of the proximal tibial ring block for proximal tib ial distraction osteo genesis. Soft-tissue and b one resection margins ar e seen at the distal third of the le g. E, Intraoperative photograph of the reverse sural ap coverage over the soft-tissue defect. F, Full-length radiograph of the limb with knee reconstruction in progress. A total hip arthropl asty was perf ormed to regain hip func tion and limb length f rom the contribution of th e pelvic girdle. G, Postoper ative nal clinical photogr aph after full healing of the bone and soft tissue. H, Final postoperative AP radiograph. The bifocal Ilizarov method of distal compression and proximal distraction osteogenesis restored bone length and alignment. (Courtesy of Christopher Bibbo, DO, FACS, Marsheld, WI.)
Images demo nstrate limb salvage in a 35-ye ar-old man w ho is an alcoholic and smoker and w ho has tibial osteomyelitis and an u nstable
© 2016 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Atlas of Amputations and Limb Deciencies, Fourth Edition
49
Section 1: General Topics
Figure 10
tempts at stab ilization of a distal radiu s fracture. Clinical volar (A) a nd dorsal (B) photographs of th e infected hand and dist al forearm. C, AP radiograph of the wrist demonstrating diuse osteomyelitis. D and E, Intraoperative photographs of wide débridements of soft-tissue and bone. F, Radiograph shows Ilizarov stabilization. G, Intraoperative photograph of pan-wrist fusion after administration of parenteral antibiotics and obtaining negative bone cultures. H, Conversion to a hinged e xternal ring xator w ith distractive/compressive s truts. Negative- pressure dressing is seen on th e volar wrist surface. I and J, Final postoperative p hotographs show successful limb s alvage after healing o f the volar skin grafts . Osseous union allowed remov al of the external xator, which was followed by aggressive edema reduction and hand therapy. (Courtesy of Christopher Bibbo, DO, FACS, Marsheld, WI.)
Foot Infection in Patients With Diabetes
Diabetic foot infections in patients 65 years or older occur at a rate of 6%, with a concordant 11% mortality rate that increases to approximately 22% af­ter a lower limb amputation.21 Diabetic ulcers range in severity from an ulcer at the tip of a toe to massive ulcers with infection of an entire limb (Figure 13). Aggressive débridements, the use of negative-pressure dressings (includ­ing antibiotic/antiseptic instillation), hyperbaric oxygen therapy, and prop­er management of diabetes have been
Diuse osteomyelitis and sepsis developed in a 74-year-old right-hand–dominant patient with type 1 diabetes after three failed at-
successful in salvaging the foot in most diabetic patients with foot infections. However, many patients with diabetes and foot infections are challenging to treat because of multiple preexisting medical comorbidities. These patients require metabolic control and optimi­zation of cardiovascular health and peripheral vascular system functions to allow successful limb salvage. Med­ical management is needed to control blood glucose levels, and dialysis needs and electrolyte balance must be opti­mized. The patient should be careful­ly evaluated for cardiac disease; a low
threshold for perfusion stress testing and catheterization is warranted. If the patient does not have adequate physiologic reserve and the reversal of coexisting medical comorbidities is not possible, then primary amputa­tion should be considered. However, in the absence of contraindications, limb salvage can achieve positive results, allowing a patient to have a useful limb for locomotion in the home or community.
If limb salvage is planned for an infected lower limb, it is necessary to ensure that the limb has adequate
Atlas of Amputations and Limb Deciencies, Fourth Edition © 2016 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
50
Chapter 4: General Principles of Limb Salvage Versus Amputation in Adults
Figure 11
treated with ex tensive débridement and polyethylene insert exchange (B), and an extended medial gastrocnemius myocutaneous ap (C). (Courtesy of Christopher Bibbo, DO, FACS, Marsheld, WI.)
vascularity and will be useful to the patient (for example, helping to pro­pel a wheelchair or allowing full ambulation). It is important that the salvage procedure does not create cir­cumstances that will place the limb or the patient’s life at future risk. For example, when multiple toes require amputation, resulting in a foot with one or two toes, the salvaged toes, foot, and limb are at greater risk of injury and infection. In this setting, isolated toe salvage may not be prudent, and a higher-level amputation (for example, transmetatarsal) may provide a more durable, stable limb.
Efforts for salvage or amputation to the transtibial level are encouraged. However, even in patients with diabe­tes and PVAD, limb salvage by methods such as free tissue transfer can result in good long-term results after revascu­larization; thus, amputation is not the automatic choice in all patients with dysvascular disease or diabetes.
Intraoperative photographs of an acutely exposed and infected but well-xed total knee replacement with a soft-tissue defect (A),
Charcot Neuroarthropathy in Patients With Diabetes
Charcot neuroarthropathy is a debilitat­ing disorder that affects up to 2.5% of patients with diabetes. First described in patients with tabes dorsalis, it is now recognized as a complex problem that involves neuropathy, an overall altered metabolic state that results in an im­balance of the neurohumoral regula tory mechanisms of the bones and joints of the foot and the ankle. On a cellular basis, an inciting event appears to trig­ger cell-signaling pathways, resulting in an imbalance of osteoclastic and os-
outcome from the Charcot process re­sulting in a spectrum of resultant de­formities. If altered weight bearing and poor diabetic control remain untreat­ed, skin breakdown, ulceration, and soft-tissue and bony infections may result. Limb salvage is an option in pa­tients with Charcot neuroarthropathy, even when severe open wounds and bone loss are present (Fig u re 14). In the experience of the lead author of this chapter (CB), the management of physiologic parameters (namely blood glucose control) is of utmost importance
for acute and long-term success. teoblastic activity.27 If the patient has substantial loss of bone mineral density,
22-25
a neuropathic dislocation will develop and frank Charcot bone destruction may ensue,28 causing loss of periarticu­lar bony stability, joint destruction, and varying degrees of collapse of the foot and the ankle.
Protected weight bearing and strict
26
diabetic control will cause the process to enter a resolution phase, with the final
Physiologic Reserve
and Comorbidities
In the setting of acute necrotizing or pu-
rulent infections, the first consideration
is preservation of life over limb. It should
be recognized that the use of antibiot-
ics or antifungal medications with their
attendant toxicities, multiple débride-
ments with blood loss, and the possi-
bility of multiple future reconstructive
© 2016 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Atlas of Amputations and Limb Deciencies, Fourth Edition
51