Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_917_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
32 Мб
Скачать
358
• Pfannenstiel incision for extraction
• Surgeon and assist on patient’s right side
• Surgical tech and sterile instrument table on patient’s left side
• Monitor angled at left shoulder and left lower extremity
E. M. Haas and A. V. Hayman
Port Placement (Fig.23.2)
• If you prefer a 10mm camera, the umbilical port will need to be upsized to a
12 mm port size. On occasion, placing the camera in another port may be
required, and these ports will also need to be upsized or an additional 5mm cam-
era opened.
• The midline 5mm port can usually be hidden in the upper ridge of the umbilicus;
however, if the distance between the umbilicus and suprapubic region is rela-
tively short, then the optical eld of view may be limited. In these cases, placing
the midline port a few centimeters superior the umbilicus is an option.
• If planning to fashion an ileostomy, the 12mm RLQ can be placed at the lateral
margin of the predetermined ileostomy site. Care should be taken not to place the
Fig. 23.2 Port placement
5 mm
12 mm
5 mm
5 mm
optional
23 Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection forRectal Cancer: TME Planes andSurgery…
359
12mm RLQ port adjacent to the planned ileostomy site as this may result in dif-
culty pouching the stoma.
• It is recommended to close the fascia on all 12mm port sites due to hernia risk.
Other Equipment/Incisions
Extraction site: Several options exist for the extraction site. We prefer a
Pfannenstiel incision because it can usually also allow direct access to the anas-
tomosis in cases in which repair of an anastomotic defect is required. It is also
associated with a very low rate of hernia risk. Other extraction sites, however,
can be used such as an umbilical site or the left lower quadrant. In cases in which
we plan to perform an ileostomy, we use the ileostomy site as extraction site.
Camera: A 5mm 30 degree or exible tip camera is preferred.
Instruments: Atraumatic bowel graspers are required. It is recommended to have
extended length graspers available.
Energy devices: Monopolar energy devices include the L or J hook, spatula, or
scissors with cautery. Thermal energy can include various devices designed to
control vessels up to 7mm size, such as a bipolar device or ultrasonic device.
Operative Technique andSurgical Steps
Planes oftheMesorectum
Both medial-to-lateral and lateral-to-medial approaches are utilized during the lapa­roscopic procedure. The procedure is preferably initiated in a medial-to-lateral fash­ion to identify the critical landmarks and develop the proper planes of mesenteric dissection. The medial side of the mesentery is exposed by elevating the rectosig­moid with a bowel grasper to identify the thin base near the sacral promontory. The peritoneum is carefully scored and the avascular presacral plane is dissected. Pneumodissection in the alveolar tissue signies the correct plane between presa­cral fascia and the fascia propria of the rectum. The superior rectal artery (SRA) is identied and elevated to further expose the plane of dissection (Fig.23.3). The left ureter and gonadal vessels are exposed very early in the dissection. The avascular plane is dissected further while elevating the SRA taking care not to injury the nerves in the deeper plane. Dissection continues laterally in the retroperitoneal plane toward the white line of Toldt, inferiorly to the level of the sacral promontory and superiorly toward the base of the IMA.At this level, the peritoneal plane is scored in an upside-down “U” fashion, starting at the base of the bifurcation, sweep­ing up as it follows the vessel’s course into the pelvis, and then extending distally to where the anterior reection terminates laterally in the pararectal gutter.
The plane between the retroperitoneal structures posteriorly and the mesorectum anteriorly is then developed. Dissection from the CO tify this avascular plane; after inltrating into the tissues, they appear as white,
insufation again helps iden-
2
360
Fig. 23.3 Medial-to-
lateral dissection with elevation of the superior rectal artery (SRA) and exposure of the retroperitoneal plane
E. M. Haas and A. V. Hayman
crackly bers. After sweeping over the sacral promontory from right to left, it is important to remember that the lateral retroperitoneal structures of interest, speci­cally the ureter, gonadal vessels, and internal iliac artery and vein, lie slightly supe­rior to the presacral fascia. Therefore, the surgeon has to be careful to not proceed in so linear a fashion as to injure these structures. The dissection plane will be identied quite high on the edge of the mesorectum when dissecting the lateral­most area.
In order to avoid creating a tunnel when performing the above dissection, the surgeon should periodically reexamine the right peritoneal edge and continue to open up the triangle that forms between the aorta and IMA pedicle, scoring the peritoneum in a radial fashion right up to the IMA take off. The surgeon will encoun­ter small bridging nerves in this area. These should be preserved if possible or ligated as anteriorly as possible.
In order to preserve planes and perform a meticulous dissection, many use hot scissors, L hook, or thermal energy device tip to carefully dissect between planes. The use of thermal or bipolar energy is typically not used to establish the planes of dissection and is reserved to control bleeding or division of vascular pedicles.
Once the vascular pedicle has been adequately skeletonized, and the surgeon has ensured that the left retroperitoneal structures at risk (i.e., ureter, gonadal vein) are lateral, the vessel can be divided (Fig.23.4). Either a low (preserving the left colic (LCA) and/or sigmoid branches) or high ligation of the IMA and inferior mesen­teric vein (IMV) is then performed (Table23.1). If performing a low ligation, care is taken to dissect the mesenteric lymph nodes in the fatty tissue along the base of the IMA and draw this tissue into the resection margins so as not to leave behind draining lymph nodes (Fig.23.5).
The surgeon then continues the mesenteric transection up to the site of planned proximal colonic division, which can be immediately performed via endoscopic stapler or via the extraction site. In the case of a particularly bulky colorectal mesentery, early bowel division can improve visualization when performing the pelvic dissection.
23 Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection forRectal Cancer: TME Planes andSurgery…
Fig. 23.4 Isolation of the
inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) with dissection of the para-aortic lymph nodes
Table 23.1 Oncologic and functional outcomes of high versus low IMA ligation during LAR for
rectal cancer
Matsuda etal. GI tumors 2017 [5]
Matsuda etal. BJS 2015 [6]
Fujii, etal. BJS Open [7] Mari etal. Ann Surg
2018. (HIGHLOW trial) [8]
RCT randomized controlled trial, OS overall survival, DFS disease-free survival, FIQOL fecal incontinence quality of life, NS not signicant, LN lymph nodes
N=100, ‘08-‘11. RCT: high vs. low ligation in LAR for rectal cancer N=100, ‘08-‘11, TCT: high vs. low ligation in LAR for rectal caner
N=331, ‘06-‘12, RCT: high vs. low ligation N=214, ‘14-‘16, RCT: high vs. low ligation
NS: OS, DFS (including stage III), # LN
16.7 vs. 14.9
NS: defecatory dysfunction, FIQOL, fecal incontinence, anastomotic leak, 16% vs. 10% (p=0.42) NS: anastomotic leak, 17.7% vs. 16.3%
Low ligation: signicant for better continence, fewer urinary symptoms (p<0.05 @ 1 and 9months), better QOL and sexual function NS: anastomotic leak: 8.1% vs. 6.7%
361
Fig. 23.5 Low IMA
ligation with lymph nodes in specimen and preservation of the LCA
362
E. M. Haas and A. V. Hayman
Splenic Flexure Mobilization
Additional length of the proximal colon may be needed to perform the anastomosis in a tension-free fashion. If so, we generally use the sub-IMV approach, either before or after IMA ligation, to accomplish this. With this technique, the patient is placed in slight reverse Trendelenburg position. The key is to carefully sweep the small intestine right lateral and cephalad to expose the ligament of Treitz. It is helpful to have the assistant retract the transverse colon cephalad to expose this area. The surgeon then identies the IMV and incises the peritoneum in a horizontal fashion posterior to the vein along border of the ligament of Treitz. The retroperitoneal plane deep to the vein is then developed, and the vein is isolated and divided. The borders of the retroperito­neal dissection plane are the white line of Toldt along the descending colon (lateral), the inferior border of the pancreas (superior), and the origin the left colic artery (infe­rior). When dividing the IMV, allow for 1–2cm cuff of vessel to avoid retraction of a bleeding vein beneath the pancreas should ligation be inadequate. We have found that the sub-IMV technique allows for easier identication of the dissection planes around the pedicle. For more details on various approaches for splenic exure take down, please refer to Chapter 4 on splenic exure release.
Lateral Dissection
Prior to starting the pelvic dissection, we then complete the lateral dissection. We initiate this dissection along the sigmoid colon and continue in a cranial fashion. If the sub-IMV approach has been accomplished, the peritoneal attachments will be well dened and separated from the retroperitoneal plane. The best way to accom­plish the lateral dissection is to have the assistant gently retract the proximal colon medial and cephalad to expose and stretch the peritoneal refection. The surgeon uses an atraumatic instrument to push the colon medially for counter-traction (it is impor­tant to guide trainees with this technique as their instincts are often to traumatically grasp the mesentery), putting the peritoneal attachments on tension (Fig.23.6). This
Fig. 23.6 The colon is
retracted to stretch the peritoneal reection for lateral to medial dissection along the white line of Toldt
23 Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection forRectal Cancer: TME Planes andSurgery…
363
will allow for efcient division of these attachments all the way up to the splenic exure, staying just medial to Gerota’s fascia.
One helpful tip is that the peritoneum over the lateral retroperitoneal struc­tures appears slightly pink, as opposed to the peritoneum over the colon mesen­tery which appears slightly yellow. In order to maintain the correct plane, it is advised to score 1mm on the yellow fat to avoid stripping the peritoneum off the side wall.
This technique is continued proximally around the splenic exure, staying close to the colon, to enter the lesser sac. As we approach the splenocolic liga­ment, we often switch from hot scissors to a thermal energy device such as a bipolar device or harmonic scalpel to minimize thermal spread and achieve ade­quate hemostasis. Dissection is continued until entry into the lesser sac is achieved, usually marked by visualization of the posterior wall of the stomach. If the colon is closely adhered to the spleen or exposure is otherwise limited, we will change our approach and attack it proximally. The assistant retracts the mid-transverse colon omentum cephalad, while the surgeon pulls inferiorly on the transverse colon tenia. The omentum is then dissected off the colon until the lesser sac is opened. This dissection plane is carried distally until it meets the descending colon plane. Typically, there will be a few more attachments anterior to Gerota’s fascia that will need to be ligated.
Lastly, we return our attention to the rectosigmoid colon and release the lateral attachments at the intersigmoid fold, taking care to avoid injury to the left gonadal vein and left ureter. Continue the peritoneal release as distally as possible by retract­ing the rectum medially and cephalad to expose the left pararectal gutter (Fig.23.7). We score the peritoneum up and over the lateral edge of sacral promontory, being careful to stay just medial to the peritoneal edge. We perform the contralateral peri­toneal release on the right during the IMA pedicle ligation (Fig.23.8). Remember from embryology that the colon was a midline structure. Especially for low colorec­tal anastomoses, splenic exure mobilization is not complete until the colon is able to be fully mobilized to the midline.
Fig. 23.7 The rectum is
retracted medially to expose the left pararectal gutter
364
Fig. 23.8 Exposure and
release of the right pararectal peritoneal attachments
Fig. 23.9 Dissection in
the avascular presacral plane
E. M. Haas and A. V. Hayman
Pelvic Dissection
Dissection continues in the presacral mesorectal plane from the sacral promontory toward the retrosacral fascia. Care is taken to maintain the correct dissection plane identied by the avascular alveolar tissue while keeping the investing fascia of mesorectum intact (Fig.23.9). The surgeon scores the peritoneum where the blood pools along the right and left pararectal gutters, until the anterior reection is reached. With the assistant grasping the sigmoid, the surgeon then lifts the rectum with a blunt instrument and dissects in the posterior plane up and over the sacral promontory into the pelvis. The lateral stalks of the rectum are divided with hot cautery. Next, the anterior reection of the rectum is scored and the plane between the anterior pelvic strictures (seminal vesicles in a man and vagina in a woman) and the anterior wall of the rectum is developed until the rectum has been adequately
23 Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection forRectal Cancer: TME Planes andSurgery…
365
mobilized based on the location of the tumor. In the case of an upper rectal tumor, at least 2 centimeters of distal margin and 5 centimeters of mesenteric margin are required. A tangential resection across the mesorectum is performed with the aid of thermal energy device to control the mesenteric vessels. Care is taken to keep the investing fascia of the mesorectum intact and to avoid the tendency to cone into the mesenteric envelope.
Dividing theRectum
During specimen division, the surgeon must decide whether to divide the mesentery or the bowel lumen rst. Typically, the mesentery is initially divided. This is per­formed in a tangential fashion using thermal energy device with care taken not to injure the rectal wall. A reticulating linear stapler is placed though the 12mm RLQ port, and the rectal wall is stapled and divided. It is important to compress the bowel wall in a linear fashion, and use of a second staple cartridge load is often necessary. In cases of a particularly bulky mesorectum and/or narrow male pelvis, dividing the bowel rst can be helpful. A tunnel beneath the bowel wall is carefully created by developing a plane between the bowel wall and the mesentery. The reticulating lin­ear stapler slides into this plane, and the bowel is then divided in one or two loads. The mesorectum is now readily exposed for division.
Alternatively, one can widen the Pfannestiel extraction incision and perform division of the bowel and mesentery under direct nonlaparoscopic access. This should be reserved for large bulky tumor or otherwise unfavorable anatomy.
The most important aspect of this portion of the case is to maintain adequate distal and circumferential resection margins. A proper distal margin of at least 2cm can be ensured by concomitant intraoperative endoscopic visualization of the tumor. Again, it is important to achieve a 5cm mesenteric margin due to the vagaries of local lymph node drainage (Fig.23.10).
Fig. 23.10 Tumor-specic
mesorectal excision for showing 5cm mesenteric margin
366
E. M. Haas and A. V. Hayman
Specimen Extraction andCreating theAnastomosis
We utilize a small Pfannenstiel incision for our extraction site to minimize pain, hernia rate, and improve cosmesis. Generally, we also place and secure the anvil of the circular stapler into the proximal end of colon via this site. The assistant then places the circular stapler through the rectum and opens the stapler just anterior to the rectal staple line. The anvil is then attached to the head of the stapler, which is closed and then actuated. The patient is then taken out of Trendelenburg and the pelvis lled with saline, submerging the anastomosis. The assistant advances a ex­ible or rigid endoscope past the anastomosis under direct visualization to assess for anastomotic integrity and hemostasis while insufating. The operating surgeon assesses for any bubbling from the anastomosis, indicating a potential leak. Generally, for upper and mid-rectal tumors, we do not perform a diverting loop ileostomy unless there are poor prognostic features of healing, most commonly in the background of a radiated eld.
Pitfalls andTroubleshooting
When toConvert
Typically, the most difcult portion of the case is the pelvic dissection, especially when operating in a postradiated or postoperative eld or in the presence of a bulky, locally advanced, or previously perforated tumor. In these cases, we still commence the proce­dure with a minimally invasive approach performing the splenic exure, sub-IMV dis­section and colon mobilization laparoscopically, then performing the remainder of the pelvic dissection and specimen extraction through the Pfannenstiel extraction incision. Although for novices, laparoscopic dissection and exposure of challenging anatomy or splenic exure takedown may be daunting and result in early conversion to open sur­gery, with experience this approach will become more routine. However, as with dif­cult low pelvic dissections, although conversion to open may allow for more effective retraction and counter-traction, visualization is often sacriced, due to the loss of mag­nication and high-denition imaging supplied by modern laparoscopes. Therefore, in order to minimize the morbidity of an open incision, whenever possible, we attempt to keep our incisions subumbilical even when we need to convert.
Another tool that aids in anatomic identication is preoperative cystoscopy and ureteral catheter placement by urology. If preoperative ureteral catheters are uti­lized, intraoperative identication can be accomplished laparoscopically by inject­ing 25mg of indocyanine green in 10mL of saline via a Luer lock attachment into each catheter and performing intraoperative uorescence imaging utilizing Spy or, if using the robot, FireFly technology. This will allow the ureters to light up green throughout the duration of the case (Fig. 23.11a, b). However, if these tools are insufcient to allow safe visualization, or if at any point the surgeon is concerned about safely proceeding with the procedure, the surgeon should consider conversion to an open or, when possible, a hand-assisted approach.
23 Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection forRectal Cancer: TME Planes andSurgery…
367
ab
Fig. 23.11 (a, b) Intraoperative localization of the left ureter using Firey uorescence and ICG
injection into the left ureteral stent. (Courtesy of Josh Wallet, MD)
The laparoscopic surgeon should be constantly vigilant about avoiding intraop­erative injury to major vascular structures (IMA, iliac vessels, pelvic side wall ves­sels, and presacral venous plexus) or adjacent organs (small intestine, spleen, bladder). One tip is to alert the operating room staff prior to a critical portion of the procedure (IMA ligation, splenic exure takedown) and ensure that any potential equipment needed in the event of an unintended injury is immediately available. In the event of IMA stump bleed, a large plastic clip or looped laparoscopic ligature may be helpful in controlling bleeding. Hollow organ injury (bladder, small intes­tine) can be repaired, either denitely or for temporary control, via laparoscopic suturing with an absorbable suture. Although a detailed discussion about managing intraoperative splenic bleeding is beyond the scope of this chapter, briey, the lapa­roscopic surgeon must be aware that any undue traction on the splenocolic ligament can result in splenic bleeding. If just a subcapsular tear, a useful tool for managing this can be intraoperative placement of an absorbable hemostatic knit mesh, along with extended pressure.

Outcomes

Every prospective proctectomy patient should be asked about any baseline bowel, sexual, or urinary dysfunction. They should be counseled about the risk of surgery including low anterior resection syndrome (LARS), incontinence, impotence, blad­der dysfunction, and others especially in those who will undergo neoadjuvant radia­tion therapy.
There are debates about the risk versus benet ratio of high versus low ligation of the IMA during LAR; one must balance oncologic outcomes (i.e., overall land disease-free survival) with functional outcomes (defecatory, urinary, and sexual function). Some purists insist that it is essential to perform a full lymphadenectomy for LAR completed for malignancy, up to just after the takeoff of the IMA from the aorta and cephalad to the aortic bifurcation. However, other surgeons have argued that this adds unnecessary risk of injury to the autonomic nerves, specically the