Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_917_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Preface
- •Acknowledgments
- •Contents
- •Contributors
- •1: SAGES University MASTERS Program: Colorectal Pathway
- •Introduction
- •References
- •Colorectal Surgery Curriculum
- •Facebook™ Groups
- •Conclusion
- •Operative Setup
- •Operating Room Setup
- •Patient Positioning
- •Operative Technique: Surgical Steps
- •Trocar Placement
- •Top-Down Approach
- •Outcomes
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Operative Setup
- •Operative Technique
- •Port Placement
- •Left/Sigmoid Colectomy
- •Outcomes
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Operative Setup
- •Operative Technique: Surgical Steps
- •Supramesocolic Approach
- •Inframesocolic Approach
- •Outcomes
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Bibliography
- •Operative Setup
- •Operative Technique: Surgical Steps
- •Laparoscopic Access
- •Colon Transection
- •Specimen Extraction
- •Anastomosis
- •Fistula Repair
- •Other Steps
- •Outcomes
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Outcomes
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Solicit Institutional Support
- •Reviewing Current Data
- •Overcoming Barriers Through Culture Change
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Preoperative Risk Assessment
- •Special Considerations
- •Immune Suppression
- •Smokers
- •Malnutrition
- •Obesity
- •Renal Impairment
- •Preoperative Stoma Marking
- •Preoperative Patient Education
- •Parenteral Antibiotics
- •Positioning
- •Surgical Time-Out
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Preoperative Preparation
- •Laparoscopic Access
- •Special Considerations
- •Complicated Peritoneal Entry
- •Equipment Issues
- •Physiologic Issues
- •Optimizing Laparoscopic Exposure
- •OR Table Positioning
- •Laparoscopic Visualization
- •Splenic Bleeding
- •Organ Injury
- •Small Bowel Injury
- •Ureteral Injury
- •Trocar Site Closure
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Definitions
- •Central Venous Ligation (CVL)
- •Pathological Outcomes
- •Long-Term Survival
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •12: Unexpected Findings at Appendectomy
- •Inflamed Meckel’s Diverticulum
- •Appendiceal Mass
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Cecal Diverticulitis
- •Sigmoid Diverticulitis
- •Epiploic Appendagitis
- •Crohn’s Disease
- •Gynecologic Pathology
- •Operative Setup
- •Operative Technique: Surgical Steps, Medial-to-Lateral Approach
- •Outcomes
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Preoperative Planning
- •Operative Techniques
- •Positioning
- •Trocars Placement
- •Side-to-Side Stapled Anastomosis
- •Side-to-Side Handsewn Anastomosis
- •Side-to-End Stapled Anastomosis
- •Side-to-End Handsewn Anastomosis
- •End-to-Side Handsewn Anastomosis
- •End-to-End Handsewn Anastomosis
- •Operative Time
- •Spillage
- •Alignment/Ergonomics
- •Outcomes
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Operative Setup
- •da Vinci Xi® Setup (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA)
- •Operative Technique: Surgical Steps
- •Outcomes
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Operative Setup
- •Complex Crohn’s Disease Resection
- •Crohn’s Fistula
- •Difficult Crohn’s Mesentery
- •Ileocolonic Reconstruction
- •Intracorporeal Anastomosis
- •Extracorporeal Anastomosis
- •Entry
- •Adhesiolysis
- •Thickened Mesentery
- •Anastomotic Problems
- •Postoperative Issues
- •Outcomes
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Preoperative Optimization
- •Accelerated Recovery Pathway
- •Operative Technique: Surgical Steps
- •Locally Advanced Tumors
- •Outcomes
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Operative Setup
- •Operative Technique: Surgical Steps
- •Colonic J Pouch
- •Transverse Coloplasty
- •Baker’s Anastomosis
- •Anastomotic Assessment
- •Rectal Stump Blowout
- •Staple Line Bleeding
- •Outcomes
- •Anastomotic Leak
- •Anastomotic Assessment
- •Temporary Fecal Diversion
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Malignant Diseases
- •Benign Diseases
- •Operative Setup
- •Patient Positioning
- •Room Setup
- •Operative Technique
- •Trocar Placement
- •Si® Robot (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA)
- •Xi® Robot (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA)
- •Si Robot
- •Xi Robot
- •Instrument Insertion
- •Extracorporeal Anastomosis
- •Intracorporeal Anastomosis
- •Instrument Collisions
- •Bleeding
- •Anastomotic Leak
- •Outcomes
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Operative Technique: Surgical Steps
- •Adhesions
- •Difficult Rectal Stump Dissection
- •Rectal Stump Retraction
- •Outcomes
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Review Operative Report
- •Review Pathology Report
- •Cross-Sectional Imaging
- •Ureteral Stents
- •Operative Setup
- •Operative Technique: Surgical Steps
- •Outcomes
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Preoperative Staging
- •Indications and Contraindications
- •Multidisciplinary Management
- •Preoperative Versus Postoperative Chemoradiation
- •Short-Course Radiotherapy
- •Intraoperative Radiation
- •Adjuvant Chemotherapy
- •Total Neoadjuvant Therapy
- •Nonoperative Management
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Other Equipment/Incisions
- •Splenic Flexure Mobilization
- •Lateral Dissection
- •Pelvic Dissection
- •Outcomes
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Operative Setup
- •Positioning
- •Port Placement
- •Extraction Site
- •Operative Technique: Surgical Steps
- •Splenic Flexure Release
- •Rectal Mobilization
- •Posterior Dissection
- •Lateral Dissection
- •Anterior Dissection
- •Pelvic Floor Dissection
- •Outcomes
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Synchronous Masses/Tumors
- •Meckel’s Diverticulum
- •Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
- •Liver Metastasis
- •Ovarian Mass
- •Malrotation
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Outcomes
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Technique
- •Learning Curve
- •Outcomes
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Operative Strategy
- •Operative Setup
- •Patient Positioning
- •Port Placement
- •Diagnostic Laparoscopy
- •Minimally Invasive Resectional Approach
- •Best Approach
- •Splenic Flexure Mobilization (If Needed)
- •Distal Colon Transection
- •Considerations During Laparoscopic Hartmann’s Procedure
- •Obese Patients
- •Minimally Invasive Non-resectional Approach
- •Laparoscopic Peritoneal Lavage
- •Operative Setup
- •Port Placement
- •Postoperative Management
- •Outcomes
- •Resection
- •Laparoscopic Lavage
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Outcomes
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Splenic Flexure Release
- •Colonic Conduit Ischemia
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Surgeon-Related Factors
- •Bowel Preparation
- •Ureteral Stents
- •Patient Positioning
- •Pneumoperitoneum
- •Laparoscopic Exposure: Trocars
- •Laparoscopic Adhesiolysis

128
S. Eisenstein and A. L. Grucela
Another option for patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery is adjunct
spinal analgesia. This is a single preoperative injection of a combination of morphine and long-acting local anesthetic into the L3-L4 space. Although not studied
extensively, this modality has been shown in limited studies to provide as much as
3days of postoperative analgesia, generally decreasing narcotic requirements and
pain scores, without affecting other postoperative outcome [49].
Prevention ofVenous Thromboembolism
Venous thromboembolic events (VTE), which include deep vein thrombosis (DVT)
and pulmonary embolism (PE), remain the most preventable cause of perioperative
morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients. Over 250,000 patients are diagnosed with DVT, and 50,000 patients are diagnosed with PE each year [50]. A quarter of patients with PE present with sudden death [51]. Colorectal surgical patients
are at a four- to vefold higher risk of PE relative to other general surgery patients.
Rectal surgery places patients at higher risk of VTE due to extensive pelvic dissection, prolonged placement of patient in Trendelenburg position, and prolonged
operative time. In addition, obesity, malignancy, and inammatory bowel disease
[52, 53] have a greater risk of VTE.
Current CHEST and SAGES guidelines for VTE prophylaxis for laparoscopic
surgery stratify surgical patients into four categories of risk based on the Caprini
Score (Table9.4) [54–56]: very low (no risk factors), low (one to two points), moderate (three to four points), and high (ve points and greater). Patients at moderate
Table 9.4 Caprini Score
One point
Age 41–60years
Swollen legs (current)
Varicose veins
BMI>25
Minor surgery
Sepsis (within last month)
Serious lung disease
Oral contraceptives
Pregnancy or postpartum
<1month
History of stillborn infant,
recurrent spontaneous
abortion, premature birth
Acute myocardial infarction
History of inammatory
bowel disease
History of prior major
surgery (<1month)
Abnormal pulmonary
function
Two points Three points
Age 61–74years
Arthroscopic
surgery
Malignancy
Laparoscopic
surgery
(>45minutes)
Patients conned to
bed rest (>72hours)
Immobilizing
plaster Cast
(>1month)
Central venous
access
Major surgery
(>45minutes)
Age>75years
History of DVT/PE
Factor V Leiden
Elevated
homocysteine
Heparin-induced
thrombocytopenia
Elevated
anticardiolipin
Lupus anticoagulant
Prothrombin
202110A
Family history of
thrombosis
Four points
Stroke (<1month)
Elective lower
extremity
arthroplasty
Hip, pelvis, or leg
fracture
(<1month)
Acute spinal cord
injury (<1month)
Multiple trauma
(<1month)

9 Checklist forPatients andOR Team inPreparation forLaparoscopic Colorectal…
129
risk and greater require chemical and mechanical VTE prophylaxis. Chemical prophylaxis entails 5000 U of unfractionated heparin administered subcutaneously
three times daily. Mechanical VTE prophylaxis entails use of graduated compression boots placed prior to anesthesia induction, and after induction, 5000 U of
unfractionated heparin is administered subcutaneously.
Parenteral Antibiotics
The benet of perioperative prophylactic parenteral antibiotic use has been well
established. Current Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) guidelines and SSI
protocol bundles require administration of parenteral antibiotics within 1hour of
incision (preferably within 30minutes) [57, 58]. Multiple antibiotic regimens (Box
9.4) are suitable for elective colorectal surgery. These regimens should be tailored
to accommodate institutional variations of species sensitivities. All antibiotics
should be re-dosed per protocols based on antibiotics and case length. Parenteral
antibiotics may be continued postoperatively, but are generally not, and should be
discontinued within 24hours of operative end time.
Box 9.4 Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Elective Colon and Rectal Surgery
• Ampicillin-sulbactam
• Cefoxitin, cefotetan (second-generation cephalosporin with aerobic and
anaerobic activity)
• Cefazolin plus metronidazole
• Ceftriaxone plus metronidazole (institutions with increased resistance to
second- generation cephalosporins)
• Cefuroxime plus metronidazole
• Ertapenem
• Alternatives for patients with beta-lactam allergy:
– Clindamycin or vancomycin plus aminoglycoside, aztreonam, or
uoroquinolone
– Metronidazole plus aminoglycoside or uoroquinolone
– (Metronidazole should not be combined with aztreonam as this will
have no aerobic gram-positive coverage)
Positioning
Careful patient positioning is critical to ensure that the surgeon and assistant have
access to the anatomy and that dexterity is not limited by patient habitus. Careful
positioning is also important in preventing pressure-related injuries during the
procedure.
Lithotomy or split leg position should generally be used for patients undergoing
pelvic procedures. This should be performed with the anus just past the lower

130
S. Eisenstein and A. L. Grucela
break of the table. This is important because access to the anus is often part of critical steps during the procedure such as the placement of an EEA stapler or in performing exible endoscopy. Lithotomy should be undertaken with padded Allen
stirrups. The legs should be placed carefully, the pressure points should be padded,
and the weight should be placed on the patient’s heel and off of their calf to help
prevent peroneal nerve injury or compartment syndrome. During the procedure,
when the anus is not being accessed, it is often helpful to bring the legs down so
the thighs are parallel to the oor. This will help prevent instrument limitation by
the legs.
Both of the arms should be tucked during laparoscopic surgery. While this does
limit the anesthesiologist’s access to the arms, and their vascular access, it facilitates
surgeon positioning and access during the case, especially for pelvic dissections. It
is important to discuss this with the anesthesiologist prior to positioning so they
have all access planned, which is required for the case. Pressure points, such as the
elbows, and the hypothenar aspect of the hand should be carefully padded to prevent
pressure injury prior to tucking.
Patients should be afxed to the bed in multiple points to prevent any slippage
during surgery. Pelvic surgery often requires steep Trendelenburg positioning, and
this may cause the patient’s anus to slip above the bed break. Similarly in a total
colectomy or exure mobilization, the patient may go through extremes in positioning from Trendelenburg to reverse Trendelenburg and steep lateral positioning. In
patients undergoing surgery in a supine position, it is helpful to place a strap across
the thighs as well and the chest, taking care to avoid the patient’s neck. In lithotomy
position, the stirrups will serve as one point of xation, and a chest strap should act
as a second. We also recommend the use of xation pads such as the Pink Pad™
(Xodus Medical, New Kensington, PA, USA). These devices are pads consisting of
a high-friction foam which prevents patient slippage during extreme positioning.
Urinary Catheterization andUreteral Stenting
Generally urinary catheters are placed preoperatively and removed within
12–24 hours of surgery. Catheters allow for decompression of the bladder, thus
avoiding injury on trocar placement and allowing access/visualization in the pelvis.
Catheters can often be avoided in brief procedures by having the patient void their
bladder contents just prior to surgery.
In the setting of laparoscopic surgery, the surgeon is not afforded the opportunity to appreciate the ureters by palpation. Stents have not been shown to decrease
rates of injury [59]. However, the use of preoperatively placed ureteral stents
allows for the early identication and repair of ureteral injury [60, 61]. Stents are
of particular benet in the setting of prior pelvic surgery, inammation, locally
advanced cancers, or prior pelvic radiation. Any such circumstances can make pelvic dissection more difcult. Historically lighted stents have only been useful in
the thinnest of patients as thick tissue has made it difcult to appreciate the luminescence. A newer technique which is more cost-effective which allows for better

ab
cd
9 Checklist forPatients andOR Team inPreparation forLaparoscopic Colorectal…
131
Fig. 9.2 (a–d) Ureteral stent with ICG
visualization is injecting indocyanine green (ICG), which uoresces under infrared
light (Fig.9.2a–d). There are little data to date to demonstrate the efcacy of these
technologies, however.
OR Setup andEquipment
Each team member has a specic role and responsibility in setting up the operating
room and ensuring necessary equipment is available and functioning properly. The
duties specic to the circulating nurse, scrub person, surgeon/surgery team, and
anesthesiologist both prior to and after the patient enters the OR and after prepping
and draping is outlined comprehensively in Fig.9.3 [62].
Surgical Time-Out
The surgical time-out should consist of a verbal checklist of all the abovementioned
factors to ensure they are all properly performed prior to incision. The WHO also
has a checklist which is incorporated in many institution’s time-out procedures
(Fig.9.4) [63].

132
Fig. 9.3 SAGES/AORN MIS safety checklist. (Used with permission of the Society of American
Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons from: https://www.sages.org/wp-content/uploads/
SAGES_AORN_MIS_Checklist.pdf)
S. Eisenstein and A. L. Grucela
Fig. 9.4 World Health Organization surgical safety checklist. (Used with permission of the World
Health Organization: whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2009/9789241598590_eng_Checklist.pdf)

9 Checklist forPatients andOR Team inPreparation forLaparoscopic Colorectal…
133
Conclusion
Each team member plays a critical role in preoperative preparation for laparoscopic
colorectal surgery. Careful preoperative prevention and planning along with patient
education and preoperative preparation in the operating room result in successful
laparoscopic colon and rectal surgery.
References
1. American Society of Anesthesiologists. Schaumburg. Available from: https://www.asahq.org/
standards-and-guidelines/asa-physical-status-classication-system.
2. Smith RK, Broach R, Traci H, Mahmoud NN, Paulson EC.Impact of BMI on postoperative
outcomes in patients undergoing proctectomy for rectal cancer: A National Surgical Quality
Improvement Program analysis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014;57:687–93.
3. van Vugt JLA, Cakir H, Kornmann VNN, Doodeman HJ, Stoot JH, Boerma D, etal. The new
body mass index as a predictor of postoperative complications in elective colorectal cancer
surgery. Clin Nut. 2015;34(4):700–40.
4. Odonkor PN, Grigore AM. Patients with ischemic heart disease. Med Clin N Am.
2013;97:1033–50.
5. Fleisher LA, Bechman JA, Brown KA, Calkins H, Chaikof E, Fleischmann KE, etal. ACC/
AHA 2007 guidelines on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and care for noncardiac surgery: executive summary. JACC. 2007;50:1707–32.
6. Lee TH, Marcantonio ER, Mangione CM, Thomas EJ, Polanczyk CA, Cook EF, et al.
Circulation. 1999;100:1043–9.
7. Gupta S, Gupta H, Sundaram A, Kaushik M, Fang X, Miller WJ, etal. Development and
validation of a risk calculator for prediction of cardiac risk after surgery. Circulation.
2011;124:381–7.
8. Markel TA, Lou DC, Pfefferkorn M, Scherer LR 3rd, West K, Rouse T, etal. Steroids and poor
nutrition are associated with infectious wound complications in children undergoing rst stage
procedures for ulcerative colitis. Surgery. 2008;144:540–5.
9. Fleshner P, Ippoliti A, Dubinsky M, Ognibene S, Vasiliauskas E, Chelly M, etal. A prospective
multivariate analysis of clinical factors associated with pouchitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5:952–8.
10. Lim M, Sagar P, Abdulgader A, Thekkinkattil D, Burke D.The impact of preoperative immu-
nomodulation on pouch-related septic complications after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Dis
Colon Rectum. 2007;50:943–51.
11. Lake JP, Firoozmand E, Kang JC, Vassiliu P, Chan LS, Vukasin P, etal. Effect of high-dose ste-
roids on anastomotic complications after proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.
J Gastrointest Surg. 2004;8:547–51.
12. Ziv Y, Church JM, Fazio VW, King TM, Lavery IC.Effect of systemic steroids on ileal pouch-
anal anastomosis in patients with ulcerative colitis. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39:504–8.
13. Kelly KN, Domajnko B. Perioperative stress-dose steroids. Clin Colon and Rectal Surg.
2013;26:163–7.
14. Zaghiyan K, Melmed GY, Berel D, Ovsepyan G, Murrell Z, Fleshner P. A prospective, ran-
domized, noninferiority trial of steroid dosing after major colorectal surgery. Ann Surg.
2014;259:32–7.
15. Mahadevan U, Loftus EV Jr, Tremaine WJ, Pemberton JH, Harmsen WS, Schleck CD, etal.
Azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine before colectomy for ulcerative colitis is not associated
with increased postoperative complications. Inamm Bowel Dis. 2002;8:311–6.

134
16. Huang W, Tang Y, Nong L, Sun Y.Risk factors for postoperative intra-abdominal septic com-
plications after surgery in Crohn’s disease: a meta-analysis of observational studies. J Crohns
Colitis. 2015;9:293–301.
17. Selvaggi F, Pellino G, Canonico S, Sciaudone G.Effect of preoperative biologic drugs on com-
plications and function after restorative proctocolectomy with primary ileal pouch formation:
systematic review and meta-analysis. Inamm Bowel Dis. 2015;21(1):79–92.
18. Mor IJ, Vogel JD, da Luz Moreira A, Shen B, Hammel J, Remzi FH.Iniximab in ulcerative
colitis is associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications after restorative
proctocolectomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51:1202–10.
19. Coquet-Reinier B, Berdah SV, Grimaud JC, Birnbaum D, Cougard PA, Barthet M, et al.
Preoperative iniximab treatment and postoperative complications after laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a case-matched study. Surg Endosc.
2010;24:1866–71.
20. Narula N, Charleton D, Marshall JK.Meta-analysis: peri-operative anti-TNFα treatment and
post-operative complications in patients with inammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol
Ther. 2013;37:1057–64.
21. Nørgård BM, Nielsen J, Qvist N, Gradel KO, de Muckadell OB, Kjeldsen J.Pre-operative use
of anti-TNF-α agents and the risk of post-operative complications in patients with ulcerative
colitis– a nationwide cohort study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2012;35:1301–9.
22. Lau C, Dubinsky M, Melmed G, Vasiliauskas E, Berel D, McGovern D, etal. The impact of
preoperative serum anti-TNFα therapy levels on early postoperative outcomes in inammatory
bowel disease surgery. Ann Surg. 2015;261:487–96.
23. Hawn MT, Houston TK, Campagna EJ, Graham LA, Singh J, Bishop M, etal. The attributable
risk of smoking on surgical complications. Ann Surg. 2011;254:914–20.
24. Sorensen LT.Wound healing and infection in surgery: the pathophysiological impact of smok-
ing, smoking cessation, and nicotine replacement therapy: a systematic review. Ann Surg.
2012;255:1069–79.
25. Sorensen LT. Wound healing and infection in surgery. The clinical impact of smoking and
smoking cessation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Surg. 2012;147:373–83.
26. Lumb AB.Pre-operative respiratory optimisation: an expert review. Anaesthesia. 2019;74
Suppl 1:43–8.
27. Anthenelli RM, Benowitz NL, West R, St Aubin L, McRae T, Lawrence D, et al.
Neuropsychiatric safety and efcacy of varenicline, bupropion, and nicotine patch in smokers with and without psychiatric disorders (EAGLES): a double-blind, randomised, placebocontrolled clinical trial. Lancet. 2016;387:2507–20.
28. Hu WH, Cajas-Monson L, Eisenstein S, Parry L, Cosman B, Ramamoorthy S.Preoperative
malnutrition assessments as predictors of postoperative mortality and morbidity in colorectal
cancer: an analysis of ACS-NSQIP.Nutr J. 2015;14:91.
29. van Rooijen S, Carli F, Dalton S, Thomas G, Bojesen R, Le Guen M, etal. Multimodal preha-
bilitation in colorectal cancer patients to improve functional capacity and reduce postoperative
complications: the rst international randomized controlled trial for multimodal prehabilitation. BMC Cancer. 2019;19:98.
30. Brennan GT, Ha I, Hogan C, Nguyen E, Jamal MM, Bechtold ML, etal. Does preoperative
enteral or parenteral nutrition reduce postoperative complications in Crohn’s disease patients:
a meta-analysis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;30:997–1002.
31. Calder PC.Immunonutrition. BMJ. 2003;327:117–8.
32. Probst P, Ohmann S, Klaiber U, Hüttner FJ, Billeter AT, Ulrich A, etal. Meta-analysis of
immunonutrition in major abdominal surgery. Br J Surg. 2017;104:1594–608.
33. Wahl TS, Patel FC, Goss LE, Chu DI, Grams J, Morris MS. The obese colorectal surgery
patient: surgical site infection and outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum. 2018;61:938–45.
34. Hill C, Khashab MA, Kalloo AN, Kumbhari V.Endoluminal weight loss and metabolic thera-
pies: current and future techniques. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018;1411:36–52.
35. Faria SL, Faria OP, de Almeida Cardeal M, Ito MK.Effects of a very low calorie diet in the pre-
operative stage of bariatric surgery: a randomized trial. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11:230–7.
S. Eisenstein and A. L. Grucela

9 Checklist forPatients andOR Team inPreparation forLaparoscopic Colorectal…
36. Yolsuriyanwong K, Thanavachirasin K, Sasso K, Zuro L, Barteld J, Marcotte E, et al.
Effectiveness, compliance, and acceptability of preoperative weight loss with a liquid very
low-calorie diet before bariatric surgery in real practice. Obes Surg. 2019;29:54–60.
37. Aquina CT, Rickles AS, Probst CP, Kelly KN, Deeb AP, Monson JR, etal. Visceral obesity, not
elevated BMI, is strongly associated with incisional hernia after colorectal surgery. Dis Colon
Rectum. 2015;58:220–7.
38. Sirany AM, Chow CJ, Kunitake H, Madoff RD, Rothenberger DA, Kwaan MR.Colorectal
surgery outcomes in chronic dialysis patients: an American College of Surgeons National
Surgical Quality Improvement Program Study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2016;59:662–9.
39. Deng J, Lenart J, Applegate RL.General anesthesia soon after dialysis may increase postop-
erative hypotension– a pilot study. Heart Lung Vessel. 2014;6:52–9.
40. Currie A, Malietzis G, Askari A, Nachiappan S, Swift P, Jenkins JT, etal. Impact of chronic
kidney disease on postoperative outcome following colorectal cancer surgery. Color Dis.
2014;16:879–85.
41. Cavallaro PM, Milch H, Savitt L, Hodin RA, Rattner DW, Berger DL, et al. Addition of a
scripted pre-operative patient education module to an existing ERAS pathway further reduces
length of stay. Am J Surg. 2018;216(4):652–7.
42. Park JS, Choi GS, Kwak KH, Jung H, Jeon Y, Park S, etal. Effect of local wound inltration
and transversus abdominis plane block on morphine use after laparoscopic colectomy: a nonrandomized, single-blind prospective study. J Surg Res. 2015;195:61–6.
43. Abdallah FW, Chan VW, Brull R. Transversus abdominis plane block: a systematic review.
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2012;37:193–209.
44. Courtot L, Le Roy B, Memeo R, Voron T, de Angelis N, Tabchouri N, etal. Risk factors for
postoperative ileus following elective laparoscopic right colectomy: a retrospective multicentric study. Int J Color Dis. 2018;33:1373–82.
45. Halabi WJ, Kang CY, Nguyen VQ, Carmichael JC, Mills S, Stamos MJ, etal. Epidural analge-
sia in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a nationwide analysis of use and outcomes. JAMA Surg.
2014;149:130–6.
46. Borzellino G, Francis NK, Chapuis O, Krastinova E, Dyevre V, Genna M.Role of epidural
analgesia within an ERAS program after laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a review and metaanalysis of randomised controlled studies. Surg Res Pract. 2016;2016:7543684.
47. Ventham NT, Kennedy ED, Brady RR, Paterson HM, Speake D, Foo I, etal. Efcacy of intra-
venous lidocaine for postoperative analgesia following laparoscopic surgery: a meta-analysis.
World J Surg. 2015;39:2220–34.
48. Herroeder S, Pecher S, Schönherr ME, Kaulitz G, Hahnenkamp K, Friess H, et al. Systemic
lidocaine shortens length of hospital stay after colorectal surgery: a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2007;246:192–200.
49. Day AR, Smith RV, Scott MJ, Fawcett WJ, Rockall TA.Randomized clinical trial investigat-
ing the stress response from two different methods of analgesia after laparoscopic colorectal
surgery. Br J Surg. 2015;102:1473–9.
50. McNally MP, Burns CJ.Venous thromboembolic disease in colorectal patients. Clin Colon
Rectal Surg. 2009;22:34–40.
51. Bergqvist D.Venous thromboembolism: a review of risk and prevention in colorectal surgery
patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49:1620–8.
52. Buchberg B, Masoomi H, Lusby K, Choi J, Barleben A, Magno C, etal. Incidence and risk
factors of venous thromboembolism in colorectal surgery. Arch Surg. 2011;146:739–43.
53. Gross ME, Vogler SA, Mone MC, Sheng X, Sklow B.Postoperative venous thromboembolism
prophylaxis in IBD: a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis. Dis Colon
Rectum. 2014;57:482–9.
54. Bahl V, Hu HM, Henke P, Wakeeld TW, Campbell DA Jr, Caprini JA.A validation study of
retrospective venous thromboembolism risk scoring method. Ann Surg. 2010;251:344–50.
55. Pollak AW, McBane RD.Succinct review of the new VTE prevention and management guide-
lines. Mayo Clinic Proc. 2014;89:394–408.
135

136
56. Richardson WS, Hamad GG, Stefanidis D. VTE prophylaxis for laparoscopic surgery
guidelines: an update [Internet] 2017. Available from: https://www.sages.org/publications/
guidelines/guidelines-for-deep-venous-thrombosis-prophylaxis-during-laparoscopic-surgery/.
57. National Guideline Clearinghouse. Rockville. Available from: http://www.guideline.gov/con-
tent.aspx?id=39533.
58. Bratzler DW, Dellinger EP, Olsen KM, Perl TM, Auwaerter PG, Bolon MK, etal. Clinical
practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Am J Health Syst Pharm.
2013;70:195–283.
59. Leff EI, Groff W, Rubin RJ, Eisenstat TE, Salvati EP.Use of ureteral catheters in colonic and
rectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 1982;25:457–60.
60. Nam YS, Wexner SD.Clinical value of prophylactic ureteral stent indwelling during laparo-
scopic colorectal surgery. J Korean Med Sci. 2002;17:633–5.
61. Tsukinaka S, Wexner SD, DaSilva G.Prophylactic ureteric catheters in laparoscopic colorectal
surgery. Tech Coloproctol. 2008;12:45–50.
62. MIS Safety Checklist [Internet]. Available from: https://www.sages.org/wp-content/uploads/
SAGES_AORN_MIS_Checklist.pdf.
63. Surgical Safety Checklist [Internet]. Available from: whqlibdoc.who.int/publica-
tions/2009/9789241598590_eng_Checklist.pdf.
S. Eisenstein and A. L. Grucela

Essentials onTroubleshooting During
Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery
AlexanderT.Hawkins andCraigH.Olson
Introduction
Laparoscopic surgery involves a complex interplay between the surgeon, technology, and the patient. For a case to go well and the patient to have a successful outcome, all aspects of the procedure must be carefully coordinated. However, this is
not always the case, and the laparoscopic surgeon needs to have the knowledge and
skills to correct things when an operation is deviating from the intended plan. This
chapter presents a number of potential issues with laparoscopic surgery– including
port placement, equipment, patient physiology, exposure, and inadvertent injury–
as well as methods to rescue successful surgery.
10
Preoperative Preparation
Troubleshooting should begin even before the patient enters the operating room. It is
important to engage in early discussion with the anesthesia team, circulating nurse,
and scrub technician prior to the procedure. Items for discussion include patient positioning as well as the need to change positions, e.g., ipping prone for an abdominal
perineal resection. For robotic surgery, thought must be given to where the robot will
dock, along with where the assistants will stand. The appropriate table needs to be in
the room, along with any other positioning equipment such as a footboard, beanbag,
or straps. The proper case carts, equipment, supplies, and instruments should be in
the rooms and checked to make sure they are operational. This particularly applies to
A. T. Hawkins
Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of General Surgery, Nashville, TN, USA
e-mail: Alex.hawkins@vumc.org
C. H. Olson (
Clements University Hospital, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
e-mail: Craig.olson@utsouthwestern.edu
© Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) 2020
P. Sylla et al. (eds.), The SAGES Manual of Colorectal Surgery,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24812-3_10
*)
137
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
